Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

BMS-like algebras: canonical realisations and BRST quantisation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Weyl λ-BMS algebra admits exactly three central charges, and at their critical values its BRST cohomology is isomorphic to a twisted N=2 superconformal chiral ring, while the conformal BMS W-algebra admits no BRST complex.

desk verdict Solid paper with a real overclaim: the central-extension and BRST results are proven for integer λ only, while the abstract sells them for all real λ; still deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14866 v2 pith:FORPSZU3 submitted 2024-11-22 hep-th math.RAmath.RT

Carlos Batlle , José Figueroa-O'Farrill , Joaquim Gomis , Girish Vishwa This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.RAmath.RT MSC 17B6817B6617B5681T40
keywords BMSalgebraWeyl-BMSsuperrotationssuperdilatationscentralextensionsBRSTcohomologyN=2superconformalW-algebra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Three-dimensional BMS algebras, the asymptotic symmetries of flat spacetime at null infinity, are usually studied one at a time. This paper tries to show that they all sit in a one-parameter family: replacing the ordinary supertranslations by eigenfunctions of the Lorentz Casimir with eigenvalue $\lambda(\lambda-1)$ produces the $\lambda$-BMS, extended $\lambda$-BMS, and Weyl $\lambda$-BMS algebras, which reduce to the standard BMS, extended BMS, and Weyl-BMS algebras at $\lambda=-1$. The same Casimir construction yields an explicit realisation of the centreless Weyl $\lambda$-BMS algebra from the symplectic structure of massless Klein-Gordon fields in $2+1$ dimensions. The paper then argues that this algebra has exactly a three-parameter family of central extensions, that at critical central charges it admits a BRST complex whose cohomology is isomorphic to the chiral ring of a topologically twisted $N=2$ superconformal field theory, and that the quantum conformal BMS W-algebra -- the closest extension by special-conformal generators -- admits no BRST complex. If these claims hold, the physical-state spaces of putative Weyl-BMS strings are governed by $N=2$ superconformal data, and 'conformal BMS strings' of the usual BRST type do not exist.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object in the canonical construction is the quadratic Casimir of the Lorentz algebra $so(2,1)$, realised on the massless mass shell as the second-order operator $C_2=r^2\partial_r^2+2r\partial_r$; its eigenfunctions $\omega_n=r^{-\lambda}e^{in\varphi}$ with eigenvalue $\lambda(\lambda-1)$ span the supertranslations, and the first-order differential operators commuting with $C_2$ produce the superrotations $L_n=ie^{in\varphi}(\partial_\varphi-inr\partial_r)$ and superdilatations $D_n=e^{in\varphi}(r\partial_r+\frac12)$. The cohomological argument is carried by the Lie algebra $w_\lambda=(W\ltimes A)\ltimes I(\lambda)$: $W$ is the Witt algebra, $A$ the Laurent polynomials, and $I(\lambda)$ the one-dimensional module spanned by $(dz)^\lambda$, so that the three families of generators $L_n,D_n,P_n$ form a double semidirect product. The dimension of the central extension is pinned by Lemma 1, an injectivity statement for $H^2$ under an ideal $h$ with $[g,h]=h$, together with the known three-dimensional cohomology of the Heisenberg-Virasoro and planar Galilean conformal algebras. The no-BRST result for the W-algebra rests on a 179-term ansatz for the ghost-number-one current, 3288 equations from $[J,J]_1=0$, and the clash between critical central charges and the OPE associativity constraint.

