Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Effect of Coriolis Force on Diffusion of D Meson

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives the full D meson diffusion tensor in a rotating hadron gas: the Coriolis force suppresses perpendicular diffusion by $1/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2)$ and generates a Hall component $D_s(2\Omega\tau_c)/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2)$.

desk verdict A clean, internally consistent RTA derivation of Coriolis-induced anisotropic and Hall diffusion for D mesons, but the dropped centrifugal and metric terms are O(Omega*r) in the plotted regime, so the quantitative claim outruns the model. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09983 v2 pith:N3DAIRHM submitted 2024-11-15 hep-ph hep-exnucl-th

Ashutosh Dwibedi , Nandita Padhan , Dani Rose J Marattukalam , Arghya Chatterjee , Sudipan De , Sabyasachi Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-exnucl-th
keywords DmesondiffusionCoriolisforcerotatinghadrongasspatialtensorHallrelaxationtimeapproximationresonanceheavy-ioncollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a D meson moving through a hadron gas rotating around the z-axis does not diffuse equally in all directions when viewed from the gas's rest frame. Solving a relaxation-time-approximated Boltzmann equation with the Coriolis force as the only rotation effect, the authors derive a spatial diffusion tensor with three distinct parts: an unchanged component along the rotation axis, a suppressed component perpendicular to it, and a new Hall component that transports mesons perpendicular to both the density gradient and the rotation axis. The claim matters because heavy-ion collisions create vortical, rotating matter, so anisotropic diffusion of charmed mesons could leave a measurable imprint in heavy-flavor observables. The non-rotating limit of the tensor is shown to reproduce earlier estimates of D meson diffusion in hadronic matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the covariant Boltzmann equation written in the rotating frame, $p^\mu \partial_\mu f - \Gamma^\alpha_{\mu\lambda} p^\mu p^\lambda \partial f/\partial p^\alpha = -(u^\alpha p_\alpha)\delta f/\tau_c$, with Christoffel symbols computed from the rotating-frame metric and the collision term in relaxation time approximation. The Coriolis force appears as the connection-coefficient term $2(p \times \Omega)$. The perturbed distribution is solved as $\delta f = -p\cdot X \, \partial f_0/\partial E$, with $X$ decomposed in the basis formed by the chemical-potential gradient, the rotation axis, and their cross product; matching coefficients produces the conductivity tensor $\sigma_{ij}=\sigma_0\delta_{ij}+\sigma_1\epsilon_{ijk}\omega_k+\sigma_2\omega_i\omega_j$, and Einstein's relation $D_{ij}=\sigma_{ij}/\chi$ converts it into the diffusion tensor. The relaxation time is fixed by a hard-sphere hadron resonance gas model, with the scattering length tuned to earlier D meson diffusion estimates.

What would settle it

A direct extension of the same calculation that keeps the centrifugal term (or uses a fully determined rotating-frame equilibrium distribution) would settle the claim: if it changes $D^\perp_s$ or $D^\times_s$ at order $\Omega^2$, the paper's closed forms are not the complete rotating-frame result. A second test is to simulate the same system with a rotating-frame Langevin equation containing only the Coriolis force and check whether the resulting long-time mean-squared displacement reproduces the paper's $D^\perp_s$ and $D^\times_s$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a parameter-free tensor structure: in the rest frame of a rotating hadron resonance gas, the spatial diffusion coefficient of a D meson is $D^{ij}_s = (D_s/3) \mathrm{diag}(1/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2), 1/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2), 1)$ plus an antisymmetric Hall part $D^\times_s = D_s (2\Omega\tau_c)/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2)$, where $\tau_c$ is the meson's relaxation time and $\Omega$ the angular velocity. Every component follows from one force in the Boltzmann equation, the relativistic Coriolis term $2(p \times \Omega)$; the parallel component is the unmodified non-rotating $D_s$, the perpendicular component is suppressed by the Lorentz-like factor, and the Hall component is non-zero only for finite rotation. The paper argues this is the rotating-medium analogue of anisotropic diffusion in a magnetic field, and that the anisotropy grows at low temperature and high angular velocity.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the only rotational effect on the D meson is the Coriolis force, with the centrifugal and other pseudo forces dropped and the equilibrium distribution taken as the ordinary Bose-Einstein form with a static fluid velocity; if those neglected pieces contribute at the same order in $\Omega$, or if local equilibrium is different in the rotating frame, the tensor structure and the Hall component would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • D mesons diffuse faster along the rotation axis than across it, so an initially localized D meson distribution in a rotating hadron gas becomes elongated along the spin axis.
  • There is a maximal Hall response when the collisional and rotational time scales match, $2\Omega\tau_c \approx 1$, which sets the temperature and angular-velocity window where the Hall effect is most visible.
  • At high temperature or small angular velocity the perpendicular and Hall components approach the isotropic limit, so rotational anisotropy is a low-temperature, large-vorticity phenomenon.
  • Because the anisotropy enters through $\tau_c$, any reliable extraction of D meson relaxation time from data immediately determines whether rotational corrections are sizable in peripheral heavy-ion collisions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tensor ratio $D^\times_s/D_\parallel_s = 2\Omega\tau_c/(1+(2\Omega\tau_c)^2)$ should hold for any heavy-flavor hadron whose RTA relaxation time is known, making B mesons and $\Lambda_c$ baryons a testable extension the paper does not carry out.
  • Since the derivation keeps only the Coriolis force, adding the centrifugal force would introduce extra terms; one concrete extension is to compute whether those terms shift $D^\perp_s$ at order $\Omega^2$ and if so, how the Hall component changes.
  • In real heavy-ion events the local vorticity direction fluctuates event by event, so a Hall current may partially cancel in inclusive measurements; correlating D meson elliptic flow with the event-plane or global-polarization direction could expose the signed Hall contribution.
  • Quantitatively, feeding the anisotropic tensor into a Fokker-Planck or Langevin evolution of D mesons in a realistic expanding fireball could turn the predicted $R_{AA}$ modification into a falsifiable observable; this would be an explicit next step beyond the paper's static-medium calculation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper computes the spatial diffusion tensor of D mesons in a hadron resonance gas described in a frame rotating with angular velocity Ω about the z-axis. Using the relaxation-time approximation to the Boltzmann equation with only the Coriolis force retained, the authors derive a conductivity tensor with parallel, perpendicular, and Hall components (Eqs. 17-19), and then use Einstein's relation to obtain D^∥_s = D_s, D^⊥_s = D_s/[1+(2Ωτc)^2], and D^×_s = D_s (2Ωτc)/[1+(2Ωτc)^2] (Eqs. 22-24). The relaxation time is obtained from a hard-sphere scattering model, with the scattering length tuned to reproduce earlier estimates of 2πT D_s at Ω=0. The paper reports the temperature and Ω dependence of the diffusion components and argues that rotation produces anisotropy and a nonzero Hall diffusion coefficient, with possible phenomenological consequences for D-meson observables.

