Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twitter

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.15462 v3 pith:B66WKEKK submitted 2024-11-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hatespeechmodelsreal-worlddatasetsdetectionglobalhateday
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To address the global challenge of online hate speech, prior research has developed detection models to flag such content on social media. However, due to systematic biases in evaluation datasets, the real-world effectiveness of these models remains unclear, particularly across geographies. We introduce HateDay, the first global hate speech dataset representative of social media settings, constructed from a random sample of all tweets posted on September 21, 2022 and covering eight languages and four English-speaking countries. Using HateDay, we uncover substantial variation in the prevalence and composition of hate speech across languages and regions. We show that evaluations on academic datasets greatly overestimate real-world detection performance, which we find is very low, especially for non-European languages. Our analysis identifies key drivers of this gap, including models' difficulty to distinguish hate from offensive speech and a mismatch between the target groups emphasized in academic datasets and those most frequently targeted in real-world settings. We argue that poor model performance makes public models ill-suited for automatic hate speech moderation and find that high moderation rates are only achievable with substantial human oversight. Our results underscore the need to evaluate detection systems on data that reflects the complexity and diversity of real-world social media.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Compositional Generalisation for Explainable Hate Speech Detection

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A grammar-generated balanced synthetic dataset, U-PLEAD, plus a new TARGET benchmark shows that mixing synthetic examples into training improves hate speech models' recognition of unseen target-expression combinations...

  2. Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media

    cs.SI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Community-driven fact-checking is promising and useful, but it cannot fully replace professional fact-checkers; hybrid collaboration is the recommended path.

Pith tools