Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Blockchain Meets LLMs: A Living Survey on Bidirectional Integration

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A living survey of blockchain and large language models argues that the two technologies are converging in two directions and six development areas, with each side supplying what the other lacks.

desk verdict A sensible two-direction taxonomy, but the load-bearing references are broken—the survey can't be trusted until the bibliography is rebuilt. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16809 v1 pith:RVGDZLJ5 submitted 2024-11-25 cs.CR cs.AI

Jianghao Gong , Peiqi Yan , Yue Zhang , Hongli An , Logan Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords blockchainlargelanguagemodelssmartcontractauditingdecentralizedfederatedlearningAIDAOgovernanceprivacyprotectionlivingsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a living survey of the technical convergence between blockchain and large language models. It organizes current research into six development directions under two headings: using blockchain to strengthen LLMs, and using LLMs to strengthen blockchain. The directions are data management and privacy protection, decentralized model training, decentralized AI, smart contract auditing, vulnerability detection, and DAO language interaction and decision support. The survey's stated purpose is to give researchers a shared map of where integration already has evidence and where it remains prospective, pairing each technology's core weakness with the other's core strength.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the survey's organizing taxonomy: two directions, six development areas. The blockchain-to-LLM side covers privacy-preserving data sharing and training, decentralized federated learning and incentive mechanisms, and decentralized AI systems such as GradientCoin and opML. The LLM-to-blockchain side covers smart contract auditing frameworks such as iAudit and FTSmartAudit, vulnerability-constrained decoding during code completion, and LLM-based DAO proposal classification. The taxonomy does the work of turning a scattered set of systems into a map: each area is defined by the blockchain feature it exploits or the LLM capability it applies, and the map becomes a checklist for where integration has evidence and where it is still prospective.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to resolve every citation in the survey against arXiv and publisher databases. If the PDPChain system named in Section II-A2 cannot be located because its '[?]' citation is unresolvable, and if the duplicated paper [27]/[31]/[35] is counted once, the survey's census of the field shrinks; enough failed references would mean the claimed six-direction map cannot be confirmed as a faithful representation of the literature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that blockchain and large language models are already bidirectionally integrating, and that this integration is best understood through six development directions: data management and privacy protection, decentralized model training, decentralized AI, smart contract auditing, vulnerability detection, and DAO language interaction and decision support. In the blockchain-to-LLM direction, the survey argues that blockchain's decentralization, immutability, traceability, and tamper-proof storage can mitigate LLM weaknesses in data privacy, single-point-of-failure training, and trust in generated content. In the LLM-to-blockchain direction, it argues that LLMs' natural-language and code-generation abilities can strengthen smart contract security auditing, vulnerability detection, and decentralized governance. The survey supports each direction with concrete named systems, including federated-learning platforms, audit frameworks, and a DAO proposal classifier reported at 95 percent accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's map of the field depends on every cited system being real, correctly attributed, and described faithfully; that premise is not guaranteed by the paper itself, since PDPChain is cited with an unresolved '[?]' and one arXiv paper appears three times as [27], [31], and [35].

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Blockchain can serve as a decentralized coordination and incentive layer for federated LLM training, removing the central server as a single point of failure.
  • LLM-based tools can substantially automate smart contract auditing, from vulnerability detection to repair suggestion, complementing traditional static and dynamic analyzers.
  • DAO governance can scale proposal review with LLM classification, but the survey's cited work shows that transparency and consistency gaps must be resolved first.
  • The convergence remains in an exploratory stage: most of the systems cited are research proposals or early frameworks rather than production deployments.
  • The two technologies' constraint sets line up, so the direction of integration is not symmetric: blockchain supplies verification and provenance, while LLMs supply interpretation and generation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to measure the six directions bibliometrically: count peer-reviewed systems per direction and track growth rates over time, which would reveal which directions rest on mature results and which rest on isolated preprints.
  • The survey's implicit pairing principle, where each technology's weakness maps onto the other's strength, suggests a design template for future systems: identify one LLM limitation, then select the blockchain property of immutability, traceability, decentralization, or incentives that addresses it, and vice versa.
  • Because the paper's own examples concentrate on audits and decentralized training, the map can be read as predicting that the most immediately practical integrations are LLM-assisted code security and blockchain-mediated federated learning.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents itself as a living survey of the bidirectional integration of blockchain and large language models. The abstract announces two directions of technical convergence: applying large language models to blockchain, where six major development directions are claimed, and applying blockchain to large language models. The body reviews a range of topics including privacy-preserving data sharing, decentralized federated learning, decentralized AI, smart contract auditing, DAO governance, and the advantages and constraints of both technologies. The paper's central contribution is intended to be a usable map of current research on blockchain-LLM integration.

