Observation of quantized vortex in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate at Dirac point with emergent spin-orbit coupling

Cheng Chin; Jing Zhang; Wei Han; Wenxin Yang; Yunda Li; Zengming Meng

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Observation of quantized vortex in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate at Dirac point with emergent spin-orbit coupling

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Bose-Einstein condensate parked at the Dirac point of an optical honeycomb lattice develops a quantized vortex in its momentum distribution, produced by a harmonic-trap-induced gauge potential.

desk verdict A credible experiment with a genuinely new momentum-space gauge-potential trick, but the central vortex claim rests on an interference node, not a phase measurement, and the paper's own sign conventions do not support the stated topological charge. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16287 v3 pith:A6T2UX4O submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

Yunda Li , Wei Han , Zengming Meng , Wenxin Yang , Cheng Chin , Jing Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 03.75.Lm03.75.Mn

keywords quantizedvortexDiracpointopticalhoneycomblatticeBose-Einsteincondensatesyntheticspin-orbitcouplinggaugepotentialtopologicaldefectphasediagram

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the direct observation of quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate prepared at the Dirac point of an optical honeycomb lattice. By adiabatically moving the condensate from the band minimum $\Gamma_0$ to the Dirac point $K_0$ with a harmonic trap on, the authors prepare a pseudo-spin state whose spin-down component carries a phase winding $e^{i\theta}$, i.e., a vortex of topological charge $l=-1$. In time-of-flight images the vortex appears as a dark density hole with a directional opening in the three momentum components of the first Brillouin zone, in agreement with the theoretical state $\Psi_s = (1,-i e^{i\theta})^T$ and its $\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{ad}} = \mathbf{e}_\theta/(2k)$ gauge potential. The same setup yields a phase diagram in which a vortex-bearing superfluid sits between the regular superfluid and a Mott insulator, controlled by lattice depth and trap frequency.

What carries the argument

The central object is the momentum-space gauge potential $\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{ad}} = \mathbf{e}_\theta/(2k)$ that the harmonic trap induces when the condensate sits in the pseudo-spin-1/2 Rashba Hamiltonian $H_{\mathrm{so}} = (\hbar^2 k_0/2m)(k_y\sigma_x - k_x\sigma_y)$. Its line integral around the Dirac point equals $\pi\hbar$, which puts the $e^{i\theta}$ winding into the spin-down component of the adiabatically prepared state and makes the phase singularity a quantized vortex. The same potential also produces a density hole in the scalar wavefunction $\psi_0(k)$ when the trap is sufficiently strong, and that hole is what allows the phase singularity to enter the condensate at moderate energy cost. The three-mode effective Hamiltonian and its unitary transformations are the scaffolding that connects these dressed-state quantities to the three momentum components seen in time-of-flight images.

