Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 131 references

Non-equilibrium coexistence between a fluid and a hotter or colder crystal of granular hard disks

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A denser granular crystal can be hotter than its coexisting liquid in a model of dissipative hard disks driven by a Langevin bath, because the crystal's collision frequency is lower.

desk verdict A hot solid coexisting with a cold liquid in a monodisperse granular hard-disk model is a real, simulation-supported result; the parameter-free theory is elegant but rests on Enskog assumptions that are least secure in the solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17531 v2 pith:4HOCGVH2 submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

R. Maire , A. Plati , F. Smallenburg , G. Foffi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords granularmatterdissipativeharddisksnon-equilibriumphasecoexistencetemperaturekinetictheoryEnskogcollisionfrequencyliquid-solidtransitionLangevinbath
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that, in a simple two-dimensional model of granular hard disks driven by a Langevin bath, a crystal can coexist with a liquid even though the crystal is denser and all collisions are dissipative. The hot-phase ordering is set by collision frequency rather than density: at coexistence the solid's Enskog collision rate $\omega=8\phi g^+\sqrt{T/\pi m}/\sigma$ is lower than the liquid's, so the solid dissipates less and runs hotter. The authors extend kinetic theory, using measured contact values $g^+$, to predict granular temperatures across the coexistence region, including inside the solid phase, and obtain a dimensionless criterion $\Lambda>1$ for which the solid is necessarily hotter. In the companion $\Delta+\gamma$ model, where collisions inject rather than only remove energy, the same reasoning gives a colder solid, matching simulations. This changes the usual expectation that the denser coexisting phase must be the colder one and identifies collisional dynamics as the controlling factor.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Enskog's collision frequency $\omega(T,\phi g^+)=8\phi g^+\sqrt{T/\pi m}/\sigma$, combined with the steady-state energy balance $(\omega/2)[m\Delta^2+\alpha\Delta\sqrt{\pi m T}-(1-\alpha^2)T]-2\gamma(T-T_b)=0$. Because the temperature equation depends on density only through $\phi g^+$, the paper isolates $\phi g^+\equiv G(T)$, substitutes $G(T)$ into the virial pressure, and writes the pressure as $p=\phi\,\tilde p(T,G(T))$, linear in $\phi$. Mechanical equilibrium $p_s=p_l$ then yields $\tilde p(T_s)<\tilde p(T_l)$ whenever $\phi_s>\phi_l$, and the monotonicity of $\tilde p$ fixes which phase is hotter. For the GLM, $\tilde p_{\mathrm{GLM}}(\tilde T)=T_b\tilde T[1+\Lambda(1-\tilde T)\tilde T^{-3/2}]$; for $\Lambda>1$ this function decreases over the physical interval $\tilde T<1$, yielding $T_s>T_l$. The derivation assumes molecular chaos and Gaussian velocity statistics, which are used to obtain Enskog's $\omega$ and the collisional averages.

