Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

On the thermodynamics of the black holes of the Cano-Ruip\'erez 4-dimensional string effective action

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black holes of the Cano–Ruipérez string effective action satisfy an extended Smarr formula in which the string length is a thermodynamic variable with its own chemical potential, and the scalar charges are fixed by horizon geometry.

desk verdict Solid Wald-formalism derivation of a Smarr formula for the Cano–Ruipérez action; the new axion-dependent term is real but never exercised by the paper's own checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10417 v1 pith:76YICLC4 submitted 2024-11-15 hep-th gr-qc

Tomás Ortín , Matteo Zatti This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.70.Bw04.50.Kd11.25.-w
keywords blackholethermodynamicsSmarrformulaalpha-primecorrectionsstringeffectiveactiondilaton-Gauss-Bonnetgravityaxion-PontrjagincouplingscalarhairNoetherchargeentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that in the Cano–Ruipérez four-dimensional string effective action, the string length enters black-hole thermodynamics as a genuine variable. To see this, the authors promote the constant $\alpha'$ to a scalar field $\ell_s$ forced to be constant by a Lagrange multiplier, and then build the on-shell closed generalized Komar, dilaton, and axion 2-form charges of the extended theory. Using these charges they derive the Smarr formula $M = 2TS + \ell_s \Phi_{\ell_s} - \frac{1}{2}(1+\chi_\infty)\alpha'\Upsilon$ and prove no-(primary)-hair relations $\Sigma = 2\ell_s \Phi_{\ell_s} - \ell_s^2 \Upsilon$. If correct, the $\alpha'$ corrections of string-theory black holes satisfy a consistent extended first law, with the string length playing the role of charge and its chemical potential fixed by the scalar charges.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the CR2 action, in which the constant $\alpha'$ is replaced by a scalar $\ell_s(x)$ and the constraint $d\ell_s=0$ is imposed by a 3-form Lagrange multiplier $C$ with gauge symmetry $C\to C+d\Lambda$. The argument is carried by the on-shell closed 2-form charges obtained from this action: the generalized Komar charge $K[k]$, whose integrals give $\tfrac12 M$ at infinity and $TS$ on the bifurcation sphere, and the scalar charges $Q_\varphi[k]$ and $Q_\chi[k]$, whose closure under the Killing flow produces the no-hair identities. The momentum map $P_k$ of the Killing vector, which obeys $\imath_k dC + dP_k = 0$, is what converts the $\ell_s$ equation into the chemical potential $\Phi_{\ell_s}$, so the two sides of the Smarr formula are tied together by the same object.

