A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\c{c}\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\c{c}\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas

Leonardo A. M. Souza

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 31 references

A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\c{c}\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\c{c}\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For Gaussian optical probes, the best possible precision in squeezing estimation is set by photon number and, for two-mode states, by entanglement; the paper gives an exact formula for the quantum Fisher information.

desk verdict A didactic review with a sound first half and a quantitative inconsistency in the final section that must be fixed before the paper can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17797 v1 pith:SHKP4YEF submitted 2024-11-26 quant-ph

Leonardo A. M. Souza This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords quantummetrologyCramér-RaoboundFisherinformationGaussianstatessqueezingestimationlogarithmicnegativityentanglement-enhancedprecisionparameter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This article gives a didactic tour of classical and quantum parameter-estimation theory, from the Cramér-Rao bound and Fisher information to their quantum counterparts, and then applies it to a concrete question: how precisely can an unknown squeezing parameter encoded in one mode of a Gaussian optical state be estimated? The paper's contribution is a set of precision bounds: for a single mode the phase-averaged quantum Fisher information is at most $4n_A^2+4n_A+2$, reached by pure squeezed states, while coherent states give only $4n_A+2$. For two-mode entangled Gaussian states the paper derives an exact analytic formula relating this Fisher information to the mode energy $n_A$ and the logarithmic negativity $E_N$, showing that entanglement raises the achievable precision. Since the quantum Cramér-Rao bound turns this Fisher information directly into a minimum estimation error, the result gives a concrete benchmark for quantum metrology with Gaussian states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phase-averaged quantum Fisher information, $H_\epsilon(\rho)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} H_\epsilon^{(\theta)}(\rho)\,d\theta$, computed from the symmetric logarithmic derivative $L_\theta$ through $H=\mathrm{Tr}[\rho L_\theta^2]$. The parameter is encoded by the single-mode squeezing operator $S_\epsilon^{(A)}=\exp[\tfrac{\epsilon}{2}(a^2-(a^\dagger)^2)]$, while local rotations $R_A$ and $R_B$ are used to remove the known dynamic phase; averaging over the phase makes the figure of merit independent of that detail. The Gaussian-state machinery, covariance matrices in standard form, symplectic spectra, and the logarithmic negativity $E_N=\max(0,-\ln \tilde{\nu})$ with $\tilde{\nu}$ the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partially transposed covariance matrix, enters through the symplectic invariants that appear in Eq. (36). This machinery reduces the state space to the two resource variables, photon number $n_A$ and entanglement $E_N$, that the final formula depends on.

What would settle it

Prepare a two-mode squeezed vacuum state with known mean photon number $n_A$ and measured logarithmic negativity $E_N$, estimate the squeezing parameter by near-optimal homodyne measurements, and compare the observed variance with $1/(M H_\epsilon(\rho))$ using Eq. (36). If the variance falls below this bound, or if a direct computation of $H_\epsilon(\rho)=\mathrm{Tr}[\rho L_\epsilon^2]$ for a Gaussian state outside the standard form exceeds $4n_A^2+4n_A+2$ at fixed $n_A$, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the phase-averaged quantum Fisher information $H_\epsilon(\rho)$, obtained by averaging over all propagation phases $\theta$, is a faithful figure of merit for estimating the squeezing parameter $\epsilon$, and that for Gaussian states this figure is controlled entirely by energy and quantum correlations. For single-mode probes, $H_\epsilon(\rho)$ lies between $4(2n_A+1)^2/(1+(2n_A+1)^2)$ for thermal states and $4n_A^2+4n_A+2$ for pure squeezed states, so squeezing is what buys the quadratic scaling. For two-mode entangled Gaussian states, the paper reports the closed expression $H_\epsilon(\rho)=2+\frac{8n_A(1+n_A)}{1+(2+4n_A-e^{-E_N})e^{-E_N}}$, which increases monotonically with the logarithmic negativity $E_N$ at fixed photon number $n_A$. The claim is that entanglement is therefore a practical metrological resource: more entanglement means a smaller error bound for detecting the same squeezing parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume the dynamic phase accumulated by the modes is known well enough to be removed by local unitary operations, and that uniform averaging over all phases is the correct figure of merit; if either fails, Eq. (36) and the stated bounds need not govern the actual estimation error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For single-mode Gaussian probes, no state can beat the pure-squeezed upper bound $H=4n_A^2+4n_A+2$, so the best squeezing-estimation accuracy at a given mean photon number is fixed and known.
Coherent states are limited to $4n_A+2$, meaning the advantage from squeezing grows quadratically with photon number rather than linearly.
For two-mode entangled states, Eq. (36) provides a direct trade-off: at fixed energy, increasing logarithmic negativity increases the quantum Fisher information, and the paper shows this bound is attained by pure two-mode squeezed states.
The lower bounds for thermal and separable states identify the penalty for noise and lack of correlations, so the same figure of merit quantifies how much entanglement is needed to reach a target precision.
Because the quantum Cramér-Rao bound converts $H_\epsilon(\rho)$ into the minimal variance of any unbiased estimator, the formulas are directly usable as benchmarks for quantum sensing protocols based on Gaussian states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Not stated by the paper: in Eq. (36), as $E_N$ grows the factor $e^{-E_N}$ drives $H_\epsilon(\rho)$ toward $2+8n_A(1+n_A)$, so the return on extra entanglement saturates; most of the precision gain comes at low to moderate entanglement.
A natural testable extension is to optimize over all two-mode Gaussian states with fixed $n_A$ and $E_N$, going beyond the paper's random sampling, to check whether Eq. (36) is truly the upper bound.
Because the phase-dependent Fisher information can exceed its uniform average, the phase-averaged bound is likely conservative for phase-locked experiments; this is an interpretation of the paper's construction, not one of its results.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a teaching review, not a research paper. The first four sections are standard quantum estimation theory, clearly written and mostly correct. The author is honest that the Section 5 results were published before (Refs. [20,21]) and are being re-presented for a school audience. That is the right approach for a review.