What would settle it

Re-run the 179-term search for the conformal BMS W-algebra with an independent symbolic OPE solver over a complete ansatz; any coefficient assignment satisfying $[J,J]_1=0$ would overturn the non-existence claim, and the required critical values $c_L=80$, $c_D=-2$ would then have to satisfy the associativity constraint $c_L=-2(1-8c_D+6c_D^2)/(1+c_D)$, which currently fails by exactly 2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the centreless Weyl $\lambda$-BMS algebra, presented as the double semidirect product $w_\lambda=(W\ltimes A)\ltimes I(\lambda)$ of the Witt algebra, the Laurent polynomials, and the module of $\lambda$-densities, admits a three-dimensional universal central extension, with representative two-cocycles $\gamma_{LL}(L_n,L_m)=\frac{1}{12}n(n^2-1)\delta^0_{m+n}$, $\gamma_{LD}(L_n,D_m)=\frac12 n(n+1)\delta^0_{m+n}$, and $\gamma_{DD}(D_n,D_m)=n\delta^0_{m+n}$ (Proposition 2). It further claims that, for integer $\lambda$ and the critical central charges $c_L=6(5-2\lambda+2\lambda^2)$, $c_{TD}=2\lambda-1$, $c_D=-1$, a BRST current exists and the BRST cohomology is isomorphic, as a Batalin-Vilkovisky algebra, to the chiral ring of a topologically twisted $N=2$ superconformal field theory; the proof couples the Weyl-BMS string to a Koszul topological conformal theory and shows the embedding is quasi-isomorphic. On the negative side, the paper claims that the fully quantum conformal BMS W-algebra defined by OPEs with fields $T,D,K,P$ does not admit a BRST complex: a 179-term ansatz for the BRST current produces 3288 inconsistent equations, and the required critical values $c_L=80$, $c_D=-2$ violate the associativity constraint $c_L=-2(1-8c_D+6c_D^2)/(1+c_D)$, which instead forces $c_L=82$ when $c_D=-2$.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the conformal BMS W-algebra has no BRST complex rests on the exhaustive enumeration of all 179 possible terms in the BRST current and on the 3288 OPE equations being solved without error, because the computation is only described, not shipped; if the ansatz missed a term, the negative result could collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $\lambda=-1$, the construction recovers the ordinary BMS, extended BMS, and Weyl-BMS algebras, so the $\lambda$-family is a single framework containing all three.
  • A Weyl-BMS string exists only for the critical central charges $c_L=6(5-2\lambda+2\lambda^2)$, $c_{TD}=2\lambda-1$, $c_D=-1$; for those values the BRST cohomology is a BV algebra isomorphic to the chiral ring of a twisted $N=2$ superconformal theory.
  • Because the Koszul factor is acyclic, the isomorphism is an isomorphism of BV algebras, not just vector spaces: the Virasoro antighost zero mode provides the BV differential on both sides.
  • No Lie-algebra extension of Weyl-BMS by super-special-conformal generators exists; the only consistent conformal extension is the W-algebra, and that W-algebra has no BRST complex, so conformal BMS W-strings in the standard sense cannot be defined.
  • The small mismatch at the critical point (80 vs 82) shows the obstruction is exact and not a matter of tuning: the associativity relation between $c_L$ and $c_D$ is rigid.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the paper leaves implicit that the integer-$\lambda$ restriction of the central-extension and BRST results is probably an artefact of the module construction, since $I(\lambda)$ is an $A$-module only for $\lambda\in\mathbb{Z}$; a natural test is to find a formulation valid for non-integer $\lambda$ and recompute the cocycles there.
  • Editorial extension: the mismatch $c_L=82$ versus the critical $80$ suggests a near-miss; a modified ansatz with one additional ghost pair or a different normal-ordering convention could plausibly produce a differential, which would turn the no-BRST theorem into a statement about this particular ansatz.
  • Editorial extension: because the supertranslations are eigenfunctions of the Lorentz Casimir, the $\lambda$-labelled charges in the Klein-Gordon realisation have a natural interpretation as modes of a conformal field on the lightcone; a testable consequence is that their two-point functions should exhibit the conformal weights read off from the $T(z)P(w)$ OPE, which could be checked in free-field
  • Editorial extension: the same Koszul-tensor trick used to prove the $N=2$ quasi-isomorphism could be applied to the near-horizon algebras that realise the same $\lambda$-BMS structures (with $s=-\lambda$), offering an independent check of the conjecture that all topological conformal field theories have $N=2$ chiral rings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper defines a one-parameter family of BMS-like Lie algebras in 2+1 dimensions, the (Weyl) λ-BMS algebras, recovering standard BMS, extended BMS, and Weyl-BMS for λ=-1. It constructs a canonical realisation of the centreless Weyl λ-BMS algebra from the symplectic structure on the massless Klein-Gordon solution space, using eigenfunctions of the Lorentz Casimir. It then proves that, for integer λ, the Weyl λ-BMS algebra has a three-dimensional space of central extensions, reformulates the centrally extended algebra in terms of operator product expansions, and constructs a BRST complex for critical central charges. The BRST cohomology is shown, via an embedding into a topologically twisted N=2 superconformal algebra, to be isomorphic to the chiral ring of that N=2 algebra. For the conformal BMS W-algebra (λ=-1), the paper constructs the quantum OPE algebra and reports a computational proof that it admits no BRST complex. The central extension, OPE, and BRST results are proved for λ ∈ Z, while the abstract and introduction advertise an arbitrary real parameter λ.

