REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 59 references
Stacking-dependent ferroicity of reversed bilayer: altermagnetism or ferroelectricity
T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Reversed stacking yields altermagnetism or ferroelectricity.
desk verdict Solid DFT paper on reversed-stacked PtBr3 bilayers with a genuine internal contradiction about net magnetization in the AC' phase that must be fixed before the MOKE claim can be assessed. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the reversed bilayer: a second monolayer stacked after an $M_z$ mirror operation, which breaks space inversion. The analysis uses the spin layer group formalism, in which nonrelativistic spin and real-space symmetries are treated separately as pairs $[R_i\parallel R_j]$; this formalism decides whether a collinear antiferromagnet is ordinary, altermagnetic, or ferromagnetic-like. For AB' stacking the nontrivial spin layer group is identified as $1\bar{3}2m$, and the combined $[C_2\parallel G-H]$ operations protect spin degeneracy along high-symmetry lines while allowing spin splitting with alternating signs elsewhere. For AC' stacking the only real-space symmetry is a vertical mirror $m_y$, and the electrostatic potential difference between layers acts as the built-in field that induces the polarization-controlled spin splitting. The accompanying first-principles machinery, including DFT+U with $U_{\mathrm{eff}} = 1$ eV, Wannier interpolation, Berry curvature, and climbing-image nudged elastic band barriers, supplies the quantitative predictions for spin-splitting energies, polarization values, Hall conductances, and MOKE spectra.
What would settle it
Measure the band structure of an AB'-stacked PtBr3 bilayer with spin- and angle-resolved photoemission: the altermagnetic claim requires spin-up and spin-down bands to split with opposite signs along a generic path such as K–K2 while the system stays globally nonmagnetic, so any observation of a net magnetic moment, or of spin splitting without sign alternation, would falsify it. For the AC' stacking, switch the polarization by sliding and measure the magneto-optical Kerr rotation: the magnetoelectric claim requires the Kerr angle and ellipticity to reverse sign between the +P and −P states with zero applied magnetic field.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
In a PtBr3 bilayer constructed by mirror-reversing the top layer, the paper finds that the magnetic ground state remains A-type antiferromagnetic, but the stacking symmetry determines what ferroic property appears. For AB' stacking, the spin layer group $[E\parallel H]+[C_2\parallel G-H]$ allows only combined spin-and-space rotations that force the spin degeneracy to be lifted with alternating sign in momentum space, the hallmark of altermagnetism, while the net magnetization stays zero; DFT gives spin splitting up to 18 meV at the lowest conduction band and a Hall conductance whose sign reverses between the two enantiomeric stackings AB'1 and AB'2. For AC' stacking, interlayer sliding breaks inversion symmetry and creates a switchable electric polarization (2.4 pC/m out-of-plane, 9.7 pC/m in-plane) that acts like a built-in field, splitting the spin bands throughout the Brillouin zone and reversing them when polarization flips; Berry curvature becomes layer-locked, giving a layer-polarized anomalous Hall effect, and the Kerr angle and ellipticity reverse with polarization. The paper reads these results as evidence that reversed stacking lets one choose between altermagnetism and ferroelectricity in the same bilayer family.
Load-bearing premise
The predictions rest on the assumption that the nonrelativistic spin layer group classification applies to the calculated A-type antiferromagnetic state, i.e., spin and real space are decoupled; if spin-orbit coupling substantially mixes the spin channels, or if the true magnetic ground state is not the computed A-AFM order, the alternating spin splitting, crystal Hall effect, and the reversal signals would not survive.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- AB'-stacked bilayer PtBr3 is predicted to be a concrete two-dimensional altermagnet, detectable by spin-resolved ARPES and anomalous Hall measurements; the sign reversal between enantiomers gives chirality-controlled spin splitting.
- The reversed-stacking construction should generalize to other MX3 systems, such as MnBr3, making it a design principle rather than a single-material accident.
- AC' stacking combines antiferromagnetism with sliding ferroelectricity, enabling electrical writing of polarization and magnetic reading via MOKE without net magnetization.
- Polarization reversal switches spin splitting and Berry curvature, giving a layer-polarized anomalous Hall effect that can serve as a readout of the ferroelectric state.
Reading between the lines
- If reversed stacking works broadly, stacking order becomes a binary degree of freedom for altermagnetism, and local stacking domains in moiré or heterobilayer systems could act as nanometer-scale altermagnetic or ferroelectric regions.
- The low polarization-switching barrier (18 meV/f.u.) hints that thermal sliding could flip the polarization spontaneously at finite temperature unless the structure is pinned, an effect experiments would need to quantify.
