Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Atomic-scale Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-modified Yoshimori spirals in Fe double layer on Ir(110)

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two Fe layers on Ir(110) freeze into a chiral 1.27 nm spiral

desk verdict Clean SP-STM/DFT identification of a right-handed Néel spiral in Fe/Ir(110) with a Yoshimori-type origin; the single-q DFT ansatz is the main caveat, not a deal-breaker. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12642 v1 pith:KVJDWDOA submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Timo Knispel , Vasily Tseplyaev , Gustav Bihlmayer , Stefan Blügel , Thomas Michely , Jeison Fischer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall PACS 75.70.Ak75.70.Tj75.30.Et68.37.Ef
keywords spinspiralYoshimoriDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionfrustratedHeisenbergexchangeFe/Ir(110)spin-polarizedSTMdensityfunctionaltheoryNéelcycloid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that two atomic layers of iron grown on an unreconstructed Ir(110) surface have a magnetic ground state that is not ferromagnetic but a frozen, clockwise Néel-type cycloidal spin spiral with a wavelength of 1.27 nm. Combining spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy with density functional theory, the authors show that the spiral is incommensurate with the atomic lattice and remains unchanged in magnetic fields up to 9 T. The spiral is of the Yoshimori type: it is stabilized by frustrated Heisenberg exchange between competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic neighbor couplings, while the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction decides that the spiral is cycloidal and right-handed rather than Bloch-like. If correct, this makes fcc(110) surfaces a new platform for atomic-scale chiral spin textures whose anisotropy can be engineered.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Yoshimori spin spiral, a magnetic cycloid whose wavelength is controlled by frustrated Heisenberg exchange rather than by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. In this system the DMI acts as a symmetry-breaking selector that fixes the cycloidal (Néel) plane and the handedness without setting the length scale. The calculations use the generalized Bloch theorem in a p(1×1) cell for homogeneous flat spirals without spin-orbit coupling, and first-order perturbation theory to add the DMI contribution; the dispersion is mapped onto a classical Heisenberg model to extract exchange constants and onto micromagnetic coefficients A and D.

What would settle it

A DFT calculation that relaxes the single-q restriction and allows multi-q textures (large supercells or 2D spin spirals) would settle the ground state: if it found a skyrmion lattice or other multi-q state lower in energy than the homogeneous cycloid, the central claim would be wrong. Experimentally, detecting a spin component perpendicular to the spiral plane (along [001]) with an in-plane magnetized tip, or observing a field- or size-dependent change of the spiral period or handedness, would contradict the flat cycloidal Néel spiral.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetic ground state of a pseudomorphic double-layer Fe film on unreconstructed Ir(110) is a homogeneous, flat, clockwise Néel-type cycloidal spin spiral propagating along [1-10] with period 1.27 nm (4.69 atomic spacings), incommensurate with the crystal lattice. The spiral is of Yoshimori type: its energy scale and wavelength are set by frustration of Heisenberg exchange (ferromagnetic inter-plane nearest-neighbor coupling competing with antiferromagnetic intra-plane more-distant couplings), while the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, although five times weaker, selects the cycloidal plane and the unique right-handed rotational sense. Density functional theory without spin-orbit coupling yields a symmetric dispersion with two degenerate minima at ±q; including DMI breaks this degeneracy by ±2 meV and favors the positive q, matching the observed handedness. The calculated period of 1.39 nm agrees reasonably with the measured 1.27 nm. The authors further find strongly anisotropic exchange stiffness (A[110] = −19.8 meV versus A[001] = −0.1 meV) but nearly isotropic spiralization (D ≈ −5 meV/nm), and no significant higher-order (beyond-Heisenberg) interactions.

