Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sparse Upcycling: Inference Inefficient Finetuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.08968 v1 pith:KKPCJMQ5 submitted 2024-11-13 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords inferencemodelqualitysparseupcyclingefficiencymodelspretraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Small, highly trained, open-source large language models are widely used due to their inference efficiency, but further improving their quality remains a challenge. Sparse upcycling is a promising approach that transforms a pretrained dense model into a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, increasing the model's parameter count and quality. In this work, we compare the effectiveness of sparse upcycling against continued pretraining (CPT) across different model sizes, compute budgets, and pretraining durations. Our experiments show that sparse upcycling can achieve better quality, with improvements of over 20% relative to CPT in certain scenarios. However, this comes with a significant inference cost, leading to 40% slowdowns in high-demand inference settings for larger models. Our findings highlight the trade-off between model quality and inference efficiency, offering insights for practitioners seeking to balance model quality and deployment constraints.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Fine-Grained MoE Beyond 50B Parameters: Empirical Evaluation and Practical Insights

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 56B total parameters, fine-grained MoE with smaller, more numerous experts beats standard Switch and Mixtral-style MoE on validation loss and average downstream accuracy at matched FLOPs.

Pith tools