Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Metallic transports from accelerating black holes

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that slowly accelerating AdS4 black holes are holographically dual to a metallic quantum liquid whose resistivity scales as $R_b\sim T^{2/3}$ at low temperature and $R_b\sim T^{-1/3}$ at higher temperature, corresponding…

desk verdict The DBI-in-C-metric calculation is real, but the z=3 scaling collapses to T^2 and T^{-1} once you use the paper's own temperature-horizon relation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15474 v2 pith:AH76I6BR submitted 2024-11-23 hep-th gr-qc

Dibakar Roychowdhury This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 83C5781T30 PACS 04.70.Dy11.25.Tq
keywords acceleratingblackholesholographicdualityprobeD-braneDCconductivityresistivityscalingquantumcriticalexponentstrangemetalAdS4C-metric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a four-dimensional accelerating black hole in anti-de Sitter spacetime, when probed by a D-brane, is holographically dual to a strongly coupled metallic quantum liquid at finite density. Working in the slow-acceleration limit, the author treats the cosmic string that pulls the black hole as a small perturbation and computes the thermodynamics and DC transport of the boundary field theory from a Dirac-Born-Infeld action. The central quantitative claim is that the Ohmic resistivity of the boundary theory scales as $R_b \sim T^{2/3}$ at low temperature, where U(1) charge carriers sourced by the D-brane dominate, and as $R_b \sim T^{-1/3}$ at higher temperature, where thermally excited charge pairs dominate; both scalings point to a dynamic critical exponent $z=3$. If correct, this identifies accelerating black holes as a new holographic route to metallic phases whose transport exponents differ from the $z=2$ strange metal. The result matters because acceleration of the bulk black hole becomes a tunable 'driving force' that produces a steady current in the boundary theory even without an applied electric field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a probe D-brane embedded in the C-metric of an accelerating AdS4 black hole, restricted to the $\theta=\theta_0$ hyperplane, with its dynamics governed by the Dirac-Born-Infeld action for the world-volume U(1) gauge field. The slow-acceleration assumption $A\ell\ll 1$ lets the author define a quasi-static grand-canonical partition function for the boundary QFT, with the cosmic string treated as a perturbation; this partition function yields the thermodynamics. The transport calculation uses the Karch-O'Bannon prescription: turn on a world-volume electric field $E=-F_{t\phi}$, impose that the DBI Lagrangian density ratio $N/D$ remains positive definite between horizon and boundary, and require its minimum to sit at an interior radius $\upsilon_*$. That minimization fixes the conserved momentum $H$ and thereby the boundary current, giving the Ohmic conductivity as a function of temperature and of the U(1) charge density $J^t_b$. The temperature exponents in the two regimes follow from writing the black hole mass in terms of temperature through the inverse horizon radius relation.

What would settle it

Compute the resistivity at finite (not merely infinitesimal) acceleration $A$ by solving the DBI equations numerically and check whether $R_b\, T^{-2/3}$ stays constant in the low-temperature regime; if the $T^{2/3}$ law breaks down for $A$ values where the equilibrium partition function is still used, the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the boundary QFT dual to a slowly accelerating AdS4 black hole exhibits a metallic 'quantum liquid' phase with dynamic critical exponent $z=3$. The author computes the DC conductivity from the D-brane world-volume action and finds that black hole acceleration enhances the conductivity and generates a persistent background current $J_0$ even at zero electric field, because the cosmic string acts as an additional driving agency on the charge carriers. The resistivity in the U(1)-dominated low-temperature regime is given by Eq. (55), $R_b = 8\pi^{2/3} T^{2/3}/(3\cdot 2^{1/6}\alpha K \upsilon_+^{4/3} J^t_b)$, while in the thermal regime Eq. (57) gives $R_b \sim T^{-1/3}$. Combining the two regimes through the holographic scaling relation $T^{-|p-2|/z}$ with $p=1$ spatial dimension on the D-brane world-volume yields $z=3$ in both limits, leading the author to conjecture that the dual QFT sits at a quantum critical point with dynamic exponent three.

