Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Two-dimensional superconductivity in new niobium dichalcogenides-based bulk superlattices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two new bulk crystals, Ba0.75ClNbS2 and Ba0.75ClNbSe2, are intrinsic two-dimensional superconductors, and the selenide's in-plane upper critical field exceeds the Pauli limit.

desk verdict Solid new compounds with suggestive BKT data, but the 2D claim for Ba0.75ClNbS2 is undercut by a coherence length four times the interlayer spacing, and the Pauli-limit claim rests on an unparameterized fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12231 v1 pith:C6KEDTFC submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Kaibao Fan , Mengzhu Shi , Houpu Li , Ziji Xiang , Xianhui Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords two-dimensionalsuperconductivitybulksuperlatticestransitionmetaldichalcogenidesBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-ThoulessPauliparamagneticlimituppercriticalfieldspin-orbitcouplingBa0.75ClNbSe2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports two new bulk crystals, Ba0.75ClNbS2 and Ba0.75ClNbSe2, made of alternating monolayers of a niobium dichalcogenide and an insulating Ba0.75Cl spacer, and argues that both are intrinsic two-dimensional superconductors even though they are bulk materials. The evidence is a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition visible in both resistivity and current-voltage data, plus a large anisotropy of the upper critical field. The paper further claims that in the selenide the in-plane upper critical field exceeds the Pauli paramagnetic limit, an effect it attributes to spin-orbit coupling. If correct, the work demonstrates a generic chemical route to two-dimensional superconducting physics in bulk crystals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the superlattice architecture: alternating single layers of H-NbS2/H-NbSe2 with monolayer Ba0.75Cl spacers widens the interlayer separation to about 12 Å, versus roughly 5.7–6.3 Å in the parent dichalcogenides, which suppresses interlayer coupling and drives the electronic system into a two-dimensional regime. The argument for intrinsic 2D superconductivity rests on two standard signatures: the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition (the $V \propto I^\alpha$ law with $\alpha = 3$, and the Halperin-Nelson resistive form) and the large anisotropy of the upper critical field. The zero-temperature critical fields, and hence the Pauli-limit comparison, come from a two-band Gurevich model of $H_{c2}(T)$ that includes both orbital and Zeeman pair breaking.

What would settle it

Measure the in-plane upper critical field of Ba0.75ClNbSe2 at temperatures well below 0.4 K in a dilution refrigerator and compare the observed $H_{c2}^{\parallel ab}(T)$ with the two-band extrapolation; if the zero-temperature value falls at or below the Pauli limit $\mu_0H_p \approx 2.3$ T, the claimed violation is an artifact of the fitting procedure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that inserting a single Ba0.75Cl insulating monolayer between H-NbS2 or H-NbSe2 layers decouples the superconducting sheets enough that the bulk crystals behave as intrinsic two-dimensional superconductors. Both compounds become superconducting with $T_c \approx 1$ K and $1.25$ K, and both show a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, identified by a current-voltage power law $V \propto I^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha = 3$ at $T_{BKT}$, and by the characteristic resistive form. The upper critical field is strongly anisotropic, with zero-temperature anisotropy ratios $\gamma = H_{c2}^{\parallel ab}/H_{c2}^{\perp ab}$ estimated as $18.4$ and $37$ for the sulfide and selenide, respectively. In Ba0.75ClNbSe2, the extrapolated in-plane critical field of about $4.44$ T exceeds the Pauli limit $\mu_0H_p \approx 1.84 \times T_c \approx 2.3$ T, which the authors interpret as evidence for spin-orbit coupling (Ising- or Rashba-type) protecting the superconducting state.