Significance. If the results hold in the stated generality, the paper provides a unified description of BMS-like algebras with a canonical field-theoretic realisation, a complete central extension classification, and a new, non-trivial example of the conjecture that the BRST cohomology of any topological conformal field theory is isomorphic to the chiral ring of a twisted N=2 superconformal theory. The claimed non-existence of a BRST complex for the conformal BMS W-algebra is a striking and potentially influential negative result. The paper is largely self-contained, with explicit OPE computations and clearly stated algebraic constructions; several checks are performed with the OPEdefs package, which increases confidence where the calculations are reproducible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1.1, Proposition 2] The three-parameter central extension result, and everything downstream in Section 3 (the OPE formulation (3.12), the critical central charges (3.23), and the BRST current (3.24)), is proved only for λ ∈ Z. The proof begins with "Let λ ∈ Z and let I(λ)..." and the assertion "It is easy to check that this statement holds true for any λ ∈ Z" does not cover non-integer λ. Since the existence of exactly three central extensions is the foundation for the OPEs and the BRST construction, the advertised generality of an arbitrary real λ (stated in the abstract and in the introduction) is not established. Please either provide a proof of H²(w_λ)=3 for all real λ (or all λ outside a finite exceptional set), or explicitly restrict the claims in the abstract and introduction to λ ∈ Z.
  2. [§4.2] The non-existence of a BRST complex for the conformal BMS W-algebra is a computational result. The text describes the ansatz (179 candidate terms) and the number of equations (3288), but the notebook is not shipped, and the critical values c_L=80 and c_D=-2 are stated without derivation. Because this is a negative existence result, its validity depends on the exhaustiveness of the ansatz and the correctness of the computation. Please make the computational notebook permanently available (e.g., as supplementary material) and provide an explicit derivation of the critical central charges, especially c_D, so that the central-charge obstruction (c_L=82 vs c_L=80) can be verified without rerunning the full calculation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase "arbitrary real parameter λ" should be qualified to "λ ∈ Z" for the results of Section 3, or the proofs must be extended to all real λ; this is a direct consequence of Major Comment 1.
  2. [§3.1.1] The statement "It is easy to check that this statement holds true for any λ ∈ Z" is too terse for a central step; please provide a reference or a short argument showing that the cohomology of the algebra g in (3.9) is three-dimensional for all integer λ.
  3. [§3.3] The claim that the Koszul topological conformal algebra has trivial cohomology except in degree 0 is asserted without a reference; a standard reference for the cohomology of such βγ systems would help the reader.
  4. [§4.2] The statement that no terms with three antighosts appear because the conformal weight of any B³C⁴X term is bounded below by 2 relies implicitly on the vanishing of normal-ordered products of repeated fermionic fields; this should be stated explicitly, since the tables alone do not make the distinctness constraint obvious.
  5. [§4.2] The phrase "A notebook is available upon request" should be replaced by a permanent archive link or supplementary material, in line with standard reproducibility practices for computational results.
  6. [§3.1.3] In (3.12), the central charge in the T(z)D(w) OPE is written c_TD, while in the surrounding text and in (3.20) it is written c_TD; please standardize the notation (e.g., use c_{TD} consistently).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central extension, BRST, and N=2 cohomology results are constructed from stated inputs; the only self-citations are non-load-bearing, and the main caveat is an integer-lambda proof gap rather than circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The lambda-BMS algebra is obtained by solving the Casimir eigenvalue equation (2.18)-(2.24), not by assuming the target algebra. The three-dimensional central extension classification (Proposition 2) uses an injectivity lemma (Lemma 1) plus external cohomology computations of the planar GCA ([38]) and of g0 ([34], [27]); none of these are fitted to the paper's desired conclusion. The BRST current is an explicit ansatz (3.24)-(3.25) whose closure is checked by OPE calculation, and the critical central charges are derived from the ghost system. The N=2 chiral-ring isomorphism is established by explicitly building an N=2 algebra from the Weyl lambda-BMS BRST complex tensored with a Koszul system whose cohomology is trivial, then applying the Kunneth theorem; this is a construction, not a renaming of the conclusion. The no-BRST theorem for the conformal BMS W-algebra is a computational search over 179 candidate terms yielding 3288 equations, with the obstruction traced to an algebraic incompatibility of critical central charges; this is a reported computation, not a fit. The paper does contain self-citations ([18], [19], [26], [52]), but they are not load-bearing: [18]-[19] state the conjecture being tested, [26] supplies notation and an optional alternative construction, and [52] is an external published result. A genuine limitation is that Proposition 2 and the w_lambda reformulation are stated for integer lambda (Section 3.1.1: 'Let lambda in Z'), while the abstract advertises arbitrary real lambda; this is a proof gap in the claimed generality, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main free parameter is λ, which labels the family of algebras. The central extension parameters c_L, c_TD, c_D and the W-algebra central charge c_D are moduli of the constructions, not fitted values. The proofs rely on standard cohomology theorems for W(a,b) and planar GCA, the conformal invariance of the massless KG equation, and the correspondence between charge brackets and differential operators. The restriction to integer λ in the central extension section is an implicit domain assumption.

