Mirror Target YOLO: An Improved YOLOv8 Method with Indirect Vision for Heritage Buildings Fire Detection

Jian Liang; Junsheng Cheng

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 39 references

Mirror Target YOLO: An Improved YOLOv8 Method with Indirect Vision for Heritage Buildings Fire Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MITA-YOLO claims that aiming a fire-detection network only at mirror-reflected target zones improves accuracy while cutting the number of cameras needed.

desk verdict A sensible mirror-plus-mask proof-of-concept for heritage fire detection whose main gains depend on an unspecified Target-Net and a synthetic-only evaluation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13997 v1 pith:BZC56OZA submitted 2024-11-21 cs.CV cs.AI

Jian Liang , JunSheng Cheng This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CVcs.AI

keywords firedetectionheritagebuildingsindirectvisionmirrorYOLOv8targetmaskobjectattentionmechanism

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that a fire-detection network can be made both cheaper to install and more accurate by viewing fire-risk zones through mirrors and then masking out everything outside the mirrored regions. It introduces MITA-YOLO, a YOLOv8-based detector with a Target-Mask module that automatically finds mirror boundaries and restricts detection to the indirect-vision areas, so the model ignores non-interest zones such as hallways and decorations. On an 800-image synthetic dataset of a heritage building, the method reaches 93.8% precision, 87.6% recall, and 91.6% mAP50, outperforming YOLOv8n by 3.7 mAP50 points and beating six mainstream detectors. If the result holds in real buildings, the same camera count can cover more occluded spaces while producing fewer false alarms and fewer missed fires.

What carries the argument

The Target-Mask module, inserted between the input and the backbone of YOLOv8, is the mechanism that carries the argument. It has three sub-modules: the Indirect Vision Recognizer (IVR), a pre-trained network called Target-Net that locates mirror boundaries in the image; the Targeted Mask Generator (TMG), which turns those boundary locations into a binary mask of the indirect-vision areas; and the Mask Blender (MB), which multiplies the mask into the image so every pixel outside the mirrored zones is removed before detection. Removing any one sub-module collapses performance back to the YOLOv8n baseline, showing that the mask path, not the backbone, produces the gain.

What would settle it

Run MITA-YOLO on a real, non-heritage room fitted with acrylic mirrors and a controlled fire simulator (e.g., a smoke machine and a flame-like lamp), using the same camera and mirror layout as the synthetic scenes. If the Target-Mask module fails to segment the mirror regions, or if precision and recall on these real frames fall far below the reported 93.8% and 87.6%, the claimed transfer to deployed fire detection is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MITA-YOLO's central claim is that indirect vision, mirror reflections aligned with pre-selected high-risk areas, can be turned into a spatial prior for deep learning fire detection. A single camera with wide-angle mirrors aimed at several target zones captures multiple indirect views in one frame. The Target-Mask module detects mirror edges with a pre-trained network, generates a mask from those boundaries, and blends the mask into the image so only indirect-vision pixels reach the detector. This filtering removes non-interest areas entirely, which the paper argues is why precision rises from 87.1% to 93.8% and recall from 84.6% to 87.6% compared to plain YOLOv8n on the same data. The result is presented as evidence that fewer cameras, less wiring, and better focus can be achieved together rather than traded off.

