Gluons in the $\eta'$ and in nucleon resonances

Steven D. Bass

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Gluons in the $\eta'$ and in nucleon resonances

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that non-perturbative gluon topology—the same glue that makes the eta' meson heavy—also acts inside the nucleon and may show up as a narrow near-threshold resonance and as parity doublets in the excited nucleon spectrum.

desk verdict A candid, well-written proceedings note that reviews the gluonic role in eta-prime physics accurately and then floats two speculative ideas; the narrow-resonance anchor is soft because the two coupled-channels fits disagree on J^P. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16597 v2 pith:XNYRULRB submitted 2024-11-25 hep-ph nucl-th

Steven D. Bass This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phnucl-th

keywords gluontopologyeta-primemassnucleonresonancesparitydoubletssupercriticalconfinementOZIviolationphotoproductionWitten-Venezianoformula

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the same non-perturbative gluonic degrees of freedom that give the eta' meson its unusually large mass are not confined to meson physics: they should be active inside the nucleon, in the pion cloud, and possibly in the spectrum of excited nucleon states. It assembles evidence from the Witten–Veneziano mass formula, the measured about −40 MeV shift of the eta' mass in nuclear matter, and two coupled-channels analyses of eta' photoproduction that disagree on quantum numbers but both suggest a very narrow resonance just above the eta'–proton threshold. The paper proposes that such a resonance, if real, would be an excitation of the gluonic potential in the pion cloud, and that parity doublets seen roughly 700 MeV above the proton and $\Delta$(1232) masses might signal a second minimum in the confinement potential, corresponding to Gribov's supercritical confinement. A sympathetic reader would care because both proposals are testable and would change how the quark–gluon structure of baryons is understood.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gluonic mass term $\tilde m^2_{\eta_0}$, the singlet contribution to the eta' mass from the Yang–Mills topological susceptibility, which enters through the Witten–Veneziano formula $m^2_\eta + m^2_{\eta'} = 2m^2_K + \tilde m^2_{\eta_0}$; it represents non-perturbative gluon topology (the winding number of the gluon field) and is the reason the eta' is not a Goldstone boson. The paper treats this same 'UA(1) gluon potential' as a physical field active in the pion cloud, where it forbids isoscalar pions and generates the eta'–nucleon scattering length and in-medium mass shift. For the resonance spectrum, the second central object is a conjectured second minimum in the confinement potential, associated with Gribov's supercritical confinement: a vector-like confining solution in which the quark propagator has cuts that prevent Wick rotation, so states built on that minimum would be visible in Minkowski-space experiments but absent from Euclidean lattice calculations. These two mechanisms—gluonic excitation in the pion cloud and a supercritical second minimum—carry the paper's two main phenomenological proposals.