Load-bearing premise

The central quantitative claim — that the in-plane upper critical field of Ba0.75ClNbSe2 exceeds the Pauli limit — rests on extrapolating $H_{c2}(T)$ to zero temperature with a two-band model fit to data measured only down to 0.4 K, using the 50% resistivity criterion; if the fit or the criterion is not right, the violation could shrink or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two new compounds are bulk, easily handled crystals in which two-dimensional superconducting phenomena (BKT physics, vortex dynamics, possible Ising pairing) can be studied without exfoliation.
  • The Ba0.75Cl spacer strategy generalizes to other transition metal dichalcogenides, giving a family of bulk superlattice superconductors with tunable $T_c$ and anisotropy.
  • If the Pauli-limit violation in the selenide holds, spin-orbit coupling in a bulk layered selenide protects superconductivity from in-plane fields, mirroring monolayer NbSe2 but in a three-dimensional crystal.
  • The large anisotropy ($\gamma \approx 37$) means the perpendicular coherence length is comparable to the interlayer spacing, implying possible dimensional crossover and vortex confinement for in-plane fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct angular-dependence measurement of $H_{c2}$ could test the two-dimensional Tinkham model prediction, independently confirming the 2D nature without relying on BKT analysis.
  • The same intercalation chemistry could be tried with TaS2 or TaSe2 to see whether the Pauli-limit violation and anisotropy track atomic spin-orbit strength systematically across the dichalcogenide family.
  • Specific-heat or scanning tunneling measurements could reveal whether the BKT transition is truly bulk or whether stacking disorder or surface layers contribute to the transport signature.
  • The two-band parameters reported in the supplemental material could be used to predict the temperature dependence of the London penetration depth, giving an independent testable signature of two-band two-dimensional superconductivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The authors report the synthesis and characterization of two new bulk superlattices, Ba0.75ClNbS2 and Ba0.75ClNbSe2, consisting of alternating monolayer H-NbS2/H-NbSe2 and Ba0.75Cl spacer layers. From resistivity, susceptibility, and Hall measurements they identify bulk type-II superconductivity with Tc ≈ 1 K and 1.25 K, respectively. They claim intrinsic two-dimensional superconductivity in both compounds based on a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition, inferred from V ∝ I^3 power-law behavior and the Halperin-Nelson resistivity form, and from a large upper-critical-field anisotropy (γ = 18.4 and 37). For Ba0.75ClNbSe2 they further claim that the in-plane upper critical field exceeds the Pauli limit. The zero-temperature Hc2 values and coherence lengths are obtained from two-band model fits and Ginzburg-Landau formulas. The central claims are the intrinsic 2D nature of superconductivity and the Pauli-limit violation in the selenide compound.

