Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 2 cited by

Exactly solvable conformal field theories

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The two-ingredient recipe for exact solvability in 2D CFT is Virasoro symmetry plus degenerate fields.

desk verdict A useful, honest review of the Virasoro bootstrap that is clear about what is solved and what is still conjecture in loop CFTs; the loop CFT pay-off is conditional on unproven spectra and the map-basis conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17262 v4 pith:NOWWH37E submitted 2024-11-26 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Sylvain Ribault This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords conformalbootstrapVirasoroalgebradegeneratefieldsLiouvilletheoryminimalmodelsloopCFTsO(n)modelPotts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a review with a thesis: in two dimensions, a conformal field theory is exactly solvable when it has two ingredients, the infinite-dimensional local conformal (Virasoro) algebra and at least one degenerate field. The paper shows how those two inputs constrain spectra through fusion rules, and correlation functions through shift equations that arise from crossing symmetry of degenerate four-point functions. If the thesis is correct, every correlation function of Liouville theory, generalized and A/D-series minimal models, and their limits is computable to arbitrary precision, and the same machinery opens a route to solving the loop CFTs that describe critical statistical models. The paper is explicit about where that route remains conjectural: the proposed loop-CFT spectra, and the claim that combinatorial maps form a basis of solutions of crossing symmetry.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the degenerate field $V^d_{\langle r,s\rangle}$, a Virasoro primary whose module carries a null vector, so that its operator product with any field contains only finitely many representations. Its fusion rules, for example $V^d_{\langle 2,1\rangle} V_P = V_{P+\beta/2}+V_{P-\beta/2}$, generate the discrete spectra of minimal models, and inserting a degenerate field into a four-point function converts crossing symmetry into a finite hypergeometric differential equation whose solutions are the conformal blocks. Comparing channels in those four-point functions produces shift equations for structure constants under momentum shifts by $\beta$ or $\beta^{-1}$, and the solutions are expressed with Barnes' double Gamma function $\Gamma_\beta$. For loop CFTs, the extended spectrum built from the single degenerate field $V^d_{\langle 1,2\rangle}$ packages Virasoro blocks into interchiral blocks, and the combinatorial map of a loop configuration labels the conjectured basis of crossing-symmetry solutions.