Significance. The formal derivation is transparent: the tensor structure follows algebraically from the linearized Boltzmann equation in the relaxation-time approximation, reduces to the known isotropic result as Ω→0, and the multiplicative factors in the perpendicular and Hall components are determined by the single combination Ωτc. The calibration of the absolute scale through the scattering length is clearly stated, and the comparison with five earlier D_s estimates in Fig. 2 provides useful context. If the rotating-frame truncation can be justified, the prediction of a rotational Hall diffusion coefficient for D mesons is a novel and falsifiable contribution to the heavy-flavor transport literature. The main weakness is not the algebra but the uncontrolled neglect of other rotating-frame effects, which are comparable in magnitude in the plotted physical regime.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II B and Appendix A, Eqs. (22)-(24)] The derivation of the anisotropic diffusion tensor retains only the Coriolis connection Γ^i_{0j} and drops the centrifugal connection Γ^i_{00}=-Ω²x^i together with the metric correction to the equilibrium distribution. The stated truncation is 'first order in Ωx, Ωy, Ω/T', but the causal condition Ωr<1 quoted in Sec. II B does not make Ωr small. At T=0.15 GeV, Ω=0.02 GeV, and r≈5 fm, Ωr≈0.5, and with the average D-meson speed v_av≈0.4 from Fig. 1 the centrifugal acceleration Ω²r and the Coriolis acceleration 2Ωv_av are of the same order. The term Γ^i_{00} p^0 p^0 ∂δf/∂p^i is not of the form (p×Ω)·∂δf/∂p used in ansatz (A5), so including it can change the relation (A7) and hence the explicit ratios D^⊥_s/D_s=1/(1+(2Ωτc)^2) and D^×_s/D_s=2Ωτc/(1+(2Ωτc)^2). Without a quantitative estimate of these O(Ωr) corrections, the attribution of the Hall and perpendicular components entirely to the Coriolis force is not established for a finite-size rotating hadron gas.
  2. [Sec. II B, Eqs. (14) and (22)-(24)] The equilibrium distribution is defined in Eq. (14) with p·u, where u^α=(1/√g00,0), but in the final integrals f0 is replaced by the flat-space Bose-Einstein form 1/(e^{E/T}-1). This replacement enters both the numerator and the denominator (susceptibility) of the diffusion coefficients. The error is O(Ω²r²) because g00=1-Ω²(x²+y²). Under the causality bound Ωr<1 this error is not uniformly small: at Ω=0.16 GeV the allowed radius extends to r≈1.2 fm, where Ω²r² can approach unity. The authors should either keep the exact p·u in f0 and in the phase-space integrals, or demonstrate numerically that the O(Ω²r²) corrections are negligible at every plotted point.
  3. [Sec. III, Figs. 3 and 4] The quantitative curves are generated for a single scattering length a=0.85 fm after calibrating τc to cover the earlier D_s estimates in Fig. 2. Because the anisotropy ratios depend on the combination 2Ωτc, the magnitude of the rotational effect inherits the calibration uncertainty in a. The text states this tuning, but the figure captions and the discussion should make explicit that the plotted results are for this calibrated τc and not a parameter-free prediction. This does not affect the algebraic tensor structure, but it is important for any quantitative comparison with future phenomenology.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I and Sec. II B] There are several typographical errors: 'Loretz factor' should be 'Lorentz factor' after Eq. (12), 'magnetic filed' should be 'magnetic field' in Sec. I, and 'the the mathematical similarity' appears in the discussion of Refs. [64-68].
  2. [Appendix A, first paragraph] The sentence 'we implicitly assumed that the Greek indices run from 0 to 4 and Latin index i run from 0 to 3' should read 'Greek indices run from 0 to 3 and Latin spatial indices run from 1 to 3'.
  3. [Sec. II B, after Eq. (14)] The sentence 'terms which are 1st order in Ωx, Ωy, and Ω/T have been retained' is not a substitute for a power-counting argument; the text should list exactly which terms are dropped and justify their smallness beyond the causality constraint.
  4. [Sec. III, Fig. 3] The left panel of Fig. 3 appears to show conductivity values over many orders of magnitude (roughly 10^{-9} to 10^{-4}), but the caption does not define the normalization or units of σ/T, σ⊥/T, and σ×/T; please clarify.
  5. [Sec. III, final paragraph] The manuscript says that anisotropic and Hall diffusion 'can have a role in the overall modification of D meson distribution function' and mentions future RAA studies, but no observable is computed. This should be presented as an outlook, not as a phenomenological result of the present paper.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Coriolis diffusion tensor is algebraically derived in Appendix A; only the zero-rotation scale is calibrated by tuning the scattering length, a minor scale-level circularity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, Fig. 2 ('After tuning...' paragraph) and Abstract]
    "Here, we have tuned D meson relaxation time from the knowledge of earlier works on its spatial diffusion estimations ... After tuning the relaxation time (by tuning a) to cover the earlier estimation of the diffusion coefficient in the absence of the rotation, we will now proceed to show the variation of perpendicular and Hall conductivity and diffusion coefficients as a function of Ω and T ."

    The scattering length a is adjusted so that Eq. (22) at Ω=0 reproduces 2πT D_s from Refs. [70,71,130-132]; thus the plotted non-rotating D_s is a benchmark interpolation, not an independent prediction. Because Eqs. (23)-(24) use the same τc with τΩ-dependent prefactors, the absolute magnitudes of D⊥ and D× inherit this calibrated scale, so the numerical values would be statistically tied to the prior estimates that set a. The normalized Ω-dependence (D⊥/D_s and D×/D_s) is, however, fixed algebraically by the Appendix A solution (Eqs. A7-A8) and was not fitted; the circularity is confined to the overall scale, not to the tensor structure itself.