Significance. The topic is timely and the intended two-direction taxonomy could serve as a convenient entry point for researchers entering this emerging area. The paper touches on genuinely active lines of work, such as blockchain-based privacy protection for LLM training data, decentralized federated learning, LLM-based smart contract auditing, and LLM support for DAO governance. However, a survey's only product is reliable synthesis, and the manuscript's citation apparatus is not reliable: it contains an unresolved placeholder citation, duplicate references that inflate the apparent volume of distinct contributions, use of a retracted source as uncontested evidence, and a structural mismatch between the abstract's claimed six directions and the actual section organization. The paper provides no search protocol, inclusion criteria, or other methodological scaffolding that would support the representativeness of its chosen sources. Because the central map is only as trustworthy as its citations, these are load-bearing defects rather than cosmetic ones.

major comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Section II] The abstract states that the paper identifies six major development directions under the application of large language models to blockchain, but Section II organizes six labeled subsections (A-F) of which A-C are blockchain-for-LLM topics and D-F are LLM-for-blockchain topics. The six directions are never explicitly enumerated, and subsections D and E both address smart contract auditing and vulnerability detection, so the claimed six-direction map is not reproducible from the text.
  2. [II-A2] The description of the PDPChain system rests entirely on the citation "Liang [?]", with no resolvable reference in the bibliography. This leaves a key example under the data management and privacy protection direction without a verifiable primary source, directly undermining the survey's reliability.
  3. [II-D, II-E, references [24], [27], [31], [35], [42]] Two works are each cited multiple times as if they were distinct contributions: the vulnerability-constrained decoding paper by Storhaug et al. appears as both [24] and [42], and the fine-tuned smart contract auditing paper by Wei et al. appears as [27], [31], and [35]. These duplicates inflate the apparent number of independent research results behind the smart contract auditing directions and create inconsistencies in the narrative.
  4. [IV-B4, reference [62]] Section IV.B.4 quotes reference [62] as uncontested evidence for blockchain traceability in food supply chains, but the bibliography itself marks this source as "[retracted]". Using a retracted paper as a supporting citation without any caveat is a serious reliability flaw in a survey.
  5. [I] The passage on the blockchain trilemma states that "the original trilemma of scalability, decentralization, security, and trust has expanded into a four-fold challenge," yet it lists four properties as the original trilemma and then lists the same four properties as the expansion. This is internally inconsistent and confuses the paper's framing of blockchain constraints.
  6. [VI, references [69]-[80]] The future-directions discussion relies heavily on references [69]-[80], most of which are authored or co-authored by the same author and concern federated learning, cloud robotics, smart cities, and network slicing rather than blockchain-LLM integration. The section asserts the relevance of these works to blockchain-LLM convergence without argument, so the prospects discussion does not provide independent support for the survey's map and raises concerns about the breadth of the literature considered.
minor comments (5)
  1. [I, reference [5]] The text uses reference [5], which is a paper on extracting training data from diffusion models, to support a claim about LLMs disclosing personal identity information; the mismatch should be corrected.
  2. [II-E heading] The heading "Vulnerablilities detection" contains a spelling error; it should read "Vulnerability detection".
  3. [Author affiliation] The affiliation text contains the typo "Blockchian Group"; it should read "Blockchain Group".
  4. [Figure caption] The text refers to a figure "blockchain.png" at the end of the manuscript, but no figure is included or discussed in the body of the paper.
  5. [III] Section III largely repeats material already covered in Section II, often with vaguer summaries (for example, III.A.1 and III.B.2 do not add new technical content), and could be merged or referenced to Section II to avoid redundancy.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: survey taxonomy is a literature synthesis, not a fitted or self-justifying result.