What would settle it

Measure the momentum-space phase profile of the spin-down component with a phase-sensitive probe, such as matter-wave interferometry or a four-wave-mixing heterodyne reconstruction, and check whether the phase winds by $2\pi$ around the dark hole at $K_0$ and by $-2\pi$ at $K'_0$; if the phase does not wind, the hole is a density effect rather than a quantized vortex.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a $^{87}$Rb Bose–Einstein condensate loaded into a graphene-like optical honeycomb lattice, the paper claims that adiabatically transporting the condensate from the $\Gamma_0$ point to a Dirac point $K_0$ creates a quantized vortex in momentum space. The effective low-energy Hamiltonian near the Dirac point takes the Rashba spin-orbit-coupling form $H_{\mathrm{so}} = (\hbar^2 k_0/2m)(k_y\sigma_x - k_x\sigma_y)$, and the harmonic trapping potential in the $x$–$y$ plane does not commute with this pseudo-spin-orbit coupling. That noncommutativity generates a momentum-space gauge potential $\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{ad}} = \mathbf{e}_\theta/(2k)$ whose circulation around the Dirac point gives a flux of $\pi\hbar$, imprinting a phase winding $e^{i\theta}$ on the spin-down component of the prepared state $\Psi_s = (1,-i e^{i\theta})^T$. The paper identifies this winding as a quantum vortex of topological charge $l=-1$, and the opposite winding at the inequivalent Dirac point $K'_0$; the vortex is observed as a dark density hole with a directional opening $\alpha = 0$ in the three momentum components of time-of-flight images, and a measured phase diagram locates a vortex-bearing superfluid phase between the ordinary superfluid and a Mott insulator.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the dark hole as a quantized vortex assumes that it is a genuine phase singularity with winding $e^{i\theta}$, not merely a density artifact; the paper matches the hole's shape and opening to the predicted state but does not measure the phase winding directly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A BEC at a Dirac point carries a quantized vortex in its momentum distribution without any stirring or real-space winding potential.
The harmonic trap acts as the analogue of the kinetic-energy operator in momentum space, so the trap geometry controls the gauge potential and thereby the vortex charge and structure.
The measured phase diagram shows a vortex-bearing superfluid phase distinct from the ordinary superfluid and the Mott insulator, with boundaries set by lattice depth and trap frequency.
Because the mechanism relies only on the topological singularity of the band structure, it should transfer to other optical lattices with Dirac or Weyl points, including twisted-bilayer lattices with flat bands near the Dirac point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the winding is real, the same adiabatic gauge-potential mechanism should generate higher-order vortices at multi-fold band degeneracies, such as a charge-2 vortex at a quadratic band touching point.
Shaping the harmonic trap (anisotropy, anharmonicity) could engineer $\mathbf{A}_{\mathrm{ad}}$ directly, offering a route to momentum-space vortex lattices or fractional vortices without changing the lattice geometry.
The vortex phase boundary in the paper's phase diagram suggests a threshold for phase-singularity entry that likely depends on interaction strength and atom number; an experiment tuning the $s$-wave scattering length via a Feshbach resonance could test that dependence, which the paper does not report.
A momentum-space vortex should leave an imprint in density-density correlations or Bragg scattering of the condensate, providing an independent probe that does not rely on time-of-flight projection.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The headline result is real: this is the first cold-atom experiment to report vortex formation at a Dirac point, and the harmonic-trap-induced momentum-space gauge potential is a genuinely new method. The data look credible, lifetimes are measured honestly, the phase diagram has error bars, and the effective three-band model with Rashba spin-orbit coupling is clearly derived. The comparison between the observed density hole and the model prediction is a legitimate consistency test, not a fit. That said, the central claim is overstated. What is actually imaged is a dark interference line in three momentum components, which is the density pattern from a spinor whose spin-down component has a phase winding. The density itself is invariant under theta to -theta, so the images cannot distinguish charge +1 from -1. The paper assigns l=-1 for K0 without a phase measurement. That is a real gap. More troubling, the paper's own equations do not support the quoted spinor. For the stated Hamiltonian H_D = (k_y sigma_x - k_x sigma_y) nu0, the eigenstates with eigenvalues +/- nu0 k are (1, +/- i e^{-i theta}), not (1, -/+ i e^{i theta}) as written in Fig. 1b and Eq. (32). The spinor (1, -i e^{i theta}) used for K0 is not an eigenstate of H_D. This is not a matter of convention: it changes the predicted sign of the vortex. The paper also claims the lower branch is the one prepared, but the quoted state is the upper branch. No justification is given for this branch switch. These are internal contradictions, not just missing details. The phase diagram's SF/vortex/MI boundary is visually classified, which is soft but minor. The central issue is that the topological charge is assigned from a density feature and a theoretically assumed winding, not from a direct phase measurement. Who should read this: anyone working on synthetic gauge fields or Dirac-point physics in quantum gases will want to know about the gauge-potential mechanism. But they should not take the vortex charge as established. I would send it to peer review because the method is novel and the experiment is well executed, but the authors need to either add phase-sensitive detection or substantially soften the claim and fix the sign errors. As it stands, the 'direct observation' of a quantized vortex is not proven.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on a 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensate loaded into the lowest band of an optical honeycomb lattice and then adiabatically transferred to the Dirac point K0 (or K0'). In time-of-flight images the condensate shows a dark density line with a directional opening in each of three momentum components. The authors interpret this as the interference signature of the spinor state Ψs = (1, −i e^{iθ})^T, whose spin-down component carries a phase winding that they identify as a quantized vortex with topological charge l = −1. They also map a phase diagram as a function of lattice depth and harmonic trap frequency, identifying superfluid, vortex, and Mott-insulator regions. The theoretical modelling uses a three-band effective Hamiltonian near K0, a reduction to an effective Rashba (or Dresselhaus) spin-orbit Hamiltonian, and a gauge-potential argument based on the non-commutativity of the harmonic trap with the spin-orbit coupling.

