Fabrication of Hierarchical Sapphire Nanostructures using Ultrafast Laser Induced Morphology Change

Chih-Hao Chang; Joshua Cheung; Kun-Chieh Chien; Li Shi; Peter Sokalski

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 5 references

Fabrication of Hierarchical Sapphire Nanostructures using Ultrafast Laser Induced Morphology Change

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Above a threshold pulse intensity near 640 TW/cm², ultrafast laser pulses convert c-plane sapphire into a form that etches selectively in HF, and the $E_g/A_{1g}$ Raman peak ratio predicts which spots will etch before the acid is applied.

desk verdict Solid process study with a plausible threshold effect; the Raman 'predictive measure' is the weakest link because it is an uncalibrated proxy, but the fabrication demonstration itself holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11817 v1 pith:HKQJE5UY submitted 2024-11-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Joshua Cheung , Kun-Chieh Chien , Peter Sokalski , Li Shi , Chih-Hao Chang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 81.16.-c81.65.Cf78.30.-j

keywords sapphirenanostructuresultrafastlaserfemtosecondselectiveetchingRamanspectroscopymorphologychangehydrophobicityopticaldiffuser

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultrafast laser irradiation of c-plane sapphire, the standard wafer orientation, is argued to have a sharp threshold: below a peak pulse intensity of roughly 640 TW/cm² nothing changes in a way that matters, and above it the crystal is converted to an amorphous or polycrystalline form that etches selectively in hydrofluoric acid. The paper claims that the ratio of the $E_g$ Raman peak at 382 cm⁻¹ to the $A_{1g}$ peak at 420 cm⁻¹ measures this morphology change, with pristine sapphire giving 0.03 and heavily irradiated sapphire 0.22, and that this ratio can predict whether an irradiated spot will etch before the etch is performed. If true, this turns sapphire, one of the hardest materials to pattern, into a maskless direct-write substrate for hierarchical nanostructures. The demonstration is a 3.5 mm by 3.5 mm patch whose silane-coated surface reaches a 140° water contact angle with rose-petal-like adhesion and whose total transmission stays at 98.2% of the substrate while diffuse transmission peaks at 81.8%.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the self-normalized Raman metric: the intensity ratio of the $E_g$ vibrational mode at 382 cm⁻¹ to the $A_{1g}$ mode at 420 cm⁻¹. Absolute Raman intensities cannot be compared spot to spot because topography changes light scattering, so the ratio is used to gauge the degree of crystallinity, with a lower ratio read as more crystalline and a higher ratio as more amorphous or polycrystalline, since the mode intensities respond to the loss of the original c-plane orientation. The companion metric is the etch area ratio $A_{\mathrm{ratio}}=(A_f-A_i)/A_i$ measured by laser confocal microscopy before and after the HF etch, which quantifies the selective removal that the Raman ratio is claimed to predict. Together the two metrics convert system-specific laser parameters, intensity and pulse count, into a morphology state that can be read out optically.

