Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Charge-Neutral Electronic Excitations in Quantum Insulators

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This perspective argues that charge-neutral electronic excitations define the frontier of quantum insulators, and that sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations in monolayer WTe2 support a neutral Fermi surface inside its charge gap.

desk verdict A readable, opinionated review of neutral excitations in insulators, whose flagship WTe2 claim outruns its theoretical support — worth refereeing, but the authors should own the interpretation more cautiously. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09496 v1 pith:4LVB7NLK submitted 2024-11-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sanfeng Wu , Leslie M. Schoop , Inti Sodemann , Roderich Moessner , Robert J. Cava , N. P. Ong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords charge-neutralexcitationsquantuminsulatorsexcitonicinsulatorneutralFermisurfacespinliquidthermoelectricoscillationsmonolayerWTe2Ioffe-Larkinrule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a perspective arguing that the deepest physics of quantum insulators lives in excitations that carry no electric charge—excitons, spinons, Majorana fermions, and other fractionalized quasiparticles—and that detecting them demands tools beyond electrical transport. It reviews the experimental front on three fronts: excitonic insulators, quantum spin liquids, and insulators with a neutral Fermi surface. Its sharpest concrete claim is that monolayer WTe2 at charge neutrality is an excitonic insulator whose magnetotransport and sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations point to a neutral Fermi surface inside the charge gap. If that claim holds, WTe2 becomes the first 2D insulator with a demonstrated neutral Fermi surface, and a testbed for the broader search for neutral excitations in correlated matter.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is the Ioffe-Larkin rule, which states that in a spin-charge separated system the physical resistivity is the sum of the spinon and chargon resistivities, so a thermopower measurement can respond to Landau quantization of neutral spinons even though no charged quasiparticle conducts. The experimental probe is the sign-changing Seebeck oscillation: in a two-dimensional electron gas, the thermopower flips sign each time a Landau level crosses the chemical potential, so the observed sign alternation in insulating WTe2 is read as the fingerprint of a Landau-quantized neutral Fermi surface inside the charge gap.

What would settle it

Replace the graphite gate in a monolayer WTe2 device with a metallic or hBN gate whose Landau levels cannot generate oscillations at the relevant fields; if the sign-alternating Seebeck oscillations with the same period and apparent carrier density above $10^{12}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ persist while the DC resistance stays above $100\,\mathrm{M}\Omega$, the neutral-Fermi-surface interpretation is supported, and if they vanish, the graphite-gate scenario is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is experimental: in the insulating state of monolayer WTe2, the Seebeck coefficient develops sign-alternating oscillations in a magnetic field with the same periods as the resistance oscillations, implying carrier densities above $10^{12}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ and mobilities over $1000\,\mathrm{cm^2\,V^{-1}s^{-1}}$—values incompatible with ordinary charge carriers in a material whose resistance exceeds $100\,\mathrm{M}\Omega$. The authors interpret this as Landau quantization of charge-neutral fermions that belong to the WTe2 monolayer itself, with the Ioffe-Larkin rule tying the thermopower of fractionalized components to the measured signal. They explicitly weigh two competing scenarios—carriers thermally activated across the gap, and carriers living in the graphite gate—and argue that the sign-changing thermoelectric data rule them out. At the same time, the paper states that an exact theory of a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization has not yet been developed.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations in monolayer WTe2 are Landau quantization of charge-neutral fermions inside the WTe2 itself, rather than an effect of the graphite gate, thermally activated carriers, or a field-dependent gap; the authors note that an exact formulation of a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization remains to be developed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monolayer WTe2 at charge neutrality is identified as a topological excitonic insulator, with gate-tunable tunneling spectra and chemical-potential measurements ruling out an ordinary band insulator.
  • The sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations imply that the highly mobile carriers responsible for the resistance oscillations belong to the WTe2 monolayer itself, not to the graphite gate, and are not simply carriers activated across the gap.
  • If the neutral Fermi surface picture is correct, Landau quantization can occur in an insulator that has no mobile charged carriers, extending a phenomenon previously observed only in metals to a new class of matter.
  • The same combination of resistance and thermoelectric quantum oscillations becomes a transferable diagnostic for other insulating candidates, including the Kitaev material alpha-RuCl3 and the monolayer 1T-TaS2/1T-TaSe2 spin-liquid candidates.
  • The phase diagram of monolayer WTe2 connects the excitonic insulator, the quantum spin Hall insulator, and a superconducting phase through an unconventional quantum critical point, so establishing the neutral Fermi surface sharpens the link between all three phenomena.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors leave implicit: if the oscillating carriers are neutral fermions with spin, an NV-center noise measurement on an insulating WTe2 device should detect a spinon Fermi surface's magnetic noise with the same magnetic-field period as the thermoelectric oscillations.
  • The sign-alternating Seebeck oscillations should be accompanied by an oscillatory Nernst signal with the same period, because a Landau-quantized neutral Fermi surface produces a transverse thermoelectric response; this is a test that could be run immediately on existing devices.
  • The perspective's criteria suggest a targeted materials search: small-gap 2D insulators with large exciton binding energies and quantum spin Hall edges—not only WTe2—should be screened by simultaneous transport and thermopower measurements for the same sign-changing oscillation signature.
  • If the graphite-gate scenario is fully excluded, the oscillation period should be independent of the gate material; comparing devices with graphite, metal, and hBN gates would directly isolate the WTe2 contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This perspective paper surveys charge-neutral electronic excitations in quantum insulators, focusing on three themes: excitonic insulators (with monolayer WTe2 as the flagship candidate), quantum spin liquids (notably α-RuCl3 and the 1T-TaS2/TaSe2 family), and the ongoing search for neutral Fermi surfaces inside a charge gap. The authors review the theoretical framework of fractionalization and emergent gauge fields (including the Ioffe-Larkin rule and Landau quantization of spinons), summarize recent experimental probes (transport, thermal transport, thermoelectric effect, scanning tunneling microscopy), and outline future directions involving new materials, new detection schemes, and quantum devices. The paper's most concrete claim is that sign-changing thermoelectric quantum oscillations in insulating monolayer WTe2 indicate highly mobile charge-neutral fermions belonging to the WTe2 itself, consistent with a neutral Fermi surface in an excitonic insulator, and that thermal conductivity oscillations in α-RuCl3 similarly point to neutral fermionic excitations.