Load-bearing premise

The ground-state assignment rests on the restriction of the DFT search to homogeneous, flat, single-q cycloidal spin spirals in a p(1x1) cell; if a multi-q texture (e.g., a skyrmion lattice) stabilized by higher-order exchange had lower energy, the single-q spiral would not be the ground state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the frustration mechanism is generic, 2 ML Fe films on other fcc(110) heavy-metal substrates are expected to host atomic-scale spin spirals whose period and direction are set by the anisotropic exchange.
  • The computed 12 meV/Fe energy gain over the ferromagnet implies that unwinding the spiral into a skyrmion texture would require fields of order 80 T, consistent with the observed unchanged pattern up to 9 T.
  • The coexistence of strongly anisotropic exchange with nearly isotropic DMI provides a concrete materials platform for designing antiskyrmions or elliptical skyrmions, as proposed for low-symmetry surfaces.
  • The apparent absence of significant beyond-Heisenberg interactions makes this system a cleaner realization of the Yoshimori mechanism than Fe/Ir(111), where four-spin interactions dominate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the spiral is incommensurate with the lattice, its phase is not locked to atomic positions; one could in principle use step edges or defects to control the local spiral phase, a route to magnetic storage that the paper does not explore.
  • The single-q restriction leaves open the possibility that a multi-q state (e.g., a skyrmion lattice) is nearly degenerate; large-supercell DFT would clarify how robust the single-q ground state is.
  • If DMI is nearly isotropic while exchange is strongly anisotropic, then rotating the film or changing the stacking sequence should rotate the spiral direction without flipping its handedness, offering a tunable chiral-magnetism design knob.
  • The persistence of the spiral up to 9 T suggests the exchange-frustration energy scale is far above the Zeeman energy, so applying an in-plane field might nucleate metastable skyrmions or other textures; this is a testable extension of the paper's claims.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined spin-polarized STM and ab initio DFT study of two monolayers of Fe on a metastable, unreconstructed Ir(110)-(1x1) surface. The experiments reveal a single-q, clockwise (right-handed) Neel-type cycloidal spin spiral with wave vector along the close-packed [1-10] direction, a period of 1.27 nm, incommensurate with the atomic lattice, and unchanged in magnetic fields up to 9 T. The DFT calculations, performed with the FLEUR code in the LDA and with SOC treated in first-order perturbation theory, find a homogeneous cycloidal spin spiral with a period of 1.39 nm along the same direction and the same rotational sense. The authors interpret the spiral as a Yoshimori-type state driven by frustrated Heisenberg exchange, with the DMI selecting the cycloidal character and handedness, and they extract exchange constants and micromagnetic parameters to quantify the frustration and the DMI anisotropy.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper is a significant contribution to atomic-scale chiral magnetism on low-symmetry substrates. It provides a clear experimental realization of a DMI-modified Yoshimori spiral and demonstrates that open fcc(110) surfaces can host anisotropic exchange and DMI that stabilize new spin textures. The study is strengthened by the mutual consistency of experiment and parameter-free DFT: the measured and calculated periods agree to about 9%, the predicted and observed handedness agree, and the magnetic hardness up to 9 T is consistent with the large DFT energy scale of the spiral. The paper also gives useful micromagnetic parameters for this system. The main limitation is that the DFT ground-state search is restricted to homogeneous single-q spirals, which leaves the infinite-layer ground-state claim conditional on the absence of lower-energy multi-q states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical results; Discussion] The DFT total-energy search is restricted to homogeneous, single-q cycloidal spin spirals computed in a p(1x1) cell via the generalized Bloch theorem (Theoretical results; Fig. 4). The statement in the Discussion that 'no significant beyond-Heisenberg interactions were observed' is inferred from fitting this single-q dispersion to pair exchange constants (SM Note 3). A dispersion along high-symmetry single-q lines cannot exclude lower-energy multi-q textures stabilized by four-spin or three-site interactions, which are known to be important in the related Fe/Ir(111) and Rh/Fe/Ir(111) systems (Refs. 2, 8, 9). The STM observation of a single-q stripe in finite islands is strong experimental evidence for the realized state in those islands, but it does not by itself establish the infinite-layer ground state within the full spin-configuration space. Please either perform a multi-q comparison or explicitly qualify the ground-state claim as applying within the single-q homogeneous-spiral manifold.
  2. [Summary; Theoretical results] The Summary states that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction 'favor[s] a Neel over a Bloch spiral,' but the presented calculations only consider flat cycloidal (Neel-type) spirals; no Bloch-spiral dispersion or DMI energy is shown in Fig. 4 or the text. The experimental absence of an in-plane component perpendicular to the wave vector (Fig. 2(d),(g)) establishes the Neel character, but the DFT-based claim about the relative stability of Neel versus Bloch spirals is not directly demonstrated. Please either report the corresponding Bloch-spiral calculation or revise the wording to state that DMI selects the cycloidal orientation and handedness among the calculated spiral states.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains the typo 'frustated' and should read 'frustrated'.
  2. [Author affiliations] The affiliation 'R WTH-Aachen University' should be 'RWTH Aachen University'.
  3. [SM Note 3] The notation 'E[001] - E[110] = 1.18 meV/Fe and E[110] - E[110] = 0.32 meV/Fe' is ambiguous; please define which states are being compared, for example the energy minima for propagation along [001] and [1-10].
  4. [Abstract; Experimental results] The abstract describes the spiral as 'right-handed' while the experimental section describes it as 'clockwise'; please define the handedness convention explicitly (for example, the sense of rotation when looking along the propagation direction) so the two terms are unambiguous and consistent.
  5. [Discussion] The estimate that a field of about 80 T would unwind the spiral should be presented as an order-of-magnitude energy-scale argument rather than a quantitative prediction, since the unwinding path and the role of magnetic anisotropy are not analyzed in detail.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ground-state spiral is produced by parameter-free DFT and independently confirmed by SP-STM; the Heisenberg fit is interpretive, not a load-bearing prediction.