Significance. If the vortex interpretation is correct, the paper would demonstrate a new and generic mechanism for generating quantized vortices in a bosonic quantum gas from a momentum-space Dirac singularity, and would provide a momentum-space analogue of real-space topological manipulation. The manuscript includes numerical simulations of the density and phase patterns and a phase diagram showing where the vortex feature appears; these are valuable assets, and the model is not fitted to the images in a way that would make the comparison circular. However, the central 'direct observation' claim rests on interpreting a density node as a phase winding, and the manuscript has load-bearing internal inconsistencies in the sign of the vortex charge and in the branch of the Dirac cone used for the adiabatic preparation. These issues must be resolved before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[Fig. 3a and Supplement Eqs. (32)-(33)] The observed dark line is a density zero of |e^{iβ_A} − i e^{iβ_B} e^{iθ}|^2, which is an interference node between the two pseudo-spin components in the bare-state basis, not a direct image of a phase singularity. The density pattern of each momentum component is a cosine in θ, and the location of the zero depends on the constant phases β_A and β_B as well as on the sign of the winding. Consequently, the data as presented cannot by themselves distinguish a vortex with charge +1 from one with charge −1, nor establish that the density hole is a phase defect rather than a density artifact. An interferometric phase measurement or phase reconstruction is needed to substantiate the claim of direct vortex observation; otherwise the claim should be weakened to consistency with the model.
[Eq. (32) and Fig. 3a caption] The spinor quoted for K0 is Ψs = (1, −i e^{iθ})^T, whose lower component has a phase winding e^{+iθ}; in the standard convention this is a vortex with positive topological charge (winding number +1), i.e., orbital angular momentum +ℏ. The paper instead labels the K0 vortex as l = −1 and says that K0 and K0′ have opposite signs of the topological charge, with e^{-iθ} for K0′. As written, the charge assignment and the phase winding are inconsistent: either the spinor should contain e^{-iθ} for l = −1, or the label should be l = +1. This is not a matter of convention choice, because the opening direction in the bare-state density is used to select the sign of the prefactor −i relative to the phase winding, and the sign of the vortex charge is a central quantitative claim.
[Supplement around Eqs. (24), (27)-(28), (32)] The adiabatic preparation from the ground state at Γ0 should, in the standard band structure, place the condensate in the lower branch of the Dirac cone, which in the notation of the manuscript is φ_− = (1, +i e^{iθ})^T, not the upper branch φ_+ = (1, −i e^{iθ})^T used in Eq. (32). The manuscript does not justify why the upper branch is selected during the adiabatic transfer; the harmonic trap may change the level ordering, but no such analysis is provided. This matters because the predicted opening angle α = 0, and hence the claimed agreement with the experimental images, depends on which branch is used. The authors should either demonstrate that the trap prepares the upper branch or explain why the lower-branch state would nonetheless produce the observed orientation.
[Supplement Eq. (28) and main text around Eq. (1)] The derivation attributes the vortex to a gauge potential A_ad = e_θ/(2k) with an Aharonov-Bohm flux of π, but the phase winding in the prepared state is e^{iθ}, which has a total winding of 2π. The e^{iθ} factor in Eq. (32) actually comes from the spinor eigenvector of the Rashba Hamiltonian (the first column of the unitary U), not from the flux of A_ad, while the text speaks of the gauge potential generating the vortex. This conceptual mismatch should be clarified: the role of the gauge potential (and of the density hole it creates via the 1/k^2 centrifugal term) is distinct from the origin of the 2π phase winding. The current presentation conflates the two and does not explain how a π flux leads to a 2π winding.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract] The phrase 'especially topological flat band near Dirac point for twisted bilayer optical lattices' is grammatically incomplete and should be rephrased.
[Main text, section 2] There is a typo 'the the pseudo-spin-orbit coupling' (third paragraph after Eq. (1)); it should read 'the pseudo-spin-orbit coupling'.
[Fig. 1] The phase plots in Fig. 1b show a 2π winding that is labelled in panel (c) as l = −1; the label is inconsistent with the phase winding shown, which has winding number +1 for K0.
[Main text, Fig. 3 and text] The angle α is defined only in the Supplemental Material; the main text should define it explicitly when it is first used in the magnified image of Fig. 3a.
[Supplement, Eq. (8)] The parameter Λ is introduced as the coupling strength, but its relation to the lattice depth V0 (Λ = V0/9 or similar) appears only implicitly; a brief statement of this relation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted vortex state is derived from the effective Hamiltonian and compared with TOF images, without fitting the winding to the data.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction—a quantized vortex with e^{iθ} winding in the spin-down component—is derived from the honeycomb-lattice Hamiltonian via a three-mode expansion (Supplement Eqs. S3–S10), a unitary dressing transformation (Eq. S9), and a second-order reduction to Rashba spin-orbit coupling (Eqs. S13–S15). The harmonic-trap gauge potential A_ad = e_θ/(2k) follows from the unitary rotation U(k) of Eq. S24, not from an ansatz fitted to the images. The observed TOF density pattern is then computed from the derived spinor Ψ_s = (1,−i e^{iθ})^T (Eqs. S32–S33) and compared with the images as a consistency test; the opening angle α=0 is a calculated consequence of the derived phases, not a fitted parameter. No parameter is fitted to the vortex images, and no load-bearing conclusion rests on a self-citation. Concerns that the vortex charge is inferred from a density node rather than a direct phase measurement, and the apparent sign convention between e^{iθ} and the stated l=−1, are correctness or interpretation issues rather than circular reductions. Minor self-citations (e.g., Ref. [30] for twisted-bilayer lattices) appear only in the outlook and are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The vortex mechanism rests on a single-particle effective Hamiltonian with a small number of physical inputs (lattice depth, trap frequency, momentum spread). The momentum spread and the visual phase-boundary criterion are the main adjustable inputs, while the gauge potential and pseudo-spin basis are emergent descriptions rather than freely fitted entities. The adiabaticity and the phase-singularity interpretation of the density hole are the key assumptions that carry the central claim.

