Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Hybrid interacting quantum Hall thermal machine

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A closed quantum Hall edge channel, tunnel-coupled to two interacting ν=2 terminals and driven by Lorentzian pulses, can act as an engine, heat pump, refrigerator, or a hybrid engine-plus-heat-pump machine, with exergy up to about 95%.

desk verdict A clever and internally consistent device proposal whose main quantitative claim—interaction-enhanced performance—is likely a normalization artifact from dividing by outer-channel drive power instead of total injected power. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16240 v2 pith:G7WC7OWR submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

S. Finocchiaro , D. Ferraro , M. Sassetti , G. Benenti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph PACS 73.23.-b05.70.Ln
keywords quantumHallthermalmachinechiralLuttingerliquidedge-magnetoplasmonfractionalizationphoto-assistedtunnelingFloquetscatteringmatrixexergyLevitons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single closed quantum Hall edge channel forming a tiny quantum dot can operate as a multitasking thermal machine when it is tunnel-coupled to two interacting $\nu=2$ edge states held at different temperatures and chemical potentials, with one edge driven by periodic Lorentzian voltage pulses. By tuning the chemical potentials and temperatures, the same device can act as an engine that converts injected ac power into electric power, as a heat pump that transfers heat against the thermal bias, as a refrigerator, or as a hybrid engine-plus-heat-pump machine. The authors evaluate performance with exergy, the ratio of useful output to input in entropy-production terms, finding about 7% for the engine, about 90% for the heat pump, and close to 95% for the hybrid regime. A central result is that electron-electron interactions in the $\nu=2$ leads can be treated exactly through the chiral Luttinger liquid formalism, which fractionalizes the voltage drive, and the device's working regimes are robust, and in some parameter regions slightly improved, under strong interaction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the edge-magnetoplasmon scattering matrix $\Sigma(L,\omega)$ of the interacting $\nu=2$ edge states, which connects incoming to outgoing bosonic fields through an interaction region of length $L$. Its action on the classical drive is the fractionalization of the applied voltage: the drive reaching the quantum dot is $V_{1,\mathrm{out}}(t)=\cos^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_c)+\sin^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_n)$, with $\theta$ the interaction angle and $\tau_{c/n}=L/v_{c/n}$ the charged- and neutral-mode times of flight. This modified voltage defines the photo-assisted tunneling amplitudes $P_n(q)$ entering the Floquet scattering matrix $S^{(F)}(E_n,E)$ of the single-level dot. The machinery turns the exact interaction physics into an effective single-particle scattering problem, from which the charge, energy, and heat currents and the exergy $\Phi$ are computed.