full rationale

The central result, the anisotropic tensor with D⊥/D_s = 1/(1+(2Ωτc)^2) and D×/D_s = 2Ωτc/(1+(2Ωτc)^2), follows algebraically from the linearized RTA Boltzmann equation: Appendix A writes δf = -p·X ∂f0/∂E, solves the vector equation (A3) for α, β, γ, and obtains the conductivity (A7)-(A8) with the same 1/(1+(τc/τΩ)^2) prefactor; Eqs. (22)-(24) then divide by the unchanged susceptibility. No Ω-dependent parameter is fitted. The only fitted parameter is the hard-sphere scattering length a, chosen in Sec. III so the Ω=0 D_s brackets earlier estimates (Refs [70,71,130-132]); this is an acknowledged calibration of the overall scale, not a hidden fit of the anisotropy. Self-citations (Refs [35,64-66]) are used for the rotating-frame BTE framework, but the relevant equations are re-derived in Appendix A and the metric/connection coefficients are standard textbook results also cited to Refs [112-119]. The dropping of the centrifugal force and of O(Ωr) metric terms in f0 is an explicitly stated modeling truncation (Sec. II B; Appendix A states 'terms which are 1st order in Ωx, Ωy, and Ω/T have been retained'), which is a correctness risk rather than a circularity. Therefore no load-bearing circular step is present; score 2 reflects only the minor scale-level calibration and the use of self-cited framework material that is nevertheless independently reproduced.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small set of modeling choices: RTA, ideal HRG, hard-sphere scattering with a fitted length, and neglect of all pseudo-forces except Coriolis. No new entities are introduced; the angular velocity and temperature are scanned external inputs, not fitted parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • hard-sphere scattering length a = 0.18 fm and 0.85 fm
    Chosen to make the non-rotating D_s match earlier estimates: a=0.18 fm gives the upper range and a=0.85 fm the lower range of 2πT D_s in Fig. 2. All temperature and Ω dependence of the results inherits this calibration.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Collision kernel approximated by relaxation time approximation: C[f] ≈ -(uα pα) δf/τc.
    Invoked in Sec. II B, Eq. (13), to close the Boltzmann equation; assumes small deviations from equilibrium and a single relaxation time scale.
  • domain assumption Only the Coriolis pseudo-force is retained; centrifugal, Euler, and other metric-induced forces are neglected.
    Stated after Eq. (12) and in the abstract; the entire anisotropic tensor is generated by this 2(p×Ω) force, so the omission is load-bearing if other forces contribute at the same order in Ω.
  • domain assumption The D meson equilibrium distribution in the rotating frame is the Bose-Einstein form f0=1/(exp((pαuα-μD)/T)-1) with uα=(1/√g00, 0).
    Eq. (14), Sec. II B; no rotation-induced modification of local equilibrium is included, and this f0 enters every conductivity integral.
  • domain assumption The hadronic background is an ideal HRG of point-like hadrons up to mass 2.6 GeV (PDG list), and D meson scattering is hard-sphere with cross section πa².
    Sec. II C, Eqs. (25)-(26); supplies nHRG and τc, and the hard-sphere length a is the fitted parameter.
  • standard math The rotating-frame metric and connection coefficients are taken from the coordinate transformation Eq. (7), with only the Coriolis connection components Γ¹₂₀ and Γ²₁₀ retained.
    Sec. II B, Eqs. (9)-(11); standard general-relativistic tensor calculus, but the truncation of connection components to the Coriolis ones is a modeling choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of Coriolis Force on Diffusion of D Meson." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N3DAIRHM

@misc{pith2026241109983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of Coriolis Force on Diffusion of D Meson},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N3DAIRHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09983}
}
read the original abstract

We have attempted to calculate and estimate the spatial diffusion coefficients of D meson through rotating hadron resonance gas, which can be produced in the late stage of peripheral heavy ion collisions. Employing the framework of kinetic theory in relaxation time approximation, and using Einstein's diffusion relation, one can express the spatial diffusion coefficients of D meson as a ratio of its conductivity to its susceptibility. Here, we have tuned D meson relaxation time from the knowledge of earlier works on its spatial diffusion estimations, and then we have extended the framework for the finite rotation picture of hadronic matter, where only the effect of Coriolis force is considered. Our study also revealed the anisotropic nature of diffusion in the presence of rotation with future possibilities of phenomenological signature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color online) Left: Number density as a function of temperature. Right: Average velocity of D meson as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (Color online) Left: Relaxation time of D meson as a function of temperature. Right: spatial diffusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (Color online) Left: Parallel, perpendicular and Hall conductivity of D meson ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Left: Perpendicular and Hall conductivity of D meson ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards compressed baryonic matter densities: D meson diffusion

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using relaxation-time kinetic theory with a chiral hadronic model, the authors estimate that D meson spatial diffusion in dense nuclear matter decreases rapidly in a dilute-gas regime and mildly in a degenerate-gas regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Edward V. Shuryak. What RHIC experiments and theory tell us about properties of quark-gluon plasma? Nucl. Phys. A, 750:64–83, 2005. arXiv:hep-ph/0405066, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.022

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    C. Y. Wong. Introduction to high-energy heavy ion collisions. 1995. 13

    1995

  3. [3]

    P. B. Gossiaux and J. Aichelin. Toward an understanding of the single electron data measured at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider (rhic). Phys. Rev. C, 78:014904, Jul 2008. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014904, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014904

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.014904 2008

  4. [4]

    P. B. Gossiaux, R. Bierkandt, and J. Aichelin. Tomography of quark gluon plasma at energies available at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider (rhic) and the cern large hadron collider (lhc). Physical Review C, 79(4), April 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044906, doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.044906

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.044906 2009

  5. [5]

    Tomography of the quark–gluon plasma by heavy quarks

    P B Gossiaux and J Aichelin. Tomography of the quark–gluon plasma by heavy quarks. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 36(6):064028, May 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/36/6/064028, doi:10. 1088/0954-3899/36/6/064028

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/6/064028 2009

  6. [6]

    Elliptic and triangular flow of heavy flavor in heavy-ion collisions

    Marlene Nahrgang, J¨ org Aichelin, Steffen Bass, Pol Bernard Gossiaux, and Klaus Werner. Elliptic and triangular flow of heavy flavor in heavy-ion collisions. Physical Review C, 91(1), January 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.91.014904, doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.014904

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.014904 2015

  7. [7]

    Das, Francesco Scardina, Salvatore Plumari, and Vincenzo Greco

    Santosh K. Das, Francesco Scardina, Salvatore Plumari, and Vincenzo Greco. Toward a solution to the raa and v2 puzzle for heavy quarks. Physics Letters B, 747:260–264, 2015. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0370269315004256, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.003

    doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.003 2015

  8. [8]

    Das, Vincenzo Minissale, Salvatore Plumari, and Vincenzo Greco

    Francesco Scardina, Santosh K. Das, Vincenzo Minissale, Salvatore Plumari, and Vincenzo Greco. Estimating the charm quark diffusion coefficient and thermalization time from d meson spectra at energies available at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider and the cern large hadron collider. Phys. Rev. C, 96:044905, Oct 2017. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 1...

