Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

Stacking-dependent electronic structure of ultrathin perovskite bilayers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A stacking-dependent tight-binding model captures the valence bands of perovskite bilayers and supplies the foundation for twisted oxide layers.

desk verdict Solid four-stacking tight-binding models for RP1 perovskites, but the claimed pathway to twisted-layer models is missing the arbitrary-shift parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16497 v2 pith:5WH5F2KI submitted 2024-11-25 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Daniel T. Larson , Daniel Bennett , Abduhla Ali , Anderson S. Chaves , Raagya Arora , Karin M. Rabe , Efthimios Kaxiras This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords twistronicsperovskiteoxidesRuddlesden-Popperphasestight-bindingmodelmaximallylocalizedWannierfunctionsmoirépatternsstacking-dependentelectronicstructureinterlayercoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Twistronics has mostly been a van der Waals story: weakly bound layers twisted against each other to make moiré patterns. This paper tries to move that program into oxide perovskites, where interlayer bonding is much stronger. It claims that the valence-band physics of a Ruddlesden-Popper RP1 layer, and of bilayer stacks in the four high-symmetry configurations AA, AB, DWx, and DWy, can be captured by a five-band maximally localized Wannier tight-binding model, and at even lower cost by a three-band effective model whose interlayer couplings depend on the relative in-plane shift between the layers. For Sr2TiO4 the model bands are reported to be nearly indistinguishable from the density-functional results, and the same construction is parametrized for Ca2TiO4 and Ba2TiO4. The payoff, if the claim holds, is a ready-made ingredient for modeling twisted perovskite bilayers, where the local stacking at each point of the moiré cell controls the electronic structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mirror-odd sector of the oxygen-p/titanium-d valence manifold. Symmetry under reflection through the mid-plane of the BO6 octahedron separates the 17 atomic orbitals into states that couple between layers and states that do not; keeping only the five mirror-odd combinations reduces the valence manifold to a manageable tight-binding basis. The monolayer Hamiltonian is written with functions fk(a)=2cos(k·a) and gk(a)=2i sin(k·a), and the interlayer coupling at each stacking is a matrix whose entries are sums over neighbor atoms weighted by Gaussian decay in in-plane distance and interlayer separation. The minimal model is obtained by a Schur-complement reduction of the lower two bands, leaving a three-band-per-layer Hamiltonian with renormalized parameters. This construction is what makes twistronics tractable: the same shift-dependent coupling matrices can be evaluated at every local stacking in a twisted moiré cell.