Load-bearing premise

The whole evaluation rests on 3DMAX-rendered virtual fires, mirrors, and building scenes standing in for real heritage-building conditions, while the module that finds mirror boundaries is never tested on real camera images.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single camera with two or more angled mirrors can cover several occluded high-risk zones in an irregular space, so the number of cameras, cables, and drill holes in heritage buildings can be cut.
Because non-interest areas are removed before detection, stationary decorations, flags, or passers-by cannot trigger false alarms, so venue staff are not called out for non-fires.
The mask encodes the building manager's prior judgement about which zones are fire-prone, transferring that expertise into the model without extra training data for those zones.
The same mirror-plus-mask design applies to any monocular-vision task where coverage must be expanded and only certain regions matter, such as warehouse monitoring or vehicle surround views.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The reported gains may come largely from removing background noise rather than from a genuinely better detector; a fair test would compare a full-image detector on mirrored frames against a masked detector, both on the same real scenes.
The Target-Net's mirror-boundary detection is asserted but not evaluated, so if mirror placement varies or lighting changes, the mask could drift and erase the very fire it should find; a real-world dataset with annotated mirror edges would settle this.
The synthetic 3DMAX dataset likely understates real-world challenges such as motion blur, smoke occlusion, and changing daylight, so the headline numbers should be treated as an upper bound until tested with real fires or fire simulants in a mock structure.
Because the mask is a hard spatial gate, a fire that starts just outside a mirror's field of view is invisible by design; the system's safety depends on the completeness of the mirror coverage, which the paper does not quantify.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a clean engineering proof-of-concept: put wide-angle mirrors in a heritage building to bend sightlines around obstacles, then train YOLOv8 to detect fires only inside the mirrored regions by masking everything else. What's new is the combination of indirect vision and a learned mask for fire detection, plus an 800-image synthetic dataset rendered in 3DMAX from a real heritage site. The experiments are internally consistent, the ablations behave as the pipeline predicts, and the comparisons cover a decent set of detectors and attention modules.

That said, the load-bearing component is under-specified. The Target-Mask module depends on Target-Net to locate mirror boundaries, but the paper gives no architecture, training set, or independent test for it. The ablation only shows that removing IVR produces a black mask; it doesn't tell us whether Target-Net generalizes to a different camera-mirror setup or a real building. On the synthetic dataset, the mask boundaries are essentially known from the rendering geometry, so the 3.7-point mAP50 gain over YOLOv8n is not yet evidence that the automatic component works in deployment. This is the softest link, and the stress-test note gets it right.

The second soft spot is the evidence base: one building, one synthetic domain, a single 560/120/120 split, no error bars or multi-seed runs. The claim that camera count is 'significantly reduced' is asserted from the geometry, not measured in any experiment. The synthetic-only fidelity issue compounds both gaps. The related-work citations are a bit scattershot, with some references only loosely tied to the text, but nothing that looks like misconduct. These limitations are real, but they don't sink the idea: the paper is a plausible early proof-of-concept for a constrained but practical application.

Who is this for? Researchers working on practical fire monitoring in heritage buildings, and people interested in using mirrors to extend camera coverage in scenes with occlusions. It won't reshape object detection, but it is a sensible combination with a believable benefit. I would send it to a serious referee, mainly to force the authors to specify and evaluate Target-Net and to add at least basic robustness checks such as multiple splits or real-image tests. Without those, the paper stays a promising workshop-level proof-of-concept rather than a deployable method.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MITA-YOLO, a fire-detection method for heritage buildings that uses mirrors to create indirect views, expanding each camera's field of view so that fewer cameras are needed, and a Target-Mask module that filters the image to the mirrored (target) regions. The Target-Mask module is said to automatically identify mirror boundaries via a pretrained network called Target-Net, generate a mask, and blend it with the input image before detection with an improved YOLOv8. Experiments are performed on a synthetic 800-image dataset rendered in 3DMAX, with four target areas and one non-interest area, some images containing flags as noise. The paper reports that MITA-YOLO reaches 93.8% precision, 87.6% recall, and 91.6% mAP50, surpassing YOLOv8n and five other detectors on mAP50. Ablations show that each of the three Target-Mask sub-modules is necessary for the gain.

Significance. The application is genuinely motivated: reducing invasive camera and cabling installations in heritage buildings is an important practical problem, and using mirrors to extend a monocular camera's coverage is a simple, low-cost idea with clear deployment logic. The internal consistency of the experiments is a strength: the ablations in Table III behave exactly as the pipeline design predicts, and the comparison with six YOLO variants shows a plausible improvement. The main value of the paper is the system concept and the demonstration on a purpose-built synthetic dataset, not the novelty of any individual component. However, the paper does not release the dataset, code, or Target-Net weights, which limits reproducibility and independent verification.

major comments (4)