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.044905 2017

Show all 140 references
  1. [9]

    Vinod Chandra and Santosh K. Das. B-mesons as essential probes of hot QCD matter. Eur. Phys. J. ST, 233(2):429–438,

  2. [10]

    Das, Vincenzo Greco, and Marco Ruggieri

    Pooja, Santosh K. Das, Vincenzo Greco, and Marco Ruggieri. Thermalization and isotropization of heavy quarks in a non-Markovian medium in high-energy nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. D, 108(5):054026, 2023. arXiv:2306.13749, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054026

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Jai Prakash, Vinod Chandra, and Santosh K. Das. Heavy quark radiation in an anisotropic hot QCD medium. Phys. Rev. D, 108(9):096016, 2023. arXiv:2306.07966, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.096016

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Markus H. Thoma. Collisional energy loss of high-energy jets in the quark gluon plasma. Phys. Lett. B, 273:128–132,

  5. [13]

    Radiative energy loss of heavy quarks in a quark gluon plasma

    Munshi Golam Mustafa, Dipali Pal, Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, and Markus Thoma. Radiative energy loss of heavy quarks in a quark gluon plasma. Phys. Lett. B, 428:234–240, 1998. arXiv:nucl-th/9711059, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98) 00429-8

    1998 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gossiaux and J

    P.B. Gossiaux and J. Aichelin. Energy loss of heavy quarks in a qgp with a running coupling constant approach. Nuclear Physics A, 830(1–4):203c–206c, November 2009. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.10.015, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.10.015

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    Competition of heavy quark radiative and collisional energy loss in deconfined matter

    P B Gossiaux, J Aichelin, T Gousset, and V Guiho. Competition of heavy quark radiative and collisional energy loss in deconfined matter. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 37(9):094019, August 2010. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/9/094019, doi:10....

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    Das, and Vinod Chandra

    Avdhesh Kumar, Manu Kurian, Santosh K. Das, and Vinod Chandra. Drag of heavy quarks in an anisotropic QCD medium beyond the static limit. Phys. Rev. C, 105(5):054903, 2022. arXiv:2111.07563, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054903

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Marco Ruggieri, Pooja, Jai Prakash, and Santosh K. Das. Memory effects on energy loss and diffusion of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):034032, 2022. arXiv:2203.06712, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034032

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Das, and Vinod Chandra

    Jai Prakash, Manu Kurian, Santosh K. Das, and Vinod Chandra. Heavy quark transport in an anisotropic hot QCD medium: Collisional and Radiative processes. Phys. Rev. D, 103(9):094009, 2021. arXiv:2102.07082, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.103.094009

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Prompt D 0, D +, and D ∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Prompt D 0, D +, and D ∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV. JHEP, 01:174,

  12. [20]

    Open Heavy Flavor in QCD Matter and in Nuclear Collisions

    Francesco Prino and Ralf Rapp. Open Heavy Flavor in QCD Matter and in Nuclear Collisions. J. Phys. G, 43(9):093002,

  13. [21]

    Beraudo et al

    A. Beraudo et al. Extraction of Heavy-Flavor Transport Coefficients in QCD Matter. Nucl. Phys. A, 979:21–86, 2018. arXiv:1803.03824, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.002

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Das, Jan-e Alam, and Payal Mohanty

    Santosh K. Das, Jan-e Alam, and Payal Mohanty. Drag of heavy quarks in quark gluon plasma at energies available at the cern large hadron collider (lhc). Phys. Rev. C, 82:014908, Jul 2010. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.014908, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.82.014908

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Shanshan Cao, Gabriele Coci, Santosh Kumar Das, Weiyao Ke, Shuai Y. F. Liu, Salvatore Plumari, Taesoo Song, Yingru Xu, J¨ org Aichelin, Steffen Bass, Elena Bratkovskaya, Xin Dong, Pol Bernard Gossiaux, Vincenzo Greco, Min He, Marlene Nahrgang, Ralf Rapp, Francesco Scardina, an...

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Hadronization of heavy quarks, 2023

    Jiaxing Zhao, J¨ org Aichelin, Pol Bernard Gossiaux, Andrea Beraudo, Shanshan Cao, Wenkai Fan, Min He, Vincenzo Minissale, Taesoo Song, Ivan Vitev, Ralf Rapp, Steffen Bass, Elena Bratkovskaya, Vincenzo Greco, and Salvatore Plumari. Hadronization of heavy quarks, 2023. URL: htt...

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, and J. Peuron. Heavy quark diffusion in an overoccupied gluon plasma. JHEP, 09:077, 2020. arXiv:2005.02418, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)077. 14

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Das, Vincenzo Greco, and Marco Ruggieri

    Pooja, Santosh K. Das, Vincenzo Greco, and Marco Ruggieri. Anisotropic fluctuations of angular momentum of heavy quarks in the Glasma. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138(4):313, 2023. arXiv:2212.09725, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03913-6

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron. Heavy quark diffusion coefficient in heavy-ion collisions via kinetic theory. Phys. Rev. D, 109(1):014025, 2024. arXiv:2303.12520, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014025

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Pooja, Mohammad Yousuf Jamal, Partha Pratim Bhaduri, Marco Ruggieri, and Santosh K. Das. cc¯ and bb¯ suppression in the glasma. Phys. Rev. D, 110(9):094018, 2024. arXiv:2404.05315, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094018

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Heavy-quark diffusion in 2+1D and Glasma-like plasmas: evidence of a transport peak

    Liane Backfried, Kirill Boguslavski, and Paul Hotzy. Heavy-quark diffusion in 2+1D and Glasma-like plasmas: evidence of a transport peak. 8 2024. arXiv:2408.12646

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    Kirill Tuchin. Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Adv. High Energy Phys., 2013:490495, 2013. arXiv:1301.0099, doi:10.1155/2013/490495

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Skokov, A

    V. Skokov, A. Yu. Illarionov, and V. Toneev. Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24:5925–5932, 2009. arXiv:0907.1396, doi:10.1142/S0217751X09047570

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions

    Adam Bzdak and Vladimir Skokov. Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 710:171–174, 2012. arXiv:1111.1949, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.065

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Das, Salvatore Plumari, Sandeep Chatterjee, Jane Alam, Francesco Scardina, and Vincenzo Greco

    Santosh K. Das, Salvatore Plumari, Sandeep Chatterjee, Jane Alam, Francesco Scardina, and Vincenzo Greco. Directed Flow of Charm Quarks as a Witness of the Initial Strong Magnetic Field in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 768:260–264, 2017. arXiv:1608.02...

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Debjani Banerjee, Prottoy Das, Souvik Paul, Abhi Modak, Ankita Budhraja, Sabyasachi Ghosh, and Sidharth K. Prasad. Effect of magnetic field on jet transport coefficient ˆ q. Pramana, 97(4):206, 2023. arXiv:2103.14440, doi:10.1007/ s12043-023-02683-1

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Spatial diffusion of quarks in a background magnetic field

    Sarthak Satapathy, Sudipan De, Jayanta Dey, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Spatial diffusion of quarks in a background magnetic field. Phys. Rev. C, 109(2):024904, 2024. arXiv:2212.08933, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024904

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions

    Zuo-Tang Liang and Xin-Nian Wang. Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:102301, 2005. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]. arXiv:nucl-th/0410079, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.94.102301

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Becattini, F

    F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, and J. Rizzo. Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy. Phys. Rev. C, 77:024906, 2008. arXiv:0711.1253, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024906

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature, 548:62–65, 2017. arXiv:1701.06657, doi:10.1038/nature23004

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Becattini, V

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, and E. Grossi. Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium. Annals of Physics, 338:32–49, 2013. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0003491613001553, doi:https://do...

