Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

LES-Talker: Fine-Grained Emotion Editing for Talking Head Generation in Linear Emotion Space

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Emotion editing for talking heads can be reduced to vector operations in a 41-dimensional linear space.

desk verdict A promising representation for emotion editing, but the claimed proofs of linearity and isolation don't hold up; the fine-grained level control is plausible but under-validated. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09268 v2 pith:VGDCZQYB submitted 2024-11-14 cs.CV

Guanwen Feng , Zhihao Qian , Yunan Li , Siyu Jin , Qiguang Miao , Chi-Man Pun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords talkingheadgenerationemotioneditingLinearSpaceFacialActionUnits3Dmorphablemodelcross-dimensionattentionone-shotsynthesisaudio-drivenvideo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that fine-grained, interpretable emotion editing in talking-head videos can be achieved by treating emotion transformations as vector operations in a 41-dimensional Linear Emotion Space built on Facial Action Units. The proposed model, LES-Talker, takes a single identity image plus audio (or an AU source) and produces a talking-head video whose emotion type, intensity level, and individual facial-unit movements are all specified by a user. If the central claim holds, the value is practical interpretability: each coordinate in the emotion space has a physical meaning, so an edit such as "make it angry at level 2.5" or "raise the brow more" becomes a transparent vector change rather than an opaque latent-code manipulation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the 41-dimensional Linear Emotion Space and the Cross-Dimension Attention Net. The space is assembled from Facial Action Units: the Action Subspace $A$ holds the 17 standardized AU amplitudes, the Isolation Subspace $I$ holds 17 per-emotion AU fluctuation magnitudes plus a 7-channel one-hot emotion-type indicator, and the distance between the isolation coordinates encodes the emotion-level tendency. The identity that carries the argument is the Emotion Injector's linear interpolation rule between anchor vectors, $u_{\text{emo,level}} = (u_{\text{emo,i}} - u_{\text{emo,j}})(\text{level}-j) + u_{\text{emo,j}}$, followed by the addition $u' = u_{\text{inj}} + u$, which makes "emotion level" a continuous vector displacement. CDAN is the mechanism that maps these LES vectors to 3DMM coefficients: it builds a joint coefficient matrix between a LES vector and the 64-dimensional expression coefficient vector, applies matrix attention and an MLP path in parallel, and is used in series and parallel for the two subspaces so that the LES representation guides 3D face deformation.

What would settle it

Render the same identity with one emotion at levels 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 using the Emotion Injector, run an independent AU detector on the frames, and check whether the detected AU-vector distance from the neutral frame grows approximately linearly with the injected level; additionally, compute the claimed inequality $I_{pd} \le od \cdot \sqrt{2} \le O_{pd}$ on held-out emotion pairs and see whether any pair violates it. Failure of either check would contradict the linear-space assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that emotion transformations in talking-head synthesis reduce to affine vector arithmetic in a carefully constructed space. The Linear Emotion Space writes each frame as a 41-dimensional point, whose first 17 coordinates are standardized Facial Action Unit amplitudes (the Action Subspace) and whose remaining 24 coordinates encode per-emotion AU fluctuations and a one-hot emotion-type channel (the Isolation Subspace). Given anchor feature vectors for eight emotions at three base intensity levels plus neutral, the Emotion Injector linearly interpolates between anchors to obtain the requested level's vector, subtracts the neutral vector, and adds the difference to the source frame's vector. The Cross-Dimension Attention Net then translates these edited vectors into 3DMM expression coefficients, with one network handling the Action Subspace and a second, serially linked network handling the Isolation Subspace. The paper claims this yields fine-grained editing across 8 emotion types, 17 facial units, and continuous levels above 0, with visual quality that beats mainstream emotion-driven talking-head methods.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that emotion intensity is a linear coordinate in the 41-dimensional space, so that interpolating between the training dataset's three anchor intensity levels yields the requested emotion at every intermediate level; the paper states this as a hypothesis and does not prove the companion inequality that should keep different emotions geometrically separate as intensity grows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the LES linearity holds, any emotion at any continuous level can be synthesized by interpolation or extrapolation between the three base anchor levels, without retraining for new levels.
  • A user can independently steer single facial units by biasing the corresponding coordinate in the Action Subspace, which the paper demonstrates for nearly all 17 AUs.
  • The same pipeline works either audio-driven or video-driven: with an AU source it applies per-frame editing, and without one it predicts AUs from audio, so deployment does not require a driving video.
  • Because each LES coordinate corresponds to a named AU or an emotion-type channel, the editing procedure is interpretable: an edit is a coordinate change with a physical meaning, not a random latent-space interpolation.
  • The Isolation Subspace's one-hot emotion channel and origin distance are designed to keep different emotions separable as intensity increases, so the method should avoid collapsing into a generic "happy-like" expression at high levels; ablations show collapsing when these components are removed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the linearity hypothesis could be tested more directly than the provided validation: an independent, pre-trained AU/emotion recognizer scoring generated frames at many levels would show whether perceived intensity is monotonic in the injected level.
  • The paper asserts, rather than proves, the separation inequality between emotion vectors; computing the actual inner and outer distance distributions on held-out emotions would show whether the Isolation Subspace keeps every emotion pair apart at every level.
  • A testable extension is to attach the same LES construction to other face-animation backbones, such as 3D Gaussian splatting renderers, since the space is defined statistically from AU distributions rather than from the specific renderer used here.
  • Another extension is to train or evaluate with continuous emotion-intensity annotations instead of the three discrete base levels, which would reveal whether the interpolation rule generalizes beyond the anchor structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes LES-Talker, a one-shot talking head generation method for fine-grained emotion editing across emotion type, emotion level, and individual facial action units. The central idea is a 41-dimensional Linear Emotion Space (LES) built from Action Units, split into an Action Subspace (A, 17 dims) and an Isolation Subspace (I, 24 dims), in which emotion transformations are represented as vector additions. A Cross-Dimension Attention Net (CDAN) maps LES vectors and 3DMM coefficients to controllable facial deformations. The method is evaluated on MEAD, CREMA-D, HDTF, and a diverse dataset, with quantitative quality metrics, lip-sync metrics, ablations, and two user studies. The paper claims that LES-Talker outperforms existing emotion-driven talking head methods and offers interpretable continuous emotion-level control.