What would settle it

High-statistics gamma p to eta' p data with energy binning near 1 MeV across W = 1896–1905 MeV, plus polarisation observables, would settle the resonance: if the narrow 2 MeV structure is absent or its line shape disagrees with an S11 or D13 Breit-Wigner, the gluon-excitation interpretation fails. For the second-minimum claim, a lattice QCD calculation at physical quark masses that reproduces the high-mass parity doublets would falsify the assertion that Euclidean methods cannot see those states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the gluon topology responsible for the eta' mass—encoded in the gluonic mass term $\tilde m^2_{\eta_0}$ and the Witten–Veneziano formula—is a physical agent that also acts in the nucleon's pion cloud and may be excited in resonance production. The gluonic potential must suppress isoscalar pion degrees of freedom, and the absence of isoscalar pions is taken as evidence that this potential is an essential part of the nucleon. The paper then connects two possible observable manifestations: a narrow near-threshold eta'–proton resonance (mass about 1900 MeV, width about 2 MeV) that could be the excitation of this potential in the pion cloud, and the parity doublets in the higher-mass N* and $\Delta$* spectra, which quark models and Euclidean lattice QCD do not reproduce. For the latter, the paper speculates that there may be a second minimum in the confinement potential about 700 MeV above the proton ground state, where confinement becomes vector-like and the quark propagator's analytic structure prevents analytic continuation between Minkowski and Euclidean space—so lattice calculations would miss these states. This is presented as an interpretation of Gribov's supercritical confinement picture, not as a derived result.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the near-threshold eta'p structure and the high-mass parity doublets are real: the resonance claim rests on statistics-limited photoproduction fits whose two analyses assign different quantum numbers, and the doublet pattern must survive scrutiny as genuine pairs rather than accidental near-degeneracies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the narrow near-threshold eta'p resonance is real, it would be a new hadron state with width about 2 MeV, much narrower than typical nucleon resonances, decaying almost exclusively to eta'p and a small fraction to eta p.
Its mass at $W \approx 1901$ MeV puts the final-state 3-momentum at about 69 MeV, corresponding to the pion Compton wavelength, so it would probe the pion-cloud region of the nucleon.
The eta' mass shift of about −40 MeV at nuclear matter density, if gluon-mediated as argued, implies eta' bound states in nuclei and a non-zero real part of the eta'–nucleon scattering length even in the chiral limit.
If parity doublets above roughly 700 MeV correspond to a supercritical confinement minimum, then standard quark-model and Euclidean lattice descriptions of baryon spectroscopy are incomplete at higher masses.
The gluonic intermediate states implied by OZI violation would suppress the production of this resonance, so it should be searched for in high-statistics photoproduction with fine energy binning and polarisation observables.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A decisive test the paper leaves implicit: if the near-threshold resonance is an excitation of the UA(1) gluon potential, its production amplitude should be suppressed relative to ordinary resonances by OZI and 1/N_c factors, so a comparison of its photoproduction strength with that of the N*(1895) would discriminate the gluonic mechanism from a conventional quark-model state.
If the second confinement minimum is real, the same analytic-structure argument would predict that other observables requiring Wick rotation, such as finite-temperature lattice thermodynamics, might also miss supercritical states, suggesting that experimental spectroscopy at facilities like JLab and GSI—not lattice data—is the ultimate arbiter for the high-mass spectrum.
The parity-doublet pattern in the paper's table could be tested for degeneracy of decay widths and couplings, not just masses; supercritical states would be expected to show very different coupling patterns to meson–baryon channels than ordinary resonances.
A chiral Lagrangian with the Q field explicitly included, extended to the baryon sector, could provide a concrete model for the narrow eta'p state and predict its expected helicity amplitudes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

You can read this one in an hour. It is Bass's proceedings write-up from the Krakow 1 GeV workshop. The review parts are solid: Witten-Veneziano, the lattice value of the topological susceptibility, the -40 MeV in-medium mass shift, and the eta'-proton scattering length all get accurate treatment with honest error bars. The paper also makes a nice point that the absence of an isoscalar pion forces the UA(1)-gluonic potential to be active in the pion cloud, which is a sensible observation.

The two speculative suggestions are clearly labeled as such. First, that the narrow near-threshold eta'p structure seen in two coupled-channels analyses might be an excitation of that gluonic potential. Second, that parity doublets in higher-mass nucleon resonances might hint at a second minimum in the confinement potential with supercritical confinement. Both are interesting, and the paper is careful to say they are hints, not claims.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note lands. The narrow resonance evidence is statistics-limited, and the two fits do not agree on the quantum numbers: Bonn says D13, Mainz prefers S11. That is not a small discrepancy; it means the existence, width, and J^P of the state are all uncertain. Bass acknowledges this and asks for better data, but then he still leans on the state for the pion-cloud excitation story. There is no quantitative calculation showing that an auxiliary Q field with no kinetic term produces a 2 MeV resonance at threshold; the identification is qualitative. The parity-doublet discussion is even more speculative: the second minimum is invoked via Gribov's scenario, but there is no model showing how the analytic structure prevents lattice observation. Still, that section is explicitly framed as a hint, and it does not depend on the resonance, so the two soft spots are somewhat independent.

For a proceedings contribution, this is exactly the right register: honest, clear, and appropriately speculative. It would not pass as a standalone research paper claiming a new result, because no new derivation is offered. But as a discussion paper, it is useful for the review content and for posing sharp questions to the spectroscopy community.

Who is this for? Hadron spectroscopists, especially those working on eta' photoproduction and baryon resonances. It would be a fine reading-group starting point for a discussion of where gluonic degrees of freedom show up beyond the eta' mass. I would not cite it in my own work as a source of new results, but I might cite it for the review of the in-medium shift or the scattering length.

If this were submitted to a regular journal, I would send it to a referee. The speculative sections deserve careful scrutiny, and a referee can push for sharper separation of what is established from what is hoped for. The paper is already honest about the distinction, but a referee could ask for one clarifying computation or at least a more explicit caveat about the D13/S11 discrepancy before it goes further.

In short: a solid, honest proceedings paper with two well-spotted speculative hooks, one of which rests on a shaky empirical base. Worth engaging with, but not something to build on without new data.