What would settle it

Run event-driven GLM simulations at coexistence (for instance $\alpha=0.99$, $T_b/[m(\sigma\gamma)^2]=0.125$) and count collisions per particle separately in the solid and liquid domains. If the hotter solid does not show a lower collision frequency than the colder liquid, the mechanism and the $\phi g^+$ elimination fail; equally, measuring local pressures and temperatures should either satisfy or violate $\tilde p(T_s)<\tilde p(T_l)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the level of the granular Langevin model (GLM), the central claim is that liquid-solid coexistence with $T_s>T_l$ occurs near the equilibrium liquid-hexatic transition even though the only energy input is the bath and collisions purely dissipate energy. The sign of the temperature difference follows from pressure balance: equal hard-disk pressures force $\phi_s g_s^+<\phi_l g_l^+$, and because $\omega\propto\phi g^+$, the denser phase has the smaller collision frequency and therefore the smaller dissipation rate. Eliminating $\phi g^+$ from the steady-state energy balance turns coexistence into the inequality $\tilde p(T_s)<\tilde p(T_l)$; for the GLM, $\tilde p$ is decreasing on the physical temperature interval whenever $\Lambda>1$, which forces $T_s>T_l$. The same construction makes $\tilde p$ increasing for the $\Delta+\gamma$ model, forcing $T_s<T_l$ throughout its physical parameter range. Event-driven molecular-dynamics simulations with up to about $10^5$ particles confirm both orderings, with phase-temperature differences of order $0.1$--$0.3\%$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that collisions are uncorrelated (molecular chaos) and that particle velocities are nearly Gaussian even inside the crystal, so the Enskog collision-frequency formula and the elimination of $\phi g^+$ through $G(T)$ remain valid in the solid phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the GLM with $\Lambda>1$, the hotter-solid ordering follows from the theory without an equation of state or a measured $g^+$, so it can be tested purely through macroscopic parameters $\alpha$, $\gamma$, and $T_b$.
  • Kinetic-theory temperatures agree with measured granular temperatures from dilute conditions through the solid phase, so coexistence temperatures can be predicted rather than extracted from histograms.
  • In the $\Delta+\gamma$ model the solid is always colder for physical parameters, showing that whether the dense phase is hotter or colder depends on where collisions inject or remove energy.
  • In the GLM, decreasing $\Lambda$ below 1 removes the first-order coexistence: the pressure loop that marks it disappears, while an energy loop survives at the transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental check would be to track per-particle collision rates separately in ordered and disordered regions of a quasi-2D vibrated monolayer; the mechanism predicts that the hotter phase is the one with fewer collisions, not the less dense one.
  • Because the sign of the temperature difference is controlled by whether $\tilde p$ is increasing or decreasing, any other dissipative model with the same pressure-versus-temperature structure but a different collision-frequency law could show a different ordering; the paper's construction gives a template for classifying such cases.
  • For multicomponent or quasicrystalline granular solids, structurally forbidden collisions in the ordered phase suppress the collision frequency further, so the hot-solid effect should be stronger than the monodisperse difference of about 0.1%--0.3%.
  • The near-equilibrium assumption limits the effect to small temperature differences; as dissipation grows, the first-order coexistence disappears, so an experimental search for a hot solid should stay close to the equilibrium melting point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports event-driven molecular dynamics simulations of two driven granular hard-disk models, the Delta+gamma model and the granular Langevin model (GLM), in the liquid-solid coexistence region. For the Delta+gamma model the coexisting solid is colder than the liquid, whereas for the GLM, in which collisions are purely dissipative, the authors observe the opposite: a hotter solid coexisting with a colder liquid. The hotter-solid effect is attributed to a lower collision frequency in the solid relative to the liquid at coexistence. The paper develops a kinetic theory based on molecular chaos, Gaussian velocity distributions, and the Enskog collision-frequency relation, and derives a criterion, Eq. (17), that determines the relative phase temperatures from the function G(T) without fitting parameters. For the GLM the theory predicts a hotter solid whenever the dimensionless parameter Lambda > 1, and a colder solid in the Delta+gamma model. The theoretical temperatures are compared with simulation in Fig. 2 using measured values of g+.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper provides a direct counterexample to the common expectation that the denser coexisting phase must be the colder one in dissipative granular systems. The numerical observation is supported by Mayer-Wood loops, local density and temperature profiles, and averages over many realizations, which is a genuine strength. The kinetic-theory route is elegant: no parameters are fitted, and the final criterion is expressed in terms of a single dimensionless parameter. The claim that kinetic theory can be extended to the solid phase, and the associated prediction Lambda > 1 for a hotter solid, are conceptually novel and would be useful for future experiments. The main weakness is that the theoretical criterion relies on the Enskog collision-frequency relation inside the solid, an assumption that the authors themselves flag as fragile; the manuscript needs to either validate this relation in the coexisting solid or clearly restate the theoretical claim as conditional on it.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.B-III.C, Eqs. (8), (13), (19)] The parameter-free prediction for the GLM rests on substituting Eq. (8), omega = 8 phi g+ sqrt(T/pi m)/sigma, into the steady-state balance Eq. (11) to obtain G(T) in Eq. (13). If Eq. (8) fails inside the solid, then Eq. (19) for p-tilde and the conclusion T_s > T_l for Lambda > 1 do not follow. Figure 2 tests Eq. (11) combined with Eq. (8) using measured g+ in homogeneous systems, but it does not separately verify Eq. (8) in the coexisting solid slab of Fig. 1(f). Since the observed temperature difference is only 0.1-0.3%, and since Sec. IV concedes that molecular chaos and Gaussian velocity distributions 'can easily break down... particularly in the solid phase,' I ask for a direct test of Eq. (8) inside the coexisting solid, for example by measuring the collision frequency and g+ in the same solid region, or, failing that, for a clear statement that the Lambda > 1 criterion is a theoretical conjecture rather than a fully validated prediction.
  2. [Appendix E, Eq. (E3)-Eq. (E7)] The proof that p-tilde is decreasing for all physical T < T_b when Lambda > 1 relies on the assertion that the root T* of Eq. (E4) is monotonically increasing in Lambda. The manuscript provides only an asymptotic expansion around Lambda = 1, Eq. (E6), and a representative figure. Because the conclusion T_s > T_l for all Lambda > 1 depends on this monotonicity, a short rigorous argument or a numerical plot of T*(Lambda) over the full range Lambda > 1 should be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (15)-(16)] Equation (15) states p = phi p-tilde, while Eq. (16) defines p-tilde = sigma^2 pi p / (4 phi). These two relations are inconsistent by the constant factor 4/(pi sigma^2); the factor cancels in the inequality Eq. (17), but the equations should be corrected for clarity.
  2. [Eq. (E6)] The error term in the expansion of T* around Lambda = 1 is written as O((Lambda - 2)^3); it should be O((Lambda - 1)^3).
  3. [Fig. 1] The temperature difference between the two phases is only about 0.1-0.3%, but the profiles in panels (c) and (f) are shown without error bars. Given that the central qualitative claim rests on the sign of this small difference, statistical uncertainties should be reported, at least for the GLM profiles.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption and Sec. II.B] The labels 'Energy' in panels (b) and (e) are used interchangeably with granular temperature; please use one consistent term throughout the figures and text.
  5. [Sec. II.A] The definition of the reference temperature T_o appears only in the caption of Fig. 1; since it is used to normalize the Delta+gamma data, it would be clearer to define it in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coexistence-temperature prediction is derived from stated kinetic-theory assumptions, with g+ eliminated rather than fitted, and the acknowledged solid-phase caveat is a correctness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The steady-state temperature balance (Eq. 11) and virial pressure (Eq. 10) are derived from the collision rule under stated molecular-chaos and Gaussian-velocity assumptions (Appendices A and C), and no parameter is fitted to the coexisting-phase temperature difference. The key elimination step (Eq. 13) defines G(T) by inserting the Enskog collision-frequency relation (Eq. 8) into Eq. (11), so the final coexistence criterion Eq. (17) depends only on model parameters (alpha, gamma, Delta, Tb) and the structural input that the solid is denser (phi_s > phi_l). Figure 2 uses measured g+ only as a post-hoc consistency check of Eq. (11); g+ is not an input to Eq. (17), so this is not a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The Sec. IV caveat that molecular chaos and Gaussianity 'can easily break down ... particularly in the solid phase' is an explicitly acknowledged limitation and a correctness risk, not a circularity, because the prediction is derived from those assumptions rather than from the target temperature ordering. Self-citations (Refs. 72, 73, 86) provide context, prior model definitions, and supporting examples, but they are not load-bearing proofs of the new monodisperse result. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the kinetic-theory assumptions listed below. No parameters are fitted to the data, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Molecular chaos: the two-particle velocity distribution factorizes as f^(2)(vi,vj,σij) ≃ g+ f(vi) f(vj) in both liquid and solid phases.
    Invoked in Appendix C (Eq. C4) to derive the collision frequency and the temperature balance; known to break down in dense or solid phases, acknowledged by the authors.
  • domain assumption Velocity distribution is Gaussian in both phases.
    Used throughout the kinetic theory (Appendix C, Eq. C5) to compute collisional averages; the paper notes this can easily break down, particularly in the solid.
  • domain assumption Enskog collision frequency ω = 8ϕg+ sqrt(T/(πm))/σ holds at all densities up to the solid.
    Eq. (8) and (C6); this relation is the conduit through which density (via ϕg+) sets the temperature, and it underpins the elimination of ϕg+ in Eq. (13).
  • domain assumption Mechanical equilibrium with flat interfaces: p_s = p_l with no Laplace-pressure or interfacial-stress corrections.
    Eq. (12) and the discussion in Sec. III.B; the authors explicitly assume flat interfaces and neglect interfacial stresses that could affect each phase's temperature.
  • domain assumption Steady-state energy balance for each phase: (ω/2)(mΔ² + αΔ√(πmT) − (1−α²)T) − 2γ(T−T_b) = 0.
    Eq. (11), derived in Appendix C under the molecular-chaos and Gaussian assumptions; this equation connects temperature to ϕg+ and is central to the derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-equilibrium coexistence between a fluid and a hotter or colder crystal of granular hard disks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4HOCGVH2

