Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Magneto-optical evidence of tilting effect in coupled Weyl bands

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Magneto-infrared spectra of niobium phosphide show low-energy Landau-level transitions that only a model with tilted Weyl points can explain.

desk verdict Plausible spectroscopic evidence for tilt-induced selection-rule relaxation in NbP, but the Γ-point-only calculation is a load-bearing approximation that needs testing. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17081 v2 pith:ATHYHVEF submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Seongphill Moon , Yuxuan Jiang , Jennifer Neu , Theo Siegrist , Mykhaylo Ozerov , Zhigang Jiang , Dmitry Smirnov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords WeylsemimetalbandtiltingLandaulevelsmagneto-opticalspectroscopyselectionrulesniobiumphosphidecoupledpointsinfraredreflectance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Weyl semimetals are materials whose electrons near discrete band-touching points behave like massless particles, and theory predicts these 'Weyl points' are generically tilted in real crystals. This paper reports that the tilting can be seen directly in the magneto-infrared reflectance of niobium phosphide (NbP). The authors observe Landau-level transitions with flat and negative magnetic-field dispersions that a standard isolated-Weyl-point model cannot explain, and they show that a four-band model with coupled, tilted Weyl points reproduces the data, including several intense low-energy transitions that are forbidden when the tilt is switched off. The paper argues these forbidden transitions are spectroscopic evidence that tilted Weyl bands exist and that tilting relaxes optical selection rules.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the four-band coupled tilted Weyl-point Hamiltonian $H = v\tau_x(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot\mathbf{p}) + m\tau_z + b\sigma_x + T(\mathbf{p})$, where the term $T(\mathbf{p}) = v(t_x p_x \tau_x + t_y p_y + t_z p_z)$ encodes the tilt of the Weyl cones, $b$ creates the Weyl points, and $m$ hybridizes them. The paper computes Landau levels from this Hamiltonian via Peierls substitution and obtains optical transition intensities from Fermi's golden rule, keeping only the optical weight from the $\Gamma$ point where the joint density of states diverges. The mechanism that carries the argument is tilt-induced mixing of Landau-level wavefunctions: the tilt redistributes optical weight and breaks the conventional selection rules, so transitions that are forbidden in the non-tilt model become visible. That is why the appearance of the low-energy modes in the data can be attributed to the tilt.