What would settle it

Calculate the valence bands of a small-angle twisted Sr2TiO4 bilayer with full ionic relaxation and compare them band-by-band with the model's prediction built from these shift-dependent couplings; if the low-energy bands differ by more than a few tens of meV, or if relaxed AAx and AAy stackings produce materially different interlayer couplings, the configuration-space foundation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the entire interlayer physics of ultrathin perovskite bilayers lives in five mirror-odd valence states: the hybrids ψ1,z and φ1,ℓ formed from apical oxygen p orbitals and the titanium dz2 orbital, together with the in-plane oxygen pz combinations χ±1,z. A 15-parameter tight-binding Hamiltonian in this basis reproduces the DFT valence bands of the monolayer essentially exactly for STO and well for CTO and BTO. For bilayers, the paper writes the interlayer coupling as explicit matrices at the four special shifts r00 (AA), r11 (AB), r10 (DWx), and r01 (DWy), with momentum dependence in cosine and sine combinations of the shift, and shows that the resulting bands match the DFT bilayer bands. The full 10-band model can be reduced to three bands per layer by integrating out the lower two mirror-odd states, producing a minimal model that retains the stacking-dependent valence-band maximum away from Γ. The authors state that this shift-dependent parametrization provides the necessary ingredients for full-scale tight-binding and continuum models of twisted perovskite bilayers.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation depends on the premise that every local environment in a twisted bilayer is faithfully represented by the untilted, unrelaxed stackings computed here, and specifically that the four AA-type stackings have nearly identical electronic effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The tabulated monolayer and interlayer parameters are directly usable to build tight-binding models of twisted RP1 oxide bilayers in arbitrary commensurate moiré cells.
  • The shift-dependent interlayer couplings provide the moiré potential for continuum models of twisted perovskite oxides, following the same route used for graphene and transition-metal dichalcogenides.
  • Because the AA stacking is more than 1 eV per unit cell higher in energy than AB and has nearly twice the interlayer separation, local regions of a moiré cell will have sharply different interlayer coupling, so stacking domains should be electronically distinct.
  • In all four stackings the interlayer interaction moves the valence-band maximum into mirror-odd states away from Γ, so hole-doped twisted perovskite bilayers should show strongly stacking-sensitive transport and optical response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ionic relaxation inside a moiré cell is strong, the paper's assumption that the four AA-type stackings behave equivalently may fail; computing interlayer couplings for relaxed bilayers at AAx and AAy would test this directly, since the paper explicitly leaves relaxation to future work.
  • The same symmetry decomposition could be applied to the conduction band, which the paper notes is dominated by Ti dxy orbitals and is not modeled here; a paired valence and conduction model would open electron-doped twisted oxides.
  • The large stacking-energy differences suggest that twisted oxide bilayers could develop reconstructed stacking domains whose electronic properties differ more sharply than in van der Waals moirés; this is an inference, not a result of the paper.
  • The reported near-independence of the AA stacking's electronic states, combined with large interlayer separation, implies that AA regions in a moiré cell act almost like decoupled monolayers; a continuum model built from these couplings would predict strong spatial modulation of band hybridization across the moiré cell.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops tight-binding models for the valence bands of monolayer and bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper (RP1) perovskite oxides, specifically Ca2TiO4, Sr2TiO4, and Ba2TiO4. A five-band maximally localized Wannier function (MLWF) model is constructed for the mirror-odd valence states, and a reduced three-band effective model is fitted to the top of the valence band. For bilayers, the authors compute generalized stacking fault energies and heights, derive interlayer coupling Hamiltonians for four high-symmetry stackings (AA, AB, DWx, DWy) in both the five-band and three-band forms, and compare the resulting band structures with DFT. They then propose a configuration-space parametrization of the interlayer hopping as a function of relative layer shift, intended as the foundation for future twisted-bilayer models. The direct four-stacking results are presented as the main technical achievement, with the configuration-space extension framed as the route to full moiré Hamiltonians.