@misc{pith2026241117531,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-equilibrium coexistence between a fluid and a hotter or colder crystal of granular hard disks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4HOCGVH2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17531}
}
read the original abstract

Non-equilibrium phase coexistence is commonly observed in both biological and artificial systems, yet understanding it remains a significant challenge. Unlike equilibrium systems, where free energy provides a unifying framework, the absence of such a quantity in non-equilibrium settings complicates their theoretical understanding. Granular materials, driven out of equilibrium by energy dissipation during collisions, serve as an ideal platform to investigate these systems, offering insights into the parallels and distinctions between equilibrium and non-equilibrium phase behavior. For example, the coexisting dense phase is typically colder than the dilute phase, a result usually attributed to greater dissipation in denser regions. In this article, we demonstrate that this is not always the case. Using a simple numerical granular model, we show that a hot solid and a cold liquid can coexist in granular systems. This counterintuitive phenomenon arises because the collision frequency can be lower in the solid phase than in the liquid phase, consistent with equilibrium results for hard-disk systems. We further demonstrate that kinetic theory can be extended to accurately predict phase temperatures even at very high packing fractions, including within the solid phase. Our results highlight the importance of collisional dynamics and energy exchange in determining phase behavior in granular materials, offering new insights into non-equilibrium phase coexistence and the complex physics underlying granular systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17531 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top: ∆ + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison between kinetic theory predictions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. a) Evolution of pressure (in arbitrary units) as a function of density for the GLM, for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b) where the shaded area are the region in which the inequality Eq. (17) is verified. In contrast, when Λ < 1, ˜p GLM changes from being decreasing to increasing at a value of T˜∗ between 0 and 1. Hence, the constraint on the pressure alone does not determine which pha…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This is exemplified in Fig

    Hence, the constraint on the pressure alone does not determine which phase is hotter. This is exemplified in Fig. 4c) and d). However in this limit, the system was typically always observed to crystallize via a continuous transition, rather than through a phase coexistence, in numerical simulations (see Appendix. B)

  2. [2]

    Motility-induced phase separation

    Michael E Cates and Julien Tailleur. Motility-induced phase separation. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., 6(1):219–244, 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    On the equilibrium of het- erogeneous substances

    Josiah Willard Gibbs. On the equilibrium of het- erogeneous substances. American Journal of Science, 3(96):441–458, 1878

  4. [4]

    Chemical reaction models for non- equilibrium phase transitions

    Friedrich Schl¨ ogl. Chemical reaction models for non- equilibrium phase transitions. Zeitschrift f¨ urphysik, 253(2):147–161, 1972

    1972

  5. [5]

    Active phase separation: new phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics

    ME Cates and C Nardini. Active phase separation: new phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02854, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Interrupted motility induced phase separation in aligning active col- loids

    Marjolein N Van Der Linden, Lachlan C Alexander, Dirk GAL Aarts, and Olivier Dauchot. Interrupted motility induced phase separation in aligning active col- loids. Physical review letters, 123(9):098001, 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    Motility-induced temperature difference in co- existing phases

    Suvendu Mandal, Benno Liebchen, and Hartmut L¨ owen. Motility-induced temperature difference in co- existing phases. Physical review letters, 123(22):228001, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Effect of self- propulsion on equilibrium clustering

    Ethayaraja Mani and Hartmut L¨ owen. Effect of self- propulsion on equilibrium clustering. Physical Review E, 92(3):032301, 2015

    2015

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    Arrested phase separation in reproduc- ing bacteria creates a generic route to pattern forma- tion

    Michael E Cates, D Marenduzzo, I Pagonabarraga, and J Tailleur. Arrested phase separation in reproduc- ing bacteria creates a generic route to pattern forma- tion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26):11715–11720, 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    Clusters, asters, and collective oscillations in chemotactic colloids

    Suropriya Saha, Ramin Golestanian, and Sriram Ra- maswamy. Clusters, asters, and collective oscillations in chemotactic colloids. Physical Review E, 89(6):062316, 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Self-assembly of active attractive spheres

    Vasileios Prymidis, Harmen Sielcken, and Laura Filion. Self-assembly of active attractive spheres. Soft Matter, 11 11(21):4158–4166, 2015

    2015

  4. [12]

    Hy- drodynamic suppression of phase separation in active suspensions

    Ricard Matas-Navarro, Ramin Golestanian, Tan- niemola B Liverpool, and Suzanne M Fielding. Hy- drodynamic suppression of phase separation in active suspensions. Physical Review E, 90(3):032304, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Clustering and pattern formation in chemorepulsive active colloids

    Benno Liebchen, Davide Marenduzzo, Ignacio Pago- nabarraga, and Michael E Cates. Clustering and pattern formation in chemorepulsive active colloids. Physical review letters, 115(25):258301, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Scalar φ 4 field theory for active- particle phase separation

    Raphael Wittkowski, Adriano Tiribocchi, Joakim Sten- hammar, Rosalind J Allen, Davide Marenduzzo, and Michael E Cates. Scalar φ 4 field theory for active- particle phase separation. Nature communications, 5(1):4351, 2014

    2014

  7. [15]

    Flow-induced phase separation of active particles is controlled by boundary conditions

    Shashi Thutupalli, Delphine Geyer, Rajesh Singh, Ronojoy Adhikari, and Howard A Stone. Flow-induced phase separation of active particles is controlled by boundary conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(21):5403–5408, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Mechanical theory of nonequilib- rium coexistence and motility-induced phase separa- tion

    Ahmad K Omar, Hyeongjoo Row, Stewart A Mallory, and John F Brady. Mechanical theory of nonequilib- rium coexistence and motility-induced phase separa- tion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(18):e2219900120, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Generalized thermodynamics of motility-induced phase separation: phase equilibria, laplace pressure, and change of ensem- bles