Significance. If the WTe2 interpretation is correct, the paper identifies the first 2D demonstration of a neutral Fermi surface in an insulator, which would be a major advance in the study of fractionalized phases. The paper is a timely and well-organized perspective, with a broad reference list and a clear articulation of the central open problem. It also provides a useful summary of the ongoing α-RuCl3 thermal Hall and thermal conductivity debates. A notable strength is the explicit acknowledgment that an exact formulation for thermoelectric response in a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization is missing; this transparency is commendable. However, the central evidential claim is not established: the inference from sign-changing Seebeck oscillations to neutral-fermion Landau quantization relies on an unproven extension of the Ioffe-Larkin rule, and the dismissal of alternative scenarios is more definitive than the current evidence warrants.

major comments (3)
  1. [Case III (Search for Charge-Neutral Fermi Surfaces), WTe2 paragraph] The key inference from sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations to a neutral Fermi surface is load-bearing but not established. The manuscript states in the same paragraph that 'An exact formulation for such a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization remains to be developed,' which concedes that the Ioffe-Larkin rule has not been derived for thermoelectric response under Landau quantization. Without such a formulation, the sentence 'implying that the highly mobile carriers responsible for the QOs belong to WTe2 insulator itself and that a Landau-level like energy structure is developed' overstates the conclusion. The thermoelectric data are consistent with the neutral-fermion scenario, but they do not uniquely prove it. Please revise this passage to explicitly label the neutral Fermi surface interpretation as one possible explanation rather than a deduction, and specify what additional experiments (e.g., thermal transport, magnetic noise, or a microscopic theory of the thermopower) would be needed to distinguish it from conventional mechanisms.
  2. [Case III, WTe2 paragraph, scenario (i)] The dismissal of scenario (i) (thermally activated carriers) is supported only by the statement that the alternative scenarios 'are not supported by the thermoelectric data.' However, gap-oscillation models (refs 68 and 145) predict quantum oscillations in the activated conductivity of monolayer WTe2-like excitonic insulators, and the paper does not explain why a field-dependent gap cannot produce sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations as well. The argument would be substantially strengthened by a quantitative or at least a clear physical explanation of why the sign of the Seebeck coefficient is insensitive to gap oscillations in the activated regime, or by explicit modeling showing that the observed sign changes cannot arise from scenario (i). As written, the reader cannot tell whether the thermoelectric experiment truly rules out thermally activated carriers or simply is in tension with one particular version of that scenario.
  3. [Case II (Quantum Spin Liquids), α-RuCl3 oscillations] The discussion of the κxx oscillations in α-RuCl3 presents the intrinsic neutral-fermion interpretation as the favored one, while the stacking-fault cascade scenario (refs 117, 120) is argued against based on refs 121–123. The debate is ongoing, and the pseudoscalar spinon proposal (ref 116) is a speculative theoretical construct. For a perspective, it is acceptable to take a position, but the language 'Together, these studies strongly disfavor the cascading transition scenario' is too strong given that the alternative phonon-scattering explanation (mentioned later in the same paragraph) is not quantitatively ruled out. I recommend that the paper explicitly state that neither the neutral-fermion nor the phonon-scattering nor the stacking-fault interpretations is currently conclusive, and that the pseudoscalar spinon model is one of several theoretical possibilities rather than an established explanation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 3 caption and text] In the caption of Fig. 3, both the thermal Hall response and the thermal conductivity response are labeled as panel 'g'; the second should be panel 'h'. In the main text, the reference to 'Fig. 3g, thermal conductivity response' should similarly be 'Fig. 3h'.
  2. [References] References 78 and 131 are identical (He and Lee, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195155), and the duplicate should be consolidated or cross-referenced.
  3. [Box 1] The Kitaev Hamiltonian in Box 1 is garbled by the text extraction (subscripts and Greek indices are not rendered). The typeset equation should be checked to ensure it displays correctly in the published version.
  4. [Case II, α-RuCl3] The term 'pseudo-scalar spinons' is introduced without definition; a brief explanation or a direct pointer to ref 116 would make the discussion accessible to a broader readership.
  5. [Case III, WTe2] The key caveat 'An exact formulation for such a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization remains to be developed' appears after the strong 'implying' statement. Consider moving this caveat earlier in the paragraph so that the reader understands the limitation before the interpretation is presented.
  6. [Case III, WTe2] Typo: in 'puzzling Landan quantization problem' the word 'Landan' should be 'Landau'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a perspective with no derivation chain, and its central WTe2 interpretive step is explicitly acknowledged as an unformalized open problem rather than a result forced by construction.

full rationale

This paper is a perspective/review rather than a derivation-based research article. It contains no equations whose outputs are equivalent to their inputs, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no construction-level reduction of a claimed result to its assumptions. The most concrete interpretive claim — that sign-changing thermoelectric quantum oscillations in insulating monolayer WTe2 point to a charge-neutral Fermi surface — is presented as a natural interpretation of experimental data, but the paper explicitly concedes that the theoretical link is incomplete: 'An exact formulation for such a spin-charge separated insulator with Landau quantization remains to be developed.' That concession makes the step an acknowledged open assumption, not a circular derivation. The substantial self-citations (refs 66, 67, 75, 76, 110, 111) are used as experimental evidence from the authors' prior measurements; while this is heavy self-citation in a review context, it is not load-bearing circularity in the sense of a proof or prediction reducing to its own inputs. The paper also explicitly states that a conclusive demonstration of a neutral Fermi surface inside a charge gap remains an outstanding goal, further confirming that no circular claim of having established the result is being made. Therefore, no circular step meeting the required evidentiary standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central WTe2 neutral Fermi surface claim rests on a small number of parameters extracted from quantum oscillation data and on the theoretical assumption that emergent gauge fields couple to external fields. No genuinely new entities are introduced by this perspective; the discussion of pseudoscalar spinons refers to a proposal from the cited literature.

