Twisted vertex algebra modules for irregular connections: A case study

Boris L. Feigin; Simon D. Lentner

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 references

Twisted vertex algebra modules for irregular connections: A case study

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a deformed symplectic-fermion vertex algebra, twisted by an irregular $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-connection, splits as a Virasoro representation into a direct sum of Whittaker modules.

desk verdict Honest, technically solid case study: the Virasoro and Whittaker results are proved and worth reading, but the twisted-module interpretation is explicitly conjectural, so trust the body, not the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16272 v2 pith:TPNCJNRC submitted 2024-11-25 math.QA hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Boris L. Feigin , Simon D. Lentner This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.QAhep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 17B6917B68

keywords vertexoperatoralgebrastwistedmodulesirregularconnectionssymplecticfermionstripletalgebraWhittakerVirasoroBirkhoffnormalform

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a deformation of the symplectic-fermion vertex algebra by an irregular $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-connection on the formal punctured disc, and studies the resulting twisted modules. Its central claim is that, for an irregular singularity of Poisson order 1 with diagonalizable irregular term, the unique simple induced module is, as a representation of the Virasoro algebra, a direct sum of Whittaker modules with explicitly known parameters. The authors present this as the first worked example of a notion of $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted vertex algebra modules that goes beyond the regular-singular case, where twisting is controlled by monodromy. If the framework is correct, it gives a concrete local model for the categories that should fibre over the space of connections in the geometric Langlands program, and it ties irregular vertex-algebra twists to Virasoro Whittaker modules. The authors are explicit that the vertex-algebra interpretation is conjectural; the algebraic results about the deformed Clifford algebra stand on their own.

What carries the argument

The central object is the deformed Clifford algebra $\mathrm{SF}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$, generated by $\psi^\pm_n$ for $n\in\mathbb{Z}$, with anticommutators $\{\psi^a_m,\psi^b_n\}=m(e^a,e^b)\delta_{m+n,0}+\sum_k C^{ab}_k\delta_{m+n=k}$, where the symmetric matrices $C^{ab}_k$ encode the coefficients of the connection. On this algebra one defines a normally ordered Sugawara-type Virasoro action $L^{\mathrm{d}+A}_n$ at central charge $-2$; the key structural fact is that the irregular terms act as shift operators raising the vertical degree, which in the untwisted limit turns the indecomposable projective module into a simple module. The proof of the Whittaker decomposition uses four ingredients: the vectors $v_k=\psi^-_{-(k-1)}\cdots\psi^-_0$ and their mirrors are Whittaker vectors for connections in Birkhoff normal form; a correction argument produces Whittaker vectors $w_k$ without that assumption; a character identity proved by the $q$-Vandermonde identity and a bijection of restricted partitions matches the Fock-space character with the Whittaker character; and the irreducibility of universal Virasoro Whittaker modules promotes the character identity to an isomorphism.