What would settle it

Compute the magneto-optical conductivity from the same four-band Hamiltonian with the same tilt parameters but integrate the full $k_z$-resolved Landau-level contributions instead of keeping only the $\Gamma$-point weight; if the low-energy forbidden transitions below 60 meV lose most of their intensity, the observed spectra would no longer single out the tilt mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the tilting of coupled Weyl points in NbP relaxes the optical selection rules in a measurable way. Using the four-band Hamiltonian $H = v\tau_x(\boldsymbol{\sigma}\cdot\mathbf{p}) + m\tau_z + b\sigma_x + T(\mathbf{p})$ with tilt term $T(\mathbf{p}) = v(t_x p_x \tau_x + t_y p_y + t_z p_z)$, the authors compute Landau levels under a magnetic field and compare the resulting inter-Landau-level transition spectra with magneto-infrared reflectance data. In the non-tilt case only a sparse set of transitions appears; including tilt with $t=(0,0.1,0.55)$ generates many additional modes, including low-energy transitions below 60 meV that the data show and the non-tilt model cannot produce. The authors therefore conclude that the observed 'forbidden' transitions constitute spectroscopic evidence of tilted Weyl points, and that the flat and negative-dispersion interband transitions demonstrate the importance of coupling between Weyl points, something a two-band isolated-Weyl model cannot capture.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted spectra are computed with optical weight taken only from the $\Gamma$ point, justified by a divergent joint density of states there; if finite-$k_z$ transitions contribute appreciably, the calculated tilt-versus-non-tilt distinction could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magneto-infrared spectroscopy becomes a practical probe of Weyl-band tilting, complementing photoemission measurements that are surface-sensitive.
  • Any quantitative analysis of inter-Landau-level transitions in NbP-type Weyl semimetals must include both coupling between Weyl points and tilting; non-tilt or two-band models will misassign observed modes.
  • The flat and negative-dispersion transitions observed in NbP are signatures of coupled Weyl points, so similar features in other monopnictide Weyl semimetals should be interpreted through four-band models rather than isolated cones.
  • The fitted tilt and band parameters, $t=(0,0.1,0.55)$, $b=60$ meV, $m=51$ meV, and $v=4.1\times10^5$ m/s, provide a quantitative benchmark against which ab initio band-structure calculations can be tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if tilt relaxes selection rules generically, the same forbidden-transition fingerprint should appear in other Weyl semimetals with different tilt strengths; comparing the intensity of low-energy modes across TaAs, TaP, NbAs, and NbP could map tilt parameters from optics alone.
  • The $\Gamma$-point-only optical weight assumption means the calculation could change once full $k_z$ integration is included; testing that directly would either strengthen the tilt evidence or expose where the model needs refinement.
  • Tilt-induced wavefunction mixing should also alter other magnetic-field responses, such as cyclotron-resonance line shapes and magnetotransport, providing independent checks of the same mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports magneto-infrared Voigt-geometry reflectance measurements on the Weyl semimetal NbP and compares the observed Landau-level (LL) transition series with a four-band coupled Weyl point model. The authors find flat and negative-dispersion interband transitions that require a four-band description, and they argue that including a band-tilting term relaxes the optical selection rules, allowing low-energy transitions that are forbidden in the non-tilt model. They conclude that the observation of these 'forbidden' transitions is spectroscopic evidence of tilted Weyl bands.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would be a valuable, direct spectroscopic demonstration of band tilting in a canonical Weyl semimetal, complementing previous ARPES-based studies. The paper uses a realistic coupled-Weyl-point model rather than isolated cones, and it accounts for the unusual flat and negative magnetic-field dispersions that had been observed in this family. The prediction that tilting relaxes selection rules is concrete and falsifiable. However, the evidence is semi-quantitative and currently rests on two assumptions—evaluating optical transitions only at the Γ point and refitting band parameters separately in the tilt and non-tilt cases—that need to be tested before the conclusion is robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, paragraph 'We consider only the optical weight from the Γ point...' (after Eq. (1))] This approximation is load-bearing for the central claim. With the magnetic field along the a axis (kx), kx remains a good quantum number, so both the Landau-level energies and the dipole matrix elements depend on kx, and the measured reflectance is an integral over kx. The statement that 'the joint density of states diverges' at the Γ point is not demonstrated for the specific low-energy transitions of interest; Figure 1d is a zero-field dispersion, not a joint density of states. In the non-tilt Hamiltonian, the σ·p and bσx terms can mix Landau levels at finite kx, so transitions that are forbidden at kx = 0 may become allowed once the kx integration is performed. If so, the low-energy modes below 60 meV that are attributed to tilt would appear in the non-tilt calculation as well, and the tilt/non-tilt distinction would collapse. The authors should either perform a full kx-integrated magneto-absorption calculation or provide a quantitative argument that the relevant joint density of states is sharply peaked at kx = 0 for all transitions shown.
  2. [Main text, paragraph 'In the non-tilt case, we directly fit the experiment data...'] The comparison between the non-tilt and tilt cases is not controlled: the non-tilt fit uses b = 50 meV, m = 42 meV, v = 3.3×10^5 m/s, while the tilt fit uses b = 60 meV, m = 51 meV, v = 4.1×10^5 m/s. Since the tilt term T(p) is proportional to v, changing v also changes the tilt amplitude, and all parameter changes alter the Landau-level spectrum and matrix elements. The appearance of additional low-energy modes in Figure 3b could therefore be partly or entirely due to the different band parameters rather than to the tilt term itself. To support the claim that tilting relaxes selection rules, the authors should keep b, m, and v fixed (e.g., at shared ab initio values) and compare t = 0 vs t = (0, 0.1, 0.55), or else systematically vary the parameters and show that the low-energy mode structure is specifically controlled by t.