What would settle it

The decisive check is to count, at a fixed truncation level, the solutions of crossing symmetry for a loop-CFT four-point function whose channels admit two or more combinatorial maps: the basis conjecture predicts that the dimension of the solution space equals the number of maps. Finding a solution not labelled by any map, or a map that produces no solution, would falsify it. A second, independent check would be to look directly in the lattice-model spectrum of O(n), PSU(n) or Potts for a primary field, for instance the backbone field, that is absent from the proposed CFT spectra.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that exact solvability in two-dimensional CFT rests on exactly two ingredients: local conformal symmetry, embodied in the infinite-dimensional Virasoro algebra, and the existence of degenerate fields. Given those ingredients, the bootstrap determines the spectrum through fusion rules, and crossing symmetry of four-point functions that contain a degenerate field yields shift equations for three-point structure constants; solving these equations gives closed expressions in products of Barnes double Gamma functions. The scheme is carried through for Liouville theory, generalized and A/D-series minimal models, Runkel-Watts-type limits, and, conjecturally, for the loop CFTs $O(n)$, $PSU(n)$ and Potts. For the loop CFTs the paper proposes that correlation functions are organized by combinatorial maps, with each map conjecturally labelling one basis solution of crossing symmetry. It thus advances the programmatic claim that the remaining unsolved loop CFTs are solvable by the same two ingredients, with the missing steps isolated as explicit conjectures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the proposed loop-CFT spectra are complete and that every combinatorial map yields an independent solution of crossing symmetry; if an extra field such as the backbone field is missing from the spectra, or if the basis conjecture fails, the derived structure constants would not describe the lattice models.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In Liouville theory and in generalized and A/D-series minimal models, two- and three-point structure constants are fixed by the shift equations, so correlation functions on the sphere can be computed to arbitrary precision.
  • If the combinatorial-map basis conjecture holds, the same degenerate-field machinery determines four-point functions in the O(n), PSU(n) and Potts loop CFTs, bringing those statistical models into the exactly solvable class.
  • The limit relations among generalized minimal models, Liouville theory, Runkel-Watts-type theories and A/D-series minimal models become controlled statements about how degenerate momenta behave, explaining where analytic continuation of structure constants breaks down.
  • The numerical bootstrap with a recursive representation of Virasoro blocks gives a finite, cut-off-controlled way to count solutions of crossing symmetry, which is what makes the combinatorial-map basis conjecture checkable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the combinatorial-map basis holds, the space of crossing-symmetry solutions acquires an enumerative meaning, since counting maps becomes counting chord diagrams; this could connect loop CFTs to graph enumeration and random-matrix techniques.
  • Beyond the paper: the two-ingredient recipe suggests a practical solvability test for any candidate 2D CFT, namely to search its extended spectrum for a degenerate field; without one, the analytic bootstrap machinery described here would not even start.
  • Beyond the paper: the reported numerical pattern that structure constants in loop CFTs vanish exactly when the fractional part of the second Kac index is nonzero could be promoted to a sharp conjecture and tested at higher cut-off on many more four-point functions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a pedagogical review of the conformal bootstrap in two dimensions, organized around the thesis that exact solvability requires only the infinite-dimensional Virasoro algebra and the existence of degenerate fields. Chapters 1-3 present Virasoro representation theory, OPEs, degenerate fusion rules, BPZ equations, and shift equations, and then solve these for Liouville theory, generalized and A/D-series minimal models, Runkel-Watts-type theories, and, with significant caveats, loop CFTs. Chapter 4 develops numerical crossing-symmetry methods, including interchiral blocks and Zamolodchikov's recursion, and Chapter 5 relates loop-CFT correlation functions to statistical sums over loop ensembles via combinatorial maps. The manuscript is explicit about which statements are proven, which are imported from the literature, and which are conjectural; the principal conjectures are the polynomiality of normalized loop-CFT structure constants and the combinatorial-map basis conjecture, Eq. (5.16).