The problem is in Section 5.3.6. The paper's own upper bound for entangled two-mode squeezed states, Eq. (34), is H = 4n_A^2 + 4n_A + 2. But Eq. (36), which is claimed to give the analytic dependence on logarithmic negativity, reduces to H = 8n_A^2 + 8n_A + 2 in the large-E_N limit, and for the two-mode squeezed vacuum with n_A = 1 it gives H = 9 instead of 10. So the formula contradicts the bound it is supposed to describe. Since no derivation is given, the reader cannot tell which expression is correct. This is a load-bearing flaw because the paper's conclusion about entanglement-enhanced precision rests on this formula. The qualitative point (entanglement helps) is plausibly true and supported by the original papers, but this version is not internally consistent.

Other issues are minor by comparison. The figures use 10^5 randomly sampled Gaussian states but give no distribution parameter values, so the plots are not reproducible. The Portuguese language and the journal scope limit the audience, but that is not a scientific defect.

What the paper does well: the exposition of classical and quantum Fisher information, Bures distance, Braunstein-Caves inequality, and the SQL vs Heisenberg limit is accurate and accessible. The examples are well chosen. For a student or a researcher new to quantum metrology, this is a usable introduction.

Bottom line: the didactic material deserves to be read, but Section 5 needs correction. I would send this to a referee, with a specific request to verify Eqs. (35)–(36) against the author's prior papers and against the bound in Eq. (34). After that, it is acceptable as a review article.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a didactic review, written in Portuguese, of classical and quantum parameter-estimation theory. It introduces the Cramér-Rao bound and Fisher information, the Bures/Hellinger distance perspective, the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, the standard quantum limit and the Heisenberg limit, and then devotes Section 5 to the author's prior work on estimating an unknown squeezing parameter encoded in a mode of a Gaussian state. The original part reports average quantum Fisher information bounds for single-mode, separable, discordant, and entangled Gaussian states, culminating in Eq. (36), which is claimed to give an analytical relation between the average QFI and the logarithmic negativity E_N.

Significance. If the Section 5 results were correct, the paper would offer a useful educational entry point into continuous-variable quantum metrology and a compact statement of an analytical relation between estimation precision and entanglement. The didactic Sections 2–4 are mostly standard and clearly written, and the numerical scans over 10^5 random Gaussian states in Figures 5, 7–11 are a useful visual summary. However, the central quantitative claim of §5.3.6 is internally inconsistent: Eq. (36) exceeds the paper's own upper bound (25)/(34) in the large-E_N limit and does not reduce to that bound for two-mode squeezed vacuum states. Since Eqs. (25)–(36) are asserted without derivation and depend on Refs. [20,21], the validity of the headline entanglement–precision relation is currently unsupported. The significance of the paper therefore hinges on correcting or deriving Eq. (36) and reconciling it with Eq. (34).