Significance. If the central linearity assumption is genuinely validated, the LES formulation would be a valuable step toward interpretable fine-grained emotion editing in talking head generation, replacing coarse discrete emotion labels with explicit, AU-grounded vector operations. The paper has several genuine strengths: the LES definition is explicit and physically motivated; the two-level CDAN architecture and the coarse-to-fine training strategy are described concretely; the appendix provides inference algorithms that clarify the actual control flow; and the experiments cover multiple datasets, cross-identity/cross-dataset AU editing, and ablations. However, the paper's headline capability—continuous, fine-grained emotion-level editing—rests on an untested linearity hypothesis, and the two 'proofs' in Sec. 3.2 do not establish it. The empirical validation of intermediate emotion levels is currently weak, so the main claim is not yet supported to the standard that the paper's language promises.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (8), (22)-(24)]
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (12)]
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (16)]
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Table 2]
  5. [Sec. 4.2, Fig. 9 and Appendix C.3]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (12)]
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (1)]
  3. [Sec. 4.2]
  4. [Appendix D.2, Algorithm 2]
  5. [Sec. 4.1, Table 1]

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fine-grained level control is constructed by interpolating fitted anchors; the t-SNE validation re-encodes the model's own LES inputs, so the continuous-level claim partially reduces to its own construction.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.2 'Linear Emotion Space' (hypotheses and Eq. 8); Sec. 3.4 'Emotion Injector' (Eqs. 21-24)]
    "The Linear Emotion Space is based on two hypotheses: (1) The space containing w is linear. (2) The level of emotion intemo varies linearly in this space. ... based on Eq. 8, when user's control label is (emo, level), the transformation is as follows: i = ⌈level⌉ j = ⌊level⌋ uf emo,level = (uf emo,i − uf emo,j)·(level − j)+uf emo,j ... u′ = uinj + u"

    The continuous level coordinate is not derived or independently measured; it is the defining assumption of LES. Eq. 22 constructs the level-L representation as a linear interpolation between MEAD-fitted anchor vectors, and Eq. 24 injects it. Therefore, the claimed ability to 'achieve' a requested intermediate level is true by construction within LES: the output vector is defined to sit at that linearly interpolated level. Demonstrations that re-encoded frames track the requested level (Fig. 7, Fig. 9) are consistency checks with the same construction, not independent verification. The only external evidence, Table 2, is a 15-participant user study showing saturation (requested 2.50 yields perceived 2.10 on average).