What would settle it

Measure the voltage pulse that actually reaches the quantum dot after passing through the interacting region of a $\nu=2$ edge: the fractionalization picture predicts $V_{1,\mathrm{out}}(t)=\cos^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_c)+\sin^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_n)$, i.e., two shifted copies of the incoming pulse separated by $\tau_n-\tau_c$. Observing the original single-pulse shape (or an unexplained distortion) would falsify the interaction-enhancement claim, since the photo-assisted amplitudes and the exergy maps are built from this modified voltage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a hybrid thermal machine can be realized with a closed Hall edge channel (a quantum dot at filling factor $\nu=1$) tunneling-coupled to two $\nu=2$ edge states in contact with reservoirs at temperatures $T_L\geq T_R$ and chemical potentials $\mu_L$, $\mu_R$, with the outer channel of the left terminal driven by a train of Lorentzian voltage pulses with $q=1$. Treating the electron-electron interaction in the $\nu=2$ terminals exactly through the chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge-magnetoplasmon scattering matrix, the voltage that reaches the dot is the fractionalized combination $V_{1,\mathrm{out}}(t)=\cos^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_c)+\sin^2\theta\, V_{\mathrm{ac}}(t-\tau_n)$, and the photo-assisted Floquet amplitudes are built from this modified drive. With these amplitudes in the Floquet scattering matrix of a single-level dot, the authors compute charge, energy, and heat currents and the exergy figure of merit. They find parameter regions where the device operates as an engine ($\Phi\approx 7\%$ at $\hbar\Omega=2.6\Gamma$), as a heat pump ($\Phi\approx 90\%$), with coexistence of engine and heat pump reaching $\Phi\approx 95\%$, and as a refrigerator reaching $\Phi\approx 7\%$. They further show that all these regimes persist at strong coupling $\theta=\pi/4$ and that in some parameter regions the exergy is enhanced by interaction.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the premise that the only effect of electron-electron interaction in the $\nu=2$ leads is a coherent fractionalization of the applied voltage pulse into $V_{1,\mathrm{out}}(t)$, with no backscattering and with interactions fully screened at the tunneling contacts; if real devices deviate from this voltage-fractionalization picture, the predicted regime maps and the claimed interaction enhancement would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same device can act as engine, heat pump, refrigerator, or engine-plus-heat-pump hybrid simply by changing the chemical potentials and temperatures; no geometric change is needed.
  • In the parameters studied, the heat pump exergy is about 90%, the engine exergy about 7%, and the hybrid exergy close to 95%, with the engine contribution up to roughly 17% of the heat pump contribution.
  • The working regimes are qualitatively unchanged at strong electron-electron interaction ($\theta=\pi/4$), and interaction can slightly enhance the exergy in restricted parameter regions.
  • The drive frequency matters: at $\hbar\Omega\lesssim\Gamma$ the engine region shrinks and $\Phi\lesssim 4\%$, while at $\hbar\Omega\gg\Gamma$ the positive-power region grows but $\Phi$ stays below about 6%; an intermediate frequency such as $\hbar\Omega=2.6\Gamma$ maximizes the work-to-work conversion.
  • The refrigerator regime reaches at most $\Phi\approx 7\%$ and, for the parameters considered, does not overlap with the engine regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test, beyond the paper's scope, is to check whether the exergy enhancement survives at finite pulse width $\delta$ and for non-Lorentzian drives; the fractionalization machinery predicts a specific dependence on $\delta$ and on the ratio $\tau_n/\tau_c$ that could be compared with experiments.
  • The same device geometry might be used as a built-in probe of the interaction angle $\theta$ and the magnetoplasmon velocities: the position, shape, and exergy of the engine/hybrid regions encode $\tau_c$, $\tau_n$, and $\theta$ through Eq. (21), so fitting the measured regime maps would extract these microscopic parameters.
  • The coexistence of engine and heat pump regimes in a single two-terminal driven dot suggests that similar hybrid multitasking might appear in other edge-state platforms, such as helical edges of topological insulators, where the fractionalization is replaced by different interaction structures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a hybrid quantum thermal machine built from a closed ν=1 quantum Hall edge dot tunnel-coupled to two ν=2 edge-state reservoirs kept at different temperatures and chemical potentials. One reservoir is driven by a periodic train of Lorentzian voltage pulses. Interactions in the ν=2 terminals are treated with the chiral Luttinger liquid formalism, so the drive fractionalizes according to the edge-magnetoplasmon scattering matrix. The authors derive charge, energy, and heat currents in a Floquet scattering picture and characterize engine, heat pump, hybrid, and refrigerator regimes using the exergy Φ introduced in Ref. [27]. Numerical density plots show robust behavior and, in some parameter regions, an interaction-induced enhancement of the exergy.