major comments (3)

[§5.3.6, Eq. (36) vs. Eqs. (25) and (34)] Equation (36), Hθ = 2 + 8n_A(1+n_A) / [1 + (2+4n_A - e^{-E_N}) e^{-E_N}], is claimed to give the upper envelope of the phase-averaged QFI for entangled two-mode Gaussian states. This contradicts Eqs. (25) and (34), which state the upper bound Hθ = 4n_A^2 + 4n_A + 2. For fixed n_A>0, as E_N→∞ the denominator tends to 1 and the right-hand side tends to 2 + 8n_A(1+n_A) = 8n_A^2 + 8n_A + 2, which exceeds the bound by 4n_A^2 + 4n_A. More sharply, for a two-mode squeezed vacuum with n_A = 1 and E_N = 2asinh(1) ≈ 1.7627, Eq. (36) gives Hθ = 9, while Eq. (34) gives Hθ = 10; the formula does not return the boundary value it is supposed to describe. This is a load-bearing inconsistency in the paper's central analytical result.
[§5.3, Eqs. (25)–(36)] All formulas in Section 5.3 are quoted from Refs. [20,21] without derivation in this manuscript, and §5.3 states only that the results 'também constam na referência [20]'. Because Eq. (36) is internally inconsistent with Eq. (34), the reader cannot determine from the text whether Eq. (35), Eq. (36), or the bound (34) is erroneous. Please provide a self-contained derivation of the phase-averaged QFI for the covariance matrix (33), or at least a precise statement of which published equation is being reproduced, and show explicitly how Eq. (36) is compatible with the upper bound.
[§5.2, phase-knowledge assumption] The strategy and the definition H_ε(ρ) = (1/2π)∫ H_ε^{(θ)}(ρ) dθ presuppose that the dynamical phase θ_{A,B}(t) is known, so that the local unitary (R_A^{†2}⊗R_B^{†2}) can be applied before measurement. If θ is unknown or its distribution is not uniform over [0,2π], the reported bounds and Eq. (36) do not directly apply. This is a stated assumption in the text, but it should be listed as a limitation of the result in the conclusions, because the abstract and §6 advertise technological applications without this qualification.

minor comments (4)

[§5.3.6, Eq. (35)] Equation (35) introduces the symplectic eigenvalue \tildeν but contains no explicit dependence on the parameter d of the covariance matrix (33); please clarify how \tildeν is computed from a, b, c, d and how Eq. (36) follows from Eq. (35).
[§5.3.2, Eqs. (25)–(26)] The text states that the two-mode upper and lower bounds are given 'pelas equações 25 e 26', but Eq. (26) was introduced as a single-mode thermal-state bound; please explain why the same expression bounds two-mode Gaussian states.
[Figures 5–11] The vertical axes are labelled inconsistently as 'H' or 'H θ' across Figures 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11; using a single symbol, e.g., H_ε(ρ), would improve readability.
[§6] There are several grammatical slips in the conclusion (e.g., 'este evidenciamos') and the sentence structure is at places repetitive; a careful language revision is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper is a didactic review whose Section 5 transparently attributes its Gaussian-state QFI results to the author's prior peer-reviewed publications; the Eq. (36) inconsistency is a correctness issue, not a circular one.

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review, and Section 5 states: 'Os resultados apresentados neste trabalho também constam na referência [20]. Porém, aqui tentamos apresentá-los sem tantos detalhes técnicos', while the estimation strategy is attributed to [21]. Both cited works are published, peer-reviewed papers (Physics Letters A and Physical Review A) containing parameter-free analytical statements about Gaussian-state quantum Fisher information; they do not depend on fitted values introduced in the present manuscript, so under the hard rules these citations are real external evidence and do not constitute circularity. Equation (36) is asserted without derivation in this text, and it is numerically inconsistent with Eqs. (25)/(34) for two-mode squeezed vacuum states; however, an unproven or even incorrect formula is not circular unless it is shown to be equivalent by construction to its inputs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no definition is built from the quantity it is supposed to predict, and the phase-averaged QFI is defined and then used consistently. The central derivation chain is therefore self-contained relative to the cited literature; any concern about Eq. (36) belongs to correctness and consistency, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters, no new physical entities, and no new ad hoc constants. The quantities n_A, E_N, and the covariance-matrix entries are physical parameters of the states under study, not free parameters fitted to data. The central formulas are inherited from the author's prior work.