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.2 'Editing Effectiveness', 'Space Visualization']
    "We generated 1,755 videos across five emotions, with levels from 0 to 4 in steps of 0.0114. Each video's frames were transformed into 41-dimensional LES representations and averaged, followed by t-SNE for dimensionality reduction. In Fig. 9, we can observe that the spatial representation reveals a clear emotional gradient and distinct separation between emotions."

    The videos are generated by injecting LES vectors defined in Eqs. 22-24, which are linear combinations of the MEAD-fitted anchors from Eqs. 9-10. The 'LES representations' used for the t-SNE are computed with the same Opt1/Opt2 mappings and the same anchor statistics. Re-encoding the model's own outputs into the same space therefore mainly restates the injected construction: the observed emotional gradient is expected if the renderer preserves the input vector, not an independent confirmation that requested levels correspond to human-perceived intensity. The independent user-study evidence (Table 2) is limited and already indicates level saturation.

full rationale

The paper's visual-quality comparisons (FID, SSIM, PSNR, CPBD) against external baselines (EAMM, EVP, EAT, SadTalker) are self-contained and not circular, and the CDAN/3DMM rendering pipeline is a genuine learned component whose fidelity is not guaranteed by construction. However, the central fine-grained continuous-level claim rests on Eq. 8, which the paper itself labels a hypothesis, and the Emotion Injector implements exactly that hypothesis via linear interpolation of fitted anchors. The t-SNE validation in Sec. 4.2 re-encodes LES-Talker's own generations into the same LES, making the 'emotional gradient' a self-confirming restatement of the injection rule. The only non-circular validation of perceived level is the small user study (Table 2), which shows a monotonic but saturating trend rather than precise continuous control. I also note, as correctness risk rather than circularity, that the 'Isolation Proof' asserts Ipd ≤ od·√2 ≤ Opd without defining Ipd/Opd or showing the required conditions, and the 'Effectiveness Proof' uses a CLT test at n=45,000 on autocorrelated frames, so it only establishes nonzero anchors. No load-bearing self-citation chain appears: the authors' own EmoSpeaker [16] is cited only in related work. Overall, the continuous-level claim partially reduces by construction and by self-consistent re-encoding, justifying a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on a set of data-fitted anchors and normalization statistics, plus several unproved geometric assumptions about emotion linearity and separation. The 41-dimensional LES is a new construction with no independent empirical handle, and the network weights learned from MEAD are additional fitted components. This ledger shows that the interpretable 'linear emotion space' is more of a useful re-parameterization of training data than a derived law.

free parameters (4)
  • Per-AU dataset statistics μ_D and σ_D (Eq. 9) = Not reported numerically
    Opt1 standardizes AU values using the mean and standard deviation computed over the whole dataset; these values define the coordinate system of the Action Subspace and are fitted to MEAD.
  • Per-emotion per-AU statistics σ_emo (Eq. 14) = Not reported numerically
    Opt2 divides |AU| by the per-emotion standard deviation to construct Isolation Subspace coordinates; these statistics are fitted to the data.
  • Feature anchor vectors u^f_emo,level (Eqs. 10-11) = 22 vectors, values not reported
    Averaged LES vectors for 8 emotions including neutral at MEAD levels 0-3. The Emotion Injector interpolates and extrapolates these anchors to produce every edited expression, so all fine-grained edits reduce to these fitted anchors.
  • Outlier significance threshold (Eq. 12) = 0.0155
    Chosen from Z=3.291 and n=45,000 to decide which AUs are outliers in the outlier matrix. The choice of confidence level affects the matrix but is ancillary to the main edit.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The space containing the constructed AU vectors is linear (LES hypothesis 1, Sec. 3.2).
    No evidence is given that facial-expression coordinates support linear superpositions; the paper asserts it as a hypothesis.
  • ad hoc to paper Emotion level varies linearly in LES (Eq. 8).
    The interpolation formula in Eq. 22 is only justified if level is a linear coordinate. The user-study table shows perceived levels increase, but not that the relation is linear.
  • ad hoc to paper The intra/inter-emotion distance inequality Ipd ≤ od·√2 ≤ Opd holds (Eq. 16).
    Used to claim emotion isolation is guaranteed; no derivation is supplied, and the inequality is not implied by the definitions alone.
  • domain assumption Central Limit Theorem applies to AU frame values with n=45,000 in the outlier test (Eq. 12).
    CLT requires near-independence; the paper itself notes frame-to-frame AU correlation within a video, so the i.i.d. assumption is violated, making the statistical 'proof' fragile.
  • domain assumption OpenFace AU extraction and Deep3D 3DMM reconstruction return sufficient and faithful estimates (Sec. 3.4, 4.1).
    All LES vectors and coefficients are computed from these tools; errors in AU or 3DMM estimation propagate into the emotion editing.
  • standard math 3DMM expression basis U_exp is orthonormal and expressive enough for emotion editing (Eq. 1, from Blanz and Vetter).
    Standard 3DMM assumption adopted from prior work.
invented entities (2)
  • Linear Emotion Space (LES): a 41-dimensional vector space with Action Subspace A (17 dims) and Isolation Subspace I (24 dims).
    purpose: Represent emotions as vectors so that interpolating and adding vectors edits the expression in an interpretable way.
    No falsifiable prediction outside the paper; validation consists of the model's own outputs re-encoded into the same space.
  • Isolation Subspace one-hot emotion channels e35-e41 and origin distance od.
    purpose: Isolate emotion identity and overall intensity beyond action units.
    An internal construction used to separate emotions; no external anchor.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LES-Talker: Fine-Grained Emotion Editing for Talking Head Generation in Linear Emotion Space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VGDCZQYB