- The predicted MOKE signal without net magnetization could enable non-destructive memory readout, but the Kerr angles are small and the assumed SiO2 substrate response would need experimental verification.
- The spin layer group classification assumes spin and real space decouple; including spin-orbit coupling may add Rashba-like textures beyond the alternating altermagnetic splitting, which angle-resolved photoemission could separately test.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes reversed bilayer stacking, obtained by mirror-reflecting the top layer, as a general design principle for two-dimensional altermagnetism, and illustrates it with density-functional theory (DFT) and spin-layer-group analysis on bilayer PtBr3. For AB' stacking, the authors report altermagnetic spin-splitting with alternating momentum-dependent signs, chirality-reversible band structure, and a crystal Hall effect. For AC' stacking, they report sliding ferroelectricity with both in-plane and out-of-plane spontaneous polarization, polarization-controlled spin-splitting, and magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) detection of the magnetic state. The paper includes total-energy comparisons of several magnetic orders, band-structure calculations, and Berry-curvature/AHE calculations.
Significance. If the predictions are correct, the proposed reversed-stacking route would be a practical and general way to realize 2D altermagnets and magnetoelectric multiferroics, addressing the current scarcity of 2D altermagnetic materials. The paper's strength is its combination of symmetry classification (spin-layer groups) with first-principles calculations, yielding concrete, falsifiable predictions such as the spin-splitting magnitudes (5.5 meV and 18 meV) and the sign reversal of the Hall conductance upon chirality change. The use of established methods (DFT+U, Wannier functions, CI-NEB) is appropriate. However, the manuscript contains an internal contradiction regarding the net magnetization of the AC' stacking that directly affects the validity of the central claim of MOKE "even without net magnetization."
major comments (1)
- [Results and Discussion (paragraph on AC' stacking) and Abstract] The Abstract and Introduction state that the AC' stacking enables MOKE detection "even without net magnetization" and describe the system as antiferromagnetic, but the Results section states: "For AC' stacking, due to the existence of electric dipole and potential difference, the antiferromagnetic configuration produces an uncompensated non-zero total magnetic moment." These two statements are mutually exclusive. If the total moment is nonzero, the AC' phase is a ferrimagnet or weak ferromagnet rather than a compensated antiferromagnet, and the MOKE response could originate from the net moment rather than from the claimed magnetoelectric coupling of a zero-moment state. The spin-layer-group description of AC' as belonging to "nonzero magnetization phases" confirms that the authors themselves identify a net moment. This contradiction is load-bearing because the paper's novelty for AC' is explicitly framed around zero-net-magnetization multiferroic behavior. The authors must either demonstrate that the A-AFM state is actually compensated (and correct the text accordingly) or revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion, and reinterpret the MOKE calculation in light of the uncompensated moment.
minor comments (5)
- [Methods] The Hubbard Ueff is set to 1 eV on Pt 5d, but the sensitivity of the magnetic ground state and spin-splitting to this value is not discussed; a brief convergence statement would improve confidence.
- [Results and Discussion (AB' stacking) and Methods] The crystal Hall effect for AB' stacking should state explicitly whether spin-orbit coupling was included in the Berry-curvature and Hall-conductance calculation, since the anomalous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets generally requires SOC.
- [Results and Discussion (AB' stacking)] The notation for the spin layer group R3 = [E || H] + [C2 || G - H] is not explained in the text; please add a short definition or a more explicit reference to the notation used in Ref. [52].
- [Introduction] The statement that research on 2D altermagnets "remains elusive" should be qualified, since the Note added in proof and existing literature already report 2D altermagnet proposals.
- [Abstract] The phrase "This method could enable altermagnetism-type spin splitting to occur intrinsically" is vague; specify that the demonstration is for bilayer PtBr3 with AB' stacking.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the altermagnetic and ferroelectric predictions follow from symmetry analysis and direct DFT/Wannier calculations, not from fitted target quantities; the only self-citation is a non-load-bearing methodological reference.