Significance. The review is valuable: it gives a single, coherent derivation of structure constants for the main Virasoro CFTs with no extended chiral symmetry, including explicit double-Gamma-function formulas and a clear account of the analytic and numerical bootstrap. The numerical section is unusually concrete, with convergence diagnostics shrinking from about 1e-17 to 1e-45 as the cutoff increases from 30 to 70 (Table 4.58), and reference to reproducible code. The paper is honest about its limitations: the Potts spectrum is admitted to lack a simple derivation in the formalism (Section 2.4.3), the statistical-model/CFT dictionary is admitted to be difficult to derive (Section 5.2), and the central combinatorial-map basis conjecture (5.16) is clearly labeled as a conjecture. These strengths make the paper a useful reference and a good starting point for the loop-CFT program. The significance of the loop-CFT part is conditional: if (5.16) and the assumed spectra (2.69)-(2.71) are correct, the numerical D-coefficients of Sections 4.4 and 5.4 are genuine critical-limit data; if not, they are only crossing-symmetric functions with assumed spectra.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Section 5.2.2, Eq. (5.16)] The abstract groups loop CFTs under 'known exactly solvable CFTs', while the body repeatedly states that these theories are 'not solved but are believed to be solvable' and relegates the key step (5.16) to a conjecture. Please adjust the abstract and introduction so that the conditional status of loop-CFT solvability is stated there, not only in later sections.
  2. [Section 5.2.2] The text refers to 'Figure (5.3)' in the discussion of topological versus combinatorial defects, but I could not locate that figure in the manuscript; please add the figure or remove the reference.
  3. [Throughout] Numerous small typographical and grammatical errors should be corrected, for example 'singe-valuedness' in the Introduction, 'subtelty' in Section 5.2.2, and 'leaved' in Section 2.2.4.
  4. [Section 4.4.3, Table 4.58] The text says the table displays 'about 15 of the 24 or 56 digits', but the printed values have about 20 digits; please make the displayed precision explicit and clarify how the underlined digits are indicated in the final typeset version.
  5. [Section 4.4.4] The procedure for counting solutions by removing primary fields is heuristic and relies on inspecting relative deviations; a brief statement about the known failure modes of this method (for example, when truncated singular values are small for reasons unrelated to the exact solution space) would improve the exposition.
  6. [Section 4.2.1] The proposed interchiral algebra is explicitly tentative, but the numerical use of interchiral blocks in Section 4.4.1 relies on shift equations rather than on a fully constructed algebra; a sentence clarifying that the blocks are defined independently of the tentative algebraic construction would prevent potential confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Virasoro-plus-degenerate-field derivation is self-contained, and the loop-CFT spectra and combinatorial-map basis are explicitly assumed rather than being presented as independent predictions.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain and found no step in which a prediction is equivalent to its input by construction or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The Virasoro machinery, degenerate-field fusion rules, BPZ equations, and shift equations are derived from the stated axioms (local conformal symmetry, OPE associativity, single-valuedness, and existence of degenerate fields), and the resulting structure constants are checked against independent external results, e.g. the Ising fusion rules (2.35), the DOZZ formula (3.40), and the Potts/AMM/DMM inclusions (2.74). The loop-CFT spectra (2.69)-(2.71) are indeed inputs rather than consequences of the Virasoro-plus-degenerate-field assumptions, but the paper says so openly: the Potts spectrum 'has no simple explanation in our formalism' (Section 2.4.3), and the statistical-model/CFT dictionary 'is not easy to derive' (Section 5.2). Likewise, the central combinatorial-map basis conjecture (5.16) is explicitly labelled 'We conjecture' and is attributed to prior work as a conjecture, not as an external theorem. This is an honest conditional assumption, and its failure would be a correctness risk, not a circularity. The paper also contains self-citations (e.g. [41], [51], [52]), but they are used for algebraic packaging, numerical methods, or tentative constructions whose conjectural status is stated; they do not smuggle in the conclusion as a premise. I therefore find no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard of quoting a specific reduction of the derivation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper fits no parameters to data; all numbers (central charge, loop weights) are inputs from the cited literature or definitions of the statistical ensembles. The two listed free parameters are input weights of the loop model, chosen per model rather than fitted. The axioms it relies on are standard CFT axiomatics (OPE existence, single-valuedness, bounded L0) plus three assumptions specific to this paper's program: surjectivity of degenerate OPEs (§2.1.3), diagonal degenerate fusion (§3.1.3), and genericity of β² with extension to rational values by limits. The invented entities, the interchiral algebra and the combinatorial defect, are explicitly tentative and carry the load of the loop CFT conjectures (Eq. 4.3, §5.2.2).

