Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Probing the fluctuating magnetic field of Fe-triazole spin-crossover thin-layers with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By probing the $T_1$ relaxation of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers beneath Fe-triazole spin-crossover films, this paper argues that the films remain paramagnetic from 20 °C to 80 °C and that the GHz magnetic noise they emit is…

desk verdict Honest and well-executed NV relaxometry study of SCO thin films; the negative result holds, but the quantitative T1 model is a weak test because tau_c is borrowed and the data only constrain rho*tau_c/d^3. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14454 v1 pith:FC4WX6NL submitted 2024-11-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci quant-ph

Isabel Cardoso Barbosa , Tim Hochdörffer , Juliusz A. Wolny , Dennis Lönard , Stefan Johansson , Jonas Gutsche , Volker Schünemann , Artur Widera This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersT1relaxometryspin-crossovercomplexesFe-triazolefluctuatingmagneticfieldswidefieldmagnetometryHahnechoparamagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a thin layer of an Fe-triazole spin-crossover complex on a diamond surface emits a GHz-frequency fluctuating magnetic field strong enough to shorten the relaxation time of shallow nitrogen-vacancy centers, and that this shortening can be described quantitatively by the standard dipolar relaxometry model for paramagnetic Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ ions. Temperature-dependent widefield $T_1$ measurements from 20 °C to 80 °C show the complexes behaving as paramagnets over the whole range, even where Raman spectroscopy says the material should be in its low-spin state. The measured minimum $T_1$ of 0.27(1) ms sits within a factor of about 1.5 of the model prediction of 0.18 ms. If true, this establishes NV relaxometry as a room-temperature, spatially resolved probe of paramagnetic centers in molecular films, while exposing a practical limitation: residual paramagnetism in the low-spin state, plus film cracking and delamination, can mask the spin-crossover transition itself.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the standard NV relaxometry description of magnetic noise. The relaxation rate splits additively as $1/T_1 = 1/T_1' + 1/T_1^{\mathrm{SCO}}$, where the SCO contribution is $1/T_1^{\mathrm{SCO}} = 3\gamma_e^2 B_\perp^2 \tau_c / (1 + \omega_0^2 \tau_c^2)$, with $\tau_c$ the Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ electron correlation time taken as 1 ps and $\omega_0 \approx 2\pi \times 2.87\,\mathrm{GHz}$ the NV spin transition. The transverse field variance of a uniform layer of $S=2$ Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ ions is $B_\perp^2 = \rho (\mu_0 \gamma_e \hbar/4\pi)^2 [S(S+1)/3] (2 + 3\sin^2\alpha) \pi/(6 d^3)$, which scales as $1/d^3$ with $d$ the NV depth, and $\rho$ is obtained from the complexes' crystal structures. The spectral density $S(\omega) = (2/\pi) \tau_c/(1 + \omega^2 \tau_c^2)$ overlaps the NV transition frequency, which puts the iron noise in the $T_1$ detection window; a Hahn echo, sensitive to MHz rather than GHz noise, shows a weaker and spatially inverted contrast that the paper attributes to different sensitivities to Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ and Fe$^{\mathrm{III}}$.