full rationale

The central claim—a clockwise Néel-type cycloidal spin spiral along [110] with wavelength 1.27 nm—rests on two independent inputs. DFT in the FLEUR code evaluates spin-spiral energy dispersions directly via the generalized Bloch theorem and LDA, with no parameter fitted to the experimental spiral; the energy minima at q=0.194(2π/a) and the chirality-lifting effect of SOC are raw outputs. SP-STM independently determines the wave-vector direction, wavelength, spin components, and handedness. The Heisenberg exchange constants in SM Note 3 are obtained by fitting the same scalar-relativistic DFT dispersion and then used to interpret the spiral as frustration-driven; this is a post-hoc mechanistic description, not a separate prediction that feeds back into the DFT energy. The restriction to homogeneous, flat, single-q spirals is an explicitly disclosed search-space assumption ('calculations of homogeneous spin spirals have been performed in the p(1x1) unit cell'), not a circular reduction: it limits the class of states considered but does not make the computed E(q) equal to its input by construction. Method citations (FLEUR, generalized Bloch theorem, first-order SOC perturbation theory) are standard code and methodology references and are not used to justify the specific physical result. The absence of observed beyond-Heisenberg interactions is an inference from the single-q fit and would require multi-q calculations to be fully certified, but that is a completeness limitation rather than a circular argument. No load-bearing step reduces by definition or by forced fitting.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The main free parameters are the Heisenberg exchange constants and micromagnetic coefficients fitted to the DFT spin-spiral dispersion; they are used to interpret the origin of the spiral but are not fitted to experiment. The DFT calculation itself is parameter-free apart from the LDA functional and the structural model.

free parameters (6)
  • S^2 J_{01} (interplane nearest-neighbor exchange) = 51.75 meV
    Fitted in SM Note 3 to the DFT spin-spiral dispersion; FM sign contributes to frustration.
  • S^2 J_{02} (intraplane exchange) = -24.81 meV
    Fitted in SM Note 3; AFM sign competes with FM J01.
  • S^2 J_{03} (intraplane exchange) = -25.94 meV
    Fitted in SM Note 3; AFM sign competes with FM J01.
  • S^2 J_{06} (exchange) = -7.27 meV
    Fitted in SM Note 3; additional AFM contribution to the dispersion.
  • Spin stiffness A (micromagnetic) = A[110] = -19.8 meV, A[001] = -0.1 meV
    Obtained by fitting E(q) = A q^2 around q = 0 for the two directions; used to demonstrate strong exchange anisotropy.
  • Spiralization D = D[110] = -5.2 meV/nm, D[001] = -5.0 meV/nm
    Obtained by fitting E(q) = D q around q = 0; used to show near-isotropic DMI.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Generalized Bloch theorem allows spin-spiral energies to be computed in a chemical unit cell
    Used in Theoretical results to restrict the magnetic search to homogeneous single-q spirals; if the ground state is multi-q, this theorem-based search is incomplete.
  • domain assumption Spin-orbit coupling contribution to spirals can be treated in first-order perturbation theory
    Stated in Theoretical results with ref [42]; assumes the DMI is a small perturbation, yet the paper's handedness conclusion relies on the DMI sign and magnitude.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetic energy is described by a classical Heisenberg model with bilinear exchange up to sixth neighbors
    SM Note 3 fits the DFT dispersion to this model; the conclusion that no beyond-Heisenberg interactions are significant rests on this model choice.
  • domain assumption LDA exchange-correlation functional is accurate for the Fe/Ir(110) ground state
    Used for all DFT calculations; LDA is known to sometimes misorder magnetic states in transition-metal films.
  • domain assumption dI/dV signal is proportional to m_s · m_tip (spin-polarized tunneling)
    Used in Experimental results to interpret magnetic contrast; standard in SP-STM but can be affected by electronic structure effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atomic-scale Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-modified Yoshimori spirals in Fe double layer on Ir(110)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVJDWDOA

@misc{pith2026241112642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atomic-scale Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-modified Yoshimori spirals in Fe double layer on Ir(110)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVJDWDOA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12642}
}
abstract

Ultrathin magnetic films on heavy metal substrates with strong spin-orbit coupling provide versatile platforms for exploring novel spin textures. So far, structurally open fcc(110) substrates remain largely terra incognita. Here, we stabilize a metastable, unreconstructed Ir(110)-$(1 \times 1)$ surface supporting two layers of Fe. Combining spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy and ab initio calculations, we reveal a right-handed N\'eel-type spin spiral along the [$\overline{1}10$] crystallographic direction with a period of 1.27~nm as the magnetic ground state. Our analysis reveals this spiral is of the Yoshimori type, i.e., driven by frustrated Heisenberg interactions, with the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction determining its cycloidal nature and handedness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12642 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. 2 ML thick Fe islands on unreconstructed Ir(110)- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spin-polarized STM data obtained using a magnetically soft Fe-coated W tip with magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Stability of frustated spin spiral against high mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chiral magnetic or- der at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry,

    M. Bode, M. Heide, K. von Bergmann, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, G. Bihlmayer, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, S. Blügel, and R. Wiesendanger, “Chiral magnetic or- der at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry,” Nature 447, 190–193 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions,

    S.Heinze, K.vonBergmann, M.Menzel, J.Brede, A.Ku- betzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, “Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions,” Nat. Phys.7, 713 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Writing and Deleting Single Magnetic Skyrmions,

    N. Romming, C. Hanneken, M. Menzel, J. E. Bickel, B. Wolter, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, “Writing and Deleting Single Magnetic Skyrmions,” Science 341, 636 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Atomic-Scale Spin Spiral with a Unique Rotational Sense: Mn Monolayer on W(001),

    P. Ferriani, K. von Bergmann, E. Y. Vedmedenko, S. Heinze, M. Bode, M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, S. Blügel, and R. Wiesendanger, “Atomic-Scale Spin Spiral with a Unique Rotational Sense: Mn Monolayer on W(001),” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 027201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Conical spin-spiral state in an ultrathin film driven by higher-order spin interactions,

    Y. Yoshida, S. Schröder, P. Ferriani, D. Serrate, A. Ku- betzka, K. von Bergmann, S. Heinze, and R. Wiesendan- ger, “Conical spin-spiral state in an ultrathin film driven by higher-order spin interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 087205 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Information trans- fer by vector spin chirality in finite magnetic chains,

    M. Menzel, Y. Mokrousov, R. Wieser, J. E. Bickel, E. Vedmedenko, S. Blügel, S. Heinze, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, “Information trans- fer by vector spin chirality in finite magnetic chains,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 197204 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Stabilizing spin spirals and isolated skyrmions at low magnetic field exploiting vanishing magnetic anisotropy,

    M. Hervé, B. Dupé, R. Lopes, M. Böttcher, M. D. Martins, T. Balashov, L. Gerhard, J. Sinova, and W. Wulfhekel, “Stabilizing spin spirals and isolated skyrmions at low magnetic field exploiting vanishing magnetic anisotropy,” Nat. Commun.9, 1015 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Competition of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and Higher-Order Exchange In- teractions in Rh/Fe Atomic Bilayers on Ir(111),