What would settle it

Compute the boundary terms of the Noether charge on a CR2 solution with a domain wall in $\ell_s$ (or on a Taub–NUT-type solution with nonvanishing axion charge) by integrating the closed generalized Komar 2-form over a hypersurface whose boundary includes the horizon and infinity. If $\int_{\mathcal{B_H}} K[k]$ and $\int_{S^2_\infty} K[k]$ differ by a nonzero contribution from the auxiliary fields $C$ and $\ell_s$, the Smarr formula needs extra terms; any regular stationary solution with $\Sigma \neq 2\ell_s\Phi_{\ell_s} - \ell_s^2\Upsilon$ would refute the no-hair relation directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the thermodynamic identity governing black holes of the CR action is the extended Smarr formula $$M = 2TS + \ell_s \Phi_{\ell_s} - \tfrac{1}{2}(1+\chi_\infty)\$\alpha$'\Upsilon,$$ with the string length $\ell_s$ (the square root of $\alpha'$) acting as a thermodynamic variable and $\Phi_{\ell_s}$ its chemical potential. The derivation promotes $\alpha'$ to a scalar field in an extended action, adds a Lagrange-multiplier 3-form $C$ forcing $d\ell_s=0$, and constructs on-shell closed generalized Komar and scalar 2-form charges. Integrals of these charges over the horizon and spatial infinity yield the Smarr relation together with the no-primary-hair identities $\Sigma=2\ell_s\Phi_{\ell_s}-\ell_s^2\Upsilon$ and $\Upsilon=-\frac{\kappa}{8\pi}\int_{\mathcal{B_H}}R^{ab}n_{ab}$. The authors verify the formula and the first law to first order in $\alpha'$ for the Schwarzschild and slowly rotating Kerr solutions, in which $\Phi_{\ell_s}=\Sigma/(2\ell_s)$, and note that the entropy contains gravitational charges built from the horizon binormal that go beyond the standard area term.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the charges of the extended CR2 theory faithfully reproduce those of the original CR theory, including boundary contributions from the auxiliary fields $C$ and $\ell_s$ at infinity and on the horizon; the Schwarzschild and slowly rotating Kerr checks provide evidence only for the dilaton sector, since the axion charge vanishes in both.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every regular black hole of the CR theory, the Smarr formula acquires the $\alpha'$ work terms $\ell_s\Phi_{\ell_s}$ and $-\tfrac12(1+\chi_\infty)\alpha'\Upsilon$; without them the first-order identity fails.
  • The string length $\alpha'^{1/2}$ is a thermodynamic variable conjugate to $\Phi_{\ell_s}$, and variations of $\alpha'$ enter the first law as $-\Phi_{\ell_s}\delta\ell_s$.
  • The dilaton and axion charges of any stationary black hole with a bifurcate horizon are fixed by horizon data, giving no-(primary)-hair theorems for both scalars.
  • In the slow-rotation Kerr solution the axion charge vanishes at first order, so the axion-dependent Smarr term is invisible in that check, leaving the axion sector tested only by the general horizon identities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the horizon identity $\Upsilon = -\frac{\kappa}{8\pi}\int_{\mathcal{B_H}}R^{ab}n_{ab}$ suggests that any black hole with nonvanishing Pontrjagin source, such as a NUT-charged spacetime, should carry a nonzero axion charge set by the NUT parameter; this is testable once the $\alpha'$ corrections to Taub–NUT-type solutions are worked out.
  • Extension: the same Lagrange-multiplier promotion could be applied to other dimensionful couplings in effective theories, turning each constant into a charge with its own chemical potential and producing the corresponding extended Smarr formulas.
  • Extension: if the relation $\Sigma = 2\ell_s\Phi_{\ell_s} - \ell_s^2\Upsilon$ holds beyond the static spherical examples, it gives a universal link between scalar hair and dual-graviton-type gravitational charges, potentially connecting these no-hair theorems to the magnetic-mass interpretation of NUT charge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the thermodynamic properties of black-hole solutions of the Cano-Ruipérez (CR) four-dimensional string effective action, which contains a dilaton and an axion coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet and Pontrjagin densities. To obtain a Smarr formula in which the string length α' = ℓ_s^2 is a thermodynamic variable, the authors promote ℓ_s to a scalar field and introduce a Lagrange-multiplier 3-form C, defining an extended action they call CR2. Using Wald's formalism, they construct generalized Komar, dilaton, and axion 2-form charges, derive a Smarr formula, prove no-primary-hair relations for the scalar charges, and test the results on α'-corrected Schwarzschild and slowly rotating Kerr black holes. The central results are Eq. (6.13), M = 2TS + ℓ_s Φ_{ℓ_s} - (1/2)(1+χ_∞)α'Υ, together with the no-hair relations (5.10a), (5.10b), and (5.11).