@misc{pith2026241109268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LES-Talker: Fine-Grained Emotion Editing for Talking Head Generation in Linear Emotion Space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VGDCZQYB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09268}
}
read the original abstract

While existing one-shot talking head generation models have achieved progress in coarse-grained emotion editing, there is still a lack of fine-grained emotion editing models with high interpretability. We argue that for an approach to be considered fine-grained, it needs to provide clear definitions and sufficiently detailed differentiation. We present LES-Talker, a novel one-shot talking head generation model with high interpretability, to achieve fine-grained emotion editing across emotion types, emotion levels, and facial units. We propose a Linear Emotion Space (LES) definition based on Facial Action Units to characterize emotion transformations as vector transformations. We design the Cross-Dimension Attention Net (CDAN) to deeply mine the correlation between LES representation and 3D model representation. Through mining multiple relationships across different feature and structure dimensions, we enable LES representation to guide the controllable deformation of 3D model. In order to adapt the multimodal data with deviations to the LES and enhance visual quality, we utilize specialized network design and training strategies. Experiments show that our method provides high visual quality along with multilevel and interpretable fine-grained emotion editing, outperforming mainstream methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09268 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Linear Emotion Space (LES) based on Facial Action Units (AUs) supports our LES-Talker model, offering exceptional inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pipeline of LES-Talker. Inputs include an identity image, audio, optional AU Source, and user editing targets. The Linear Emotion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Part of the Outlier Matrix. Effectiveness Proof For a ufemo,level to effectively capture the distinction from the general situation, it should exhibit outlier values. In the same video, the correlation be￾tween u decreases rapidly as the frame interval increases, whereas in different videos, u is independent. Belonging to the same AU, the ei is identically distributed. We apply the Central Limit Theorem and hypothes… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Subspaces of Linear Emotion Space Action Subspace. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Structure of the Cross-Dimension Attention Net. Illus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Emotion Injector. encodes audio inputs into content vectors for further collab￾oration with Decoders. AU Decoder provides generative in￾put for vector w ∈ E when AU inputs are absent. Offset De￾coder enhances the predicted 3D coefficients by incorporat￾ing content …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fine-grained emotion editing. AU01: Inner Brow Raiser AU45: Blink DIVERSE-D CREMA-D MEAD HDTF AU04: Brow Lowerer AU05: Upper Lid Raiser AU07: Lid Tightener AU23: Lip Tightener AU25: Lips Part AU12: Lip Corner Puler AU06: Cheek Raiser AU20: Lip Stretcher AU09: Nose Wrin…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fine-grained AUs editing. shot method SadTalker, achieving superior visual quality. User Study. We conducted user studies with 15 partic￾ipants to evaluate our model across multiple metrics (rated 1–5) compared to other methods, as detailed in Tab.1. Our method outperf…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: t-SNE Visualization. Ours Sad Talker EAMM EVP PC-AVS Target EA T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Generation in ablation study. ally, the absence of serial connection between two-level CDANs leads to poor performance. The incomplete meth￾ods shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Visual quality comparison. 4.4. Ablation Study. We conducted ablation studies in multiple conditions to comprehensively demonstrate the contribution. Addition￾Emo Type Emo Level 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 Angry 0.87 1.20 1.60 1.80 1.84 Happy 0.83 1.41 1.77 2.00 2.23 Sad…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The complete outlier matrix. this training approach provides more precise facial action control. Fine Training: As using only AUs is insufficient, facial expressions beyond AUs need to be further adjusted through the Isolation Subspace in the fine training. Freeze the…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Unbalanced distribution before standardization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Od distribution in ISO Subspace. C. Further Experiment C.1. Facial Landmark Distance As shown in Tab. 7, we utilized the Facial Landmark Dis￾tance (FLD) based on 3DMM coefficients, randomly select￾ing 200 frames for evaluation. Initially, we tested the Action Subspace…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Generation in ablation study. 4 0 angry 4 0 contempt 4 0 happy 4 0 sad 4 0 surprised Left View Right View Top View [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Multi-perspective visualization of the generated results using t-SNE downscaling. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FaceEditTalker: Controllable Talking Head Generation with Facial Attribute Editing