full rationale

This is a narrative survey, so there is no fitted parameter, quantitative prediction, or mathematical derivation chain whose output could reduce to its inputs by construction. The paper's central contribution is a six-direction taxonomy of blockchain-LLM integration, and that taxonomy is assembled from external cited works rather than derived from assumptions defined in terms of the conclusion. The only self-citation cluster is in Section VI ('Prospects'), where references [69]-[80] include many works by co-author B. Liu on federated learning, cloud robotics, network slicing, and traffic prediction. Those citations are used as illustrative evidence that distributed learning systems and specialized infrastructure hold future potential; they are not used to define the taxonomy or to force any of the paper's six claimed directions. The prospects discussion is speculative and non-load-bearing for the survey's central map, so the self-citations do not constitute circularity under the stated rules. Citation-integrity problems noted elsewhere in the paper, such as the unresolved '[?]' reference for PDPChain in Section II-A2, the duplicated references [27]=[31]=[35] and [24]=[42], and the use of retracted reference [62] as uncontested evidence, are serious reliability and correctness concerns for a survey, but they are not instances of a derivation or prediction being equivalent to its inputs. Per the hard rules, such issues do not raise the circularity score. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input, and no self-citation chain forces the paper's central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

A survey's central claim rests on the reliability of its cited sources and the representativeness of its selection. No free parameters are involved. The main axioms are that the cited works are real and correctly summarized, that the two-direction taxonomy is complete, and that blockchain's properties are as commonly described. The first axiom is already violated by the unresolved '[?]' citation and duplicated references.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited papers are real and are accurately summarized.
    The survey's conclusions rest entirely on its references; Section II-A2 has an unresolved '[?]' citation, and the reference list contains duplicates, so this assumption is already violated.
  • domain assumption The two-direction taxonomy and the 'six major development directions' are a meaningful and complete organization of the field.
    No literature selection methodology is given, and the body text does not explicitly enumerate six directions, so the coverage claim is unsupported.
  • domain assumption Blockchain technologies have the properties described, including decentralization, immutability, and traceability.
    The paper relies on standard characterizations from prior surveys; this is background knowledge, not a contribution of the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blockchain Meets LLMs: A Living Survey on Bidirectional Integration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RVGDZLJ5

@misc{pith2026241116809,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blockchain Meets LLMs: A Living Survey on Bidirectional Integration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RVGDZLJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16809}
}
read the original abstract

In the domain of large language models, considerable advancements have been attained in multimodal large language models and explainability research, propelled by the continuous technological progress and innovation. Nonetheless, security and privacy concerns continue to pose as prominent challenges in this field. The emergence of blockchain technology, marked by its decentralized nature, tamper-proof attributes, distributed storage functionality, and traceability, has provided novel approaches for resolving these issues. Both of these technologies independently hold vast potential for development; yet, their combination uncovers substantial cross-disciplinary opportunities and growth prospects. The current research tendencies are increasingly concentrating on the integration of blockchain with large language models, with the aim of compensating for their respective limitations through this fusion and promoting further technological evolution. In this study, we evaluate the advantages and developmental constraints of the two technologies, and explore the possibility and development potential of their combination. This paper primarily investigates the technical convergence in two directions: Firstly, the application of large language models to blockchain, where we identify six major development directions and explore solutions to the shortcomings of blockchain technology and their application scenarios; Secondly, the application of blockchain technology to large language models, leveraging the characteristics of blockchain to remedy the deficiencies of large language models and exploring its application potential in multiple fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Leveraging fine-tuned language models for efficient and accurate smart contract auditing,

    Z. Wei, J. Sun, Z. Zhang, X. Zhang, and M. Li, “Leveraging fine-tuned language models for efficient and accurate smart contract auditing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13918 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [42]

    Efficient avoidance of vulnerabilities in auto-completed smart contract code usi ng vulnerability-constrained decoding,

    A. Storhaug, J. Li, and T. Hu, “Efficient avoidance of vulnerabilities in auto-completed smart contract code usi ng vulnerability-constrained decoding,” in 2023 IEEE 34th In- ternational Symposium on Software Reliability Engineerin g (ISSRE), pp. 683–693, IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [62]

    [retracted] blockchain-based secure traceable scheme for food supply chain,

    S. Thangamayan, K. Pradhan, G. B. Loganathan, S. Sitend er, S. Sivamani, and M. Tesema, “[retracted] blockchain-based secure traceable scheme for food supply chain,” Journal of F ood Quality, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 4728840, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [69]

    Lifelong federate d reinforcement learning: a learning architecture for navig ation in cloud robotic systems,