What would settle it

Measure $T_1$ under the same film geometry with a diamagnetic analogue, such as a Zn$^{\mathrm{II}}$-triazole film of similar thickness: if the shortening persists, fluctuating Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ spins are not the main cause. In parallel, determine $\tau_c$ directly in the film (by frequency-tunable relaxometry or EPR) and recompute the predicted 0.18 ms; because the rate is linear in $\tau_c$ in the low-frequency limit, a measured value an order of magnitude different from 1 ps would move the prediction an order of magnitude away from the measured 0.27 ms.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the NV $T_1$ reduction under these Fe-triazole films is dominated by fluctuating fields from paramagnetic Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ ions with a picosecond correlation time, not by the switchable spin state of the complexes. The predicted $T_1$ of 0.18 ms for SCO I and 0.23 ms for SCO II at the 9.3 nm NV depth matches the order of magnitude of the shortest measured times, corresponding to a transverse rms field of roughly 0.19 mT. For SCO II, cycling the sample so that the high-spin fraction rises from 62% to 84% produced no resolvable additional $T_1$ shortening; the authors attribute this to temperature-independent paramagnetic centers (chain-end Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$, crystal defects, and Fe$^{\mathrm{III}}$ impurities) that already dominate the relaxometric signal. Spin-state changes appear only as non-reproducible signatures, while visible structural changes in the film dominate the local magnetic environment.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative match rests on assuming that the iron electron spins flip with a correlation time of about $10^{-12}$ seconds, a value taken from earlier bulk and solution studies rather than measured on these particular thin films; the predicted relaxation rate scales linearly with that time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NV-center $T_1$ relaxometry can quantitatively report the density and distance of paramagnetic ions in molecular films at room temperature, with roughly 2 µm spatial resolution and without cryogenics.
  • Residual paramagnetism in nominally low-spin SCO films is an intrinsic background that any NV-based readout of spin-crossover switching must account for.
  • The $1/d^3$ distance sensitivity means $T_1$ maps track film morphology (delamination, cracks, thickness variations) as strongly as they track spin state.
  • Hahn-echo $T_2$ and $T_1$ relaxometry act as complementary frequency filters, so combining them can help separate fast Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ noise from slower magnetic contributions such as those of Fe$^{\mathrm{III}}$.
  • If the model is correct, the measured $T_1$ reduction directly sets a quantitative scale for the paramagnetic ion density in the film, independent of the spin-crossover coordinate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the picosecond correlation time is correct but applies only to a subset of iron sites, then $T_1$ relaxometry may be measuring the density of defect and chain-end high-spin ions rather than the bulk spin state; comparing films with controlled chain lengths could separate these contributions.
  • A direct test would replace Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ with a diamagnetic analogue such as a Zn$^{\mathrm{II}}$-triazole film of the same geometry: full recovery of $T_1$ to the clean-diamond value would confirm the magnetic-noise model, while residual shortening would implicate structural or surface effects.
  • Applying CPMG-style sequences or tuning the NV detection window with an external magnetic field could shift sensitivity toward Fe$^{\mathrm{III}}$ and may resolve the $T_1$/$T_2$ contrast the paper leaves unexplained.
  • Because the predicted relaxation rate is linear in $\tau_c$ in the low-frequency limit, frequency-tunable relaxometry could measure the correlation time directly in the film, converting the model's main borrowed parameter into an independently measured one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports room-temperature NV-center T1 and T2 measurements on diamond chips coated with Fe-triazole spin-crossover thin films (SCO I and SCO II). Widefield T1 maps show a spatially inhomogeneous reduction of T1 relative to the clean diamond, with the pattern matching the visible film morphology; cleaning the diamond restores the long T1. Temperature cycles between 20 °C and 80 °C, including heating and cooling branches, show that any T1 change attributable to spin switching is smaller than or masked by structural changes in the film. The authors model the film as a layer of high-spin FeII ions with correlation time tau_c = 1e-12 s, obtaining predicted T1 values of 0.18 ms (SCO I) and 0.23 ms (SCO II) at the estimated NV depth of 9.3 nm, and compare these with measured values such as 0.27(1) ms for SCO I. They conclude that the complexes are paramagnetic in the investigated range, that the quantitative T1 model describes the data, and that spin-switch detection is prevented by structural reorganization of the films.