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single framework can edit predefined facial attributes in audio-synchronized talking head videos while preserving identity and lip-sync quality.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Facetalk: Audio-driven motion diffusion for neural parametric head models

    Shivangi Aneja, Justus Thies, Angela Dai, and Matthias Nießner. Facetalk: Audio-driven motion diffusion for neural parametric head models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 21263–21273, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations

    Alexei Baevski, Yuhao Zhou, Abdelrahman Mohamed, and Michael Auli. wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, 33:12449–12460, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Openface: an open source facial behavior anal- ysis toolkit

    Tadas Baltru ˇsaitis, Peter Robinson, and Louis-Philippe Morency. Openface: an open source facial behavior anal- ysis toolkit. In 2016 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), pages 1–10. IEEE, 2016. 5, 6

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces

    V olker Blanz and Thomas Vetter. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Tech- niques, page 187–194, USA, 1999. ACM Press/Addison- Wesley Publishing Co. 4

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Crema-d: Crowd-sourced emotional multimodal actors dataset

    Houwei Cao, David G Cooper, Michael K Keutmann, Ruben C Gur, Ani Nenkova, and Ragini Verma. Crema-d: Crowd-sourced emotional multimodal actors dataset. IEEE transactions on affective computing, 5(4):377–390, 2014. 6

    2014

  6. [6]

    Emotalkinggaussian: Con- tinuous emotion-conditioned talking head synthesis

    Junuk Cha, Seongro Yoon, Valeriya Strizhkova, Francois Bremond, and Seungryul Baek. Emotalkinggaussian: Con- tinuous emotion-conditioned talking head synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00654, 2025. 2

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Diffsheg: A diffusion-based approach for real-time speech-driven holistic 3d expression and ges- ture generation

    Junming Chen, Yunfei Liu, Jianan Wang, Ailing Zeng, Yu Li, and Qifeng Chen. Diffsheg: A diffusion-based approach for real-time speech-driven holistic 3d expression and ges- ture generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 7352– 7361, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    3d face reconstruction and gaze tracking in the hmd for virtual interaction

    Shu-Yu Chen, Yu-Kun Lai, Shihong Xia, Paul L Rosin, and Lin Gao. 3d face reconstruction and gaze tracking in the hmd for virtual interaction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 25:3166–3179, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Videoretalking: Audio-based lip synchronization for talking head video editing in the wild

    Kun Cheng, Xiaodong Cun, Yong Zhang, Menghan Xia, Fei Yin, Mingrui Zhu, Xuan Wang, Jue Wang, and Nannan Wang. Videoretalking: Audio-based lip synchronization for talking head video editing in the wild. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers, pages 1–9, 2022. 3

    2022

  2. [10]

    Gaus- siantalker: Real-time talking head synthesis with 3d gaus- sian splatting

    Kyusun Cho, Joungbin Lee, Heeji Yoon, Yeobin Hong, Jaehoon Ko, Sangjun Ahn, and Seungryong Kim. Gaus- siantalker: Real-time talking head synthesis with 3d gaus- sian splatting. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 10985–10994, 2024. 2

    2024

  3. [11]

    Out of time: auto- mated lip sync in the wild

    Joon Son Chung and Andrew Zisserman. Out of time: auto- mated lip sync in the wild. In Computer Vision–ACCV 2016 Workshops: ACCV 2016 International Workshops, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part II 13, pages 251–263. Springer, 2017. 6

    2016

  4. [12]

    Accurate 3d face reconstruction with weakly-supervised learning: From single image to image set

    Yu Deng, Jiaolong Yang, Sicheng Xu, Dong Chen, Yunde Jia, and Xin Tong. Accurate 3d face reconstruction with weakly-supervised learning: From single image to image set. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition workshops, pages 0–0,...