    Alexandre P Solon, Joakim Stenhammar, Michael E Cates, Yariv Kafri, and Julien Tailleur. Generalized thermodynamics of motility-induced phase separation: phase equilibria, laplace pressure, and change of ensem- bles. New Journal of Physics, 20(7):075001, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Interface roughening in nonequilibrium phase-separated systems

    Marc Besse, Giordano Fausti, Michael E Cates, Bertrand Delamotte, and Cesare Nardini. Interface roughening in nonequilibrium phase-separated systems. Physical Review Letters, 130(18):187102, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Interface dynamics of wet active systems

    Fernando Caballero, Ananyo Maitra, and Cesare Nar- dini. Interface dynamics of wet active systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02288, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ordering kinetics in the active model b.Physical Review E, 104(1):014606, 2021

    Sudipta Pattanayak, Shradha Mishra, and Sanjay Puri. Ordering kinetics in the active model b.Physical Review E, 104(1):014606, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Self-organized critical coexistence phase in repulsive active particles

    Xia-qing Shi, Giordano Fausti, Hugues Chat´ e, Cesare Nardini, and Alexandre Solon. Self-organized critical coexistence phase in repulsive active particles. Physical Review Letters, 125(16):168001, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: reversal of the ostwald process

    Elsen Tjhung, Cesare Nardini, and Michael E Cates. Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: reversal of the ostwald process. Physical Review X, 8(3):031080, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Statistical properties of microphase and bub- bly phase-separated active fluids

    Giordano Fausti, Michael E Cates, and Cesare Nar- dini. Statistical properties of microphase and bub- bly phase-separated active fluids. Physical Review E, 110(4):L042103, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Microscopic origins of the swim pressure and the anoma- lous surface tension of active matter

    Ahmad K Omar, Zhen-Gang Wang, and John F Brady. Microscopic origins of the swim pressure and the anoma- lous surface tension of active matter. Physical Review E, 101(1):012604, 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Motility-induced microphase and macrophase separa- tion in a two-dimensional active brownian particle sys- tem

    Claudio B Caporusso, Pasquale Digregorio, Demian Levis, Leticia F Cugliandolo, and Giuseppe Gonnella. Motility-induced microphase and macrophase separa- tion in a two-dimensional active brownian particle sys- tem. Physical Review Letters, 125(17):178004, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Curvature-dependent tension and tangential flows at the interface of motility-induced phases

    Adam Patch, Daniel M Sussman, David Yllanes, and M Cristina Marchetti. Curvature-dependent tension and tangential flows at the interface of motility-induced phases. Soft matter, 14(36):7435–7445, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    The mechanics of nucleation and growth and the surface tensions of active matter

    Luke Langford and Ahmad K Omar. The mechanics of nucleation and growth and the surface tensions of active matter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06462, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Non-equilibrium phase coexistence in boundary-driven diffusive systems

    Shin-ichi Sasa and Naoko Nakagawa. Non-equilibrium phase coexistence in boundary-driven diffusive systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12353, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Surface tensions between active fluids and solid interfaces: Bare vs dressed

    Ruben Zakine, Yongfeng Zhao, Miloˇ s Kneˇ zevi´ c, Adrian Daerr, Yariv Kafri, Julien Tailleur, and Fr´ ed´ eric van Wi- jland. Surface tensions between active fluids and solid interfaces: Bare vs dressed. Physical Review Letters, 124(24):248003, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Heat-induced liquid hovering in liquid-gas coexistence under gravity

    Akira Yoshida, Naoko Nakagawa, and Shin-ichi Sasa. Heat-induced liquid hovering in liquid-gas coexistence under gravity. Physical Review Letters, 133(11):117101, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Liquid-gas transi- tions in steady heat conduction

    Naoko Nakagawa and Shin-ichi Sasa. Liquid-gas transi- tions in steady heat conduction. Physical review letters, 119(26):260602, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Stochastic order parameter dynam- ics for phase coexistence in heat conduction

    Shin-ichi Sasa, Naoko Nakagawa, Masato Itami, and Yohei Nakayama. Stochastic order parameter dynam- ics for phase coexistence in heat conduction. Physical Review E, 103(6):062129, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Control of metastable states by heat flux in the hamiltonian potts model

    Michikazu Kobayashi, Naoko Nakagawa, and Shin-ichi Sasa. Control of metastable states by heat flux in the hamiltonian potts model. Physical Review Letters, 130(24):247102, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Non-reciprocal phase transitions

    Michel Fruchart, Ryo Hanai, Peter B Littlewood, and Vincenzo Vitelli. Non-reciprocal phase transitions. Nature, 592(7854):363–369, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Self-organization of primitive metabolic cycles due to non-reciprocal interactions

    Vincent Ouazan-Reboul, Jaime Agudo-Canalejo, and Ramin Golestanian. Self-organization of primitive metabolic cycles due to non-reciprocal interactions. Nature Communications, 14(1):4496, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Phase-coexisting patterns, horizontal segre- gation, and controlled convection in vertically vi- brated binary granular mixtures

    Istafaul Haque Ansari, Nicolas Rivas, and Meheboob Alam. Phase-coexisting patterns, horizontal segre- gation, and controlled convection in vertically vi- brated binary granular mixtures. Physical Review E, 97(1):012911, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Pattern formation in wet granular matter under vertical vibrations

    Lorenz Butzhammer, Simeon V¨ olkel, Ingo Rehberg, and Kai Huang. Pattern formation in wet granular matter under vertical vibrations. Physical Review E, 92(1):012202, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    Inertial effects of self-propelled parti- cles: From active brownian to active langevin motion

    Hartmut L¨ owen. Inertial effects of self-propelled parti- cles: From active brownian to active langevin motion. The Journal of chemical physics, 152(4), 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Phase coexis- tence implications of violating newton’s third law

    Yu-Jen Chiu and Ahmad K Omar. Phase coexis- tence implications of violating newton’s third law. The Journal of chemical physics, 158(16), 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Inertial self-propelled particles

    Lorenzo Caprini and Umberto Marini Bettolo Mar- coni. Inertial self-propelled particles. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 154(2), 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Spontaneous velocity alignment in motility-induced phase separation

    Lorenzo Caprini, Umberto Marini Bettolo Marconi, and Andrea Puglisi. Spontaneous velocity alignment in motility-induced phase separation. Physical review letters, 124(7):078001, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Anomalous fluctuations in homogeneous fluid phase of active brow- nian particles