Significance. If correct, these compounds would constitute a valuable addition to the small family of bulk superlattice superconductors with two-dimensional character, and the selenide would provide another example of Pauli-limit violation in a bulk TMD-based system. The paper's strengths include the thorough structural characterization (HAADF, SC-XRD, pXRD, EDS), the demonstration of bulk superconductivity with nearly 100% shielding fraction, and the use of multiple complementary transport signatures for the BKT claim. The authors have also deposited crystallographic data with the CCDC, which is good practice. The principal weakness is that the coherence lengths derived in the same section partially contradict the intrinsic-2D interpretation, and the Pauli-limit claim rests on an extrapolated model fit rather than on directly measured low-temperature Hc2 data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, coherence lengths and Fig. 4] The zero-temperature coherence lengths obtained from the Ginzburg-Landau formulas in Sec. III are inconsistent with the central 'intrinsic 2D' claim for Ba0.75ClNbS2: with μ0Hc2⊥ab(0)=0.037 T and μ0Hc2∥ab(0)=0.68 T, the formulas give ξ_ab≈94.4 nm and ξ_c≈5.13 nm, while the interlayer spacing is d≈1.23 nm, i.e., ξ_c≈4.2d. For a genuinely decoupled 2D superconductor the in-plane orbital critical field would be of order Φ0/(2πξ_ab d)≈2.8 T, more than four times the reported 0.68 T; the observed low value indicates that the field suppresses superconductivity through interlayer orbital coupling, i.e., the S compound behaves as an anisotropic three-dimensional superconductor rather than an intrinsic two-dimensional one. The BKT signatures may reflect quasi-2D fluctuations in a weakly coupled stack rather than a true BKT transition. The authors should either restrict the 2D claim to Ba0.75ClNbSe2, where ξ_c≈1.42 nm is marginal, or provide a quantitative measure of the interlayer Josephson coupling showing that ξ_c is not the appropriate length scale.
  2. [Sec. III, two-band model and Pauli-limit claim] The Pauli-limit violation in Ba0.75ClNbSe2 (μ0Hc2∥ab(0)=4.44 T versus the Pauli limit μ0Hp≈1.84×Tc≈2.3 T) is a key quantitative claim, but it rests entirely on an extrapolation of the two-band model to T=0 and on the 50%-resistivity criterion. The data in Fig. 4(f) appear to extend only to T/Tc≈0.4, and the fitted curves are not accompanied by residuals or parameter uncertainties. The authors should show the data down to the lowest accessible temperature, report the fit parameters and their uncertainties from Table S3, test the sensitivity of Hc2(0) to the resistivity criterion (e.g., 10%, 50%, 90% of ρn), and compare with a single-band WHH fit. Without this, the value 4.44 T is an extrapolation and the conclusion that the Pauli limit is exceeded is not robust.
  3. [Sec. III, BKT analysis and Fig. 3] The BKT evidence should be quantified more carefully. The text reports TBKT from I-V as 0.99 K for Ba0.75ClNbS2 and 1.2 K for Ba0.75ClNbSe2, while the caption of Fig. 3 gives 1.02 K for the S compound and 1.02 K for the Se compound; the resistance-fit values are quoted as 1.02 K and 1.16 K. These inconsistencies need to be resolved with error bars and with the raw fits displayed. In addition, with Tc≈1 K the power-law exponent α(T) is extracted over a very narrow temperature interval; please state the voltage-noise floor, the current range used, and the exact procedure for obtaining α from the I-V curves, so that the reliability of the α=3 criterion can be assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental Methods] In the Experimental Methods section, 'high angel annular dark-field' should be 'high-angle annular dark-field'.
  2. [Sec. III, notation] The symbol d is used both for the interlayer spacing and in the differential dln(ρ)/dT; please use a different symbol, e.g., s, for the interlayer spacing to avoid confusion.
  3. [Sec. III, two-band model equation] The two-band model equation is ambiguous: the definition of h should read h = Hc2 D1 / (2 λ0 T) with explicit parentheses, and the parameters D0, D1, D2, α, and λ0 should all be defined at the point of use rather than in the subsequent text.
  4. [Sec. III, Table S3 reference] The fit parameters are referred to as Table S3, but the manuscript does not show the table or the quality of the fit; please include the table in the main text or present a representative comparison of the fit to the data with residuals.
  5. [Sec. III, Fig. 4 caption] In Fig. 4, the multiplication factors for the plotted Hc2 data (×10 and ×2) are easy to miss; please state the scaling explicitly in the caption or use separate panels with natural scales.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's claims rest on measured transport and magnetization data, standard BKT/GL analyses, and independent fits; no load-bearing step reduces to its own input or to a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and experimental. The central claims—bulk type-II superconductivity with Tc near 1 K and 1.25 K, a BKT transition inferred from V ∝ I^α with α = 3 and from the Halperin-Nelson resistivity form, large upper-critical-field anisotropy, and Pauli-limit violation in Ba0.75ClNbSe2—are each established from measured resistivity, magnetization, and I-V data using standard externally benchmarked models (the two-band Gurevich model and anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau relations). The zero-temperature upper-critical-field values are extrapolated from fitting the same resistive Hc2(T) data, but the paper explicitly presents them as estimates from a model fit rather than as independent predictions; parameter fitting to obtain Hc2(0) is not circular reasoning on this paper's terms. The one self-citation with a present author overlap (ref. 29, on intercalated bulk NbSe2) is used only to support the general strategy of inserting insulating layers to weaken interlayer coupling, and it is not load-bearing for any new claim. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and the BKT signatures are two independent standard checks that agree with each other. The skeptic's coherence-length objection (xi_c exceeding the interlayer spacing for Ba0.75ClNbS2) is a substantive scientific challenge to the 2D interpretation, but it is a correctness or interpretation concern, not a circularity; the circularity axis does not penalize possibly overreaching interpretations absent a definitional reduction or a self-citation chain. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the honest verdict is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The quantitative claims rest on standard BKT, GL, and Pauli-limit formulas plus a two-band model whose parameters are fitted to the measured Hc2(T). The Pauli-limit-violation and anisotropy numbers inherit the uncertainty of that fit.

