pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.08533 · v2 · submitted 2024-11-13 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI

ACROSS: A Deformation-Based Cross-Modal Representation for Robotic Tactile Perception

Wadhah Zai El Amri , Malte Kuhlmann , Nicol\'as Navarro-Guerrero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AI
keywords tactile perceptioncross-modal translationdeformation meshesBioTacDIGITrobotic sensingsensor data adaptationslip detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

ACROSS translates BioTac signals to DIGIT images using 3D deformation meshes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents ACROSS, a framework designed to translate data between different tactile sensors by using deformation information. It converts sensor signals into 3D deformation meshes, transitions those meshes between sensor types, and then converts them to the target sensor's output format. This is shown by adapting BioTac signals, which are low-dimensional, to the high-dimensional DIGIT tactile images. The goal is to keep valuable existing datasets usable even after sensors become outdated or when groups use different hardware.

Core claim

ACROSS establishes that tactile data can be transferred across sensor modalities by representing interactions as 3D deformation meshes that are independent of the specific sensor geometry. The process involves signal-to-mesh conversion, mesh-to-mesh transition, and mesh-to-output conversion, demonstrated on the BioTac to DIGIT task to preserve information for applications such as slip detection and object identification.

What carries the argument

The 3D deformation mesh as an intermediate representation that encodes the physical deformation of the sensor surface during contact, allowing transfer between different sensor shapes and resolutions.

If this is right

  • BioTac datasets can be converted for use with DIGIT sensors without recollecting data.
  • Research groups using different tactile sensors can exchange data more easily.
  • The approach succeeds in the challenging direction from low-dimensional to high-dimensional tactile data.
  • Translated data supports downstream tasks like slip detection and object identification.
  • Valuable legacy datasets remain relevant as sensor technology evolves.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could extend to translating between other pairs of tactile sensors if their deformation models are compatible.
  • Robotics labs might adopt this to avoid losing access to historical data when upgrading hardware.
  • Future work could test whether the mesh transition preserves fine details needed for more complex manipulation tasks.

Load-bearing premise

That the 3D deformation meshes from different sensors can be accurately mapped while retaining the tactile information required for tasks such as slip detection or object identification.

What would settle it

Running slip detection or object identification on the translated DIGIT images and finding performance much lower than on real DIGIT data would falsify the claim that the translation preserves necessary information.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08533 by Malte Kuhlmann, Nicol\'as Navarro-Guerrero, Wadhah Zai El Amri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of the ACROSS framework applied to translate BioTac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Transferred BioTac sensor (green) to align it with the DIGIT sensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of artifacts in the generated image before (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Converted samples. First row: Real electrode values. Second row: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tactile perception is essential for human interaction with the environment and is becoming increasingly crucial in robotics. Tactile sensors like the BioTac mimic human fingertips and provide detailed interaction data. Despite its utility in applications like slip detection and object identification, this sensor is now deprecated, making many valuable datasets obsolete. However, recreating similar datasets with newer sensor technologies is both tedious and time-consuming. Therefore, adapting these existing datasets for use with new setups and modalities is crucial. In response, we introduce ACROSS, a novel framework for translating data between tactile sensors by exploiting sensor deformation information. We demonstrate the approach by translating BioTac signals into the DIGIT sensor. Our framework consists of first converting the input signals into 3D deformation meshes. We then transition from the 3D deformation mesh of one sensor to the mesh of another, and finally convert the generated 3D deformation mesh into the corresponding output space. We demonstrate our approach to the most challenging problem of going from a low-dimensional tactile representation to a high-dimensional one. In particular, we transfer the tactile signals of a BioTac sensor to DIGIT tactile images. Our approach enables the continued use of valuable datasets and data exchange between groups with different setups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces ACROSS, a framework for translating tactile sensor data across modalities by first converting input signals (e.g., BioTac electrode readings) into 3D deformation meshes, then transitioning those meshes to the geometry of a target sensor (e.g., DIGIT gel), and finally rendering the result into the target output space. The central demonstration is the low-to-high dimensional transfer from BioTac signals to DIGIT images, with the goal of repurposing deprecated sensor datasets for tasks such as slip detection and object identification.

