Differential Representation for Carrollian Correlators

Arpit Maurya; Shankhadeep Chakrabortty; Subramanya Hegde

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Differential Representation for Carrollian Correlators

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scalar Carrollian correlators admit a differential representation: exchange diagrams are rational differential operators on contact diagrams, and under the modified Mellin kernel those operators become flat-space momenta.

desk verdict A solid and genuinely useful construction of the Carrollian differential representation, but the worked example silently assumes massless internal lines and should be flagged. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09641 v2 pith:ZNZX5725 submitted 2024-11-14 hep-th

Shankhadeep Chakrabortty , Subramanya Hegde , Arpit Maurya This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords CarrollianholographydifferentialrepresentationWittendiagramsmodifiedMellintransformflat-spacescatteringamplitudesBCJrelationsconformalprimarywavefunctioncelestial

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that scalar Carrollian correlators — the boundary correlators of flat-space holography — carry the same differential representation that AdS/CFT correlators do. Concretely, an exchange-channel Carrollian correlator $A_n(\{p_i\})$ is claimed to be $\hat A_n(\{D_{p_i,\mu}\})C_n(\{p_i\})$, where $C_n$ is the contact correlator, $\hat A_n$ is a rational function of differential operators, and $D_{p_i,\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\tilde q_i^\nu\,\partial_{u_i}$ is a commuting translation generator labelled by a null boundary direction $\tilde q_i$. Because these operators become flat-space momenta when acting on the modified Mellin kernel, the same statement says the Carrollian correlator is the modified Mellin transform of the flat-space scattering amplitude. A sympathetic reader would care because this converts exchange-diagram computations into simple integrations and imports amplitude identities, such as BCJ relations, directly into Carrollian holography.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the commuting set of boundary translation generators $D_{p_i,\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\tilde q_i^\nu\,\partial_{u_i}$, with $\tilde q_i$ the null direction assigned to external particle $i$ on the Carrollian boundary and $u_i$ the retarded time. Each generator squares to zero because $\tilde q_i^2=0$, and all generators commute because $\tilde q_i$ is independent of $u_i$; they are the leading pieces produced by the Carrollian limit of the AdS boundary conformal generators. The mechanism is the identity $(\partial_{x^\mu}-\sum_i\eta_{\mu\nu}\tilde q_i^\nu\partial_{u_i})\prod_iK_{\Delta_i}=0$, which lets the flat-space Laplacian on the product of bulk-to-boundary propagators be replaced by $(\sum_iD_{p_i})^2$; the exchange channel is then the inverse of this operator acting on the contact correlator. The modified Mellin kernel $e^{\pm i\omega_i u_i}$ diagonalizes each operator with eigenvalue $ip_{i,\mu}$, which is the step that connects the differential representation to flat-space scattering amplitudes.