What would settle it

Check whether the full twisted Jacobi identity, or the proposed commutator formula for all modes rather than just $\psi^\pm_{-1}1$, holds for $\mathrm{SF}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$ when $A_1\neq0$; a single failing instance among higher modes would refute the identification of the deformed Clifford algebra with the mode algebra of a genuine $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted vertex algebra module, while leaving Theorem 5.6 intact as a statement about the Clifford algebra.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a connection $\mathrm{d}+A$ with irregular term of Poisson order 1 and diagonalizable leading coefficient, the deformed Clifford algebra $\mathrm{SF}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$ has a unique simple module in the induced category, namely $\mathrm{SF}^{\leq0}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$. Theorem 5.6 asserts that as a Virasoro module, with the Sugawara-type action at central charge $c=-2$, this module is the direct sum over $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ of Whittaker modules generated by vectors $w_k$ satisfying $L^{\mathrm{d}+A}_{n\geq3}w_k=0$, $L^{\mathrm{d}+A}_2w_k=\tfrac12\xi^2w_k$, and $L^{\mathrm{d}+A}_1w_k=\xi(k+\tfrac12\varepsilon)w_k$. The proof combines Whittaker vectors obtained from the Fock-type top vectors of the untwisted theory, a correction argument that removes the Birkhoff-normal-form assumption, a character identity matching the sum of two Fock characters with the sum of Whittaker characters, and the known irreducibility of universal Virasoro Whittaker modules. The authors present this as the first explicit decomposition of a vertex-algebraic module twisted by an irregular connection into Virasoro Whittaker modules.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes, without proof, that its explicitly defined deformed algebra really is the mode algebra of a genuine $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted vertex-algebra module; if that identification fails, the vertex-algebra framing loses its main significance, although the concrete Whittaker decomposition of the deformed algebra would still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The representation category of $\mathrm{SF}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$ for irregular connections of Poisson order 1 is governed by the four-dimensional Clifford algebra $\mathrm{SF}^{01}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$, which is simple whenever $\xi\neq0$; hence there is exactly one simple induced module.
The Virasoro action on the twisted module is a direct sum of Whittaker modules with $L_1$-eigenvalue $\xi(k+\tfrac12\varepsilon)$ varying linearly with the horizontal degree $k$, and the module is simple rather than the indecomposable projective module of the untwisted case.
The decomposition depends only on the formal type of the connection, that is, on its Birkhoff normal form, not on the finer analytic gauge class.
The singular gauge transformation $F(z)=\mathrm{diag}(z,z^{-1})$ acts as spectral flow, shifting the parameter $\varepsilon$ by $-1$, so the family of twisted categories over the space of connections carries a $\mathbb{Z}$-action.
The Sugawara construction yields a Virasoro action at central charge $-2$ for every connection, with $[L_{-1},\psi(z)]=(\partial_z+A(z))\psi(z)$, so the deformed algebra reproduces the connection on the level of modes.
The proposed $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted commutator formula from the literature matches the deformed Clifford relations for the lowest modes, which the authors check explicitly as evidence that the ad-hoc definition is the right one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the conjectural identification of $\mathrm{SF}_{\mathrm{d}+A}$ with genuine $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted vertex algebra modules is completed, the Whittaker decomposition suggests that fusion products of such twisted modules should be computed in the category of Virasoro Whittaker modules, whose fusion rules are not yet known.
A natural test of the framework is to replace the diagonalizable irregular term $A_1$ by a nilpotent one: the paper notes that the Whittaker parameters would degenerate and extensions between Whittaker modules may appear, and one could check whether the simple module remains a direct sum or acquires indecomposable pieces.
The character identities here relate Fock characters to Whittaker characters through an extra fine grading; a similar mechanism might produce explicit isomorphisms for higher Poisson order $N\geq2$ or for larger rank $\mathfrak{g}$, where the shift structure is richer.
Because the theorem depends only on the Birkhoff normal form, the construction predicts that Stokes data enter only in analytic questions such as fusion rules, which would require the still-missing twisted intertwining operators.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know before you read it. First, the advertised vertex-algebraic interpretation is a conjecture, and the authors say so: they check one commutator formula in Lemma 2.3 and prove no twisted Jacobi identity. Second, what is actually proved is a set of clean results about a deformed Clifford algebra SF_{d+A} attached to an sl2-connection: a representation classification for irregular Poisson order 1, a Sugawara-type Virasoro action at central charge c = −2, and the decomposition (Theorem 5.6) of the induced module into Virasoro Whittaker modules. Those results stand on their own.

The Sugawara computation in Lemma 4.3 is the strongest part. The commutator calculation is complete and careful, including the delicate counting of the coboundary term that is absorbed by the constants c_n. The Whittaker decomposition proof is a legitimate strategy: injectivity from irreducibility of universal Whittaker modules, then a q-Vandermonde character identity for bijectivity. I checked the q-powers; they are right. The global definition of SF_∇ via Res(∇f,g) makes the construction look inevitable rather than ad hoc, and the appendix's explicit Stokes computation with the incomplete Gamma function is a concrete, checkable bonus.

The soft spots, in proportion. (1) The abstract and title oversell the vertex-algebraic content relative to the body. The body honestly labels the interpretation conjectural in §1.1 and Remark 1.12, but the abstract says "study its twisted module," which will mislead a casual reader. The missing twisted Jacobi identity is load-bearing for the interpretive claim; the authors flag it, and I do not read this as bad faith, but the abstract should carry the same hedge. (2) Lemma 3.2 has a statement/proof mismatch: the statement concerns vectors killed by SF^{≥2}, while the proof uses annihilation by SF^{≥1}. Easily fixed, currently confusing. (3) The bijectivity step of Theorem 5.6 is compressed: filtration compatibility is asserted from the §4.3 formulas, and the graded character of the Whittaker module is not spelled out. I believe the argument works, but a referee will want those details. (4) Many typos.

The dependence on [FL24] for the definition of SF_{d+A} is real but not circular; the new theorems are proved here.

