Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Make-It-Animatable: An Efficient Framework for Authoring Animation-Ready 3D Characters

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single feed-forward framework rigs, skins, and re-poses any 3D humanoid character in under a second.

desk verdict Good practical auto-rigging paper with real speed and input-flexibility gains; the abstract overclaims generality, and the teacher-forcing mismatch in training needs a diagnostic the authors did not run. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18197 v3 pith:7QGSICFE submitted 2024-11-27 cs.GR cs.CV

Zhiyang Guo , Jinxu Xiang , Kai Ma , Wengang Zhou , Houqiang Li , Ran Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.GRcs.CV
keywords 3Dcharacteranimationautomaticriggingskinningweightspose-to-resttransformationparticle-basedshapeautoencoderneuralfieldGaussiansplattingstructure-awaretransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Make-It-Animatable sets out to prove that rigging, skinning, and pose normalization of a 3D humanoid character can be collapsed into one feed-forward prediction that finishes in under a second. The method takes meshes or 3D Gaussian splats — a particle-based representation used by modern 3D generators — in arbitrary poses and shapes, and outputs the three animation assets the industry needs: blend weights (per-vertex influence of each bone), a skeleton, and a pose-to-rest transformation that brings the character to a standard T-pose. This would matter because rigging and skinning are among the most labor-intensive steps in 3D content production, and existing automatic tools either need manual joint placement, only accept T- or A-poses, or are bound to realistic human body templates. The paper argues its framework handles exaggerated cartoon proportions, asymmetric designs, fine finger bones, and extra structures like ears and tails, and completes in roughly half a second where learned baselines take tens of seconds to minutes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the particle-based shape autoencoder paired with the structure-aware transformer. The autoencoder converts any point-samplable representation into a compact neural field: 32,768 surface points are downsampled by farthest point sampling and cross-attention builds 512 latent vectors that can be queried at arbitrary coordinates, which is the step that unifies meshes and 3D Gaussian splats and makes inference cost nearly independent of input particle count. A geometry-aware attention branch injects mesh normals adaptively, so semantically distant but spatially close points do not corrupt blend weights. The second pillar is structure-aware modeling: a next-child-bone prediction transformer treats each bone as a token, adds the parent bone's decoded attribute latent to the child's shape embedding, and applies masked causal attention over the kinematic tree, so deep bones are predicted conditioned on their ancestors instead of independently. The pose-to-rest output is regressed as dual quaternions, which the paper finds converges more reliably than a vanilla 6-DoF prediction, and three body-prior losses (bone connectivity, left-right symmetry, limb parallelism) keep rest poses well-formed. Conceptually, the paper frames character motion as a low-rank decomposition $D \approx B_t W_s$, so making a character animatable reduces to recovering the spatial weight matrix (the blend weights) and the temporal basis (the pose-to-rest transformations).