    Yuta Kuroda, Hiromichi Matsuyama, Takeshi 12 Kawasaki, and Kunimasa Miyazaki. Anomalous fluctuations in homogeneous fluid phase of active brow- nian particles. Physical Review Research, 5(1):013077, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Role of rotational inertia for collective phe- nomena in active matter

    Lorenzo Caprini, Rahul Kumar Gupta, and Hartmut L¨ owen. Role of rotational inertia for collective phe- nomena in active matter. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 24(40):24910–24916, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Active refrigerators powered by iner- tia

    Lukas Hecht, Suvendu Mandal, Hartmut L¨ owen, and Benno Liebchen. Active refrigerators powered by iner- tia. Physical Review Letters, 129(17):178001, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Motility-induced phase sep- aration in an active dumbbell fluid.Europhysics Letters, 108(5):56004, 2014

    Antonio Suma, Giuseppe Gonnella, Davide Maren- duzzo, and Enzo Orlandini. Motility-induced phase sep- aration in an active dumbbell fluid.Europhysics Letters, 108(5):56004, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    Dynamical cluster- ing and wetting phenomena in inertial active matter

    Lorenzo Caprini, Davide Breoni, Anton Ldov, Chris- tian Scholz, and Hartmut L¨ owen. Dynamical cluster- ing and wetting phenomena in inertial active matter. Communications Physics, 7(1):343, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    How to define temperature in active systems

    Lukas Hecht, Lorenzo Caprini, Hartmut L¨ owen, and Benno Liebchen. How to define temperature in active systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19281, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ef- fective two-dimensional model for granular matter with phase separation

    Dino Risso, Rodrigo Soto, and Marcelo Guzm´ an. Ef- fective two-dimensional model for granular matter with phase separation. Physical Review E, 98(2):022901, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Motility- induced coexistence of a hot liquid and a cold gas

    Lukas Hecht, Iris Dong, and Benno Liebchen. Motility- induced coexistence of a hot liquid and a cold gas. Nature Communications, 15(1):3206, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    van der waals nor- mal form for a one-dimensional hydrodynamic model

    C Cartes, MG Clerc, and R Soto. van der waals nor- mal form for a one-dimensional hydrodynamic model. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70(3):031302, 2004

    2004

  43. [51]

    The minimization of mechanical work in vibrated gran- ular matter

    James PD Clewett, Jack Wade, RM Bowley, Stephan Herminghaus, Michael R Swift, and Marco G Mazza. The minimization of mechanical work in vibrated gran- ular matter. Scientific Reports, 6(1):28726, 2016

    2016

  44. [52]

    Van der waals–like transition in fluidized granular matter

    Mederic Argentina, MG Clerc, and R Soto. Van der waals–like transition in fluidized granular matter. Physical review letters, 89(4):044301, 2002

    2002

  45. [53]

    Hydrodynamics of a vibrated granular monolayer

    Evgeniy Khain and Igor S Aranson. Hydrodynamics of a vibrated granular monolayer. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 84(3):031308, 2011

    2011

  46. [54]

    Phase diagram of van der waals–like phase separation in a driven granular gas

    Evgeniy Khain, Baruch Meerson, and Pavel V Sasorov. Phase diagram of van der waals–like phase separation in a driven granular gas. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70(5):051310, 2004

    2004

  47. [55]

    Phase sep- aration in driven granular gases: exploring the elusive character of nonequilibrium steady states

    Stephan Herminghaus and Marco G Mazza. Phase sep- aration in driven granular gases: exploring the elusive character of nonequilibrium steady states. Soft matter, 13(5):898–910, 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    Stability analysis of the homogeneous hydrody- namics of a model for a confined granular gas

    J Javier Brey, V Buz´ on, MI Garc ´ ıa de Soria, and P May- nar. Stability analysis of the homogeneous hydrody- namics of a model for a confined granular gas. Physical Review E, 93(6):062907, 2016

    2016

  49. [57]

    Oscillatory in- stability in a driven granular gas

    Evgeniy Khain and Baruch Meerson. Oscillatory in- stability in a driven granular gas. Europhysics Letters, 65(2):193, 2004

    2004

  50. [58]

    Particle dynamics at the onset of the granular gas-liquid transition

    Martial Noirhomme, Annette Cazaubiel, Eric Falcon, David Fischer, Yves Garrabos, Carole Lecoutre-Chabot, S´ ebastien Mawet, Eric Opsomer, Fabien Palencia, Sal- vatore Pillitteri, et al. Particle dynamics at the onset of the granular gas-liquid transition. Physical Review Lette...

    2021

  51. [59]

    Liquid-gas phase separation in confined vibrated dry granular matter

    Klaus Roeller, James PD Clewett, RM Bowley, Stephan Herminghaus, and Michael R Swift. Liquid-gas phase separation in confined vibrated dry granular matter. Physical Review Letters, 107(4):048002, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    Roles of energy dis- sipation in a liquid-solid transition of out-of-equilibrium systems

    Yuta Komatsu and Hajime Tanaka. Roles of energy dis- sipation in a liquid-solid transition of out-of-equilibrium systems. Physical Review X, 5(3):031025, 2015

    2015

  53. [61]

    Threshold of gas-like to cluster- ing transition in driven granular media in low-gravity environment

    Martial Noirhomme, Annette Cazaubiel, Alexis Dar- ras, Eric Falcon, David Fischer, Yves Garrabos, Car- ole Lecoutre-Chabot, Simon Merminod, Eric Opsomer, Fabien Palencia, et al. Threshold of gas-like to cluster- ing transition in driven granular media in low-gravity environmen...