Who this is for: people working on twisted modules, logarithmic CFT, wild ramification, or Virasoro Whittaker modules. It deserves a serious referee, and the referee should push for the filtration details, the Lemma 3.2 fix, and the abstract rephrasing. I would send it out.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces, for an sl2-connection d+A = d + Σ A_k z^{-k-1} on the formal punctured disc, a deformed Clifford algebra SF_{d+A} (Definition 2.1) with generators ψ^±_n and anticommutators determined by the symplectic form and the matrices A_k. It proposes, conjecturally (§1.1, Remark 1.12), that SF_{d+A} is the mode algebra of a (d+A)-twisted module of the symplectic-fermion vertex algebra. The paper then studies the case of Poisson order 1 with diagonalizable irregular term (Example 2.2). It proves that the subalgebra SF^{01}_{d+A} is a simple Clifford algebra of dimension 16 and that the induced module SF^{≤0}_{d+A} is the unique simple object in a natural category (Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4). It constructs a Sugawara-type Virasoro action at central charge c = -2 (Lemma 4.3) and proves that as a Virasoro representation, SF^{≤0}_{d+A} is a direct sum of Whittaker modules with explicit eigenvalues for L_1 and L_2 (Theorem 5.6). The proof combines a compatible filtration with associated graded L'_n + ξ Shift_{n-1}, q-series identities (Lemmas 5.4 and 5.5), and the irreducibility of universal Whittaker modules (Theorem 5.1).

Significance. If the conjectural vertex-algebra interpretation is eventually established, Theorem 5.6 would provide the first explicit decomposition of a vertex-algebraic module twisted by an irregular connection into Virasoro Whittaker modules, connecting the paper's program with wild ramification, Stokes data, and geometric Langlands. Independently of that conjecture, the paper contains substantial concrete results: the Virasoro commutator computation in Lemma 4.3 is detailed and convincing; the character identity in Lemma 5.4 is proved by an explicit bijection in Lemma 5.5; and the application of [LGZ11] to obtain injectivity of the maps f_k is appropriate. The authors are transparent about the conjectural status of the vertex-algebra interpretation, which is a strength in terms of intellectual honesty, but it leaves the central advertised claim unsupported.

major comments (3)

[§1.1, Remark 1.12, Lemma 2.3] The paper's advertised vertex-algebraic interpretation is not proved. Definition 2.1 defines an ad-hoc Clifford algebra, and Lemma 2.3 only verifies that the proposed commutator formula (2) reproduces the anticommutator relations for the two modes ψ^a_{-1}1 and ψ^b_{-1}1. No twisted Jacobi identity or Borcherds identity is established, no field-state correspondence is constructed, and the authors explicitly call the interpretation conjectural in §1.1 and Remark 1.12. Consequently Theorem 5.6, while a statement about the deformed Clifford algebra, is not yet a theorem about (d+A)-twisted modules of the symplectic-fermion vertex algebra; the claimed novelty of a twisted vertex-algebraic module decomposed into Virasoro Whittaker modules rests on this unproved identification.
[§3.1, Lemma 3.2] The proof that a vector annihilated by SF^{≥2}_{d+A} must lie in V^{01} is too sketchy for a load-bearing step. The argument needs to specify the filtration on Ind(V^{01}), prove that the leading homogeneous component is annihilated by the action of each ψ^±_n, n ≥ 2 on the associated graded, and prove that the common kernel of the resulting (anti-)derivations on the associated graded algebra is trivial. As written, the sentence 'the only polynomial annihilated by all derivations is the zero polynomial' is not a proof in the Clifford (super) setting with the relations among negative modes. Since Corollary 3.4—and hence the statement that SF^{≤0}_{d+A} is the unique simple module used in Theorem 5.6—depends on this lemma, the proof should be completed.
[§5.4] The proof of bijectivity of ∑_k f_k is incomplete. The authors state that the map preserves the filtration by deg_total and that 'our character identity in Lemma 5.4 shows that ∑_k f_k is bijective,' but the graded characters of the domain (direct sum of universal Whittaker modules) and codomain (SF^{≤0}_{d+A}) in the deg_total grading are not written down, and the associated graded map gr(f_k) is not identified. One must show that Lemma 5.4, in the limit M = N = ∞, matches the coefficient-wise dimensions of both spaces in every deg_total and horizontal degree; injectivity plus a character inequality is not sufficient if the filtration is not known to be separated and exhaustive. This gap is load-bearing for Theorem 5.6.