free parameters (4)
  • carrier density n = > 10^12 cm^-2
    Quoted from quantum oscillation data in ref 75 for insulating WTe2. The high n combined with low conductivity is the basis for the neutral fermion argument.
  • mobility mu = > 1000 cm^2 V^-1 s^-1
    Same source; high mobility contradicts the inequality sigma << n e mu, motivating the neutral fermion picture.
  • Chern number of lowest spin band = close to 1 above 9 T
    Obtained by fitting the Murakami expression to thermal Hall data in alpha-RuCl3 (ref 110). Used to support a topological boson picture.
  • inferred spin band energy = ~1 meV
    Extracted from the same thermal Hall fits (ref 110) and compared with ESR and microwave absorption experiments.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fractionalization in strongly interacting 2D systems produces quasiparticles with fractional quantum numbers and anyonic statistics.
    The entire perspective relies on this established but nontrivial property (FQH, RVB) to motivate searching for neutral excitations in insulators.
  • domain assumption Emergent U(1) gauge fields in spin liquids can couple to external magnetic fields, allowing Landau quantization of charge-neutral fermions.
    Cites refs 30 and 31. The WTe2 neutral Fermi surface interpretation depends on this prediction.
  • ad hoc to paper The sign-changing thermoelectric oscillations in the WTe2 monolayer are caused by Landau quantization of neutral fermions in the WTe2, not by the graphite gate or thermally activated carriers.
    This is the authors' interpretation of refs 76 and 151. The paper argues scenarios (i) and (ii) are unsupported, but does not provide a complete theory of thermopower in a spin-charge separated insulator.
  • domain assumption Monolayer WTe2 at charge neutrality is an excitonic insulator.
    Assigned based on refs 66 and 67. This assignment anchors the argument that neutral bosonic (excitonic) and fermionic excitations coexist in the same material.
invented entities (1)
  • pseudoscalar spinons
    purpose: Proposed neutral fermionic quasiparticles invoked to explain both the presence of thermal conductivity oscillations and the absence of thermal Hall conductivity in alpha-RuCl3 for H along the armchair axis.
    The review cites this as a proposal by Villadiego (ref 116) and notes no direct experimental confirmation. It is not the paper's own invention.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge-Neutral Electronic Excitations in Quantum Insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LVB7NLK

@misc{pith2026241109496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge-Neutral Electronic Excitations in Quantum Insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LVB7NLK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09496}
}
read the original abstract

Experiments on quantum materials have uncovered many interesting quantum phases ranging from superconductivity to a variety of topological quantum matter including the recently observed fractional quantum anomalous Hall insulators. The findings have come in parallel with the development of approaches to probe the rich excitations inherent in such systems. In contrast to observing electrically charged excitations, the detection of charge-neutral electronic excitations in condensed matter remains difficult, though they are essential to understanding a large class of strongly correlated phases. Low-energy neutral excitations are especially important in characterizing unconventional phases featuring electron fractionalization, such as quantum spin liquids, spin ices, and insulators with neutral Fermi surfaces. In this perspective, we discuss searches for neutral fermionic, bosonic, or anyonic excitations in unconventional insulators, highlighting theoretical and experimental progress in probing excitonic insulators, new quantum spin liquid candidates and emergent correlated insulators based on two-dimensional layered crystals and moir\'e materials. We outline the promises and challenges in probing and utilizing quantum insulators, and discuss exciting new opportunities for future advancements offered by ideas rooted in next-generation quantum materials, devices, and experimental schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09496 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electron fractionalization and charge-neutral excitations in quantum insulators. a, Cartoon illustration of charge fractionalization in the FQH effects. b, Cartoon illustration of spin-charge separation in QSL arising in e.g., correlated Mott insulators. c, a selection of charge-neutral excitations in electrical insulators with possible model realizations, with selected references listed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantum spin liquids. a, an illustration of geometric frustrations of spins on a triangular lattice. b, the lattice of QSL candidate 1T-TaS2 and 1T-TaSe2, showing clusters of stars of David that form a triangular superlattice. Plot reproduced from ref. 91. c, a scanning tunneling microscope image of 1T-TaSe2, showing the superlattice. Plot reproduced from ref. 91. d, The honeycomb lattice of the Kitaev model. e, the… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The monopole plasma resonance: a smoking gun of 3D $U(1)$ quantum spin liquids

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Charged monopoles in dipolar 3D U(1) quantum spin liquids produce a sharp low-frequency plasma resonance in AC conductivity while remaining DC insulating.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum Physics in On e Dimension

    Giamarchi, T. Quantum Physics in On e Dimension. Oxford University Press

  2. [2]

    A., Nagaosa, N

    Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Dopi ng a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev Mod Phys 78, 17–85 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Theories of non-Fermi liquid behavior in heavy fermions

    Coleman, P. Theories of non-Fermi liquid behavior in heavy fermions. Physica B Condens Matter 259–261, 353–358 (1999)

    1999

  4. [4]

    Stewart, G. R. Non-Fermi-liquid be havior in d- and f- electron metals. Rev Mod Phys 73, 797– 855 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    Cao, Y. et al. Strange Metal in Magic-Angle Graphene with near Planckian Dissipation. Phys Rev Lett 124, 076801 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Jaoui, A. et al. Quantum critical behaviour in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nat Phys 18, 633–638 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Wang, P. et al. One-dimensional Luttinger liquids in a two-dimensional moiré lattice. Nature 605, 57–62 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Yu, G. et al. Evidence for Two Dimensional Anisotropic Luttinger Liquids at Millikelvin Temperatures. Nat Commun 14, 7025 (2023)

    2023

Show all 180 references
  1. [9]