  3. [Main text, fourth paragraph after 'To analyze the magneto-reflectance spectra' (transition grouping and model…] The experimental transition energies are manually extracted and assigned to four color-coded groups 'based on our detailed comparison with calculations,' which is a post-hoc grouping, and the agreement is assessed visually and described as 'semi-quantitative.' The paper does not report error bars on the extracted transition energies, a fitting metric (e.g., RMS deviation, number of matched modes within a tolerance), or a model-comparison criterion. The statement that 'the non-tilt model cannot reproduce that large number of inter-LL transitions' is therefore not quantitatively supported. A quantitative comparison with uncertainties is needed to establish that the tilt model explains the data significantly better than the non-tilt model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text and Figure 4 caption] The carrier density is stated as 6×10^23 m^-3 in the main text but as 6×10^26 m^-3 in the Figure 4 caption; this three-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy should be corrected, since it directly affects the Fermi level and Pauli blocking in the calculated spectra.
  2. [Main text, paragraph on Γ-point optical weight] The phrase 'the joint density of states diverges as can be seen from Figure 1d' is misleading: Figure 1d is a zero-field band structure, not a joint density of states; the divergence should be demonstrated with a calculation or cited to the Supporting Information.
  3. [Conclusion] The conclusion that the observed modes 'serve as spectroscopic evidence of tilted Weyl bands' is stronger than the current semi-quantitative match supports; a more cautious phrasing such as 'are consistent with' would better reflect the analysis.
  4. [Figure 4 and main text] The definitions of the A-, B-, C-, and D-series would be clearer if introduced in the text before being referenced in Figure 4; currently the reader must infer the correspondence with the black, orange, red, and blue sets.
  5. [General] There are several typographical spacing errors in the main text (e.g., 'TheNbPsinglecrystalstudiedherewasgrownusingthechemicalvaportransportmethod'); a careful proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tilt value comes from an independent ab initio fit, and the selection-rule relaxation is a structural consequence of the model, not a fitted parameter.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) measure magneto-IR spectra; (ii) adopt a four-band coupled WP Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) from earlier work; (iii) import the tilt vector t=(0,0.1,0.55) from an ab initio fit in ref. 26; (iv) fit b, m, v to the experimental data separately for the tilt and non-tilt models; (v) compute Landau-level transitions and selection rules; (vi) infer that the tilt relaxes selection rules. No step is equivalent to its own conclusion. The tilt parameter is not fitted to the magneto-optical transitions that are later called evidence; it is taken from a prior first-principles fit (ref. 26, which overlaps in authorship but is DFT-based and therefore independent of the present reflectance data). The forbidden/allowed character of the low-energy modes is a structural property of the T(p) term, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; the paper explicitly reports b, m, v as 'best fit' values, so the comparison is a model fit rather than a parameter-free prediction, which is standard model selection rather than circularity. The Γ-point-only optical-weight approximation is a genuine correctness risk—finite-kx Landau-level mixing could alter the tilt/non-tilt distinction—but an approximation that may fail is not the same as a derivation that reduces to its inputs. The self-citation to ref. 26 is present and load-bearing for the numerical value of t, but it is supported by external ab initio calculations, so it does not constitute circular evidence under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several model assumptions and fitted parameters. The tilt parameters come from a self-cited ab initio fit, while b, m, and v are fitted to the same experimental spectra. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • b (intrinsic Zeeman effect) = 60 meV (tilt model), 50 meV (non-tilt model)
    Material-specific band parameter in Hamiltonian Eq. 1, fitted to the experimental magneto-absorption spectra for each model.
  • m (hybridization gap) = 51 meV (tilt model), 42 meV (non-tilt model)
    Coupling between Weyl points; fitted to experiment for each model.
  • v (Fermi velocity) = 4.1×10^5 m/s (tilt model), 3.3×10^5 m/s (non-tilt model)
    Band velocity in Eq. 1; fitted to experiment for each model.
  • carrier density n = 6×10^23 m^-3
    Used for Fermi level evolution and Pauli blocking; set in the calculation, no measurement cited.
  • tilt parameters t = (0, 0.1, 0.55)
    Tilt vector in T(p); taken from fitting the four-band model to ab initio calculations in ref 26, not fitted to this experiment, but essential for the tilt-model spectra.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The four-band coupled Weyl Hamiltonian H = v τx(σ·p) + m τz + b σx + T(p) (Eq. 1) accurately describes the low-energy band structure of NbP near the Weyl points.
    Relied on for all Landau level and optical transition calculations; supported by ref 26 comparison to ab initio but not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Only optical weight from the Γ point is needed because the joint density of states diverges there.
    Explicitly stated in the text near Figure 3; if finite-kz contributions matter, the calculated spectra change.
  • domain assumption WP1 Landau levels are negligible because its Fermi velocity along z is zero, making the cyclotron orbit infinitely large.
    Justified by first-principles band structure refs 19, 20, 26; the neglect is load-bearing for interpreting the spectra as WP2 related.
  • standard math Peierls substitution and Fermi's golden rule correctly describe the magneto-optical response.
    Standard methods for Landau level optics; stated in the text ('with Peierls substitution', 'computed using Fermi's golden rule').
  • domain assumption The tilt parameters t=(0, 0.1, 0.55) from ab initio fitting in ref 26 are accurate for NbP.
    The comparison between tilt and non-tilt rests on these values; they come from a self-cited paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magneto-optical evidence of tilting effect in coupled Weyl bands." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ATHYHVEF