    B. Liu, L. Wang, M. Liu, and C.-Z. Xu, “Lifelong federate d reinforcement learning: a learning architecture for navig ation in cloud robotic systems,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 4555–4562, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [80]

    LLM-Slice: Dedicated Wireless Network Slicing for Large Language Models

    B. Liu, J. Tong, and J. Zhang, “Llm-slice: Dedicated wir eless network slicing for large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18499, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  6. [49]

    Blockchain large language models,

    Y . Gai, L. Zhou, K. Qin, D. Song, and A. Ger- vais, “Blockchain large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12749, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  7. [1]

    Assessing the utility of multimodal large language models (gpt-4 vi- sion and large language and vision assistant) in identifyin g melanoma across different skin tones,

    K. Cirone, M. Akrout, L. Abid, and A. Oakley, “Assessing the utility of multimodal large language models (gpt-4 vi- sion and large language and vision assistant) in identifyin g melanoma across different skin tones,” JMIR dermatology , vol. 7, p. e55508, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [2]

    Language models can explain neurons in language models,

    S. Bills, N. Cammarata, D. Mossing, H. Tillman, L. Gao, G. Goh, I. Sutskever, J. Leike, J. Wu, and W. Saunders, “Language models can explain neurons in language models,” URL https://openaipublic. blob. core. windows. net/neuro n- explainer/paper/index. html.(Date accessed: 14.05. 2023 ), vol. 2, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 78 references
  1. [3]

    Git-mol: A multi-modal large language model for molecular science with graph, im- age, and text,

    P . Liu, Y . Ren, J. Tao, and Z. Ren, “Git-mol: A multi-modal large language model for molecular science with graph, im- age, and text,” Computers in biology and medicine , vol. 171, p. 108073, 2024

    2024

  2. [4]

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models,

    G. Team, R. Anil, S. Borgeaud, J.-B. Alayrac, J. Y u, R. Sor i- cut, J. Schalkwyk, A. M. Dai, A. Hauth, K. Millican, et al. , “Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  3. [5]

    Extract- ing training data from diffusion models,

    N. Carlini, J. Hayes, M. Nasr, M. Jagielski, V . Sehwag, F. Tramer, B. Balle, D. Ippolito, and E. Wallace, “Extract- ing training data from diffusion models,” in 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23) , pp. 5253–5270, 2023

    2023

  4. [6]

    Attention is not all you need: the complicate d case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine,

    S. Harrer, “Attention is not all you need: the complicate d case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine,” EBioMedicine, vol. 90, 2023

    2023

  5. [7]

    A sur- vey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,

    L. Huang, W. Y u, W. Ma, W. Zhong, Z. Feng, H. Wang, Q. Chen, W. Peng, X. Feng, B. Qin, et al. , “A sur- vey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05232, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [8]

    Blockcha in technology in supply chain operations: Applications, chal - lenges and research opportunities,

    P . Dutta, T.-M. Choi, S. Somani, and R. Butala, “Blockcha in technology in supply chain operations: Applications, chal - lenges and research opportunities,” Transportation research part e: Logistics and transportation review , vol. 142, p. 102067, 2020

    2020

  7. [9]

    Blockchain for cybersecurity in edge networks,

    A. Hazra, A. Alkhayyat, and M. Adhikari, “Blockchain for cybersecurity in edge networks,” IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 2022

    2022

  8. [10]

    A systematic review of blockchain scalability: Issues, solutions, analysis and f uture research,

    A. I. Sanka and R. C. Cheung, “A systematic review of blockchain scalability: Issues, solutions, analysis and f uture research,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications , vol. 195, p. 103232, 2021

    2021

  9. [11]

    Blockchained on-device federated learning,

    H. Kim, J. Park, M. Bennis, and S.-L. Kim, “Blockchained on-device federated learning,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1279–1283, 2019

    2019

  10. [12]

    Baffle: Blockchain based ag - gregator free federated learning,

    P . Ramanan and K. Nakayama, “Baffle: Blockchain based ag - gregator free federated learning,” in 2020 IEEE international conference on blockchain (Blockchain) , pp. 72–81, IEEE, 2020

    2020

  11. [13]

    Fedstellar: A platform for decentralized federated learn ing,

    E. Tom´ as Mart´ ınez Beltr´ an,´A. L. Perales G´ omez, C. Feng, P . M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, S. L´ opez Bernal, G. Bovet, M. Gil P´ erez, G. Mart´ ınez P´ erez, and A. Huertas Celdr´ an, “Fedstellar: A platform for decentralized federated learn ing,” arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv...