    2019

  5. [13]

    Megaportraits: One-shot megapixel neural head avatars

    Nikita Drobyshev, Jenya Chelishev, Taras Khakhulin, Alek- sei Ivakhnenko, Victor Lempitsky, and Egor Zakharov. Megaportraits: One-shot megapixel neural head avatars. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 2663–2671, 2022. 2

    2022

  6. [14]

    Facial action coding system

    Paul Ekman and Wallace V Friesen. Facial action coding system. Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior,

  7. [15]

    Facial action coding system affect interpretation dictionary (facsaid)

    P Ekman, E Rosenberg, and J Hager. Facial action coding system affect interpretation dictionary (facsaid). In., 1998. 2

    1998

  8. [16]

    Emospeaker: One-shot fine-grained emotion-controlled talking face generation

    Guanwen Feng, Haoran Cheng, Yunan Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Chaoneng Li, Zhihao Qian, Qiguang Miao, and Chi-Man Pun. Emospeaker: One-shot fine-grained emotion-controlled talking face generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01422 ,

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Emfacs-7: Emotional facial action coding system

    Wallace V Friesen, Paul Ekman, et al. Emfacs-7: Emotional facial action coding system. Unpublished manuscript, Uni- versity of California at San Francisco, 2(36):1, 1983. 2

    1983

  10. [18]

    Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation

    Yuan Gan, Zongxin Yang, Xihang Yue, Lingyun Sun, and Yi Yang. Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22634– 22645, 2023. 2, 8

    2023

  11. [19]

    Ad-nerf: Audio driven neural ra- diance fields for talking head synthesis

    Yudong Guo, Keyu Chen, Sen Liang, Yong-Jin Liu, Hujun Bao, and Juyong Zhang. Ad-nerf: Audio driven neural ra- diance fields for talking head synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 5784–5794, 2021. 2

    2021

  12. [20]

    Diffted: One-shot audio-driven ted talk video generation with diffusion-based co-speech ges- tures

    Steven Hogue, Chenxu Zhang, Hamza Daruger, Yapeng Tian, and Xiaohu Guo. Diffted: One-shot audio-driven ted talk video generation with diffusion-based co-speech ges- tures. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1922–1931,

    1922

  13. [21]

    Audio-driven emotional video portraits

    Xinya Ji, Hang Zhou, Kaisiyuan Wang, Wayne Wu, Chen Change Loy, Xun Cao, and Feng Xu. Audio-driven emotional video portraits. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 14080–14089, 2021. 8

    2021

  14. [22]

    Eamm: One-shot emotional talking face via audio-based emotion-aware motion model

    Xinya Ji, Hang Zhou, Kaisiyuan Wang, Qianyi Wu, Wayne Wu, Feng Xu, and Xun Cao. Eamm: One-shot emotional talking face via audio-based emotion-aware motion model. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings , pages 1–10, 2022. 2, 8

    2022

  15. [23]

    Float: Generative motion latent flow matching for audio-driven talking portrait

    Taekyung Ki, Dongchan Min, and Gyoungsu Chae. Float: Generative motion latent flow matching for audio-driven talking portrait. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01064, 2024. 2

    2024

  16. [24]

    Efficient region-aware neural radiance fields for high-fidelity talking portrait synthesis

    Jiahe Li, Jiawei Zhang, Xiao Bai, Jun Zhou, and Lin Gu. Efficient region-aware neural radiance fields for high-fidelity talking portrait synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 7568– 7578, 2023. 2

    2023

  17. [25]

    Talkinggaussian: Structure-persistent 3d talking head synthesis via gaussian splatting

    Jiahe Li, Jiawei Zhang, Xiao Bai, Jin Zheng, Xin Ning, Jun Zhou, and Lin Gu. Talkinggaussian: Structure-persistent 3d talking head synthesis via gaussian splatting. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 127–145. Springer,

  18. [26]

    Moee: Mixture of emotion experts for audio-driven portrait animation

    Huaize Liu, Wenzhang Sun, Donglin Di, Shibo Sun, Jiahui Yang, Changqing Zou, and Hujun Bao. Moee: Mixture of emotion experts for audio-driven portrait animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01808, 2025. 3

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Li-net: Large-pose identity-preserving face reenactment network