Significance. The proposed geometry is a natural extension of driven quantum Hall heat engines, and the use of exergy allows a unified discussion of multitasking thermal machines. The analytic derivations are clearly presented: the Appendix A regularization of the divergent term I^u_{L,2} is careful for smooth Fermi functions, and the current and exergy formulas are internally consistent. The identification of coexisting engine and heat-pump regimes is interesting and, in principle, testable with existing leviton sources and Hall bars. The value of the paper, however, depends on whether the reported interaction enhancement is a physical effect rather than an artifact of the power normalization used in the exergy; with the current formulation this is not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (37), (49), (14), (46)] The exergy denominator Pin is the power in the outer channel after fractionalization, not the total power supplied by the drive. From Eq. (14), the average of V_{1,out}^2 plus V_{2,out}^2 equals the average of V_{ac}^2, so the total power delivered to the two outgoing channels is P0 = (e^2/4πħ)(1/T)∫V_{ac}^2 dt, independent of θ. For θ=π/4 with τ_c≠τ_n, Pin is approximately P0/2. Because Pin enters the denominator of Φ in Eq. (49), the ratio Φ(π/4)/Φ(0) shown in Figs. 3(c) and 4(c) can exceed one even when the useful output currents are unchanged by interactions. In addition, Eq. (46) omits the dissipation (P0−Pin)/T_L of the inner-channel energy in the left reservoir. I request that the exergy be recomputed with the total drive power P0 in the denominator (and the inner-channel dissipation added to the entropy production), and that the interaction-enhancement claim be re-evaluated with this corrected normalization.
  2. [Section II.C, Eqs. (15)-(17), (21)] The central claim about interactions rests on a specific separation: interactions are treated exactly inside the ν=2 leads but are assumed to be completely screened at the dot-lead tunneling contacts and inside the dot. The text stipulates this by assuming additional screening at the QPCs and a single relevant dot level with spacing ΔE≈10 K in Eq. (15). These are plausible but unquantified assumptions. Charging effects or multi-level participation would alter the Breit-Wigner form in Eq. (17), and interaction corrections to the QPC tunneling would modify the Floquet amplitudes in Eq. (21). The paper would be strengthened by an estimate showing these corrections are negligible for the parameters used in Figs. 3-6, or by a discussion of how the regime maps would change if they were not.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are several typos: “co-propropagating” in Section II.A, “defintion” in Appendix A, and “KB” rather than “kB” in the caption of Figure 10.
  2. [Appendix C, Fig. 9] The text refers to panels (a)-(d) as corresponding to low and high frequencies, but the figure caption does not list the specific Ω values used in each panel; adding those values would make the discussion concrete.
  3. [Introduction and Appendix D] The abstract says that regions where two regimes coexist can be identified, but Appendix D states that there is no overlap between the refrigerator and engine behavior; clarifying that the coexistence statement refers specifically to the engine and heat-pump regimes would avoid confusion.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A7)] The statement that all terms with s>2 in the Taylor expansion vanish relies on the decay of derivatives of the Fermi function for smooth periodic drives; this is reasonable for the Lorentzian train used here, but stating the smoothness requirement explicitly would make the regularization argument more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exergy results are computed from a self-contained Floquet–Luttinger model with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the model starts from the chiral Luttinger Hamiltonian (1), diagonalizes it into charged and neutral modes, obtains the edge-magnetoplasmon scattering matrix (11), and derives the voltage fractionalization (14). The photo-assisted amplitudes (21) are then constructed from the Fourier coefficients of the fractionalized voltage by the standard convolution property of products of periodic phase factors, and the Floquet scattering matrix (23) yields the charge, energy, and heat currents (28)-(42). All exergy values in Figs. 3-6 are computed from these formulas at fixed parameters (Ω=2.6 Γ/ℏ, δ=0.09, q=1) and are not fitted to the desired working regimes. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. 36, 43, 53, 54) provide standard results for voltage fractionalization and leviton amplitudes that are also restated in the text and are consistent with external experimental and theoretical work; no uniqueness theorem or unverified ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior papers in a way that forces the conclusions. The skeptic's normalization concern, that Pin omits the inner-channel power P0-Pin and could therefore inflate the apparent interaction enhancement, is a physical bookkeeping critique about which input power should appear in the efficiency; it does not make any equation equivalent to its own input by construction, since Pin emerges from the Floquet energy-current derivation in Appendix A rather than being chosen to force the enhancement. Therefore no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theoretical predictions depend on standard mesoscopic transport assumptions (bosonization, Floquet scattering, single-level dot) and on chosen operating parameters. No parameter is fitted to a target result; the regime maps are computed from the stated formulas.