@misc{pith2026241117081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magneto-optical evidence of tilting effect in coupled Weyl bands},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ATHYHVEF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17081}
}
read the original abstract

Theories have revealed the universality of the band tilting effect in topological Weyl semimetals (WSMs) and its implications for the material's physical properties. However, the experimental identification of tilted Weyl bands remains much less explored. Here, by combining magneto-infrared optical studies with a four-band coupled Weyl point model, we report spectroscopic evidence of the tilting effect in the well-established WSM niobium phosphide. Specifically, we observe Landau level transitions with rich features that are well reproduced within a model of coupled tilted Weyl points. Our analysis indicates that the tilting effect relaxes the selection rules and gives rise to transitions that would otherwise be forbidden in the non-tilt case. Additionally, we observe unconventional interband transitions with flat and negative magnetic field dispersions, highlighting the importance of coupling between Weyl points. Our results not only emphasize the significance of the tilting effect in the optical responses of WSMs but also demonstrate magneto-optics as an effective tool for probing the tilting effect in electronic band structures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17081 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Unit cell of the tetragonal crystal lattice of NbP. (b) Schematic of the exper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Magneto-reflection measurement results of NbP. False-color plot of the normal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Calculated magneto-absorption spectra of NbP from (a) a non-tilt model and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a,c) False-color plots of the calculated magneto-absorption spectra in (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dirac Fermions in Solids: From High-Tc Cuprates and Graphene to Topological Insulators and Weyl Semimetals

    Vafek, O.; Vishwanath, A. Dirac Fermions in Solids: From High-Tc Cuprates and Graphene to Topological Insulators and Weyl Semimetals. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2014, 5, 83--112

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Jia, S.; Xu, S.-Y.; Hasan, M. Z. Weyl semimetals, Fermi arcs and chiral anomalies. Nature Materials 2016, 15, 1140--1144

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals

    Yan, B.; Felser, C. Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2017, 8, 337--354

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    P.; Mele, E

    Armitage, N. P.; Mele, E. J.; Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 015001

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    M.; Vishwanath, A.; Savrasov, S

    Wan, X.; Turner, A. M.; Vishwanath, A.; Savrasov, S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 205101

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Quantum Hall effects in a Weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates

    Yang, K.-Y.; Lu, Y.-M.; Ran, Y. Quantum Hall effects in a Weyl semimetal: Possible application in pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 075129

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    A.; Balents, L

    Burkov, A. A.; Balents, L. Weyl Semimetal in a Topological Insulator Multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 127205