free parameters (2)
  • Two-band model fit parameters (D1, D2, lambda_11, lambda_22, lambda_12, lambda_21) = not in main text (Table S3)
    Six parameters fitted to the Hc2(T) data; they determine Hc2(0), the anisotropy gamma, and the Pauli-limit comparison.
  • BKT resistance fit constants (rho_0, b) = not reported
    Used in the Halperin-Nelson form rho = rho_0 exp[-b/(T-TBKT)^(1/2)] to extract TBKT from resistivity.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The BKT theory applies to the superconducting transition in these bulk superlattices, so an I-V exponent alpha = 3 and the Halperin-Nelson resistivity form mark the 2D transition.
    Used in Sec. III and Fig. 3 to conclude intrinsic 2D superconductivity; assumes weak interlayer coupling and negligible disorder or pinning effects that could mimic BKT signatures.
  • domain assumption The two-band Gurevich model with negligible interband scattering describes the measured Hc2(T), including the zero-temperature extrapolation.
    Used in Sec. III and Fig. 4 to fit Hc2(T) and extract Hc2(0), anisotropy gamma, and the Pauli-limit comparison. The fit parameters are listed only in Table S3.
  • standard math The anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau relations Hc2_perp = Phi_0/(2 pi xi_ab^2) and Hc2_parallel = Phi_0/(2 pi xi_ab xi_perp) are valid for these materials.
    Used in Sec. III to compute coherence lengths xi_ab and xi_perp from the fitted Hc2 values and to argue for a dimensional crossover in Ba0.75ClNbSe2.
  • domain assumption The upper critical field is adequately defined by the temperature at which resistivity reaches 50% of the normal-state value.
    Applied to all Hc2(T) points in Fig. 4; other criteria would shift the fitted Hc2(0) and could change whether the Pauli limit is exceeded.
  • standard math The Pauli paramagnetic limit is mu_0 Hp = 1.84 times Tc for a weak-coupling BCS superconductor.
    Used to compare with the fitted in-plane Hc2 in Fig. 4(f); the 1.84 coefficient assumes a g-factor of 2 and weak coupling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional superconductivity in new niobium dichalcogenides-based bulk superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C6KEDTFC

@misc{pith2026241112231,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional superconductivity in new niobium dichalcogenides-based bulk superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C6KEDTFC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12231}
}
abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides exhibit many unexpected properties including two-dimensional (2D) superconductivity as the interlayer coupling being weakened upon either layer-number reduction or chemical intercalation. Here we report the realization of 2D superconductivity in the newly-synthesized niobium dichalcogenides-based bulk superlattices Ba$_{0.75}$ClNbS$_{2}$ and Ba$_{0.75}$ClNbSe$_{2}$, which consists of the alternating stacking of monolayer $H$-NbS$_{2}$ (or $H$-NbSe$_{2}$) and monolayer inorganic insulator spacer Ba$_{0.75}$Cl. Magnetic susceptibility and resistivity measurements show that both superlattices belong to type-II superconductor with $T_{c}$ of 1 K and 1.25 K, respectively. Intrinsic 2D superconductivity is confirmed for both compounds below a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition and a large anisotropy of the upper critical field. Furthermore, the upper critical field along $ab$ plane ($H_{c2}^{\parallel ab}$) exceeds the Pauli limit ($\mu_{0}H_{p}$) in Ba$_{0.75}$ClNbSe$_{2}$, highlighting the influence of spin-orbit interactions. Our results establish a generic method for realizing the 2D superconducting properties in bulk superlattice materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12231 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structure and composition of Ba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Resistivity and superconducting transition of Ba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The 2D superconductivity of Ba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (f), the Pauli limit is violated under the field ap￾plied parallel to the ab plane (i.e., µ0H ∥ab c2 > µ0Hp, where the µ0Hp ∼= 1.84 × Tc) in Ba0.75ClNbSe2. Moreover, the coherence lengths of both compounds are determined ac￾cording to the anisotropy Ginzburg-Landau (GL…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shalnikov, Superconducting Thin Films, Nature 142, 74 (1938)