free parameters (6)
  • q (Lorentzian pulse amplitude) = 1
    Set to 1 for integer leviton injection; results are shown only for q=1, other values only claimed qualitatively.
  • δ = W/T (pulse width ratio) = 0.09
    Fixed to an experimentally achievable value; no robustness scan over δ is provided.
  • ℏΩ/Γ (drive frequency) = 2.6
    Chosen as a compromise after Appendix C shows exergy is lower at low and high frequencies; this choice is not derived.
  • θ (interaction angle) = 0 and π/4
    Noninteracting and maximal-interaction limits are compared; the enhancement claim is specific to θ=π/4.
  • τ_c, τ_n (flight times) = 7.5e-12 s, 1.5e-11 s
    Numerical choices corresponding to the interaction region length and velocities; not varied.
  • E_0 and dot couplings Γ_L=Γ_R=Γ/2 = E_0=0, Γ_L=Γ_R
    Symmetric, single-level dot reference; chosen for simplicity.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Chiral Luttinger liquid bosonization exactly describes the ν=2 edge states and their density-density interaction.
    Invoked in Sec. II.B, Eqs. (1)-(11); standard for integer Hall edges but a modeling assumption for this device.
  • domain assumption The ac voltage acts purely capacitively on the outer channel only, creating a coherent state of edge-magnetoplasmons.
    Eq. (12) and following; neglects backscattering and dissipative coupling to the drive.
  • domain assumption Tunneling at the quantum point contacts occurs in the absence of electron-electron interactions because of additional screening.
    Assumed in Sec. II.B, paragraph before II.C; necessary for the non-interacting Floquet S-matrix in Eq. (23).
  • domain assumption The quantum dot is described by a single relevant energy level with Breit-Wigner transmission and no intra-dot interaction.
    Sec. II.C, Eqs. (15)-(18); requires level spacing ΔE≈10 K exceeding all other energy scales in the parameter range.
  • domain assumption The exergy in Eqs. (48)-(49) is the correct figure of merit for a hybrid machine.
    Taken from Refs 20, 27, 64, 65; defines the classification of regimes used throughout Sec. V.
  • standard math The p_l(q) coefficients for Lorentzian pulses in Eq. (51) are valid for all l and q.
    Result from Levitov/Lesovik and Glattli work; used to build P_n(q) in Eq. (21).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid interacting quantum Hall thermal machine." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G7WC7OWR

@misc{pith2026241116240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid interacting quantum Hall thermal machine},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G7WC7OWR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16240}
}
abstract

We investigate a hybrid thermal machine based on a single closed quantum Hall edge channel forming a quantum dot. It is tunneling coupled with two quantum Hall states at $\nu = 2$ in contact with reservoirs at different temperatures and chemical potentials. One of these edge states is also driven out-of-equilibrium by means of a periodic train of Lorentzian voltage pulses. This device allows to explore various possible working regimes including the engine, the heat pump and the refrigerator configuration. Regions where two regimes coexist can also be identified. Moreover, the proposed set-up exhibits robustness and in some parameter regions also slightly enhanced performance in the presence of electron-electron interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scheme of the quantum Hall hybrid thermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scheme of a quantum Hall edge state at fill [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Density plots of the exergy Φ in the engine regime ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density plots of the exergy Φ in the heat pump regime ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Density plot of exergy Φ as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Density plot of exergy Φ as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Density plots of Pe (in units of Γ2 /h̵) as a function of µ and ∆µ (in units of Γ), in the non-interacting case (for θ = 0), in panel (a), and with interactions (θ = π/4), in panel (b). The other parameters are: TR = TL = 0.01 Γ/kB, Ω = 2.6 Γ/h̵, τc = 7.5 × 10−12 s, τn…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Density plots of I h L (in units of Γ2 /h̵) as a function of µ (in units of Γ) and TL (in units of Γ/kB) in the non-interacting case (for θ = 0), in panel (a), and with interactions (θ = π/4), in panel (b). The other parameters are: TR = 0.01 Γ/kB, ∆µ = Γ, Ω = 2.6 Γ/h̵…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Density plots of exergy Φ in the engine regime as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Density plot of exergy Φ as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Manzano , author R

    author author G. Manzano , author R. S\'anchez , author R. Silva , author G. Haack , author J. B. \ Brask , author N. Brunner , \ and\ author P. P. \ Potts ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 043302 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043302