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Huang, S.-M.; Xu, S.-Y.; Belopolski, I.; Lee, C.-C.; Chang, G.; Wang, B.; Alidoust, N.; Bian, G.; Neupane, M.; Zhang, C.; Jia, S.; Bansil, A.; Lin, H.; Hasan, M. Z. A Weyl fermion semimetal with surface Fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide TaAs class. Nature Communications 2015, 6, 7373

    work page 2015

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A.; Dai, X

    Weng, H.; Fang, C.; Fang, Z.; Bernevig, B. A.; Dai, X. Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 011029

    2015

  2. [10]

    Topological surface states and Fermi arcs of the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals TaAs , TaP , NbAs , and NbP

    Sun, Y.; Wu, S.-C.; Yan, B. Topological surface states and Fermi arcs of the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals TaAs , TaP , NbAs , and NbP . Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 115428

    2015

  3. [11]

    The Adler - Bell - Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal

    Nielsen, H.; Ninomiya, M. The Adler - Bell - Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal. Physics Letters B 1983, 130, 389 -- 396

    1983

  4. [12]

    Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs

    Huang, X.; Zhao, L.; Long, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, D.; Yang, Z.; Liang, H.; Xue, M.; Weng, H.; Fang, Z.; Dai, X.; Chen, G. Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs . Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 031023

    2015

  5. [13]

    Zhang, C.-L. et al. Signatures of the A dler-- B ell-- Jackiw chiral anomaly in a Weyl fermion semimetal. Nature Communications 2016, 7, 10735

    2016

  6. [14]

    a ler, S.; Sergelius, P.; H \

    Niemann, A. C.; Gooth, J.; Wu, S.-C.; B \"a ler, S.; Sergelius, P.; H \"u hne, R.; Rellinghaus, B.; Shekhar, C.; S \"u , V.; Schmidt, M.; Felser, C.; Yan, B.; Nielsch, K. Chiral magnetoresistance in the Weyl semimetal NbP . Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 43394

    2017

  7. [15]

    L.; Thewalt, E.; Little, A.; Analytis, J

    Wu, L.; Patankar, S.; Morimoto, T.; Nair, N. L.; Thewalt, E.; Little, A.; Analytis, J. G.; Moore, J. E.; Orenstein, J. Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Nature Physics 2017, 13, 350--355

    2017

  8. [16]

    A.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Gedik, N

    Ma, Q.; Xu, S.-Y.; Chan, C.-K.; Zhang, C.-L.; Chang, G.; Lin, Y.; Xie, W.; Palacios, T.; Lin, H.; Jia, S.; Lee, P. A.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Gedik, N. Direct optical detection of Weyl fermion chirality in a topological semimetal. Nature Physics 2017, 13, 842--847

    2017

  9. [17]

    B.; Diebel, L

    Osterhoudt, G. B.; Diebel, L. K.; Gray, M. J.; Yang, X.; Stanco, J.; Huang, X.; Shen, B.; Ni, N.; Moll, P. J. W.; Ran, Y.; Burch, K. S. Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic effect in a type-I Weyl semimetal. Nature Materials 2019, 18, 471--475

    2019

  10. [18]

    A.; Gresch, D.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Troyer, M.; Dai, X.; Bernevig, B

    Soluyanov, A. A.; Gresch, D.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Troyer, M.; Dai, X.; Bernevig, B. A. Type-II Weyl semimetals. Nature 2015, 527, 495--498

    2015

  11. [19]

    Hidden type- II Weyl points in the Weyl semimetal NbP

    Wu, S.-C.; Sun, Y.; Felser, C.; Yan, B. Hidden type- II Weyl points in the Weyl semimetal NbP . Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 165113

    2017

  12. [20]

    Influence of anisotropy, tilt and pairing of Weyl nodes: the Weyl semimetals TaAs , TaP , NbAs and NbP

    Grassano, D.; Pulci, O.; Cannuccia, E.; Bechstedt, F. Influence of anisotropy, tilt and pairing of Weyl nodes: the Weyl semimetals TaAs , TaP , NbAs and NbP . The European Physical Journal B 2020, 93, 157