Significance. If the deformation transfer step can be shown to preserve task-relevant contact features without distortion, the method would enable reuse of existing BioTac datasets on modern sensors and facilitate data exchange between labs with different hardware; the explicit use of 3D mesh geometry as an intermediate representation is a concrete technical contribution that could generalize beyond the two sensors shown.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / §3] Abstract and §3 (framework description): the claim that 'transition[ing] from the 3D deformation mesh of one sensor to the mesh of another' preserves the tactile information needed for downstream tasks is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative check (reconstruction error on known contacts, force-distribution fidelity, or downstream-task delta such as slip-detection accuracy) that would confirm the assumption holds across the curved-fluid vs. flat-gel geometry difference.
  2. [§4] §4 (demonstration): the text states that the approach 'demonstrate[s] our approach to the most challenging problem' but reports neither the mesh-transition algorithm (e.g., interpolation method, correspondence establishment) nor any ablation or baseline comparison, leaving the central empirical claim unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the three pipeline stages is introduced only descriptively; explicit equations or pseudocode for mesh conversion and transition would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'low-dimensional' vs. 'high-dimensional' representations without stating the actual dimensionalities or sensor resolutions, which would help readers assess the claimed difficulty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / §3] Abstract and §3 (framework description): the claim that 'transition[ing] from the 3D deformation mesh of one sensor to the mesh of another' preserves the tactile information needed for downstream tasks is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative check (reconstruction error on known contacts, force-distribution fidelity, or downstream-task delta such as slip-detection accuracy) that would confirm the assumption holds across the curved-fluid vs. flat-gel geometry difference.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not provide quantitative validation of whether the mesh transition preserves task-relevant features across the differing sensor geometries. This is a substantive gap. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative checks, including reconstruction error on known contacts, force-distribution fidelity metrics, and downstream-task deltas such as slip-detection accuracy before versus after transfer. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (demonstration): the text states that the approach 'demonstrate[s] our approach to the most challenging problem' but reports neither the mesh-transition algorithm (e.g., interpolation method, correspondence establishment) nor any ablation or baseline comparison, leaving the central empirical claim unsupported.

    Authors: The referee correctly observes that the current text does not describe the mesh-transition algorithm nor supply ablations or baselines. We will expand §4 in the revision to specify the algorithm (including correspondence establishment and interpolation), and to report ablation studies together with baseline comparisons that support the central empirical claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; forward pipeline of mesh conversion is self-contained

full rationale

The paper describes a constructive sequence—BioTac electrode signals converted to 3D deformation meshes, mesh transition to target sensor geometry, then rendering to output images—without any equations, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce to the inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the provided text to justify load-bearing steps. The central claim is a methodological translation framework whose validity rests on external deformation modeling and downstream task performance, not on internal redefinition or statistical forcing. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to the core domain assumption stated in the text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Sensor deformation information extracted from tactile signals forms a sufficient common representation for cross-modal translation between sensors with different output dimensionalities.
    This premise is invoked to justify the three-stage pipeline described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5762 in / 1205 out tokens · 47295 ms · 2026-05-23T17:25:26.162157+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tactile Sensing – From Humans to Humanoids,

    R. S. Dahiya, G. Metta, M. Valle, and G. Sandini, “Tactile Sensing – From Humans to Humanoids,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Visuo- Haptic Object Perception for Robots: An Overview,

    N. Navarro-Guerrero, S. Toprak, J. Josifovski, and L. Jamone, “Visuo- Haptic Object Perception for Robots: An Overview,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 377–403, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Biomimetic Tactile Sensor for Control of Grip,

    N. Wettels, D. Popovic, V . J. Santos, R. S. Johansson, and G. E. Loeb, “Biomimetic Tactile Sensor for Control of Grip,” in IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) , ser. 10th, 2007, pp. 923–932

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Multimodal Tactile Sensor,

    N. Wettels, J. A. Fishel, and G. E. Loeb, “Multimodal Tactile Sensor,” in The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development , ser. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Springer International Publishing, 2014, no. 95, pp. 405–429