free parameters (3)
  • λ = real; λ=-1 recovers standard BMS/Weyl-BMS algebras
    The paper defines a one-parameter family of algebras via the Casimir eigenvalue α=-λ(λ-1); λ is an input parameter of the construction, not fitted to data, but the results depend on it.
  • central charges c_L, c_TD, c_D = arbitrary (three-parameter family)
    The centrally extended Weyl λ-BMS algebra in Section 3.1.2 has three independent 2-cocycles with parameters c_L, c_TD, c_D; they are not fitted but are the moduli of the extension.
  • c_D (W-algebra) = generic, with c_L determined by Eq. (4.4)
    In Section 4.1, the quantum conformal BMS W-algebra has a free central charge c_D, and associativity fixes c_L = -2(6c_D^2 - 8c_D + 1)/(1+c_D); the no-BRST argument evaluates at critical values c_L=80, c_D=-2.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The cohomology of the planar Galilean conformal algebra (λ=-1) is three-dimensional, and this extends to all integer λ.
    Used in Proposition 2 to bound dim H2(wλ) using Lemma 1 and the Gao-Liu-Pei result [38]; the extension to all λ∈Z is asserted without proof.
  • standard math The second cohomology of the Lie algebra g0 (Witt algebra with tensor density module) is three-dimensional, with representatives given in [34].
    Used in Proposition 2 to show dim H2(wλ) ≥ 3.
  • domain assumption The massless Klein-Gordon equation in 2+1 is conformally invariant, so the Poisson algebra of its conserved charges realizes the conformal algebra.
    The canonical realisation in Section 2 starts from the symplectic structure on the KG solution space; conformal invariance is needed for dilatations and special-conformal generators.
  • domain assumption The Poisson brackets of charges equal -i times the commutator of the associated differential operators, with no boundary contributions.
    Appendix B shows {P,Q} = -i∫ a [P̂,Q̂] a without integration by parts; this justifies working with differential operators on the mass shell.
  • domain assumption Tensor density modules I(λ) of the Witt algebra are modules over the Laurent polynomial algebra A only for integer λ; the paper restricts to λ∈Z in the algebraic formulation.
    Section 3.1.1 sets λ∈Z to define P_n = z^{n-λ}(dz)^λ as elements of a one-dimensional A-module; this is why the central extension theorem is proven only for integer λ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BMS-like algebras: canonical realisations and BRST quantisation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FORPSZU3

@misc{pith2026241114866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BMS-like algebras: canonical realisations and BRST quantisation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FORPSZU3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14866}
}
abstract

We generalise BMS algebras in three dimensions by the introduction of an arbitrary real parameter $\lambda$, recovering the standard algebras (BMS, extended BMS and Weyl-BMS) for $\lambda=-1$. We exhibit a realisation of the (centreless) Weyl $\lambda$-BMS algebra in terms of the symplectic structure on the space of solutions of the massless Klein-Gordon equation in $2+1$, using the eigenstates of the spacetime momentum operator. The quadratic Casimir of the Lorentz algebra plays an essential r\^ole in the construction. The Weyl $\lambda$-BMS algebra admits a three-parameter family of central extensions, resulting in the (centrally extended) Weyl-BMS algebra, which we reformulate in terms of operator product expansions. We construct the BRST complex of a putative Weyl-BMS string and show that the BRST cohomology is isomorphic to the chiral ring of a topologically twisted $N=2$ superconformal field theory. We also comment on the obstructions to obtaining a conformal BMS Lie algebra -- that is, one that includes in addition the special-conformal generators -- and the need to consider a W-algebra. We then construct the quantum version of this W-algebra in terms of operator product expansions. We show that this W-algebra does not admit a BRST complex.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Inconsistency in the Null Strings Literature: The Tale of an Overlooked Symmetry