assumptions (7)

standard math Standard postulates of quantum mechanics: states are vectors or density matrices, observables are Hermitian operators, measurement yields eigenvalues with Born probabilities, time evolution is unitary via the Schrödinger equation.
Section 3 states these as background for the quantum estimation theory.
standard math The classical Cramér-Rao inequality Var(theta_hat) >= 1/I(theta,M) and the definition of Fisher information via the score function.
Section 2 uses these to set the classical precision limit and to define Fisher information.
standard math Braunstein-Caves inequality I(theta,M) <= H(theta) and additivity of quantum Fisher information over independent copies.
Section 4.2 relies on these to derive the quantum Cramér-Rao bound and the SQL/Heisenberg scaling.
domain assumption Gaussian states of continuous-variable systems are fully characterized by their displacement vector and covariance matrix, subject to the Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty relation.
Section 5.1 uses the covariance matrix formalism to represent one- and two-mode Gaussian states and to compute QFI.
domain assumption The phase-averaged estimation strategy of Ref. [21] is valid, including the assumption that the dynamic phase theta_{A,B}(t) is known and removable by local unitary operations.
Section 5.2 adopts this strategy and defines the average quantum Fisher information H_epsilon by uniform averaging over phases.
ad hoc to paper The analytical formulas (25) to (36) for the average QFI, taken from Refs. [20] and [21], are correct as reproduced.
Section 5.3 presents these formulas without derivation and defers to the author's own previous papers.
domain assumption Logarithmic negativity E_N = max(0, -ln nu_tilde) is a faithful entanglement measure for Gaussian states, with nu_tilde the smallest symplectic eigenvalue of the partially transposed covariance matrix.
Section 5.1 defines E_N and Section 5.3.6 uses it in Eq. (36).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\c{c}\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\c{c}\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHKP4YEF

@misc{pith2026241117797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\cc\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\cc\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHKP4YEF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17797}
}

read the original abstract

This paper explores as didactically as possible the fundamental principles of both classical and quantum metrology, focusing on the Cram\'er-Rao Bound and how it defines the maximum precision in parameter estimation, taking into account noise and the information extracted from the data. We also conduct a detailed study of Fisher Information (both classical and quantum), showing the physical significance of this important figure of merit in metrology. We further discuss how quantum states can surpass classical limits, providing much greater precision. Examples of technological applications include the development of quantum sensors, quantum thermometers, and phase parameter estimation. Finally, we review our results on the estimation of the unknown compression parameter applied to a mode of a quantum Gaussian state.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[20]

Estudo de estados de variáveis contínuas Gaussianos e não-Gaussianos monomodais sob efeito de um canal dissipativo

DE SOUZA, Leonardo Antonio Mendes. Estudo de estados de variáveis contínuas Gaussianos e não-Gaussianos monomodais sob efeito de um canal dissipativo. Tese de doutorado, UFMG, 2009

work page 2009
[1]

A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\c{c}\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\c{c}\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas

Introdução Este artigo visa detalhar e contextualizar parte da apresentação de um dos autores na 20 a Escola Matogrossense de Física (EMF), realizada em Outubro de 2024. Como em outro trabalho apresentado na 20a EMF tratamos do uso de RPG no Ensino de Física, iniciamos esta introdução de maneira lúdica. Imagine Tyrion Lannister sendo encarregado de medir ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[2]

estima- dor

Teoria de Estimativas Clássica Em um típico problema de estimativa de parâmetros (ver Figura 2), um parâmetro desconhecido, por exemplo, θ, é introduzido no sistema. Reúnem-se, então, os dados coletados em N cópias desse sistema, por meio de medidas M apropriadas, para construir um estimador1, que chamaremos de ˆθ. Neste trabalho, não nos aprofundaremos n...

work page 2024
[3]

Postulados da Teoria Quântica Por completeza, apresentamos nesta breve seção os Postulados da Mecânica Quântica, em sua for- mulação tradicional (ver [15–18]). Os postulados da mecânica quântica, considerando tanto a abordagem por vetores de estado quanto a formulação de matriz densidade, podem ser expressos da seguinte maneira: a informação sobre o siste...

work page
[4]

próximos

Teoria de Estimativas Quântica Assim como numa estratégia de estimativa clássica, uma estratégia quântica terá passos similares, porém podemos ter acesso a recursos quânticos como estados de superposição ou Emaranhamento, e também, como visto na seção 3, a medida possui um caráter definidor quando tratamos de mecânica quântica. Sendo assim, um típico prob...