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Optimizing BioTac Simulation for Realistic Tactile Perception,

    W. Zai El Amri and N. Navarro-Guerrero, “Optimizing BioTac Simulation for Realistic Tactile Perception,” in International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , Yokohama, Japan, June 2024, pp. 1–8

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    TactileGCN: A Graph Convolutional Network for Predicting Grasp Stability with Tactile Sensors,

    A. Garcia-Garcia, B. S. Zapata-Impata, S. Orts-Escolano, P. Gil, and J. Garcia-Rodriguez, “TactileGCN: A Graph Convolutional Network for Predicting Grasp Stability with Tactile Sensors,” in International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , 2019, pp. 1–8

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Learning Spatio Temporal Tactile Features with a ConvLSTM for the Direction Of Slip Detection,

    B. S. Zapata-Impata, P. Gil, and F. Torres, “Learning Spatio Temporal Tactile Features with a ConvLSTM for the Direction Of Slip Detection,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 523, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Tactile Identification of Objects Using Bayesian Exploration,

    D. Xu, G. E. Loeb, and J. A. Fishel, “Tactile Identification of Objects Using Bayesian Exploration,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2013, pp. 3056–3061

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    BiGS: BioTac Grasp Stability Dataset,

    Y . Chebotar, K. Hausman, Z. Su, A. Molchanov, O. Kroemer, G. Sukhatme, and S. Schaal, “BiGS: BioTac Grasp Stability Dataset,” in ICRA on Workshop on Grasping and Manipulation Datasets , 2016, p. 2

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Tactile-Based Slip Detection Towards Robot Grasping,

    Y . Gong, Y . Xing, J. Wu, and Z. Xiong, “Tactile-Based Slip Detection Towards Robot Grasping,” in Intelligent Robotics and Applications . Springer Nature, 2023, pp. 93–107

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Transferring Tactile Data Across Sensors,

    W. Zai El Amri, M. Kuhlmann, and N. Navarro-Guerrero, “Transferring Tactile Data Across Sensors,” in 40th Anniversary of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA@40) , Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Sept. 2024, pp. 1540–1542

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    DIGIT: A Novel Design for a Low-Cost Compact High- Resolution Tactile Sensor With Application to In-Hand Manipulation,

    M. Lambeta, P.-W. Chou, S. Tian, B. Yang, B. Maloon, V . R. Most, D. Stroud, R. Santos, A. Byagowi, G. Kammerer, D. Jayaraman, and R. Calandra, “DIGIT: A Novel Design for a Low-Cost Compact High- Resolution Tactile Sensor With Application to In-Hand Manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3838–3845, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Isaac Gym - Preview Release,

    “Isaac Gym - Preview Release,” https://developer.nvidia.com/isaac-gym

    work page

  14. [14]

    R. S. Dahiya and M. Valle, Robotic Tactile Sensing - Technologies and System. Springer Netherlands, 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    “Touching to See

    J. Lee, D. Bollegala, and S. Luo, ““Touching to See” and “Seeing to Feel”: Robotic Cross-Modal Sensory Data Generation for Visual-Tactile Perception,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019, pp. 4276–4282

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    ViTac: Feature Sharing Between Vision and Tactile Sensing for Cloth Texture Recognition,

    S. Luo, W. Yuan, E. Adelson, A. G. Cohn, and R. Fuentes, “ViTac: Feature Sharing Between Vision and Tactile Sensing for Cloth Texture Recognition,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2018, pp. 2722–2727

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    A Framework for Sensorimotor Cross-Perception and Cross-Behavior Knowledge Transfer for Object Categorization,

    G. Tatiya, R. Hosseini, M. C. Hughes, and J. Sinapov, “A Framework for Sensorimotor Cross-Perception and Cross-Behavior Knowledge Transfer for Object Categorization,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , vol. 7, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Interpreting and Predicting Tactile Signals for the SynTouch BioTac,