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a valuable step toward extending twistronics beyond van der Waals materials to strongly bonded oxide layers. The paper's concrete strengths are the direct DFT-based construction of MLWF tight-binding models for three materials, the explicit stacking-dependent interlayer Hamiltonians for the four high-symmetry stackings, and the GSFE/GSFH fits. The comparison between the MLWF bands and DFT bands is close (Fig. 3b for STO; Figs. S4-S7 for CTO/BTO), and the paper makes falsifiable predictions for the stacking-dependent valence band structure that can be tested by future experiments or calculations. However, the claimed pathway to twisted-bilayer models rests on an arbitrary-shift interpolation whose parameters are not fully specified, which limits the transferability of the model as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV.C, Eqs. (26)-(29) and Appendix C] The general interlayer hopping parametrization for arbitrary shifts depends on the decay constants ξ and κ and the cutoff function fc(x), but no numerical values or explicit functional form for these quantities are provided anywhere in the manuscript or supplement. Appendix C only fixes combinations: from Eq. (C2), u2 = t0 e^{-κ} and u3 = t0 e^{-κ} e^{-ξ}, so e^{-ξ} = u3/u2 is determined, but t0 and κ remain undetermined because t0 is never specified. Since the stated deliverable in Section V is "the necessary ingredients for full-scale tight-binding models of twisted layers," these missing constants make the arbitrary-shift model not actionable. The authors should provide explicit values (or a fitting procedure) for ξ, κ, and fc, and should test the exponential-plus-cutoff interpolation against DFT or MLWF calculations at intermediate shifts.
  2. [§IV.A] The assumption that the four AA-type stackings are essentially equivalent is stated but never tested. AAx, AAy, and the unit-cell-center AA stacking are never computed, even though they are identified as distinct in Fig. 4(b) and the moiré cell reduction relies on their equivalence. A single DFT or MLWF calculation for the AAx or AAy stacking would directly test this load-bearing assumption; without it, the configuration-space model may misrepresent the actual moiré potential.
  3. [§III and §IV.C, Table IV] The simplified three-band model is numerically fitted to DFT bands (Section III) and its interlayer parameters are described as "optimized by hand" (Section IV.C), rather than derived from the MLWF model or from the general interpolation. This means the three-band model has no independent predictive content beyond the fitted stackings; its agreement with DFT in Fig. 7 is a fitting result, not a validation. The manuscript should clarify the status of these parameters and ideally show that they are consistent with the general shift-dependent expressions in Eqs. (26)-(29), or with a Schur-complement reduction of the five-band model.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II, Fig. 1] The caption for Fig. 1 lists panels (d) and (e) as bulk cubic SrTiO3 and bulk RP1 Sr2TiO4 band structures, but the text in Section II does not explicitly reference these panels; adding a pointer would improve readability.
  2. [§IV.C, Eq. (24)] The convention {r = 0, Rj = 0} ⇒ xj = 0, yj = 0 is stated, but similar care is needed for the other atoms j that may also produce zero denominators (e.g., when rj = 0 for nonzero r due to symmetry); the current text only mentions the r = 0, Rj = 0 case.
  3. [§IV.C, Table III] The table lists λD = w7/w6, but w7 and w6 are positive for all materials, while λD is presumably a signed ratio that can affect the band structure; a brief note on the allowed range or physical meaning of λD would be useful.
  4. [§IV.B, Fig. 6] The line-cut labels in Fig. 6 use "AB / DX" and "AA" in the x-axis ticks, but the text defines DWx and DWy; using consistent notation (DWx/DWy) would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tight-binding models are openly fitted to DFT bands and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central products are tight-binding Hamiltonians whose parameters are obtained by fitting to DFT band structures (Tables I-IV, with Wannier fits described in Appendix A), and the subsequent band plots compare the models against the same DFT data. This is model construction and fidelity checking, not prediction: the paper never claims these bands are independent of the fitting data, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a predicted quantity. The configuration-space approach is cited from prior work that includes some of the present authors, but it is used as a methodological framework for classifying local stackings and for the form of the interlayer hopping; the stacking classifications and the interlayer matrix elements themselves are computed here from DFT and MLWFs rather than imported as an unexamined theorem. The statement in Sec. IV A that the four AA-type stackings have very similar electronic effects is an explicit physical assumption, not a derived result, so it cannot be circular. Appendix C shows that the general hopping ansatz of Eqs. (26)-(29) reduces, with identifying relations such as u2 = t0 e^{-kappa} and u3 = t0 e^{-kappa} e^{-xi}, to the MLWF-fitted special-case parameters; this consistency is not circular because those special-case values are independent inputs and no intermediate-shift prediction is actually made. In fact, xi, kappa, and fc are never specified and no intermediate-shift DFT check is reported, which limits the completeness of the claimed pathway to twisted-layer models but is an underdetermination issue, not circularity. No self-referential uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no result in the paper is equivalent by definition to its own input. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained in the sense required here: the fitted models are presented as fits, and the only forward-looking claim, the availability of ingredients for twisted-layer models, is an extrapolation that is untested rather than circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core models rest on dozens of parameters fitted to DFT bands and on several stated reduction assumptions. No new physical entities such as particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The supplied parameter sets are the main contribution, but the arbitrary-shift interlayer coupling is under-specified because ξ, κ, and fc are not given.