What would settle it

Measure the same matrix of irradiated spots with transmission electron microscopy or X-ray diffraction and compare the independently measured amorphous or polycrystalline fraction against the $E_g/A_{1g}$ ratio; if spots below 640 TW/cm² show an elevated ratio but no amorphous fraction, or if rotating the Raman excitation polarization by 90° changes the ratio without any change in the HF etch outcome, the metric is not a crystallinity proxy and the predictive claim would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that femtosecond pulses at 790 nm with 50 fs duration alter the crystalline state of c-plane sapphire, and that this morphology change, not the ablation crater, is what makes the irradiated region removable in 49% HF. The conversion has a sharp onset around 640 TW/cm² and saturates above it, so the relation between morphology and etch behavior is essentially binary: spots below the threshold show no measurable selective etching, spots above it are removed, and pulse count over the tested 10 to 50 range makes little difference. As evidence, the authors report that the $E_g/A_{1g}$ Raman intensity ratio rises from 0.03 on pristine sapphire to 0.22 at 2560 TW/cm² and 50 pulses, that the ratio returns to crystalline values within about 5 µm at the spot edge, and that the etch area ratio correlates with the Raman ratio in a two-phase pattern. They conclude that Raman shifts associated with different vibrational modes can be used as a predictive measure of selective etching, and they use the process to build hierarchical sapphire nanostructures with a 140° apparent contact angle and high roll-off angle, the rose petal effect, plus broadband diffuse transmittance up to 81.8% at 1354 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The argument's load-bearing premise is that the ratio of the 382 cm⁻¹ peak to the 420 cm⁻¹ peak in the Raman spectrum measures how much of the laser-irradiated sapphire has become amorphous or polycrystalline, rather than merely reflecting a change in crystal orientation relative to the laser polarization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Peak pulse intensity, not pulse count, is the control that matters in the tested range: below about 640 TW/cm² no selective etching occurs, so fabrication recipes can be set against a single intensity threshold.
The $E_g/A_{1g}$ Raman ratio can serve as an in-line, non-destructive screen: spots that will etch can be identified before the HF step, and the same ratio locates the sharp crystalline-to-amorphous boundary, about 5 µm wide, of each written feature.
Because the process is maskless and direct-write, arbitrary hierarchical patterns can be generated over wafer-scale areas, demonstrated here at 12.25 mm² with a 7 µm period and 5.7 µm structure height.
The resulting surfaces combine a high apparent contact angle of 140° with high contact-angle hysteresis, the rose petal effect, and act as broadband optical diffusers with peak diffuse transmittance of 81.8% and total transmission within 98.2% of the polished substrate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the ratio is a true crystallinity proxy, a natural generalization is that other transparent crystalline materials that amorphize under ultrafast irradiation could be monitored by the same self-normalized Raman ratio, giving a general in-line metrology for selective-etch fabrication.
The saturation of the etch response above threshold implies the process is naturally binary, so achieving gray-scale etch depths would likely require operating just above threshold or tuning etchant selectivity rather than increasing intensity.
The authors expect pulse count to matter below 10 pulses, so a testable extension is to map intensity and pulse count in that regime to see whether the threshold sharpens or moves toward a single-pulse onset.
The decisive check on the metric is structural: transmission electron microscopy or X-ray diffraction of the same spots would show whether the $E_g/A_{1g}$ ratio actually tracks the amorphous fraction, and the authors list TEM as future work.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a useful, honest process paper. The central observation — fs-laser irradiation above roughly 640 TW/cm2 turns c-plane sapphire into a form that etches selectively in HF — is well supported by the SEM and confocal data, and the macroscale 3.5 x 3.5 mm demonstration with rose-petal wetting and 81.8% diffuse transmittance is a real step beyond earlier selective-etching work. The Raman Eg/A1g ratio as a quick crystallinity metric is a reasonable idea, and the binary separation in Fig. 8(c) is suggestive.

What is genuinely new is the systematic mapping of intensity and pulse count to both Raman ratio and etch area ratio, and the use of that mapping to fabricate hierarchical structures over mm2 areas. That is a legitimate extension of Juodkazis 2006 and Butkutė 2022. The citation pattern is fine, and the authors are upfront about several limitations — coarse intensity increments, pulse-count saturation, and the need for TEM — which counts for something.

Soft spots, in order. First, the "predictive measure" claim is overdrawn. The Eg/A1g ratio is never calibrated against TEM or XRD; the paper itself says as much and lists TEM as future work. Because the ratio can respond to polarization, topography, and debris rather than amorphous fraction alone, the correlation in Fig. 8(c) may be a common-cause consequence of the same threshold. The stress-test note is right on this, though I would phrase it as "the mechanism-specific claim is not yet established" rather than "wrong." Second, there are no error bars or replicate counts anywhere — contact angles, Raman ratios, etch area ratios, and transmittances are single measurements. For a process study this is a minor-to-moderate issue; it limits quantitative weight but does not break the qualitative threshold claim. Third, the confocal threshold height for the etch area ratio is manually chosen; the SI sensitivity check is good but the metric is still somewhat arbitrary. Fourth, the intensity grid is coarse (factor-of-2 steps), so the threshold is bracketed, not resolved — the authors own this in the Discussion.