  2. [1]

    author author S.Carnot ,\ @noop title Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres à développer cette puissance \ ( publisher Bachelier ,\ address Parigi ,\ year 1824 ) NoStop

  3. [2]

    Fermi ,\ @noop title Thermodynamics \ ( publisher Dover Publications ,\ year 1956 ) NoStop

    author author E. Fermi ,\ @noop title Thermodynamics \ ( publisher Dover Publications ,\ year 1956 ) NoStop

    work page 1956

  4. [3]

    Esposito , author U

    author author M. Esposito , author U. Harbola , \ and\ author S. Mukamel ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1665 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 1665 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1665 2009

  5. [4]

    Campisi , author P

    author author M. Campisi , author P. H\"anggi , \ and\ author P. Talkner ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.771 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 771 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.771 2011

  6. [5]

    Kosloff ,\ 10.3390/e15062100 journal journal Entropy \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2100 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    author author R. Kosloff ,\ 10.3390/e15062100 journal journal Entropy \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2100 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.3390/e15062100 2013

  7. [6]

    Gelbwaser-Klimovsky , author W

    author author D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky , author W. Niedenzu , \ and\ author G. Kurizki \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 2015 )\ pp.\ pages 329--407 NoStop

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Sothmann , author R

    author author B. Sothmann , author R. Sánchez , \ and\ author A. N. \ Jordan ,\ 10.1088/0957-4484/26/3/032001 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 26 ,\ pages 032001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/0957-4484/26/3/032001 2014

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    Campisi \ and\ author R

    author author M. Campisi \ and\ author R. Fazio ,\ 10.1088/1751-8113/49/34/345002 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 49 ,\ pages 345002 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  2. [9]

    Vinjanampathy \ and\ author J

    author author S. Vinjanampathy \ and\ author J. Anders ,\ 10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 journal journal Contemporary Physics \ volume 57 ,\ pages 545 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  3. [10]

    Goold , author M

    author author J. Goold , author M. Huber , author A. Riera , author L. del Rio , \ and\ author P. Skrzypczyk ,\ 10.1088/1751-8113/49/14/143001 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 49 ,\ pages 143001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [11]

    Benenti , author G

    author author G. Benenti , author G. Casati , author K. Saito , \ and\ author R. S. \ Whitney ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.008 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 694 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note fundamental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat t...

    2017 doi

  5. [12]

    author author J. P. \ Pekola \ and\ author B. Karimi ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.041001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 041001 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  6. [13]

    author author G. T. \ Landi \ and\ author M. Paternostro ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035008 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 035008 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  7. [14]

    author author G. T. \ Landi , author D. Poletti , \ and\ author G. Schaller ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045006 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 045006 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  8. [15]

    author author P. P. \ Potts ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19206 title Quantum thermodynamics , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19206 arXiv:2406.19206 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Deffner \ and\ author S

    author author S. Deffner \ and\ author S. Campbell ,\ 10.1088/2053-2571/ab21c6 title Quantum Thermodynamics ,\ 2053-2571\ ( publisher Morgan and Claypool Publishers ,\ year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Bhattacharjee \ and\ author A

    author author S. Bhattacharjee \ and\ author A. Dutta ,\ 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00235-3 journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 94 ( year 2021 ),\ 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00235-3 NoStop

    2021 doi

  11. [18]