work page 2024
[5]

Estimativa do Parâmetro de Compressão num estado Gaussiano 5.1 Estados Gaussianos numa casca de noz Aqui vamos apresentar rapidamente alguns resultados sobre estados Gaussianos de um ou dois mo- dos submetidos a dinâmicas Gaussianas, que preservam a forma Gaussiana do estado [22]. Um sis- tema de variáveis contínuas (CV) de dois modosA e B, com operadores...

work page 2024
[6]

Conclusão Neste trabalho apresentamos, de uma maneira didática, os princípios fundamentais da teoria esta- tística relacionada à estimativa de parâmetros. Mostramos como a Informação de Fisher está rela- cionada à precisão na estimativa de um parâmetro desconhecido introduzido no sistema, e como a Informação de Fisher pode ser interpretada à diferença de ...

work page
[7]

Game of Thrones

BENIOFF, David, and WEISS D.B., criadores. Game of Thrones. HBO, 2011-2019

work page 2011

Show all 31 references

[8]

Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia

INMETRO. Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia. Disponível em: http://www.inmetro.gov.br. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2024

2024
[9]

Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light

AASI, Junaid et al. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nature Photonics, v. 7, n. 8, p. 613-619, 2013. CHRISTENSEN, Nelson; MEYER, Renate. Parameter estimation with gravitational waves. Reviews of modern physics, v. ...

2013
[10]

Quantum dots: Perspectives in next-generation chemical gas sensors

GALSTYAN, Vardan. “Quantum dots: Perspectives in next-generation chemical gas sensors” - A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 1152, p. 238192, 2021. Jornal Mato-Grossense de Física (JMFis) , (2024) 23

2024
[11]

QIAN, Xuanyu; JIANG, Wei; DEEN, M. Jamal. Single Photon Detectors for Automotive LiDAR Applications: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 2023

2023
[12]

Quantum imaging with undetected photons

LEMOS, Gabriela Barreto et al. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature, v. 512, n. 7515, p. 409-412, 2014

2014
[13]

Optimal probes for global quantum thermometry

MOK, Wai-Keong et al. Optimal probes for global quantum thermometry. Communications physics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 62, 2021

2021
[14]

Quantum sensors for biomedical applications

ASLAM, Nabeel et al. Quantum sensors for biomedical applications. Nature Reviews Physics, v. 5, n. 3, p. 157-169, 2023

2023
[15]

Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock

ZHANG, Chuankun et al. Frequency ratio of the 229mTh nuclear isomeric transition and the 87Sr atomic clock. Nature, v. 633, n. 8028, p. 63-70, 2024. PEIK, Ekkehard et al. Nuclear clocks for testing fundamental physics. Quantum Science and Technology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 034002, 2021

2024
[16]

Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective

TÓTH, Géza; APELLANIZ, Iagoba. Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, v. 47, n. 42, p. 424006, 2014

2014
[17]

SIMON, David S. et al. Quantum metrology. Springer International Publishing, 2017

2017
[18]

BALLESTER, M. A. Estimation of quantum states and operations. 2005. Tese de Doutorado. Ph. D. thesis, University of Utrecht

2005
[19]

Formulation of uncertainty relation between error and disturbance in quan- tum measurement by using quantum estimation theory

WATANABE, Yu. Formulation of uncertainty relation between error and disturbance in quan- tum measurement by using quantum estimation theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[21]

Introduction to quantum mechanics

GRIFFITHS, David J.; SCHROETER, Darrell F. Introduction to quantum mechanics. Cambridge university press, 2018

2018
[22]

Quantum Mechanics Volume 1

COHEN-TANNOUDJI, Claude; DIU, Bernard; LALOË, Franck. Quantum Mechanics Volume 1. Hermann, 1986

1986
[23]

Quantum mechanics

MESSIAH, Albert. Quantum mechanics. Courier Corporation, 2014

2014
[24]

Quantum computation and quantum information

NIELSEN, Michael A.; CHUANG, Isaac L. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge university press, 2010

2010
[25]

Escher, R

B. Escher, R. L. de Matos Filho, L. Davidovich, General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology, Nature Physics 7 (5) (2011) 406–411. B. Escher, R. de Matos Filho, L. Davidovich, Quantum metrology for noisy systems, Brazilian J...