    & Rebbi, C

    Jackiw, R. & Rebbi, C. Solitons with fermion number ½. Physical Review D 13, 3398–3409 (1976)

    1976

  2. [10]

    P., Schrieffer, J

    Su, W. P., Schrieffer, J. R. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in Polyacetylene. Phys Rev Lett 42, 1698– 1701 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    C., Stormer, H

    Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L. & Gossard, A. C. Two-Dimensional Magnetotransport in the Extreme Quantum Limit. Phys Rev Lett 48, 1559–1562 (1982)

    1982

  4. [12]

    Arovas, D., Schrieffer, J. R. & Wilczek, F. Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect. Phys Rev Lett 53, 722–723 (1984)

    1984

  5. [13]

    Anyons and the quantum Hall effect—A pedagogical review

    Stern, A. Anyons and the quantum Hall effect—A pedagogical review. Ann Phys (N Y) 323, 204–249 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    H., Stern, A., Freedman, M

    Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. & Das Sarma, S. Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev Mod Phys 80, 1083–1159 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Anderson, P. W. Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator? Mater Res Bull 8, 153– 160 (1973)

    1973

  8. [16]

    Anderson, P. W. The Resonating Valence B ond State in La 2 CuO 4 and Superconductivity. Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987)

    1987

  9. [17]

    & Sondhi, S

    Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model. Phys Rev Lett 86, 1881–1884 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    & Moore, J

    Moessner, R. & Moore, J. E. Topological Phases of Matter. (Cambridge University Press, 2021). doi:10.1017/9781316226308

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Kitaev, A. Yu. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann Phys (N Y) 303, 2–30 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids

    Wen, X.-G. Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids. Phys Rev B 65, 165113 (2002)

    2002

  13. [21]

    & Chakraborty, B

    Read, N. & Chakraborty, B. Statistics of the excitations of the resonating-valence-bond state. Phys Rev B 40, 7133–7140 (1989)

    1989

  14. [22]

    & Laughlin, R

    Kalmeyer, V. & Laughlin, R. B. Equivalen ce of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states. Phys Rev Lett 59, 2095–2098 (1987)

    1987

  15. [23]

    D., Morampudi, S

    Pace, S. D., Morampudi, S. C., Moessner, R. & Laumann, C. R. Emergent Fine Structure Constant of Quantum Spin Ice Is Large. Phys Rev Lett 127, 117205 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Hermele, M. et al. Stability of U(1) spin liquids in two dimensions. Phys Rev B 70, 214437 (2004)

    2004

  17. [25]

    Stability of the U(1) spin liquid with a spinon Fermi surface in 2+1 dimensions

    Lee, S.-S. Stability of the U(1) spin liquid with a spinon Fermi surface in 2+1 dimensions. Phys Rev B 78, 085129 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    A., Krauth, W., Moessner, R

    Huse, D. A., Krauth, W., Moessner, R. & S ondhi, S. L. Coulomb and Liquid Dimer Models in Three Dimensions. Phys Rev Lett 91, 167004 (2003)

    2003

  19. [27]

    Hermele, M., Fisher, M. P. A. & Balents, L. Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S=1/2 three-dimthree-dimensional frustrated magnet. Phys Rev B 69, 064404 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    & Sondhi , S

    Castelnovo, C., Moessner, R. & Sondhi , S. L. Magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Nature 451, 42–45 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    & Lee, P

    Ng, T.-K. & Lee, P. A. Power-Law Condu ctivity inside the Mott Gap: Application to κ−(BEDT −TTF)2 Cu 2(CN)3. Phys Rev Lett 99, 156402 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Motrunich, O. I. Orbital magnetic field effects in spin liquid with spinon Fermi sea: Possible application to κ−(ET)2 (Cu)2(CN)3. Phys Rev B 73, 155115 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    & Senthil, T

    Sodemann, I., Chowdhury, D. & Senthil, T. Quantum oscillations in insulators with neutral Fermi surfaces. Phys Rev B 97, 045152 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    & Sodemann, I

    Rao, P. & Sodemann, I. Cyclotron resonance inside the Mott gap: A fingerprint of emergent neutral fermions. Phys Rev B 100, 155150 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Y., Pientka, F., L ee, P

    Khoo, J. Y., Pientka, F., L ee, P. A. & Villadiego, I. S. Probing the quantum noise of the spinon Fermi surface with NV centers. Phys Rev B 106, 115108 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond

    Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann Phys (N Y) 321, 2–111 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Laumann, C. R. & Moessner, R. Hybrid dyons , inverted Lorentz force, and magnetic Nernst effect in quantum spin ice. Phys Rev B 108, L220402 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Jérome, D., Rice, T. M. & Kohn, W. Excitonic Insulator. Physical Review 158, 462–475 (1967)

    1967

  29. [37]

    Excitonic Phases

    Kohn, W. Excitonic Phases. Phys Rev Lett 19, 439–442 (1967)

    1967

  30. [38]

    M., Böer, K

    Blatt, J. M., Böer, K. W. & Brandt, W. Bose-Einstein Condensation of Excitons. Physical Review 126, 1691–1692 (1962)

    1962

  31. [39]

    Mott, N. F. The transition to the metallic state. Philosophical Magazine 6, 287–309 (1961)

    1961

  32. [40]

    HALPERIN, B. I. & RICE, T. M. Possib le Anomalies at a Semimetal-Semiconductor Transistion. Rev Mod Phys 40, 755–766 (1968)

    1968

  33. [41]

    H., Devakul, T., Sondhi, S

    Kwan, Y. H., Devakul, T., Sondhi, S. L. & Parameswaran, S. A. Theory of competing excitonic orders in insulating WTe2 monolayers. Phys Rev B 104, 125133 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    & Moore, J

    Wang, Y.-Q., Papaj, M. & Moore, J. E. Breakdown of helical edge state topologically protected conductance in time-reversal-breaking excitonic insulators. Phys Rev B 108, 205420 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Hu, Y., Venderbos, J. W. F. & Kane , C. L. Fractional Excitonic Insulator. Phys Rev Lett 121, 126601 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    & Senthil, T