free parameters (2)

Momentum spread rho of the condensate = approximately 0.2 k_R (assumed)
Numerical simulations of vortex dynamics (Figs. S8 and S9) use a Gaussian momentum distribution with spread rho; it is estimated from the experimental momentum width rather than fitted to the vortex outcome, but it affects the simulated density profiles.
Vortex/phase-boundary identification criterion = visual, no numeric threshold
The superfluid-vortex phase boundary is determined by visually checking for a density hole in TOF images (Supplement, experimental sequence); this subjective criterion affects the shape of the Fig. 4a phase diagram.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The noninteracting three-mode effective Hamiltonian (Supplement Eq. 8) describes the BEC dynamics near K0.
Atom-atom interactions are omitted from the vortex generation model and phase diagram calculation; the paper treats the condensate as a single-particle wavefunction.
domain assumption Only three diffraction orders around K0 are resonantly coupled.
The authors state that Eq. (8) is valid only for a small momentum deviation k around K0; this truncation is required for the spin-orbit-coupling mapping.
domain assumption The Raman transfer from Gamma0 to K0 is adiabatic and preserves the dressed eigenstate, with no spin flips.
The vortex protocol requires the atoms to remain in the local eigenstate during the 0.8 ms lattice acceleration; the gauge potential appears only under this adiabatic assumption.
domain assumption The dark density hole in the TOF image is a phase singularity, not a density artifact.
The paper identifies the vortex by matching the observed directional opening to the theoretical state Psi_s = (1, -i e^{i theta})^T; no interferometric phase measurement is shown.

invented entities (1)

Momentum-space gauge potential A_ad = e_theta/(2k) independent evidence
purpose: Imprints a pi*hbar Aharonov-Bohm flux at the Dirac point, creating the e^{i theta} phase winding in the spin-down component.
It is an emergent, not fundamental, quantity; the supporting evidence is the matching density hole in TOF images and the model, but there is no direct phase measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of quantized vortex in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate at Dirac point with emergent spin-orbit coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A6T2UX4O