This paper is for anyone working on laser processing of transparent ceramics or sapphire nanofabrication. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it out; ask for replicate data on the key quantitative claims and either a TEM/XRD calibration of the Raman ratio or a softened statement of the predictive claim.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a maskless fabrication route for hierarchical sapphire nanostructures based on ultrafast laser irradiation followed by selective wet etching in HF. A matrix of irradiation spots with varied pulse intensity (160–2560 TW/cm2) and pulse count (10–50) is characterized before and after etching using SEM, confocal microscopy, and micro-Raman spectroscopy. The authors identify a threshold intensity of roughly 640 TW/cm2 above which the Raman Eg/A1g peak ratio (382 cm-1 / 420 cm-1) increases and selective etching occurs, as quantified by an etch area ratio. They demonstrate a macroscale (3.5 mm x 3.5 mm) nanostructured area with a silane coating that exhibits a 140-degree apparent water contact angle and high roll-off angle (rose petal effect), and diffuse transmittance up to 81.8% with low total transmission loss. The central claims are that a threshold laser pulse intensity is required for selective etching and that the Raman Eg/A1g ratio can serve as a predictive measure of selective etching.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work offers a potentially simple, maskless process for patterning sapphire with hierarchical roughness, which is relevant for photonics, protective windows, and surface functionalization. The paper's strengths include a systematic parameter matrix with direct comparison of Raman spectra and etch outcomes on the same spots, a macroscale demonstration with both wetting and optical characterization, and an explicit discussion of limitations and future work. The authors also provide supplementary raw data (SEM, confocal height maps, Raman spectra) for a subset of spots, which supports reproducibility. However, the 'predictive measure' claim currently rests on an uncalibrated assumption about the Raman ratio, and key quantitative metrics lack error bars and replicate counts. These issues are addressable but are load-bearing for the paper's main conceptual contribution.

major comments (3)

[Section 4, 'Morphology change of the crystalline sapphire...' and Fig. 8(c)] The claim that the Eg/A1g Raman ratio is a 'predictive measure of selective etching' rests on the assumption that this ratio quantitatively tracks the amorphous/polycrystalline fraction. The paper itself states that 'direct comparisons of Raman intensities cannot be made accurately' due to topography-induced scattering, and the ratio is introduced to mitigate that effect. However, no independent structural verification (TEM, XRD, or electron diffraction) is provided to show that the ratio correlates with amorphous/polycrystalline fraction rather than with crystal orientation, surface roughness, or ablation debris; the authors list TEM and electron beam diffraction as future work in Section 5. Since the etching selectivity depends on morphology, not directly on the Raman polarization response, the correlation in Fig. 8(c) could be a common-cause association with the ablation/etching threshold rather than evidence of predictive power. Please provide independent structural calibration, or substantially temper the predictive claim to a correlational one.
[Section 3, Eq. (2), and Supporting Information B] The etch area ratio Aratio is defined using a threshold height for pixel selection, and Supporting Information B shows that the threshold is chosen to maximize spot pixels without including planar substrate. This makes Aratio sensitive to the chosen threshold; the authors demonstrate that a 12 nm threshold change adds many planar pixels. Yet no error bars, replicate counts, or sensitivity analysis are reported for Aratio (or for the Raman ratios, contact angles, and transmittances). Without replicates, the binary separation in Fig. 8(c) and the threshold claim in Fig. 7(d) cannot be distinguished from measurement noise. Please report replicate measurements and error bars for all quantitative claims, and include a sensitivity analysis of Aratio to the threshold height.
[Section 4, Figs. 4(c), 5(d), and 8(a)] The existence of a sharp threshold intensity near 640 TW/cm2 is supported only by a single coarse intensity step between 320 and 640 TW/cm2. Because the Raman ratio, the etch area ratio, and the ablation holes all appear at this same step, the threshold could reflect the ablation threshold rather than a distinct morphology-change threshold, and the correlation in Fig. 8(c) may be driven by this common cause rather than by a morphology-etching relationship. The authors acknowledge in Section 5 that finer intensity steps are needed, but the central threshold claim in the abstract and conclusion currently rests on this coarse sampling. Additional measurements between 320 and 640 TW/cm2 are needed to substantiate the threshold and to distinguish morphology change from ablation.