    N. Romming, H. Pralow, A. Kubetzka, M. Hoffmann, S. von Malottki, S. Meyer, B. Dupé, R. Wiesendan- ger, K. von Bergmann, and S. Heinze, “Competition of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya and Higher-Order Exchange In- teractions in Rh/Fe Atomic Bilayers on Ir(111),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207201 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Magnetic Ground State Stabilized by Three- Site Interactions: Fe/Rh (111),

    A. Krönlein, M. Schmitt, M. Hoffmann, J. Kemmer, N. Seubert, M. Vogt, J. Küspert, M. Böhme, B. Alonazi, J. Kügel, H. A. Albrithen, M. Bode, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, “Magnetic Ground State Stabilized by Three- Site Interactions: Fe/Rh (111),” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 207202 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Discovery of Mag- netic Single- And Triple- q States in Mn/Re (0001),

    J. Spethmann, S. Meyer, K. von Bergmann, R. Wiesen- danger, S. Heinze, and A. Kubetzka, “Discovery of Mag- netic Single- And Triple- q States in Mn/Re (0001),” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 227203 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Skyrmionics gets hot,

    S. Krause and R. Wiesendanger, “Skyrmionics gets hot,” Nat. Mater. 15, 493–494 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabiliza- tion of small individual skyrmions at room temperature,

    C.Moreau-Luchaire, C.Moutafis, N.Reyren, J.Sampaio, C. A.F. Vaz, N. Van Horne, K. Bouzehouane, K. Garcia, C. Deranlot, P. Warnicke, P. Wohlhüter, J. M. George, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, V. Cros, and A. Fert, “Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabiliza- ti...

    2016

  5. [13]

    Nucleation, stability and current-induced mo- tion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures,

    J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, “Nucleation, stability and current-induced mo- tion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures,” Nat. Nanotech. 8, 839 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuro- morphic computing,

    K. M. Song, J.-S. Jeong, B. Pan, X. Zhang, J. Xia, S. Cha, T.-E. Park, K. Kim, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, J. Chang, Y. Zhou, W. Zhao, W. Kang, H. Ju, and S. Woo, “Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuro- morphic computing,” Nat. Electron.3, 148–155 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Chi- ral spintronics,

    S. H. Yang, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and S. Parkin, “Chi- ral spintronics,” Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 328 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Topological magnetic and ferroelectric sys- tems for reservoir computing,

    K. Everschor-Sitte, A. Majumdar, K. Wolk, and D. Meier, “Topological magnetic and ferroelectric sys- tems for reservoir computing,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 455–462 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Antiskyrmions stabilized at interfaces by anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions,

    M. Hoffmann, B. Zimmermann, G. P. Müller, D. Schürhoff, N. S. Kiselev, C. Melcher, and S. Blügel, “Antiskyrmions stabilized at interfaces by anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions,” Nat. Commun. 8, 308 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ultra- thin epitaxial Au / Co / W ( 110 ),

    L. Camosi, S. Rohart, O. Fruchart, S. Pizzini, M. Belmeguenai, Y. Roussigné, A. Stashkevich, S. M. Cherif, L. Ranno, M. De Santis, and J. Vogel, “Anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ultra- thin epitaxial Au / Co / W ( 110 ),” Phys. Rev. B , 214422 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Large anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac- tion in CoFeB(211)/Pt(110) films,

    C. Q. Liu, Y. B. Zhang, G. Z. Chai, and Y. Z. Wu, “Large anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac- tion in CoFeB(211)/Pt(110) films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 262410 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Stabilization and current-induced motion of antiskyrmion in the presence of anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction,

    S. Huang, C. Zhou, G. Chen, H. Shen, A. K. Schmid, K. Liu, and Y. Wu, “Stabilization and current-induced motion of antiskyrmion in the presence of anisotropic Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 144412 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Dynamics of an elliptical ferromagnetic skyrmion driven by the spin-orbit torque,

    J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Q.g Shao, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou, “Dynamics of an elliptical ferromagnetic skyrmion driven by the spin-orbit torque,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 022407 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Elliptical skyrmion moving along a track with- out transverse speed,