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    Son and Piotr Sur´ owka

    Dam T. Son and Piotr Sur´ owka. Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:191601, Nov 2009. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.191601, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.191601

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV

    Jaroslav Adam et al. Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C, 98:014910, 2018. arXiv:1805.04400, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014910

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(1):012301, 2020. arXiv:1910.14408, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.012301

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    M. S. Abdallah et al. Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions. Nature, 614(7947):244– 248, 2023. arXiv:2204.02302, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05557-5

    2023

  36. [44]

    Measurement of the J/ ψ Polarization with Respect to the Event Plane in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurement of the J/ ψ Polarization with Respect to the Event Plane in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(4):042303, 2023. arXiv:2204.10171, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.042303

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    On the analogy between inertial and electromagnetic forces

    J Sivardiere. On the analogy between inertial and electromagnetic forces. European Journal of Physics, 4(3):162, jul

  38. [46]

    Inertial forces and the hall effect

    B L Johnson. Inertial forces and the hall effect. Am. J. Phys., 68(7):649–653, July 2000

    2000

  39. [47]

    J. J. Sakurai. Comments on quantum-mechanical interference due to the earth’s rotation. Phys. Rev. D, 21:2993–2994, May 1980. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2993, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2993

    1980 doi

  40. [48]

    Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of the relativistic fluid in the presence of a magnetic field: A massless case

    Jayanta Dey, Sarthak Satapathy, Prasanta Murmu, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of the relativistic fluid in the presence of a magnetic field: A massless case. Pramana, 95(3):125, 2021. arXiv:1907.11164, doi:10.1007/s12043-021-02148-3

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Anisotropic transport properties of a hadron resonance gas in a magnetic field

    Ashutosh Dash, Subhasis Samanta, Jayanta Dey, Utsab Gangopadhyaya, Sabyasachi Ghosh, and Victor Roy. Anisotropic transport properties of a hadron resonance gas in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D, 102(1):016016, 2020. arXiv:2002.08781, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.016016

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Quantum expression for the electrical conductivity of massless quark matter and of the hadron resonance gas in the presence of a magnetic field

    Jayanta Dey, Subhasis Samanta, Sabyasachi Ghosh, and Sarthak Satapathy. Quantum expression for the electrical conductivity of massless quark matter and of the hadron resonance gas in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. C, 106(4):044914, 2022. arXiv:2002.04434, doi:10....

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Sabyasachi Ghosh, Aritra Bandyopadhyay, Ricardo L. S. Farias, Jayanta Dey, and Gast˜ ao Krein. Anisotropic elec- trical conductivity of magnetized hot quark matter. Phys. Rev. D, 102:114015, 2020. arXiv:1911.10005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.114015

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    From noninteracting to inter- acting picture of quark–gluon plasma in the presence of a magnetic field and its fluid property

    Jayanta Dey, Sarthak Satapathy, Ankita Mishra, Souvik Paul, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. From noninteracting to inter- acting picture of quark–gluon plasma in the presence of a magnetic field and its fluid property. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 30(06):2150044, 2021. arXiv:1908.04335, doi:10...

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Medium effects on the electrical and Hall conductivities of a hot and magnetized pion gas

    Pallavi Kalikotay, Snigdha Ghosh, Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Pradip Roy, and Sourav Sarkar. Medium effects on the electrical and Hall conductivities of a hot and magnetized pion gas. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):076007, 2020. arXiv:2009.10493, 15 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.076007

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Electrical conductivity of strongly magnetized dense quark matter - possibility of quantum Hall effect

    Jayanta Dey, Aritra Bandyopadhyay, Akash Gupta, Naman Pujari, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Electrical conductivity of strongly magnetized dense quark matter - possibility of quantum Hall effect. Nucl. Phys. A, 1034:122654, 2023. arXiv: 2103.15364, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2023.122654

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Kubo estimation of the electrical conductivity for a hot relativistic fluid in the presence of a magnetic field

    Sarthak Satapathy, Snigdha Ghosh, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Kubo estimation of the electrical conductivity for a hot relativistic fluid in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D, 104(5):056030, 2021. arXiv:2104.03917, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.056030

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Mohapatra

    Arpan Das, Hiranmaya Mishra, and Ranjita K. Mohapatra. Electrical conductivity and Hall conductivity of a hot and dense hadron gas in a magnetic field: A relaxation time approach. Phys. Rev. D, 99(9):094031, 2019. arXiv:1903.03938, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094031

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mohapatra

    Arpan Das, Hiranmaya Mishra, and Ranjita K. Mohapatra. Electrical conductivity and Hall conductivity of a hot and dense quark gluon plasma in a magnetic field: A quasiparticle approach. Phys. Rev. D, 101(3):034027, 2020. arXiv: 1907.05298, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034027

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Centrality dependence of Electrical and Hall conductivity at RHIC and LHC energies for a Conformal System.Eur

    Bhaswar Chatterjee, Rutuparna Rath, Golam Sarwar, and Raghunath Sahoo. Centrality dependence of Electrical and Hall conductivity at RHIC and LHC energies for a Conformal System.Eur. Phys. J. A, 57(2):45, 2021. arXiv:1908.01121, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00348-4

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Electrical Conductivity of Quark-Gluon Plasma in Strong Magnetic Fields

    Koichi Hattori and Daisuke Satow. Electrical Conductivity of Quark-Gluon Plasma in Strong Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. D, 94(11):114032, 2016. arXiv:1610.06818, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114032

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Longitudinal Conductivity in Strong Magnetic Field in Perturbative QCD: Complete Leading Order

    Koichi Hattori, Shiyong Li, Daisuke Satow, and Ho-Ung Yee. Longitudinal Conductivity in Strong Magnetic Field in Perturbative QCD: Complete Leading Order. Phys. Rev. D, 95(7):076008, 2017. arXiv:1610.06839, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.95.076008

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Quantum field theoretical structure of electrical conductivity of cold and dense fermionic matter in the presence of a magnetic field

    Sarthak Satapathy, Snigdha Ghosh, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Quantum field theoretical structure of electrical conductivity of cold and dense fermionic matter in the presence of a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):036006, 2022. arXiv: 2112.08236, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.036006

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    David Dudal and Thomas G. Mertens. Melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model. Phys. Rev. D, 91:086002, 2015. arXiv:1410.3297, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.086002