    2023

  12. [14]

    Vdfchain: Secure and verifiable decentralized federated learning via commit tee- based blockchain,

    M. Zhou, Z. Yang, H. Y u, and S. Y u, “Vdfchain: Secure and verifiable decentralized federated learning via commit tee- based blockchain,” Journal of Network and Computer Appli- cations, vol. 223, p. 103814, 2024

    2024

  13. [15]

    Decentralized federated learning through prox y model sharing,

    S. Kalra, J. Wen, J. C. Cresswell, M. V olkovs, and H. R. Tizhoosh, “Decentralized federated learning through prox y model sharing,” Nature communications , vol. 14, no. 1, p. 2899, 2023

    2023

  14. [16]

    Incentive mechanism design for joint resource allocation in blockcha in- based federated learning,

    Z. Wang, Q. Hu, R. Li, M. Xu, and Z. Xiong, “Incentive mechanism design for joint resource allocation in blockcha in- based federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems , vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1536–1547, 2023

    2023

  15. [17]

    Incentive mechanism design for federated learning: A two- stage stackelberg game approach,

    G. Xiao, M. Xiao, G. Gao, S. Zhang, H. Zhao, and X. Zou, “Incentive mechanism design for federated learning: A two- stage stackelberg game approach,” in 2020 IEEE 26th In- ternational Conference on Parallel and Distributed System s (ICPADS), pp. 148–155, IEEE, 2020

    2020

  16. [18]

    Fdfl: Fair and discrepancy-aware incentive mechanism for federated learning,

    Z. Chen, H. Zhang, X. Li, Y . Miao, X. Zhang, M. Zhang, S. Ma, and R. H. Deng, “Fdfl: Fair and discrepancy-aware incentive mechanism for federated learning,” IEEE Transac- tions on Information F orensics and Security , 2024

    2024

  17. [19]

    The use of blockchain to support distributed ai implementation in iot systems,

    S. M. Alrubei, E. Ball, and J. M. Rigelsford, “The use of blockchain to support distributed ai implementation in iot systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 14790–14802, 2021

    2021

  18. [20]

    Efficient and scalable reinforcement learning for large-scale netwo rk control,

    C. Ma, A. Li, Y . Du, H. Dong, and Y . Yang, “Efficient and scalable reinforcement learning for large-scale netwo rk control,” Nature Machine Intelligence , pp. 1–15, 2024

    2024

  19. [21]

    Gradientcoin: A peer-to- peer decentralized large language models,

    Y . Gao, Z. Song, and J. Yin, “Gradientcoin: A peer-to- peer decentralized large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10502, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  20. [22]

    opml: Op- timistic machine learning on blockchain,

    K. Conway, C. So, X. Y u, and K. Wong, “opml: Op- timistic machine learning on blockchain,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17555, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [23]

    Smartvm: A smart contract virtual machine for fast on- chain dnn computations,

    T. Li, Y . Fang, Y . Lu, J. Yang, Z. Jian, Z. Wan, and Y . Li, “Smartvm: A smart contract virtual machine for fast on- chain dnn computations,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems , vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 4100–4116, 2022

    2022

  22. [25]

    Unveiling the potential of chatgpt in detecting machine unauditable bugs in smart contracts: A preliminary evaluation and categorizat ion,

    B. Gao, Q. Wei, Y . Liu, and R. S. M. Goh, “Unveiling the potential of chatgpt in detecting machine unauditable bugs in smart contracts: A preliminary evaluation and categorizat ion,” in 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) , pp. 1481–1486, IEEE, 2024

    2024

  23. [26]

    Combining fine-tuning and llm-based agents for intuitive smart contract auditing with justifications,

    W. Ma, D. Wu, Y . Sun, T. Wang, S. Liu, J. Zhang, Y . Xue, and Y . Liu, “Combining fine-tuning and llm-based agents for intuitive smart contract auditing with justifications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16073, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [28]

    Auditgpt: Auditing smart contracts with chatgpt,

    S. Xia, S. Shao, M. He, T. Y u, L. Song, and Y . Zhang, “Auditgpt: Auditing smart contracts with chatgpt,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04306, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [29]