Load-bearing premise

The whole thermodynamic and transport calculation rests on the assumption that a quasi-static equilibrium grand-canonical partition function exists for the boundary QFT when the bulk acceleration is infinitesimal ($A\ll 1$) and that the D-brane does not interact with the cosmic string; if either fails, the predicted resistivities lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The boundary QFT dual to a slowly accelerating AdS4 black hole is a quantum critical metal with dynamic critical exponent $z=3$, distinct from the $z=2$ strange metal of the standard holographic probe-brane setup.
  • Black hole acceleration enhances the DC conductivity and produces a steady background current $J_0$ in the boundary theory even when no external electric field is applied.
  • The low-temperature heat capacity is linear in $T$ while the resistivity scales as $T^{2/3}$, so the phase combines Fermi-liquid-like thermodynamics with non-Fermi-liquid transport.
  • In the thermal regime the resistivity falls as $T^{-1/3}$; both temperature laws are governed by the same $z=3$ critical exponent once the boundary dimension $p=1$ is fixed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quasi-static equilibrium assumption is only valid at $A\ll 1$, the $T^{2/3}$ and $T^{-1/3}$ laws should be viewed as leading-order limiting scalings; numerically evaluating the resistivity at finite acceleration would test whether the $z=3$ exponent survives beyond the perturbative regime.
  • The same DBI probe could be extended to include a magnetic field, predicting a Hall conductivity with an acceleration-induced contribution; that would give a sharp, checkable signature of the persistent current.
  • Because the background current $J_0$ appears at zero electric field, the accelerating black hole setup may provide a holographic model of a system with an intrinsic current-carrying ground state; whether this current is truly dissipationless or simply a steady Ohmic drift is left open by the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies D-brane probes in slowly accelerating AdS4 black holes (the C-metric) and uses DBI electrodynamics to compute thermodynamic quantities and DC conductivities for the dual boundary QFT at finite density. The central claim, stated in the abstract and Section 5, is that the resistivity obeys Rb ~ T^{2/3} in a U(1)-dominated low-temperature regime and Rb ~ T^{-1/3} in a thermal-dominated regime, which the author interprets as evidence for a new quantum liquid phase with dynamic critical exponent z = 3. The calculation relies on a quasi-static equilibrium assumption valid only for A ≪ 1 and on neglecting D-brane/cosmic-string interactions.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, this would be a novel holographic example of a metallic phase whose temperature exponents differ from the z = 2 strange metal of Hartnoll, Polchinski, Silverstein, and Tong, and it would connect accelerating black hole spacetimes to finite-density holography. The setup is original, and the paper contains a number of nontrivial analytic computations, including the derivation of thermodynamic quantities and the identification of a steady background current induced by acceleration. However, the headline z = 3 result rests on a temperature-scaling step that is not valid, as detailed in the major comments; the manuscript does not provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, and several algebraic steps are asserted rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction, Sections 3–5] The entire construction rests on the quasi-static equilibrium assumption stated in the Introduction, which the author restricts to A ≪ 1, together with the neglect of interactions between the D-brane and the cosmic string. The paper does not quantify the corrections to the free energy or transport coefficients from these neglected effects, nor does it demonstrate that the resulting boundary theory is a bona fide QFT with a well-defined thermal partition function. Since the central claim of a new quantum liquid phase is a statement about that boundary QFT, the absence of a controlled approximation scheme is a load-bearing gap that is flagged but not resolved in the manuscript.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs (47)–(49)] The step from Eq (47) to Eq (49) is not shown; the text says only 'finally reveals'. Given that Eqs (47)–(48) are lengthy and depend on υ_*^{(0)} and m through the intricate function V(m,A) of Eq (45), the expression for σ_b in Eq (49) and its subsequent use in Section 5 require a detailed derivation. In particular, it is not demonstrated that the coefficient of E² in Eq (47) is positive and that no additional E-independent terms mix into the definition of σ_b.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5, Eqs (55) and (57)] The notation '3.2^{1/6}' and '8.211^{1/6}' should be typeset as 3·2^{1/6} and 8·2^{11/6} (or with imes), as the current form is easily misread as a decimal number.
  2. [Section 4, Eq (52)] The parameter ζ appears in Eq (52) and again in Eq (56) but is never defined in the text; it should be defined or removed.
  3. [Section 3, Eq (21)] The statement that at zero temperature ¯p_0 ∼ ¯µ_0^3 and ¯ϵ_0 ∼ ¯µ_0 with the same ¯µ_0 is dimensionally unexpected for a 2+1-dimensional CFT and should be clarified.
  4. [Section 4, after Eq (36)] The boundary current J^φ_b is first given as αH/((1−A²)K), but the subsequent text says a factor α^{-1}(1−A²)K has been absorbed into J^φ_b; this apparent redefinition should be stated explicitly when Eq (47) is introduced.
  5. [Section 6] The phrase 'a similar analysis' should read 'A similar analysis', and the concluding paragraph would benefit from explicit equation numbers for the two resistivity scalings being summarized.
  6. [Section 3, Eq (14)] The notation O(A²T) is imprecise because the inversion of Eq (5) may also contain O(A²) terms at zeroth order in T; the paper should specify the full form of the next correction or state the regime of T in which the displayed expression is valid.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Claimed T^{2/3} and T^{-1/3} resistivity scalings (and the z=3 phase) reduce to a renaming of the mass dependence because υ+ is not eliminated via the horizon condition.