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the paper gives a clean Wald-formalism treatment of stringy α' corrections in which the string length genuinely enters as a thermodynamic variable, and it connects scalar charges to horizon geometry via the no-hair relations. The derivation is detailed and internally consistent, and the explicit Schwarzschild and Kerr checks confirm the new ℓ_s term and the first law in cases where the axion charge vanishes. The paper also identifies a new term depending on the asymptotic axion value χ_∞, whose shift dependence compensates the shift non-invariance of the Wald entropy. These are useful and nontrivial results for the black-hole chemistry of α'-corrected string gravity. The main weakness is that the novel axion-dependent term is never exercised by an explicit solution with nonzero axion charge, and the equivalence between charges computed in the extended CR2 action and physical charges of the original CR theory is not fully established at the level of boundary terms.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.2, Eq. (6.23f) and Eq. (6.13)] The new axion-dependent term -1/2(1+χ_∞)α'Υ in the Smarr formula (6.13), together with the no-hair relation (5.11) involving Υ, is never tested by the explicit examples in the paper: for both Schwarzschild and slow-rotating Kerr, Υ = O(α'^2) (Eq. 6.23f), because the Pontrjagin source decays faster than the Gauss-Bonnet source. Since the derivation of (5.10a) relies on the closure of Q_n[k] and on the treatment of the Lorentz-covariant correction, an error in that sector would not be detected by these checks. The paper itself states in Section 7 that a nonvanishing-Υ example (Taub-NUT) is work in progress. I consider this the main load-bearing gap: the central claim includes a term that is currently unverified in any nontrivial case. I recommend supplying at least one explicit solution with Υ ≠ 0, or alternatively a direct independent derivation of (5.10a) that does not rely on the vanishing examples.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (4.26b) and Eq. (6.6)] The paper constructs the extended CR2 action by promoting ℓ_s to a field and adding a Lagrange-multiplier 3-form C, and it argues on-shell equivalence with the original CR theory. However, the Noether-Wald and Komar charges of the extended theory contain additional terms, such as -ℓ_s P_ξ and Δ_a ξ^a in Eq. (4.26b), and the authors do not prove that the integrals of these charges over the bifurcation sphere and at spatial infinity reproduce the physical mass, entropy, and scalar charges of the original CR theory. The Schwarzschild and Kerr checks cover only cases with constant scalars at zeroth order and vanishing axion charge, so they do not test the boundary structure of the extension in general. A general argument showing that the C and ℓ_s boundary contributions vanish or match the original theory would remove this ambiguity.
  3. [Section 5, footnote 7, and Eqs. (6.19), (6.27)] The normalization of the chemical potential Φ_{ℓ_s} is fixed by requiring that the Smarr formula take its standard form (footnote 7), and the explicit first law checks in Eqs. (6.20) and (6.28) are then consistent with that choice. This makes the thermodynamic interpretation of ℓ_s partly a convention rather than an independent derivation. The paper should state more explicitly that the identification of ℓ_s as a thermodynamic charge is fixed by this normalization choice, and it should discuss whether a different normalization would alter the physical interpretation. This is not an error, but it is important for calibrating the strength of the claim that ℓ_s is a thermodynamic variable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'we used them to find' should be 'we use them to find' for grammatical consistency.
  2. [Section 1.1, Eq. (1.8)] The quantity χ(M) defined in Eq. (1.8) is introduced but never used later in the paper; either use it in the main text or remove it to avoid distraction.
  3. [Section 2, first paragraph] The sentence 'In the rest of this section we are going to derive its equation of motion' should be pluralized to 'equations of motion', matching the content that follows.
  4. [Section 6.2, Eq. (6.21a)] In Eq. (6.21a), the notation '480a2m2 cos2 θ / r6' is clear from context but would be more readable with explicit powers: 480 a^2 m^2 cos^2 θ / r^6.
  5. [Section 7, first paragraph] The phrase 'the second of them' in the discussion of the Smarr formula terms is slightly ambiguous; 'the second term' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The ℓ_sΦ_ℓs term in the Smarr formula is definitional: the chemical potential is normalized so that the formula takes its advertised 'standard form'. The underlying Komar derivation and explicit checks remain independent, so the circularity is mild.

  1. self definitional [Section 5, footnote 7 (after Eq. (5.11)); used in Eq. (6.13)]
    "The normalization of Φ_{ℓ_s} is fixed requiring that ℓ_s is the associated charge and that the Smarr formula has the standard form."