    Sc-bench: A large- scale dataset for smart contract auditing,

    S. Xia, M. He, L. Song, and Y . Zhang, “Sc-bench: A large- scale dataset for smart contract auditing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06176, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [30]

    Do you still need a manual smart contract audit?,

    I. David, L. Zhou, K. Qin, D. Song, L. Cavallaro, and A. Gervais, “Do you still need a manual smart contract audit?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12338 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Detecting buggy contracts via smart testing,

    S. Junsong Wang, J. Yao, K. Pei, H. Takahashi, and J. Yang , “Detecting buggy contracts via smart testing,” arXiv e-prints , pp. arXiv–2409, 2024

    2024

  28. [33]

    Llmsmartse c: Smart contract security auditing with llm and annotated control flow graph,

    V . Mothukuri, R. M. Parizi, and J. L. Massa, “Llmsmartse c: Smart contract security auditing with llm and annotated control flow graph,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) , pp. 434–441, IEEE, 2024

    2024

  29. [34]

    Llm-smartaudit: Ad- vanced smart contract vulnerability detection,

    Z. Wei, J. Sun, Z. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Llm-smartaudit: Ad- vanced smart contract vulnerability detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09381, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Llm4fuzz: Guided fuzzing of smart contracts with large language models,

    C. Shou, J. Liu, D. Lu, and K. Sen, “Llm4fuzz: Guided fuzzing of smart contracts with large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11108, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Classifying proposals of decentralized autonomous organizations using large language models,

    C. Ziegler, M. Miranda, G. Cao, G. Arentoft, and D. W. Nam, “Classifying proposals of decentralized autonomous organizations using large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.07059, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Demystifying the dao governance process,

    J. Ma, M. Jiang, J. Jiang, X. Luo, Y . Hu, Y . Zhou, Q. Wang, and F. Zhang, “Demystifying the dao governance process,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11758 , 2024

    2024

  33. [39]

    Generative ai in the construction industry: Opportunities & challenges,

    P . Ghimire, K. Kim, and M. Acharya, “Generative ai in the construction industry: Opportunities & challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04427, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Automatic smart contract comment generation via large language models and in-context learning,

    J. Zhao, X. Chen, G. Yang, and Y . Shen, “Automatic smart contract comment generation via large language models and in-context learning,” Information and Software Technology , vol. 168, p. 107405, 2024

    2024

  35. [41]

    Large lan- guage model-powered smart contract vulnerability detecti on: New perspectives,

    S. Hu, T. Huang, F. ˙ Ilhan, S. F. Tekin, and L. Liu, “Large lan- guage model-powered smart contract vulnerability detecti on: New perspectives,” in 2023 5th IEEE International Confer- ence on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) , pp. ...

    2023

  36. [43]

    Revolutionizing cryptocurrency operations: The role of domain-specific large language models (llms),

    H. Qin, “Revolutionizing cryptocurrency operations: The role of domain-specific large language models (llms),” Interna- tional Journal of Computer Trends and Technology , vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 101–113, 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    Convergence of ai, iot, big data and blockchain: a review,

    K. Rabah et al. , “Convergence of ai, iot, big data and blockchain: a review,” The lake institute Journal , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2018

    2018

  38. [45]

    S- gram: towards semantic-aware security auditing for ethere um smart contracts,

    H. Liu, C. Liu, W. Zhao, Y . Jiang, and J. Sun, “S- gram: towards semantic-aware security auditing for ethere um smart contracts,” in Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE international conference on automated software engineeri ng, pp. 814–819, 2018

    2018

  39. [46]

    Privacy preserving large language models: Chatgpt case study based vision and framework,

    I. Ullah, N. Hassan, S. S. Gill, B. Suleiman, T. A. Ahange r, Z. Shah, J. Qadir, and S. S. Kanhere, “Privacy preserving large language models: Chatgpt case study based vision and framework,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12523 , 2023

    arXiv

  40. [47]

    De- velopment of a question answering chatbot for blockchain domain,

    A. Mansurova, A. Nugumanova, and Z. Makhambetova, “De- velopment of a question answering chatbot for blockchain domain,” Scientific Journal of Astana IT University , pp. 27– 40, 2023

    2023

  41. [48]