  1. self definitional [Section 5, Eqs (50)-(57); in particular Eqs (51), (55), (57)]
    "Temperature (T ) of the black hole can be expressed in terms of inverse horizon radius (υ+), mass ( m) and acceleration ( A), which reads as [6], [14] T = 1/(2πυ+)(A2(mυ+ − 1) + mυ3+ + 1) (50) ... which can be inverted to obtain m = 2πT/υ2+ + O(mA2). (51) Using (51), we can express ... as a function of temperature (T ) ... Rb = 8π2/3T 2/3/(3.21/6αKυ4/3+ Jtb) (55)"

    By Eq (51), T/υ+^2 = m/(2π)+O(mA^2), so the factors T^{2/3}/υ+^{4/3} in (55) and T^{-1/3}υ+^{2/3} in (57) are identically (2π)^{-2/3}m^{2/3} and (2π)^{1/3}m^{-1/3} at leading order. υ+ is not eliminated using the horizon condition (50); the paper has simply renamed m as T/υ+^2 and then read the exponent as if υ+ were T-independent. Using the paper's own leading-order inversion (14), r+ = 4παT/3, so υ+ = 3/(4παT); substituting into (55) gives Rb ∼ T^2 and into (57) gives Rb ∼ T^{-1}. The 'predicted' T^{2/3} and T^{-1/3}—and the z=3 conclusion—are therefore an artifact of incomplete variable elimination; the output scaling reduces by construction to the m-scaling that was fed in via (51).

full rationale

The bulk of the calculation (DBI action, equations of motion, conductivity formulas (48)-(49)) is a standard probe-brane computation with external inputs, and the paper contains no load-bearing self-citations. However, the central transport result is the temperature dependence of the resistivity in Section 5. The step from (50)-(51) to (55) and (57) is circular in the sense defined here: the temperature exponents are obtained by substituting m = 2πT/υ+^2 without solving for υ+(T), so the displayed 'T' scaling is exactly the m-scaling of the conductivity formulas. The paper's own Eq (14) provides the missing relation and changes the exponents to 2 and -1, undermining the z=3 claim. Because the novel quantum-liquid phase is claimed on the basis of these two exponents, the central claim partially reduces to the input variable choice. No self-citation or uniqueness-import issue is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no free parameters and no new entities: C, H, β are integration constants or physical parameters (charge density, current, brane tension), and θ0 is a geometric embedding choice. The ledger instead records the domain assumptions needed to connect the accelerating bulk to a thermal boundary QFT. These are the probe limit, the quasi-static equilibrium assumption, and the imported scaling rule used to assign z=3.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps the accelerating AdS4 black hole to a boundary QFT at finite density.
    The whole paper interprets bulk gravitational data (D-brane thermodynamics, conductivity) as dual QFT observables; no independent check of this duality is provided in the paper.
  • domain assumption D-brane probes the bulk in the probe limit, with no backreaction and no mutual interaction with the cosmic string.
    Introduction: 'we always work with the slow acceleration (Aℓ ≪ 1) limit ... and consider no mutual interaction between the D-brane and the cosmic string in the bulk.' The paper does not justify this; for a brane crossing a conical deficit this is nontrivial.
  • domain assumption A quasi-static equilibrium partition function exists for A ≪ 1, so the cosmic string acts as a small perturbation.
    Introduction: 'The computation of thermodynamic entities and charge transports are based on the assumption that the partition function can be defined considering a quasi-static equilibrium.' All thermodynamic and transport expressions in Sections 3-5 inherit this.
  • standard math The DBI Lagrangian must be positive definite over the radial range; the condition N* = 0 is used to fix the integration constants H and the conductivity.
    Section 4, Eqs (40)-(42): the method is imported from Karch-O'Bannon [30] and is standard in DBI probe computations.
  • domain assumption The scaling relation T^{-|p-2|/z} for holographic probes with p spatial worldvolume directions holds, and the D-brane is p=1.
    Section 5: explicitly invoked to convert the computed resistivity exponent T^{-1/3} into z=3. The form is taken from the strange metal literature [27],[31]; the paper asserts the p=1 identification without detailed justification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metallic transports from accelerating black holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AH76I6BR