    A. Shalnikov, Superconducting Thin Films, Nature 142, 74 (1938)

    work page 1938

  2. [2]

    D. B. Haviland, Y. Liu, and A. M. Goldman, Onset of su- perconductivity in the two-dimensional limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2180 (1989)

    work page 1989

  3. [3]

    Tinkham, Effect of fluxoid quantization on transitions of superconducting films, Phys

    M. Tinkham, Effect of fluxoid quantization on transitions of superconducting films, Phys. Rev. 129, 2413 (1963)

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    Saito, T

    Y. Saito, T. Nojima, and Y. Iwasa, Highly crystalline 2D superconductors, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16094 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Z. Li, L. Sang, P. Liu, Z. Yue, M. S. Fuhrer, Q. Xue, and X. Wang, Atomically Thin Superconductors, Small 17, 1904788 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Boix-Constant, S

    C. Boix-Constant, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, R. C´ ordoba, and E. Coronado, van der Waals heterostructures based on atomically thin superconductors, Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2000987 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Y. Xing, H. M. Zhang, H. L. Fu, H. W. Liu, Y. Sun, J. P. Peng, F. Wang, X. Lin, X. C. Ma, Q. K. Xue, J. Wang, and X. C. Xie, Quantum Griffiths singularity of superconductor-metal transition in Ga thin films, Science 350, 542 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    A. W. Tsen, B. Hunt, Y. D. Kim, Z. J. Yuan, S. Jia, R. J. Cava, J. Hone, P. Kim, C. R. Dean, and A. N. Pasupa- thy, Nature of the quantum metal in a two-dimensional crystalline superconductor, Nat. Phys. 12, 208 (2016)

    2016

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    J. M. Kosterlitz, and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two dimensional systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  2. [10]

    A. F. Hebard, and A. T. Fiory, Evidence for the Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition in Thin Super-conducting Aluminum Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 291 (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, and J. T. Ye, Evidence for two- dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2, Sci- ence 350, 1353 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Reyren, S

    N. Reyren, S. Thiel, A. D. Caviglia, L. F. Kourkoutis, G. Hammerl, C. Richter, C. W. Schneider, T. Kopp, A. S. R¨ uetschi, D. Jaccard, M. Gabay, D. A. Muller, J. M. Triscone, and J. Mannhart, Super-conducting Interfaces Between Insulating Oxides, Science 317, 1196 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Gariglio, M

    S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, J. Mannhart, and J.-M. Triscone, Interface superconductivity, Physica C 514, 189 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Saito, Y

    Y. Saito, Y. Kasahara, J. Ye, Y. Iwasa, and T. Nojima, Metallic ground state in an ion-gated two-dimensional superconductor, Science 350, 409 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Saito, Y

    Y. Saito, Y. Nakamura, M. S. Bahramy, Y. Kohama, J. Ye, Y. Kasahara, Y. Nakagawa, M. Onga, M. Tokunaga, T. Nojima, Y. Yanase, and Y. Iwasa, Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS2, Nat. Phys. 12, 144 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    D. Eom, S. Qin, M. Y. Chou, and C. K. Shih, Persis- tent Superconductivity in Ultrathin Pb Films: A Scan- ning Tunneling Spectroscopy Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 027005 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Jiang, T

    D. Jiang, T. Hu, L. X. You, Q. Li, A. Li, H. M. Wang, G. Mu, Z. Y. Chen, H. R. Zhang, G. H. Yu, J. Zhu, Q. J. Sun, C. T. Lin, H. Xiao, X. M. Xie, and M. H. Jiang, High- Tc superconductivity in ultra- thin Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x down to half-unit-cell thickness by protection with gra...

    2014

  10. [18]

    S. C. de la Barrera, M. R. Sinko, D. P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K. L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. W. Tsen, X. Xu, D. Xiao, and B. M. Hunt, Tuning Ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Commun....