What would settle it

Compute the next correction in $1/L$ to the Carrollian-limit identity $(\partial_{x^\mu}-\sum_i\eta_{\mu\nu}\tilde q_i^\nu\partial_{u_i})\prod_iK_{\Delta_i}=0$ with $\Delta_i\sim m_iL$ kept explicit: the differential representation is falsified if the $O(1/L^2)$ corrections to the Laplacian or to the propagators, combined with $\Delta_i$, contribute at $O(1)$ or larger. A concrete check is to expand the $s$-channel exchange correlator of section 5.1.1 to order $1/L^2$ and compare it with $\hat A_4C_4$ evaluated at the same order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the flat-space limit of the AdS differential representation survives in the Carrollian boundary theory, with all non-commuting generators dropping out. Performing the Inönü-Wigner contraction — the group-theoretic limit in which the AdS radius goes to infinity and the isometry algebra becomes the Poincaré algebra — of the bulk isometry and boundary conformal generators with $\tau_p=\pi/2+u/L$, the leading $O(L)$ pieces are boundary translations, and the propagator identity $(D^X_{AB}+\sum_i D^{p_i}_{AB})\prod_iK_{\Delta_i}=0$ becomes $(\partial_{x^\mu}-\sum_i\eta_{\mu\nu}\tilde q_i^\nu\partial_{u_i})\prod_iK_{\Delta_i}=0$. Since $D^2_{p_i}=0$ and $[D_{p_i,\mu},D_{p_j,\nu}]=0$, the flat-space Laplacian acting on the product of propagators is replaced by $(\sum_iD_{p_i})^2$, and an exchange Witten diagram becomes a rational differential operator acting on the contact diagram, $A_n=\hat A_n(\{D_{p_i,\mu}\})C_n$. Acting on the modified Mellin kernel $e^{i\omega_i u_i}$, each $D_{p_i,\mu}$ returns $ip_{i,\mu}$ with $p_{i,\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\omega_i\tilde q_i^\nu$, so the differential representation directly reproduces the known statement that Carrollian correlators are modified Mellin transforms of flat-space amplitudes. The same identities are rederived intrinsically from translation covariance of the Carrollian conformal primary wavefunction, so the representation does not depend on the finite-radius construction.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the terms dropped when the AdS radius $L$ goes to infinity stay negligible even though the operator dimensions $\Delta_i$ in the propagators grow linearly with $L$; if those growing dimensions amplify the $O(1/L^2)$ pieces, the clean differential picture would acquire corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The exchange channel of a scalar Carrollian correlator can be obtained from the contact diagram by solving a second-order partial differential equation; for four-point $\phi^3$ theory the equation integrates directly and reproduces the previously known modified-Mellin result.
Flat-space amplitude identities translate into differential equations: any Mandelstam variable $s_{ij}$ is replaced by $2\tilde q_i\cdot\tilde q_j\,\partial_{u_i}\partial_{u_j}$, so color-kinematics duality becomes differential BCJ relations for Carrollian correlators.
The differential representation makes the equivalence of the two standard Carrollian prescriptions — flat limit of AdS Witten diagrams on one side, modified Mellin transform of amplitudes on the other — a theorem at leading order rather than a separate assumption.
Because the operators commute and diagonalize on the same kernel, the formalism is not tied to $\phi^3$ theory; it transfers to any theory whose flat-space amplitudes obey the same algebraic relations.
A parallel prescription $D_{p_i,\mu}\to i\tilde q_{i,\mu}e^{\partial_{\Delta_i}}$ carries the differential representation to celestial correlators and connects to known celestial BCJ relations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: if the leading-order statement survives finite-radius corrections, Carrollian correlators are essentially flat-space amplitudes in a different basis, so standard amplitude technology — unitarity, double copy, loop integrands — should transfer to Carrollian correlators without re-deriving Feynman rules.
Editorial inference: because all operators in a propagator sum commute, higher-point exchange correlators can be computed by a simultaneous Fourier transform of the differential equations rather than by nested modified Mellin integrals; this is a natural next test of the method.
Editorial inference: the celestial replacement $D_{p_i,\mu}\to i\tilde q_{i,\mu}e^{\partial_{\Delta_i}}$ can be checked directly against known celestial MHV or two-point amplitudes; if it holds, differential BCJ relations in celestial holography follow from the same argument.
Editorial inference: the subleading $1/L^2$ corrections with $\Delta_i\sim m_iL$ are the sharpest stress test; no current computation in the paper resolves whether those corrections stay subdominant.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this is the first differential representation for scalar Carrollian correlators, and it's built two different ways—by taking the Carrollian limit of the AdS differential representation and then independently from the translation properties of Carrollian primary wave functions. The two routes agree, the explicit 4-point exchange example matches the known result from Bagchi-Dhivakar-Dutta, and the intrinsic derivation in section 4.4 is clean enough to stand on its own. That is a real advance for the Carrollian holography subfield, not just a routine dictionary entry.

The flat-limit derivation does drop subleading terms in the large-L expansion—O(1/L^2) corrections to the Laplacian, the conformal Jacobian factors, and possible enhancement from the Δ_i ~ L scalings—without a systematic error estimate. That is a soft spot, but the intrinsic argument does not rely on those suppressed terms, so the leading-order statement is on solid ground. The integration-constant ambiguity in section 5.1 is handled by a generic-kinematics assumption; plausible, though not fully justified.

The one real issue is the internal line mass. The AdS denominator is D^2 - Δ(Δ-d), and since Δ/L = m, the flat limit at leading order gives D^2 - m^2, not D^2. The paper defines m in section 2.2 but then writes eq. (5.1) and the worked example with no mass term, without ever saying the internal line is massless. The general formula (4.17) and the Mellin identification (4.25) are not wrong—the differential operator can contain m^2—but the concrete example is either incomplete or silently restricted to m=0. A referee should ask for the massless assumption to be stated, and ideally for the massive version to be shown.