@misc{pith2026241116287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of quantized vortex in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate at Dirac point with emergent spin-orbit coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A6T2UX4O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16287}
}

read the original abstract

When two or more energy bands become degenerate at a singular point in the momentum space, such singularity, or ``Dirac points", gives rise to intriguing quantum phenomena as well as unusual material properties. Systems at the Dirac points can possess topological charges and their unique properties can be probed by various methods, such as transport measurement, interferometry and momentum spectroscopy. While the topology of Dirac point in the momentum space is well studied theoretically, observation of topological defects in a many-body quantum systems at Dirac point remain an elusive goal. Based on atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in a graphene-like optical honeycomb lattice, we directly observe emergence of quantized vortices at the Dirac point. The phase diagram of lattice bosons at the Dirac point is revealed. Our work provides a new way of generating vortices in a quantum gas, and the method is generic and can be applied to different types of optical lattices with topological singularity, especially twisted bilayer optical lattices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16287 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Topologically nontrivial and trivial flat bands via weak and strong interlayer coupling in twisted bilayer honeycomb optical lattices for ultracold atoms
cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

At a critical interlayer coupling, a twisted bilayer honeycomb optical lattice develops an isolated topological flat band at the Dirac point over a wide range of twist angles, while stronger coupling generates trivial...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

This condition corresponds to the two-photon Bragg transition frequencyω B between lattice beams 2 and 1 (3)

of the lowest band we set the frequency detunings of the lattice beams as ∆ω 2 =±4E R/h(+ forK 0 and− forK ′ 0). This condition corresponds to the two-photon Bragg transition frequencyω B between lattice beams 2 and 1 (3). The quadratic energy-momentum dispersion of the massive atoms defines a unique energy difference ωB = 4E R/ℏ, which just matches the s...

work page
[2]

Q., Qian, T

Lv, B. Q., Qian, T. & Ding, H. Experimental perspective on three-dimensional topological semimetals.Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

Ong, N. P. & Liang, S. Experimental signatures of the chiral anomaly in Dirac-Weyl semimetals.Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 394–404 (2021)

work page 2021
[4]

Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater.6, 183–191 (2007)

work page 2007
[5]

H., Guinea, F., Peres, N

Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic prop- erties of graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109–162 (2009)

work page 2009
[6]

& Westervelt, R

Schliemann, J., Loss, D. & Westervelt, R. M. Zitterbewe- gung of electronic wave packets in III-V zinc-blende semi- conductor quantum wells.Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 206801 (2005)

work page 2005
[7]

Observing Zitterbewegung for photons near the Dirac point of a two-dimensional photonic crystal

Zhang, X. Observing Zitterbewegung for photons near the Dirac point of a two-dimensional photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 113903 (2008)

work page 2008
[8]

I., Novoselov, K

Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene.Nat. Phys. 2, 620–625 (2013)

work page 2013

Show all 49 references

[9]

W., Stormer, H

Zhang, Y., Tan, Y. W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Ex- perimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene.Nature438, 201–204 (2005)

2005
[10]

Polini, M., Guinea, F., Lewenstein, M., Manoharan, H. C. & Pellegrini, V. Artificial honeycomb lattices for electrons, atoms and photons.Nat. Nanotech.8, 625–633 (2013)

2013
[11]

Peleg, O.et al.Conical diffraction and gap solitons in honeycomb photonic lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 103901 (2007)

2007
[12]

Song, D.et al.Controlled generation of pseudospin- mediated vortices in photonic graphene.2D Mater.2, 034007 (2015)

2015
[13]

Commun.6, 6272 (2015)

Song, D.et al.Unveiling pseudospin and angular mo- 7 mentum in photonic graphene.Nat. Commun.6, 6272 (2015)

2015
[14]

Phys.7, 434– 440 (2011)

Soltan-Panahi, P.et al.Multi-component quantum gases in spin-dependent hexagonal lattices.Nat. Phys.7, 434– 440 (2011)

2011
[15]

& Esslinger, T

Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Jotzu, G. & Esslinger, T. Creating, moving and merging Dirac points with a Fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice.Nature 483, 302–305 (2012)

2012
[16]