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims a new local symmetry of null strings forces a third constraint, giving D−3 physical degrees of freedom.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gravi tational waves in general relativity. 7. W aves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, “ Gravi tational waves in general relativity. 7. W aves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269 (1962) 21–52 . [Page 1.]

    work page 1962

  2. [2]

    Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theo ry,

    R. Sachs, “ Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theo ry,” Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2851–2864 . [Page 1.]

    work page 1962

  3. [3]

    A Canonical realization of t he BMS algebra,

    G. Longhi and M. Materassi, “ A Canonical realization of t he BMS algebra,” J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 480–500 , arXiv:hep-th/9803128. [Pages 1 and 4.]

    arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theor y

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theor y. 3, 2017. arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th] . [Page 1.]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Symmetries of asymptotic ally flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited ,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “ Symmetries of asymptotic ally flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 111103 , arXiv:0909.2617 [gr-qc] . [Pages 1 and 7.]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Supertranslations call f or superrotations,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “ Supertranslations call f or superrotations,” PoS CNCFG2010 (2010) 010 , arXiv:1102.4632 [gr-qc] . [Page 1.]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    BMS charge algebra,

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, “ BMS charge algebra,” JHEP 12 (2011) 105 , arXiv:1106.0213 [hep-th] . [Page 1.]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Superrotat ions at spacelike infinity,

    A. Fiorucci, J. Matulich, and R. Ruzziconi, “ Superrotat ions at spacelike infinity,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 6, (2024) L061502 , arXiv:2404.02197 [hep-th] . [Page 1.]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Canonical realiza tion of ( 2+1 )-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetry,

    C. Batlle, V. Campello, and J. Gomis, “ Canonical realiza tion of ( 2+1 )-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 2, (2017) 025004 , arXiv:1703.01833 [hep-th] . [Pages 1, 4, and 7.]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Quantum BMS transf ormations in conformally flat space-times and holography,

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, and F. Rosso, “ Quantum BMS transf ormations in conformally flat space-times and holography,” JHEP 12 (2020) 102 , arXiv:2008.05483 [hep-th] . [Page 1.]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A canonical reali zation of the W eyl BMS symmetry,

    C. Batlle, V. Campello, and J. Gomis, “ A canonical reali zation of the W eyl BMS symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135920 , arXiv:2008.10290 [hep-th] . [Pages 1, 8, and 9.]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Superconformal Bondi-Metzner-Sachs Algebra in Three Dimensions,

    O. Fuentealba, H. A. González, A. Pérez, D. Tempo, and R. Troncoso, “ Superconformal Bondi-Metzner-Sachs Algebra in Three Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 9, (2021) 091602 , arXiv:2011.08197 [hep-th] . [Pages 1, 2, 8, and 15.]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    The W eyl BMS group and Einstein’s equations,

    L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti, and S. Speziale, “ The W eyl BMS group and Einstein’s equations,” JHEP 07 (2021) 170 , arXiv:2104.05793 [hep-th] . [Pages 1, 8, and 11.]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    The Λ-BMS4 group of dS 4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4,

    G. Compère, A. Fiorucci, and R. Ruzziconi, “ The Λ-BMS4 group of dS 4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 no. 19, (2019) 195017 , arXiv:1905.00971 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 38, 229501 (2021)]. [Page 2.]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Conformal C arroll groups and BMS symmetry,

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, “ Conformal C arroll groups and BMS symmetry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 092001 , arXiv:1402.5894 [gr-qc] . [Page 2.]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    G eometry and BMS Lie algebras of spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, R. Grassie, and S. Prohazka, “ G eometry and BMS Lie algebras of spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes,” JHEP 08 (2019) 119 , arXiv:1905.00034 [hep-th] . [Page 2.]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,

    D. Grumiller, A. Pérez, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Tronco so, and C. Zwikel, “ Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 4, (2020) 041601 , arXiv:1908.09833 [hep-th] . [Pages 2 and 18.]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Are all TCFT’s obtained by t wisting N=2 SCFT’s?,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “ Are all TCFT’s obtained by t wisting N=2 SCFT’s?,” in ICTP Workshop on Strings, Gravity and Related Topics . 7, 1995. arXiv:hep-th/9507024. [Pages 2 and 13.]

