Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Stability Analysis of Circular Geodesics in Dyonic Dilatonic Black Hole Spacetimes

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that in a four-dimensional dyonic-like dilatonic black hole spacetime—with two scalar fields and two vector fields, parameterized by $a\in(0,2)$ and $p>0$—the innermost stable circular orbit is unique, always lies…

desk verdict The ISCO uniqueness theorem is plausible but not yet rigorously proven: the Lemma in Appendix A is supported by graphical analysis and contains an arithmetic slip, so the stability partition needs a proof fix before the central claim is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15006 v1 pith:KETIFHKO submitted 2024-11-22 gr-qc

Kuantay Boshkayev , Gulnaz Takey , Vladimir Ivashchuk , Algis Malybayev , Guliya Nurbakova , Ainur Urazalina This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C1083C57 PACS 04.20.-q04.70.Bw
keywords dyonicdilatonicblackholescirculargeodesicsinnermoststableorbitISCOeffectivepotentialphotonspheremasterequationstabilityoforbits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies circular orbits of neutral test particles around a four-dimensional dyonic-like dilatonic black hole, a spacetime with two scalar fields and two vector fields characterized by a dimensionless parameter $a\in(0,2)$ and a charge parameter $p>0$. The authors derive the effective potential for timelike geodesics and show that the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) is encoded in the root of a fixed quartic polynomial $F(x)=0$ in the dimensionless radius $x=R/(2\mu)$. They prove that for every $a$ and $p$ this quartic has exactly one root $x_*>1$, that this root always lies outside the photon-sphere radius $x_0$, and hence that all circular orbits with $R>R_{\rm ISCO}$ are stable while those between the photon sphere and $R_{\rm ISCO}$ are unstable. If correct, the result fixes the inner edge of accretion disks in this family of spacetimes and gives a quantitative way to distinguish these dilatonic black holes from Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström black holes through their ISCO radii and radiation efficiencies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quartic polynomial $F(x)$ extracted from the second derivative of the effective potential; specifically, $\partial^2 V^2/\partial R^2$ is proportional to $F(x)$ divided by a positive factor $\Delta_1$, so the sign of $F(x)$ decides stability. The identity $dv/dx \propto F(x)/\Delta_0^2$, relating the derivative of the angular-momentum-squared function to $F$, shows that the ISCO radius is the unique zero of $F$ beyond the photon-sphere root $x_0$. The fourth-order master equation $F(x)=0$ (Eq. (3.25)) is the single equation whose unique root $x_*>x_0>1$ carries the entire result; explicit closed-form root expressions are given in Appendix B.