full rationale
The paper's central claims — AB' stacking realizing altermagnetism with chirality-reversible spin-splitting and crystal Hall effect, and AC' stacking showing sliding ferroelectricity with polarization-controlled spin-splitting and MOKE response — are derived from spin-layer-group symmetry classification plus first-principles DFT, Wannier interpolation, and Berry-curvature/Hall-conductance calculations. The spin-splitting values (5.5 meV and 18 meV), polarization magnitudes (2.4 pC/m out-of-plane and 9.7 pC/m in-plane), energy barriers, Kerr angles, and Hall conductances are computed outputs, not inputs fitted from the target observables. The spin-layer-group formalism is cited from independent work [11,52], and the nonrelativistic assumption is stated explicitly rather than smuggled in. The one notable self-citation is Ref. [55] for MOKE methodology in ferroelectric antiferromagnetic heterostructures; it is used as a calculational reference, and the actual Kerr angle and ellipticity are computed from the Wannier-based optical response, so it is not load-bearing. The paper also contains an internal tension: the AC' section states the antiferromagnetic configuration produces an uncompensated nonzero total magnetic moment, while the abstract and introduction claim MOKE detection 'even without net magnetization.' This is a physical consistency/correctness concern, not a circularity of derivation, and it does not make the claimed symmetries or first-principles results reduce to their own inputs. Overall, no circular step of the kind defined in the rubric is present; the minor self-citation does not support the central derivation.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Hubbard Ueff on Pt 5d =
1 eV
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption Spin and real space decouple in the nonrelativistic limit, allowing spin layer group classification of the magnetic phase.
- domain assumption The spin layer group formalism of Refs. [11,52] correctly distinguishes altermagnetic from antiferromagnetic phases.
- domain assumption DFT+U with GGA-PBE and D3 dispersion accurately describes the ground state of PtBr3 bilayers.
- domain assumption The MOKE simulation for a supported bilayer is adequately described by a substrate refractive index n=1.546.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Stacking-dependent ferroicity of reversed bilayer: altermagnetism or ferroelectricity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MIB5EUMB
@misc{pith2026241113182,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Stacking-dependent ferroicity of reversed bilayer: altermagnetism or ferroelectricity},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MIB5EUMB}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13182}
}
abstract
Altermagnetism, as a new branch of magnetism independent of traditional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism, has attracted extensive attention recently. At present, researchers have proved several kinds of three-dimensional altermagnets, but research on two-dimensional (2D) altermagnets remains elusive. Here, we propose a method for designing altermagnetism in 2D lattices: bilayer reversed stacking. This method could enable altermagnetism-type spin splitting to occur intrinsically and the spin-splitting can be controlled by crystal chirality. We also demonstrate it through a real material of bilayer PtBr$_3$ with AB' stacking order. Additionally, the combination of stacking order and slidetronics offers new opportunities for electrical writing and magnetic reading of electronic devices. In the case of AC' stacking, interlayer sliding results in reversible spontaneous polarization. This unique combination of antiferromagnetism and sliding ferroelectricity leads to polarization-controlled spin-splitting, thus enabling magnetoelectric coupling, which can be detected by magneto-optical Kerr effect even without net magnetization. Our research highlights that reversed stacking provides a platform to explore rich physical properties of magnetism, ferroelectricity, and spin-splitting.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
T. Dietl and H. Ohno, Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: Physics and spintronic structures,Rev.Mod.Phys. 86,187(2014)
work page 2014
-
[2]
A. Hirohata, K. Yamada, Y. Nakatani, I.-L. Prejbeanu, B. Diény, P. Pirro, and B. Hillebrands,Reviewonspintronics:Principlesanddeviceapplications,J.Magn.Magn. Mater. 509,166711(2020)
work page 2020
-
[3]