[Section III-B, Tables III and IV] The central mechanism of the claimed improvement is the Target-Mask module's ability to 'automatically identify' indirect-vision boundaries, attributed to a pretrained network called Target-Net. Yet the paper never specifies Target-Net's architecture, training data, loss function, or independent test accuracy. The ablation in Table III removes the IVR sub-module and reports a black mask, but this only shows that without IVR the system fails under the known mirror geometry of the rendered scenes; it does not evaluate whether Target-Net can locate mirror boundaries in unseen images, especially real camera-plus-mirror images. Since the reported mAP50 gain of 3.7 points (Table IV) depends on correctly masking non-interest areas, the entire empirical contribution rests on an unvalidated component. This is load-bearing and needs to be addressed with a specification and an evaluation of Target-Net, ideally on held-out synthetic scenes and on real images.
[Section IV-A and Table IV] All quantitative results are based on one 800-image synthetic dataset, with a single random split (560/120/120), no multiple seeds, and no confidence intervals or error bars. The paper acknowledges that real fire tests are prohibited in heritage buildings, which justifies the synthetic approach as a first step, but the claims in the Abstract and Conclusion that MITA-YOLO 'significantly reduces camera requirements' and achieves 'superior detection performance' go beyond what this evidence can support. In particular, the transfer of rendered fire, mirror reflection, and building geometry to physical conditions is unverified. At minimum, the authors should report variance over multiple training runs, describe the synthetic-to-real gap and its likely effect, and temper the deployment claims until real-world validation is available.
[Abstract and Section III-A] The paper's headline claim that the method 'significantly reduces camera requirements' is not directly measured or simulated. The paper qualitatively argues that mirrors expand the field of view, but it never quantifies the number of cameras needed with versus without the mirror setup for the studied building, nor does it analyze the geometric conditions under which indirect vision actually reduces camera count. A concrete deployment analysis, even on the 3DMAX scene, is needed to substantiate this claim. Without it, the camera-reduction contribution is an assertion, not a result.
[Section IV-A and Section IV-G] The claimed resistance to noise interference is not quantitatively evaluated. The dataset contains 100 images with flags in the non-interest area, but the paper does not report the composition of the test set (e.g., how many of the 120 test images contain noise), nor does it report precision, recall, or false-alarm rate separately on the noisy subset. The comparison in Figure 8 is anecdotal and shows only two examples. Since the paper explicitly argues that filtering non-interest areas reduces false alarms, this is a testable claim that should be measured with a noise-specific breakdown.

minor comments (6)

[Table II and Section IV-D] The table header contains a typo: 'Taget-Mask' should be 'Target-Mask'. In addition, the text in Section IV-D states that Target-Mask outperforms CBAM by 5% in precision (93.8 vs 87.8), which is correct, but the phrasing 'in the comparison of Precision indicators' is unclear and should be reworded.
[Section IV-C] The evaluation metrics paragraph defines mAP but does not state whether the reported mAP50 is a single-class average or a multiclass average; since the paper mentions 'fire and smoke targets' in Section III-B but the dataset appears to contain fire only, the class definition should be made explicit.
[Section IV-A] The description of the non-interest area and the noise flags is brief; it would be helpful to provide example images with and without flags and to state the exact number of noise images in the training, validation, and test splits.
[Section IV-B] The hardware/software table lists 'I9-12490F' as CPU; this appears to be a typo for an Intel Core processor model. Also, PyTorch version 1.9.2 is older than the YOLOv8 release, which is suspicious; please verify the environment actually used.
[Section IV-F] The model is referred to as 'Target-YOLO' in the text ('When comparing Target-YOLO with the baseline model YOLOv8n'), but the paper's name is MITA-YOLO; this inconsistency should be fixed.
[References] The paper cites related work on attention mechanisms and frequency-domain methods (e.g., [19,20,24,26,27]) but does not connect these citations to the proposed method's design choices; the related-work section would benefit from a clear explanation of why these particular models are relevant to indirect-vision fire detection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: reported gains are held-out empirical benchmarks, not reductions to inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical: MITA-YOLO combines mirror-based indirect vision with a Target-Mask preprocessing module and is evaluated on a synthetic 800-image dataset with a standard train/validation/test split. No equation or fitted parameter is used both as an input and as the claimed prediction. The Target-Mask module is a preprocessing stage applied uniformly to training and test images; the reported precision, recall, and mAP50 values are measured on held-out test images, so they are genuine experimental results rather than consequences of the training objective. The lack of specification and independent evaluation of Target-Net is a completeness and external-validity limitation, not a circularity: even if the mask were generated from known mirror geometry rather than a learned network, the detector evaluation would still be an independent benchmark on held-out images. The synthetic-domain fidelity concern is a generalization risk, not an input-output equivalence. No load-bearing self-citation chain exists, and no 'uniqueness theorem' or predefined ansatz is invoked to force the result. Therefore the paper does not exhibit circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the geometric mirror model, the validity of the synthetic dataset, and the reliability of the pretrained mask predictor. The hand-chosen test scenario (four target areas, one non-interest zone, 100 noise images, 560/120/120 split) shapes all reported metrics. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