    Chowdhury, D., Sodemann, I. & Senthil, T. Mixed-valence insulators with neutral Fermi surfaces. Nat Commun 9, 1766 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    & Heinz, T

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Phys 10, 343–350 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Wang, G. et al. Colloquium : Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides. Rev Mod Phys 90, 021001 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Eisenstein, J. P. Exciton Condensation in Bilayer Quantum Hall Systems. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys 5, 159–181 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Liu, X., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Halperin , B. I. & Kim, P. Quantum Hall drag of exciton condensate in graphene. Nat Phys 13, 746–750 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Li, J. I. A., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Hone , J. & Dean, C. R. Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene. Nat Phys 13, 751–755 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Du, L. et al. Evidence for a topological excitonic insulator in InAs/GaSb bilayers. Nat Commun 8, 1971 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Yu, W. et al. Anomalously large resistance at the charge neutrality point in a zero-gap InAs/GaSb bilayer. New J Phys 20, 053062 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Chen, D. et al. Excitonic insulator in a heterojunction moiré superlattice. Nat Phys 18, 1171– 1176 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Correlated interlayer exciton insulator in heterostructures of monolayer WSe2 and moiré WS2/WSe2. Nat Phys 18, 1214–1220 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Ma, L. et al. Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers. Nature 598, 585– 589 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Cercellier, H. et al. Evidence for an Excitonic Insulator Phase in 1T TiSe2. Phys Rev Lett 99, 146403 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Kogar, A. et al. Signatures of exciton condensation in a transition metal dichalcogenide. Science 358, 1314–1317 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Campbell, D. J. et al. Intrinsic insulating ground state in transition metal dichalcogenide TiSe2. Phys Rev Mater 3, 053402 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Li, Z. et al. Possible Excitonic Insulating Phase in Quantum-Confined Sb Nanoflakes. Nano Lett 19, 4960–4964 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Wakisaka, Y. et al. Excitonic Insulator State in Ta2NiSe5 Probed by Photoemission Spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 103, 026402 (2009)

    2009

  52. [60]

    Lu, Y. F. et al. Zero-gap semiconductor to excitonic insulator transition in Ta2NiSe5. Nat Commun 8, 14408 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Fukutani, K. et al. Electrical Tuning of the Excitonic Insulator Ground State of Ta2NiSe5. Phys Rev Lett 123, 206401 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Werdehausen, D. et al. Coherent order parameter oscillations in the ground state of the excitonic insulator Ta2NiSe5. Sci Adv 4, (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Baldini, E. et al. The spontaneous symmetry breaking in Ta2NiSe5 is structural in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Hossain, Md. S. & et al. Discovery of a topolog ical exciton insulator with tunable momentum order. arXiv:2312.15862 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Huang, J. & et al. Evidence for an Ex citonic Insulator State in Ta2Pd3Te5. arXiv:2312.14455 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Jia, Y. et al. Evidence for a monolayer excitonic insulator. Nat Phys 18, 87–93 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Sun, B. et al. Evidence for equilibrium exciton condensation in monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys 18, 94–99 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Lee, P. A. Quantum oscillations in the activa ted conductivity in excitonic insulators: Possible application to monolayer WTe2. Phys Rev B 103, L041101 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Qian, X., Liu, J., Fu, L. & Li, J. Quantum spin Hall effect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Science 346, 1344–1347 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Fei, Z. et al. Edge conduction in monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys 13, 677–682 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Tang, S. et al. Quantum spin Hall state in monolayer 1T’-WTe2. Nat Phys 1–6 (2017) doi:10.1038/nphys4174

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    Wu, S. et al. Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science 359, 76–79 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Fatemi, V. et al. Electrically tunable low-density superconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362, 926–929 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Sajadi, E. et al. Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362, 922–925 (2018)

    2018

  67. [75]

    Wang, P. et al. Landau quantization and highly mobile fermions in an insulator. Nature 589, 225–229 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Tang, Y. et al. Sign-Alternating Thermoelectric Quantum Oscillations in Insulating Monolayer WTe2. arXiv:2405.09665 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Song, T. et al. Unconventional superconducting quantum criticality in monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys 20, 269–274 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02291-1

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    & Lee, P

    He, W.-Y. & Lee, P. A. Electronic density of st ates of a U(1) quantum spin liquid with spinon Fermi surface. I. Orbital magnetic field effects. Phys Rev B 107, 195155 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    & Ng, T.-K

    Zhou, Y., Kanoda, K. & Ng, T.-K. Quantum spin liquid states. Rev Mod Phys 89, 025003 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    Broholm, C. et al. Quantum spin liquids. Science 367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    & Moessner, R

    Knolle, J. & Moessner, R. A Field Guide to Spin Liquids. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys 10, 451–472 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    & Nagler, S

    Takagi, H., Takayama, T., Jackeli, G., Khaliu llin, G. & Nagler, S. E. Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids. Nature Reviews Physics 1, 264–280 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    & Balents, L

    Savary, L. & Balents, L. Quantum spin liquids: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 016502 (2017)

    2017

  76. [84]

    Law, K. T. & Lee, P. A. 1T -TaS2 as a quantum spin liquid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 6996–7000 (2017)

    2017

  77. [85]

    Y., Chen, G., Law, K

    He, W.-Y., Xu, X. Y., Chen, G., Law, K. T. & Lee, P. A. Spinon Fermi Surface in a Cluster Mott Insulator Model on a Triangular Lattice and Possible Application to 1T−TaS2. Phys Rev Lett 121, 046401 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    Sipos, B. et al. From Mott state to superconductivity in 1T-TaS2. Nat Mater 7, 960–965 (2008)

    2008

  79. [87]

    Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2. Nat Nanotechnol 10, 270– 276 (2015)

    2015

  80. [88]

    Wang, Y. D. et al. Band insulator to Mott insulator transition in 1T-TaS2. Nat Commun 11, 4215 (2020)