What would settle it

Run the framework on a curated set of bipedal characters far outside both the Mixamo training distribution and ShapeNet-like geometry — for example chibi figures whose head is half their total height, or characters with detached floating accessories — with artist-made ground-truth skeletons and weights, and measure joint IoU and Chamfer distances on those cases; if the predictions degrade to the level of the failure cases the paper itself shows in Fig. S14(b)-(c), the 'regardless of shapes and poses' claim is bounded.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the complete animation asset set of a character — K bone head-and-tail positions, a pose-to-rest transformation per bone, and per-vertex blend weights — can be read directly off a neural field encoding of the input geometry, with no template mesh, no manual annotation, and no assumption about the input pose. The framework samples the input character into a point cloud, encodes it with a frozen ShapeNet-pretrained shape autoencoder into 512 latent vectors, decodes blend weights at arbitrary surface coordinates, and decodes bone attributes from learned per-bone queries. A structure-aware transformer organizes bone decoding as next-child-bone prediction: each bone's embedding is summed with its parent's decoded latent and fused through causal masked attention down the kinematic tree, so finger and toe poses inherit the correct arm and leg context. A coarse stage localizes the skeleton from uniform samples, and a fine stage re-aligns the shape into a canonical hip-centered frame and re-samples half of its points near the hands, which is what makes fine finger bones and arbitrary global poses converge. Trained end-to-end on 95 Mixamo characters with 2,453 motion sequences, the framework reports a skeleton-matching IoU of 82.5 percent against 53.5 percent for RigNet on a shared test set, sub-second inference that barely depends on vertex count, and identical handling of mesh and Gaussian-splat inputs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a shape encoder pretrained on ShapeNet's everyday objects already has enough low-level geometry understanding for any character shape — exaggerated cartoon proportions, accessories, stylized non-human bodies — and because this encoder is frozen during training, the promise of 'any shape' holds only as far as those pretrained features transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Characters in arbitrary poses — running, seated, asymmetric — are automatically transformed into a canonical T-pose, so existing motion libraries become immediately applicable to inputs that commercial auto-riggers reject.
  • Because the input is just a point-samplable shape, meshes and 3D Gaussian splats flow through the same pipeline, so static assets from text-to-3D generators become animatable without being bound to an SMPL-like template.
  • Fine-grained finger and hand bones are produced that commercial tools like Meshy and Tripo omit, enabling expressive hand articulation.
  • New skeleton topologies cost only a fine-tune: adding extra bones such as ears and tails requires updating the final weight-decoder layer and adding learnable queries, not retraining the network.
  • Inference stays sub-second on typical meshes and around three seconds on a one-million-triangle model, so production-grade assets can be rigged at interactive speed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit: pipeline the framework directly onto the output of text-to-3D or image-to-3D generators, so every generated bipedal character ships animation-ready and 'animatable' becomes a default property of generation rather than a post-process.
  • The next-child-bone decoding scheme is a general recipe for any prediction problem with a fixed tree-structured dependency; porting it to non-bipedal skeletons (quadrupeds, winged characters) is the paper's own stated future work and would test whether the mechanism itself, rather than the human-shaped training set, carries the accuracy.
  • The frozen ShapeNet encoder is the likeliest generalization ceiling; replacing it with an encoder pretrained on stylized or cartoon character meshes is a direct, measurable upgrade that the paper's own failure cases point to.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Make-It-Animatable, a data-driven framework that takes a 3D humanoid character (mesh or 3D Gaussian splat) and, in a single forward pass, predicts blend weights, a 52-bone skeleton, and pose-to-rest transformations, thereby making the character ready for animation. The architecture combines a frozen ShapeNet-pretrained point-based shape encoder, a coarse-to-fine representation that canonicalizes the input and hierarchically samples hand regions, and a structure-aware transformer that autoregressively predicts bone attributes with causal attention along the kinematic tree. The model is trained on 95 Mixamo characters (with over 40 million effective frame samples) and fine-tuned on 35 VRoid characters with extra bones. Experiments report a large improvement over RigNet on a public MoModelsResource dataset for skeleton prediction (IoU 82.5% vs 53.5%), internal ablations on Mixamo, and qualitative comparisons with commercial and research baselines. The abstract claims that any humanoid, regardless of shape or pose, can be made animatable in less than one second.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a practically valuable contribution to automatic rigging and skinning: it unifies bones, blend weights, and pose-to-rest estimation in one fast feed-forward network, supports both meshes and 3D Gaussian splats, and handles arbitrary input poses without a standard T/A-pose requirement. The quantitative skeleton-prediction improvement over RigNet on a public test set is substantial, and the release of code and demos would facilitate reproducibility. The main weakness is that the full-pipeline quantitative evidence is limited to a small Mixamo-derived validation split, while the headline 'any humanoid, regardless of shape and pose' claim is supported only by selective qualitative results that include acknowledged failures.

