Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Ferroelectric Nanoparticles in Liquid Crystals: The Role of Ionic Transport at Small Concentrations of the Nanoparticles

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultra-dilute ferroelectric nanoparticles measurably suppress ionic current in a liquid-crystal cell, and the paper attributes the effect to polarized ionic-electronic screening clouds around each nanoparticle rather than to any change in…

desk verdict The observed NP-induced current drop is exactly what you'd expect from the 0.6–0.7 µm thickness differences alone; replication with matched-thickness cells is needed before believing the mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14118 v1 pith:2DGI43IC submitted 2024-11-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.soft

Juliya M. Gudenko , Oleksandr S. Pylypchuk , Victor V. Vainberg , Igor A. Gvozdovskyy , Serhii E. Ivanchenko , Denis O. Stetsenko , Nicholas V. Morozovsky , Volodymir N. Poroshin
show 2 more authors
Eugene A. Eliseev Anna N. Morozovska
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft
keywords liquidcrystalsferroelectricnanoparticlesbariumtitanateionictransporteffectivemediumapproximationcurrent-voltagecharacteristicscapacitance5CB
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that adding just 0.5 to 1 wt.% of 24-nm BaTiO3 nanoparticles to the nematic liquid crystal 5CB visibly lowers the dc current through a cell and makes its capacitance-voltage loop thinner, compared with a cell filled with pure 5CB. The effect is surprising because such small volume fractions barely change the effective dielectric constant and should not alter the liquid crystal's director or elastic properties. The authors propose that ionic and electronic screening charges covering each ferroelectric nanoparticle become polarized in the external field and slow down ionic transport through the liquid crystal. If this reading is right, it gives device designers a dilute-dopant route to control ionic conductivity and leakage in liquid-crystal cells without disturbing the liquid crystal's orientational behavior.

What carries the argument

The central explanatory object is the ionic-electronic screening cloud around each BaTiO3 nanoparticle: the cloud becomes polarized under an applied field and is proposed to impede ionic transport through the liquid crystal host. The quantitative support is a linearized effective-medium expression for the complex permittivity of a dilute colloid, obtained from the Carr-type EMA equation, in which the nanoparticle phase and the liquid crystal phase each carry their own conductivity and relaxation parameters; fitting those parameters to the measured permittivity and loss spectra gives semi-quantitative agreement with experiment.

What would settle it

Measure current-voltage and capacitance loops on several cells per concentration with matched thicknesses and verified dispersion, and include a control dispersion of non-ferroelectric insulating nanoparticles of similar size and concentration; if the control also suppresses ionic current, the ferroelectric screening-cloud mechanism is not required to explain the observation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ferroelectric nanoparticles at weight fractions of 1% or less still produce a measurable electrical effect: the pure 5CB cell carries more current at the same bias than cells loaded with 0.5 wt.% or 1.0 wt.% BaTiO3, and the pure cell's capacitance loop is the widest, becoming noticeably thinner as nanoparticles are added. The authors argue this cannot come from a direct change in director distribution or elastic properties, since the nanoparticles are too small and too dilute, and instead attribute it to the ionic-electronic screening charges that cover and polarize the ferroelectric nanoparticles in an external field, thereby modifying slow ionic transport in the liquid crystal. They support this picture with an effective-medium calculation of the complex permittivity and losses that reproduces the measured frequency dependences semi-quantitatively.