What would settle it

Compute $F'(x)$ on a fine grid of $(a,p)$ in $(0,2)\times(0,\infty)$; the uniqueness claim fails if any grid point yields two distinct roots of $F'(x)$ greater than 1. Equivalently, directly search for two distinct roots $x>1$ of the quartic $F(x)=0$ for any allowed pair $(a,p)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a uniqueness theorem for the innermost stable circular orbit. Writing the radius as $x=R/(2\mu)$, the paper shows that the stability boundary—the inflection point of the effective potential—is equivalent to a quartic equation $F(x)=0$ whose coefficients depend on $a$ and $p$. Proposition 1 asserts that this quartic has one and only one root $x_*=x_*(a,p)$ with $x_*>1$ for all $0<a<2$ and $p>0$, and that this root satisfies $x_*>x_0$, where $x_0$ is the photon-sphere radius. Proposition 2 then concludes that timelike circular orbits with $R>R_{\rm ISCO}=2\mu x_*$ are stable and those with $R_0<R<R_{\rm ISCO}$ are unstable. The proof relies on a lemma stating that the cubic $F'(x)$ has at most one root in $(1,\infty)$, verified by a combination of algebraic bounds and graphical analysis.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of uniqueness in Proposition 1 depends on a lemma asserting that the cubic $F'(x)$ has at most one root on $(1,\infty)$, and that lemma's proof relies on graphical inspection rather than closed-form algebra for inequalities such as $z_1(a)>3$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $0<a<2$ and $p>0$, the ISCO radius is unique and always larger than the photon-sphere radius, so the boundary between stable and unstable circular orbits is sharp and well defined.
  • The ISCO radius interpolates between the Schwarzschild value at $a=0$ and the Reissner–Nordström value at $a=2$, with the matter-to-radiation conversion efficiency increasing monotonically with $a$ between $5.72\%$ and $8.14\%$.
  • In the large-charge limit, $R_{\rm ISCO}$ grows linearly with $p$ for $1<a<2$ according to $R_{\rm ISCO}\sim h(a)P$, whereas for $0<a<1$ it saturates at a finite value $x_\infty(a)\,2\mu$.
  • The explicit quartic solution $x_4$ in Appendix B provides a closed-form expression for $R_{\rm ISCO}$ that can be used to compute accretion-disk inner edges and eikonal quasinormal-mode frequencies in this spacetime.
  • The stability result directly constrains the allowed radii of circular orbits, implying that any stable circular orbit must satisfy $R>R_{\rm ISCO}$, a condition that can be checked observationally through disk emission profiles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct corollary the authors do not spell out is that the photon sphere always lies strictly inside the stable-orbit region, so no stable circular orbit exists at or below $R_0$; this mirrors a broader pattern for asymptotically flat black holes whose matter satisfies the strong energy condition.
  • The uniqueness proof could be made fully analytic by replacing the 'elementary graphical analysis' in Appendix A with explicit algebraic inequalities, which would eliminate the only numerical step in the argument.
  • Because the metric depends on $a$ and $p$ through simple powers, the same master-equation technique should extend to test particles carrying two electric color charges, the generalization the authors propose as future work.
  • Observed ISCO radii, combined with the paper's efficiency curves, could in principle constrain the parameters $a$, $Q$, and $M$ of a candidate dilatonic black hole, a test that becomes sharper as disk-margin measurements improve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes circular timelike and null geodesics in a non-extreme dyonic-like dilatonic black hole spacetime with two scalar fields and two Abelian vector fields. The metric depends on a parameter a (0<a<2) and extremality parameter µ plus charge parameter P. The authors derive the effective potential, energy, and angular momentum for circular orbits, reduce the ISCO condition to a fourth-order polynomial equation F(x)=0, and state two propositions: Proposition 1 claims this polynomial has exactly one root x*>1, which lies above the photon-sphere radius x0, and Proposition 2 claims circular timelike geodesics are stable for R>Risco and unstable for R0<R<Risco. The proof of Proposition 1 is delegated to Appendix A, whose central Lemma asserts that the cubic F'(x) has at most one root in (1,∞). The paper also gives explicit ISCO formulas for selected a values, asymptotic behaviors for large p, and efficiency plots.