The differential BCJ relations are a straightforward application of the modified Mellin kernel and work fine. The citation pattern is honest; the paper builds on Bagchi-Dhivakar-Dutta, Alday et al., and Banerjee, and does not overclaim novelty.

Bottom line: send it to peer review. The central construction is correct, the presentation is mostly clear, and the massless gap is easily patched. After minor revision this becomes a solid contribution to Carrollian holography.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a differential representation for scalar Carrollian correlators, first by taking the Carrollian (flat-space) limit of the AdS differential representation, and then intrinsically from the translation property of Carrollian conformal primary wavefunctions. The central result is that a Carrollian exchange correlator is obtained by acting on the corresponding contact correlator with a differential operator ȷA_n constructed from commuting translation generators D_{p_i,μ}; under the modified Mellin kernel these operators become momenta, identifying Carrollian correlators with modified Mellin transforms of flat-space scattering amplitudes. The paper applies this to compute a 4-point exchange diagram in scalar ϕ3 theory and to derive differential BCJ relations for Carrollian correlators.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper provides a simple and powerful computational tool for Carrollian correlators: exchange diagrams reduce to differential equations acting on contact diagrams, with the differential operators commuting. The intrinsic derivation in Sec. 4.4 is elegant, and the agreement of the worked example with Ref. [30] is a strong check. The paper also sharpens the connection between Carrollian holography and scattering amplitudes under the modified Mellin transform, and the differential BCJ relations are a natural extension. The derivations are analytic and transparent, and the paper is clearly written. However, the central claims need to be sharpened by an explicit statement about the mass of internal lines; as written, the general formulas in Eqs. (4.17) and (4.25) and the example in Sec. 5.1 are incomplete for massive exchanges.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.25); Sec. 5.1, Eq. (5.1)] The paper does not state that the differential representation is restricted to massless internal propagators, and this omission affects the central claim. In the flat-space limit of the AdS exchange denominator in Eq. (3.11), the term Δ(Δ−d) is leading order when Δ ∼ L and m = Δ/L is held fixed, so the denominator becomes proportional to D_flat^2 − m^2. The paper nevertheless writes the s-channel operator in Eq. (5.1) as 2~ q_1·~ q_2 ∂_{u1}∂_{u2}, i.e., D_{12}^2, and the example corresponds to an amplitude 1/s. For a massive internal line the equation should read [2~ q_1·~ q_2 ∂_{u1}∂_{u2} − m^2] A_4 = C_4, and the Mellin-space amplitude should be 1/(s−m^2). The paper should either explicitly restrict the general claims in the abstract, Eq. (4.17), and Eq. (4.25) to massless internal lines, or include the mass term throughout. The worked example in Sec. 5.1.1 is thus only valid under a restriction that must be stated.
[Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.10)–(4.16)] The flat-space-limit derivation in Sec. 4.2 does not fully justify the truncation at leading order in 1/L once the propagator dimensions are large. The identities in Eq. (3.17) contain scale factors ξ_{AB} multiplied by Σ_i Δ_i, which is O(L) because Δ_i ∼ L. Consequently, the subleading boost generators in the flat limit, although formally O(1) as operators, can produce O(L) contributions when acting on the product of Carrollian bulk-to-boundary propagators; the paper does not prove that these are suppressed relative to the O(L^2) contribution of the translation generators. The assertion that the non-commuting differential operators are subleading is therefore not established by the operator scaling alone. Since the intrinsic identity (4.27) is exact, this concern does not invalidate the final result, but the flat-space-limit derivation should either be upgraded to a controlled expansion or explicitly labelled as a heuristic leading-order argument.

minor comments (6)