minor comments (4)

[Example 2.2] The phrase 'generated by ψ±0, ψ±0' is a typo; it should presumably read 'generated by ψ±0, ψ±1'.
[§1.2, §5.4] The notation is inconsistent: 'degfine' and 'deg finer' appear alongside 'deg_fine' and 'deg_total'; the intended subscript notation should be used uniformly.
[§3.3] The statement that gauge transformations in SL2((z)) preserve SF^{≥k}_{d+A} is false if SL2((z)) means formal Laurent series, as Example 2.7 itself shows; the authors should either restrict to SL2[[z]] or clarify the meaning of SL2((z)).
[References] The reference [ALZ16] appears in the bibliography but is not cited in the text; it should either be cited where relevant or removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 5.6 is proved from the explicit Clifford relations, external Whittaker irreducibility, and independent q-series identities; self-citation appears only in the conjectural vertex-algebra framing.

full rationale

The central technical result, Theorem 5.6, does not reduce to a fit or to a self-citation. The module SF_{d+A} is fixed by Definition 2.1 as a Clifford algebra with anticommutator determined by the connection coefficients, the Virasoro action is constructed in Lemma 4.3 with the constants c_2 = (1/2)xi^2 and c_1 = (1/2)xi epsilon computed rather than fitted, and the Whittaker eigenvalues in Theorem 5.6 are read off from those formulas. Injectivity uses the external irreducibility theorem of Lu-Guo-Zhao [LGZ11] (quoted as Theorem 5.1), and bijectivity uses the independently proven q-Vandermonde character identity in Lemma 5.4. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only self-citation is in the framing: Remark 1.12 says the explicit definition of SF_{d+A} was obtained in the authors' earlier [FL24] as a fibre of a vertex algebra with big center, and Section 1.1 explicitly states that the vertex-algebra interpretation 'should be considered conjectural.' This is a missing proof, not a circular reduction: the self-cited construction is not used to prove Theorem 5.6, which proceeds from the explicit defining relations and independent external results. I also flag as a limitation, rather than as circularity, that Lemma 2.3 checks the proposed twisted commutator formula only for the modes psi^a_{-1}1 and psi^b_{-1}1, and no full twisted Jacobi or Borcherds identity is proved; this affects the advertised vertex-algebraic interpretation but does not make the main theorem equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the ad-hoc definition of SF_{d+A}, the semisimplicity and Poisson-order-1 restriction, the external irreducibility theorem for Whittaker modules, and a filtration compatibility statement that is not fully proved. No parameters are fitted to data; ξ, ε, τ± are inputs defining the connection.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper Definition 2.1 of SF_{d+A} is accepted as the mode algebra of a (d+A)-twisted module; the full twisted Jacobi identity is not proved.
Only the commutator formula for ψ^±_{-1} is checked (Lemma 2.3); the authors call the vertex-algebra interpretation conjectural in §1.1 and Remark 1.12. This is load-bearing for the paper's framing.
domain assumption The irregular term A1 is semisimple and the connection has Poisson order 1, so a Birkhoff normal form with diagonal leading term applies.
Used throughout Example 2.2 and Theorem 5.6; nilpotent A1 and higher Poisson orders are explicitly outside the main result.
standard math Universal Virasoro Whittaker modules M(a1,a2) are irreducible whenever (a1,a2) is not (0,0).
Imported from [LGZ11] Theorem 7 and used in §5.4 to obtain injectivity of the maps f_k; the parameters in this paper have a2 = 1/2 ξ² ≠ 0.
ad hoc to paper The filtration deg_total = deg_vert + deg_fine is compatible with the Virasoro action, and its associated graded is described by L'_n + ξ Shift_{n-1}.
Stated in §5.4 but not fully proved; the character identity then controls the associated graded and yields bijectivity of the map from the Whittaker modules.

invented entities (1)

SF_{d+A}
purpose: Deformed Clifford algebra whose generators model (d+A)-twisted modules for the symplectic fermion or triplet p=2 vertex algebra.
It is the central new algebraic object, imported from [FL24] and defined by generators and relations; its status as a genuine twisted vertex algebra module is not established externally.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twisted vertex algebra modules for irregular connections: A case study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TPNCJNRC