free parameters (2)
  • closed loop class weights {n, w_i, w_s, w_t, w_u}
    Weights of the 8 combinatorially inequivalent classes of closed loops in the loop-model correlation functions (Eq. 5.4 and Fig. 5.4). They are parameters of the statistical ensemble, chosen per model (O(n), PSU(n), Potts), not fitted to data in this paper. The CFT claim is that solutions depend on them only via w(P)=2cos(2πβP) (Eq. 3.61).
  • puncture phase weight parameter s with rs ∈ Z
    The angular weight exp(i s Σ_k θ_k) at legged punctures (Eq. 5.8). The constraint rs ∈ Z (Eq. 5.10) is required by rotation invariance, and (r,s) then label the non-diagonal field V(r,s). This is bookkeeping, not a fitted value.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Existence of convergent operator product expansions on the sphere (the fundamental bootstrap axiom)
    Stated in §1.2.2: 'The fundamental axiom of conformal field theory, which underlies the conformal bootstrap approach, is the existence of OPEs.' All crossing symmetry equations (1.105) rest on it.
  • domain assumption Single-valuedness and mutual locality of correlation functions
    §1.3.2: 'We assume that correlation functions are single-valued on the Riemann sphere.' This fixes the modulus-squared chiral factorization (1.86-1.88) and constrains spins to integers (1.91).
  • domain assumption L0 spectra bounded from below in every indecomposable representation
    §1.1.2: 'We will always assume that this condition holds.' Justifies convergence of OPEs (§1.2.3).
  • domain assumption Degenerate fields exist with vanishing null vectors (V⟨2,1⟩ and V⟨1,2⟩ at minimum)
    The abstract makes this one of the two pillars of exact solvability; §2.1.3 and §§3.1-3.2 use it to derive fusion rules and shift equations.
  • ad hoc to paper Surjectivity of degenerate OPEs: the OPE of 2 degenerate fields contains all fusion-allowed fields
    §2.1.3: 'We assume that the OPE of 2 degenerate fields yields all the degenerate fields that are allowed by the fusion rules.' This drives the 7-set classification (2.6) and the spectrum table (2.75). The author cautions the assumptions are 'not unique or inevitable'.
  • ad hoc to paper Diagonal action of degenerate fusion on the fields V1, V2, V3 in 4-point functions
    §3.1.3: 'We assume that fusion with V⟨2,1⟩ acts diagonally on V1, V2, V3... This assumption is fulfilled by diagonal fields, but also by non-diagonal fields' of the stated momentum type; it underlies Eqs. (3.15)-(3.20).
  • ad hoc to paper Generic values β² ∉ Q for the derivations, with extension to rational β² by limits
    §2.1.3 assumes β² ∉ Q to derive the OPEs (2.10), then asserts validity for any central charge; §4.3.3 says Zamolodchikov's recursion 'is only valid if β² ∉ Q'. Rational cases (minimal models) are reached by limits, which the paper flags as subtle in §2.2.4.
invented entities (2)
  • Interchiral algebra generated by T, T̄ and D± (shifting momentum by ±β⁻¹) independent evidence
    purpose: Package the shift equations from the degenerate field V⟨1,2⟩ into a symmetry, so that interchiral blocks (4.12) reduce the number of unknowns in the numerical bootstrap and organize the loop CFT spectra (Eqs. 4.3a-4.3d).
    The construction in §4.2.1 is labeled tentative ('surely not the final word on the subject'), with four explicit remaining issues. Its falsifiable handle is the interchiral block decomposition used in the numerical crossing symmetry solutions of §4.4.3, whose convergence data (Table 4.58) provide indirect evidence but depend on unreleased code.
  • Combinatorial defect with weight w_s
    purpose: Explain why loop CFT 4-point functions can depend on channel loop weights w_s even though the fields V(ri,si) do not carry that data (§5.2.2).
    Invoked to resolve a 'potential puzzle' in the map-basis correspondence. In the O(n) CFT the paper notes one map-based solution is forbidden by degenerate fusion rules ([32]), so the defect's CFT incarnation is conjectural and no external observable is specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exactly solvable conformal field theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOWWH37E

@misc{pith2026241117262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exactly solvable conformal field theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOWWH37E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17262}
}
abstract

We review 2d CFT in the bootstrap approach, and sketch the known exactly solvable CFTs with no extended chiral symmetry: Liouville theory, (generalized) minimal models, limits thereof, and loop CFTs, including the $O(n)$, Potts and $PSU(n)$ CFTs. Exact solvability relies on local conformal symmetry, and on the existence of degenerate fields. We show how these assumptions constrain the spectrum and correlation functions. We discuss how crossing symmetry equations can be solved analytically and/or numerically, leading to analytic expressions for structure constants in terms of the double Gamma function. In the case of loop CFTs, we sketch the corresponding statistical models, and derive the relation between statistical and CFT variables. We review the resulting combinatorial description of correlation functions, and discuss what remains to be done for solving the CFTs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Runkel-Watts string

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Runkel-Watts string is a solvable family of two-dimensional string theories whose all-genus amplitudes are generated by SU(2) Yang-Mills TQFT data combined with VMS quantum volumes, and it has a dual matrix-integr...