Significance. The qualitative findings are valuable: the paper demonstrates a useful application of NV relaxometry to spin-crossover thin films, including spatially resolved T1 mapping, control for the NV T1 temperature dependence by pairwise heating/cooling comparisons, complementary Raman characterization, and a Hahn-echo study. The negative result that spin switching cannot be detected is clearly stated and well supported by the data. The quantitative model, however, is not strongly validated: its prediction depends linearly on the borrowed electron correlation time and on the cube of the assumed NV depth, and the paper does not propagate these uncertainties. If the model claim is softened to a benchmark with stated caveats, the paper's main conclusions remain defensible.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV B, IV C] In the white-noise limit, omega0*tau_c = 2*pi*2.87 GHz * 1e-12 s ≈ 0.018 << 1, so Eq. (4) reduces to 1/T1^SCO ≈ 3*gamma_e^2*B_perp^2*tau_c, and the predicted T1 scales linearly with tau_c. The value tau_c = 1e-12 s is taken from Refs. [39–42], which are bulk/solution NMR studies, and no measurement in this work constrains tau_c in the drop-cast films. Consequently the factor-1.5 agreement between the predicted 0.18 ms and measured 0.27(1) ms is not a strong validation of the model; the data constrain only the combination rho*tau_c/d^3. A factor-3 change in tau_c alone moves the prediction to roughly 0.06 ms or 0.6 ms, straddling the measurement. Please propagate uncertainties in tau_c, rho, and d and explicitly state what the comparison can and cannot establish.
  2. [Sec. IV B, IV C] The model prediction also depends sensitively on the NV depth d and the ion density rho: since T1^SCO is proportional to d^3 / rho, a 20% uncertainty in d alone changes the predicted T1 by roughly a factor of 1.7, comparable to the claimed agreement factor. The manuscript notes that the crystal-structure densities are upper bounds and that the SRIM depth distribution has width 3.6 nm, but it does not quantify the resulting uncertainty on the predicted T1. Please add a sensitivity analysis or an error budget for the predicted T1 values, and adjust the wording of the quantitative-claim sentences in the abstract and Section IV A accordingly.
  3. [Sec. IV B, IV C] The inference that the LS-state SCO complexes themselves are paramagnetic, rather than the observed T1 reduction arising from FeIII impurities, terminal HS FeII ions, or surface/interface defects, is supported by spatial correlation with the film and by T1 recovery after cleaning, but not by a direct determination of the iron oxidation state or spin state in the probed film. The paper lists these alternative sources in the same paragraph, yet the abstract states without qualification that 'the complexes are paramagnetic.' Please either provide additional evidence that the dominant contribution is from FeII ions within the SCO chains or phrase the conclusion as paramagnetic species associated with the SCO layer.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III A] The text states that the MW pulse is applied 'at frequencies of ≈2866 GHz'; since the NV zero-field splitting is 2.87 GHz, this should read ≈2.866 GHz (or ≈2866 MHz).
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical spacing errors such as 'SCO Iand' and 'SCO IIwere'; please correct these during revision.
  3. [Sec. IV D] The explanation of the opposite spatial contrast between T1 and T2 maps is presented as a tentative attribution to different FeII/FeIII detection sensitivities; this is acceptable, but it would help to state explicitly that the interpretation is speculative and that alternative explanations, such as distance-dependent noise filtering, are not excluded.
  4. [Supporting Information, Fig. S12] The procedure described for separating the NV temperature effect from the SCO contribution is a good control; it would be clearer if the same method were summarized in the main text near the SCO II discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predicted T1 is computed from externally sourced tau_c and rho and compared to, not fitted against, the measured T1.

