REVIEW 2 cited by
AutoElicit: Using Large Language Models for Expert Prior Elicitation in Predictive Modelling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) acquire a breadth of information across various domains. However, their computational complexity, cost, and lack of transparency often hinder their direct application for predictive tasks where privacy and interpretability are paramount. In fields such as healthcare, biology, and finance, specialised and interpretable linear models still hold considerable value. In such domains, labelled data may be scarce or expensive to obtain. Well-specified prior distributions over model parameters can reduce the sample complexity of learning through Bayesian inference; however, eliciting expert priors can be time-consuming. We therefore introduce AutoElicit to extract knowledge from LLMs and construct priors for predictive models. We show these priors are informative and can be refined using natural language. We perform a careful study contrasting AutoElicit with in-context learning and demonstrate how to perform model selection between the two methods. We find that AutoElicit yields priors that can substantially reduce error over uninformative priors, using fewer labels, and consistently outperform in-context learning. We show that AutoElicit saves over 6 months of labelling effort when building a new predictive model for urinary tract infections from sensor recordings of people living with dementia.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exploiting LLMs for Automatic Hypothesis Assessment via a Logit-Based Calibrated Prior
A logit-based method converts an LLM's numeric guesses into a calibrated prior over Pearson correlations and ranks expert-flagged hypotheses better than ranking by magnitude or by a fine-tuned RoBERTa classifier.
-
Using Large Language Models to Suggest Informative Prior Distributions in Bayesian Statistics
LLMs suggested directionally correct but poorly calibrated Bayesian priors, with Claude's weak priors ranking best on KL divergence from the data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.