major comments (5)
  1. [S2.1 and Fig. 3] There is a teacher-forcing mismatch between training and inference in the two core modules. S2.1 states that the fine stage applies canonical transformation and hierarchical sampling 'based on the ground-truth bone positions'; at inference, the coarse stage's predicted bones are used instead. Likewise, Fig. 3 shows that the structure-aware transformer encodes parent-bone latents from ground-truth attributes during training but from its own autoregressive outputs during inference. Table 3 reports no ablation that replaces predicted coarse bones with ground-truth bones or that feeds ground-truth parent attributes at decode time. Consequently, the reported joint error (2.11%) and pose error (13.6%) do not isolate the error contribution of this mismatch, and the mismatch is likely to be most severe precisely in the arbitrary poses and out-of-distribution shapes that the paper claims to support (Fig. S14). I request explicit ablations that quantify this gap.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Tables 2 and 3] The quantitative evaluation of the full pipeline (blend weights and pose transformations) is conducted only on the Mixamo validation split, which consists of roughly 4–5 characters out of the 95-character training collection. The ModelsResource-RigNetv1 test set (Table 2) is used only for skeleton-prediction metrics (IoU, precision, recall, Chamfer distances), not for blend-weight or pose errors. As a result, the paper's central generalization claim for arbitrary shapes and poses is supported by qualitative examples, which include acknowledged failure cases in Fig. S14(b)-(c). The abstract's 'any humanoid ... regardless of its shapes and poses' is stronger than the evidence presented.
  3. [Table 3] The 'percentage error' metrics for weights, joints, and poses are not defined in the main text or the supplement. Without the normalization and computation formulas, these numbers cannot be reproduced or compared across methods. Please provide explicit metric definitions, including how the percentage is computed for each asset type.
  4. [Sec. 1 and Fig. S10(d)] The abstract and Table 1 claim processing in less than one second, but Fig. S10(d) states that the Wukong model with over one million triangular faces takes 'within 3 seconds'. Since the vertex/face count strongly affects inference time, the speed claim should be conditioned on a representative input range (e.g., the 8k-vertex mesh used in Table 1) and the unconditional 'less than one second' wording should be revised.
  5. [Sec. 3.2 and Fig. S14] The paper asserts that the ShapeNet-pretrained encoder 'already has sufficient capacity for low-level geometry perception' and therefore freezes its parameters. No experiment compares freezing with fine-tuning or otherwise validates that ShapeNet features transfer to exaggerated cartoon proportions and non-human accessories. The failure cases in Fig. S14(b)-(c) are consistent with a lack of feature adaptation. Given that the encoder cannot be updated during training, the claim that the model generalizes to 'any 3D humanoid model' needs quantitative support from an ablation or a feature-level analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] Please report the exact number of characters in the Mixamo validation split; with 95 characters and a 95/5 split, the validation set is only about 4–5 characters, which is small for reliable error bars.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The paper says the geometry-aware attention is 'compatible with inputs like 3DGS in inference' but does not explain how per-point normal values are obtained for Gaussian splat inputs. Clarify this point.
  3. [Supplementary S3.1] There is a typo: 'the remaining 5% for for validation' should read 'for validation'.
  4. [Supplementary Fig. S7] The sentence 'Mixamo fails to fail to distinguish the left and right sides' contains a duplicated 'fail to'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the method is trained with direct supervision against external ground-truth animation assets and evaluated on held-out and out-of-distribution benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is supervised learning, not a self-referential construction. Section 3.5 states that the framework 'is trained in an end-to-end data-driven manner, supervised by the L1 losses with the ground-truth blend weights, bone positions, and pose-to-rest transformations, as well as the extra body prior losses.' The reported numbers in Table 3 are percentage errors against ground-truth animation assets on the Mixamo test split, and Table 2 reports quantitative comparisons on the bipedal humanoid subset of the ModelsResource-RigNetv1 dataset, which the paper states it was not trained on. The frozen shape encoder is an external pretrained network (3DShape2VecSet trained on ShapeNet), so its features are not derived from the paper's outputs. The coarse-to-fine and structure-aware components do use ground-truth bone positions and parent-bone attributes during training and predicted values during inference (Sec. S2.1 and Fig. 3); this is a conventional teacher-forcing/exposure-bias gap and a correctness risk, but it is not circular because the predicted values are themselves produced by networks trained with direct L1 supervision rather than being defined in terms of the final predictions. The low-rank dynamics framing in Sec. 3.1 and S1 is a standard linear-blend-skinning factorization used to motivate the output representation, not a derivation of the results. The only identified self-citation is CROM [13] in the related-work discussion of reduced-order modeling; it is not load-bearing for any claim. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The paper's own acknowledged failure cases (Fig. S14) are stated as limitations rather than being presented as successful predictions, and they do not reveal definitional circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a fixed skeleton topology, a frozen external encoder, and a cascade from coarse to fine joint estimates. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'particle-based autoencoder' is a network architecture, not a new entity in the physics sense.