full rationale

The derivation of the predicted T1 is self-contained with respect to the measured data. Eq. (4) uses tau_c = 1e-12 s taken from Refs. [39-42], and Eq. (5) uses rho estimated from crystal structures [45,46]; neither parameter is obtained by fitting the NV relaxometry data. The measured minimum T1 = 0.27(1) ms is compared with the calculated 0.18 ms in Sec. IV B, and the discrepancy is reported rather than absorbed into a fitted parameter. The conclusion that the complexes are paramagnetic in the LS state is an inference from the observed shortening of T1 and its spatial correlation with SCO material, and the recovery to T1' = 2.80(12) ms after cleaning (Sec. II A) provides an internal control. The self-citations (Refs. [18], [47], [49], [S14]) are methodological or explanatory and are not load-bearing for the quantitative prediction: the prediction does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or an ansatz whose validity rests on the present authors' prior work. The acknowledged weakness, that omega0*tau_c << 1 makes 1/T1_SCO linear in the borrowed tau_c, is a sensitivity or external-validity concern about whether the literature tau_c transfers to these thin films, not a circularity: tau_c is not defined in terms of the measured T1, and the comparison could have falsified the model by orders of magnitude. No equation is equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claim depends on several external inputs: tau_c from literature, d from SRIM, rho from crystal structures, and alpha from geometry. None of these are fitted to the T1 data, but all carry uncertainty that is not propagated into the predicted T1 values. The paper also relies on standard relaxometry formulas and on a biexponential fitting convention from prior NV literature. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • tau_c (FeII electron correlation time) = 1e-12 s
    Taken from Refs [39-42] and used in Eq. (4). Not fitted to the T1 data, but the predicted relaxation rate is proportional to tau_c in the low-frequency limit, so it is a controlling input.
  • d (NV layer depth / ion-to-sensor distance) = 9.3 nm
    From SRIM simulation of 6 keV 14N implantation. Used as the distance between the FeII layer and the NV centers in Eq. (5); because B_perp^2 scales as 1/d^3, a few nanometers of uncertainty change the prediction substantially.
  • rho_I (SCO I FeII density) = 3.1e27 ions/m3
    Computed from the published crystal unit cell of SCO I [45]. Treated as the thin-film density and as an upper bound, with the paper noting the film may have lower density.
  • rho_II (SCO II FeII density) = 2.4e27 ions/m3
    Computed from a crystal structure similar to SCO II [46]. Treated as the thin-film density and as an upper bound.
  • alpha (mean angle between NV axis and ion vector) = 54.75 degrees
    Assumed fixed for the (100) diamond surface in Eq. (5). The SI reports numerical checks supporting the approximation for this orientation only.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard relaxometry rate model: 1/T1 = 1/T1' + 3*gamma_e^2*B_perp^2*tau_c/(1+omega0^2*tau_c^2)
    Invoked in Eq. (4) and SI Eq. (S7), following Refs [10,38,43,44]. The S=1 rate equations are not re-derived.
  • domain assumption Biexponential T1 decay with the longer component assigned to the relevant T1
    Biexponential decays are fitted with Eq. (1); the longer component is reported following Refs [2,34,36], with the short component attributed to cross-relaxation and surface NVs.
  • domain assumption Raman spin-state fractions (62% HS at RT, 84% HS after heating) apply to the NV samples
    The Raman quantification in the SI for SCO II was performed on a thicker reference layer, not on the actual NV-sensor samples, as the SI states the measured thin layers did not yield reasonable Raman spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper The temperature-independent paramagnetism is caused by terminal FeII ions, defects, or FeIII impurities
    Proposed as possible explanations in Sec. IV B. No direct spectroscopic evidence identifies which species dominates, so this is an explanatory hypothesis rather than a tested mechanism.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing the fluctuating magnetic field of Fe-triazole spin-crossover thin-layers with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FC4WX6NL

@misc{pith2026241114454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing the fluctuating magnetic field of Fe-triazole spin-crossover thin-layers with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FC4WX6NL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14454}
}
abstract

Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ spin-crossover (SCO) complexes are materials that change their magnetic properties upon temperature variation, exhibiting a thermal hysteresis. Particularly interesting for magnetic-memory applications are thin layers of SCO complexes, where practical magnetic probing techniques are required. While conventional magnetometry on SCO complexes employs cryogenic temperatures, nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers are quantum magnetometers that can operate at room temperature with high spatial resolution and magnetic-field sensitivity. In this work, we apply thin layers of Fe-triazole SCO complexes directly onto a single-crystal diamond with shallow NV centers working as magnetic sensors and probe the fluctuating magnetic field. Using temperature-dependent NV-center $T_1$ measurements and a widefield technique, we find that the complexes are paramagnetic in the investigated temperature range from 20 {\deg}C to 80 {\deg}C. We quantitatively describe the $T_1$ time by a model considering the fluctuating magnetic field of the Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ ions. We see signatures of a local change of spin state in the $T_1$ relaxometry data, but structural changes in the SCO material dominate the local magnetic environment of the NV centers. Moreover, we conduct a Hahn echo to measure the $T_2$ time, which contrasts the findings of the $T_1$ times for the SCO complexes. We attribute this to different NV detection sensitivities towards Fe$^{\mathrm{II}}$ and Fe$^{\mathrm{III}}$ of the protocols. Our results on the magnetic properties of SCO materials highlight the capabilities of the NV center as a susceptible sensor for fluctuating magnetic fields. At the same time, a spin switching of the complexes cannot be observed due to the systematic challenges when working on nanometer distances to the SCO thin layers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14454 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Spectral density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Spin + X