    2020

  81. [89]

    & Geck, J

    Ritschel, T., Berger, H. & Geck, J. Stacking -driven gap formation in layered 1 T - TaS 2. Phys Rev B 98, 195134 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Wu, Z. et al. Effect of stacking order on the electronic state of 1T-TaS2. Phys Rev B 105, 035109 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Chen, Y. et al. Strong correlations and orbital texture in single-layer 1T-TaSe2. Nat Phys 16, 218–224 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Ruan, W. et al. Evidence for quantum spin liquid behaviour in single-layer 1T-TaSe2 from scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nat Phys 17, 1154–1161 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    Chen, Y. et al. Evidence for a spinon Kondo effect in cobalt atoms on single-layer 1T-TaSe2. Nat Phys 18, 1335–1340 (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    Zhang, Q. et al. Quantum spin liquid signatures in monolayer 1T-NbSe2. Nat Commun 15, 2336 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Liu, L. et al. Direct identification of Mott Hubbard band pattern beyond charge density wave superlattice in monolayer 1T-NbSe2. Nat Commun 12, 1978 (2021)

    2021

  88. [96]

    Liu, M. et al. Monolayer 1T-NbSe2 as a 2D-correlated magnetic insulator. Sci Adv 7, (2021)

    2021

  89. [97]

    Nakata, Y. et al. Monolayer 1T-NbSe2 as a Mott insulator. NPG Asia Mater 8, e321–e321 (2016)

    2016

  90. [98]

    & Khaliullin, G

    Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models. Phys Rev Lett 102, 017205 (2009)

    2009

  91. [99]

    Banerjee, A. et al. Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet. Nat Mater 15, 733–740 (2016)

    2016

  92. [100]

    Plumb, K. W. et al. α-RuCl3 : A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice. Phys Rev B 90, 041112 (2014)

    2014

  93. [101]

    Leahy, I. A. et al. Anomalous Thermal Conductivity and Magnetic Torque Response in the Honeycomb Magnet α-RuCl3. Phys Rev Lett 118, 187203 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    Banerjee, A. et al. Excitations in the field-induced quantum spin liquid state of α-RuCl3. NPJ Quantum Mater 3, 8 (2018)

    2018

  95. [103]

    Hentrich, R. et al. Unusual Phonon Heat Transport in α-RuCl3 : Strong Spin-Phonon Scattering and Field-Induced Spin Gap. Phys Rev Lett 120, 117204 (2018)

    2018

  96. [104]

    McClarty, P. A. et al. Topological magnons in Kitaev magnets at high fields. Phys Rev B 98, 060404 (2018)

    2018

  97. [105]

    Joshi, D. G. Topological excitations in the ferromagnetic Kitaev-Heisenberg model. Phys Rev B 98, 060405 (2018)

    2018

  98. [106]

    S., Catuneanu, A., Sørensen, E

    Gordon, J. S., Catuneanu, A., Sørensen, E. S. & Kee, H.-Y. Theory of the field-revealed Kitaev spin liquid. Nat Commun 10, 2470 (2019)

    2019

  99. [107]

    & Trebst, S

    Hickey, C. & Trebst, S. Emergence of a field-driven U(1) spin liquid in the Kitaev honeycomb model. Nat Commun 10, 530 (2019)

    2019

  100. [108]

    Ponomaryov, A. N. et al. Nature of Magnetic Excitations in the High-Field Phase of α-RuCl3. Phys Rev Lett 125, 037202 (2020)

    2020

  101. [109]

    Wang, Z. et al. Magnetic Excitations and Continuum of a Possibly Field-Induced Quantum Spin Liquid in α-RuCl3. Phys Rev Lett 119, 227202 (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    Czajka, P. et al. Planar thermal Hall effect of topological bosons in the Kitaev magnet α- RuCl3. Nat Mater 22, 36–41 (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    Czajka, P. et al. Oscillations of the thermal conductivity in the spin-liquid state of α-RuCl3. Nat Phys 17, 915–919 (2021)

    2021

  104. [112]

    Kasahara, Y. et al. Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nature 559, 227–231 (2018)

    2018

  105. [113]

    Yokoi, T. et al. Half-integer quantized anomalous thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev material candidate α-RuCl 3. Science 373, 568–572 (2021)

    2021

  106. [114]

    Z., Chern, L

    Zhang, E. Z., Chern, L. E. & Kim, Y. B. Topological magnons for thermal Hall transport in frustrated magnets with bond-dependent interactions. Phys Rev B 103, 174402 (2021)

    2021

  107. [115]

    Bruin, J. A. N. et al. Robustness of the thermal Hall effect close to half-quantization in α- RuCl3. Nat Phys 18, 401–405 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    Villadiego, I. S. Pseudoscalar U(1) spin liquids in α−RuCl3. Phys Rev B 104, 195149 (2021)

    2021

  109. [117]

    Bruin, J. A. N. et al. Origin of oscillatory structures in the magnetothermal conductivity of the putative Kitaev magnet α -RuCl3. APL Mater 10, (2022)

    2022

  110. [118]

    & Kindo, K

    Kubota, Y., Tanaka, H., Ono, T., Narumi , Y. & Kindo, K. Successive magnetic phase transitions in α-RuCl3: XY-like frustrated magnet on the honeycomb lattice. Phys Rev B 91, 094422 (2015)

    2015

  111. [119]

    Cao, H. B. et al. Low-temperature crystal and magnetic structure of α-RuCl3. Phys Rev B 93, 134423 (2016)

    2016

  112. [120]

    Lefrançois, É. et al. Oscillations in the magnetothermal conductivity of α−RuCl3 : Evidence of transition anomalies. Phys Rev B 107, 064408 (2023)

    2023

  113. [121]

    Zhang, H. et al. Sample-dependent and sample-independent thermal transport properties of α-RuCl3. Phys Rev Mater 7, 114403 (2023)

    2023

  114. [122]