    2018

  54. [62]

    Capillarylike fluctuations of a solid-liquid interface in a noncohesive granular system

    Li-Hua Luu, Gustavo Castillo, Nicol´ as Mujica, and Ro- drigo Soto. Capillarylike fluctuations of a solid-liquid interface in a noncohesive granular system. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 87(4):040202, 2013

    2013

  55. [63]

    Liquid–solid-like transition in quasi-one-dimensional driven granular media

    Marcel G Clerc, Patricio Cordero, Jocelyn Dunstan, K Huff, Nicol´ as Mujica, Dino Risso, and Germ´ an Varas. Liquid–solid-like transition in quasi-one-dimensional driven granular media. Nature Physics, 4(3):249–254, 2008

    2008

  56. [64]

    Characteri- zation of the energy bursts in vibrated shallow granular systems

    N Rivas, P Cordero, D Risso, and R Soto. Characteri- zation of the energy bursts in vibrated shallow granular systems. Granular Matter, 14:157–162, 2012

    2012

  57. [65]

    Nonequilibrium two-phase coexis- tence in a confined granular layer

    Alexis Prevost, Paul Melby, David A Egolf, and Jef- frey S Urbach. Nonequilibrium two-phase coexis- tence in a confined granular layer. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70(5):050301, 2004

    2004

  58. [66]

    The dynamics of thin vibrated granular layers

    Paul Melby, F Vega Reyes, Alexis Prevost, Rae Robert- son, Pramukta Kumar, David A Egolf, and Jeffrey S Urbach. The dynamics of thin vibrated granular layers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 17(24):S2689, 2005

    2005

  59. [67]

    Sublimation of a vibrated gran- ular monolayer: Coexistence of gas and solid

    Andreas G¨ otzendorfer, Jennifer Kreft, Christof A Kru- elle, and Ingo Rehberg. Sublimation of a vibrated gran- ular monolayer: Coexistence of gas and solid. Physical review letters, 95(13):135704, 2005

    2005

  60. [68]

    Geometry-controlled phase transition in vibrated gran- ular media

    Ren´ e Zu˜ niga, Germ´ an Varas, and St´ ephane Job. Geometry-controlled phase transition in vibrated gran- ular media. Scientific Reports, 12(1):14989, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    J. S. Olafsen and J. S. Urbach. Clustering, order, and collapse in a driven granular monolayer. Physical Review Letters, 81:4369–4372, Nov 1998

    1998

  62. [70]

    The effects of forcing and dissipation on phase transi- tions in thin granular layers

    Alexander E Lobkovsky, F Vega Reyes, and JS Urbach. The effects of forcing and dissipation on phase transi- tions in thin granular layers. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 179(1):113–122, 2009

    2009

  63. [71]

    Effect of inelasticity on the phase transitions of a thin vi- brated granular layer

    Francisco Vega Reyes and Jeffrey S Urbach. Effect of inelasticity on the phase transitions of a thin vi- brated granular layer. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 78(5):051301, 2008

    2008

  64. [72]

    Self-assembly and non-equilibrium phase coexistence in a binary granular mixture

    A Plati, R Maire, F Boulogne, F Restagno, F Smallen- burg, and G Foffi. Self-assembly and non-equilibrium phase coexistence in a binary granular mixture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21576, 2024

    2024

  65. [73]

    Temperature inversion across coexisting phases in two-dimensional driven granular materials

    Guoxian Gao, Yanpei Chen, Ji Xu, Kai Li, and Bona Lu. Temperature inversion across coexisting phases in two-dimensional driven granular materials. Physics of Fluids, 36(12), 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Quasi-crystalline order in vibrating granular matter

    Andrea Plati, Raphael Maire, Etienne Fayen, Fran- 13 cois Boulogne, Frederic Restagno, Frank Smallenburg, and Giuseppe Foffi. Quasi-crystalline order in vibrating granular matter. Nature Physics, 20(3):465–471, 2024

    2024

  67. [75]

    Interplay between an absorbing phase transition and synchronization in a driven granular sys- tem

    R Maire, A Plati, M Stockinger, E Trizac, F Smallen- burg, and G Foffi. Interplay between an absorbing phase transition and synchronization in a driven granular sys- tem. Physical Review Letters, 132(23):238202, 2024

    2024

  68. [76]

    Universality and criticality of a second-order granular solid-liquid-like phase transition

    Gustavo Castillo, Nicol´ as Mujica, and Rodrigo Soto. Universality and criticality of a second-order granular solid-liquid-like phase transition. Physical Review E, 91(1):012141, 2015

    2015

  69. [77]

    Fluctuations and criticality of a granular solid-liquid- like phase transition

    Gustavo Castillo, Nicol´ as Mujica, and Rodrigo Soto. Fluctuations and criticality of a granular solid-liquid- like phase transition. Physical Review Letters, 109(9):095701, 2012

    2012

  70. [78]

    Losert, D

    W. Losert, D. G. W. Cooper, and J. P. Gollub. Prop- agating front in an excited granular layer. Physical Review E, 59:5855–5861, May 1999

    1999

  71. [79]

    Critical phenom- ena in quasi-two-dimensional vibrated granular systems

    Marcelo Guzm´ an and Rodrigo Soto. Critical phenom- ena in quasi-two-dimensional vibrated granular systems. Physical Review E, 97(1):012907, 2018

    2018

  72. [80]

    Argentina, M

    M. Argentina, M. G. Clerc, and R. Soto. van der waals– like transition in fluidized granular matter. Physical Review Letters, 89:044301, Jul 2002

    2002

  73. [81]

    Egolf, and Jef- frey S

    Alexis Prevost, Paul Melby, David A. Egolf, and Jef- frey S. Urbach. Nonequilibrium two-phase coexistence in a confined granular layer. Physical Review E, 70:050301, Nov 2004

    2004

  74. [82]

    Crystallization of a quasi-two-dimensional granu- lar fluid

    Pedro M Reis, Rohit A Ingale, and Mark D Shat- tuck. Crystallization of a quasi-two-dimensional granu- lar fluid. Physical review letters, 96(25):258001, 2006

    2006

  75. [83]

    solid phase

    To = 1 2 m∆2 α√π/2 + p α2π/4 + (1 − α)2 2 /(1 − α2)2 and is independent on the density. B. Numerical simulations Using event-driven molecular dynamics [91] we simu- late both models described above using up to N ≃ 105 particles in boxes of size Lx × Ly with periodic boundary c...