Number of target monitoring areas and non-interest area = 4 target areas, 1 non-interest area
Hand-chosen layout for the 3DMAX building model; detection coverage and evaluated false-alarm scenario depend on this configuration.
Noise images with flags in non-interest area = 100 of 800 images
Hand-selected fraction to test anti-interference; results on the noisy subset are not reported separately.
Training/validation/test split sizes = 560/120/120
Single random split without repeated runs or cross-validation; all metrics depend on this split.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Mirror reflection follows geometric optics, so adjusting mirror position and angle aligns indirect views with target monitoring areas.
Section III-A relies on this to claim reduced camera count and aligned target areas; no mirror distortion, reflection loss, or calibration error is modeled.
domain assumption 3DMAX-rendered virtual scenes faithfully represent real fires, smoke, mirror reflections, and heritage building interiors.
Section IV-A explains that real fire tests are not allowed, so all empirical evidence is synthetic; transferability to real scenes is assumed without validation.
ad hoc to paper Target-Net, a pretrained network, accurately and reliably identifies indirect vision boundaries in every image.
Section III-B introduces Target-Net without architecture, pretraining data, or error analysis; the entire Target-Mask pipeline depends on this mask being correct.
domain assumption The ceiling non-interest area has near-zero fire probability, so masking it out does not hide real fire events.
Section IV-A justifies excluding the ceiling because it is non-combustible and far from crowds; this is a site-specific judgment that may not generalize.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mirror Target YOLO: An Improved YOLOv8 Method with Indirect Vision for Heritage Buildings Fire Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BZC56OZA

@misc{pith2026241113997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mirror Target YOLO: An Improved YOLOv8 Method with Indirect Vision for Heritage Buildings Fire Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BZC56OZA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13997}
}

read the original abstract

Fires can cause severe damage to heritage buildings, making timely fire detection essential. Traditional dense cabling and drilling can harm these structures, so reducing the number of cameras to minimize such impact is challenging. Additionally, avoiding false alarms due to noise sensitivity and preserving the expertise of managers in fire-prone areas is crucial. To address these needs, we propose a fire detection method based on indirect vision, called Mirror Target YOLO (MITA-YOLO). MITA-YOLO integrates indirect vision deployment and an enhanced detection module. It uses mirror angles to achieve indirect views, solving issues with limited visibility in irregular spaces and aligning each indirect view with the target monitoring area. The Target-Mask module is designed to automatically identify and isolate the indirect vision areas in each image, filtering out non-target areas. This enables the model to inherit managers' expertise in assessing fire-risk zones, improving focus and resistance to interference in fire detection.In our experiments, we created an 800-image fire dataset with indirect vision. Results show that MITA-YOLO significantly reduces camera requirements while achieving superior detection performance compared to other mainstream models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13997 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** When the camera is deployed at a position directly facing the gate and only direct vision is used, due to the irregular shape of the indoor space, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** After the mirrors were deployed, the corresponding target areas could be seen in the indirect vision in the mirrors, realizing the expansion of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** First, deploy the mirror system in the irregular space. Then, input the detection images obtained by the camera into the improved detection model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Example of experimental data. shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The Target-Mask is added to the neck between the data input and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Results of ablation experiment. field of view, it will assume that there is no indirect field of view in the original image and thus generate a completely black mask, which is passed to the MB sub-module to be superimposed with the original image data. This will filter…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Comparison of detection results between YOLOv8n and MITA-YOLO. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings,