    At increased tempera- ture, we obtain a mean T1 = 1.95(9) ms. Cooling back to room temperature, we measure T1 = 2.62(13) ms, where the errors denote the standard deviations. We assume that the SCO complexes of rectangular shape lifted off the diamond chip after the second cooling process, caus- ing the T1 time to increase in the second cycle. We ob- serve...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Steinert, F

    S. Steinert, F. Ziem, L. T. Hall, A. Zappe, M. Schweikert, N. G¨ otz, A. Aird, G. Balasubramanian, L. Hollenberg, and J. Wrachtrup, Magnetic spin imaging under ambient conditions with sub-cellular resolution, Nat. Commun. 4, 1607 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    E. V. Levine, M. J. Turner, P. Kehayias, C. A. Hart, N. Langellier, R. Trubko, D. R. Glenn, R. R. Fu, and R. L. Walsworth, Principles and techniques of the quan- tum diamond microscope, Nanophotonics 8, 1945 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    A. Mzyk, A. Sigaeva, and R. Schirhagl, Relaxometry with Nitrogen Vacancy (NV) Centers in Diamond, Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 3572 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Sch¨ afer-Nolte, L

    E. Sch¨ afer-Nolte, L. Schlipf, M. Ternes, F. Reinhard, K. Kern, and J. Wrachtrup, Tracking temperature- dependent relaxation times of ferritin nanomagnets with a wideband quantum spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 217204 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Fujisaku, R

    T. Fujisaku, R. Tanabe, S. Onoda, R. Kubota, T. F. Segawa, F. T.-K. So, T. Ohshima, I. Hamachi, M. Shi- rakawa, and R. Igarashi, pH Nanosensor Using Electronic Spins in Diamond, ACS Nano 13, 11726 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    S. Iyer, C. Yao, O. Lazorik, P. Wang, G. Glenn, M. Mohs, Y. Shi, M. Mansour, E. Henriksen, K. Murch, S. Mukherji, and Chong, Optically-Trapped Nanodiamond-Relaxometry Detection of Nanomo- lar Paramagnetic Spins in Aqueous Environments, arXiv:2401.17372 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Perona Mart ´ ınez, A

    F. Perona Mart ´ ınez, A. C. Nusantara, M. Chipaux, S. K. Padamati, and R. Schirhagl, Nanodiamond Relaxometry- Based Detection of Free-Radical Species When Produced in Chemical Reactions in Biologically Relevant Condi- tions, ACS Sens. 5, 3862 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Cheng, Y

    H. Cheng, Y. Luo, X. Luo, C. Xue, Y. Li, G. Liu, L. Chen, Z. Chen, and Y. Chen, All-fiber quantum relaxometry for biochemical sensing based on diamond NV centers, Opt. Express 32, 29265 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    E. S. Grant, L. T. Hall, L. C. L. Hollenberg, G. McColl, and D. A. Simpson, Nonmonotonic Superparamagnetic Behavior of the Ferritin Iron Core Revealed via Quantum Spin Relaxometry, ACS Nano 17, 372 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    R. Li, T. Vedelaar, A. Mzyk, A. Morita, S. K. Padamati, and R. Schirhagl, Following Polymer Degradation with Nanodiamond Magnetometry, ACS Sens. 7, 123 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Lamichhane, R