    Y . S. Narang, B. Sundaralingam, K. Van Wyk, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, “Interpreting and Predicting Tactile Signals for the SynTouch BioTac,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 40, no. 12-14, pp. 1467–1487, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Sim-to-Real for Robotic Tactile Sensing Via Physics-Based Simulation and Learned Latent Projections,

    Y . Narang, B. Sundaralingam, M. Macklin, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, “Sim-to-Real for Robotic Tactile Sensing Via Physics-Based Simulation and Learned Latent Projections,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , 2021, pp. 6444–6451

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering,

    M. Defferrard, X. Bresson, and P. Vandergheynst, “Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering,” in International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 30th. Curran Associates Inc., 2016, pp. 3844–3852

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Generating 3D Faces Using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoders,

    A. Ranjan, T. Bolkart, S. Sanyal, and M. J. Black, “Generating 3D Faces Using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoders,” in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , ser. LNCS. Munich, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2018, vol. 11207, pp. 725–741

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Learning to Synthesize V olumetric Meshes from Vision-based Tactile Imprints,

    X. Zhu, S. Jain, M. Tomizuka, and J. Van Baar, “Learning to Synthesize V olumetric Meshes from Vision-based Tactile Imprints,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . Philadelphia, PA, USA: IEEE, May 2022, pp. 4833–4839

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    GelSlim 3.0: High-Resolution Measurement of Shape, Force and Slip in a Compact Tactile-Sensing Finger,

    I. H. Taylor, S. Dong, and A. Rodriguez, “GelSlim 3.0: High-Resolution Measurement of Shape, Force and Slip in a Compact Tactile-Sensing Finger,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Philadelphia, PA, USA: IEEE, May 2022, pp. 10 781–10 787

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    TACTO: A Fast, Flexible, and Open-Source Simulator for High-Resolution Vision-Based Tactile Sensors,

    S. Wang, M. Lambeta, P.-W. Chou, and R. Calandra, “TACTO: A Fast, Flexible, and Open-Source Simulator for High-Resolution Vision-Based Tactile Sensors,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3930–3937, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Mmatl/pyrender: Easy-to-use glTF 2.0-compliant OpenGL renderer for visualization of 3D scenes

    “Mmatl/pyrender: Easy-to-use glTF 2.0-compliant OpenGL renderer for visualization of 3D scenes.” https://github.com/mmatl/pyrender

    work page

  26. [26]

    Taxim: An Example-Based Simulation Model for GelSight Tactile Sensors,

    Z. Si and W. Yuan, “Taxim: An Example-Based Simulation Model for GelSight Tactile Sensors,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2361–2368, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Beta-V AE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework,

    I. Higgins, L. Matthey, A. Pal, C. Burgess, X. Glorot, M. Botvinick, S. Mohamed, and A. Lerchner, “Beta-V AE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Simu- lation of the SynTouch BioTac Sensor,

    P. Ruppel, Y . Jonetzko, M. G¨orner, N. Hendrich, and J. Zhang, “Simu- lation of the SynTouch BioTac Sensor,” in International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS) , ser. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 867. Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 374–387

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Fluid-Structure Interactions of Peripheral Arteries Using a Coupled in Silico and in Vitro Approach,

    S. Schoenborn, T. Lorenz, K. Kuo, D. F. Fletcher, M. A. Woodruff, S. Pirola, and M. C. Allenby, “Fluid-Structure Interactions of Peripheral Arteries Using a Coupled in Silico and in Vitro Approach,” Computers in Biology and Medicine , vol. 165, p. 107474, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    A Biomimetic Fingerprint for Robotic Tactile Sensing,

    O. A. Jui ˜na Quilacham´ın and N. Navarro-Guerrero, “A Biomimetic Fingerprint for Robotic Tactile Sensing,” in International Symposium on Robotics (ISR Europe) . Stuttgart, Germany: VDE Verlag GmbH, Sept. 2023, pp. 112–118

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Recent Progress in Technologies for Tactile Sensors,

    C. Chi, X. Sun, N. Xue, T. Li, and C. Liu, “Recent Progress in Technologies for Tactile Sensors,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 948, 2018

    work page 2018