F. Ribera, A. Nestic `o, P. Cucco, and G. Maselli, “A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings,” Journal of cultural heritage , vol. 41, pp. 166–177, 2020

work page 2020
[2]

Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century,

E. Garcia-Castillo, I. Paya-Zaforteza, and A. Hospitaler, “Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century,” Developments in the Built Environment , vol. 13, p. 100102, 2023

work page 2023
[3]

Risk protection for cultural her- itage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further re- search needs,

X. Romao and C. Bertolin, “Risk protection for cultural her- itage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further re- search needs,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 67, p. 102652, 2022

work page 2022
[4]

A survey on deep learning and its applications,

S. Dong, P. Wang, and K. Abbas, “A survey on deep learning and its applications,” Computer Science Review , vol. 40, p. 100379, 2021

2021
[5]

Research on fire alarm system,

Z. Chen et al. , “Research on fire alarm system,” Advances in Computer, Signals and Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Automatic fire and smoke detection method for surveillance systems based on dilated cnns,

Y . Valikhujaev, A. Abdusalomov, and Y . I. Cho, “Automatic fire and smoke detection method for surveillance systems based on dilated cnns,” Atmosphere, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1241, 2020

work page 2020
[7]

Fire-net: A deep learning framework for active forest fire detection,

S. T. Seydi, V . Saeidi, B. Kalantar, N. Ueda, and A. A. Halin, “Fire-net: A deep learning framework for active forest fire detection,” Journal of Sensors , vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 8044390, 2022

work page 2022
[8]

An improvement of the fire detection and classifi- cation method using yolov3 for surveillance systems,

A. Abdusalomov, N. Baratov, A. Kutlimuratov, and T. K. Whangbo, “An improvement of the fire detection and classifi- cation method using yolov3 for surveillance systems,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 19, p. 6519, 2021

work page 2021

Show all 39 references

[9]

Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey,

M.-H. Guo, T.-X. Xu, J.-J. Liu, Z.-N. Liu, P.-T. Jiang, T.- J. Mu, S.-H. Zhang, R. R. Martin, M.-M. Cheng, and S.-M. Hu, “Attention mechanisms in computer vision: A survey,” Computational visual media , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 331–368, 2022

2022
[10]

A comprehensive review of yolo architectures in computer vision: From yolov1 to yolov8 and yolo-nas,

J. Terven, D.-M. C ´ordova-Esparza, and J.-A. Romero-Gonz´alez, “A comprehensive review of yolo architectures in computer vision: From yolov1 to yolov8 and yolo-nas,”Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1680–1716, 2023

2023
[11]

Investigating the critical issues in the conservation of heritage building: The case of china,

M. Shan, Y .-F. Chen, Z. Zhai, and J. Du, “Investigating the critical issues in the conservation of heritage building: The case of china,” Journal of Building Engineering , vol. 51, p. 104319, 2022

2022
[12]

A review: The analysis of fires in chinese historic building and research progress on the fire protection,

B. Zhou, C. Jiang, K. Wang, X. Rom ˜ao, H. Yoshioka, W. Wang, Z. Tao, and H. Zhao, “A review: The analysis of fires in chinese historic building and research progress on the fire protection,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress , p. 102850, 2024

2024
[13]

Non-destructive techniques (ndt) for the diagnosis of heritage buildings: Traditional procedures and futures perspectives,

B. Tejedor, E. Lucchi, D. Bienvenido-Huertas, and I. Nardi, “Non-destructive techniques (ndt) for the diagnosis of heritage buildings: Traditional procedures and futures perspectives,” En- ergy and Buildings , vol. 263, p. 112029, 2022

2022
[14]

Recent advances in sensors for fire detection,

F. Khan, Z. Xu, J. Sun, F. M. Khan, A. Ahmed, and Y . Zhao, “Recent advances in sensors for fire detection,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 3310, 2022

2022
[15]

Wildland forest fire smoke detection based on faster r-cnn using synthetic smoke images,

Q.-X. Zhang, G.-H. Lin, Y .-M. Zhang, G. Xu, and J.-J. Wang, “Wildland forest fire smoke detection based on faster r-cnn using synthetic smoke images,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 211, pp. 441–446, 2018

2018
[16]

Inte- grating multiple factors to optimize watchtower deployment for wildfire detection,