    Jin Liu, Peng Chen, Tao Liang, Zhaoxing Li, Cai Yu, Shuqiao Zou, Jiao Dai, and Jizhong Han. Li-net: Large-pose identity-preserving face reenactment network. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) , pages 1–6. IEEE, 2021. 2

    2021

  20. [28]

    Styletalk: One-shot talking head generation with controllable speaking styles

    Yifeng Ma, Suzhen Wang, Zhipeng Hu, Changjie Fan, Tangjie Lv, Yu Ding, Zhidong Deng, and Xin Yu. Styletalk: One-shot talking head generation with controllable speaking styles. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1896–1904, 2023. 2

    1904

  21. [29]

    Emotalk: Speech-driven emotional disentanglement for 3d face anima- tion

    Ziqiao Peng, Haoyu Wu, Zhenbo Song, Hao Xu, Xiangyu Zhu, Jun He, Hongyan Liu, and Zhaoxin Fan. Emotalk: Speech-driven emotional disentanglement for 3d face anima- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 20687–20697, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  22. [30]

    A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild

    KR Prajwal, Rudrabha Mukhopadhyay, Vinay P Nambood- iri, and CV Jawahar. A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia , pages 484–492, 2020. 3

    2020

  23. [31]

    Talking head generation based on 3d morphable facial model

    Hsin-Yu Shen and Wen-Jiin Tsai. Talking head generation based on 3d morphable facial model. In2024 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2024. 2

    2024

  24. [32]

    Sd-nerf: Towards lifelike talking head animation via spatially-adaptive dual-driven nerfs

    Shuai Shen, Wanhua Li, Xiaoke Huang, Zheng Zhu, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Sd-nerf: Towards lifelike talking head animation via spatially-adaptive dual-driven nerfs. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023. 2

    2023

  25. [33]

    Diffusion-based signed distance fields for 3d shape gener- ation

    Jaehyeok Shim, Changwoo Kang, and Kyungdon Joo. Diffusion-based signed distance fields for 3d shape gener- ation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition , pages 20887–20897,

  26. [34]

    Diffposetalk: Speech-driven stylistic 3d facial animation and head pose generation via diffusion models

    Zhiyao Sun, Tian Lv, Sheng Ye, Matthieu Lin, Jenny Sheng, Yu-Hui Wen, Minjing Yu, and Yong-jin Liu. Diffposetalk: Speech-driven stylistic 3d facial animation and head pose generation via diffusion models. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(4):1–9, 2024. 2

    2024

  27. [35]

    Fg- emotalk: Talking head video generation with fine-grained controllable facial expressions

    Zhaoxu Sun, Yuze Xuan, Fang Liu, and Yang Xiang. Fg- emotalk: Talking head video generation with fine-grained controllable facial expressions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 5043–5051,

  28. [36]

    Emmn: Emotional motion memory network for audio-driven emotional talking face generation

    Shuai Tan, Bin Ji, and Ye Pan. Emmn: Emotional motion memory network for audio-driven emotional talking face generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22146–22156, 2023. 2

    2023

  29. [37]

    Edtalk: Effi- cient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis

    Shuai Tan, Bin Ji, Mengxiao Bi, and Ye Pan. Edtalk: Effi- cient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01647, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Progressive disentangled representation learning for fine-grained controllable talking head synthesis

    Duomin Wang, Yu Deng, Zixin Yin, Heung-Yeung Shum, and Baoyuan Wang. Progressive disentangled representation learning for fine-grained controllable talking head synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17979–17989, ...

    2023

  31. [39]

    Emotivetalk: Expressive talking head generation through audio information decoupling and emotional video diffusion

    Haotian Wang, Yuzhe Weng, Yueyan Li, Zilu Guo, Jun Du, Shutong Niu, Jiefeng Ma, Shan He, Xiaoyan Wu, Qiming Hu, et al. Emotivetalk: Expressive talking head generation through audio information decoupling and emotional video diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16726, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation

    Kaisiyuan Wang, Qianyi Wu, Linsen Song, Zhuoqian Yang, Wayne Wu, Chen Qian, Ran He, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation. In European Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 700–717. Springer, 2020. 2, 6, 8

    2020

  33. [41]

    One- shot talking face generation from single-speaker audio-visual correlation learning

    Suzhen Wang, Lincheng Li, Yu Ding, and Xin Yu. One- shot talking face generation from single-speaker audio-visual correlation learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2531–2539, 2022. 2

    2022

  34. [42]

    One-shot free-view neural talking-head synthesis for video conferenc- ing

    Ting-Chun Wang, Arun Mallya, and Ming-Yu Liu. One-shot free-view neural talking-head synthesis for video conferenc- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition , pages 10039–10049,

  35. [43]

    Omniavatar: Geometry-guided controllable 3d head synthesis

    Hongyi Xu, Guoxian Song, Zihang Jiang, Jianfeng Zhang, Yichun Shi, Jing Liu, Wanchun Ma, Jiashi Feng, and Lin- jie Luo. Omniavatar: Geometry-guided controllable 3d head synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1281...