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    David Dudal and Thomas G. Mertens. Holographic estimate of heavy quark diffusion in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D, 97(5):054035, 2018. arXiv:1802.02805, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.054035

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Effect of Coriolis force on the shear viscosity of quark matter: A nonrelativistic description

    Cho Win Aung, Ashutosh Dwibedi, Jayanta Dey, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Effect of Coriolis force on the shear viscosity of quark matter: A nonrelativistic description. Phys. Rev. C, 109(3):034913, 2024. arXiv:2303.16462, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.109.034913

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Effect of the Coriolis force on the electrical conductivity of quark matter: A nonrelativistic description

    Ashutosh Dwibedi, Cho Win Aung, Jayanta Dey, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Effect of the Coriolis force on the electrical conductivity of quark matter: A nonrelativistic description. Phys. Rev. C, 109(3):034914, 2024. arXiv:2305.10183, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.034914

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Effect of Coriolis force on electrical conductivity tensor for the rotating hadron resonance gas

    Nandita Padhan, Ashutosh Dwibedi, Arghya Chatterjee, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Effect of Coriolis force on electrical conductivity tensor for the rotating hadron resonance gas. Phys. Rev. C, 110(2):024904, 2024. arXiv:2403.16647, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.024904

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of rotating quark matter in Nambu–Jona-Lasinio Model

    Ashutosh Dwibedi, Dushmanta Sahu, Jayanta Dey, Kangkan Goswami, Sabyasachi Ghosh, and Raghunath Sahoo. Shear viscosity and electrical conductivity of rotating quark matter in Nambu–Jona-Lasinio Model. 5 2025. arXiv:2505.03588

    2025

  60. [68]

    Marattukalam, Nandita Padhan, Arghya Chatterjee, and Sabyasachi Ghosh

    Ashutosh Dwibedi, Dani Rose J. Marattukalam, Nandita Padhan, Arghya Chatterjee, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Effect of Coriolis Force on the Shear Viscosity of Rotating Nuclear Medium. 4 2025. arXiv:2504.16049

    2025

  61. [69]

    Das, Jan-e Alam, and Sabyasachi Ghosh

    Mahfuzur Rahaman, Santosh K. Das, Jan-e Alam, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Effect of magnetic screening mass on the diffu- sion of heavy quarks. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 30(12):2150093, 2021. arXiv:2001.07071, doi:10.1142/S0218301321500932

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Ozvenchuk, J

    V. Ozvenchuk, J. M. Torres-Rincon, P. B. Gossiaux, J. Aichelin, and L. Tolos. d-meson propagation in hadronic matter and consequences for heavy-flavor observables in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 90:054909, Nov 2014. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.110...

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    Das, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam

    Sabyasachi Ghosh, Santosh K. Das, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam. Drag coefficient of d mesons in hot hadronic matter. Phys. Rev. D, 84:011503, Jul 2011. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.011503, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.011503

    2011 doi

  64. [72]

    Das, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam

    Santosh K. Das, Sabyasachi Ghosh, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam. Drag and diffusion coefficients of B mesons in hot hadronic matter. Phys. Rev. D, 85:074017, 2012. arXiv:1109.3359, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.074017

    2012 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Das, Vincenzo Greco, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam

    Sabyasachi Ghosh, Santosh K. Das, Vincenzo Greco, Sourav Sarkar, and Jan-e Alam. Diffusion of Λ c in hot hadronic medium and its impact on Λ c/D ratio. Phys. Rev. D, 90(5):054018, 2014. arXiv:1407.5069, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 90.054018

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Das, Juan M

    Santosh K. Das, Juan M. Torres-Rincon, and Ralf Rapp. Charm and Bottom Hadrons in Hot Hadronic Matter. 6 2024. arXiv:2406.13286

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Review of Particle Physics

    Claude Amsler et al. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Lett. B, 667:1–1340, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018

    2008 doi

  68. [76]

    Karsch, K

    F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik. Thermodynamics at nonzero baryon number density: A Comparison of lattice and hadron resonance gas model calculations. Phys. Lett. B, 571:67–74, 2003. arXiv:hep-ph/0306208, doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2003.08.001

    2003 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Vovchenko, D

    V. Vovchenko, D. V. Anchishkin, and M. I. Gorenstein. Hadron Resonance Gas Equation of State from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. C, 91(2):024905, 2015. arXiv:1412.5478, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024905

    2015 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Thermal-FIST: A package for heavy-ion collisions and hadronic equation of state

    Volodymyr Vovchenko and Horst Stoecker. Thermal-FIST: A package for heavy-ion collisions and hadronic equation of state. Comput. Phys. Commun., 244:295–310, 2019. arXiv:1901.05249, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.06.024. 16

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Thermodynamics of a rotating hadron resonance gas with van der waals interaction

    Kshitish Kumar Pradhan, Bhagyarathi Sahoo, Dushmanta Sahu, and Raghunath Sahoo. Thermodynamics of a rotating hadron resonance gas with van der waals interaction. The European Physical Journal C, 84:936, Sep 2024. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-1...

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    V. V. Begun, Mark I. Gorenstein, M. Hauer, V. P. Konchakovski, and O. S. Zozulya. Multiplicity Fluctuations in Hadron-Resonance Gas. Phys. Rev. C, 74:044903, 2006. arXiv:nucl-th/0606036, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044903

    2006 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Impact of resonance regeneration and decay on the net-proton fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas

    Marlene Nahrgang, Marcus Bluhm, Paolo Alba, Rene Bellwied, and Claudia Ratti. Impact of resonance regeneration and decay on the net-proton fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas. Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(12):573, 2015. arXiv:1402.1238, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3775-0

    2015 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model. Phys. Rev. D, 86:034509, 2012. arXiv:1203.0784, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.034509

    2012 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Ghosh, Rajarshi Ray, and Subhasis Samanta

    Abhijit Bhattacharyya, Supriya Das, Sanjay K. Ghosh, Rajarshi Ray, and Subhasis Samanta. Fluctuations and cor- relations of conserved charges in an excluded volume hadron resonance gas model. Phys. Rev. C, 90(3):034909, 2014. arXiv:1310.2793, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.034909

    2014 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Nayak, and Nihar Ranjan Sahoo

    Arghya Chatterjee, Sandeep Chatterjee, Tapan K. Nayak, and Nihar Ranjan Sahoo. Diagonal and off-diagonal suscepti- bilities of conserved quantities in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. J. Phys. G, 43(12):125103, 2016. arXiv:1606.09573, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/12/125103

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Gorenstein, and Horst Stoecker

    Volodymyr Vovchenko, Lijia Jiang, Mark I. Gorenstein, and Horst Stoecker. Critical point of nuclear matter and beam energy dependence of net proton number fluctuations. Phys. Rev. C, 98(2):024910, 2018. arXiv:1711.07260, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024910