Significance. If the uniqueness and ordering claims are rigorously established, the paper provides a clean and complete stability characterization for circular geodesics in this whole family of dilatonic black holes, reducing the problem to a single quartic equation and offering explicit analytic formulas for several special cases. The geodesic derivation is standard, the reduction to the Schwarzschild and Reissner–Nordström limits is checked, and the numerical and asymptotic results are consistent with the stated conclusions. The main advertised novelty, however, is the mathematical proof of uniqueness of the ISCO for all 0<a<2 and p>0, and that proof is currently incomplete because of the gaps identified below. Thus the paper is potentially valuable but, in its present form, does not fully establish its central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (1.19)] The bound in Eq. (1.19) is arithmetically incorrect: 17/27·5 − 13/9 − 2 = −8/27, not +5/27. Since this inequality is used to conclude v>0, and v>0 (together with z>0) is the basis for proving F''(x)>0 in case (b) of the Lemma, the proof of the Lemma fails as written. This is load-bearing: the Lemma is the only non-numerical justification for the uniqueness of the root x*>1, which in turn determines the stability partition in Proposition 2. The authors should repair this estimate or replace it with a correct analytic proof.
  2. [Appendix A, Lemma proof, Eqs. (1.20)–(1.23)] The Lemma's proof relies repeatedly on 'elementary graphical analysis' and on assertions that certain functions are 'readily obtained from graphical analysis' (e.g., z1(a)>3 and zb(a)>12 in Eqs. (1.20)–(1.23)). For a formal proof of a claim over a continuous parameter range, graphical inspection is not a rigorous substitute for an analytic or interval-verified argument. Since the Lemma is the backbone of Proposition 1, the paper should either supply explicit analytic inequalities or provide a computer-assisted proof with rigorous error control for (1.20) and (1.23).
  3. [Appendix A, Proposition 1 proof, root-configuration enumeration] The proof of uniqueness in Proposition 1 rests on an 'elementary graphical analysis' enumeration of possible root configurations of the quartic F(x) (cases i–iii). The enumeration is plausible but not justified in the text; in particular, the possibility of a double root that is also a stationary point of F' is not explicitly addressed. Since the subsequent contradiction uses Rolle's theorem, the authors should spell out why the three listed cases exhaust all possibilities after a double root is handled, or replace this step with a direct argument.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Appendix A, proof of Proposition 1] In the sentence 'Now let us prove that x∗ > x0, where x0 is defined in equation (4) of the question,' the reference should be to Eq. (3.17) or a similar numbered equation in the main text, not 'equation (4) of the question.'
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (3.23)] The denominator in Eq. (3.23) is written as Δ1, whereas Eqs. (3.18) and (3.19) contain Δ1^2. Please check whether this is a typographical omission or whether the different degree is intentional, and clarify the derivation.
  3. [Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions] The axis label in the figures is rendered as 'R/(2m)' although the text and captions use µ; please ensure the notation is consistent throughout.
  4. [Section 2, text after Eq. (2.6)] In the sentence 'Q2 are the (color) magnetic charge,' the verb should agree with the singular noun 'charge' (i.e., 'Q2 is the (color) magnetic charge').
  5. [Section 2, Table I heading] The phrase 'Table I presents µ and P...' is grammatically awkward; consider 'Table I gives µ and P in terms of M and Q...'.
  6. [Section 4, Eq. (4.2)–(4.3)] The explicit expression for xisco at a=1/4 is very long and opaque; it would help readers if the authors verified it numerically for a few representative values of p and stated how the physical root x4 is selected from the quartic solution in Appendix B.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the geodesic derivation is self-contained; self-citations supply the spacetime input but do not determine the ISCO result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a mathematical derivation: starting from the metric (2.4), taken from Ref. [23], and the standard geodesic Lagrangian (3.1), it computes the effective potential and reduces the ISCO condition d^2V/dR^2=0 to the quartic master equation F(x)=0 in Eqs. (3.21)-(3.25). Proposition 1's uniqueness proof is internal to Appendix A via the Lemma on F'(x); it does not import the uniqueness result from the authors' earlier papers. The known cases a=1 and a=2 are quoted from Ref. [52], but those are limiting checks, not the generic 0<a<2 result. The spacetime from [23] is an input, not a conclusion, so deriving geodesics in it is not circular. No parameter is fitted to data and no observational prediction is tuned. The main caveat is rigor, not circularity: Appendix A contains an arithmetic slip in Eq. (1.19) (17/27*5 - 13/9 - 2 = -8/27, not 5/27), and several inequalities are justified by "graphical analysis"; those affect the completeness of the Lemma's proof, but they do not make the derivation chain circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no fitted parameters. It relies on the known BH solution from [23] and on standard geodesic theory. The only ad hoc element is the graphical root-configuration analysis in the appendix.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The dyonic-like black hole metric (2.4), scalar fields (2.5), and gauge fields (2.6) with parameters satisfying (2.8)-(2.14) constitute an exact solution of the action (2.1).
    The paper takes this solution from Ref. [23] without re-deriving it. If the solution is incorrect or does not meet the stated constraints, all geodesic results in the paper would be affected.
  • domain assumption Neutral test particles and photons move along geodesics of the background metric with no backreaction.
    Standard in black hole geodesic analysis; the paper does not justify it, but it is the standard test-particle approximation.
  • standard math Stability of circular orbits can be read off from the sign of the second derivative of the effective potential at the circular orbit.
    This is a standard result in Lagrangian mechanics for the radial effective potential, but it is an assumption about the perturbation analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper The "elementary graphical analysis" used in the proof of the Lemma exhaustively enumerates all possible root configurations of the quartic F(x) and the cubic F'(x) on (1, infinity).
    The proof of Proposition 1 depends on this enumeration, which is asserted without a fully rigorous classification. If a configuration is missed, uniqueness could fail. This is the main unproved structural assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stability Analysis of Circular Geodesics in Dyonic Dilatonic Black Hole Spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KETIFHKO