free parameters (7)
  • MLWF intralayer TB parameters (15 per material, Table I) = CTO/STO/BTO values in Table I
    Fit to reproduce the M-odd valence bands from DFT; this is the ab initio anchor of the paper.
  • Simplified 3-band intralayer parameters (Table II) = Values in Table II, with λxy set to -1/3
    Numerically fitted to the top three M-odd DFT bands after explicitly abandoning the Schur complement derivation.
  • MLWF interlayer parameters (Table III) = u, v, w values per material
    Fit to DFT bilayer band structures at the AA, AB, DWx, and DWy stackings.
  • Simplified interlayer parameters (Table IV) = Values in Table IV
    Optimized by hand to reproduce the top three valence bands in each bilayer stacking.
  • Gaussian decay constants ξ and κ = Not reported
    Introduced in Eqs. (26)-(29) for arbitrary-shift interlayer hoppings, but no numerical values are given; only combinations such as u2 = t0 exp(-κ) are fit at special stackings.
  • Cutoff function fc(x) = Not specified
    Defined only as equal to 1 for x < 1 and smoothly going to zero for x ≥ 1; the explicit form and hopping range are not given.
  • GSFE and GSFH Fourier coefficients (Tables V and VI) = Coefficients per material
    Fit to DFT stacking fault energies and heights; used for the structural energy landscape.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption PBE + DFT-D3 and PAW pseudopotentials give accurate band structures and energies for these titanates.
    All first-principles inputs use standard approximations (Appendix A); exchange-correlation errors could shift gaps and hybridization, especially for correlated oxides.
  • ad hoc to paper The relevant low-energy interlayer physics is captured by the five M-odd states built from O p and Ti d_z2 orbitals, while M-even valence states can be neglected.
    Justified by DFT orbital projections in Fig. 3, but it is a modeling reduction that would fail if M-even states hybridize under doping or in twisted structures.
  • ad hoc to paper The anti-bonding ψ2,z and bonding ψ0,z states can be removed from the basis because they are far from the valence band top.
    Stated in Section III based on energy separation; not rigorously tested at all stackings.
  • ad hoc to paper Interlayer hopping is dominated by σ-type bonding between O3 of the top layer and O4 of the bottom layer; π-type bonding and O4(top)-O3(bottom) hopping are negligible.
    Stated in Section IV C without a numerical estimate of the neglected matrix elements.
  • domain assumption The configuration-space approximation applies to twisted bilayers: local stacking environments are equivalent to untwisted shifted bilayers with only vertical relaxation.
    Standard for weakly coupled vdW twistronics, but less tested for strongly coupled ionic perovskites; enters in Sections IV A and IV C.
  • ad hoc to paper The four AA-type stacking regions have very similar electronic effects and can be treated as equivalent.
    Assumed in Section IV A; only the r00 AA stacking is explicitly computed with DFT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stacking-dependent electronic structure of ultrathin perovskite bilayers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5WH5F2KI