Load-bearing premise

The samples compared differ not only in nanoparticle concentration: each concentration is represented by a single cell of slightly different thickness, and no dispersion or aggregation check is reported, so the paper assumes those uncontrolled differences do not cause the monotonic current drop.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Adding 0.5–1 wt.% BaTiO3 nanoparticles raises the effective resistance of 5CB cells in dc measurements, so leakage current can be reduced by a very dilute ferroelectric dopant.
  • The capacitance loop narrows with nanoparticle loading, meaning the cell stores less charge over a bias cycle; slow ionic space-charge polarization is suppressed.
  • Because the effect appears without significant change in the effective permittivity, ionic-transport modification is a separate lever from dielectric tuning in liquid-crystal composites.
  • The screening-charge mechanism implies that the nanoparticle surface state, not just its ferroelectric core, controls the electrical response of the colloid.
  • The effective-medium fit indicates the loss minimum near 20 kHz and the merging of high-frequency permittivity curves are governed by the liquid crystal's relaxation time and conductivities, with the nanoparticle contribution remaining small.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the screening-cloud mechanism is right, the current suppression should strengthen with nanoparticle surface charge density and polarization; varying particle size or surface chemistry at fixed weight fraction would be a direct test.
  • The same dilute-dopant strategy might reduce ionic leakage in other ion-containing media, such as electrolytes or ionic-liquid devices, wherever mobile ions dominate low-frequency transport.
  • Frequency-dependent measurements could locate the mechanism: the suppression of ionic current should disappear above the characteristic frequency of the screening-cloud response, a prediction the authors' own loss spectra hint at but do not explicitly extract.
  • A control experiment with non-ferroelectric insulating nanoparticles of similar size and concentration would clarify whether the effect requires ferroelectric polarization or merely particle-induced obstruction of ion motion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports current-voltage, capacitance-voltage, and dielectric spectroscopy measurements on 5CB liquid-crystal cells containing 0, 0.5, and 1 wt.% BaTiO3 nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 24 nm. The central empirical claim is that the pure 5CB cell carries a higher DC current and shows a wider capacitance loop than cells with 0.5–1 wt.% BTO nanoparticles, and the authors propose that ionic-electronic screening charges polarized around the ferroelectric nanoparticles reduce ionic transport. A linearized effective-medium model based on Eq. (2) is used to calculate the frequency-dependent permittivity and loss tangent, with parameters chosen for best agreement with the measured dielectric spectra. The paper concludes that the screening-charge mechanism is a possible explanation for the observed reduction in ionic current.