@misc{pith2026241115006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stability Analysis of Circular Geodesics in Dyonic Dilatonic Black Hole Spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KETIFHKO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15006}
}
abstract

This research investigates a non-extreme dyonic-like dilatonic charged black hole solution within a four-dimensional gravity model. This model incorporates two scalar (dilaton) fields and two Abelian vector fields, with interactions between the scalar and vector fields mediated by exponential terms involving two dilatonic coupling vectors. The solution is characterized by a dimensionless parameter $a$ (where $0 < a < 2$), which is specifically defined as a function of the dilatonic coupling vectors. The paper further explores solutions for timelike and null circular geodesics, which are crucial for understanding various astrophysical scenarios, including the quasinormal modes of different test fields in the eikonal approximation. For all values of $a$ the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) are found by means of reducing the problem to the solution of fourth order polynomial equation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15006 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The effective potential of test particles for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The effective potential of test particles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Orbital angular momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The normalized ISCO radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Three dimensional plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Three dimensional plot of efficiency in % as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shirokov and Shapiro Effects in the Hartle-Thorne Spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In the Hartle-Thorne metric, angular momentum J and quadrupole moment Q couple radial and azimuthal oscillations in the Shirokov effect and alter Shapiro time delay, with oblate shapes increasing delay and frame-dragg...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [52]

    Particle motion around charged black holes in generalized dilaton-axion gravity

    S. Sarkar, F. Rahaman, I. Radinschi, T. Grammenos, and J. Chakraborty, Particle motion around charged black holes in generalized dilaton-axion gravity, Ad- vances in High Energy Physics 2018, 5427158 (2018), arXiv:1805.00295 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  2. [1]

    Stability Analysis of Circular Geodesics in Dyonic Dilatonic Black Hole Spacetimes

    INTRODUCTION The detection of gravitational waves in 2016 [1] sparked a surge of interest in the physics of stellar-mass black holes (BHs). Einstein’s century-old prediction of these ripples in spacetime led to an ambitious search, culminating in the construction of massive, exquisitely sensitive laser interferometers like LIGO, VIRGO, and others. These i...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    DYONIC-LIKE BLACK HOLE SOLUTION The action of a model incorporating two scalar fields, two 2-forms, and dilatonic coupling vectors is described by S = 1 16πG Z d4x q |g| ( R[g] − gµν∂µ⃗φ∂ν⃗φ − 1 2 e2⃗λ1⃗φF(1) µν F(1)µν − 1 2 e2⃗λ2⃗φF(2) µν F(2)µν ) , (2.1) where g = gµν(x)dxµ ⊗ dxν is the metric, |g| = | det(gµν)|, ⃗φ = (φ1, φ2) is the vector (set) of two...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Such analysis offers valuable in- sight into the nature of these objects and their influence on the surrounding spacetime

    GEODESIC SOLUTIONS The study of geodesics is fundamental to understand- ing the motion of test particles within the gravitational field of dilatonic BHs. Such analysis offers valuable in- sight into the nature of these objects and their influence on the surrounding spacetime. These geodesics are derived from the Lagrangian: L = 1 2 gαβ (x) ˙xα ˙xβ. (3.1) ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    For the Schwarzschild BH ( a = 0), the innermost sta- ble circular orbit (ISCO) radius is: xisco (a = 0) =3

    SOME EXAMPLES For selected values of a = 0, 0.25, 1, 1.5, 2, we overview the following expressions for xisco . For the Schwarzschild BH ( a = 0), the innermost sta- ble circular orbit (ISCO) radius is: xisco (a = 0) =3. (4.1) For a = 1/4, the dimensionless ISCO radius is xisco = 1 16 (12 − 9p) + p X1/4 32(p + 4) + 1 2 s A1/4p X1/4 − X1/4 256(p + 4)2 + T1/...

    work page

  6. [5]

    As expected, in the limiting case Q → 0, RISCO corre- sponds to the Schwarzschild value 6 M

    Reference [23] demonstrates that, for the case a = 2, applying the ra- dial coordinate transformation R = rRN − P, along with MRN = µ + P, the metric (2.4) becomes equivalent to the Reissner–Nordstr¨om metric. As expected, in the limiting case Q → 0, RISCO corre- sponds to the Schwarzschild value 6 M. In the cases of 0 < a ≤ 2 the values of RISCO depend u...

    work page

  7. [6]

    one half

    CONCLUSION In this paper, we have explored the solution for a dyonic-like dilatonic BH. We have investigated circular geodesics of massive, neutral test particles and photons, by using various values for the metric parameters: a , µ and P, which are related to the physical quantities: BH mass M and the net charge Q. We have calculated RISCO , which is the...