Duca, L.et al.An Aharonov-Bohm interferometer for determining Bloch band topology.Science347, 288–292 (2015)

2015
[17]

Science352, 1094–1097 (2016)

Li, T.et al.Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines. Science352, 1094–1097 (2016)

2016
[18]

D.et al.Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure.Science377, 1319–1322 (2022)

Brown, C. D.et al.Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure.Science377, 1319–1322 (2022)

2022
[19]

Fl¨ aschner, N.et al.Experimental reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band.Science352, 1091–1094 (2016)

2016
[20]

& Sengstock, K

Weinberg, M., Staarmann, C., ¨Olschl¨ ager, C., Simonet, J. & Sengstock, K. Breaking inversion symmetry in a state-dependent honeycomb lattice: artificial graphene with tunable band gap.2D Mater.3, 024005 (2016)

2016
[21]

Tarnowski, M.et al.Observation of topological Bloch- state defects and their merging transition.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 240403 (2017)

2017
[22]

Phys.14, 265–268 (2018)

Fl¨ aschner, N.et al.Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology.Nat. Phys.14, 265–268 (2018)

2018
[23]

Tarnowski, M.et al.Measuring topology from dynamics by obtaining the Chern number from a linking number. Nat. Commun.10, 1728 (2019)

2019
[24]

Wen, K.et al.Experimental study of tune-out wave- lengths for spin-dependent optical lattice in 87Rb Bose- Einstein condensation.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, 3269–3276 (2021)

2021
[25]

& Dalibard, J

Juzeli¯ unas, G., Ruseckas, J. & Dalibard, J. Generalized Rashba-Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for cold atoms. Phys. Rev. A81, 053403 (2010)

2010
[26]

L., Juzeli¯ unas, G

Campbell, D. L., Juzeli¯ unas, G. & Spielman, I. B. Real- istic Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for neu- tral atoms.Phys. Rev. A84, 025602 (2011)

2011
[27]

Phys.12, 540–544 (2016)

Huang, L.et al.Experimental realization of two- dimensional synthetic spin-orbit coupling in ultracold Fermi gases.Nat. Phys.12, 540–544 (2016)

2016
[28]

Cao, Y.et al.Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

2018
[29]

Yankowitz, M.et al.Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene.Science363, 1059–1064 (2019)

2019
[30]

Lu, X.et al.Superconductors, orbital magnets and cor- related states in magic-angle bilayer graphene.Nature 574, 653–657 (2019)

2019
[31]

Meng, Z.et al.Atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in twisted-bilayer optical lattices.Nature615, 231–236 (2023)

2023
[32]

Julku, A., Bruun, G. M. & T¨ orm¨ a, P. Quantum geometry and flat band Bose-Einstein condensate.Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 170404 (2021)

2021
[33]

& Kruchkov, A

Lukin, I., Sotnikov, A. & Kruchkov, A. Unconven- tional superfluidity and quantum geometry of topological bosons.arXiv2307.08748 (2023). SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL Details of the experimental setup A BEC of typical 5×10 5 atoms in|F= 1, m F = 1⟩state is prepared in the crossed ...

2023 arXiv
[34]

Here, mis the atomic mass andℏis the Planck constant divided by 2π

The effective Hamiltonian at Dirac point The condensate dynamics in the honeycomb optical lattice can be described by the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation iℏ∂t|χ⟩=H|χ⟩,(3) where H=− ℏ2 2m ∇2 + 2 9 V0 cos(G1 ·r) + cos(G 2 ·r) + cos(G 3 ·r) ,(4) andV 0 is the lattice depth,...
[35]

Generate vortex by gauge potential with the help of the harmonic trap Our experimental scheme can be considered as a momentum-space counterpart of topological manipulation of BECs using spatially varying magnetic fields [9–11]. For a condensate with internal spin degrees of fr...
[36]

In this case, we find that the opening direction of the density of the vortex states is also towards the Brillouin zone centre, but the circulating direction of the vortex phase is opposite, as shown in Fig. S7d
[37]

The spinor order parameter in the dressed-state representation of Eq

Generate vortex by coherent spin flip In this section, by numerical simulation we show the conventional method to create vortices near the Dirac point based on dynamical process of coherent spin flip. The spinor order parameter in the dressed-state representation of Eq. (10) i...
[38]