    Arrachea ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/acb06b journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 036501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    author author L. Arrachea ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/acb06b journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 036501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  12. [19]

    author author L. M. \ Cangemi , author V. Cataudella , author G. Benenti , author M. Sassetti , \ and\ author G. De Filippis ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.165418 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 165418 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [20]

    Cavaliere , author L

    author author F. Cavaliere , author L. Razzoli , author M. Carrega , author G. Benenti , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106235 journal journal iScience \ volume 26 ,\ pages 106235 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  14. [21]

    Cavaliere , author G

    author author F. Cavaliere , author G. Gemme , author G. Benenti , author D. Ferraro , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1038/s42005-025-01993-7 journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 8 ,\ pages 76 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  15. [22]

    author author L. D. \ Hicks \ and\ author M. S. \ Dresselhaus ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 47 ,\ pages 12727 ( year 1993 a ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  16. [23]

    author author L. D. \ Hicks \ and\ author M. S. \ Dresselhaus ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.16631 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 47 ,\ pages 16631 ( year 1993 b ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  17. [24]

    author author L. D. \ Hicks , author T. C. \ Harman , author X. Sun , \ and\ author M. S. \ Dresselhaus ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R10493 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 53 ,\ pages R10493 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  18. [25]

    Terraneo , author M

    author author M. Terraneo , author M. Peyrard , \ and\ author G. Casati ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.094302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 094302 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  19. [26]

    Li , author J

    author author N. Li , author J. Ren , author L. Wang , author G. Zhang , author P. H\"anggi , \ and\ author B. Li ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1045 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 1045 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    author author M. F. \ Ludovico , author F. Battista , author F. von Oppen , \ and\ author L. Arrachea ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075136 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 075136 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Ryu , author R

    author author S. Ryu , author R. López , author L. Serra , \ and\ author D. Sánchez ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-30039-7 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 2512 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Benenti , author G

    author author G. Benenti , author G. Casati , \ and\ author J. Wang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.070604 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 070604 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    Braggio , author M

    author author A. Braggio , author M. Carrega , author B. Sothmann , \ and\ author R. S\'anchez ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012049 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages L012049 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Bocquillon , author V

    author author E. Bocquillon , author V. Freulon , author F. D. \ Parmentier , author J.-M. \ Berroir , author B. Plaçais , author C. Wahl , author J. Rech , author T. Jonckheere , author T. Martin , author C. Grenier , author D. Ferraro , author P. Degiovanni , \ and\ author G...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Ferraro \ and\ author M

    author author D. Ferraro \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00073-1 booktitle Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition) ,\ editor edited by\ editor T. Chakraborty \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 20...

    doi

  26. [34]

    \ Wen ,\ 10.1080/00018739500101566 journal journal Adv

    author author X.-G. \ Wen ,\ 10.1080/00018739500101566 journal journal Adv. Phys. \ volume 44 ,\ pages 405 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  27. [35]

    von Delft \ and\ author H

    author author J. von Delft \ and\ author H. Schoeller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19985100401 journal journal Annalen der Physik \ volume 510 ,\ pages 225 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  28. [36]

    Grenier , author J

    author author C. Grenier , author J. Dubois , author T. Jullien , author P. Roulleau , author D. C. \ Glattli , \ and\ author P. Degiovanni ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 085302 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author E. V. \ Sukhorukov \ and\ author V. V. \ Cheianov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.156801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 156801 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    author author I. P. \ Levkivskyi \ and\ author E. V. \ Sukhorukov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.045322 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 045322 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  31. [39]

    Degiovanni , author C

    author author P. Degiovanni , author C. Grenier , author G. F\`eve , author C. Altimiras , author H. le Sueur , \ and\ author F. Pierre ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.121302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 81 ,\ pages 121302 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [40]