    2018

  11. [19]

    Devarakonda, H

    A. Devarakonda, H. Inoue, S. Fang, C. Ozsoy- Keskinbora, T. Suzuki, M. Kriener, L. Fu, E. Kaxiras, D. C. Bell, and J. G. Checkelsky, Clean 2D superconduc- tivity in a bulk van der Waals superlattice, Science 370, 231 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Devarakonda, A

    A. Devarakonda, A. Chen, S. Fang, D. Graf, M. Kriener, A. J. Akey, D. C. Bell, T. Suzuki and J. G. Checkelsky, Evidence of striped electronic phases in a structurally modulated superlattice, Nature 631, 526 (2024). 8

    2024

  13. [21]

    G. Li, A. Luican, J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, A. H. Castro Neto, A. Reina, J. Kong, and E. Y. Andrei, Observation of Van Hove singularities in twisted graphene layers, Nat. Phys. 6, 109 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    T. S. Khaire, M. A. Khasawneh, W. P. Pratt, and N. O. Birge, Observation of spin-triplet super-conductivity in Co-based Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 137002 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Balents, C

    L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e flat bands, Nat. Phys. 16, 725 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    C. Jin, E. C. Regan, A. Yan, M. I. B. Utama, D. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Qin, S. Yang, Z. Zheng, S. Shi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Obser- vation of moir´ e excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices, Nature 567, 76 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    B. Zhao, D. Shen, Z. Zhang, P. Lu, M. Hossain, J. Li, B. Li, and X. Duan, 2D Metallic Transition–Metal Dichalco- genides: Structures, Synthesis, Properties, and Applica- tions, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105132 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    H. T. Wang, H. T. Yuan, S. S. Hong, Y. B. Li, and Y. Cui, Physical and chemical tuning of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2664 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    L. Du, T. Hasan, A. Castellanos-Gomez, G.-B. Liu, Y. Yao, C. Ning Lau, and Z. Sun, Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 193 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    H. X. Zhang, A. Rousuli, K. Zhang, L. Luo, C. Guo, X. Cong, Z. Lin, C. Bao, H. Zhang, S. Xu, R. Feng, S. Shen, K. Zhao, W. Yao, Y. Wu, S. Ji, X. Chen, P. Tan, Q.-K. Xue, Y. Xu, W. Duan, P. Yu, and S. Zhou, Tailored Ising superconductivity in intercalated bulk NbSe2, Nat. Phys....

    2022

  22. [30]

    X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe 2 atomic layers, Nat. Phys. 12, 139 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    R. Sun, J. Deng, X. Wu, M. Hao, K. Ma, Y. Ma, C. Zhao, D. Meng, X. Ji, and Y. Ding, High anisotropy in electrical and thermal conductivity through the design of aerogel-like superlattice (NaOH) 0.5NbSe2, Nat. Com- mun. 14, 6689 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Samuely, P

    P. Samuely, P. Szab´ o, J. Kaˇcmarˇc ´ ık, A. Meerschaut, L. Cario, A. G. M. Jansen, T. Cren, M. Kuzmiak, O. ˇSofranko, and T. Samuely, Extreme in-plane up- per critical magnetic fields of heavily doped quasi-two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 104,...

    2021

  25. [33]

    X. Yang, T. Yu, C. Xu, J. Wang, W. Hu, Z. Xu, T. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Ren, Z. A. Xu, M. Hirayama, R. Arita, and X. Lin, Anisotropic superconductivity in topo- logical crystalline metal Pb 1/3TaS2 with multiple Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035157 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Version 1.171.37.35, (Ag- ilent Technologies Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England, 2014)

    CrysAlisPro Software system. Version 1.171.37.35, (Ag- ilent Technologies Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England, 2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    L. J. Bourhis, O. V. Dolomanov, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, and H. Puschmann, Olex2: a complete struc- ture solution, refinement and analysis program, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 339 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX–Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 71, 3 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    G. M. Sheldrick, A short history of SHELX, Acta Crys- tallogr. A 64, 112 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    [19,39-43,49,50]