Best,

[Your name]

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This proceedings-style paper reviews the established role of non-perturbative gluon topology in the mass and interactions of the eta' meson, covering the Witten-Veneziano formula, the lattice Yang-Mills topological susceptibility, the in-medium eta' mass shift of about -40 MeV, and the eta'-proton scattering length. It then advances two speculative ideas: first, that a possible narrow near-threshold eta'p resonance in photoproduction might be an excitation of the U_A(1) gluon potential in the pion cloud; and second, that the appearance of parity doublets in higher-mass N* and Delta* resonances, beginning roughly 700 MeV above the ground states, might hint at a second minimum in the confinement potential, possibly realized through Gribov supercritical confinement with quark propagators that do not permit a straightforward Euclidean-Minkowski continuation.

Significance. The review portions of the paper are reliable and useful: the presentations of the Witten-Veneziano relation, the lattice value of the topological susceptibility, the in-medium mass shift, and the eta'-proton scattering length are accurate and appropriately referenced. There is no circularity problem; the paper reviews established results and cites prior work, including genuine predictions that were subsequently tested. If the speculative proposals were quantitatively established, they would be significant because they would connect baryon spectroscopy to non-perturbative gluonic degrees of freedom beyond the eta' mass and would challenge the standard Euclidean-space framework for a class of states. However, the central new claims are not supported by computations: there is no quantitative mechanism connecting the auxiliary Q and G fields to a narrow threshold resonance, and the second-minimum scenario is introduced with the 700 MeV scale chosen to match the observed parity-doublet onset. As it stands, the paper is best read as an outlook or research programme rather than a demonstration.

major comments (3)

[Section 4.1, text after Eq. (8)] The empirical anchor for the proposed gluon-excitation resonance is not established. The paper itself notes that the underlying data are statistics limited and that the two coupled-channels fits assign different quantum numbers: the Bonn analysis gives D13(1900) with width below 3 MeV, while the Mainz analysis prefers S11(1900) with width 2.1 +/- 0.5 MeV. Since these are incompatible assignments for a single pole, the existence, width, and J^P of the state are unresolved, and the momentum and distance estimates in Eq. (8) are conditional on a resonance whose mass and quantum numbers are in doubt. This weakens the only quantitative connection between the U_A(1) gluon potential and baryon spectroscopy in this section. The text should either be reframed as a strictly conditional suggestion or supplemented by an analysis that can distinguish the D13 and S11 hypotheses.
[Section 4.1] No quantitative model is given for how the auxiliary Q and G fields, which have no kinetic terms and no physical states, could generate a narrow nucleon resonance with a width of about 2 MeV near the eta'p threshold. The arguments invoked, namely the pion-Compton-wavelength distance scale and OZI suppression, are dimensional and qualitative rather than a calculation. Without an effective Lagrangian or a hadronic model that produces a pole in the eta'p amplitude, the identification of the threshold structure with an excitation of the U_A(1) gluon potential remains an assertion. At minimum, the paper should provide an order-of-magnitude estimate of the width and a statement of which J^P assignment follows from the purported gluonic mechanism.
[Section 4.2 and Table 1] The proposed second minimum in the confinement potential is introduced with the condition that it lie about 700 MeV above the minimum corresponding to the proton bound state, so the parity-doublet pattern is an input chosen to match data rather than a prediction. The text does not demonstrate that Gribov supercritical confinement produces parity-degenerate multiplets, nor that the second minimum necessarily implies a failure of analytic continuation between Euclidean and Minkowski space. Since parity doublets already have alternative explanations in the literature (see Refs. [32-34]), the paper should state a concrete observable or calculation that would discriminate the supercritical-confinement scenario from those alternatives; otherwise the abstract's claim that the spectrum 'might be hinting' at a second minimum is not quantitatively supported.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2, Eq. (5)] The symbol Q is used both for the topological charge density in Eq. (4) and for the (possibly fractional) winding number in Eq. (5). This is confusing and should be disambiguated by using, for example, n for the winding number.
[Section 2] The abbreviation DChSB appears in the section title before it is defined in the body. Please define it at first use.
[Section 4.1] The sentence comparing the eta' lifetime with the candidate resonance lifetime is awkward; it would be clearer to state that the eta' total width is 0.2 MeV, roughly a factor of ten smaller than the 2 MeV width claimed for the candidate state.
[Table 1] The Delta 7/2-(2200) entry is marked with a question mark, but the text does not comment on this uncertainty. Since this entry is part of the claimed parity-doublet pattern, the tentative nature of this state should be acknowledged in the body.
[Section 4.1] The statement that Q and G 'do not correspond to a physical glueball and exist only in intermediate states' should be reconciled with the phrase 'excitation of the gluonic potential,' so that readers do not mistake the proposed resonance for a glueball.
[References] Some references are cited by preprint numbers (e.g., [1]), while others use journal citations; for a published proceedings, it would be helpful to provide consistent journal or arXiv identifiers for all entries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper's suggestions are qualitative interpretations of external data and published predictions, not inputs renamed as outputs.