    Wahl , author J

    author author C. Wahl , author J. Rech , author T. Jonckheere , \ and\ author T. Martin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.046802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 046802 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    Ferraro , author B

    author author D. Ferraro , author B. Roussel , author C. Cabart , author E. Thibierge , author G. F\`eve , author C. Grenier , \ and\ author P. Degiovanni ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.166403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 166403 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author A. O. \ Slobodeniuk , author E. G. \ Idrisov , \ and\ author E. V. \ Sukhorukov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035421 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 035421 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Rebora , author M

    author author G. Rebora , author M. Acciai , author D. Ferraro , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245310 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 245310 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    author author E. G. \ Idrisov , author I. P. \ Levkivskyi , author E. V. \ Sukhorukov , \ and\ author T. L. \ Schmidt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.085405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 085405 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Altimiras , author H

    author author C. Altimiras , author H. le Sueur , author U. Gennser , author A. Cavanna , author D. Mailly , \ and\ author F. Pierre ,\ 10.1038/nphys1429 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 34 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  38. [46]

    Bocquillon , author V

    author author E. Bocquillon , author V. Freulon , author J.-M. \ Berroir , author P. Degiovanni , author B. Plaçais , author A. Cavanna , author Y. Jin , \ and\ author G. Fève ,\ 10.1038/ncomms2788 journal journal Nat.Commun. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1839 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author R. H. \ Rodriguez , author F. D. \ Parmentier , author D. Ferraro , author P. Roulleau , author U. Gennser , author A. Cavanna , author M. Sassetti , author F. Portier , author D. Mailly , \ and\ author P. Roche ,\ 10.1038/s41467-020-16331-4 journal journal Nat. ...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Frigerio , author G

    author author E. Frigerio , author G. Rebora , author M. Ruelle , author H. Souquet-Basiège , author Y. Jin , author U. Gennser , author A. Cavanna , author B. Plaçais , author E. Baudin , author J.-M. \ Berroir , author I. Safi , author P. Degiovanni , author G. Fève , \ and\...

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author E. V. \ Sukhorukov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2015.11.018 journal journal Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures \ volume 77 ,\ pages 191 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    Cr\'epieux , author P

    author author A. Cr\'epieux , author P. Devillard , \ and\ author T. Martin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.205302 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 69 ,\ pages 205302 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  43. [51]

    author author D. L. \ Kovrizhin \ and\ author J. T. \ Chalker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 106403 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    Braggio , author D

    author author A. Braggio , author D. Ferraro , author M. Carrega , author N. Magnoli , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093032 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 093032 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    Rech , author D

    author author J. Rech , author D. Ferraro , author T. Jonckheere , author L. Vannucci , author M. Sassetti , \ and\ author T. Martin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.076801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 076801 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    Vannucci , author F

    author author L. Vannucci , author F. Ronetti , author J. Rech , author D. Ferraro , author T. Jonckheere , author T. Martin , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.245415 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 95 ,\ pages 245415 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  47. [55]

    Safi ,\ 10.1007/s100510051026 journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 12 ,\ pages 451 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    author author I. Safi ,\ 10.1007/s100510051026 journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 12 ,\ pages 451 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  48. [56]

    Ferraro , author F

    author author D. Ferraro , author F. Ronetti , author L. Vannucci , author M. Acciai , author J. Rech , author T. Jockheere , author T. Martin , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1140/epjst/e2018-800074-1 journal journal The European Physical Journal Special Topics \ volume 227 ...

    doi

  49. [57]

    author author R. A. \ Jalabert , author A. D. \ Stone , \ and\ author Y. Alhassid ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3468 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 3468 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  50. [58]

    Alhassid ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.895 journal journal Rev

    author author Y. Alhassid ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.895 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 895 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  51. [59]

    Dubois , author T

    author author J. Dubois , author T. Jullien , author C. Grenier , author P. Degiovanni , author P. Roulleau , \ and\ author D. C. \ Glattli ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 085301 ( year 2013 a ) NoStop

    doi

  52. [60]