[Sec. 2.2] The phrase 'Similiar analysis' contains a typo; it should be 'Similar analysis'.
[Sec. 4.4] The word 'celesetial' is misspelled; it should be 'celestial'.
[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.13)] The symbol '4X' preceding the sum is a typesetting artifact; it should be a summation sign.
[Sec. 5.1] The text says the contact correlator is in ϕ4 theory while the exchange is in ϕ3 theory; a sentence clarifying that only the contact integral is used would avoid confusion.
[Sec. 5.1.1] The transition from Eq. (5.4) to Eq. (5.8) uses Eq. (5.9) and integration, but the intermediate steps are not shown; a short derivation would improve verifiability.
[Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.22)] The signs in the exponents and the iε prescription for incoming versus outgoing wavefunctions are not explained; please clarify how the ∓ signs are assigned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Carrollian differential representation is derived from bulk-to-boundary identities and cross-checked against an external computation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. The differential representation (4.17) is obtained in two independent ways: as the large-AdS-radius limit of the AdS bulk-to-boundary identity (3.6)/(3.17) in sections 3 and 4.2, and intrinsically from the translation covariance (4.26) of the Carrollian conformal primary wave function in section 4.4. The limiting identities (4.10), (4.14), and (4.16) are explicitly tied to the Carrollian propagator (2.25) and can be verified directly from that expression; they are not assumed from the desired conclusion. The Mellin-transform statement (4.25) follows from (4.17) together with the contact result (4.23), which is benchmarked to the flat-space momentum-conserving delta function. The exchange example (5.8) is checked against the independently computed modified-Mellin exchange diagram of [30]. The differential BCJ relations in section 5.2 are explicitly derived from flat-space BCJ via the Mellin kernel, rather than being used to define the correlators. No load-bearing self-citation occurs: the cited Carrollian-limit framework [29,30] and conformal-primary wave functions [10] are external to the present authors. A possible technical concern is that the paper does not explicitly state a massless-internal-line restriction when passing from 1/(D12^2 - Delta(Delta-d)) to 1/D12^2 in the exchange channels; this is a completeness or correctness issue, not a circularity, because it does not reduce the conclusion to an input assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters; the AdS radius L, conformal dimensions Delta_i, and mass m are physical inputs, not constants chosen to match data. The central claim rests on several established results that the paper imports without proof, listed as axioms: the AdS differential representation of [34,37], the Carrollian flat limit of AdS Witten diagrams from [29,30], the transformation properties of Carrollian conformal primary wave functions from [10], and flat-space BCJ duality. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The differential representation of AdS correlators: exchange Witten diagrams can be written as rational functions of boundary conformal generators acting on contact diagrams (eqs. (3.6)-(3.11)).
The paper reviews this as known from [34,37] and uses it as the starting point for the Carrollian limit in sections 3-4.
domain assumption The Carrollian limit of AdS Witten diagrams as formulated in [29] yields the Carrollian bulk-to-boundary propagator (2.25) and identifies boundary retarded time u = L(tau_p - pi/2), with conformal dimensions Delta_i ~ O(L) and m = Delta/L fixed.
Used in section 2.2 and section 4 to define the Carrollian correlators and to take the flat limit.
domain assumption The Carrollian conformal primary wave function K_Delta(x,p) satisfies the translation transformation (4.26), which implies the identity (4.27).
Taken from [10] and used for the intrinsic derivation in section 4.4.
domain assumption Flat-space scattering amplitudes in theories with color-kinematics duality satisfy the BCJ relations (5.12).
Used in section 5.2 to derive differential BCJ relations for Carrollian correlators.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differential Representation for Carrollian Correlators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNZX5725

@misc{pith2026241109641,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differential Representation for Carrollian Correlators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNZX5725}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09641}
}

read the original abstract

The differential representation of AdS correlators offers a framework to express exchange Witten diagrams as functions of non-local differential operators applied to contact Witten diagrams. In this paper, we develop the differential representation for scalar Carrollian correlators. We first construct this representation using the recently formulated Carrollian limit of AdS Witten diagrams. We then provide an alternate intrinsic analysis that leverages the properties of the Carrollian bulk-to-boundary propagator. Using the differential representation, we also obtain differential Bern-Carrasco-Johansson (BCJ) relations for Carrollian correlators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Missing Descendants in the Carrollian Conformal Family
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Including the missing K0 descendant chain completes Carrollian conformal representations and produces C2>0 sectors and two-point correlators fixed only up to functions of Carrollian invariants.
Constraining bulk-to-boundary correlators under Poincar\'e symmetry
hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Poincaré symmetry plus null-infinity fall-off conditions force scalar bulk-to-boundary correlators to 1/(u+n·x)^Δ and fermionic ones to a sum of 1/(u+n·x)^Δ and /n/(u+n·x)^(Δ+1) branches.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[30]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll, JHEP 08 (2024) 144 [2311.11246]

arXiv 2024
[1]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1998
[2]

Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv

E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

arXiv 1998
[3]

Ammon and J

M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9780511846373

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846373 2015
[4]

Barnich, A

G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H. A. Gonzalez,The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 024020 [1204.3288]

arXiv 2012
[5]

Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys

A. Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

arXiv 2010
[6]

Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]. – 24 –

arXiv 2001
[7]

Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP 07 (2014) 151 [1308.0589]

A. Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP 07 (2014) 151 [1308.0589]

arXiv 2014

Show all 57 references

[8]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

2017 arXiv
[9]

Bagchi, R

A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar and A. Mehra,Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory, JHEP 12 (2016) 147 [1609.06203]

2016 arXiv
[10]

Banerjee,Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group, JHEP 01 (2019) 205 [1801.10171]

S. Banerjee,Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group, JHEP 01 (2019) 205 [1801.10171]

2019 arXiv
[11]

Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur

S. Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 1062 [2108.04801]

2021 arXiv
[12]

Gupta, P

N. Gupta, P. Paul and N. V. Suryanarayana,sl2^ symmetry of R1,3 gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 086029 [2109.06857]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, 2107.02075

A.-M. Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, 2107.02075

arXiv
[14]

Pasterski, M

S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, inSnowmass 2021, 11, 2021, 2111.11392

2021 arXiv
[15]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 071602 [2202.04702]

2022 arXiv
[16]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 126027 [2212.12553]

2023 arXiv
[17]

Banerjee, R

S. Banerjee, R. Mandal, S. Misra, S. Panda and P. Paul,All OPEs invariant under the infinite symmetry algebra for gluons on the celestial sphere, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 026020 [2311.16796]

2024 arXiv
[18]

Costello, N

K. Costello, N. M. Paquette and A. Sharma,Top-Down Holography in an Asymptotically Flat Spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 061602 [2208.14233]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Laddha, S

A. Laddha, S. G. Prabhu, S. Raju and P. Shrivastava,The Holographic Nature of Null Infinity, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 041 [2002.02448]

2021 arXiv
[20]

D. Jain, S. Kundu, S. Minwalla, O. Parrikar, S. G. Prabhu and P. Shrivastava,The S-matrix and boundary correlators in flat space, 2311.03443

arXiv
[21]

W.-B. Liu, J. Long and X.-Q. Ye,Feynman rules and loop structure of Carrollian amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2024) 213 [2402.04120]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory. 3, 2017, [1703.05448]

2017 arXiv
[23]

Susskind,Holography in the flat space limit, AIP Conf

L. Susskind,Holography in the flat space limit, AIP Conf. Proc.493 (1999) 98 [hep-th/9901079]

1999 arXiv
[24]

Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time, hep-th/9901076

J. Polchinski,S matrices from AdS space-time, hep-th/9901076

arXiv
[25]

S. B. Giddings,The Boundary S matrix and the AdS to CFT dictionary, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 2707 [hep-th/9903048]

1999 arXiv
[26]

M. Gary, S. B. Giddings and J. Penedones,Local bulk S-matrix elements and CFT singularities, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 085005 [0903.4437]

2009 arXiv
[27]

Penedones,Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]

J. Penedones,Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]. – 25 –

2011 arXiv
[28]

L. P. de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu,Eikonal approximation in celestial CFT, JHEP 03 (2023) 030 [2206.10547]

2023 arXiv
[29]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators, JHEP 04 (2023) 135 [2303.07388]

2023 arXiv
[31]

L. F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian Amplitudes from Holographic Correlators, 2406.19343

arXiv
[32]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,3D Stress Tensor for Gravity in 4D Flat Spacetime, 2408.05494

arXiv
[33]

Bagchi, S

A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 241601 [2202.08438]

2022 arXiv
[34]

Eberhardt, S

L. Eberhardt, S. Komatsu and S. Mizera,Scattering equations in AdS: scalar correlators in arbitrary dimensions, JHEP 11 (2020) 158 [2007.06574]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Roehrig and D

K. Roehrig and D. Skinner,Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations on AdS3×S3, JHEP 02 (2022) 073 [2007.07234]

2022 arXiv
[36]

Armstrong, A

C. Armstrong, A. E. Lipstein and J. Mei,Color/kinematics duality in AdS4, JHEP 02 (2021) 194 [2012.02059]

2021 arXiv
[37]