full rationale

The paper does not derive a quantity from a fitted parameter and then call it a prediction. Its central suggestions, that a possible narrow near-threshold eta'p resonance might signal excitation of the UA(1) gluon potential and that parity doublets might hint at a second confinement-potential minimum, are explicitly framed as speculative ('Perhaps it might be associated...'; 'might be hinting at'), not as forced conclusions. The quantitative anchors come from external sources: the Witten-Veneziano formula and the lattice value chi^{1/4}(0)|_{YM}=185.3±5.6 MeV are attributed to Witten, Veneziano, and the ETM collaboration, not to the author. The -40 MeV eta' mass shift is a CBELSA/TAPS measurement compared with a published quark-meson-coupling calculation by Bass and Thomas; that self-citation reports a genuine prior prediction matched by independent data, and it is not the load-bearing conclusion of this paper. The parity-doublet discussion invokes Gribov's supercritical confinement scenario and a Bass-Schutte quasiparticle picture only as a qualitative candidate explanation, with no uniqueness theorem imported to exclude alternatives. The manuscript also flags the weakness of the resonance evidence itself ('These data are statistics limited'), confirming that it is not laundering a fit as a prediction. No equation in the paper reduces to an input by construction, and no load-bearing claim is justified solely by a self-citation chain. The paper is therefore self-contained as a review-plus-speculation contribution, and no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper's central discussion rests on established QCD results (Witten-Veneziano, large-Nc, chiral perturbation theory) and on two speculative postulates: a second minimum in the confinement potential about 700 MeV above the proton, and the validity of Gribov's supercritical confinement with its no-Wick-rotation property. It also relies on a phenomenologically fitted gluonic mass term for the eta'. No new physical entities are introduced by this paper; G is a known effective construct from earlier literature.

free parameters (2)

singlet gluonic mass term m~^2_eta0 = 0.73 GeV^2
Phenomenological input fitted to eta and eta' masses via the Witten-Veneziano formula, Eq. (2). Used in the paper's discussion of the gluonic mass term but not derived here.
eta-eta' mixing angle = -20 degrees
Phenomenological mixing angle used to connect the eta' light-quark component to the sigma mean field in the Quark Meson Coupling model estimate. Cited from prior work (Refs. [18,19]).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Witten-Veneziano mass formula (Eq. 2) with the gluonic mass term as the leading 1/Nc correction
Assumed as the established framework for the eta' mass; the paper takes this from Refs. [1-4] without re-deriving it.
domain assumption The gluonic mass term m~^2_eta0 has no kinetic term and corresponds to no physical glueball
Used to justify that the gluonic Q field appears only in intermediate states (Section 2).
ad hoc to paper The second minimum in the confinement potential lies about 700 MeV above the proton bound state
Postulated in Section 4.2 to avoid clash with successful phenomenology; no independent evidence provided.
domain assumption Gribov's supercritical confinement and the no-Wick-rotation property of the quark propagator
Invoked in Section 4.2 to explain why lattice QCD misses the parity doublets; sourced from Refs. [36,37] and not independently verified in this paper.

invented entities (2)

Colour-singlet gluonic exchange object G
purpose: Intermediate-state object carrying renormalisation-scale dependent couplings, contributing to singlet Goldberger-Treiman relation and eta' interactions
No physical state; appears only in virtual exchanges; based on Refs. [1,2,10]. Not newly introduced here.
Second minimum in the confinement potential / supercritical confinement vacuum
purpose: Postulated extra vacuum state about 700 MeV above the proton minimum to explain parity doublets and their absence in lattice QCD
No direct independent evidence yet; it is a speculative scenario from Gribov (Refs. [36,37]).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gluons in the $\eta'$ and in nucleon resonances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XNYRULRB

@misc{pith2026241116597,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gluons in the $\eta'$ and in nucleon resonances},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XNYRULRB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16597}
}

abstract

We discuss the role of gluon dynamics in $\eta'$ physics and in nucleon resonances where excitations of gluonic potentials may also be important. Interesting phenomenology includes a possible narrow near threshold resonance in $\eta'$ photoproduction and whether the parity doublets observed in the higher mass nucleon resonance spectrum might be hinting at a possible second minimum in the confinement potential corresponding to supercritical confinement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