2011
[26]

Classes of Gaussian states for squeezing estimation

SOUZA, Leonardo AM. Classes of Gaussian states for squeezing estimation. Physics Letters A, v. 504, p. 129431, 2024

2024
[27]

Rigovacca, A

L. Rigovacca, A. Farace, L. A. M. Souza, A. De Pasquale, V. Giovannetti, G. Adesso, Ver- satile gaussian probes for squeezing estimation, Phys. Rev. A 95 (2017) 052331. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.052331

2017 doi
[28]

Adesso, Entanglement of gaussian states (2007)

G. Adesso, Entanglement of gaussian states (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/0702069. 24 Leonardo Antônio M. Souza

2007 arXiv
[29]

Adesso, F

G. Adesso, F. Illuminati, Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (2007) 7821.doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S01

2007 doi
[30]

Xu, Quantifying coherence of gaussian states, Physical Review A 93 (3) (2016) 032111

J. Xu, Quantifying coherence of gaussian states, Physical Review A 93 (3) (2016) 032111

2016
[31]

Adesso, Gaussian interferometric power, Phys

G. Adesso, Gaussian interferometric power, Phys. Rev. A 90 (2014) 022321. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.022321

2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [20]

Estudo de estados de variáveis contínuas Gaussianos e não-Gaussianos monomodais sob efeito de um canal dissipativo

DE SOUZA, Leonardo Antonio Mendes. Estudo de estados de variáveis contínuas Gaussianos e não-Gaussianos monomodais sob efeito de um canal dissipativo. Tese de doutorado, UFMG, 2009

work page 2009

[2] [1]

A Precis\~ao da Metrologia Qu\^antica: Limite de Cram\'er-Rao, Informa\c{c}\~ao de Fisher e poss\'iveis Aplica\c{c}\~oes Tecnol\'ogicas

Introdução Este artigo visa detalhar e contextualizar parte da apresentação de um dos autores na 20 a Escola Matogrossense de Física (EMF), realizada em Outubro de 2024. Como em outro trabalho apresentado na 20a EMF tratamos do uso de RPG no Ensino de Física, iniciamos esta introdução de maneira lúdica. Imagine Tyrion Lannister sendo encarregado de medir ...

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[3] [2]

estima- dor

Teoria de Estimativas Clássica Em um típico problema de estimativa de parâmetros (ver Figura 2), um parâmetro desconhecido, por exemplo, θ, é introduzido no sistema. Reúnem-se, então, os dados coletados em N cópias desse sistema, por meio de medidas M apropriadas, para construir um estimador1, que chamaremos de ˆθ. Neste trabalho, não nos aprofundaremos n...

work page 2024

[4] [3]

Postulados da Teoria Quântica Por completeza, apresentamos nesta breve seção os Postulados da Mecânica Quântica, em sua for- mulação tradicional (ver [15–18]). Os postulados da mecânica quântica, considerando tanto a abordagem por vetores de estado quanto a formulação de matriz densidade, podem ser expressos da seguinte maneira: a informação sobre o siste...

work page

[5] [4]

próximos

Teoria de Estimativas Quântica Assim como numa estratégia de estimativa clássica, uma estratégia quântica terá passos similares, porém podemos ter acesso a recursos quânticos como estados de superposição ou Emaranhamento, e também, como visto na seção 3, a medida possui um caráter definidor quando tratamos de mecânica quântica. Sendo assim, um típico prob...

work page 2024

[6] [5]

Estimativa do Parâmetro de Compressão num estado Gaussiano 5.1 Estados Gaussianos numa casca de noz Aqui vamos apresentar rapidamente alguns resultados sobre estados Gaussianos de um ou dois mo- dos submetidos a dinâmicas Gaussianas, que preservam a forma Gaussiana do estado [22]. Um sis- tema de variáveis contínuas (CV) de dois modosA e B, com operadores...

work page 2024

[7] [6]

Conclusão Neste trabalho apresentamos, de uma maneira didática, os princípios fundamentais da teoria esta- tística relacionada à estimativa de parâmetros. Mostramos como a Informação de Fisher está rela- cionada à precisão na estimativa de um parâmetro desconhecido introduzido no sistema, e como a Informação de Fisher pode ser interpretada à diferença de ...

work page

[8] [7]

Game of Thrones

BENIOFF, David, and WEISS D.B., criadores. Game of Thrones. HBO, 2011-2019

work page 2011