    Ai-driven ux/ui design: Empirical research and applications in fintech,

    Y . Xu, Y . Liu, H. Xu, and H. Tan, “Ai-driven ux/ui design: Empirical research and applications in fintech,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Tech- nology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 99–109, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Large language models for cyber security: A systematic literature review,

    H. Xu, S. Wang, N. Li, Y . Zhao, K. Chen, K. Wang, Y . Liu, T. Y u, and H. Wang, “Large language models for cyber security: A systematic literature review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04760, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Checking smart contracts with structural code embedding,

    Z. Gao, L. Jiang, X. Xia, D. Lo, and J. Grundy, “Checking smart contracts with structural code embedding,” IEEE Trans- actions on Software Engineering , vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2874– 2891, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Large language models for forecasting and anomaly detection: A systematic literatur e review,

    J. Su, C. Jiang, X. Jin, Y . Qiao, T. Xiao, H. Ma, R. Wei, Z. Jing, J. Xu, and J. Lin, “Large language models for forecasting and anomaly detection: A systematic literatur e review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10350 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Language models are few-shot learners,

    T. B. Brown, “Language models are few-shot learners,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165, 2020

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A survey of gpt-3 family large language mo dels including chatgpt and gpt-4,

    K. S. Kalyan, “A survey of gpt-3 family large language mo dels including chatgpt and gpt-4,” Natural Language Processing Journal, p. 100048, 2023

    2023

  47. [55]

    Llms in e-commerce: a comparative analysis of gpt and llama models in product review evaluation,

    K. I. Roumeliotis, N. D. Tselikas, and D. K. Nasiopoulos , “Llms in e-commerce: a comparative analysis of gpt and llama models in product review evaluation,” Natural Language Processing Journal, vol. 6, p. 100056, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Exploring human-like translatio n strategy with large language models,

    Z. He, T. Liang, W. Jiao, Z. Zhang, Y . Yang, R. Wang, Z. Tu, S. Shi, and X. Wang, “Exploring human-like translatio n strategy with large language models,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , vol. 12, pp. 229– 246, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Chatgpt for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,

    E. Kasneci, K. Seßler, S. K¨ uchemann, M. Bannert, D. De- mentieva, F. Fischer, U. Gasser, G. Groh, S. G¨ unnemann, E. H¨ ullermeier,et al., “Chatgpt for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and individual differences , vol. 1...

    2023

  50. [58]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. V aswani, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2017

    2017

  51. [59]

    Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash sys- tem,

    S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash sys- tem,” Satoshi Nakamoto , 2008

    2008

  52. [60]

    An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, ad- vances and platforms,

    Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, W. Chen, X. Chen, J. Weng, and M. Imran, “An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, ad- vances and platforms,” Future Generation Computer Systems , vol. 105, pp. 475–491, 2020

    2020

  53. [61]

    Blockchain for inter net of things: A survey,

    H.-N. Dai, Z. Zheng, and Y . Zhang, “Blockchain for inter net of things: A survey,” IEEE internet of things journal , vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8076–8094, 2019

    2019

  54. [63]

    Large language models for blockchain security: A systematic literature review,

    Z. He, Z. Li, and S. Yang, “Large language models for blockchain security: A systematic literature review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14280, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Decentralized and collab ora- tive ai on blockchain,

    J. D. Harris and B. Waggoner, “Decentralized and collab ora- tive ai on blockchain,” in 2019 IEEE international conference on blockchain (Blockchain) , pp. 368–375, IEEE, 2019

    2019

  56. [65]

    Blockchain convergence: Ana l- ysis of issues affecting iot, ai and blockchain,

    S. Guergov and N. Radwan, “Blockchain convergence: Ana l- ysis of issues affecting iot, ai and blockchain,” International Journal of Computations, Information and Manufacturing (IJCIM), vol. 1, no. 1, 2021

    2021

  57. [66]

    Intersect ion of ai and blockchain technology: Concerns and prospects,

    K. B. Vikhyath, R. Sanjana, and N. Vismitha, “Intersect ion of ai and blockchain technology: Concerns and prospects,” in The International Conference on Deep Learning, Big Data and Blockchain (Deep-BDB 2021) , pp. 53–66, Springer, 2022

    2021

  58. [67]

    Revolutionizing cyber threat detection with large language models: A privac y- preserving bert-based lightweight model for iot/iiot devi ces,