    Zhang, H. et al. Stacking disorder and thermal transport properties of α-RuCl3. Phys Rev Mater 8, 014402 (2024)

    2024

  115. [123]

    Zhang, H. & et al. Anisotropy of thermal c onductivity oscillations in relation to the Kitaev spin liquid phase. arXiv:2310.03917 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Hong, X. et al. Phonon thermal transport shaped by strong spin-phonon scattering in a Kitaev material Na2Co2TeO6. NPJ Quantum Mater 9, 18 (2024)

    2024

  117. [125]

    Hong, X. et al. Spinon Heat Transport in the Three-Dimensional Quantum Magnet PbCuTe2O6. Phys Rev Lett 131, 256701 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Yamashita, M. et al. Presence and absence of itinerant gapless excitations in the quantum spin liquid candidate EtMe2Sb[Pd(dmit)2]2. Phys Rev B 101, 140407 (2020)

    2020

  119. [127]

    Ni, J. M. et al. Absence of Magnetic Thermal Conductivity in the Quantum Spin Liquid Candidate EtNe3Sb[Pd(dmit)2]2. Phys Rev Lett 123, 247204 (2019)

    2019

  120. [128]

    Bourgeois-Hope, P. et al. Thermal Conductivity of the Quantum Spin Liquid Candidate EtMe3Sb[Pd(dnit)2]2: No Evidence of Mobile Gapless Excitations. Phys Rev X 9, 041051 (2019)

    2019

  121. [129]

    Ioffe, L. B. & Larkin, A. I. Gapless fermions and gauge fields in dielectrics. Phys Rev B 39, 8988–8999 (1989)

    1989

  122. [130]

    Lee, P. A. & Nagaosa, N. Gauge theory of the normal state of high-Tc superconductors. Phys Rev B 46, 5621–5639 (1992)

    1992

  123. [131]

    & Lee, P

    He, W.-Y. & Lee, P. A. Electronic density of states of a U1 quantum spin liquid with spinon Fermi surface. I. Orbital magnetic field effects. Phys Rev B 107, 195155 (2023)

    2023

  124. [132]

    Tan, B. S. et al. Unconventional Fermi surface in an insulating state. Science 349, 287–290 (2015)

    2015

  125. [133]

    Li, G. et al. Two-dimensional Fermi surfaces in Kondo insulator SmB6. Science 346, 1208– 1212 (2014)

    2014

  126. [134]

    Xiang, Z. et al. Quantum oscillations of electrical resistivity in an insulator. Science 362, 65–69 (2018)

    2018

  127. [135]

    & Du, R.-R

    Han, Z., Li, T., Zhang, L., Sullivan, G. & Du, R.-R. Anomalous Conductance Oscillations in the Hybridization Gap of InAs/GaSb Quantum Wells. Phys Rev Lett 123, 126803 (2019)

    2019

  128. [136]

    & Hu, L.-H

    Xiao, D., Liu, C.-X., Samarth, N. & Hu, L.-H. Anomalous Quantum Oscillations of Interacting Electron-Hole Gases in Inverted Type-II InAs/GaSb Quantum Wells. Phys Rev Lett 122, 186802 (2019)

    2019

  129. [137]

    Zheng, G. & et al. Unconventional Magnetic Oscillations in Kagome Mott Insulators. arXiv:2310.07989 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  130. [138]

    & Allen, J

    Li, L., Sun, K., Kurdak, C. & Allen, J. W. Emergent mystery in the Kondo insulator samarium hexaboride. Nature Reviews Physics 2, 463–479 (2020)

    2020

  131. [139]

    Shen, H. & Fu, L. Quantum Oscillation from In-Gap States and a Non-Hermitian Landau Level Problem. Phys Rev Lett 121, 026403 (2018)

    2018

  132. [140]

    & Wang, F

    Zhang, L., Song, X.-Y. & Wang, F. Qu antum Oscillation in Narrow-Gap Topological Insulators. Phys Rev Lett 116, 046404 (2016)

    2016

  133. [141]

    & Kumar, B

    Ram, P. & Kumar, B. Theory of quantum oscillations of magnetization in Kondo insulators. Phys Rev B 96, 075115 (2017)

    2017

  134. [142]

    & Cooper, N

    Knolle, J. & Cooper, N. R. Quantum Os cillations without a Fermi Surface and the Anomalous de Haas–van Alphen Effect. Phys Rev Lett 115, 146401 (2015)

    2015

  135. [143]

    & Cooper, N

    Knolle, J. & Cooper, N. R. Anomalous de Haas–van Alphen Effect in InAs/GaSb Quantum Wells. Phys Rev Lett 118, 176801 (2017)

    2017

  136. [144]

    & Tsvelik, A

    Erten, O., Chang, P.-Y., Colem an, P. & Tsvelik, A. M. Skyrme Insulators: Insulators at the Brink of Superconductivity. Phys Rev Lett 119, 057603 (2017)

    2017

  137. [145]

    & Lee, P

    He, W.-Y. & Lee, P. A. Quantum oscillat ion of thermally activated conductivity in a monolayer WTe2-like excitonic insulator. Phys Rev B 104, L041110 (2021)

    2021

  138. [146]

    F., Shan, J

    Zhu, J., Li, T., Young, A. F., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Quantum oscillations in 2D insulators induced by graphite gates. PRL 127, 247702 (2021)

    2021

  139. [147]

    Cooper, N. R. & Kelsall, J. Quantum oscillations in an impurity-band Anderson insulator. SciPost Physics 15, 118 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    Pirie, H. et al. Visualizing the atomic-scale origin of metallic behavior in Kondo insulators. Science 379, 1214–1218 (2023)

    2023

  141. [149]

    K., Piéchon, F., Fu chs, J.-N., Goerbig, M

    Pal, H. K., Piéchon, F., Fu chs, J.-N., Goerbig, M. & Montambaux, G. Chemical potential asymmetry and quantum oscillations in insulators. Phys Rev B 94, 125140 (2016)

    2016

  142. [150]

    hole-like

    In the previous section, we summarized the status of oscillations observed in α-RuCl3. A conclusive demonstration of a neutral Fermi surface inside a charge gap remains an outstanding goal. It is essential to establish a concrete case where intrinsic Landau quantization in ins...