Significance. If the central trend is real, the result would be a useful and somewhat counterintuitive contribution to the physics of ferroelectric-nanoparticle-doped liquid crystals, since it suggests that sub-weight-percent loadings modify ionic transport without altering the director field. The manuscript includes useful experimental detail (TEM size distribution, Rietveld phase composition, measurement protocol) and an analytic extension of the effective-medium expression in Eq. (2a). However, the experimental evidence rests on one cell per concentration with no error bars, and the theoretical section provides only a fit to the same dielectric data rather than an independent test of the proposed mechanism. The significance is therefore conditional on additional reproducibility and on a more direct model-experiment comparison.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.B, Fig. 3] The central DC-current claim is not established by the presented data because each concentration is represented by a single cell, the cells have different thicknesses (20.0, 20.7, and 20.6 µm for pure, 0.5 wt.%, and 1.0 wt.%), and no error bars or repeated-cell statistics are given. For an ohmic conductor at fixed voltage, I = σAV/d, so the thinnest cell (the pure 5CB cell) is expected to carry about 3.5% more current than the 20.7 µm cell even with identical conductivity; the thickness ordering therefore points in the same direction as the reported monotonic current decrease. To support the central claim, the authors need to show that the thickness-normalized current difference reproducibly exceeds this geometric expectation, using at least several cells per concentration with matched thicknesses or explicit thickness correction and error bars.
  2. [§3.A, Eqs. (2) and Fig. 7] The theoretical model does not independently validate the proposed screening-charge mechanism. Equations (2) describe only the effective complex permittivity of a mixture, with parameters σ_a, σ_b, and τ 'determined from the best agreement' with the experimental spectra in Fig. 6. The model contains no ionic transport equation and no explicit treatment of polarized screening charges around the nanoparticles, so the agreement in Figs. 7(a)-(c) is a fit to the same data used to determine the parameters, not a test of the mechanism. The DC current reduction, which is the paper's main observation, is never modeled. I recommend either removing the claim of quantitative support for the screening-charge mechanism or adding a transport model with independent parameter determination.
  3. [Fig. 7 caption and §3.A] The conversion from weight fraction to volume fraction appears incorrect. The manuscript uses µ = 0.005 and µ = 0.01 for 0.5 wt.% and 1.0 wt.% BTO, respectively. With ρ_BTO ≈ 6 g/cm³ and ρ_5CB ≈ 1 g/cm³, 1 wt.% corresponds to µ ≈ 0.0017, not 0.01, and 0.5 wt.% to µ ≈ 0.0008, not 0.005. Using a volume fraction that is too large by a factor of about six overestimates the NP-induced permittivity change in the effective-medium calculation and weakens the claim of quantitative agreement in Fig. 7(a). The authors should use the correct volume fraction and report the resulting curves.
  4. [§2.B, Fig. 5] The capacitance-voltage comparison has the same single-cell limitation as the DC current comparison, and the loop width is not quantified. The statement that the capacitance loop is 'widest' for the pure cell is based on one measurement per concentration, and at fixed bias the electric field differs slightly because of the thickness differences (20.0 vs. 20.6–20.7 µm). The authors should provide quantitative loop-width values (e.g., area or capacitance change at fixed bias) with uncertainty estimates from repeated cells.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption and text] The term 'empty LC cell' in the Fig. 3 caption is confusing; the text correctly says 'pure LC cell.' Use consistent terminology throughout.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'a ppeared' (just after Fig. 2), 'frequences' (repeated), 'the losses angle tangent,' and 'multiplicity of resistance increase is (1,3 - 2) times' should presumably read '(1.3–2) times.'
  3. [§3.A, Eq. (2b)] The parameters σ_a and σ_b are quoted in units of s⁻¹, which is not a standard conductivity unit. State explicitly whether these are σ/ε₀ values or give the conductivity values in S/m.
  4. [Title page footnotes] The corresponding-author footnote symbols appear swapped: the asterisk by Eugene A. Eliseev lists anna.n.morozovska@gmail.com, and the dagger by Anna N. Morozovska lists eugene.a.eliseev@gmail.com.
  5. [§2.A, sample preparation] The description of capillary filling at a temperature higher than the isotropic transition is clear, but the subsequent cooling/alignment procedure is not described; a sentence on how the nematic alignment was established after filling would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Model "agreement" is a fit to the same permittivity spectra it is compared against; the central I-V observation is direct and model-independent, so circularity is partial.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.A, after Eq. (2b); Figs. 6 and 7(a)-(c)]
    "The values of the parameters σa = 1 s-1, τ = 1.91 ∙ 10−6 s and σb = 5.1 ∙ 10^3 s-1 were determined from the best agreement with experimental dependences shown in Fig. 6. ... The calculated frequency dependences of the real part of the dielectric permittivity are in the quantitative agreement with experimentally measured (compare Fig. 6(a) with Fig. 7(a))."

    The Fig. 6 spectra serve as both the fitting target and the comparison target. σb and τ are selected for best agreement with Fig. 6, so the Fig. 7 curves are a restatement of that fit rather than an independent prediction; the reported quantitative agreement therefore adds no independent confirmation of the model. The paper does not use this fitted permittivity calculation to derive the current-voltage or capacitance-loop trends, so the circularity is confined to the theoretical validation and is not load-bearing for the central experimental observation.