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    B. P . Abbott et al, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    B. P . Abbott et al, Tests of General Relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [9]

    A. M. Ghez, B. L. Klein, M. Morris, and E. E. Becklin, High Proper-Motion Stars in the Vicinity of Sagittarius A*: Ev- idence for a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 509, 678 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9807210 [astro-ph]

    1998

  3. [10]

    A. M. Ghez, M. Morris, E. E. Becklin, A. Tanner, and T. Kremenek, The accelerations of stars orbiting the Milky Way’s central black hole, Nature 407, 349 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0009339 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Astrophys

    Gravity Collaboration, Detection of the gravitational red- shift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys. 615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Super- massive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    T. P . Sotiriou, f(R) gravity and scalar-tensor theory, Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 5117 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604028

    2006 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P . G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Mod- ified gravity and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    A. V . Astashenok, S. Capozziello, and S. D. Odintsov, Ex- treme neutron stars from Extended Theories of Gravity, JCAP 01, 001, arXiv:1408.3856 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    A. V . Astashenok, S. Capozziello, and S. D. Odintsov, Fur- ther stable neutron star models from f(R) gravity, JCAP 12, 040, arXiv:1309.1978 [gr-qc]

    1978 arXiv

  11. [18]

    A. V . Astashenok, S. D. Odintsov, and A. de la Cruz- Dombriz, The realistic models of relativistic stars in f (R) = R + αR2 gravity, Class. Quantum Gravity 34, 205008 (2017), arXiv:1704.08311 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Capozziello, R

    S. Capozziello, R. D’Agostino, and O. Luongo, Extended Gravity Cosmography, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1930016 (2019), arXiv:1904.01427 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    A. V . Astashenok, S. Capozziello, S. D. Odintsov, and 15 V . K. Oikonomou, Extended Gravity Description for the GW190814 Supermassive Neutron Star, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135910 (2020), arXiv:2008.10884 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L17 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    Pani and V

    P . Pani and V . Cardoso, Are black holes in alternative theories serious astrophysical candidates? The case for Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet black holes, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084031 (2009), arXiv:0902.1569 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Shankaranarayanan and J

    S. Shankaranarayanan and J. P . Johnson, Modified theo- ries of gravity: Why, how and what?, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 44 (2022), arXiv:2204.06533 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Antoniou, A

    G. Antoniou, A. Papageorgiou, and P . Kanti, Prob- ing Modified Gravity Theories with Scalar Fields Using Black-Hole Images, Universe 9, 147 (2023), arXiv:2210.17533 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Vagnozzi, R

    S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y.-D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, A. Allahyari, P . Bambhaniya, D. Dey, S. G. Ghosh, P . S. Joshi, K. Jusufi, M. Khodadi, R. K. Walia, A. ¨Ovg ¨un, and C. Bambi, Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Teles...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    M. E. Abishev, K. A. Boshkayev, V . D. Dzhunushaliev, and V . D. Ivashchuk, Dilatonic dyon black hole so- lutions, Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 165010 (2015), arXiv:1504.07657 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    M. E. Abishev, K. A. Boshkayev, and V . D. Ivashchuk, Dilatonic dyon-like black hole solutions in the model with two Abelian gauge fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 180 (2017), arXiv:1701.02029 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [28]

    F. B. Belissarova, K. A. Boshkayev, V . D. Ivashchuk, and A. N. Malybayev, Special dyon-like black hole solution in the model with two Abelian gauge fields and two scalar fields, in J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 1690 (2020) p. 012143

    2020

  22. [29]