Diwakar, A

P. Diwakar, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,BCJ amplitude relations for Anti-de Sitter boundary correlators in embedding space, JHEP 10 (2021) 141 [2106.10822]

2021 arXiv
[38]

Herderschee,A new framework for higher loop Witten diagrams, JHEP 06 (2024) 008 [2112.08226]

A. Herderschee,A new framework for higher loop Witten diagrams, JHEP 06 (2024) 008 [2112.08226]

2024 arXiv
[39]

Herderschee, R

A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,On the differential representation and color-kinematics duality of AdS boundary correlators, JHEP 05 (2022) 026 [2201.05067]

2022 arXiv
[40]

Cheung, J

C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez and A. Sivaramakrishnan,On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes, JHEP 05 (2022) 027 [2201.05147]

2022 arXiv
[41]

Armstrong, H

C. Armstrong, H. Gomez, R. Lipinski Jusinskas, A. Lipstein and J. Mei,New recursion relations for tree-level correlators in anti–de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) L121701 [2209.02709]

2022 arXiv
[42]

Li,Flat-space structure of gluons and gravitons in AdS spacetime, Phys

Y.-Z. Li,Flat-space structure of gluons and gravitons in AdS spacetime, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 125018 [2212.13195]

2023 arXiv
[43]

Li and J

Y.-Z. Li and J. Mei,Bootstrapping Witten diagrams via differential representation in Mellin space, JHEP 07 (2023) 156 [2304.12757]

2023 arXiv
[44]

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco and H. Johansson,New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 085011 [0805.3993]

2008 arXiv
[45]

Penedones,TASI lectures on AdS/CFT, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp

J. Penedones,TASI lectures on AdS/CFT, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 75–136, 2017, 1608.04948, DOI

2017 arXiv
[46]

S. B. Giddings,Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 106008 [hep-th/9907129]. – 26 –

2000 arXiv
[47]

Gonçalves, J

V. Gonçalves, J. a. Penedones and E. Trevisani,Factorization of Mellin amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2015) 040 [1410.4185]

2015 arXiv
[48]

Gomez, R

H. Gomez, R. Lipinski Jusinskas and A. Lipstein,Cosmological scattering equations, Physical Review Letters 127 (2021)

2021
[49]

Stieberger and T

S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor,Symmetries of Celestial Amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B793 (2019) 141 [1812.01080]

2019 arXiv
[50]

Y. Hu, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant and A. Volovich,Celestial dual superconformal symmetry, MHV amplitudes and differential equations, JHEP 12 (2021) 171 [2106.16111]

2021 arXiv
[51]

Ruzziconi, S

R. Ruzziconi, S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu,Differential equations for Carrollian amplitudes, JHEP 09 (2024) 149 [2407.04789]

2024 arXiv
[52]

Casali and A

E. Casali and A. Puhm,Double copy for celestial amplitudes, Physical Review Letters126 (2021)

2021
[53]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 085006 [1706.03917]

2017 arXiv
[54]

Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,The duality between color and kinematics and its applications, J. Phys. A57 (2024) 333002 [1909.01358]

2024 arXiv
[55]

M. S. Costa, V. Gonçalves and J. a. Penedones,Spinning AdS Propagators, JHEP 09 (2014) 064 [1404.5625]

2014 arXiv
[56]

Bekaert, J

X. Bekaert, J. Erdmenger, D. Ponomarev and C. Sleight,Towards holographic higher-spin interactions: Four-point functions and higher-spin exchange, JHEP 03 (2015) 170 [1412.0016]

2015 arXiv
[57]

Chang, R

C.-M. Chang, R. Liu and W.-J. Ma,Split representation in celestial holography, 2311.08736. – 27 –

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [30]

Bagchi, P

A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta,Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll, JHEP 08 (2024) 144 [2311.11246]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1998

[3] [2]

Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv

E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

arXiv 1998

[4] [3]

Ammon and J

M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9780511846373

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846373 2015

[5] [4]

Barnich, A

G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H. A. Gonzalez,The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 024020 [1204.3288]

arXiv 2012

[6] [5]

Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys

A. Bagchi,Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

arXiv 2010

[7] [6]

Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]. – 24 –

arXiv 2001

[8] [7]

Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP 07 (2014) 151 [1308.0589]

A. Strominger,Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory, JHEP 07 (2014) 151 [1308.0589]

arXiv 2014