    2023

  36. [44]

    Facial expression-aware talking head generation with 3d morphable model

    Zhijun Xu, Mingkun Zhang, and Dongyu Zhang. Facial expression-aware talking head generation with 3d morphable model. In 2024 5th International Seminar on Artificial In- telligence, Networking and Information Technology (AINIT), pages 1214–1217. IEEE, 2024. 2

    2024

  37. [45]

    Gaussiantalker: Speaker-specific talking head synthesis via 3d gaussian splatting

    Hongyun Yu, Zhan Qu, Qihang Yu, Jianchuan Chen, Zhonghua Jiang, Zhiwen Chen, Shengyu Zhang, Jimin Xu, Fei Wu, Chengfei Lv, et al. Gaussiantalker: Speaker-specific talking head synthesis via 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14037, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors

    Zhentao Yu, Zixin Yin, Deyu Zhou, Duomin Wang, Finn Wong, and Baoyuan Wang. Talking head generation with probabilistic audio-to-visual diffusion priors. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 7645–7655, 2023. 2

    2023

  39. [47]

    Dream-talk: Diffusion-based realistic emotional audio-driven method for single image talking face generation

    Chenxu Zhang, Chao Wang, Jianfeng Zhang, Hongyi Xu, Guoxian Song, You Xie, Linjie Luo, Yapeng Tian, Xiaohu Guo, and Jiashi Feng. Dream-talk: Diffusion-based realistic emotional audio-driven method for single image talking face generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13578, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio- driven single image talking face animation

    Wenxuan Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Xuan Wang, Yong Zhang, Xi Shen, Yu Guo, Ying Shan, and Fei Wang. Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio- driven single image talking face animation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and P...

    2023

  41. [49]

    A comparative study of perceptual quality metrics for audio-driven talking head videos

    Weixia Zhang, Chengguang Zhu, Jingnan Gao, Yichao Yan, Guangtao Zhai, and Xiaokang Yang. A comparative study of perceptual quality metrics for audio-driven talking head videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06421, 2024. 6

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Flow-guided one-shot talking face generation with a high-resolution audio-visual dataset

    Zhimeng Zhang, Lincheng Li, Yu Ding, and Changjie Fan. Flow-guided one-shot talking face generation with a high-resolution audio-visual dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3661–3670, 2021. 6

    2021

  43. [51]

    A reduced-reference quality assessment metric for textured mesh digital humans

    Zicheng Zhang, Yingjie Zhou, Chunyi Li, Kang Fu, Wei Sun, Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, and Guangtao Zhai. A reduced-reference quality assessment metric for textured mesh digital humans. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Process-...

    2024

  44. [52]

    Thin-plate spline motion model for image animation

    Jian Zhao and Hui Zhang. Thin-plate spline motion model for image animation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3657–3666, 2022. 2

    2022

  45. [53]

    Locally attentional sdf diffusion for controllable 3d shape generation

    Xin-Yang Zheng, Hao Pan, Peng-Shuai Wang, Xin Tong, Yang Liu, and Heung-Yeung Shum. Locally attentional sdf diffusion for controllable 3d shape generation. ACM Trans- actions on Graphics (ToG), 42(4):1–13, 2023. 2

    2023

  46. [54]

    Pose-controllable talking face generation by implicitly modularized audio-visual rep- resentation

    Hang Zhou, Yasheng Sun, Wayne Wu, Chen Change Loy, Xiaogang Wang, and Ziwei Liu. Pose-controllable talking face generation by implicitly modularized audio-visual rep- resentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4176–4186,

  47. [2021]

    2 Appendix A. Further Description of LES AUs Action Description AUs Action Description AU1 Inner Brow Raiser AU14 Dimpler AU2 Outer Brow Raiser AU15 Lip Corner Depressor AU4 Brow Lowerer AU17 Chin Raiser AU5 Upper Lid Raiser AU20 Lip Stretcher AU6 Cheek Raiser AU23 Lip Tighten...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.