    Moskalets \ and\ author M

    author author M. Moskalets \ and\ author M. B\"uttiker ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.035301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 035301 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    Moskalets ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.206801 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Moskalets ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.206801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 206801 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    author author M. V. \ Moskalets ,\ 10.1142/p822 title Scattering Matrix Approach to Non-Stationary Quantum Transport \ ( publisher IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    Battista , author F

    author author F. Battista , author F. Haupt , \ and\ author J. Splettstoesser ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085418 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 085418 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    Lu , author Z

    author author J. Lu , author Z. Wang , author R. Wang , author J. Peng , author C. Wang , \ and\ author J.-H. \ Jiang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.075428 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 107 ,\ pages 075428 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    L\'opez , author J

    author author R. L\'opez , author J. S. \ Lim , \ and\ author K. W. \ Kim ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013038 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 013038 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    author author L. S. \ Levitov , author H. Lee , \ and\ author G. B. \ Lesovik ,\ 10.1063/1.531672 journal journal Journal of Mathematical Physics \ volume 37 ,\ pages 4845 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  59. [67]

    author author D. A. \ Ivanov , author H. W. \ Lee , \ and\ author L. S. \ Levitov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.6839 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 56 ,\ pages 6839 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  60. [68]

    Keeling , author I

    author author J. Keeling , author I. Klich , \ and\ author L. S. \ Levitov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.116403 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 116403 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  61. [69]

    Dubois , author T

    author author J. Dubois , author T. Jullien , author F. Portier , author P. Roche , author A. Cavanna , author Y. Jin , author W. Wegscheider , author P. Roulleau , \ and\ author D. C. \ Glattli ,\ 10.1038/nature12713 journal journal Nature \ volume 502 ,\ pages 659 ( year 201...

    doi

  62. [70]

    Glattli \ and\ author P

    author author D. Glattli \ and\ author P. Roulleau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2015.10.034 journal journal Phys. E \ volume 76 ,\ pages 216 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    Bäuerle , author D

    author author C. Bäuerle , author D. C. \ Glattli , author T. Meunier , author F. Portier , author P. Roche , author P. Roulleau , author S. Takada , \ and\ author X. Waintal ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/aaa98a journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 056503 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  64. [72]

    Aluffi , author T

    author author M. Aluffi , author T. Vasselon , author S. Ouacel , author H. Edlbauer , author C. Geffroy , author P. Roulleau , author D. C. \ Glattli , author G. Georgiou , \ and\ author C. B\"auerle ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.034005 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volum...

    doi

  65. [73]

    author author D. C. \ Glattli \ and\ author P. S. \ Roulleau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201600650 journal journal physica status solidi (b) \ volume 254 ,\ pages 1600650 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    Ferraro , author F

    author author D. Ferraro , author F. Ronetti , author J. Rech , author T. Jonckheere , author M. Sassetti , \ and\ author T. Martin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.155135 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 155135 ( year 2018 b ) NoStop

    doi

  67. [75]

    author author J. C. Y. \ Teo \ and\ author C. L. \ Kane ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235321 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 79 ,\ pages 235321 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  68. [76]

    Str\"om \ and\ author H

    author author A. Str\"om \ and\ author H. Johannesson ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096806 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 096806 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  69. [77]

    Ferraro , author G

    author author D. Ferraro , author G. Dolcetto , author R. Citro , author F. Romeo , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245419 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 245419 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  70. [78]

    author author C. L. \ Kane \ and\ author M. P. A. \ Fisher ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.13449 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 51 ,\ pages 13449 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  71. [79]

    \ Lee , author S

    author author S.-S. \ Lee , author S. Ryu , author C. Nayak , \ and\ author M. P. A. \ Fisher ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.236807 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 236807 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  72. [80]

    Carrega , author D

    author author M. Carrega , author D. Ferraro , author A. Braggio , author N. Magnoli , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/14/2/023017 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 023017 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  73. [81]

    Traverso , author M

    author author S. Traverso , author M. Sassetti , \ and\ author N. Traverso Ziani ,\ 10.1038/s41535-023-00615-1 journal journal npj Quantum Materials \ ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1038/s41535-023-00615-1 NoStop

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.