T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat.Nanotechnol. 11,231(2016)
work page 2016
- [4]
-
[5]
Olejník et al., Terahertz electrical writing speed in an antiferromagnetic memory, Sci.Adv
K. Olejník et al., Terahertz electrical writing speed in an antiferromagnetic memory, Sci.Adv. 4,eaar3566(2018)
work page 2018
-
[6]
Yuan et al., Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field, Nat
H. Yuan et al., Zeeman-type spin splitting controlled by an electric field, Nat. Phys. 9, 563(2013)
work page 2013
-
[7]
Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,JETPLett. 39,78(1984)
work page 1984
-
[8]
F. G. Pikus and G. E. Pikus, Conduction-band spin splitting and negative magnetoresistanceinA3B5heterostructures,Phys.Rev.B 51,16928(1995)
work page 1995
Show all 59 references
-
[9]
Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys
G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev. 100, 580(1955)
1955
-
[10]
R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K. Q. Chen, and L. M. Tang, Nonrelativistic spin- momentum coupling in antiferromagnetic twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 046401(2023)
2023
-
[11]
Šmejkal, J
L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A Phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys.Rev.X 12,031042(2022)
2022
-
[12]
132, 036702(2024)
S.Leeetal.,BrokenKramersdegeneracyinaltermagneticMnTe,Phys.Rev.Lett. 132, 036702(2024)
2024
-
[13]
Bhowal and N
S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets,Phys.Rev.X 14,011019(2024)
2024
-
[14]
Šmejkal, J
L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism,Phys.Rev.X 12,040501(2022)
2022
-
[15]
X. Zhou, W. Feng, R. W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, CrystalthermaltransportinaltermagneticRuO2,Phys.Rev.Lett. 132,056701(2024)
2024
-
[16]
J.Krempaskýetal.,AltermagneticliftingofKramersspindegeneracy,Nature 626,517 (2024)
2024
-
[17]
I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118,e2108924118(2021)
2021
-
[18]
Gong and X
C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructuredevices,Science 363,eaav4450(2019)
2019
-
[19]
K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waalsmaterials,Nature 563,47(2018)
2018
-
[20]
8,25(2023)
D.Zhang,P.Schoenherr,P.Sharma,andJ.Seidel,FerroelectricorderinvanderWaals layeredmaterials,Nat.Rev.Mater. 8,25(2023)
2023
-
[21]
An and S
M. An and S. Dong, Ferroic orders in two-dimensional transition/rare-earth metal halides,APLMater. 8,110704(2020)
2020
-
[22]
Y. Jiao, X. T. Zeng, C. Chen, Z. Gao, K. Song, X. L. Sheng, and S. A. Yang, Monolayer and bilayer PtCl3: energetics,magnetism,and bandtopology, Phys.Rev. B 107,075436(2023)
2023
-
[23]
X. Kong, H. Yoon, M. J. Han, and L. Liang, Switching interlayer magnetic order in bilayerCrI3bystackingreversal,Nanoscale 13,16172(2021)
2021
-
[24]
W. Xun, C. Wu, H. Sun, W. Zhang, Y. Z. Wu, and P. Li, Coexisting magnetism, ferroelectric, and ferrovalley multiferroic in stacking-dependent two-dimensional materials,NanoLett. 24,3541(2024)
2024
-
[25]
Sivadas, S
N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, X. Xu, C. J. Fennie, and D. Xiao, Stacking-dependent magnetisminbilayerCrI3,NanoLett. 18,7658(2018)
2018
-
[26]
X. Li, X. Xu, H. Zhou, H. Jia, E. Wang, H. Fu, J. T. Sun, and S. Meng, Tunable topologicalstatesinstackedcherninsulatorbilayers,NanoLett. 23,2839(2023)
2023
-
[27]
T. Cao, D. F. Shao, K. Huang, G. Gurung, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Switchable anomalous hall effects in polar-stacked 2D antiferromagnet MnBi2Te4, Nano Lett. 23, 3781 (2023)
2023
-
[28]
Li and M
L. Li and M. Wu, Binary compound bilayer and multilayer with vertical polarizations: two-dimensional ferroelectrics, multiferroics, andnanogenerators, ACS Nano 11, 6382 (2017)
2017
-
[29]
N. Ding, J. Chen, C. Gui, H. You, X. Yao, and S. Dong, Phase competition and negative piezoelectricity in interlayer-sliding ferroelectric ZrI2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 084405(2021)
2021
-
[30]
9,7160(2018)
Q.Yang,M.Wu,andJ.Li,Originoftwo-dimensionalverticalferroelectricityinWTe2 bilayerandmultilayer,J.Phys.Chem.Lett. 9,7160(2018)
2018
-
[31]
A.Gao et al., Layer Hall effect in a2D topological axionantiferromagnet, Nature 595, 521(2021)
2021
-
[32]
R. Peng, T. Zhang, Z. He, Q. Wu, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Intrinsic layer- polarized anomalous Hall effect in bilayer MnBi2Te4, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085411 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Zhang, X