  2. Anyon Condensation in Virasoro TQFT: Wormhole Factorization

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Condensing a diagonal anyon in Virasoro TQFT factorizes wormhole partition functions and produces Liouville CFT on the two boundary surfaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, D. S´ en´ echal (1997 book) Conformal field theory (4, 19, 26, 44)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, A. Vichi (2018 review) [arXiv:1805.04405] The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, an d Applications (4)

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin (2018) [arXiv:1706.07813] Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks (4)

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Antunes, C

    A. Antunes, C. Behan (2024) [arXiv:2412.21107] Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from perm utation symmetry (4)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin (2019) [arXiv:1809.05111] Harmonic Analysis and Mean Field Theory (4)

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Trevisani (2024) [arXiv:2405.00771] The Parisi-Sourlas Uplift and Infinitely Many Solvable 4d CF Ts (4)

    E. Trevisani (2024) [arXiv:2405.00771] The Parisi-Sourlas Uplift and Infinitely Many Solvable 4d CF Ts (4)

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, G. Korchemsky (2019) [arXiv:1808.02688] Exact Correlation Functions in Conformal Fishnet Theory (5)

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Kravchuk, D

    P. Kravchuk, D. Mazac, S. Pal (2021) [arXiv:2111.12716] Automorphic Spectra and the Conformal Bootstrap (5)

    arXiv 2021

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Ribault (2014 review) [arXiv:1406.4290] Conformal field theory on the plane (5, 6, 44, 49, 50, 52, 59)

    S. Ribault (2014 review) [arXiv:1406.4290] Conformal field theory on the plane (5, 6, 44, 49, 50, 52, 59)

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Jorge, A

    C. Jorge, A. Chardac, A. Poncet, D. Bartolo (2023) [arXiv:2305.06078] Active hydraulics laws from frustration principles (5)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Godet (2024) [arXiv:2405.09833] Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics (5)

    V. Godet (2024) [arXiv:2405.09833] Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics (5)

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann, V. A. Rodriguez (2024) [arXiv:2409.17246] The complex Liouville string (5)

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Di Francesco, H

    P. Di Francesco, H. Saleur, J.-B. Zuber (1987) Relations between the Coulomb gas picture and conformal inv ariance of two- dimensional critical models (6, 26)

    1987

  6. [14]

    Ribault (2016 review) [arXiv:1609.09523] Minimal lectures on two-dimensional conformal field theory (6)

    S. Ribault (2016 review) [arXiv:1609.09523] Minimal lectures on two-dimensional conformal field theory (6)

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ribault, et al (2025 Wiki course) Conformal field theory in two dimensions (6)

    S. Ribault, et al (2025 Wiki course) Conformal field theory in two dimensions (6)

    2025

  8. [16]

    G. M. T. Watts (2024) [arXiv:2412.07505] Explicit expressions for Virasoro singular vectors (10)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    V. A. Fateev, A. V. Litvinov (2007) [arXiv:arXiv:0709.3806 [hep-th]] Correlation functions in conformal Toda field theory I (12)

    2007 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Fortin, L

    J.-F. Fortin, L. Quintavalle, W. Skiba (2024) [arXiv:2409.12224] The Virasoro Completeness Relation and Inverse Shapovalov Form (13) 90

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. R. Gaberdiel (2000 review) [arXiv:hep-th/9910156] An Introduction to conformal field theory (17)

    2000 arXiv

  12. [20]

    E. M. Brehm, I. Runkel (2024) [arXiv:2410.19938] Lattice models from CFT on surfaces with holes II: Cloaking b oundary conditions and loop models (21)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Nivesvivat, S

    R. Nivesvivat, S. Ribault (2020) [arXiv:2007.04190] Logarithmic CFT at generic central charge: from Liouville t heory to the Q-state Potts model (23, 41, 57, 74, 83)

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, A. B. Zamolodchikov (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9506136] Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville fi eld theory (26, 52, 57)

    1996 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ribault, R

    S. Ribault, R. Santachiara (2015) [arXiv:1503.02067] Liouville theory with a central charge less than one (26, 36, 57, 69)

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Belavin, S

    A. Belavin, S. Parkhomenko (2024) [arXiv:2406.15144] Conformal bootstrap and Heterotic string Gepner models (26)

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Ribault (2018) [arXiv:1809.03722] On 2d CFTs that interpolate between minimal models (30, 44, 82)

    S. Ribault (2018) [arXiv:1809.03722] On 2d CFTs that interpolate between minimal models (30, 44, 82)

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Runkel, G

    I. Runkel, G. M. T. Watts (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0107118] A non-rational CFT with c = 1 as a limit of minimal models (35)