    2018 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Moritz Greif, Carsten Greiner, and Gabriel S. Denicol. Electric conductivity of a hot hadron gas from a kinetic approach. Phys. Rev. D, 93(9):096012, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 059902 (2017)]. arXiv:1602.05085, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 93.096012

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Venugopalan, and G

    Madappa Prakash, Manju Prakash, R. Venugopalan, and G. Welke. Nonequilibrium properties of hadronic mixtures. Phys. Rept., 227:321–366, 1993. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(93)90092-R

    1993 doi

  80. [88]

    M. I. Gorenstein, M. Hauer, and O. N. Moroz. Viscosity in the excluded volume hadron gas model. Phys. Rev. C, 77:024911, 2008. arXiv:0708.0137, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024911

    2008 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Hadron Mass Spectrum and the Shear Viscosity to Entropy Density Ratio of Hot Hadronic Matter

    Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler, Jorge Noronha, and Carsten Greiner. Hadron Mass Spectrum and the Shear Viscosity to Entropy Density Ratio of Hot Hadronic Matter. Phys. Rev. C, 86:024913, 2012. arXiv:1206.5138, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.86.024913

    2012 arXiv

  82. [90]

    S. K. Tiwari, P. K. Srivastava, and C. P. Singh. Description of Hot and Dense Hadron Gas Properties in a New Excluded- Volume model. Phys. Rev. C, 85:014908, 2012. arXiv:1111.2406, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014908

    2012 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Conductivity, diffusivity, and violation of the Wiedemann-Franz Law in a hadron resonance gas with van der Waals interactions

    Kshitish Kumar Pradhan, Dushmanta Sahu, Ronald Scaria, and Raghunath Sahoo. Conductivity, diffusivity, and violation of the Wiedemann-Franz Law in a hadron resonance gas with van der Waals interactions. Phys. Rev. C, 107(1):014910,

  84. [92]

    Shear viscosity of a pion gas resulting fromρππ and σππ interactions

    Sabyasachi Ghosh, Gast˜ ao Krein, and Sourav Sarkar. Shear viscosity of a pion gas resulting fromρππ and σππ interactions. Phys. Rev. C, 89(4):045201, 2014. arXiv:1401.5392, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.045201

    2014 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Transport Coefficients of Relativistic Matter: A Detailed Formalism with a Gross Knowledge of Their Magnitude

    Ashutosh Dwibedi, Nandita Padhan, Arghya Chatterjee, and Sabyasachi Ghosh. Transport Coefficients of Relativistic Matter: A Detailed Formalism with a Gross Knowledge of Their Magnitude. Universe, 10(3):132, 2024. arXiv:2404. 01421, doi:10.3390/universe10030132

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    Wiranata, V

    A. Wiranata, V. Koch, M. Prakash, and X. N. Wang. Shear viscosity of a multi-component hadronic system. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 509:012049, 2014. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/509/1/012049

    2014 doi

  87. [95]

    Transport Coefficients of Hadronic Matter near T(c)

    Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler, Jorge Noronha, and Carsten Greiner. Transport Coefficients of Hadronic Matter near T(c). Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:172302, 2009. arXiv:0811.1571, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.172302

    2009 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Bulk and shear viscosities of hot and dense hadron gas

    Guru Prakash Kadam and Hiranmaya Mishra. Bulk and shear viscosities of hot and dense hadron gas. Nucl. Phys. A, 934:133–147, 2014. arXiv:1408.6329, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.12.004

    2014 arXiv

  89. [97]

    J. B. Rose, J. M. Torres-Rincon, A. Sch¨ afer, D. R. Oliinychenko, and H. Petersen. Shear viscosity of a hadron gas and influence of resonance lifetimes on relaxation time. Phys. Rev. C, 97(5):055204, 2018. arXiv:1709.03826, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.055204

    2018 arXiv

  90. [98]

    HEA VY QUARKS IN THE QUARK-GLUON PLASMA , pages 111–206

    RALF RAPP and HENDRIK V AN HEES. HEA VY QUARKS IN THE QUARK-GLUON PLASMA , pages 111–206. URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789814293297_0003, arXiv:https://www. worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789814293297\_0003, doi:10.1142/9789814293297\_0003

    doi

  91. [99]

    Heavy quark production and properties of quark–gluon plasma

    Xin Dong and Vincenzo Greco. Heavy quark production and properties of quark–gluon plasma. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 104:97–141, 2019. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641018300723, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.08.001

    2019 doi

  92. [100]

    Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark–gluon plasma

    Min He, Hendrik van Hees, and Ralf Rapp. Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark–gluon plasma. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 130:104020, 2023. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641023000017, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104020

    2023

  93. [101]

    Fokker-Planck Equation, pages 63–95

    Hannes Risken. Fokker-Planck Equation, pages 63–95. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3_4

    1996 doi

  94. [102]

    R. Zwanzig. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 2001. URL: https://books.google.co.in/ books?id=4cI5136OdoMC

    2001

  95. [103]

    Debbasch, K

    F. Debbasch, K. Mallick, and J. P. Rivet. Relativistic ornstein–uhlenbeck process.Journal of Statistical Physics, 88(3):945– 966, Aug 1997. doi:10.1023/B:JOSS.0000015180.16261.53. 17

    1997

  96. [104]

    Svetitsky

    B. Svetitsky. Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D, 37:2484–2491, 1988. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.37.2484

    1988

  97. [105]

    Moore and Derek Teaney

    Guy D. Moore and Derek Teaney. How much do heavy quarks thermalize in a heavy ion collision? Phys. Rev. C, 71:064904, 2005. arXiv:hep-ph/0412346, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064904

    2005 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Gossiaux, Rainer J

    Min He, Hendrik van Hees, Pol B. Gossiaux, Rainer J. Fries, and Ralf Rapp. Relativistic Langevin Dynamics in Expanding Media. Phys. Rev. E, 88:032138, 2013. arXiv:1305.1425, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.88.032138

    2013 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Thermalization of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma

    Hendrik van Hees and Ralf Rapp. Thermalization of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. C, 71:034907,

  100. [108]

    Das, Jan-e Alam, and Payal Mohanty

    Santosh K. Das, Jan-e Alam, and Payal Mohanty. Probing quark gluon plasma properties by heavy flavors. Phys. Rev. C, 80:054916, Nov 2009. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.054916, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80. 054916

    2009 doi

  101. [109]

    Momentum dependence of drag co- efficients and heavy flavour suppression in quark gluon plasma

    Surasree Mazumder, Trambak Bhattacharyya, Jan-e Alam, and Santosh K Das. Momentum dependence of drag co- efficients and heavy flavour suppression in quark gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. C, 84:044901, 2011. arXiv:1106.2615, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044901

    2011 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Capellino, A

    F. Capellino, A. Beraudo, A. Dubla, S. Floerchinger, S. Masciocchi, J. Pawlowski, and I. Selyuzhenkov. Fluid-dynamic approach to heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D, 106:034021, Aug 2022. URL: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034021, doi...