    2020

  13. [21]

    S.; Zhang, X.; Bian, G.; Zheng, H.; others Discovery of Lorentz-violating type II Weyl fermions in LaAlGe

    Xu, S.-Y.; Alidoust, N.; Chang, G.; Lu, H.; Singh, B.; Belopolski, I.; Sanchez, D. S.; Zhang, X.; Bian, G.; Zheng, H.; others Discovery of Lorentz-violating type II Weyl fermions in LaAlGe. Science advances 2017, 3, e1603266

    2017

  14. [22]

    Nature Communications 2017, 8, 257

    Yan, M.; Huang, H.; Zhang, K.; Wang, E.; Yao, W.; Deng, K.; Wan, G.; Zhang, H.; Arita, M.; Yang, H.; others Lorentz-violating type-II Dirac fermions in transition metal dichalcogenide PtTe2. Nature Communications 2017, 8, 257

    2017

  15. [23]

    H.; Refael, G.; Lee, P

    Chan, C.-K.; Lindner, N. H.; Refael, G.; Lee, P. A. Photocurrents in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 041104

    2017

  16. [24]

    Anisotropic chiral magnetic effect from tilted Weyl cones

    van der Wurff, E.; Stoof, H. Anisotropic chiral magnetic effect from tilted Weyl cones. Physical Review B 2017, 96, 121116

    2017

  17. [25]

    Tchoumakov, S.; Civelli, M.; Goerbig, M. O. Magnetic-field-induced relativistic properties in type- I and type- II Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 086402

    2016

  18. [26]

    Landau quantization in tilted Weyl semimetals with broken symmetry

    Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Smirnov, D.; Jiang, Z. Landau quantization in tilted Weyl semimetals with broken symmetry . Journal of Applied Physics 2021, 129, 105107

    2021

  19. [27]

    K.; Mohelsk \`y , I.; Le Mardel \'e , F.; Nov \'a k, J.; Novak, M.; Sankar, R.; Krupko, Y.; others Lorentz-Boost-Driven Magneto-Optics in a Dirac Nodal-Line Semimetal

    Wyzula, J.; Lu, X.; Santos-Cottin, D.; Mukherjee, D. K.; Mohelsk \`y , I.; Le Mardel \'e , F.; Nov \'a k, J.; Novak, M.; Sankar, R.; Krupko, Y.; others Lorentz-Boost-Driven Magneto-Optics in a Dirac Nodal-Line Semimetal. Advanced Science 2022, 9, 2105720

    2022

  20. [28]

    Nature communications 2017, 8, 13973

    Jiang, J.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Rajamathi, C.; Qi, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, C.; Peng, H.; Hwang, C.; others Signature of type-II Weyl semimetal phase in MoTe2. Nature communications 2017, 8, 13973

    2017

  21. [29]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 2015, 349, 613--617

    2015

  22. [30]

    Q.; Weng, H

    Lv, B. Q.; Weng, H. M.; Fu, B. B.; Wang, X. P.; Miao, H.; Ma, J.; Richard, P.; Huang, X. C.; Zhao, L. X.; Chen, G. F.; Fang, Z.; Dai, X.; Qian, T.; Ding, H. Experimental discovery of Weyl semimetal TaAs . Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 031013

    2015

  23. [31]

    Liu, Z. K. et al. Evolution of the Fermi surface of Weyl semimetals in the transition metal pnictide family. Nature Materials 2016, 15, 27--31

    2016

  24. [32]

    Direct observation of nonequivalent Fermi-arc states of opposite surfaces in the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetal NbP

    Souma, S.; Wang, Z.; Kotaka, H.; Sato, T.; Nakayama, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Kimizuka, H.; Takahashi, T.; Yamauchi, K.; Oguchi, T.; Segawa, K.; Ando, Y. Direct observation of nonequivalent Fermi-arc states of opposite surfaces in the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetal NbP. Phys. Rev. B...