    2001 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Schomerus (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0306026] Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory (36)

    V. Schomerus (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0306026] Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory (36)

    2003 arXiv

  20. [28]

    McElgin (2008) [arXiv:0706.0365] Notes on Liouville Theory at c ≤ 1 ( 36)

    W. McElgin (2008) [arXiv:0706.0365] Notes on Liouville Theory at c ≤ 1 ( 36)

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Runkel, G

    I. Runkel, G. M. T. Watts (2020) [arXiv:2001.05055] Fermionic CFTs and classifying algebras (37)

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Migliaccio, S

    S. Migliaccio, S. Ribault (2017) [arXiv:1711.08916] The analytic bootstrap equations of non-diagonal two-dime nsional CFT (39)

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ribault (2020) [arXiv:1909.10784] The non-rational limit of D-series minimal models (39, 53, 57)

    S. Ribault (2020) [arXiv:1909.10784] The non-rational limit of D-series minimal models (39, 53, 57)

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Grans-Samuelsson, R

    L. Grans-Samuelsson, R. Nivesvivat, J. L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault, H . Saleur (2022) [arXiv:2111.01106] Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensi onal O(n) model ( 41, 57, 79, 83)

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    D. J. Binder, S. Rychkov (2019) [arXiv:1911.07895] Deligne categories in lattice models and quantum field theor y, or making sense of O(N) symmetry with non-integer N (41)

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault, H. Saleur (2023) [arXiv:2208.14298] Spaces of states of the two-dimensional O(n) and Potts models (41, 88)

    2023

  27. [35]

    P. Roux, J. L. Jacobsen, S. Ribault, H. Saleur (2024) [arXiv:2404.01935] Critical spin chains and loop models with P SU (n) symmetry (41) 91

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Nolin, W

    P. Nolin, W. Qian, X. Sun, Z. Zhuang (2023) [arXiv:2309.05050] Backbone exponent for two-dimensional percolation (43)

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Nivesvivat, S

    R. Nivesvivat, S. Ribault (2025) [arXiv:2502.14295] Fusion rules and structure constants of E-series minimal mo dels (44)

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    P. A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, J.-B. Zuber (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0607232] Logarithmic minimal models (44)

    2006 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Nemkov, S

    N. Nemkov, S. Ribault (2021) [arXiv:2106.15132] Analytic conformal bootstrap and Virasoro primary fields in the Ashkin-Teller model (44)

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505063] On the three-point function in minimal Liouville gravity (51)

    2005 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Nivesvivat, S

    R. Nivesvivat, S. Ribault, J. L. Jacobsen (2023) [arXiv:2311.17558] Critical loop models are exactly solvable (55, 57, 68, 84)

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    V. S. Dotsenko, V. A. Fateev (1985) Four Point Correlation Functions and the Operator Algebra i n the Two-Dimensional Conformal Invariant Theories with the Central Charge c < 1 (56)

    1985

  35. [43]

    Teschner (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0303150] A lecture on the Liouville vertex operators (56)

    J. Teschner (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0303150] A lecture on the Liouville vertex operators (56)

    2004 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Guillarmou, A

    C. Guillarmou, A. Kupiainen, R. Rhodes, V. Vargas (2020) [arXiv:2005.11530] Conformal bootstrap in Liouville Theory (56)

    2020 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius, M. Preti (2022) [arXiv:2203.09556] Bootstrability in defect CFT: integrated correlators and s harper bounds (57)

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ribault (2022) [arXiv:2209.09706] Diagonal fields in critical loop models (57, 58, 79, 85)

    S. Ribault (2022) [arXiv:2209.09706] Diagonal fields in critical loop models (57, 58, 79, 85)

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Picco, S

    M. Picco, S. Ribault, R. Santachiara (2016) [arXiv:1607.07224] A conformal bootstrap approach to critical percolation in t wo dimensions (57)

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Picco, S

    M. Picco, S. Ribault, R. Santachiara (2019) [arXiv:1906.02566] On four-point connectivities in the critical 2d Potts model (57)