    2022 doi

  103. [111]

    Heavy quark diffusion from the lattice

    Peter Petreczky and Derek Teaney. Heavy quark diffusion from the lattice. Phys. Rev. D, 73:014508, 2006. arXiv: hep-ph/0507318, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.014508

    2006 arXiv

  104. [112]

    M. N. Chernodub and Shinya Gongyo. Effects of rotation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions. Phys. Rev. D, 95(9):096006, 2017. arXiv:1702.08266, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.096006

    2017 arXiv

  105. [113]

    M. N. Chernodub and Shinya Gongyo. Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, moment of inertia and thermodynamics. JHEP, 01:136, 2017. arXiv:1611.02598, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)136

    2017 arXiv

  106. [114]

    M. N. Chernodub. Inhomogeneous confining-deconfining phases in rotating plasmas. Phys. Rev. D, 103(5):054027, 2021. arXiv:2012.04924, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054027

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Deconfining phase boundary of rapidly rotating hot and dense matter and analysis of moment of inertia

    Yuki Fujimoto, Kenji Fukushima, and Yoshimasa Hidaka. Deconfining phase boundary of rapidly rotating hot and dense matter and analysis of moment of inertia. Physics Letters B, 816:136184, 2021. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0370269321001246, doi:http...

    2021

  108. [116]

    Tensor Calculus in General Coordinates, pages 271–290

    Carlo Cercignani and Gilberto Medeiros Kremer. Tensor Calculus in General Coordinates, pages 271–290. Birkh¨ auser Basel, Basel, 2002. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8165-4_10

    2002 doi

  109. [117]

    Misner, K.S

    C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler, and D.I. Kaiser. Gravitation. Princeton University Press, 2017. URL: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=zAAuDwAAQBAJ

    2017

  110. [118]

    B. Schutz. A First Course in General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2009. URL: https://books.google.co. in/books?id=V1CGLi58W7wC

    2009

  111. [119]

    Kapusta, Ermal Rrapaj, and Serge Rudaz

    Joseph I. Kapusta, Ermal Rrapaj, and Serge Rudaz. Relaxation Time for Strange Quark Spin in Rotating Quark-Gluon Plasma. Phys. Rev. C, 101(2):024907, 2020. arXiv:1907.10750, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.024907

    2020 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Classical mechanics

    Herbert Goldstein. Classical mechanics. Pearson Education India, 2011

    2011

  113. [121]

    Kleppner and R

    D. Kleppner and R. Kolenkow. An Introduction to Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2014. URL: https://books. google.co.in/books?id=Se7CAQAAQBAJ

    2014

  114. [122]

    Karsch and K

    F. Karsch and K. Redlich. Probing freeze-out conditions in heavy ion collisions with moments of charge fluctu- ations. Physics Letters B, 695(1):136–142, 2011. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0370269310012578, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.10.046

    2011 doi

  115. [123]

    Garg, D.K

    P. Garg, D.K. Mishra, P.K. Netrakanti, B. Mohanty, A.K. Mohanty, B.K. Singh, and N. Xu. Conserved number fluctu- ations in a hadron resonance gas model. Physics Letters B, 726(4):691–696, 2013. URL: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0370269313007363, doi:http...

    2013 doi

  116. [124]

    Vovchenko, D

    V. Vovchenko, D. V. Anchishkin, M. I. Gorenstein, and R. V. Poberezhnyuk. Scaled variance, skewness, and kurtosis near the critical point of nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. C, 92:054901, Nov 2015. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.92.054901, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054901

    2015 doi

  117. [125]

    Poberezhnyuk, Mark I

    Oleh Savchuk, Volodymyr Vovchenko, Roman V. Poberezhnyuk, Mark I. Gorenstein, and Horst Stoecker. Traces of the nuclear liquid-gas phase transition in the analytic properties of hot qcd. Phys. Rev. C, 101:035205, Mar 2020. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.035...

    2020 doi

  118. [126]

    D. K. Mishra, P. Garg, P. K. Netrakanti, and A. K. Mohanty. Effect of resonance decay on conserved number fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas model. Phys. Rev. C, 94:014905, Jul 2016. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevC.94.014905, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014905

    2016 doi

  119. [127]

    Albright, J

    M. Albright, J. Kapusta, and C. Young. Matching excluded-volume hadron-resonance gas models and perturbative qcd to lattice calculations. Phys. Rev. C, 90:024915, Aug 2014. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90. 024915, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024915

    2014 doi

  120. [128]

    Bernstein

    Roger Dashen, Shang-Keng Ma, and Herbert J. Bernstein. S Matrix formulation of statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev., 187:345–370, 1969. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.187.345

    1969 doi

  121. [129]

    R. F. Dashen and R. Rajaraman. Narrow Resonances in Statistical Mechanics. Phys. Rev. D, 10:694, 1974. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.694

    1974 doi

  122. [130]

    Fries, and Ralf Rapp

    Min He, Rainer J. Fries, and Ralf Rapp. Thermal Relaxation of Charm in Hadronic Matter. Phys. Lett. B, 701:445–450,

  123. [131]

    Torres-Rincon, Gl` oria Monta˜ na,`Angels Ramos, and Laura Tolos

    Juan M. Torres-Rincon, Gl` oria Monta˜ na,`Angels Ramos, and Laura Tolos. In-medium kinetic theory of D mesons and heavy-flavor transport coefficients. Phys. Rev. C, 105(2):025203, 2022. arXiv:2106.01156, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105. 025203

    2022 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Diffusion and fluctuations of open charmed hadrons in an interacting hadronic medium

    Kangkan Goswami, Kshitish Kumar Pradhan, Dushmanta Sahu, and Raghunath Sahoo. Diffusion and fluctuations of open charmed hadrons in an interacting hadronic medium. Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):074011, 2023. arXiv:2307.04396, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074011

    2023 arXiv

  125. [1983]

    URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/4/3/007, doi:10.1088/0143-0807/4/3/007

    doi

  126. [1991]

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90565-8

    doi

  127. [2005]

    arXiv:nucl-th/0412015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.034907

    arXiv

  128. [2011]

    arXiv:1103.6279, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.06.019. 18

    2011 arXiv

  129. [2016]

    arXiv:1603.00529, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/9/093002

    arXiv

  130. [2022]

    arXiv:2110.09420, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)174

    2022 arXiv

  131. [2023]

    arXiv:2205.03149, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014910

    arXiv

  132. [2024]

    arXiv:2402.18870, doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01123-4

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.