    2016

  25. [33]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion state with Fermi arcs in niobium arsenide. Nature Physics 2015, 11, 748--754

    2015

  26. [34]

    Xu, S.-Y. et al. Experimental discovery of a topological Weyl semimetal state in TaP. Science Advances 2015, 1, e1501092

    2015

  27. [35]

    S.; Belopolski, I.; Chang, G.; Bian, G.; Alidoust, N.; Zheng, H.; Neupane, M.; Wang, B.; Bansil, A.; Hasan, M

    Lee, C.-C.; Xu, S.-Y.; Huang, S.-M.; Sanchez, D. S.; Belopolski, I.; Chang, G.; Bian, G.; Alidoust, N.; Zheng, H.; Neupane, M.; Wang, B.; Bansil, A.; Hasan, M. Z.; Lin, H. Fermi surface interconnectivity and topology in Weyl fermion semimetals TaAs, TaP, NbAs, and NbP. Phys. R...

    2015

  28. [36]

    Landau quantization in coupled Weyl points: A case study of semimetal NbP

    Jiang, Y.; Dun, Z.; Moon, S.; Zhou, H.; Koshino, M.; Smirnov, D.; Jiang, Z. Landau quantization in coupled Weyl points: A case study of semimetal NbP . Nano Letters 2018, 18, 7726--7731

    2018

  29. [37]

    Yuan, X. et al. Chiral Landau levels in Weyl semimetal NbAs with multiple topological carriers. Nature Communications 2018, 9, 1854

    2018

  30. [38]

    Physical review letters 2020, 124, 176402

    Polatkan, S.; Goerbig, M.; Wyzula, J.; Kemmler, R.; Maulana, L.; Piot, B.; Crassee, I.; Akrap, A.; Shekhar, C.; Felser, C.; others Magneto-optics of a Weyl semimetal beyond the conical band approximation: case study of TaP. Physical review letters 2020, 124, 176402

    2020

  31. [39]

    D.; Ronning, F.; Smirnov, D.; Ju, L.; Ramshaw, B

    Lu, Z.; Hollister, P.; Ozerov, M.; Moon, S.; Bauer, E. D.; Ronning, F.; Smirnov, D.; Ju, L.; Ramshaw, B. Weyl Fermion magneto-electrodynamics and ultralow field quantum limit in TaAs. Science Advances 2022, 8, eabj1076

    2022

  32. [40]

    Physical Review Materials 2022, 6, 054204

    Zhao, M.; Yan, Z.; Xie, X.; Yang, Y.; Leng, P.; Ozerov, M.; Yan, D.; Shi, Y.; Yang, J.; Xiu, F.; others Unconventional Landau level transitions in Weyl semimetal NbP. Physical Review Materials 2022, 6, 054204

    2022

  33. [41]

    Magnetic susceptibility in three-dimensional nodal semimetals

    Koshino, M.; Hizbullah, I. Magnetic susceptibility in three-dimensional nodal semimetals. Physical Review B 2016, 93, 045201

    2016

  34. [42]

    ohle, A.; H\

    Neubauer, D.; Yaresko, A.; Li, W.; L\"ohle, A.; H\"ubner, R.; Schilling, M. B.; Shekhar, C.; Felser, C.; Dressel, M.; Pronin, A. V. Optical conductivity of the Weyl semimetal NbP. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 195203

    2018

  35. [43]

    Cyclotron resonance of figure-of-eight orbits in a type- II Weyl semimetal

    Koshino, M. Cyclotron resonance of figure-of-eight orbits in a type- II Weyl semimetal. Physical Review B 2016, 94, 035202

    2016

  36. [44]

    Linear magnetoconductivity in an intrinsic topological Weyl semimetal

    Zhang, S.-B.; Lu, H.-Z.; Shen, S.-Q. Linear magnetoconductivity in an intrinsic topological Weyl semimetal. New Journal of Physics 2016, 18, 053039 mcitethebibliography NbP-Voigt_NL_v2.tex0000664000000000000000000006273414721237553013072 0ustar rootroot [journal=nalefd,manuscr...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.