Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: Techniques and Business Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.14033 v2 pith:MXOCJCAH submitted 2024-11-21 cs.AI

LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: Techniques and Business Perspectives

classification cs.AI
keywords lamasagentssystembusinesstoolsautonomousdataentity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the era of (multi-modal) large language models, most operational processes can be reformulated and reproduced using LLM agents. The LLM agents can perceive, control, and get feedback from the environment so as to accomplish the given tasks in an autonomous manner. Besides the environment-interaction property, the LLM agents can call various external tools to ease the task completion process. The tools can be regarded as a predefined operational process with private or real-time knowledge that does not exist in the parameters of LLMs. As a natural trend of development, the tools for calling are becoming autonomous agents, thus the full intelligent system turns out to be a LLM-based Multi-Agent System (LaMAS). Compared to the previous single-LLM-agent system, LaMAS has the advantages of i) dynamic task decomposition and organic specialization, ii) higher flexibility for system changing, iii) proprietary data preserving for each participating entity, and iv) feasibility of monetization for each entity. This paper discusses the technical and business landscapes of LaMAS. To support the ecosystem of LaMAS, we provide a preliminary version of such LaMAS protocol considering technical requirements, data privacy, and business incentives. As such, LaMAS would be a practical solution to achieve artificial collective intelligence in the near future.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A survey that unifies prior work on multi-agent LLM systems via the LIFE framework, mapping dependencies across collaboration, failure attribution, and autonomous self-evolution while identifying cross-stage challenges.

  2. The Vision Wormhole: Latent-Space Communication in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reasoning messages between heterogeneous VLMs can be routed through the image-token span: a distilled universal codec plus affine alignment transmits latent traces across model families, cutting wall-clock time in sma...

  3. Latent Collaboration in Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Replacing text inter-agent dialogue with direct transfer of hidden-state (KV-cache) representations cuts output tokens by ~70-84%, speeds inference ~4x, and keeps multi-agent accuracy roughly on par or slightly better.

  4. Runtime Uncertainty Monitoring for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Using Bayesian Networks

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A Bayesian-network monitor built on calibrated LLM log-probabilities gives workflow-level uncertainty scores for an actuarial multi-agent system, reproducing baseline RMSE but not clearly separating normal from pertur...

  5. Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    The survey proposes the LIFE framework to unify fragmented research on collaboration, failure attribution, and self-evolution in LLM multi-agent systems into a progression toward self-organizing intelligence.

  6. Cost and Accuracy of Long-Term Memory in Distributed Multi-Agent Systems Based on Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0

    A two-framework testbed comparison claims mem0 is Pareto-optimal over Graphiti for distributed LLM agents because its lower cost is paired with accuracy that is not significantly different.

  7. Latent Collaboration in Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.CL 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    LatentMAS lets LLM agents reason and communicate in continuous hidden space via latent thoughts and KV-cache transfer, reporting higher accuracy and much lower token use than text-based multi-agent baselines.

  8. Position: Agentic AI System Is a Foreseeable Pathway to AGI

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Agentic AI systems with DAG topologies are claimed to deliver exponentially superior generalization and sample efficiency compared to monolithic scaling for achieving AGI.