  76. [84]

    Hyperuniform states generated by a critical fric- tion field

    Gustavo Castillo, Nicol´ as Mujica, N´ estor Sep´ ulveda, Juan Carlos Sobarzo, Marcelo Guzm´ an, and Rodrigo Soto. Hyperuniform states generated by a critical fric- tion field. Physical Review E, 100(3):032902, 2019

    2019

  77. [85]

    Hydro- dynamic modes in a confined granular fluid

    Ricardo Brito, Dino Risso, and Rodrigo Soto. Hydro- dynamic modes in a confined granular fluid. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 87(2):022209, 2013

    2013

  78. [86]

    Granular brownian motion

    A Sarracino, D Villamaina, G Costantini, and A Puglisi. Granular brownian motion. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2010(04):P04013, apr 2010

    2010

  79. [87]

    Transport and fluctuations in granular fluids: From Boltzmann equation to hydrodynamics, diffusion and motor effects

    Andrea Puglisi. Transport and fluctuations in granular fluids: From Boltzmann equation to hydrodynamics, diffusion and motor effects. Springer, 2014

    2014

  80. [88]

    Maire and A

    R. Maire and A. Plati. Enhancing (quasi-)long-range order in a two-dimensional driven crystal. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 161(5):054902, 08 2024

    2024

  81. [89]

    Two-step melt- ing in two dimensions: first-order liquid-hexatic transi- tion

    Etienne P Bernard and Werner Krauth. Two-step melt- ing in two dimensions: first-order liquid-hexatic transi- tion. Physical review letters, 107(15):155704, 2011

    2011

  82. [90]

    Calculating center of mass in an unbounded 2d environment

    Linge Bai and David Breen. Calculating center of mass in an unbounded 2d environment. Journal of Graphics Tools, 13(4):53–60, 2008

    2008

  83. [91]

    Universality class of the motility-induced critical point in large scale off-lattice simulations of active particles

    Claudio Maggi, Matteo Paoluzzi, Andrea Crisanti, Emanuela Zaccarelli, and Nicoletta Gnan. Universality class of the motility-induced critical point in large scale off-lattice simulations of active particles. Soft Matter, 17(14):3807–3812, 2021

    2021

  84. [92]

    Critical behavior of active brownian particles

    Jonathan Tammo Siebert, Florian Dittrich, Friederike Schmid, Kurt Binder, Thomas Speck, and Peter Virnau. Critical behavior of active brownian particles. Physical Review E, 98(3):030601, 2018

    2018

  85. [93]

    Efficient event-driven simulations of hard spheres

    Frank Smallenburg. Efficient event-driven simulations of hard spheres. The European Physical Journal E, 45(3):22, 2022

    2022

  86. [94]

    What is the tem- perature of a granular medium? Journal of physics: condensed matter, 17(24):S2405, 2005

    Andrea Baldassarri, Alain Barrat, G D’anna, Vittorio Loreto, P Mayor, and A Puglisi. What is the tem- perature of a granular medium? Journal of physics: condensed matter, 17(24):S2405, 2005

    2005

  87. [95]

    Temperature in and out of equilibrium: A review of concepts, tools and attempts

    A Puglisi, A Sarracino, and A Vulpiani. Temperature in and out of equilibrium: A review of concepts, tools and attempts. Physics Reports, 709:1–60, 2017

    2017

  88. [96]

    Interfacial tension effects in finite, periodic, two-dimensional systems

    Joseph E Mayer and Wm W Wood. Interfacial tension effects in finite, periodic, two-dimensional systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 42(12):4268–4274, 1965

    1965

  89. [97]

    Hard-disk equation of state: First-order liquid-hexatic transition in two dimensions with three simulation methods

    Michael Engel, Joshua A Anderson, Sharon C Glotzer, Masaharu Isobe, Etienne P Bernard, and Werner Krauth. Hard-disk equation of state: First-order liquid-hexatic transition in two dimensions with three simulation methods. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matt...

    2013

  90. [98]

    Hard-disk pres- sure computations—a historic perspective

    Botao Li, Yoshihiko Nishikawa, Philipp H¨ ollmer, Louis Carillo, AC Maggs, and Werner Krauth. Hard-disk pres- sure computations—a historic perspective. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(23), 2022

    2022

  91. [99]

    Randomly driven granular fluids: Collisional statistics and short scale structure

    I Pagonabarraga, E Trizac, TPC Van Noije, and MH Ernst. Randomly driven granular fluids: Collisional statistics and short scale structure. Physical Review E, 65(1):011303, 2001

    2001

  92. [100]

    En- skog kinetic theory for a model of a confined quasi- two-dimensional granular fluid

    Vicente Garz´ o, Ricardo Brito, and Rodrigo Soto. En- skog kinetic theory for a model of a confined quasi- two-dimensional granular fluid. Physical Review E, 98(5):052904, 2018

    2018

  93. [101]

    Dynamics of a first-order transition to an absorbing state

    Baptiste N´ eel, Ignacio Rondini, Alex Turzillo, Nicol´ as Mujica, and Rodrigo Soto. Dynamics of a first-order transition to an absorbing state. Physical Review E, 89(4):042206, 2014

    2014

  94. [102]

    Theory of simple liquids: with applications to soft matter

    Jean-Pierre Hansen and Ian Ranald McDonald. Theory of simple liquids: with applications to soft matter. Aca- demic press, 2013

    2013

  95. [103]

    Fluctuating hydrody- namics and correlation lengths in a driven granular fluid

    Giacomo Gradenigo, Alessandro Sarracino, Dario Vil- lamaina, and Andrea Puglisi. Fluctuating hydrody- namics and correlation lengths in a driven granular fluid. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011(08):P08017, 2011

    2011

  96. [104]

    Molecular dynam- ics simulations of vibrated granular gases

    Alain Barrat and Emmanuel Trizac. Molecular dynam- ics simulations of vibrated granular gases. Physical Review E, 66(5):051303, 2002

    2002

  97. [105]

    Randomly driven granular fluids: Large-scale structure

    TPC Van Noije, MH Ernst, Emmanuel Trizac, and I Pagonabarraga. Randomly driven granular fluids: Large-scale structure. Physical Review E, 59(4):4326, 1999

    1999

  98. [106]

    Statisti- cal mechanics of crystal nuclei of hard spheres

    Marjolein de Jager, Carlos Vega, Pablo Montero de Hi- jes, Frank Smallenburg, and Laura Filion. Statisti- cal mechanics of crystal nuclei of hard spheres. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04394, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Kinetic theory of granular gases

    Nikolai V Brilliantov and Thorsten P¨ oschel. Kinetic theory of granular gases. Oxford University Press, USA, 2004

    2004

  100. [108]

    Velocity distributions in homogeneous granular fluids: the free and the heated case

    TPC Van Noije and MH Ernst. Velocity distributions in homogeneous granular fluids: the free and the heated case. Granular Matter, 1(2):57–64, 1998