    M. A. Ferrag, M. Ndhlovu, N. Tihanyi, L. C. Cordeiro, M. Debbah, T. Lestable, and N. S. Thandi, “Revolutionizing cyber threat detection with large language models: A privac y- preserving bert-based lightweight model for iot/iiot devi ces,” IEEE Access , 2024

    2024

  59. [68]

    Blockchain smart contracts formalizati on: Approaches and challenges to address vulnerabilities,

    A. Singh, R. M. Parizi, Q. Zhang, K.-K. R. Choo, and A. Dehghantanha, “Blockchain smart contracts formalizati on: Approaches and challenges to address vulnerabilities,” Com- puters & Security , vol. 88, p. 101654, 2020

    2020

  60. [70]

    Federated imitati on learning: A novel framework for cloud robotic systems with heterogeneous sensor data,

    B. Liu, L. Wang, M. Liu, and C.-Z. Xu, “Federated imitati on learning: A novel framework for cloud robotic systems with heterogeneous sensor data,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3509–3516, 2019

    2019

  61. [71]

    Peer-assisted robotic learning: a data-driven collabora tive learning approach for cloud robotic systems,

    B. Liu, L. Wang, X. Chen, L. Huang, D. Han, and C.-Z. Xu, “Peer-assisted robotic learning: a data-driven collabora tive learning approach for cloud robotic systems,” in 2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA ), pp. 4062–4070, IEEE, 2021

    2021

  62. [72]

    Experiments of federated learning for covid-19 chest x-ray images,

    B. Liu, B. Yan, Y . Zhou, Y . Yang, and Y . Zhang, “Experiments of federated learning for covid-19 chest x-ray images,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05592, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  63. [73]

    Fedcm: A real-time contribution measurement method for participants in federated learning,

    B. Yan, B. Liu, L. Wang, Y . Zhou, Z. Liang, M. Liu, and C.-Z . Xu, “Fedcm: A real-time contribution measurement method for participants in federated learning,” in 2021 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) , pp. 1–8, IEEE, 2021

    2021

  64. [74]

    Elasticros: An elastically col- laborative robot operation system for fog and cloud robotic s,

    B. Liu, L. Wang, and M. Liu, “Elasticros: An elastically col- laborative robot operation system for fog and cloud robotic s,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01774 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Authros: Secure data sharing among robot operating systems based on ethereum,

    S. Zhang, W. Li, X. Li, and B. Liu, “Authros: Secure data sharing among robot operating systems based on ethereum,” in 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) , pp. 147–156, IEEE, 2022

    2022

  66. [76]

    Roboec2: A novel cloud robotic system with dynamic network offloading assisted by amazon ec2,

    B. Liu, L. Wang, and M. Liu, “Roboec2: A novel cloud robotic system with dynamic network offloading assisted by amazon ec2,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023

    2023

  67. [77]

    Applications of federated learning in smart cities: recen t ad- vances, taxonomy, and open challenges,

    Z. Zheng, Y . Zhou, Y . Sun, Z. Wang, B. Liu, and K. Li, “Applications of federated learning in smart cities: recen t ad- vances, taxonomy, and open challenges,” Connection Science, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2022

    2022

  68. [78]

    Singular po int probability improve lstm network performance for long-ter m traffic flow prediction,

    B. Liu, J. Cheng, K. Cai, P . Shi, and X. Tang, “Singular po int probability improve lstm network performance for long-ter m traffic flow prediction,” in Theoretical Computer Science: 35th National Conference, NCTCS 2017, Wuhan, China, October 14-15, 2017, Proceedings , pp. 328–...

    2017

  69. [79]

    Edgeloc: A communicatio n- adaptive parallel system for real-time localization in infrastructure-assisted autonomous driving,

    B. Liu, J. Tong, and Y . Zhuang, “Edgeloc: A communicatio n- adaptive parallel system for real-time localization in infrastructure-assisted autonomous driving,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12120, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  70. [81]

    Blockchain-based initiati ves: current state and challenges,

    S. Alam, M. Shuaib, W. Z. Khan, S. Garg, G. Kaddoum, M. S. Hossain, and Y . B. Zikria, “Blockchain-based initiati ves: current state and challenges,” Computer Networks , vol. 198, p. 108395, 2021. This figure "blockchain.png" is available in "png" format from: http://arxiv.org...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.