F. Zhang, P. Zhao, S. Xu, Y . Wu, X. Yang, and Y . Zhang, “Inte- grating multiple factors to optimize watchtower deployment for wildfire detection,” Science of the total environment , vol. 737, p. 139561, 2020

2020
[17]

Information-guided flame detection based on faster r-cnn,

C. Chaoxia, W. Shang, and F. Zhang, “Information-guided flame detection based on faster r-cnn,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 58 923–58 932, 2020

2020
[18]

Forest flame detection in unmanned aerial vehicle imagery based on yolov5,

H. Liu, H. Hu, F. Zhou, and H. Yuan, “Forest flame detection in unmanned aerial vehicle imagery based on yolov5,” Fire, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 279, 2023

2023
[19]

Advancing pose-guided image synthesis with progressive con- ditional diffusion models,

F. Shen, H. Ye, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Han, and Y . Wei, “Advancing pose-guided image synthesis with progressive con- ditional diffusion models,” in The Twelfth International Confer- ence on Learning Representations , 2023

2023
[20]

Boosting consistency in story visualization with rich-contextual conditional diffusion models,

F. Shen, H. Ye, S. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Han, and W. Yang, “Boosting consistency in story visualization with rich-contextual conditional diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02482, 2024

2024 arXiv
[21]

An improved fire detection approach based on yolo-v8 for smart cities,

F. M. Talaat and H. ZainEldin, “An improved fire detection approach based on yolo-v8 for smart cities,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 28, pp. 20 939–20 954, 2023

2023
[22]

Mirror training device improves dental students’ performance on virtual simulation dental training system,

F. Chu, J. Zheng, Q. Wang, X. Lu, Y . Chen, Y . Zhong, Y . Li, J. Shi, Y . Jiang, W. Zhang et al. , “Mirror training device improves dental students’ performance on virtual simulation dental training system,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 315, 2023

2023
[23]

Enhancing landslide segmentation with guide attention mechanism and fast fourier transformer,

K. Yan, F. Shen, and Z. Li, “Enhancing landslide segmentation with guide attention mechanism and fast fourier transformer,” in International Conference on Intelligent Computing . Springer, 2024, pp. 296–307

2024
[24]

Triplet contrastive learn- ing for unsupervised vehicle re-identification,

F. Shen, X. Du, L. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Triplet contrastive learn- ing for unsupervised vehicle re-identification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09498, 2023

2023 arXiv
[25]

Attending overtaking cars and motorcycles through the mirrors before changing lanes,

A. Shahar, E. Van Loon, D. Clarke, and D. Crundall, “Attending overtaking cars and motorcycles through the mirrors before changing lanes,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 104–110, 2012

2012
[26]

A novel multi-frequency coordinated module for sar ship detection,

C. Qiao, F. Shen, X. Wang, R. Wang, F. Cao, S. Zhao, and C. Li, “A novel multi-frequency coordinated module for sar ship detection,” in 2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 804–811

2022
[27]

A novel cross frequency-domain interaction learning for aerial oriented object detection,

W. Weng, W. Lin, F. Lin, J. Ren, and F. Shen, “A novel cross frequency-domain interaction learning for aerial oriented object detection,” in Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision (PRCV) . Springer, 2023, pp. 292–305

2023
[28]

An improved forest fire detection method based on the detectron2 model and a deep learning approach,

A. B. Abdusalomov, B. M. S. Islam, R. Nasimov, M. Mukhid- dinov, and T. K. Whangbo, “An improved forest fire detection method based on the detectron2 model and a deep learning approach,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 3, p. 1512, 2023

2023
[29]

Fire-yolo: A small target object detection method for fire inspection,

L. Zhao, L. Zhi, C. Zhao, and W. Zheng, “Fire-yolo: A small target object detection method for fire inspection,” Sustainabil- ity, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 4930, 2022

2022
[30]

Attention based cnn model for fire detection and localization in real-world images,

S. Majid, F. Alenezi, S. Masood, M. Ahmad, E. S. G ¨und¨uz, and K. Polat, “Attention based cnn model for fire detection and localization in real-world images,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 189, p. 116114, 2022

2022
[31]

Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,

S. Woo, J. Park, and J. Y . Lee, “Cbam: Convolutional block attention module,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3–19, 2018

2018
[32]

Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design,

Q. Hou, D. Zhou, and J. Feng, “Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 13 708–13 717, 2021

2021
[33]

Sa-net: Shuffle attention for deep convolutional neural networks,

Q.-L. Zhang and Y .-B. Yang, “Sa-net: Shuffle attention for deep convolutional neural networks,” in ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021, pp. 2235–2239

2021
[34]

Fast and accurate detection of kiwifruit in orchard using improved yolov3-tiny model,

L. Fu, Y . Feng, J. Wu, Z. Liu, F. Gao, Y . Majeed, A. Al-Mallahi, Q. Zhang, R. Li, and Y . Cui, “Fast and accurate detection of kiwifruit in orchard using improved yolov3-tiny model,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 22, pp. 754–776, 2021

2021
[35]

Application of local fully convolutional neural network combined with yolo v5 algorithm in small target detection of remote sensing image,

W. Wu, H. Liu, L. Li, Y . Long, X. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Li, and Y . Chang, “Application of local fully convolutional neural network combined with yolo v5 algorithm in small target detection of remote sensing image,” PloS one, vol. 16, no. 10, p. e0259283, 2021

2021
[36]

Tea tree pest de- tection algorithm based on improved yolov7-tiny,

Z. Yang, H. Feng, Y . Ruan, and X. Weng, “Tea tree pest de- tection algorithm based on improved yolov7-tiny,” Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 1031, 2023

2023
[37]

Dc-yolov8: small-size object detection algorithm based on camera sensor,

H. Lou, X. Duan, J. Guo, H. Liu, J. Gu, L. Bi, and H. Chen, “Dc-yolov8: small-size object detection algorithm based on camera sensor,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2323, 2023

2023
[38]

Research on fire smoke detection algorithm based on improved yolov8,

T. Zhang, F. Wang, W. Wang, Q. Zhao, W. Ning, and H. Wu, “Research on fire smoke detection algorithm based on improved yolov8,” IEEE Access, 2024

2024
[39]

Yolov9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient informa- tion,

C.-Y . Wang, I.-H. Yeh, and H.-Y . Mark Liao, “Yolov9: Learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient informa- tion,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 1–21

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings,

F. Ribera, A. Nestic `o, P. Cucco, and G. Maselli, “A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings,” Journal of cultural heritage , vol. 41, pp. 166–177, 2020

work page 2020

[2] [2]

Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century,

E. Garcia-Castillo, I. Paya-Zaforteza, and A. Hospitaler, “Fire in heritage and historic buildings, a major challenge for the 21st century,” Developments in the Built Environment , vol. 13, p. 100102, 2023

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Risk protection for cultural her- itage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further re- search needs,

X. Romao and C. Bertolin, “Risk protection for cultural her- itage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further re- search needs,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 67, p. 102652, 2022

work page 2022

[4] [4]

A survey on deep learning and its applications,

S. Dong, P. Wang, and K. Abbas, “A survey on deep learning and its applications,” Computer Science Review , vol. 40, p. 100379, 2021

2021

[5] [5]

Research on fire alarm system,

Z. Chen et al. , “Research on fire alarm system,” Advances in Computer, Signals and Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2022

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Automatic fire and smoke detection method for surveillance systems based on dilated cnns,

Y . Valikhujaev, A. Abdusalomov, and Y . I. Cho, “Automatic fire and smoke detection method for surveillance systems based on dilated cnns,” Atmosphere, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 1241, 2020

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Fire-net: A deep learning framework for active forest fire detection,

S. T. Seydi, V . Saeidi, B. Kalantar, N. Ueda, and A. A. Halin, “Fire-net: A deep learning framework for active forest fire detection,” Journal of Sensors , vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 8044390, 2022

work page 2022

[8] [8]

An improvement of the fire detection and classifi- cation method using yolov3 for surveillance systems,

A. Abdusalomov, N. Baratov, A. Kutlimuratov, and T. K. Whangbo, “An improvement of the fire detection and classifi- cation method using yolov3 for surveillance systems,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 19, p. 6519, 2021

work page 2021