    1998

  101. [109]

    The granular phase diagram

    Sergei E Esipov and Thorsten P¨ oschel. The granular phase diagram. Journal of statistical physics, 86:1385– 1395, 1997

    1997

  102. [110]

    Experimental evidence for molecular chaos in granular gases

    GW Baxter and JS Olafsen. Experimental evidence for molecular chaos in granular gases. Physical review letters, 99(2):028001, 2007

    2007

  103. [111]

    Diffusion of impurities in a moder- 14 ately dense confined granular gas

    Rub´ en G´ omez Gonz´ alez, Vicente Garz´ o, Ricardo Brito, and Rodrigo Soto. Diffusion of impurities in a moder- 14 ately dense confined granular gas. Physics of Fluids, 36(12), 2024

    2024

  104. [112]

    Breakdown of the sonine expansion for the velocity distribution of granular gases

    Nikolai V Brilliantov and Thorsten P¨ oschel. Breakdown of the sonine expansion for the velocity distribution of granular gases. Europhysics Letters, 74(3):424, 2006

    2006

  105. [113]

    Energy of a single bead bouncing on a vibrating plate: Experiments and nu- merical simulations

    J-C G´ eminard and C Laroche. Energy of a single bead bouncing on a vibrating plate: Experiments and nu- merical simulations. Physical Review E, 68(3):031305, 2003

    2003

  106. [114]

    Infinite-pressure phase diagram of binary mixtures of (non) additive hard disks

    Etienne Fayen, Anuradha Jagannathan, Giuseppe Foffi, and Frank Smallenburg. Infinite-pressure phase diagram of binary mixtures of (non) additive hard disks. The Journal of chemical physics, 152(20), 2020

    2020

  107. [115]

    Self-assembly of dodecagonal and octagonal quasicrystals in hard spheres on a plane

    Etienne Fayen, Marianne Imp´ eror-Clerc, Laura Filion, Giuseppe Foffi, and Frank Smallenburg. Self-assembly of dodecagonal and octagonal quasicrystals in hard spheres on a plane. Soft Matter, 19(14):2654–2663, 2023

    2023

  108. [116]

    Quasicrystal of binary hard spheres on a plane stabilized by configurational entropy

    Etienne Fayen, Laura Filion, Giuseppe Foffi, and Frank Smallenburg. Quasicrystal of binary hard spheres on a plane stabilized by configurational entropy. Physical Review Letters, 132(4):048202, 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Gran- ular beads in a vibrating, quasi two-dimensional cell: The true shape of the effective pair potential

    Gustavo M Rodr ´ ıguez-Li˜ n´ an and Marco Heinen. Gran- ular beads in a vibrating, quasi two-dimensional cell: The true shape of the effective pair potential. Journal of Computational Physics, 394:232–242, 2019

    2019

  110. [118]

    Effective potentials of dissipative hard spheres in granular matter

    RA Bordallo-Favela, A Ram ´ ırez-Sa ´ ıto, CA Pacheco- Molina, JA Perera-Burgos, Y Nahmad-Molinari, and G P´ erez. Effective potentials of dissipative hard spheres in granular matter. The European Physical Journal E, 28:395–400, 2009

    2009

  111. [119]

    Effective potentials in a bidi- mensional vibrated granular gas

    Stephanie Vel´ azquez-P´ erez, Gabriel P´ erez-´Angel, and Yuri Nahmad-Molinari. Effective potentials in a bidi- mensional vibrated granular gas. Physical Review E, 94(3):032903, 2016

    2016

  112. [120]

    Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two- dimensional systems

    John Michael Kosterlitz and David James Thouless. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two- dimensional systems. In Basic Notions Of Condensed Matter Physics, pages 493–515. CRC Press, 2018

    2018

  113. [121]

    Theory of two-dimensional melting

    BI Halperin and David R Nelson. Theory of two-dimensional melting. Physical Review Letters, 41(2):121, 1978

    1978

  114. [122]

    Dislocation-mediated melting in two dimensions

    David R Nelson and BI Halperin. Dislocation-mediated melting in two dimensions. Physical Review B, 19(5):2457, 1979

    1979

  115. [123]

    Melting and the vector coulomb gas in two dimensions

    AP Young. Melting and the vector coulomb gas in two dimensions. Physical Review B, 19(4):1855, 1979

    1979

  116. [124]

    Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group i

    VL314399 Berezinskii. Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group i. classical systems. Sov. Phys. JETP, 32(3):493–500, 1971

    1971

  117. [125]

    Melting in two-dimensional systems: Charac- terizing continuous and first-order transitions

    ´Oscar Toledano, M Pancorbo, JE Alvarellos, and ´Oscar G´ alvez. Melting in two-dimensional systems: Charac- terizing continuous and first-order transitions. Physical Review B, 103(9):094107, 2021

    2021

  118. [126]

    Two- dimensional melting: From liquid-hexatic coexistence to continuous transitions

    Sebastian C Kapfer and Werner Krauth. Two- dimensional melting: From liquid-hexatic coexistence to continuous transitions. Physical review letters, 114(3):035702, 2015

    2015

  119. [127]

    Two-dimensional crystals far from equilib- rium

    Leonardo Galliano, Michael E Cates, and Ludovic Berthier. Two-dimensional crystals far from equilib- rium. Physical Review Letters, 131(4):047101, 2023

    2023

  120. [128]

    Long-range translational order and hyperuni- formity in two-dimensional chiral active crystal

    Yuta Kuroda, Takeshi Kawasaki, and Kunimasa Miyazaki. Long-range translational order and hyperuni- formity in two-dimensional chiral active crystal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19192, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Long-range or- der in two-dimensional systems with fluctuating active stresses, 2024

    Yann-Edwin Keta and Silke Henkes. Long-range or- der in two-dimensional systems with fluctuating active stresses, 2024

    2024

  122. [130]

    Statistical mechan- ics of fluidized granular media: Short-range velocity cor- relations

    Rodrigo Soto and Michel Mareschal. Statistical mechan- ics of fluidized granular media: Short-range velocity cor- relations. Physical Review E, 63(4):041303, 2001

    2001

  123. [131]

    Collisional statistics of the hard-sphere gas

    Paolo Visco, Fr´ ed´ eric van Wijland, and Emmanuel Trizac. Collisional statistics of the hard-sphere gas. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77(4):041117, 2008

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.