@misc{pith2026241115474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metallic transports from accelerating black holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AH76I6BR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15474}
}
abstract

We probe four dimensional accelerating black holes with D-brane and build up the notion of metallic holography for spacetime with negative cosmological constant. We explore various thermodynamic entities associated with the boundary QFT at low temperatures and finite chemical potential. The DC conductivity in the boundary QFT is enhanced due to the effects of black hole acceleration in the bulk counterpart. We further compute resistivity in different temperature regime, which reveals a new quantum liquid phase with dynamic critical exponent $ z=3 $.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15474 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We show the Poincare disc for an accelerating black hole spacetime. The black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonperfect Carrollian Fluids Through Holography

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Bulk gravitational radiation, diagnosed by the Fernández-Álvarez–Senovilla criterion, is dual to dissipative (Carrollian) boundary-fluid data, with an entropy-flux law and a Robinson-Trautman worked example.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Levi-Civita, Ds2 einsteiniani in campi newtoniani, Atti Accad

    T. Levi-Civita, Ds2 einsteiniani in campi newtoniani, Atti Accad. Nazl. Lincei. 27 (1918) 343

    work page 1918

  2. [2]

    Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerat- ing mass in general relativity,

    J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, “Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerat- ing mass in general relativity,” Annals Phys. 98, 98-127 (1976) doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(76)90240-2

    doi:10.1016/0003- 1976

  3. [3]

    Pair of accelerated black holes in an anti-de Sitter background: the AdS C-metric

    O. J. C. Dias and J. P. S. Lemos, “Pair of accelerated black holes in anti- de Sitter background: AdS C metric,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 064001 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.064001 [arXiv:hep-th/0210065 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Accelerating black holes in anti-de Sitter universe,

    J. Podolsky, “Accelerating black holes in anti-de Sitter universe,” Czech. J. Phys. 52, 1-10 (2002) doi:10.1023/A:1013961411430 [arXiv:gr-qc/0202033 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    A New form of the C metric,

    K. Hong and E. Teo, “A New form of the C metric,” Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3269- 3277 (2003) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/14/321 [arXiv:gr-qc/0305089 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Thermodynamics of Ac- celerating Black Holes,

    M. Appels, R. Gregory and D. Kubiznak, “Thermodynamics of Ac- celerating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, no.13, 131303 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.131303 [arXiv:1604.08812 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Holographic Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes,

    A. Anabal´ on, M. Appels, R. Gregory, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, R. B. Mann and A. Ovg¨ un, “Holographic Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.10, 104038 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104038 [arXiv:1805.02687 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Accelerating Black Hole Chemistry,

    R. Gregory and A. Scoins, “Accelerating Black Hole Chemistry,” Phys. Lett. B 796, 191-195 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.071 [arXiv:1904.09660 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Black Hole Thermodynamics with Coni- cal Defects,

    M. Appels, R. Gregory and D. Kubiznak, “Black Hole Thermodynamics with Coni- cal Defects,” JHEP 05, 116 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)116 [arXiv:1702.00490 [hep-th]]. 12

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Thermodynamics of accelerating AdS 4 black holes from the covariant phase space,

    H. Kim, N. Kim, Y. Lee and A. Poole, “Thermodynamics of accelerating AdS 4 black holes from the covariant phase space,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.12, 1095 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12266-4 [arXiv:2306.16187 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The quasilocal energy and thermodynamic first law in accelerating AdS black holes,

    W. Kim, M. Nam and S. H. Yi, “The quasilocal energy and thermodynamic first law in accelerating AdS black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 856, 138913 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138913 [arXiv:2406.01897 [hep-th]]

    2024

  4. [12]

    Thermody- namics of Charged, Rotating, and Accelerating Black Holes,

    A. Anabal´ on, F. Gray, R. Gregory, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak and R. B. Mann, “Thermody- namics of Charged, Rotating, and Accelerating Black Holes,” JHEP 04, 096 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)096 [arXiv:1811.04936 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Accelerating Black Holes,

    R. Gregory, “Accelerating Black Holes,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 942, no.1, 012002 (2017) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/942/1/012002 [arXiv:1712.04992 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes

    M. Appels, “Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes.”

  7. [15]

    On acceleration in three dimen- sions,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, R. Gregory and A. Scoins, “On acceleration in three dimen- sions,” JHEP 05, 063 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)063 [arXiv:2202.08823 [hep- th]]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Exploring accelerating hairy black holes in 2+1 dimensions: the asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter class and its holog- raphy,

    A. Cisterna, F. Diaz, R. B. Mann and J. Oliva, “Exploring accelerating hairy black holes in 2+1 dimensions: the asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter class and its holog- raphy,” JHEP 11, 073 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)073 [arXiv:2309.05559 [hep- th]]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Accelerating Black Holes in 2 + 1 dimensions: Holography revisited,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, A. Cisterna, F. Diaz and R. Gregory, “Accelerating Black Holes in 2 + 1 dimensions: Holography revisited,” JHEP 09, 122 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)122 [arXiv:2308.00613 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Thermodynamics of acceler- ating and supersymmetric AdS4 black holes,

    D. Cassani, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Thermodynamics of acceler- ating and supersymmetric AdS4 black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 086005 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.086005 [arXiv:2106.05571 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Regularized conformal electrodynam- ics: Novel C metric in 2+1 dimensions,

    D. Kubiznak, O. Sv ´ ıtek and T. Tahamtan, “Regularized conformal electrodynam- ics: Novel C metric in 2+1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.6, 064054 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064054 [arXiv:2404.14335 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Thermodynamics of Regular Accelerating Black Holes,

    M. Astorino, “Thermodynamics of Regular Accelerating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.6, 064007 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064007 [arXiv:1612.04387 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, D. Kubiznak and J. Oliva, “Accelerated black holes beyond Maxwell’s electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B 834, 137447 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137447 [arXiv:2205.15777 [gr-qc]]

    2022

  14. [22]

    Holographic entanglement en- tropy for charged accelerating AdS black holes,

    M. Tavakoli, B. Mirza and Z. Sherkatghanad, “Holographic entanglement en- tropy for charged accelerating AdS black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B, 114620 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114620 [arXiv:1804.06727 [hep-th]]

    2019

  15. [23]

    Quasinormal modes and stability of accelerating Reissner-Norsdtr¨ om AdS black holes,

    R. D. B. Fontana and F. C. Mena, “Quasinormal modes and stability of accelerating Reissner-Norsdtr¨ om AdS black holes,” JHEP 10, 047 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)047 [arXiv:2203.13933 [gr-qc]]. 13

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    CFT Duals for Accelerating Black Holes,

    M. Astorino, “CFT Duals for Accelerating Black Holes,” Phys. Lett. B 760, 393-405 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.019 [arXiv:1605.06131 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Generalized Fefferman- Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,

    G. Arenas-Henriquez, F. Diaz and D. Rivera-Betancour, “Generalized Fefferman- Graham gauge and boundary Weyl structures,” [arXiv:2411.12513 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Holographic complexity in charged accelerating black holes,

    S. Jiang and J. Jiang, “Holographic complexity in charged accelerating black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 823, 136731 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136731 [arXiv:2106.09371 [hep-th]]

    2021

  19. [27]

    Towards strange metallic holography,

    S. A. Hartnoll, J. Polchinski, E. Silverstein and D. Tong, “Towards strange metallic holography,” JHEP 04, 120 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2010)120 [arXiv:0912.1061 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zero Sound from Holography,

    A. Karch, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Zero Sound from Holography,” [arXiv:0806.3796 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Holographic Quantum Liquid,

    A. Karch, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Holographic Quantum Liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051602 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.051602

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    Metallic AdS/CFT,

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon, “Metallic AdS/CFT,” JHEP 09, 024 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/024 [arXiv:0705.3870 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Notes on Properties of Holographic Strange Metals,

    B. H. Lee and D. W. Pang, “Notes on Properties of Holographic Strange Metals,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 104011 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.104011 [arXiv:1006.4915 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,

    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R. C. Myers and R. M. Thomson, “Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density,” JHEP 02, 016 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/02/016 [arXiv:hep-th/0611099 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Strange Metallic Behavior in Anisotropic Background,

    B. H. Lee, D. W. Pang and C. Park, “Strange Metallic Behavior in Anisotropic Background,” JHEP 07, 057 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)057 [arXiv:1006.1719 [hep-th]]. 14

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.