    A. N. Malybayev, K. A. Boshkayev, and V . D. Ivashchuk, Quasinormal modes in the field of a dyon-like dilatonic black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 475 (2021), arXiv:2103.10920 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, and Z. Stuchl ´ık, Quasi- normal modes, scattering, and Hawking radiation in the vicinity of an Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet black hole, Phys. Rev. D 99, 124042 (2019), arXiv:1903.03483 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Uniyal, R

    A. Uniyal, R. C. Pantig, and A. ¨Ovg ¨un, Probing a non- linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT, Phys. Dark Universe 40, 101178 (2023), arXiv:2205.11072 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Lambiase, R

    G. Lambiase, R. C. Pantig, D. Jyoti Gogoi, and A. ¨Ovg ¨un, Investigating the Connection between Generalized Un- certainty Principle and Asymptotically Safe Gravity in Black Hole Signatures through Shadow and Quasinor- mal Modes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2304.00183 (2023), arXiv...

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Boshkayev, T

    K. Boshkayev, T. Konysbayev, E. Kurmanov, O. Luongo, D. Malafarina, and H. Quevedo, Luminosity of accretion disks in compact objects with a quadrupole, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084009 (2021), arXiv:2106.04932 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Boshkayev, E

    K. Boshkayev, E. Gasper ´ın, A. C. Guti ´errez-Pi˜neres, H. Quevedo, and S. Toktarbay, Motion of test particles in the field of a naked singularity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024024 (2016), arXiv:1509.03827 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [35]

    D. Bini, K. Boshkayev, R. Ruffini, and I. Siutsou, Equa- torial circular geodesics in the Hartle-Thorne spacetime, Nuovo Cimento C Geophysics Space Physics C 36, 31 (2013), arXiv:1306.4792 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [36]

    K. A. Boshkayev, H. Quevedo, M. S. Abutalip, Z. A. Kalymova, and S. S. Suleymanova, Geodesics in the field of a rotating deformed gravitational source, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics A 31, 1641006 (2016), arXiv:1510.02016 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    B. E. Panah, S. H. Hendi, S. Panahiyan, and M. Hassaine, BTZ dilatonic black holes coupled to Maxwell and Born- Infeld electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 084006 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    S. H. Hendi, B. E. Panah, S. Panahiyan, and M. Momen- nia, Dilatonic black holes in gravity’s rainbow with a non- linear source: the effects of thermal fluctuations, Euro- pean Physical Journal C 77, 647 (2017), arXiv:1708.06634 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [39]

    S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah, S. Panahiyan, and A. Sheykhi, Dilatonic BTZ black holes with power-law field, Physics Letters B 767, 214 (2017), arXiv:1703.03403 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [40]

    S. H. Hendi, M. Faizal, B. E. Panah, and S. Panahiyan, Charged dilatonic black holes in gravity’s rainbow, Euro- pean Physical Journal C 76, 296 (2016), arXiv:1508.00234 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    S. H. Hendi, A. Sheykhi, S. Panahiyan, and B. Eslam Panah, Phase transition and thermodynamic geometry of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064028 (2015), arXiv:1509.08593 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Cveti ˇc, G

    M. Cveti ˇc, G. W. Gibbons, and C. N. Pope, Photon spheres and sonic horizons in black holes from super- gravity and other theories, Phys. Rev. D94, 106005 (2016), arXiv:1608.02202 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Huang and H

    Y. Huang and H. Zhang, True gravitational atoms: Spher- ical cloud of dilatonic black holes, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124056 (2022), arXiv:2206.05645 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Huang and H

    Y. Huang and H. Zhang, Scattering of massless scalar field by charged dilatonic black holes, European Physical Jour- nal C 80, 654 (2020), arXiv:2006.01388 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Cadoni, G

    M. Cadoni, G. D’Appollonio, and P . Pani, Phase tran- sitions between Reissner-Nordstrom and dilatonic black holes in 4D AdS spacetime, Journal of High Energy Physics 2010, 100 (2010), arXiv:0912.3520 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Chen, Extremal Dilatonic Black Holes in 4D Gauss- Bonnet Gravity, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- ment 172, 161 (2008), arXiv:0801.0032 [hep-th]

    C. Chen, Extremal Dilatonic Black Holes in 4D Gauss- Bonnet Gravity, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- ment 172, 161 (2008), arXiv:0801.0032 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [47]