full rationale

The experimental claim that pure 5CB cells carry more current and show a wider capacitance loop than 0.5-1 wt.% BTO cells is derived directly from measured I-V and C-V curves, not from the theoretical model. The only reduction-like step is in Section 3: parameters σa, τ, σb are explicitly fitted to the Fig. 6 permittivity and loss data, and then Fig. 7 is presented as agreeing with Fig. 6. That agreement is by construction and should not be read as a prediction. The self-citation for Eq. (2a) is minor because the equation itself is displayed and is a small-μ expansion of the standard EMA Eq. (1), so it is not a load-bearing unverified input. Cell-thickness differences and single-cell sampling are correctness/robustness concerns, not circularity. Overall score 4: one model-validation step reduces to fitting, but the central NP-induced ionic-transport observation remains independent experimental content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative model introduces three fitted parameters (sigma_a, sigma_b, tau) and relies on standard EMA plus domain assumptions about isotropy and particle shape. The proposed screening-charge mechanism is an ad hoc explanatory assumption, not a derived result, and no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • sigma_a (BTO NP conductivity) = 1 s^-1
    Chosen for best agreement with experimental frequency dependences in Fig. 6, Section 3A.
  • sigma_b (5CB conductivity) = 5.1e3 s^-1
    Fitted to match the frequency dependence of permittivity and loss tangent in Fig. 6.
  • tau (LC relaxation time) = 1.91e-6 s
    Fitted to reproduce the loss minimum near 20 kHz; the paper states it was determined for best agreement.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Effective medium approximation (EMA) Eq. (1) and its linearized form Eq. (2a) describe the dielectric response of the NP-LC mixture.
    Invoked in Section 3A; based on Carr et al. and prior work by the authors (Ref. [34]).
  • domain assumption The LC matrix can be treated as an isotropic dielectric with Debye-type complex permittivity Eq. (2b), ignoring nematic anisotropy for the EMA calculation.
    Section 3A, Eq. (2b); the paper acknowledges anisotropy is rather strong in LCs but proceeds with an isotropic formula.
  • domain assumption BTO NPs are spherical (depolarization factor n_a = 0.33), randomly distributed, with small volume fraction mu less than 0.01, and the external field is along a principal axis.
    Section 3A; TEM shows roughly spherical shapes but with size spread 17 to 47 nm, and experimental fields are not along a single principal axis for all particles.
  • ad hoc to paper The dominant physical mechanism for the DC current reduction is polarized ionic-electronic screening charges on the NPs affecting ionic transport.
    Proposed in Abstract, Section 2 and Conclusions, but not modeled or directly measured in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferroelectric Nanoparticles in Liquid Crystals: The Role of Ionic Transport at Small Concentrations of the Nanoparticles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2DGI43IC

@misc{pith2026241114118,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferroelectric Nanoparticles in Liquid Crystals: The Role of Ionic Transport at Small Concentrations of the Nanoparticles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2DGI43IC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14118}
}
read the original abstract

We reveal the visible influence of the ultra-small concentrations (1 wt.% or less) of the BaTiO3 nanoparticles (average size 24 nm) on the current-voltage characteristics and capacitance of the dielectric liquid crystal (LC) 5CB. The pure LC cell demonstrates higher current (and thus smaller resistance) than the LC cells filled with a very small concentration (0.5-1) wt.% of BTO nanoparticles. The same trend is observed for the charge-voltage characteristics: the capacitance loop is the widest for the pure LC cell and becomes noticeably thinner in the presence of (0.5-1) wt.% of BaTiO3 nanoparticles. This seems counterintuitive, because 1 wt.% of ferroelectric nanoparticles very slightly modify the effective dielectric response and should not influence on the director distribution and elastic properties of the LC. We conclude that a possible physical reason of this observation is the influence of the ionic-electronic screening charges, which cover the ferroelectric nanoparticles and become polarized in the external field, on the ionic transport in the LC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14118 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Current-voltage characteristics of 3 LC cells with different content of BTO NPs measured at the room temperature (300 K). Black loop: the cell with a pure LC 5 CB (thickness 20 μm, sample 1), red loop: the LC cell with 0.5 wt.% BTO NPs (thickness 20.7 μm, sample 2), green loop: the LC cell with 1.0 wt.% BTO NPs (thickness 20.6 μm, sample 3). -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -2 -1 0 1 2 Current, A Voltage bias, V [PITH_FULL_I… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. The dependence of the ratio C/C0 (C is the capacitance, C0 is a zero-bias capacitance) vs. the bias voltage of the LC cell with BTO NPs measured at the room temperature (300 K). Black circles correspond to the cell with a pure LC 5CB (thickness 20 μm, sample 1), red squares [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reznikov, O