minor comments (6)

[Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is typeset incorrectly (the formula appears as a string with arithmetic symbols); please replace it with a properly formatted expression for peak intensity, including definitions of all symbols.
[Eq. (2) and Supporting Information B] Equation (2) as printed is garbled and should read Aratio = (Af - Ai)/Ai, with Ai defined as the pre-etch area and Af as the post-etch area; the numerical example in Supporting Information B is consistent with that expression but the main-text equation should be corrected.
[Fig. 4] The Raman spectra in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) appear to use different line styles or colors, but the caption does not define them; please add a legend or explicitly state how intensity and pulse count are encoded.
[Section 3, 'Experimental methodology'] The text says pulse intensity is controlled by altering the nominal power, while Eq. (1) uses average power measured by a power meter; please clarify whether the reported intensities are based on measured power or on nominal setpoints, and report the uncertainty in the intensity values.
[References] Reference 31 (Du et al., 'Biological sensors based on long period fiber grating') appears unrelated to the statement about ultrafast laser ablation of sapphire; please verify and replace with a relevant citation.
[Section 5, 'Discussion and future work'] The sentence 'The data also indicates the lack of any strong trends between pulse count and selective etching' should be 'The data also indicate...' for subject-verb agreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Raman-to-etching correlation is an empirical association between independently measured quantities, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is empirical rather than derivational. The Eg/A1g Raman ratio (Fig. 4c) and the etch area ratio A_ratio (Eq. 2, Fig. 7d and Fig. 8) are measured independently on the same irradiation matrix: the Raman ratio is obtained from micro-Raman spectra before etching, while the etch area ratio is obtained from laser confocal profiles before and after HF etching. Both quantities respond to the same laser-intensity axis, which can produce a common-cause association, but neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The 'predictive measure' statement is a correlation claim based on the observed binary separation in Fig. 8(c), not a definitional identity or a self-citation-forced conclusion. The assignment of the 382 cm-1 and 420 cm-1 modes to Eg and A1g, and the interpretation that changes in their ratio indicate loss of single-crystal orientation, are supported by an external prior result (Porto & Krishnan, ref. 48), not by a chain of the authors' own citations. The self-citations present (refs. 14, 26, 27, 28) are contextual background on nanotextured silica and sapphire nanofabrication and are not load-bearing for the morphology-etching claim. The lack of TEM or electron diffraction is a legitimate construct-validity limitation -- the Raman ratio is assumed, not independently calibrated, to track amorphous/polycrystalline fraction -- but that is a weakness in empirical support, not circularity. No equation or fitted quantity reduces to the claimed result by construction, so the paper is self-contained with respect to the circularity concerns defined here.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several external assumptions from the sapphire laser-processing literature (morphology change, HF selectivity, Raman interpretation) and on analysis choices made by the authors (threshold intensity boundary, confocal threshold height, demonstration scan parameters). No new physical entities are postulated. The Raman ratio assumption is the most consequential because it is the bridge between the measured spectra and the claimed morphology state.

free parameters (3)