    See Supplemental Material at XX for a detailed struc- tural information, the results of resistivity anisotropy, magnetoresistance and Hall measurements and the fitting parameter of upper critical field, which includes Refs. [19,39-43,49,50]

  31. [39]

    Onabe, M

    K. Onabe, M. Naito, and S. Tanaka, Anisotropy of Upper Critical Field in Superconducting 2H-NbS2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 45, 50 (1978)

    1978

  32. [40]

    Naito and S

    M. Naito and S. Tanaka, Electrical Transport Properties in 2H-NbS 2, -NbSe 2, -TaS 2 and -TaSe 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 219 (1982)

    1982

  33. [41]

    R. Yan, G. Khalsa, B. T. Schaefer, A. Jarjour, S. Rou- vimov, K. C. Nowack, H. G. Xing, and D. Jena, Thick- ness dependence of superconductivity in ultrathin NbS 2, Appl. Phys. Express 12, 023008 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    B. W. Pfalzgraf and H. Speckels, The anisotropy of the upper critical field Hc2 and electrical resistivity in 2H- NbS2, J. Phys. C 20, 4359 (1987)

    1987

  35. [43]

    LeBlanc and A

    A. LeBlanc and A. Nader, Resistivity anisotropy and charge density wave in 2H-NbSe 2 and 2H-TaSe 2, Solid State Commun. 150, 1346 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Minnhagen, Kosterlitz-Thouless transition for a two- dimensional superconductor: Magnetic-field dependence from a Coulomb-gas analogy, Phys

    P. Minnhagen, Kosterlitz-Thouless transition for a two- dimensional superconductor: Magnetic-field dependence from a Coulomb-gas analogy, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5745 (1981)

    1981

  37. [45]

    Minnhagen, The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid super-conducting films, Rev

    P. Minnhagen, The two-dimensional coulomb gas, vortex unbinding, and superfluid super-conducting films, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1001 (1987)

    1987

  38. [46]

    B. I. Halperin and D. R. Nelson, Resistive transition in superconducting films, J. Low Temp. Phys. 36, 599 (1979)

    1979

  39. [47]

    Gurevich, Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconduc- tors, Phys

    A. Gurevich, Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B 67, 184515 (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    Jaroszynski, F

    J. Jaroszynski, F. Hunte, L. Balicas, Youn-jung Jo, I. Raiˇ cevi´ c, A. Gurevich, D. C. Larbalestier, F. F. Bal- akirev, L. Fang, P. Cheng, Y. Jia, and H. H. Wen, Up- per critical fields and thermally-activated transport of NdFeAsO0.7F0.3 single crystal, Phys. Rev. B 78, 174523 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    F. Soto, H. Berger, L. Cabo, C. Carballeira, J. Mosqueira, D. Pavuna, P. Toimil, and F. Vidal, Elec- tric and magnetic characterization of NbSe 2 single crys- tals: Anisotropic superconducting fluctuations above TC , Phys. C 460-462, 789 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    K. Ma, S. Jin, F. Meng, Q. Zhang, R. Sun, J. Deng, L. Chen, L. Gu, G. Li, and Z. Zhang, Two-dimensional su- perconductivity in a bulk superlattice van der Waals ma- terial Ba6Nb11Se28, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 044806 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper limit for critical field in hard su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  44. [52]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1, 7 (1962)

    1962

  45. [53]

    Y. Cao, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo Herrero, Pauli-limit violation and re-entrant superconductivity in moir´ e graphene, Nature 595, 526 (2021). 9

    2021

  46. [54]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publications, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover Publications, 2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, On Superconductivity and Superfluidity: A Scientific Autobiography (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    2009

  48. [56]

    Schneider and A

    T. Schneider and A. Schmidt, Dimensional crossover in the upper critical field of layered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5915 (1993)

    1993

  49. [57]

    R. V. Coleman, G. K. Eiserman, S. J. Hillenius, A. T. Mitchell, and J. L. Vicent, Dimensional crossover in the superconducting intercalated layer compound 2H-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B 27, 125 (1983)

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.