@misc{pith2026241116497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stacking-dependent electronic structure of ultrathin perovskite bilayers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5WH5F2KI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16497}
}
abstract

Twistronics has received much attention as a new method to manipulate the properties of 2D van der Waals structures by introducing moir\'e patterns through a relative rotation between two layers. Here we begin a theoretical exploration of twistronics beyond the realm of van der Waals materials by developing a first-principles description of the electronic structure and interlayer interactions of ultrathin perovskite bilayers. We construct both an ab initio tight-binding model as well as a minimal 3-band effective model for the valence bands of monolayers and bilayers of oxides derived from the Ruddlesden-Popper phase of perovskites, which is amenable to thin-layer formation. We illustrate the approach with the specific example of Sr$_2$TiO$_4$ layers but also provide model parameters for Ca$_2$TiO$_4$ and Ba$_2$TiO$_4$ .

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (c), which is stable in the structural and electronic sense. Specifically, in this single unit there are no bro￾ken bonds between the B atoms and the surrounding O atoms, and thus no dangling bonds on either surface of the layer. This is the thinnest stable structure that re￾tains the essence of the perovskite parent but can still be thought of as a 2D layer that can potentially be twisted and stacked. Thus we begin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The basic structural model, consisting of an octahe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. STO RP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of the moir´e pattern formed by two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Band structures of STO RP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature 499, 419 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    integrate out

    0 0 t2j(2) k (a2, a1,ν 2,ν′ 2) t1j(1) k (a1, a2,ν 1) t1j(1) k (a2, a1,ν 1)  . (13) The momentum dependence in Hk is described by the functions fk and gk[52]: fk(a) =eik·a +e−ik·a = 2 cos(k· a) (14) gk(a) =eik·a−e−ik·a = 2i sin(k· a), (15) as well as the combinations: hk(a, a′,λ,µ ) =fk(a) +λfk(a′) +µfk(a)fk(a′) (16) j(1) k (a, a′,ν ) = [1 +νfk(a′)]fk (...

    work page

  3. [3]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moir´ e materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 3 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al. , Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern in- sulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature 622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al. , Observa- tion of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Na- ture 622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    K. P. Nuckolls, M. Oh, D. Wong, B. Lian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Strongly correlated chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 588, 610 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    S. Wu, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, Chern insulators, van Hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. 20, 488 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, et al. , Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Signatures of tunable superconduc- tivity in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled supercon- ductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Na- ture 590, 249 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    J. M. Park, Y. Cao, L.-Q. Xia, S. Sun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Robust supercon- ductivity in magic-angle multilayer graphene family, Nat. Mater. 21, 877 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al. , Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    K. P. Nuckolls, R. L. Lee, M. Oh, D. Wong, T. Soe- jima, J. P. Hong, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, B. A. Bernevig, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, N. Regnault, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Quantum textures of the many-body wavefunctions in magic-angle graphene, Na- ture 6...

    2023

  8. [16]

    Yasuda, X

    K. Yasuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Stacking-engineered ferroelectricity in bilayer boron nitride, Science 372, 1458 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Bennett and B

    D. Bennett and B. Remez, On electrically tunable stack- ing domains and ferroelectricity in moir´ e superlattices, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 6, 1 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Bennett, Theory of polar domains in moir´ e het- erostructures, Phys

    D. Bennett, Theory of polar domains in moir´ e het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235445 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    K. Ko, A. Yuk, R. Engelke, S. Carr, J. Kim, D. Park, H. Heo, H.-M. Kim, S.-G. Kim, H. Kim, et al., Operando electron microscopy investigation of polar domain dy- namics in twisted van der Waals homobilayers, Nat. Mater. , 1 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Bennett, G

    D. Bennett, G. Chaudhary, R.-J. Slager, E. Bous- quet, and P. Ghosez, Polar meron-antimeron networks in strained and twisted bilayers, Nat. Commun. 14, 1629 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Van Winkle, N

    M. Van Winkle, N. Dowlatshahi, N. Khaloo, M. Iyer, I. M. Craig, R. Dhall, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and D. K. Bediako, Engineering interfacial polarization switching in van der Waals multilayers, Nat. Nanotech- 14 nol. , 1 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Yasuda, E

    K. Yasuda, E. Zalys-Geller, X. Wang, D. Bennett, S. S. Cheema, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. Ashoori, Ultrafast high- endurance memory based on sliding ferroelectrics, Sci- ence , eadp3575 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Q. Tong, F. Liu, J. Xiao, and W. Yao, Skyrmions in the moir´ e of van der Waals 2D magnets, Nano Lett.18, 7194 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Hejazi, Z.-X