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Y. He, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur (2020) [arXiv:2005.07258] Geometrical four-point functions in the two-dimensional c ritical Q-state Potts model: The interchiral conformal bootstrap (57)

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Nivesvivat (2022) [arXiv:2205.09349] Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensi onal Q-state Potts model (57, 79)

    R. Nivesvivat (2022) [arXiv:2205.09349] Global symmetry and conformal bootstrap in the two-dimensi onal Q-state Potts model (57, 79)

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Grans-Samuelsson, J

    L. Grans-Samuelsson, J. L. Jacobsen, R. Nivesvivat, S. Ribault, H . Saleur (2023) [arXiv:2302.08168] From combinatorial maps to correlation functions in loop mo dels ( 57, 73, 75, 79, 88)

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. M. Gainutdinov, N. Read, H. Saleur (2016) [arXiv:1207.6334] Associative algebraic approach to logarithmic CFT in the bu lk: the continuum limit of the gl(1|1) periodic spin chain, Howe duality and the interchiral algeb ra (58) 92

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov (1987) Conformal symmetry in two-dimensional space: Recursion re presentation of confor- mal block (61, 66)

    1987

  46. [54]

    M. Cho, S. Collier, X. Yin (2017) [arXiv:1703.09805] Recursive Representations of Arbitrary Virasoro Conforma l Blocks (61)

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Lin, S.-H

    Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, D. Simmons-Duffin, Y. Wang, X. Yin (2017) [arXiv:1511.04065] N = 4 superconformal bootstrap of the K3 CFT ( 64)

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Stocco (2022) [arXiv:2209.08653] The torus one-point block of 2d CFT and null vectors in ˆsl2 (66)

    D. Stocco (2022) [arXiv:2209.08653] The torus one-point block of 2d CFT and null vectors in ˆsl2 (66)

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    K. B. Alkalaev, P. E. Litvinov (2024) [arXiv:2407.12986] A note on the large- c conformal block asymptotics and α-heavy operators (66)

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Be¸ sken, S

    M. Be¸ sken, S. Datta, P. Kraus (2020) [arXiv:1910.04169] Semi-classical Virasoro blocks: proof of exponentiation (67)

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin, A. Zhiboedov (2017) [arXiv:1509.03612] Looking for a bulk point (67)

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ribault, R

    S. Ribault, R. Nivesvivat, et al (2023 code) Bootstrap Virasoro 6.0: Bootstrapping two-dimensional CFTs with Vir asoro symme- try (71)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Gorbenko, S

    V. Gorbenko, S. Rychkov, B. Zan (2018) [arXiv:1808.04380] Walking, Weak first-order transitions, and Complex CFTs II. Two-dimensional Potts model at Q > 4 ( 77)

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. L. Cardy (1996 book) Scaling and renormalization in statistical physics (80)

    1996

  55. [63]

    B¨ ohm, J

    J. B¨ ohm, J. L. Jacobsen, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang (2022) [arXiv:2202.02986] Geometric algebra and algebraic geometry of loop and Potts m odels (81)

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Gorbenko, B

    V. Gorbenko, B. Zan (2020) [arXiv:2005.07708] Two-dimensional O(n) models and logarithmic CFTs (81)

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur (2023) [arXiv:2305.05746] Non-invertible symmetries and RG flows in the two-dimension al O(n) loop model (81)

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Ikhlef, J

    Y. Ikhlef, J. L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur (2016) [arXiv:1509.03538] Three-Point Functions in c ≤ 1 Liouville Theory and Conformal Loop Ensembles (85)

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Ikhlef, A

    Y. Ikhlef, A. Morin-Duchesne (2023) [arXiv:2312.14837] Fusion of irreducible modules in the periodic Temperley–Li eb algebra (87)

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Y. He, H. Saleur (2022) [arXiv:2109.05050] A note on the identity module in c = 0 CFTs (87) 93 Index abelian affine Lie algebra ˆu1, 59 affine-primary state, 59 Ashkin–Teller model, 44 block —residue, 62 conformal—, 25 interchiral—, 60 Virasoro—, 24 BPZ equation, 45 central charge...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.