    By the no-hair relation Eq. (5.11), Σ = 2ℓ_sΦ_{ℓ_s} - ℓ_s^2Υ, so Φ_{ℓ_s} is not an independent thermodynamic potential but a name for (Σ + ℓ_s^2Υ)/(2ℓ_s). The advertised Smarr formula, Eq. (6.13), M = 2TS + ℓ_sΦ_{ℓ_s} - 1/2(1+χ∞)α'Υ, is obtained from the derived relation Eq. (6.12), M = 2TS + 1/2(Σ - ℓ_s^2χ∞Υ), by substituting Eq. (5.11). Since the normalization of Φ_{ℓ_s} is chosen precisely so that the formula takes this standard form, the presence of the ℓ_sΦ_{ℓ_s} term is true by construction. The underlying relation (6.12) is still a nontrivial result derived from the Komar integral and checked on explicit solutions; only the repackaged chemical-potential presentation is definitional.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation is self-contained: the Noether-Wald charge, generalized Komar charge, scalar-charge no-hair relations, and the Smarr formula are derived within Sections 2-6 using Wald's formalism and the explicit CR2 action. The Schwarzschild and slow-rotating Kerr checks are genuine independent verifications of Eq. (6.12) at the level of M, T, S, J, and Σ read off from explicit solutions. The one definitional step is the normalization of the chemical potential Φ_{ℓ_s} in footnote 7: the ℓ_sΦ_{ℓ_s} term in the 'conventional' Smarr formula (6.13) is a rewriting of the derived relation (6.12) together with the no-hair relation (5.11), rather than a new independent prediction. This is a mild circularity in presentation, not in the core computation. The paper also relies on several same-author citations for the extension method and for the expectation that α' acts as a thermodynamic variable ([13], [15], [16], [21], [25]); however, the relevant charges and identities are re-derived in this paper, so the citations are contextual rather than load-bearing. The axion-sector term -1/2(1+χ∞)α'Υ is not tested in any solution with nonzero Υ (both checks have Υ = O(α'^2)), but that is a verification gap, not a circularity. Overall the central claim has independent content; the circularity score is elevated only by the explicitly definitional normalization of Φ_{ℓ_s}.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard Wald/Komar machinery plus the on-shell equivalence of the auxiliary-field action CR2. The auxiliary fields ℓ_s and C are mathematical devices with no independent physical evidence; no parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Cano-Ruipérez action is a consistent truncation of the first-order α' heterotic string effective action compactified on T^6.
    Invoked in the introduction and throughout as the starting point; relies on the derivation in Ref [1].
  • standard math Wald's formalism and the Iyer-Wald prescription give the correct black hole entropy and first law for higher-derivative theories.
    Used in Sections 4.4 and 6.1 to define the Noether-Wald charge and entropy; the paper follows Refs [7,8,9].
  • ad hoc to paper The extended action CR2 with ℓ_s promoted to a field and the Lagrange multiplier C is on-shell equivalent to CR and yields the same thermodynamics.
    Introduced in Section 2, Eq (2.1); the paper argues equations of motion coincide for constant ℓ_s, but the charge and entropy equivalence is assumed for the thermodynamic analysis.
  • domain assumption Stationary, asymptotically flat black holes have a bifurcate Killing horizon with a binormal n^{ab} that is covariantly constant on the bifurcation sphere, and a momentum map P_k satisfying ı_k dC + dP_k = 0.
    Required in Sections 4.3 and 5 to define the charges and evaluate them on the horizon; standard for stationary black hole solutions.
  • standard math The scalar 3-form currents J_m and J_n are invariant under the Killing vector, allowing the construction of closed 2-form charges Q_φ and Q_χ.
    Used in Section 5, Eqs (5.1)-(5.2); the invariance follows from the Killing condition and the momentum map equation.
  • domain assumption The α'-corrected Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions of Ref [1] are the correct first-order solutions of the CR theory.
    Used in Section 6.2 as testbeds; taken from Ref [1] and its slow-rotation expansion.
invented entities (2)
  • Promoted string length field ℓ_s(x) replacing constant α'
    purpose: To make α' a spacetime-dependent thermodynamic variable and restore dilaton shift symmetry in the CR2 action.
    Auxiliary field constrained on-shell to a constant by dℓ_s=0; no independent physical evidence.
  • Auxiliary 3-form Lagrange multiplier C
    purpose: Enforces dℓ_s=0 on-shell and contributes the Noether-Wald charge term that produces the ℓ_s chemical potential in the Smarr formula.
    Introduced in Eq (2.1); it is a gauge field with shift symmetry, not a physical particle or force; no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the thermodynamics of the black holes of the Cano-Ruip\'erez 4-dimensional string effective action." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/76YICLC4

@misc{pith2026241110417,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the thermodynamics of the black holes of the Cano-Ruip\'erez 4-dimensional string effective action},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/76YICLC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10417}
}
abstract

The Cano-Ruip\'erez 4-dimensional string effective action is the simplest consistent truncation of the first-order in $\alpha'$ heterotic string effective action compactified on T$^{6}$. This theory contains, on top of the metric, a dilaton and an axion that couple to the Gauss-Bonnet term and to the Pontrjagin density which suggests a very strong relation between the physical and geometrical properties of its solutions. In this paper we study the thermodynamics of the string black-hole solutions of this theory using Wald's formalism. We construct the on-shell closed generalized Komar, dilaton and axion 2-form charges, and we used them to find the Smarr formula (that we test on the Schwarzschild and Kerr solutions) and to prove no-(primary)-hair theorems for the scalar. We find that $\alpha'$ plays the role of a thermodynamical variable with an associated chemical potential. We also notice the occurrence of non-standard gravitational charges in the Wald entropy and scalar charges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    String gravity in D= 4,

    P . A. Cano and A. Ruipérez, “String gravity in D= 4,” Phys. Rev . D 105 (2022) no.4, 044022 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044022 [arXiv:2111.04750 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    The Quartic Effective Actio n of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry ,

    E. A. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, “The Quartic Effective Actio n of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry ,” Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989), 439-468 DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90336-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90336-2 1989

  3. [3]