Threshold peak intensity for morphology change and selective etching = ~640 TW/cm2 (between 320 and 640 TW/cm2)
Read off a coarse intensity grid (160 to 2560 TW/cm2) as the boundary below which selective etching does not occur; the authors state the grid increments are too coarse to identify the exact threshold.
Confocal threshold height for etch area ratio pixel selection = e.g., 16.06 um pre-etch and 21.81 um post-etch for the 2560 TW/cm2, 50 pulse spot
Chosen per spot to maximize pixels in the irradiated region without including the planar substrate; the etch area ratio is sensitive to this choice, as a 12 nm shift changes the selected pixels (Supporting Information B).
Macroscale demonstration scan parameters = 1,155 TW/cm2, ~9.33 average pulses, 7 um pitch
Hand-picked for the 3.5 mm x 3.5 mm functionalization sample; these parameters are not derived from the parameter matrix and are not optimized in the paper.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Ultrafast laser irradiation converts crystalline sapphire into amorphous or polycrystalline forms
Taken from prior literature (Juodkazis et al., ref 42) and used to interpret Raman changes; the paper does not directly verify the amorphous or polycrystalline structure with TEM or XRD.
domain assumption HF etches amorphous or polycrystalline sapphire much faster than crystalline sapphire, with selectivity up to 1:10^4
Cited from refs 43-45; the paper does not independently measure etch selectivity and instead uses this ratio to interpret the post-etch profiles and the binary etching behavior.
ad hoc to paper The Eg/A1g Raman peak intensity ratio is a monotonic proxy for the degree of crystallinity
Introduced in Section 4 as the central metric connecting laser parameters to morphology; no independent calibration against known amorphous fractions or structural characterization is provided.
domain assumption The Wenzel equation, cos(theta*) = r cos(theta), applies to the hierarchical sapphire surface with measured roughness factor 2.34
Used in Section 4, Eq. 3, to predict a contact angle of about 130 degrees; the measured 140 degrees is attributed to nanoscale roughness not captured by confocal measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fabrication of Hierarchical Sapphire Nanostructures using Ultrafast Laser Induced Morphology Change." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKQJE5UY

@misc{pith2026241111817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fabrication of Hierarchical Sapphire Nanostructures using Ultrafast Laser Induced Morphology Change},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKQJE5UY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11817}
}

read the original abstract

Sapphire is an attractive material in photonic, optoelectronic, and transparent ceramic applications that stand to benefit from surface functionalization effects stemming from micro/nanostructures. Here we investigate the use of ultrafast lasers for fabricating nanostructures in sapphire by exploring the relationship between irradiation parameters, morphology change, and selective etching. In this approach an ultrafast laser pulse is focused on the sapphire substrate to change the crystalline morphology to amorphous or polycrystalline, which is characterized by examining different vibrational modes using Raman spectroscopy. The irradiated regions are then removed using a subsequent wet etch in hydrofluoric acid. Laser confocal measurements conducted before and after the etching process quantify the degree of selective etching. The results indicate that a threshold laser pulse intensity is required for selective etching to occur. This process can be used to fabricate hierarchical sapphire nanostructures over large areas with enhanced hydrophobicity, which exhibits an apparent contact angle of 140 degrees and a high roll-off angle that are characteristic of the rose petal effect. Additionally, the fabricated structures have high broadband diffuse transmittance of up to 81.8% with low loss, which can find applications in optical diffusers. Our findings provide new insights into the interplay between the light-matter interactions, where Raman shifts associated with different vibrational modes can be used as a predictive measure of selective etching. These results advance the development of sapphire nanostructure fabrication, which can find applications in infrared optics, protective windows, and consumer electronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11817 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Matrix of samples before and after wet etching via HF acid. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Comparison of Raman spectra between the crystalline substrate and an amorphous region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Micro-Raman measurements of the testing matrix. (a) Measured Raman spectra for spots with 160 TW/cm2 to 2560 TW/cm2 peak intensity and constant 20 pulses. (b) Raman spectra or spots with 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Micro-Raman measurements from along the transition from amorphous and polycrystalline to crystalline. (a) Micro-Raman spectra for each of the five locations across the boundary for the 1280 TW/cm2 pulse intensity and 50 pulse spot. (b) Pre-etch SEM image of the irradia…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Top-View SEM of 1280 TW/cm2 and 50 pulses irradiated region before and after etch. (a) SEM image of the spot irradiated with 1280 TW/cm2 and 50 pulses before etching. Note the marks and rough surface present. (b) SEM image of the spot post etch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Selective etch results using confocal microscopy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Correlations between laser parameters and Raman spectra to selective etching. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Demonstration of hydrophobic effects induced by sapphire nanostructures created via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Optical transmittance properties of sapphire nanostructures created via ultrafast laser. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

5 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

Atomistic understanding of the variable nano-hardness of C-plane sapphire considering the crystal anisotropy,