@misc{pith2026241116272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twisted vertex algebra modules for irregular connections: A case study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TPNCJNRC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16272}
}

abstract

A vertex algebra with an action of a group $G$ comes with a notion of $g$-twisted modules, forming a $G$-crossed braided tensor category. For a Lie group $G$, one might instead wish for a notion of $(\mathrm{d}+A)$-twisted modules for any $\mathfrak{g}$-connection on the formal punctured disc. For connections with a regular singularity, this reduces to $g$-twisted modules, where $g$ is the monodromy around the puncture. The case of an irregular singularity is much richer and involved, and we are not aware that it has appeared in vertex algebra language. The present article is intended to spark such a treatment, by providing a list of expectations and an explicit worked-through example with interesting applications. Concretely, we consider the vertex super algebra of symplectic fermions, or equivalently the triplet vertex algebra $\mathcal{W}_p(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ for $p=2$, and study its twisted module with respect to irregular $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-connections. We first determine the category of representations, depending on the formal type of the connection. Then we prove that a Sugawara type construction gives a Virasoro action and we prove that as Virasoro modules our representations are direct sums of Whittaker modules. Conformal field theory with irregular singularities resp. wild ramification appear in the context of geometric Langlands correspondence, and in particular in work by Witten, higher dimensional field theories and AGT correspondence. Our original motivation comes from semiclassical limits of the generalized quantum Langlands kernel, which fibres over the space of connections [FL24], similar to the affine Lie algebra at critical level. Our present article now describes, in the smallest case, the fibres of this category over irregular connections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16272 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Some decendents of v in the (d + A)-twisted module. The curved arrows are the new terms. ψ + 0 , ψ− 0 and ψ − 0 ψ +. In particular already in the untwisted case L0 acts by a Jordan block and also L−1 act nonzero. Now if we apply L d+A 0 again to L d+A 0 v then L0 acts by zero, but we have one new term: (L d+A 0 ) 2 v = ξ Shift−1(ψ − 0 ψ + 0 )v = ξ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Some decendents of ψ − 0 in the (d + A)-twisted module. The curved arrows are the new terms. We recall that, for the Virasoro algebra, for any choice of 1-dimensional representation α : Vir≥1 → C we define a Whittaker vector vα of type α by the condition Lnvα = anvα, n ≥ 1 for an = α(Ln). Differently said, vα spans the 1-dimensional representation of Vir≥1 . For the Virasoro algebra, the commutator relation forces a… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

6 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

[FL24] B. L. Feigin and S. D. Lentner, Vertex algebras with big center and a Kazhdan-Lusztig Corre - spondence (accepted for publication in AIM) (2024), arXiv arXiv:2210.13337 ↑1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 17 [Wit08] E. Witten, Gauge theory and wild ramiﬁcation , Anal. Appl. (Singap.) 6 (2008), no. 4, 429–501, DOI 10.1142/S0219530508001195. MR 2459120 ↑1, 5, 6 [FFTL...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[17]

Sugimoto, On the Feigin-Tipunin conjecture , Selecta Math

MR 4184294 ↑4 [Sug21] S. Sugimoto, On the Feigin-Tipunin conjecture , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 27 (2021), no. 5, Paper No. 86, 43, DOI 10.1007/s00029-021-00662-1. MR 4305499 ↑4 [CLR23] T. Creutzig, S. Lentner, and M. Rupert, An algebraic theory for logarithmic Kazhdan-Lusztig correspondences (2023), arXiv 2306.11492 ↑4 [AM08] D. Adamovi´ c and A. Milas, On th...

arXiv 2021
[1988]

Huang, Generalized twisted modules associated to general automor phisms of a vertex operator algebra, Comm

MR 0996026 ↑3 [Hua10] Y.-Z. Huang, Generalized twisted modules associated to general automor phisms of a vertex operator algebra, Comm. Math. Phys. 298 (2010), no. 1, 265–292, DOI 10.1007/s00220-010- 0999-6. MR 2657819 ↑3, 13 [Bak16] B. Bakalov, Twisted logarithmic modules of vertex algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 345 (2016), no. 1, 355–383, DOI 10.1007/s002...

work page arXiv 2010
[1998]

MR 1634067 ↑11, 29 [FF93] B

Reprint of the 1976 origina l. MR 1634067 ↑11, 29 [FF93] B. Feigin and E. Frenkel, Coinvariants of nilpotent subalgebras of the Virasoro alge bra and partition identities , I. M. Gel ′fand Seminar, Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 16, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993, pp. 139–148. MR 1237828 ↑11 [Gau98] W. Gautschi, The incomplete gamma functions sin...