    Gravity and Strings

    T. Ortín, “Gravity and Strings”, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Covariant gener alized conserved charges of General Relativity ,

    C. Gómez-Fayrén, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, “Covariant gener alized conserved charges of General Relativity ,” JHEP 09 (2023), 174 DOI:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)174 [arXiv:2307.04041 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Extreme and Intermediate-Mas s Ratio Inspirals in Dynamical Chern-Simons Modified Gravity ,

    C. F. Sopuerta and N. Yunes, “Extreme and Intermediate-Mas s Ratio Inspirals in Dynamical Chern-Simons Modified Gravity ,” Phys. Rev . D 80 (2009), 064006 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.064006 [arXiv:0904.4501 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Topology , entropy and Witt en index of dilaton black holes,

    G. W. Gibbons and R. E. Kallosh, “Topology , entropy and Witt en index of dilaton black holes,” Phys. Rev . D 51 (1995), 2839-2862 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2839 [hep-th/9407118 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Local symmetries and constraints,

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald, “Local symmetries and constraints,” J . Math. Phys. 31 (1990), 725-743 DOI:10.1063/1.528801

    doi:10.1063/1.528801 1990

  8. [8]

    Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,

    R. M. Wald, “Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,” Phys . Rev . D 48 (1993) no.8, R3427. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3427 [gr-qc/9307038]

    arXiv 1993

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Some properties of Noether charge an d a pro- posal for dynamical black hole entropy ,

    V . Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of Noether charge an d a pro- posal for dynamical black hole entropy ,” Phys. Rev . D 50 (1994), 846-864 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.846 [gr-qc/9403028 [gr-qc]]

    1994 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Komar Integrals in Higher (and Lower) Derivati ve Gravity ,

    D. Kastor, “Komar Integrals in Higher (and Lower) Derivati ve Gravity ,” Class. Quant. Grav . 25 (2008), 175007 DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/25/17/175007 [arXiv:0804.1832 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Smarr Formula and an Exte nded First Law for Lovelock Gravity ,

    D. Kastor, S. Ray and J. Traschen, “Smarr Formula and an Exte nded First Law for Lovelock Gravity ,” Class. Quant. Grav . 27 (2010), 235014 DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/27/23/235014 [arXiv:1005.5053 [hep-th]]. 26

    2010 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Smarr Formula for Lovelock Bla ck Holes: a Lagrangian approach,

    S. Liberati and C. Pacilio, “Smarr Formula for Lovelock Bla ck Holes: a Lagrangian approach,” Phys. Rev . D 93 (2016) no.8, 084044 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084044 [arXiv:1511.05446 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Komar integrals for theories of higher order in t he Riemann curvature and black-hole chemistry ,

    T. Ortín, “Komar integrals for theories of higher order in t he Riemann curvature and black-hole chemistry ,” JHEP 08 (2021), 023 DOI:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)023 [arXiv:2104.10717 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Komar integral and Smarr for- mula for axion-dilaton black holes versus S duality ,

    D. Mitsios, T. Ortín and D. Pereñiguez, “Komar integral and Smarr for- mula for axion-dilaton black holes versus S duality ,” JHEP 08 (2021), 019 DOI:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)019 [arXiv:2106.07495 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    First law of black hole thermodynamics and Smarr formula with a cosmological constant,

    K. Hajian, H. Öz¸ sahin and B. Tekin, “First law of black hole thermodynamics and Smarr formula with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev . D 104 (2021) no.4, 044024 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044024 [arXiv:2103.10983 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Black hole chemistry , the cos- mological constant and the embedding tensor,

    P . Meessen, D. Mitsios and T. Ortín, “Black hole chemistry , the cos- mological constant and the embedding tensor,” JHEP 12 (2022), 155 DOI:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)155 [arXiv:2203.13588 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    The first law of black hol e me- chanics in the Einstein-Maxwell theory revisited,

    Z. Elgood, P . Meessen and T. Ortín, “The first law of black hol e me- chanics in the Einstein-Maxwell theory revisited,” JHEP 09 (2020), 026 DOI:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)026 [arXiv:2006.02792 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The first law of het- erotic stringy black hole mechanics at zeroth order in α ′,

    Z. Elgood, D. Mitsios, T. Ortín and D. Pereñíguez, “The first law of het- erotic stringy black hole mechanics at zeroth order in α ′,” JHEP 07 (2021), 007 DOI:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)007 [arXiv:2012.13323 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The first law and Wald entropy for- mula of heterotic stringy black holes at first order in α ′,