    Y. Reznikov, O. Buchnev, O. Tereshchenko, V. Reshetnyak, A. Glushchenko, and J. West. Ferroelectric nematic suspension. Applied Physics Letters. 2003. 82. №12. P. 1917-1919. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1560871

    doi:10.1063/1.1560871 2003

  2. [2]

    Atkuri, G

    H. Atkuri, G. Cook, D. R. Evans, C. I. Cheon, A. Glushchenko, V. Reshetnyak, Yu. Reznikov, J. West, and K. Zhang. Preparation of ferroelectric nanoparticles for their use in liquid crystalline colloids. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics. 2009. 11. № 2. 024006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024006

    doi:10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024006 2009

  3. [3]

    Kurochkin, H

    O. Kurochkin, H. Atkuri, O. Buchnev, A. Glushchenko, O. Grabar, R. Karapinar, V. Reshetnyak, J. West, and Yu Reznikov. Nano-colloids of Sn2P2S6 in nematic liquid crystal pentyl- cianobiphenile. Condensed Matter Physics. 2010. 13. №. 3. P. 33701:1-9. https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.13.33701

    doi:10.5488/cmp.13.33701 2010

  4. [4]

    Caruntu and T

    D. Caruntu and T. Rostamzadeh and T. Costanzo and S. S. Parizi and G. Caruntu. Solvothermal synthesis and controlled self-assembly of monodisperse titanium-based perovskite colloidal nanocrystals, Nanoscale. 2015. 7. № 30. P. 12955. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00737B

    doi:10.1039/c5nr00737b 2015

  5. [5]

    Nayak, T

    S. Nayak, T. K. Chaki, D. Khastgir. Spherical ferroelectric PbZr0. 52Ti0. 48O3 nanoparticles with high permittivity: Switchable dielectric phase transition with temperature. Ceramics International. 2016. 42. P. 14490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.056

    doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.056 2016

  6. [6]

    Cook, A.V

    G. Cook, A.V. Glushchenko, V. Reshetnyak, A. T. Griffith, M. A. Saleh, and D. R. Evans, Nanoparticle Doped Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Photorefractives. Opt. Exp. 2008. 16. № 6. P. 4015. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.004015

    doi:10.1364/oe.16.004015 2008

  7. [7]

    D. R. Evans, S. A. Basun, G. Cook, I. P. Pinkevych, and V. Yu. Reshetnyak. Electric field interactions and aggregation dynamics of ferroelectric nanoparticles in isotropic fluid suspensions. Phys. Rev. B. 2011. 84. № 17. P. 174111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174111

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.174111 2011

  8. [8]

    Lorenz, N

    A. Lorenz, N. Zimmermann, S. Kumar, D. R. Evans, G. Cook, and H.-S. Kitzerow. Doping the nematic liquid crystal 5CB with milled BaTiO3 nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. E. 2012. 86. P. 051704. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.051704

    doi:10.1103/physreve.86.051704 2012

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    E. S. Beh, S. A. Basun, X. Feng, I. U. Idehenre, D. R. Evans, and M. W. Kanan, Molecular Catalysis at Polarized Interfaces Created by Ferroelectric BaTiO3. Chem. Sci. 2017. 8. № 4. P

    2017

  2. [10]

    G. Cook, J. L. Barnes, S.A. Basun, D.R. Evans, R. F. Ziolo, A. Ponce, V. Yu. Reshetnyak, A. Glushchenko, and P.P. Banerjee. Harvesting single ferroelectric domain stressed nanoparticles for optical and ferroic applications, J. Appl. Phys. 2010. 108. № 6. 064309. https://doi.or...