  143. [151]

    The detection of unconventional quantum oscillations in insulating 2D materials

    Wu, S. The detection of unconventional quantum oscillations in insulating 2D materials. 2d Mater 11, 033004 (2024)

    2024

  144. [152]

    & Pal, H

    Singh, G. & Pal, H. K. Effect of many-bod y interaction on de Haas–van Alphen oscillations in insulators. Phys Rev B 108, L201103 (2023)

    2023

  145. [153]

    M., Chang, W

    Zuev, Y. M., Chang, W. & Kim, P. Ther moelectric and Magnetothermoelectric Transport Measurements of Graphene. Phys Rev Lett 102, 96807 (2009)

    2009

  146. [154]

    Checkelsky, J. G. & Ong, N. P. Thermopo wer and Nernst effect in graphene in a magnetic field. Phys Rev B 80, 81413 (2009)

    2009

  147. [155]

    Zhong, R., Gao, T., Ong, N. P. & Cava, R. J. Weak-field induced nonmagnetic state in a Co- based honeycomb. Sci Adv 6, (2020)

    2020

  148. [156]

    Ni, D., Gui, X., Powderly , K. M. & Cava, R. J. Honeycomb-Structure RuI3 , A New Quantum Material Related to α-RuCl 3. Advanced Materials 34, (2022)

    2022

  149. [157]

    Halloran, T. et al. Geometrical frustration versus Kitaev interactions in BaCo2(AsO 4) 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, (2023)

    2023

  150. [158]

    Zhang, X. et al. A magnetic continuum in the cobalt-based honeycomb magnet BaCo2(AsO4)2. Nat Mater 22, 58–63 (2023)

    2023

  151. [159]

    C., Senthil, T

    Potter, A. C., Senthil, T. & Lee, P. A. Mechanisms for sub-gap optical conductivity in Herbertsmithite. Phys Rev B 87, 245106 (2013)

    2013

  152. [160]

    Onyszczak, M. et al. A platform for far-infrared spectroscopy of quantum materials at millikelvin temperatures. Review of Scientific Instruments 94, 103903 (2023)

    2023

  153. [161]

    & Nandkishore, R

    Hart, O. & Nandkishore, R. Extracting sp inon self-energies from two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 107, 205143 (2023)

    2023

  154. [162]

    A proposal is to utilize NV-center spin qubits for detecting quantum noises of spinon Fermi surfaces33,163–165

    Another exciting direction to explore is to employ recent advances in quantum sensing for probing quantum matter. A proposal is to utilize NV-center spin qubits for detecting quantum noises of spinon Fermi surfaces33,163–165. Charge-Neutral Quantum Devices – The investigations...

  155. [163]

    & Armitage, N

    Wan, Y. & Armitage, N. P. Resolving Continua of Fractional Excitations by Spinon Echo in THz 2D Coherent Spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 122, 257401 (2019)

    2019

  156. [164]

    & Wan, Y

    Gao, Q., Liu, Y., Liao, H. & Wan, Y. Tw o-dimensional coherent spectrum of interacting spinons from matrix product states. Phys Rev B 107, 165121 (2023)

    2023

  157. [165]

    Chatterjee, S., Rodriguez-Nieva, J. F. & De mler, E. Diagnosing phases of magnetic insulators via noise magnetometry with spin qubits. Phys Rev B 99, 104425 (2019)

    2019

  158. [166]

    Y., Pientka, F

    Khoo, J. Y., Pientka, F. & Sodemann, I. Th e universal shear conductivity of Fermi liquids and spinon Fermi surface states and its detection via spin qubit noise magnetometry. New J Phys 23, 113009 (2021)

    2021

  159. [167]

    Lee, P. A. & Morampudi, S. Proposal to detec t emergent gauge field and its Meissner effect in spin liquids using NV centers. Phys Rev B 107, 195102 (2023)

    2023

  160. [168]

    & Xie, X.-C

    Han, W., Maekawa, S. & Xie, X.-C. Sp in current as a probe of quantum materials. Nat Mater 19, 139–152 (2020)

    2020

  161. [169]

    Park, H. et al. Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect. Nature 622, 74–79 (2023)

    2023

  162. [170]

    Xu, F. et al. Observation of Integer and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2. Phys Rev X 13, 031037 (2023)

    2023

  163. [171]

    Lu, Z. et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  164. [172]

    Anderson, E. et al. Programming correlated magnetic states with gate-controlled moiré geometry. Science 381, 325–330 (2023)

    2023

  165. [173]

    Cai, J. et al. Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2. Nature 622, 63–68 (2023)

    2023

  166. [174]

    Zeng, Y. et al. Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe2. Nature 622, 69–73 (2023)

    2023

  167. [175]

    & Mudr y, C

    Neupert, T., Santos, L., Chamon, C. & Mudr y, C. Fractional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field. Phys Rev Lett 106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  168. [176]

    N., Gu, Z.-C., Sun, K

    Sheng, D. N., Gu, Z.-C., Sun, K. & Sheng, L. Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels. Nat Commun 2, 389 (2011)

    2011

  169. [177]

    & Bernevig, B

    Regnault, N. & Bernevig, B. A. Fractional Chern Insulator. Phys Rev X 1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  170. [178]

    & Wen, X.-G

    Tang, E., Mei, J.-W. & Wen, X.-G. High -Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States. Phys Rev Lett 106, 236802 (2011)

    2011

  171. [179]

    & Das Sarma, S

    Sun, K., Gu, Z., Katsura, H. & Das Sarma, S. Nearly Flatbands with Nontrivial Topology. Phys Rev Lett 106, 236803 (2011)

    2011

  172. [180]

    Baird, D. H. R. I. G. ; N. A. Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Springer- Verlag. ISBN 0-7923-4653-X (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.