    S. Lamichhane, R. Timalsina, C. Schultz, I. Fescenko, K. Ambal, S.-H. Liou, R. Y. Lai, and A. Laraoui, Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetic Relaxometry of Nanoclus- tered Cytochrome C Proteins, Nano Lett. 24, 873 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Lamichhane, E

    S. Lamichhane, E. C. Guevara, I. Fescenko, S.-H. Liou, R. Y. Lai, and A. Laraoui, Magnetic relaxome- try of methemoglobin by widefield nitrogen-vacancy mi- croscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 114002 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Schmid-Lorch, T

    D. Schmid-Lorch, T. H¨ aberle, F. Reinhard, A. Zappe, M. Slota, L. Bogani, A. Finkler, and J. Wrachtrup, Re- laxometry and Dephasing Imaging of Superparamagnetic Magnetite Nanoparticles Using a Single Qubit, Nano Lett. 15, 4942 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Gorrini, R

    F. Gorrini, R. Giri, C. E. Avalos, S. Tambalo, S. Man- nucci, L. Basso, N. Bazzanella, C. Dorigoni, M. Caz- zanelli, P. Marzola, A. Miotello, and A. Bifone, Fast and Sensitive Detection of Paramagnetic Species Using Cou- pled Charge and Spin Dynamics in Strongly Fluorescent Na...

    2019

  8. [16]

    Roubeau, Triazole–Based One–Dimensional Spin– Crossover Coordination Polymers, Chem

    O. Roubeau, Triazole–Based One–Dimensional Spin– Crossover Coordination Polymers, Chem. Eur. J. 18, 15230 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    G¨ utlich, Y

    P. G¨ utlich, Y. Garcia, and H. A. Goodwin, Spin crossover phenomena in Fe(II) complexes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 29, 419 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Hochd¨ orffer, J

    T. Hochd¨ orffer, J. A. Wolny, L. Scherthan, H. Auerbach, S. Sakshath, A. Omlor, S. Wolff, H.-C. Wille, I. Sergeev, and V. Sch¨ unemann, Preparation and characterization of spin crossover thin solid films, Hyperfine Interact. 240, 116 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Brooker, Spin crossover with thermal hysteresis: prac- ticalities and lessons learnt, Chem

    S. Brooker, Spin crossover with thermal hysteresis: prac- ticalities and lessons learnt, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2880 (2015). 11

    2015

  12. [20]

    B. Bao, Y. Hua, R. Wang, and D. Li, Quantum–Based Magnetic Field Sensors for Biosensing, Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2200146 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    R. W. Hogue, S. Singh, and S. Brooker, Spin crossover in discrete polynuclear iron(II) complexes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 7303 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity op- timization for NV-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Bishop-Van Horn, Z

    L. Bishop-Van Horn, Z. Cui, J. R. Kirtley, and K. A. Moler, Cryogen-free variable temperature scan- ning SQUID microscope, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 063705 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    This work employs a shallow NV layer in diamond to probe two Fe-triazole SCO complexes in thin-layer form, see Fig

    and SCO metal-organic frameworks [25] using opti- cally detected magnetic resonance (ODMR). This work employs a shallow NV layer in diamond to probe two Fe-triazole SCO complexes in thin-layer form, see Fig. 1(a). The complexes we investigate here are [Fe(Htrz) 2(trz)](BF4), t...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    L. T. Hall, J. H. Cole, C. D. Hill, and L. C. L. Hol- lenberg, Sensing of fluctuating nanoscale magnetic fields using nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 220802 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    Lamichhane, K

    S. Lamichhane, K. A. McElveen, A. Erickson, I. Fes- cenko, S. Sun, R. Timalsina, Y. Guo, S.-H. Liou, R. Y. Lai, and A. Laraoui, Nitrogen-Vacancy Magnetometry of Individual Fe-Triazole Spin Crossover Nanorods, ACS Nano 17, 8694 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    B. T. Flinn, G. A. Rance, W. J. Cull, I. Cardillo- Zallo, J. Pitcairn, M. J. Cliffe, M. W. Fay, A. J. Tyler, B. L. Weare, C. T. Stoppiello, E. S. Davies, M. L. Mather, and A. N. Khlobystov, Sensing the Spin State of Room-Temperature Switchable Cyanometallate Frame- works with ...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Kroeber, J.-P