Abstract Sapphire is an attractive material in photonic, optoelectronic, and transparent ceramic applications that stand to benefit from surface functionalization effects stemming from micro/nanostructures. Here we investigate the use of ultrafast lasers for fabricating nanostructures in sapphire by exploring the relationship between irradiation parameter...

work page 1901
[2]

Properties of Sapphire,

V. Pishchik, L. A. Lytvynov, and E. R. Dobrovinskaya, Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing, Applications. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-85695-7. 3. E. R. Dobrovinskaya, L. A. Lytvynov, and V. Pishchik, “Properties of Sapphire,” in Sapphire, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009, pp. 55–176. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-85695-7_2. 4. Y. Wang, X. Don...

work page arXiv 2009
[16]

Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structures,

E. Lee and K.-H. Lee, “Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structures,” Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4101, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22501-8. 17. A. R. Parker and C. R. Lawrence, “Water capture by a desert beetle,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6859, pp. 33–34, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1038/35102108. 18. A. Behera, D. K. Rajak, and ...

work page arXiv 2018
[28]

Increasing etching depth of sapphire nanostructures using multilayer etching mask,

Y.-A. Chen, I.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Chang, “Increasing etching depth of sapphire nanostructures using multilayer etching mask,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 061606, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1116/1.5119388. 29. Z.-C. Lin and Y.-C. Hsu, “A calculating method for the fewest cutting passes on sapphire substrate at a certain depth using...

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Femtosecond pulse laser ablation of sapphire in ambient air,

X. C. Wang, G. C. Lim, H. Y. Zheng, F. L. Ng, W. Liu, and S. J. Chua, “Femtosecond pulse laser ablation of sapphire in ambient air,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 228, no. 1–4, pp. 221–226, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.009. 41. O. Uteza et al., “Laser-induced damage threshold of sapphire in nanosecond, picosecond and femtosecond regimes,” Appl...

work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.009 2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Atomistic understanding of the variable nano-hardness of C-plane sapphire considering the crystal anisotropy,

Abstract Sapphire is an attractive material in photonic, optoelectronic, and transparent ceramic applications that stand to benefit from surface functionalization effects stemming from micro/nanostructures. Here we investigate the use of ultrafast lasers for fabricating nanostructures in sapphire by exploring the relationship between irradiation parameter...

work page 1901

[2] [2]

Properties of Sapphire,

V. Pishchik, L. A. Lytvynov, and E. R. Dobrovinskaya, Sapphire: Material, Manufacturing, Applications. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-85695-7. 3. E. R. Dobrovinskaya, L. A. Lytvynov, and V. Pishchik, “Properties of Sapphire,” in Sapphire, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009, pp. 55–176. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-85695-7_2. 4. Y. Wang, X. Don...

work page arXiv 2009

[3] [16]

Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structures,

E. Lee and K.-H. Lee, “Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structures,” Sci Rep, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4101, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22501-8. 17. A. R. Parker and C. R. Lawrence, “Water capture by a desert beetle,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6859, pp. 33–34, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1038/35102108. 18. A. Behera, D. K. Rajak, and ...

work page arXiv 2018

[4] [28]

Increasing etching depth of sapphire nanostructures using multilayer etching mask,

Y.-A. Chen, I.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Chang, “Increasing etching depth of sapphire nanostructures using multilayer etching mask,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 061606, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1116/1.5119388. 29. Z.-C. Lin and Y.-C. Hsu, “A calculating method for the fewest cutting passes on sapphire substrate at a certain depth using...

work page arXiv 2019

[5] [40]

Femtosecond pulse laser ablation of sapphire in ambient air,

X. C. Wang, G. C. Lim, H. Y. Zheng, F. L. Ng, W. Liu, and S. J. Chua, “Femtosecond pulse laser ablation of sapphire in ambient air,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 228, no. 1–4, pp. 221–226, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.009. 41. O. Uteza et al., “Laser-induced damage threshold of sapphire in nanosecond, picosecond and femtosecond regimes,” Appl...

work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.01.009 2004