    S. Li, T. Mirzaev, A. A. Abdujabbarov, D. Malafarina, B. Ahmedov, and W.-B. Han, Constraining the deforma- tion of a rotating black hole mimicker from its shadow, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084041 (2022), arXiv:2207.10933 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Sarikulov, F

    F. Sarikulov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and 16 B. Ahmedov, Shadow of the Kerr-like black hole, Euro- pean Physical Journal C 82, 771 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    Turimov, M

    B. Turimov, M. Boboqambarova, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchl´ık, Distinguishable feature of electric and mag- netic charged black hole, European Physical Journal Plus 137, 222 (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Zeng, J.-L

    Y. Zeng, J.-L. L ¨u, and Y.-J. Wang, Geodesics of Spheri- cal Dilaton Spacetimes, Chinese Physics Letters 23, 1648 (2006)

    2006

  44. [51]

    Blaga, Timelike Geodesics Around a Charged Spheri- cally Symmetric Dilaton Black Hole, Serbian Astronomi- cal Journal 190, 41 (2015), arXiv:1407.1504 [gr-qc]

    C. Blaga, Timelike Geodesics Around a Charged Spheri- cally Symmetric Dilaton Black Hole, Serbian Astronomi- cal Journal 190, 41 (2015), arXiv:1407.1504 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Blaga, P

    C. Blaga, P . Blaga, and T. Harko, Jacobi and Lyapunov Sta- bility Analysis of Circular Geodesics around a Spherically Symmetric Dilaton Black Hole, Symmetry 15, 329 (2023), arXiv:2301.07678 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Heydari-Fard, M

    M. Heydari-Fard, M. Heydari-Fard, and H. R. Sepa- ngi, Null geodesics and shadow of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 124009 (2022), arXiv:2110.02713 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Soroushfar, R

    S. Soroushfar, R. Saffari, and E. Sahami, Geodesic equa- tions in the static and rotating dilaton black holes: Ana- lytical solutions and applications, Phys. Rev. D94, 024010 (2016), arXiv:1601.03143 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Flathmann and S

    K. Flathmann and S. Grunau, Analytic solutions of the geodesic equation for Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton- axion black holes, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104027 (2015), arXiv:1509.03135 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    V . D. Ivashchuk, A. N. Malybayev, G. S. Nurbakova, and G. Takey, Photon Spheres near Dilatonic Dyon-Like Black Holes in a Model with Two Abelian Gauge Fields and Two Scalar Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 29, 411 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Boshkayev, G

    K. Boshkayev, G. Suliyeva, V . Ivashchuk, and A. Uraza- lina, Circular geodesics in the field of double-charged dilatonic black holes, European Physical Journal C 84, 19 (2024), arXiv:2306.01927 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Stuchl ´ık, M

    Z. Stuchl ´ık, M. Koloˇs, J. Kov´aˇr, P . Slan´y, and A. Tursunov, Influence of Cosmic Repulsion and Magnetic Fields on Accretion Disks Rotating around Kerr Black Holes, Uni- verse 6, 26 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    K. A. Bronnikov and G. N. Shikin, Interacting fields in general relativity theory, Soviet Physics Journal 20, 1138 (1977)

    1977

  53. [61]

    G. W. Gibbons and K.-I. Maeda, Black holes and mem- branes in higher-dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nuclear Physics B 298, 741 (1988)

    1988

  54. [62]

    Garfinkle, G

    D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger, Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3140 (1991)

    1991

  55. [63]

    Charged black holes in string theory

    D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger, Erratum: “Charged black holes in string theory” [Phys. Rev. D 43, 3140 (1991)], Phys. Rev. D 45, 3888 (1992)

    1991

  56. [64]

    Pugliese, H

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo, and R. Ruffini, Circular motion of neutral test particles in Reissner-Nordstr¨om spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 83, 024021 (2011), arXiv:1012.5411 [astro- ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Sen, Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory., Phys

    A. Sen, Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory., Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1006 (1992), arXiv:hep- th/9204046 [hep-th]

    1992

  58. [66]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman and Company, 1973)

    1973

  59. [67]

    A. H. Bokhari, J. Rayimbaev, and B. Ahmedov, Test par- ticles dynamics around deformed Reissner-Nordstr ¨om black hole, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124078 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.