    J. Kroeber, J.-P. Audiere, R. Claude, E. Codjovi, O. Kahn, J. G. Haasnoot, F. Groliere, C. Jay, and A. Bousseksou, Spin Transitions and Thermal Hysteresis in the Molecular-Based Materials [Fe(Htrz) 2(trz)](BF4) and [Fe(Htrz)3](BF4)2 · H2O (Htrz = 1,2,4-4H-triazole; trz = 1,2,4...

    1994

  21. [29]

    Hochd¨ orffer, Optical and deformation induced spin switching in SCO materials , Berichte aus der Physik (Shaker Verlag, D¨ uren, 2023) ISBN: 978-3-8440-8913-4

    T. Hochd¨ orffer, Optical and deformation induced spin switching in SCO materials , Berichte aus der Physik (Shaker Verlag, D¨ uren, 2023) ISBN: 978-3-8440-8913-4

    2023

  22. [30]

    Jarmola, V

    A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Temperature- and magnetic-field-dependent longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensem- bles in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Norambuena, E

    A. Norambuena, E. Mu˜ noz, H. T. Dinani, A. Jarmola, P. Maletinsky, D. Budker, and J. R. Maze, Spin-lattice relaxation of individual solid-state spins, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094304 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, SRIM (The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter), Version SRIM-2013.00 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Y. Chu, N. P. de Leon, B. J. Shields, B. Haus- mann, R. Evans, E. Togan, M. J. Burek, M. Markham, A. Stacey, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, D. J. Twitchen, M. Loncar, H. Park, P. Maletinsky, and M. D. Lukin, Co- herent optical transitions in implanted nitrogen vacancy centers, Nano ...

    2014

  26. [34]

    Appel, E

    P. Appel, E. Neu, M. Ganzhorn, A. Barfuss, M. Batzer, M. Gratz, A. Tsch¨ ope, and P. Maletinsky, Fabrication of all diamond scanning probes for nanoscale magnetome- try, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 063703 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Sasaki, Y

    K. Sasaki, Y. Monnai, S. Saijo, R. Fujita, H. Watanabe, J. Ishi-Hayase, K. M. Itoh, and E. Abe, Broadband, large- area microwave antenna for optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 053904 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    F. C. Ziem, N. S. G¨ otz, A. Zappe, S. Steinert, and J. Wrachtrup, Highly sensitive detection of physiologi- cal spins in a microfluidic device, Nano Lett. 13, 4093 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Nishimura, M

    S. Nishimura, M. Tsukamoto, K. Sasaki, and K. Kobayashi, Investigations of optical aberration on quantum diamond microscopy toward high spatial reso- lution and sensitivity, arXiv:2402.14422 [physics.optics]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    F. A. Freire-Moschovitis, R. Rizzato, A. Pershin, M. R. Schepp, R. D. Allert, L. M. Todenhagen, M. S. Brandt, A. Gali, and D. B. Bucher, The Role of Electrolytes in the Relaxation of Near-Surface Spin Defects in Diamond, ACS Nano 17, 10474 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    P. L. Stanwix, L. M. Pham, J. R. Maze, D. Le Sage, T. K. Yeung, P. Cappellaro, P. R. Hemmer, A. Ya- coby, M. D. Lukin, and R. L. Walsworth, Coherence of nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin ensembles in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 82, 201201(R) (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    de Sousa, Electron spin as a spectrometer of nu- clear spin noise and other fluctuations, arXiv preprint, arXiv:cond-mat/0610716 (2006)

    R. de Sousa, Electron spin as a spectrometer of nu- clear spin noise and other fluctuations, arXiv preprint, arXiv:cond-mat/0610716 (2006)