Interference pattern and visibility of a Mott insulator.Phys

Gerbier, F.et al. Interference pattern and visibility of a Mott insulator.Phys. Rev. A,72, 053606 (2005)

2005
[39]

Brown, C. D.et al. Direct geometric probe of singularities in band structure.Science,377, 1319 (2022)

2022
[40]

L., Juzeli¯ unas, G., & Spielman, I

Campbell, D. L., Juzeli¯ unas, G., & Spielman, I. B. Realistic Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. A,84, 025602 (2011)

2011
[41]

Experimental realization of two-dimensional synthetic spin-orbit coupling in ultracold Fermi gases.Nat

Huang, L.et al. Experimental realization of two-dimensional synthetic spin-orbit coupling in ultracold Fermi gases.Nat. Phys.,12, 540 (2016)

2016
[42]

B., Weber, H

Arfken, G. B., Weber, H. J., & Harris, F. E.Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide, 7th ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2012)

2012
[43]

Barnett, R., Boyd, G. R. & Galitski, V. SU(3) spin-orbit coupling in systems of ultracold atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.,109, 235308 (2012)

2012
[44]

E., Shin, Y., Kielpinski, D., Pritchard, D

Leanhardt, A. E., Shin, Y., Kielpinski, D., Pritchard, D. E. & Ketterle, W. Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose- Einstein condensate.Phys. Rev. Lett.,90, 140403 (2003)

2003
[45]

Neto, A. H. C., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys.,81, 109 (2009)

2009
[46]

W., Kwon, W

Choi, J., Kang, S., Seo, S. W., Kwon, W. J., & Shin, Y. Observation of a geometric Hall effect in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate with a Skyrmion spin texture.Phys. Rev. Lett.,111, 245301 (2013)

2013
[47]

W., Ruokokoski, E., Kandel, S., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., & Hall, D

Ray, M. W., Ruokokoski, E., Kandel, S., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., & Hall, D. S. Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field.Nature,505, 657 (2014)

2014
[48]

W., Ruokokoski, E., Tiurev, K., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., & Hall, D

Ray, M. W., Ruokokoski, E., Tiurev, K., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., & Hall, D. S. Observation of isolated monopoles in a quantum field.Science,348, 54 (2015)

2015
[49]

J., Mondragon-Shem, I., & Zhou, X

Wu, C. J., Mondragon-Shem, I., & Zhou, X. F. Unconventional Bose-Einstein condensations from spin-orbit coupling. Chin. Phys. Lett.,28, 097102 (2011)

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

This condition corresponds to the two-photon Bragg transition frequencyω B between lattice beams 2 and 1 (3)

of the lowest band we set the frequency detunings of the lattice beams as ∆ω 2 =±4E R/h(+ forK 0 and− forK ′ 0). This condition corresponds to the two-photon Bragg transition frequencyω B between lattice beams 2 and 1 (3). The quadratic energy-momentum dispersion of the massive atoms defines a unique energy difference ωB = 4E R/ℏ, which just matches the s...

work page

[2] [2]

Q., Qian, T

Lv, B. Q., Qian, T. & Ding, H. Experimental perspective on three-dimensional topological semimetals.Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021)

work page 2021

[3] [3]

Ong, N. P. & Liang, S. Experimental signatures of the chiral anomaly in Dirac-Weyl semimetals.Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 394–404 (2021)

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater.6, 183–191 (2007)

work page 2007

[5] [5]

H., Guinea, F., Peres, N

Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic prop- erties of graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109–162 (2009)

work page 2009

[6] [6]

& Westervelt, R

Schliemann, J., Loss, D. & Westervelt, R. M. Zitterbewe- gung of electronic wave packets in III-V zinc-blende semi- conductor quantum wells.Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 206801 (2005)

work page 2005

[7] [7]

Observing Zitterbewegung for photons near the Dirac point of a two-dimensional photonic crystal

Zhang, X. Observing Zitterbewegung for photons near the Dirac point of a two-dimensional photonic crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 113903 (2008)

work page 2008

[8] [8]

I., Novoselov, K

Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene.Nat. Phys. 2, 620–625 (2013)

work page 2013