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    S. A. Basun, G. Cook, V. Y. Reshetnyak, A. V. Glushchenko, and D. R. Evans, Dipole moment and spontaneous polarization of ferroelectric nanoparticles in a nonpolar fluid suspension. Phys. Rev. B. 2011. 84. 024105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.024105

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    Starzonek, S

    S. Starzonek, S. J. Rzoska, A. Drozd-Rzoska, K. Czupryński, and S. Kralj, Impact of ferroelectric and superparaelectric nanoparticles on phase transitions and dynamics in nematic liquid crystals. Phys. Rev. E. 2017. 96. 022705. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022705

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    Mertelj, L

    A. Mertelj, L. Cmok, M. Čopič, G. Cook, and D. R. Evans, Critical behavior of director fluctuations in suspensions of ferroelectric nanoparticles in liquid crystal at nematic to SmA phase transition, Phys. Rev. E. 2010. 85. 021705. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021705

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    Lorenz, N

    A. Lorenz, N. Zimmermann, S. Kumar, D. R. Evans, G. Cook, M.Fernández Martínez, and H.-S. Kitzerow. Doping a mixture of two smectogenic liquid crystals with barium titanate nanoparticles J. Phys. Chem. B. 2013. 117. № 3. P. 937. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp310624c

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    R. K. Shukla, C. M. Liebig, D.R. Evans, and W. Haase, Electro-optical behavior and dielectric dynamics of harvested ferroelectric LiNbO3 nanoparticles doped ferroelectric liquid crystal nanocolloids, Royal Society of Chemistry, RSC Advances. 2014. 36. 18529. https://doi.org/10...

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    I. U. Idehenre, Yu. A. Barnakov, S. A. Basun, and D. R. Evans, Spectroscopic Studies of the Effects of Mechanochemical Synthesis on BaTiO3 Nanocolloids Prepared Using High-Energy Ball- Milling. J. Appl. Phys. 2018. 124, 165501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046682

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Y. A. Barnakov, I. U. Idehenre, S. A. Basun, T. A. Tyson, and D. R. Evans, Uncovering the mystery of ferroelectricity in zero dimensional nanoparticles, Nanoscale Adv. 2019. 2. 664. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00131F

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, Y. M. Vysochanskii, L. P. Yurchenko, V. Gopalan and L.-Q. Chen. Light-Induced Transitions of Polar State and Domain Morphology in Photo-Ferroelectric Nanoparticles. Physical Review B. 2024. 109. 045434. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.045434

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Liu, S. Ghose, B. Ravel, I. U. Idehenre, Y. A. Barnakov, S. A. Basun, D. R. Evans, and T. A. Tyson. Structural Origin of Recovered Ferroelectricity in BaTiO3 Nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B. 2023. 108. 064106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064106

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Eliseev, A.N

    E.A. Eliseev, A.N. Morozovska, S.V. Kalinin, and D.R. Evans. Strain-Induced Polarization Enhancement in BaTiO3 Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Phys.Rev. B. 2024. 109. 014104. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014104

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    A. N. Morozovska, O. S. Pylypchuk, S. Ivanchenko, E. A. Eliseev, H. V. Shevliakova, L. M. Korolevich, L. P. Yurchenko, O. V. Shyrokov, N. V. Morozovsky, V. N. Poroshin, Z. Kutnjak, and V. V. Vainberg. Electrocaloric Response of the Dense Ferroelectric Nanocomposites. Ceramics ...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    M. V. Silibin, A. V. Solnyshkin, D. A. Kiselev, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, S. Gavrilov, M. D. Malinkovich, D. C. Lupascu, V. V. Shvartsman. Local ferroelectric properties in PVDF/BPZT nanocomposites: interface effect. J. Appl. Phys. 2013. 114. 144102, https://doi.org/10....