T. Zhang, X. Xu, B. Huang, Y. Dai, L. Kou, and Y. Ma, Layer-polarized anomalous HalleffectsinvalleytronicvanderWaalsbilayers,Mater.Horizons 10,483(2022)
2022
-
[34]
Zhang, X
T. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Guo, Y. Dai, and Y. Ma, Layer-polarized anomalous Hall effects frominversion-symmetricsingle-layerlattices,NanoLett. 24,1009(2024)
2024
-
[35]
Chang,M.Freiberg,K.Peters, E.M.Peters,A.Ormeci,L
H.G.VonSchnering, J.H. Chang,M.Freiberg,K.Peters, E.M.Peters,A.Ormeci,L. Schröder, G. Thiele, and C. Röhr, Structure and bonding of the mixed-valent platinum trihalides,PtCl3andPtBr3,Z.Anorg.Allg.Chem. 630,109(2004)
2004
-
[36]
P. W. D.-C. Priv.-Doz. Dr. G. Thiele, Platin(III)-bromid – ein neuer Strukturtyp von AB3-Verbindungen,Angew.Chem.706(1969)
1969
-
[37]
149,377(1925)
D.binärenB.undJ.L.WöhlerandF.MüllerandD.Platins,DieBinärenBromideund JodidedesPlatins,Z.Anorg.Allg.Chem. 149,377(1925)
1925
-
[38]
J. Y. You, Z. Zhang, B. Gu, and G. Su, Two-dimensional room-temperature ferromagnetic semiconductors with quantum anomalous hall effect, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12,024063(2019)
2019
-
[39]
X. Xu, Z. Sun, X. Wang, Z. Gao, L. Guan, S. Zhang, P. Chang, and J. Tao, Tunable magnetic coupling and high Curie temperature of two–dimensional PtBr3 via van der waalsheterostructures,Appl.Surf.Sci. 572,151478(2022)
2022
-
[40]
J. Y. You, X. J. Dong, B. Gu, and G. Su, Possible Room-Temperature Ferromagnetic Semiconductors,ChinesePhys.Lett. 40,067502(2023)
2023
-
[41]
Šmejkal, L
L. Šmejkal, L. Šmejkal, L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809(2020)
2020
-
[42]
Feng et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat
Z. Feng et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5,735(2022)
2022
-
[43]
Šmejkal, A
L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hallantiferromagnets,Nat.Rev.Mater. 7,482(2022)
2022
-
[44]
Kresse and D
G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wavemethod,Phys.Rev.B 59,1758(1999)
1999
-
[45]
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple,Phys.Rev.Lett. 77,3865(1996)
1996
-
[46]
S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study,Phys.Rev.B 57,1505(1998)
1998
-
[47]
Grimme, J
S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elementsH-Pu,J.Chem.Phys. 132,154104(2010)
2010
-
[48]
A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys.Commun. 178,685(2008)
2008
-
[49]
Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, WannierTools: An open-sourcesoftwarepackagefornoveltopologicalmaterials,Comput.Phys.Commun. 224,405(2018)
2018
-
[50]
113,9901 (2000)
G.Henkelman,B.P.Uberuaga,andH.Jónsson,Aclimbingimagenudgedelasticband methodforfindingsaddlepointsandminimumenergypaths,J.Chem.Phys. 113,9901 (2000)
2000
-
[51]
Landron and M
S. Landron and M. B. Lepetit, Importance of t2g-eg hybridization in transition metal oxides,Phys.Rev.B 77,125106(2008)
2008
-
[52]
Zeng and Y
S. Zeng and Y. J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorizationusingspingrouptheory,Phys.Rev.B 110,54406(2024)
2024
-
[53]
See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.xxx.xxxxxx for the DFT- calculated lattice constants of bulk PtBr3, in comparison with experimental result; the spin-splitting in electric band structure of MnBr3; contour plot of Berry curvature of...
-
[54]
H. Lv,Y. Niu,X. Wu,and J.Yang, Electric-field tunable magnetism in van der Waals bilayers with A-type antiferromagnetic order: unipolar versus bipolar magnetic semiconductor,NanoLett. 21,7050(2021)
2021
-
[55]
N. Ding, K. Yananose, C. Rizza, F. R. Fan, S. Dong, and A. Stroppa, Magneto-optical Kerr effect in ferroelectric antiferromagnetic two-dimensional heterostructures, ACS Appl.Mater.Interfaces 15,22282(2023)
2023
-
[56]
K. Yang, W. Hu, H. Wu, M.-H. Whangbo, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Stroppa, Magneto- optical Kerr switching properties of (CrI3)2 and (CrBr3/CrI3) bilayers, ACS Appl. Electron.Mater. 2,1373(2020)
2020
-
[57]
Sivadas, S
N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Gate-controllable magneto-optic Kerr effect in layeredcollinearantiferromagnets,Phys.Rev.Lett. 117,267203(2016)
2016
-
[58]
B. Pan, P. Zhou, P. Lyu, H. Xiao, X. Yang, and L. Sun, General stacking theory for altermagnetisminbilayersystems,Phys.Rev.Lett. 133,166701(2024)
2024
-
[59]
Zeng and Y.-J
S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Bilayer stacking A-type altermagnet: A general approach to generatingtwo-dimensionalaltermagnetism,arXiv:2407.15097
Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.