    C. Cheng, Z. Yan, J. Dong, Y. Liu, Z. Xia, L. Li, and X. Han, “Elliptical skyrmion moving along a track with- out transverse speed,” Phys. Rev. B104, 174409 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Skyrmion-Antiskyrmion Racetrack Memory in Rank- One DMI Materials,

    M. Hoffmann, G. P. Müller, C. Melcher, and S. Blügel, “Skyrmion-Antiskyrmion Racetrack Memory in Rank- One DMI Materials,” Front. Phys.9 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    New aspects on the Ir(110) reconstruction: Surface sta- bilization on mesoscopic scale via (331) facets,

    R. Koch, M. Borbonus, O. Haase, and K. H. Rieder, “New aspects on the Ir(110) reconstruction: Surface sta- bilization on mesoscopic scale via (331) facets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3416 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    Illuminating structural transformation of Ir(110): A high-temperature 6 scanning tunneling microscopy study,

    J. J. Schulz, M. Sturmat, and R. Koch, “Illuminating structural transformation of Ir(110): A high-temperature 6 scanning tunneling microscopy study,” Phys. Rev. B62, 15402 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Analysis of the Pt(110)-(1x2) surface recon- struction,

    H. Niehus, “Analysis of the Pt(110)-(1x2) surface recon- struction,” Surf. Sci.145, 407 (1984)

    1984

  19. [27]

    A scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the struc- ture of the Pt(110) and Au(110) surfaces,

    T. Gritsch, D. Coulman, R. J. Behm, and G. Ertl, “A scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the struc- ture of the Pt(110) and Au(110) surfaces,” Surf. Sci.257, 297 (1991)

    1991

  20. [28]

    Direct Determination of the Au(110) Reconstructed Surface by X-Ray Diffraction,

    I. K. Robinson, “Direct Determination of the Au(110) Reconstructed Surface by X-Ray Diffraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1145 (1983)

    1983

  21. [29]

    Deconstruction of the Au(110) − (1 × 2) surface,

    C. Höfner and J. W. Rabalais, “Deconstruction of the Au(110) − (1 × 2) surface,” Phys. Rev. B58, 9990–9997 (1998)

    1998

  22. [30]

    [24, 31–35], for additional experimental data and supporting theory

    See Supplemental Material at URL-will-be-inserted-by- publisher, which includes Refs. [24, 31–35], for additional experimental data and supporting theory

  23. [31]

    Stress- driven self-assembly on Ir(1 1 0): Stripes, droplets, and missing-row-type reconstructions,

    A. Ney, J. J. Schulz, M. Sturmat, and R. Koch, “Stress- driven self-assembly on Ir(1 1 0): Stripes, droplets, and missing-row-type reconstructions,” Surf. Sci. 519, 192 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Determination of the atomic arrangement of the unreconstructed Ir (110) surface by low-energy electron diffraction a,

    C. M. Chan, S. L. Cunningham, K. L. Luke, W. H. Wein- berg, and S. P. Withrow, “Determination of the atomic arrangement of the unreconstructed Ir (110) surface by low-energy electron diffraction a,” Surf. Sci. 78, 15–23 (1978)

    1978

  25. [33]

    Dy- namics of the reconstruction process Ir(100) 1×1→1×5,

    K. Heinz, G. Schmidt, L. Hammer, and K. Müller, “Dy- namics of the reconstruction process Ir(100) 1×1→1×5,” Phys. Rev. B32, 6214–6221 (1985)

    1985

  26. [34]

    Superparamagnetic response of Fe-coated W tips in spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy,

    S.-H. Phark, J. A. Fischer, M. Corbetta, D. Sander, and J. Kirschner, “Superparamagnetic response of Fe-coated W tips in spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 032407 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Atomic structure governed diversity of exchange-driven spin helices in Fe nanoislands: Experi- ment and theory,

    J. A. Fischer, L. M. Sandratskii, S.-H. Phark, D. Sander, and S. Parkin, “Atomic structure governed diversity of exchange-driven spin helices in Fe nanoislands: Experi- ment and theory,” Phys. Rev. B96, 140407 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Resolving Complex Atomic-Scale Spin Struc- turesbySpin-PolarizedScanningTunnelingMicroscopy,