work page 1976
[2004]

van Ekeren and R

MR 2058353 ↑8 [vEH24] J. van Ekeren and R. Heluani, The ﬁrst chiral homology group , Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), no. 8, Paper No. 194, 84, DOI 10.1007/s00220-024-05 061-z. MR 4779563 ↑8 [OW09] M. Ondrus and E. Wiesner, Whittaker modules for the Virasoro algebra , J. Algebra Appl. 8 (2009), no. 3, 363–377, DOI 10.1142/S0219498809003370. MR 2535995 ↑26, 2...

arXiv 2024
[2022]

MR 4464221 ↑5 [CDGG24] T

Thesis (Ph.D.)–Harvard Universit y. MR 4464221 ↑5 [CDGG24] T. Creutzig, T. Dimofte, N. Garner, and N. Geer, A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 28 (2024), no. 1, 161–405. MR 4788097 ↑5 [Kin24] P. Kinnear, Non-semisimple Crane-Yetter varying over the character st ack (2024), arXiv 2404.19667 ↑5 [ENO10] P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Os...

arXiv 2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

[FL24] B. L. Feigin and S. D. Lentner, Vertex algebras with big center and a Kazhdan-Lusztig Corre - spondence (accepted for publication in AIM) (2024), arXiv arXiv:2210.13337 ↑1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 17 [Wit08] E. Witten, Gauge theory and wild ramiﬁcation , Anal. Appl. (Singap.) 6 (2008), no. 4, 429–501, DOI 10.1142/S0219530508001195. MR 2459120 ↑1, 5, 6 [FFTL...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[2] [17]

Sugimoto, On the Feigin-Tipunin conjecture , Selecta Math

MR 4184294 ↑4 [Sug21] S. Sugimoto, On the Feigin-Tipunin conjecture , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 27 (2021), no. 5, Paper No. 86, 43, DOI 10.1007/s00029-021-00662-1. MR 4305499 ↑4 [CLR23] T. Creutzig, S. Lentner, and M. Rupert, An algebraic theory for logarithmic Kazhdan-Lusztig correspondences (2023), arXiv 2306.11492 ↑4 [AM08] D. Adamovi´ c and A. Milas, On th...

arXiv 2021

[3] [1988]

Huang, Generalized twisted modules associated to general automor phisms of a vertex operator algebra, Comm

MR 0996026 ↑3 [Hua10] Y.-Z. Huang, Generalized twisted modules associated to general automor phisms of a vertex operator algebra, Comm. Math. Phys. 298 (2010), no. 1, 265–292, DOI 10.1007/s00220-010- 0999-6. MR 2657819 ↑3, 13 [Bak16] B. Bakalov, Twisted logarithmic modules of vertex algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 345 (2016), no. 1, 355–383, DOI 10.1007/s002...

work page arXiv 2010

[4] [1998]

MR 1634067 ↑11, 29 [FF93] B

Reprint of the 1976 origina l. MR 1634067 ↑11, 29 [FF93] B. Feigin and E. Frenkel, Coinvariants of nilpotent subalgebras of the Virasoro alge bra and partition identities , I. M. Gel ′fand Seminar, Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 16, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993, pp. 139–148. MR 1237828 ↑11 [Gau98] W. Gautschi, The incomplete gamma functions sin...

work page 1976

[5] [2004]

van Ekeren and R

MR 2058353 ↑8 [vEH24] J. van Ekeren and R. Heluani, The ﬁrst chiral homology group , Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), no. 8, Paper No. 194, 84, DOI 10.1007/s00220-024-05 061-z. MR 4779563 ↑8 [OW09] M. Ondrus and E. Wiesner, Whittaker modules for the Virasoro algebra , J. Algebra Appl. 8 (2009), no. 3, 363–377, DOI 10.1142/S0219498809003370. MR 2535995 ↑26, 2...

arXiv 2024

[6] [2022]

MR 4464221 ↑5 [CDGG24] T

Thesis (Ph.D.)–Harvard Universit y. MR 4464221 ↑5 [CDGG24] T. Creutzig, T. Dimofte, N. Garner, and N. Geer, A QFT for non-semisimple TQFT , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 28 (2024), no. 1, 161–405. MR 4788097 ↑5 [Kin24] P. Kinnear, Non-semisimple Crane-Yetter varying over the character st ack (2024), arXiv 2404.19667 ↑5 [ENO10] P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Os...

arXiv 2024