    1995 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Untwisting topological field theories,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “ Untwisting topological field theories,” in Workshop on Gauge Theories, Applied Supersymmetry and Quantum Gravity , pp. 255–262. 11, 1996. arXiv:hep-th/9611018. [Pages 2 and 13.]

    1996 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Lectures on celestial amplitudes,

    S. Pasterski, “ Lectures on celestial amplitudes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 12, (2021) 1062 , arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th] . [Page 3.]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Celestial holography: An asymptotic symme try perspective,

    L. Donnay, “ Celestial holography: An asymptotic symme try perspective,” Phys. Rept. 1073 (2024) 1–41 , arXiv:2310.12922 [hep-th] . [Page 3.]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    BMS in higher space-time dimensions a nd Non-relativistic BMS,

    D. G. Delmastro, “ BMS in higher space-time dimensions a nd Non-relativistic BMS,” Master’s thesis, Barcelona U.,

  15. [23]

    A note on the representations of SO (1, d + 1),

    Z. Sun, “ A note on the representations of SO (1, d + 1),” arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th] . [Page 4.]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Polyharmonic Gre en functions and nonlocal Bondi-Metzner-Sachs transformations of a free scalar field,

    C. Batlle, V. Campello, and J. Gomis, “ Polyharmonic Gre en functions and nonlocal Bondi-Metzner-Sachs transformations of a free scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 025010 , arXiv:2207.12299 [hep-th] . [Page 4.]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Interacting Conformal Carrollian Theories: Cues from Electrodynamics,

    K. Banerjee, R. Basu, A. Mehra, A. Mohan, and A. Sharma, “ Interacting Conformal Carrollian Theories: Cues from Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 10, (2021) 105001 , arXiv:2008.02829 [hep-th] . [Pages 4 and 18.]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    The BRST qua ntisation of chiral BMS-like field theories,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and G. S. Vishwa, “ The BRST qua ntisation of chiral BMS-like field theories,” arXiv:2407.12778 [hep-th] . [Pages 7 and 12.]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Low-dimensional cohomolo gy groups of the Lie algebras W(a, b),

    S. Gao, C. Jiang, and Y. Pei, “Low-dimensional cohomolo gy groups of the Lie algebras W(a, b),” Comm. Algebra 39 no. 2, (2011) 397–423 . [Pages 7 and 10.]

    2011

  20. [28]

    W(0,b) algebra and the dual theory of 3D asymptotically flat higher spin gravity,

    N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharjee, S. Biswas, A. Mitra, and D. Mukherjee, “ W(0,b) algebra and the dual theory of 3D asymptotically flat higher spin gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 6, (2024) 066002 , arXiv:2308.11583 [hep-th] . [Page 7.]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Symmetries and cov ering maps for the minimal tension string on AdS 3 × S3 × T4,

    N. M. McStay and R. A. Reid-Edwards, “ Symmetries and cov ering maps for the minimal tension string on AdS 3 × S3 × T4,” JHEP 04 (2024) 048 , arXiv:2306.16280 [hep-th] . [Page 7.]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    On Rigidity of 3d Asymptotic Symmetry Algebras,

    A. Farahmand Parsa, H. R. Safari, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabba ri, “ On Rigidity of 3d Asymptotic Symmetry Algebras,” JHEP 03 (2019) 143 , arXiv:1809.08209 [hep-th] . [Page 7.]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Annihilators of tensor dens ity modules,

    C. H. Conley and C. Martin, “Annihilators of tensor dens ity modules,” J. Algebra 312 no. 1, (2007) 495–526 . [Pages 7 and 18.]

    2007

  24. [32]

    V. M. Campello, Canonical realizations of Bondi-Metzner-Sachs–like symme tries in field theory . PhD thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2024. https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/416264. [Page 8.]

    2024

  25. [33]

    Differential operator algebras on compact Riemann surfaces,

    M. Schlichenmaier, “Differential operator algebras on compact Riemann surfaces,” in Generalized symmetries in physics (Clausthal, 1993) , pp. 425–434. W orld Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1994. [Page 9.]