G. M. Shore, hep-ph/9812354

work page Pith review arXiv
[2]

G. M. Shore, Lect. Notes Phys. 737, 235 (2008)

work page 2008
[3]

Witten, Nucl

E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 156, 269 (1979)

1979
[4]

Veneziano, Nucl

G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 159, 213 (1979)

1979
[5]

Cichy et al

K. Cichy et al. [ETM], JHEP 09, 020 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Di Vecchia and G

P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 171, 253 (1980)

1980
[7]

Witten, Annals Phys

E. Witten, Annals Phys. 128, 363 (1980)

1980
[8]

Leutwyler, Nucl

H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 64, 223 (1998)

work page 1998

Show all 38 references

[9]

S. D. Bass, Phys. Lett. B 463, 286 (1999)

1999
[10]

G. M. Shore and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 381, 23 (1992)

1992
[11]

S. D. Bass, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2441008 (2024)

2024
[12]

S. D. Bass, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1257 (2005)

2005
[13]

C. A. Aidala, S. D. Bass, D. Hasch and G. K. Mallot, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 655 (2013)

2013
[14]

S. D. Bass and P. Moskal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015003 (2019)

2019
[15]

Nanova et al

M. Nanova et al. [CBELSA/TAPS], Phys. Lett. B 727, 417 (2013) 10 Glue-in-etaprime printed on April 15, 2025

2013
[16]

Metag, M

V. Metag, M. Nanova and E. Y. Paryev, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 199 (2017)

2017
[17]

S. D. Bass, V. Metag and P. Moskal, in I. Tanihata, H. Toki, T. Ka jino (eds) Handbook of Nuclear Physics (Springer, Singapore, 2022), arXiv:2111.01388 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[18]

S. D. Bass and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. B 634, 368 (2006)

2006
[19]

S. D. Bass and A. W. Thomas, Acta Phys. Polon. B 45, 627 (2014)

2014
[20]

Czerwinski et al

E. Czerwinski et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 062004 (2014)

2014
[21]

F. E. Close, An Introduction to Quarks and Partons (Academic N.Y., 1979)

1979
[22]

Burkert, E

V. Burkert, E. Klempt and U. Thoma, [arXiv:2211.12906 [hep-ph]]

arXiv
[23]

A. V. Anisovich et al. , Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 153 (2011)

2011
[24]

D. B. Leinweber et al. , Nuovo Cim. C 47, 146 (2024)

2024
[25]

A. V. Anisovich et al. , Phys. Lett. B 785, 626 (2018)

2018
[26]

Tiator et al

L. Tiator et al. , Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 210 (2018)

2018
[27]

’t Hooft, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974)

1974
[28]

Witten, Nucl

E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 57 (1979)

1979
[29]

Thiel, F

A. Thiel, F. Afzal and Y. Wunderlich, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103949 (2022)

2022
[30]

Levi Sandri et al

P. Levi Sandri et al. [GRAAL], Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 77 (2015)

2015
[31]

V. L. Kashevarov et al. [A2], Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 212001 (2017)

2017
[32]

R. L. Jaﬀe, D. Pirjol and A. Scardicchio, Phys. Rept. 435, 157 (2006)

2006
[33]

L. Y. Glozman, Phys. Lett. B 475, 329 (2000)

2000
[34]

S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch and J. Erlich, Phys. Rept. 584, 1 (2015)

2015
[35]

S. D. Bass, A. De Roeck and M. Kado, Nature Rev. Phys. 3, 608 (2021)

2021
[36]

V. N. Gribov, Phys. Scripta T 15, 164 (1987)

1987
[37]

V. N. Gribov, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 91 (1999)

1999
[38]

S. D. Bass and D. Sch¨ utte, Z. Phys. A 357, 85 (1997)

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

G. M. Shore, hep-ph/9812354

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [2]

G. M. Shore, Lect. Notes Phys. 737, 235 (2008)

work page 2008

[3] [3]

Witten, Nucl

E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 156, 269 (1979)

1979

[4] [4]

Veneziano, Nucl

G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 159, 213 (1979)

1979

[5] [5]

Cichy et al

K. Cichy et al. [ETM], JHEP 09, 020 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

Di Vecchia and G

P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 171, 253 (1980)

1980

[7] [7]

Witten, Annals Phys

E. Witten, Annals Phys. 128, 363 (1980)

1980

[8] [8]

Leutwyler, Nucl

H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 64, 223 (1998)

work page 1998