    K. Hejazi, Z.-X. Luo, and L. Balents, Noncollinear phases in moir´ e magnets, PNAS117, 10721 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Song, Q.-C

    T. Song, Q.-C. Sun, E. Anderson, C. Wang, J. Qian, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, R. St¨ ohr, D. Xiao, et al. , Direct visualization of magnetic domains and moir´ e magnetism in twisted 2D magnets, Science 374, 1140 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Bennett, G

    D. Bennett, G. Mart´ ınez-Carracedo, X. He, J. Fer- rer, P. Ghosez, R. Comin, and E. Kaxiras, Stacking- engineered ferroelectricty and multiferroic order in van der Waals magnets, arXiv:2405.20069 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. Fang, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Twistronics: manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075420 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    H. Yoo, R. Engelke, S. Carr, S. Fang, K. Zhang, P. Cazeaux, S. H. Sung, R. Hovden, A. W. Tsen, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Atomic and electronic reconstruc- tion at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. 18, 448 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems, Science 309, 257 (2005)

    E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems, Science 309, 257 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    D. Ji, S. Cai, T. R. Paudel, H. Sun, C. Zhang, L. Han, Y. Wei, Y. Zang, M. Gu, Y. Zhang, et al. , Freestanding crystalline oxide perovskites down to the monolayer limit, Nature 570, 87 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    M. Beno, L. Soderholm, D. Capone, D. Hinks, J. Jor- gensen, J. Grace, I. K. Schuller, C. Segre, and K. Zhang, Structure of the single-phase high-temperature supercon- ductor YBa2Cu3O7−δ, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 57 (1987)

    1987

  24. [32]

    Schneemeyer, J

    L. Schneemeyer, J. V. Waszczak, T. Siegrist, R. B. van Dover, L. Rupp, B. Batlogg, R. J. Cava, and D. W. Murphy, Superconductivity in YBa 2Cu3O7 single crys- tals, Nature 328, 601 (1987)

    1987

  25. [33]

    Massidda, J

    S. Massidda, J. Yu, and A. Freeman, Electronic struc- ture and properties of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8, the third high-Tc superconductor, Physica C: Supercond. 152, 251 (1988)

    1988

  26. [34]

    Krishana, N

    K. Krishana, N. Ong, Q. Li, G. Gu, and N. Koshizuka, Plateaus observed in the field profile of thermal con- ductivity in the superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8, Science 277, 83 (1997)

    1997

  27. [35]

    Logvenov, A

    G. Logvenov, A. Gozar, and I. Bozovic, High- temperature superconductivity in a single copper-oxygen plane, Science 326, 699 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Ruddlesden and P

    S. Ruddlesden and P. Popper, The compound Sr 3Ti2O7 and its structure, Acta Crystallogr. 11, 54 (1958)

    1958

  29. [37]

    R. E. Schaak and T. E. Mallouk, Prying apart Ruddlesden-Popper phases: exfoliation into sheets and nanotubes for assembly of perovskite thin films, Chem. Mater. 12, 3427 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    C. C. Stoumpos, D. H. Cao, D. J. Clark, J. Young, J. M. Rondinelli, J. I. Jang, J. T. Hupp, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Ruddlesden-Popper hybrid lead iodide perovskite 2D ho- mologous semiconductors, Chem. Mater.28, 2852 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    D. Lu, D. J. Baek, S. S. Hong, L. F. Kourkoutis, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Synthesis of freestanding single-crystal perovskite films and heterostructures by etching of sacrificial water-soluble layers, Nat. Mater.15, 1255 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    S. S. Hong, M. Gu, M. Verma, V. Harbola, B. Y. Wang, D. Lu, A. Vailionis, Y. Hikita, R. Pentcheva, J. M. Rondinelli, et al. , Extreme tensile strain states in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 membranes, Science 368, 71 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    D. Pan, Y. Fu, N. Spitha, Y. Zhao, C. R. Roy, D. J. Mor- row, D. D. Kohler, J. C. Wright, and S. Jin, Deterministic fabrication of arbitrary vertical heterostructures of two- dimensional Ruddlesden–Popper halide perovskites, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 159 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    J. Shen, Z. Dong, M. Qi, Y. Zhang, C. Zhu, Z. Wu, and D. Li, Observation of moir´ e patterns in twisted stacks of bilayer perovskite oxide nanomembranes with various lat- tice symmetries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 50386 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    S´ anchez-Santolino, V