    1993

  26. [34]

    M oduli spaces of curves and representation theory,

    E. Arbarello, C. De Concini, V. G. Kac, and C. Procesi, “M oduli spaces of curves and representation theory,” Comm. Math. Phys. 117 no. 1, (1988) 1–36. [Pages 9 and 10.] BMS-LIKE ALGEBRAS: CANONICAL REALISATIONS AND BRST QUANTI SATION 21

    1988

  27. [35]

    Simple restricted modules o ver the Heisenberg-Virasoro algebra as VOA modules,

    H. Tan, Y. Yao, and K. Zhao, “ Simple restricted modules o ver the Heisenberg-Virasoro algebra as VOA modules,”

  28. [36]

    Nappi-witten vertex op erator algebra via inverse quantum hamiltonian reduction,

    D. Adamovic and A. Babichenko, “Nappi-witten vertex op erator algebra via inverse quantum hamiltonian reduction, ”

  29. [37]

    D. B. Fuks, Cohomology of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras . Contemporary Soviet Mathematics. Consultants Bureau, New York, 1986. Translated from the Russian by A. B. S osinski˘i. [Page 10.]

    1986

  30. [38]

    Structure of the planar Galil ean conformal algebra,

    S. Gao, D. Liu, and Y. Pei, “Structure of the planar Galil ean conformal algebra,” Rep. Math. Phys. 78 no. 1, (2016) 107–122 . [Pages 10 and 11.]

    2016

  31. [39]

    A Mathematica package for computing op erator product expansions,

    K. Thielemans, “ A Mathematica package for computing op erator product expansions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 2 (1991) 787–798 . [Pages 11 and 16.]

    1991

  32. [40]

    A Mathematica package for computing op erator product expansions,

    K. Thielemans, “ A Mathematica package for computing op erator product expansions,” in 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems for High-energy and Nuclear Physics

  33. [41]

    Thielemans, An Algorithmic approach to operator product expansions, W a lgebras and W strings

    K. Thielemans, An Algorithmic approach to operator product expansions, W a lgebras and W strings . PhD thesis, Leuven U., 1994. arXiv:hep-th/9506159. [Pages 11 and 16.]

    1994 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Semi-in finite cohomology and string theory,

    I. B. Frenkel, H. Garland, and G. J. Zuckerman, “Semi-in finite cohomology and string theory,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83 no. 22, (1986) 8442–8446 . [Page 12.]

    1986

  35. [43]

    A characterization of the differential in sem i-infinite cohomology,

    F. Akman, “A characterization of the differential in sem i-infinite cohomology,” J. Algebra 162 no. 1, (1993) 194–209 . [Page 12.]

    1993

  36. [44]

    New perspectives on the B RST algebraic structure of string theory,

    B. H. Lian and G. J. Zuckerman, “ New perspectives on the B RST algebraic structure of string theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 154 (1993) 613–646 , arXiv:hep-th/9211072. [Page 13.]

    1993 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Algebraic structures and di fferential geometry in 2-D string theory,

    E. Witten and B. Zwiebach, “ Algebraic structures and di fferential geometry in 2-D string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 377 (1992) 55–112 , arXiv:hep-th/9201056. [Page 13.]

    1992 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Topological Quantum Field Theory,

    E. Witten, “ Topological Quantum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353 . [Page 13.]

    1988

  39. [47]

    N=2 superconformal models as topological field theories,

    T. Eguchi and S.-K. Yang, “ N=2 superconformal models as topological field theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 1693–1701 . [Page 13.]

    1990

  40. [48]

    N=2 string as a topological conf ormal theory,

    J. Gomis and H. Suzuki, “ N=2 string as a topological conf ormal theory,” Phys. Lett. B 278 (1992) 266–270 , arXiv:hep-th/9111059. [Page 13.]

    1992 arXiv

  41. [49]

    On the BRST operator structure o f the N=2 string,

    A. Giveon and M. Rocek, “ On the BRST operator structure o f the N=2 string,” Nucl. Phys. B 400 (1993) 145–160 , arXiv:hep-th/9302049. [Page 13.]

    1993 arXiv

  42. [50]

    On the Uniqueness of string th eory,

    N. Berkovits and C. Vafa, “ On the Uniqueness of string th eory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994) 653–664 , arXiv:hep-th/9310170. [Page 13.]

    1994 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The N=1 superstring as a topological field th eory,

    N. Marcus, “ The N=1 superstring as a topological field th eory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1071–1074 , arXiv:hep-th/9405039. [Page 13.]