    Z. Elgood, T. Ortín and D. Pereñiguez, “The first law and Wald entropy for- mula of heterotic stringy black holes at first order in α ′,” JHEP 05 (2021), 110 DOI:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)110 [arXiv:2012.14892 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Non-extrema l, α ’-corrected black holes in 5-dimensional heterotic superstring theory ,

    P . A. Cano, T. Ortín, A. Ruipérez and M. Zatti, “Non-extrema l, α ’-corrected black holes in 5-dimensional heterotic superstring theory ,” JHEP 12 (2022), 150 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)150 [arXiv:2210.01861 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    α ′ corrections to 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,

    M. Zatti, “ α ′ corrections to 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes,” JHEP 11 (2023), 185 DOI:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)185 [arXiv:2308.12879 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mass formula for Kerr black holes,

    L. Smarr, “Mass formula for Kerr black holes,” Phys. Rev . Le tt. 30 (1973), 71-73 [erratum: Phys. Rev . Lett. 30 (1973), 521-521] DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.71

    1973 doi

  15. [23]

    Covariant conservation laws in general relativ ity ,

    A. Komar, “Covariant conservation laws in general relativ ity ,” Phys. Rev . 113 (1959), 934-936 DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.113.934 27

    1959 doi

  16. [24]

    New formula- tions of D = 10 supersymmetry and D 8 - O8 domain walls,

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortín, D. Roest and A. Van Proe yen, “New formula- tions of D = 10 supersymmetry and D 8 - O8 domain walls,” Class. Quant. Grav . 18 (2001), 3359-3382 DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/18/17/303 [hep-th/0103233 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    On scalar charges and black hole thermodynamics,

    R. Ballesteros, C. Gómez-Fayrén, T. Ortín and M. Zatti, “On scalar charges and black hole thermodynamics,” JHEP 05 (2023), 158 DOI:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)158 [arXiv:2302.11630 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Black hole entropy and Lorentz- diffeomorphism Noether charge,

    T. Jacobson and A. Mohd, “Black hole entropy and Lorentz- diffeomorphism Noether charge,” Phys. Rev . D 92 (2015), 124010 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.124010 [arXiv:1507.01054 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A note on Lie-Lorentz derivatives,

    T. Ortín, “A note on Lie-Lorentz derivatives,” Class. Quan t. Grav .19 (2002), L143- L150 DOI:10.1088/0264-9381/19/15/101 [hep-th/0206159 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Moduli, scalar charge s, and the first law of black hole thermodynamics,

    G. W. Gibbons, R. Kallosh and B. Kol, “Moduli, scalar charge s, and the first law of black hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev . Lett. 77 (1996), 4992-4995 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4992 [hep-th/9607108 [hep-th]]

    1996 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Scalar charge of black holes in Einstein-Maxw ell-dilaton the- ory ,

    C. Pacilio, “Scalar charge of black holes in Einstein-Maxw ell-dilaton the- ory ,” Phys. Rev . D 98 (2018) no. 6, 064055 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.064055 [arXiv:1806.10238 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Generalized Symmet ries for Generalized Gravitons,

    V . Benedetti, P . Bueno and J. M. Magán, “Generalized Symmet ries for Generalized Gravitons,” Phys. Rev . Lett. 131 (2023) no. 11, 111603 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.111603 [arXiv:2305.13361 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Charges and topology i n linearised grav- ity ,

    C. Hull, M. L. Hutt and U. Lindström, “Charges and topology i n linearised grav- ity ,” JHEP 07 (2024), 097 DOI:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)097 [arXiv:2401.17361 [hep- th]]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gauge-invariant magn etic charges in linearised gravity ,

    C. Hull, M. L. Hutt and U. Lindström, “Gauge-invariant magn etic charges in linearised gravity ,” Class. Quant. Grav . 41 (2024) no. 19, 195012 DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/ad718a [arXiv:2405.08876 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Quantum hair on b lack holes,

    S. R. Coleman, J. Preskill and F. Wilczek, “Quantum hair on b lack holes,” Nucl. Phys. B 378 (1992), 175-246 DOI:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90008-Y [hep-th/9201059 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Hairy black holes, scalar cha rges and ex- tended thermodynamics,

    R. Ballesteros and T. Ortín, “Hairy black holes, scalar cha rges and ex- tended thermodynamics,” Class. Quant. Grav . 41 (2024) no. 5, 055007 DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/ad210a [arXiv:2308.04994 [gr-qc]]. 28

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.