    G. S´ anchez-Santolino, V. Rouco, S. Puebla, H. Aram- berri, V. Zamora, M. Cabero, F. Cuellar, C. Munuera, F. Mompean, M. Garcia-Hernandez, et al. , A 2D ferro- electric vortex pattern in twisted BaTiO 3 freestanding layers, Nature 626, 529 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Y. Wang, Y. Lan, Q. Song, F. Vogelbacher, T. Xu, Y. Zhan, M. Li, W. E. Sha, and Y. Song, Colorful efficient moir´ e-perovskite solar cells, Adv. Mater. 33, 2008091 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Zhang, L

    S. Zhang, L. Jin, Y. Lu, L. Zhang, J. Yang, Q. Zhao, D. Sun, J. J. Thompson, B. Yuan, K. Ma, et al. , Square moir´ e superlattices in twisted two-dimensional halide perovskites, arXiv:2312.16679 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    S. Lee, D. J. P. de Sousa, B. Jalan, and T. Low, Moir´ e polar vortex, flat bands and Lieb lattice in twisted bilayer BaTiO3, Sci. Adv. 10, eadq0293 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and E. Kaxi- ras, Derivation of Wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding Hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: first-principles approach, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033072 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact con- tinuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 013001 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Bennett, D

    D. Bennett, D. T. Larson, L. Sharma, S. Carr, and E. Kaxiras, Twisted bilayer graphene revisited: Minimal two-band model for low-energy bands, Phys. Rev. B109, 155422 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Fang and E

    S. Fang and E. Kaxiras, Electronic structure theory of weakly interacting bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235153 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    S. Fang, S. Carr, Z. Zhu, D. Massatt, and E. Kaxi- ras, Angle-dependent ab initio low-energy hamiltonians for a relaxed twisted bilayer graphene heterostructure, arXiv:1908.00058 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    The arguments to these functions, such as a1, a2, µ, ν, etc., are understood as discrete parameters, with k the only independent variable

  46. [54]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moire bands in twisted double-layer graphene, PNAS 108, 12233 (2011). 15

    2011

  47. [55]

    Massatt, M

    D. Massatt, M. Luskin, and C. Ortner, Electronic density of states for incommensurate layers, Multiscale Model. Simul. 15, 476 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Cazeaux, M

    P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and D. Massatt, Energy minimization of two dimensional incommensurate het- ererostructures, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 235, 1289 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    For half of the commensurate angles a smaller supercell can be formed which is rotated by 45◦ and contains only two distinct AA regions

  50. [58]

    Kaxiras and M

    E. Kaxiras and M. S. Duesbery, Free energies of general- ized stacking faults in si and implications for the brittle- ductile transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3752 (1993)

    1993

  51. [59]

    S. Fang, R. Kuate Defo, S. N. Shirodkar, S. Lieu, G. A. Tritsaris, and E. Kaxiras, Ab initio tight-binding hamil- tonian for transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205108 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Angeli and A

    M. Angeli and A. H. MacDonald, Γ valley transi- tion metal dichalcogenide moir´ e bands, PNAS 118, e2021826118 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Angeli, G

    M. Angeli, G. R. Schleder, and E. Kaxiras, Twistronics of janus transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 106, 235159 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  56. [64]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  57. [65]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 ele- ments H-Pu, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010). Supplementary Material: Stacking-dependent electronic struct...

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.