    1994 arXiv

  44. [52]

    N=2 structures in all strin g theories,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “ N=2 structures in all strin g theories,” J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997) 5559–5575 , arXiv:hep-th/9507145. [Pages 13 and 15.]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Affine algebras, N=2 superco nformal algebras, and gauged WZNW models,

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “ Affine algebras, N=2 superco nformal algebras, and gauged WZNW models,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 496–502 , arXiv:hep-th/9306164. [Page 14.]

    1993 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Manin triples and N=2 superconformal field theory,

    E. Getzler, “ Manin triples and N=2 superconformal field theory,” arXiv:hep-th/9307041. [Page 14.]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    On some generalizations of Batalin-Vilkovi sky algebras,

    F. Akman, “On some generalizations of Batalin-Vilkovi sky algebras,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra 120 no. 2, (1997) 105–141 . [Page 15.]

    1997

  48. [56]

    Lie algebras and equa tions of Korteweg-de Vries type,

    V. G. Drinfel’d and V. V. Sokolov, “Lie algebras and equa tions of Korteweg-de Vries type,” in Current problems in mathematics, Vol. 24 , Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, pp. 81–180. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vsesoy uz. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, 1984. [Page 17.]

    1984

  49. [57]

    The Relation between quantum W al gebras and Lie algebras,

    J. de Boer and T. Tjin, “ The Relation between quantum W al gebras and Lie algebras,” Commun. Math. Phys. 160 (1994) 317–332 , arXiv:hep-th/9302006. [Page 17.]

    1994 arXiv

  50. [58]

    On the classification of qu antum W algebras,

    P. Bowcock and G. M. T. W atts, “ On the classification of qu antum W algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B 379 (1992) 63–95 , arXiv:hep-th/9111062. [Page 18.]

    1992 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Infinite Additional Symmetries i n Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “ Infinite Additional Symmetries i n Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,” Theor. Math. Phys. 65 (1985) 1205–1213 . [Page 18.]

    1985

  52. [60]

    BRS Analysis of Zamolodchikov’s Spi n Two and Three Current Algebra,

    J. Thierry-Mieg, “ BRS Analysis of Zamolodchikov’s Spi n Two and Three Current Algebra,” Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987) 368 . [Page 18.]

    1987

  53. [61]

    The W(3) alg ebra: Modules, semiinfinite cohomology and BV algebras,

    P. Bouwknegt, J. G. McCarthy, and K. Pilch, “ The W(3) alg ebra: Modules, semiinfinite cohomology and BV algebras,” arXiv:hep-th/9509119. [Page 18.]

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Semi-infinite cohomology and the linkage p rinciple for W-algebras,

    G. Dhillon, “Semi-infinite cohomology and the linkage p rinciple for W-algebras,” Adv. Math. 381 (2021) Paper No. 107625, 62 . [Page 18.]

    2021

  55. [63]

    Semi-infinite homology of Lie, Kac-Moody and Virasor o algebras,

    B. L. Fe ˘igin, “Semi-infinite homology of Lie, Kac-Moody and Virasor o algebras,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 39 no. 2(236), (1984) 195–196. [Page 18.]

    1984

  56. [64]

    Conformal field theories via Hamiltoni an reduction,

    M. Bershadsky, “ Conformal field theories via Hamiltoni an reduction,” Commun. Math. Phys. 139 (1991) 71–82 . [Page 18.]

    1991

  57. [65]

    All chiral W-algebra extensions of so (2, 3),

    N. Gupta and N. V. Suryanarayana, “ All chiral W-algebra extensions of so (2, 3),” JHEP 08 (2024) 137 , arXiv:2304.14938 [hep-th] . [Page 18.]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The BRST quantization of the nonlinear W B(2 ) and W(4) algebras,

    C.-J. Zhu, “ The BRST quantization of the nonlinear W B(2 ) and W(4) algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B 418 (1994) 379–399 , arXiv:hep-th/9306026. [Page 18.]

    1994 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Ambitwistor strings and the sc attering equations,

    L. Mason and D. Skinner, “ Ambitwistor strings and the sc attering equations,” JHEP 07 (2014) 048 , arXiv:1311.2564 [hep-th] . [Page 18.] 22 BATLLE, FIGUEROA-O’F ARRILL, GOMIS, AND VISHW A (JMF,GSV) Maxwell Institute and School of Mathematics, The Universit y of Edinburgh, Jam...

    2014 arXiv

  60. [2024]

    [Page 9.]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02093. [Page 9.]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.