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ducommun, K

    Y. Ducommun, K. E. Newman, and A. E. Merbach, High- pressure oxygen-17 NMR evidence for a gradual mecha- nistic changeover from Ia to Id for water exchange on divalent octahedral metal ions going from manganese(II) to nickel(II), Inorg. Chem. 19, 3696 (1980)

    1980

  34. [42]

    Mizuno, T

    M. Mizuno, T. Iijima, and M. Suhara, Dynamical struc- ture of paramagnetic [M(H 2O)6][SiF6] (M = Fe 2+,Ni2+) crystal studied by means of 2H nuclear magnetic reso- nance, J. Condens. Matter Phys. 12, 7261 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    Bertini and C

    I. Bertini and C. Luchinat, Chapter 3 relaxation, Coord. Chem. Rev. 150, 77 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Petzold, P

    H. Petzold, P. Djomgoue, G. H¨ orner, J. M. Speck, T. R¨ uffer, and D. Schaarschmidt, (1)H NMR spectro- scopic elucidation in solution of the kinetics and thermo- dynamics of spin crossover for an exceptionally robust Fe(2+) complex, Dalton Trans. 45, 13798 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Tetienne, T

    J.-P. Tetienne, T. Hingant, L. Rondin, A. Cavaill` es, L. Mayer, G. Dantelle, T. Gacoin, J. Wrachtrup, J.- F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Spin relaxometry of single nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond nanocrystals for magnetic noise sensing, Phys. Rev. B 87, 235436 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Zhang, M

    Z. Zhang, M. Joos, D. Bluvstein, Y. Lyu, and A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, Reporter-Spin-Assisted T1 Relaxom- etry, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, L031004 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Grosjean, P

    A. Grosjean, P. N´ egrier, P. Bordet, C. Etrillard, D. Mondieig, S. Pechev, E. Lebraud, J.-F. L´ etard, and P. Guionneau, Crystal Structures and Spin Crossover in the Polymeric Material [Fe(Htrz) 2(trz)](BF4) Including Coherent–Domain Size Reduction Effects, Eur. J. Inorg. Che...

    2013

  40. [48]

    Grosjean, N

    A. Grosjean, N. Daro, B. Kauffmann, A. Kaiba, J.-F. L´ etard, and P. Guionneau, The 1-D polymeric struc- ture of the Fe(NH 2trz)3(NO3)2·nH2O (with n = 2) spin crossover compound proven by single crystal investiga- tions, Chem. Commun. 47, 12382 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Wolny, I

    J. Wolny, I. Faus, J. Marx, R. R¨ uffer, A. Chumakov, K. Schlage, H.-C. Wille, and V. Sch¨ unemann, Vibrational 12 Coupling of Nearest Neighbors in 1-D Spin Crossover Polymers of Rigid Bridging Ligands. A Nuclear Inelas- tic Scattering and DFT Study, Magnetochemistry 2, 19 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    M. M. D ˆ ırtu, A. Rotaru, D. Gillard, J. Linares, E. Cod- jovi, B. Tinant, and Y. Garcia, Prediction of the spin transition temperature in Fe(II) one-dimensional coordi- nation polymers: an anion based database, Inorg. Chem. 48, 7838 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Rackwitz, J

    S. Rackwitz, J. A. Wolny, K. Muffler, K. Achterhold, R. R¨ uffer, Y. Garcia, R. Diller, and V. Sch¨ unemann, Vibrational properties of the polymeric spin crossover (SCO) Fe(II) complexes [ {Fe(4-amino-1,2,4- triazole)3}X2]n: a nuclear inelastic scattering (NIS), Raman and DFT ...

    2012

  44. [52]

    The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter

    E. Coronado, J. R. Gal´ an-Mascar´ os, M. Monrabal- Capilla, J. Garc ´ ıa-Mart ´ ınez, and P. Pardo-Ib´ a˜ nez, Bistable Spin–Crossover Nanoparticles Showing Mag- netic Thermal Hysteresis near Room Temperature, Adv. Mater. 19, 1359 (2007). 13 SUPPOR TING INFORMA TION A. Estima...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.