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Silibin, J

    M. Silibin, J. Belovickis, S. Svirskas; M. Ivanov, J. Banys; A. Solnyshkin, S. Gavrilov, O. Varenyk, A. Pusenkova, N. Morozovsky, V. Shvartsman, A. Morozovska. Polarization reversal in organic-inorganic ferroelectric composites: modeling and experiment. Applied Physics Letters

  16. [24]

    Technique for characterizing azimuthal anchoring of twisted nematic liquid crystals using half-leaky guided modes

    Yang FZ, Cheng HF, Gao HJ et al. Technique for characterizing azimuthal anchoring of twisted nematic liquid crystals using half-leaky guided modes. J Opt Soc Am B. 2001. 18 №7. P. 994-1002, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.18.000994

    2001 doi

  17. [25]

    HD MicroSystems Product bulletin PI2525, PI2555 and PI2574; 2012 Nov

    2012

  18. [26]

    T. C. Choy, Effective Medium Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1999. ISBN 978-0-19- 851892-1

    1999

  19. [27]

    L. D. Landau, L. P. Pitaevskii, E. M. Lifshitz Electrodynamics of continuous media. 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films,

    J. C. M. Garnett, “Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A 203, 385. 1904. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1904.0024

    1904

  21. [29]

    Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen,

    D. A. G. Bruggeman, “Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen,” Ann. Phys. 1935. 416. P. 636. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19354160705

    1935 doi

  22. [30]

    P. 475. Elsevier. (Translated by J. S. Bell, M. J. Kearsley, and J. B. Sykes)

  23. [31]

    Far-infrared properties of inhomogeneous materials

    G. L. Carr, S. Perkowitz, and D. B. Tanner. "Far-infrared properties of inhomogeneous materials."in: Infrared and millimeter waves. 13, ed. K.J. Button, Academic Press, Orlando. (1985): 171-263

    1985

  24. [32]

    Petzelt, D

    J. Petzelt, D. Nuzhnyy, V. Bovtun, D.A. Crandles. Origin of the colossal permittivity of (Nb+ In) co-doped rutile ceramics by wide-range dielectric spectroscopy. Phase Transitions. 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Simpkin, Derivation of Lichtenecker's logarithmic mixture formula from Maxwell's equations

    R. Simpkin, Derivation of Lichtenecker's logarithmic mixture formula from Maxwell's equations. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2010. 58. P. 545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2010.2040406

    2010

  26. [34]

    O. S. Pylypchuk, S. E. Ivanchenko, M. Y. Yelisieiev, A. S. Nikolenko, V. I. Styopkin, B. Pokhylko, V. Kushnir, D. O. Stetsenko, O. Bereznykov, O. V. Leschenko, E. A. Eliseev, V. N. 16 Poroshin, N. V. Morozovsky, V. V. Vainberg, and A. N. Morozovska. Anomalous Behavior of the D...

    doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hudak, I

    O. Hudak, I. Rychetsky, and J. Petzelt, Dielectric response of microcomposite ferroelectrics. Ferroelectrics. 1998. 208–209. 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150199808014891

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    S. M. Shelestiuk, V. Yu Reshetnyak, and T. J. Sluckin. Frederiks transition in ferroelectric liquid-crystal nanosuspensions. Physical Review E. 2011. 83. 041705. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.041705

    2011 doi

  29. [37]

    Rychetský, D

    I. Rychetský, D. Nuzhnyy, J. Petzelt, Giant permittivity effects from the core–shell structure modeling of the dielectric spectra. Ferroelectrics. 2020. 9. P. 569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2020.1791659

    2020

  30. [38]

    Bogi & S

    A. Bogi & S. Faetti. Elastic, dielectric and optical constants of 4'-pentyl-4-cyanobiphenyl. Liquid Crystals. 2001 28:5, 729-739, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678290010021589

    2001 doi

  31. [41]

    Al‐Zangana, M

    S. Al‐Zangana, M. Iliut, M. Turner, A. Vijayaraghavan, and I. Dierking. Properties of a thermotropic nematic liquid crystal doped with graphene oxide. Advanced Optical Materials. 2016

    2016

  32. [42]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201600351

    1541. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201600351

    doi

  33. [91]

    P. 932. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411594.2018.1501801

    2018

  34. [2015]

    107. 142907. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932661

    doi

  35. [2790]

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC05032H

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.