    D. Wortmann, S. Heinze, Ph Kurz, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, “Resolving Complex Atomic-Scale Spin Struc- turesbySpin-PolarizedScanningTunnelingMicroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4132 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    Real-Space Ob- servation of a Right-Rotating Inhomogeneous Cycloidal Spin Spiral by Spin-Polarized Scanning Tunneling Mi- croscopy in a Triple Axes Vector Magnet,

    S. Meckler, N. Mikuszeit, A. Preßler, E. Y. Vedmedenko, O. Pietzsch, and R. Wiesendanger, “Real-Space Ob- servation of a Right-Rotating Inhomogeneous Cycloidal Spin Spiral by Spin-Polarized Scanning Tunneling Mi- croscopy in a Triple Axes Vector Magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, ...

    2009

  30. [38]

    Full-potential self-consistent linearized- augmented-plane-wave method for calculating the elec- tronic structure of molecules and surfaces:O2 molecule,

    E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, “Full-potential self-consistent linearized- augmented-plane-wave method for calculating the elec- tronic structure of molecules and surfaces:O2 molecule,” Phys. Rev. B24, 864–875 (1981)

    1981

  31. [39]

    Fleur, zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7576163 ,

    D. Wortmann, G. Michalicek, N. Baadji, M. Bet- zinger, G. Bihlmayer, J. Bröder, T. Burnus, J. Enko- vaara, F. Freimuth, C. Friedrich, C.-R. Gerhorst, S. Granberg Cauchi, U. Grytsiuk, A. Hanke, J.-P. Hanke, M. Heide, S. Heinze, R. Hilgers, H. Janssen, D. A. Klüp- pelberg, R. Ko...

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Accurate spin- dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis,

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, “Accurate spin- dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis,” Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200–1211 (1980)

    1980

  33. [41]

    Ab initio treatment of noncollinear magnets with the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method,

    Ph. Kurz, F. Förster, L. Nordström, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, “Ab initio treatment of noncollinear magnets with the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method,” Phys. Rev. B69, 024415 (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Describ- ing Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya spirals from first principles,

    M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, “Describ- ing Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya spirals from first principles,” Physica B: Condens. Matter404, 2678–2683 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Anewtypeofantiferromagneticstructure in the rutile type crystal,

    A.Yoshimori,“Anewtypeofantiferromagneticstructure in the rutile type crystal,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.14, 807–821 (1959)

    1959

  36. [44]

    Reduced- dimensionality-induced helimagnetism in iron nanois- lands,

    S. H. Phark, J. A. Fischer, M. Corbetta, D. Sander, K. Nakamura, and J. Kirschner, “Reduced- dimensionality-induced helimagnetism in iron nanois- lands,” Nat. Commun.5, 5183 (2014). Supplemental Material: Atomic-scale Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-modified Yoshimori spirals in Fe doub...

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    R. Koch, M. Borbonus, O. Haase, and K. H. Rieder, New aspects on the Ir(110) reconstruction: Surface stabilization on mesoscopic scale via (331) facets, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3416 (1991)

    1991

  38. [46]

    A. Ney, J. J. Schulz, M. Sturmat, and R. Koch, Stress-driven self-assembly on Ir(1 1 0): Stripes, droplets, and missing-row-type reconstructions, Surf. Sci.519, 192 (2002)

    2002

  39. [47]

    C. M. Chan, S. L. Cunningham, K. L. Luke, W. H. Weinberg, and S. P. Withrow, Determination of the atomic arrangement of the unreconstructed Ir (110) surface by low-energy electron diffraction a, Surf. Sci. 78, 15 (1978)

    1978

  40. [48]

    Heinz, G

    K. Heinz, G. Schmidt, L. Hammer, and K. Müller, Dynamics of the reconstruction process Ir(100) 1×1→1×5, Phys. Rev. B32, 6214 (1985)

    1985

  41. [49]

    Phark, J

    S.-H. Phark, J. A. Fischer, M. Corbetta, D. Sander, and J. Kirschner, Superparamagnetic response of Fe-coated W tips in spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 032407 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    J. A. Fischer, L. M. Sandratskii, S.-H. Phark, D. Sander, and S. Parkin, Atomic structure governed diversity of exchange-driven spin helices in Fe nanoislands: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. B96, 140407 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.