free parameters (5)
  • Input point count N = 32768
    Number of surface points sampled from the input mesh; a hyperparameter chosen following 3DShape2VecSet, affecting capacity and speed.
  • Hierarchical sampling ratio = 50% uniform, 50% near hand joints
    Hand-set proportion of points allocated to hand regions to improve finger bone accuracy; this is an ad hoc design choice.
  • Shape latent size (M, C) = 512, 512
    Number and dimension of latent feature vectors in the neural field, inherited from 3DShape2VecSet.
  • Number of bones K = 52
    Skeleton topology from Mixamo; the method is bound to this predefined kinematic tree, and 'any' support is conditional on it.
  • Body prior loss weights = not reported
    Weights for connectivity, symmetry, and parallelism losses are not specified, so the effective objective is under-specified for replication.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The input character is a bipedal humanoid that can be aligned to a fixed 52-bone kinematic tree.
    The method trains and evaluates on Mixamo skeletons; the paper's 'any 3D humanoid model' claim depends on this alignment. Stated in Sec. 3.5 and Table 1.
  • ad hoc to paper The shape encoder pretrained on ShapeNet provides sufficient geometry features for arbitrary character shapes.
    The encoder is frozen during training; if ShapeNet features do not transfer to cartoon or fantasy shapes, the model cannot adapt. Stated in Sec. 3.2.
  • domain assumption Surface point clouds of size 32768 accurately represent the geometry of the input mesh or 3DGS.
    The model consumes a point cloud; for high-poly or thin-feature models, sampling may lose geometry. Invoked in Sec. 3.2.
  • domain assumption The canonical transformation defined by the hip and thigh joints is computable from coarse joint predictions.
    The fine stage rotates and translates the shape based on three joints; if coarse localization fails, the fine stage operates on misaligned geometry. Supplementary S2.1.
  • standard math Linear blend skinning is an adequate deformation model for the produced rigs.
    The method outputs blend weights and bones for LBS; this is a standard assumption in character animation. Sec. 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Make-It-Animatable: An Efficient Framework for Authoring Animation-Ready 3D Characters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7QGSICFE

@misc{pith2026241118197,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Make-It-Animatable: An Efficient Framework for Authoring Animation-Ready 3D Characters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7QGSICFE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18197}
}
read the original abstract

3D characters are essential to modern creative industries, but making them animatable often demands extensive manual work in tasks like rigging and skinning. Existing automatic rigging tools face several limitations, including the necessity for manual annotations, rigid skeleton topologies, and limited generalization across diverse shapes and poses. An alternative approach is to generate animatable avatars pre-bound to a rigged template mesh. However, this method often lacks flexibility and is typically limited to realistic human shapes. To address these issues, we present Make-It-Animatable, a novel data-driven method to make any 3D humanoid model ready for character animation in less than one second, regardless of its shapes and poses. Our unified framework generates high-quality blend weights, bones, and pose transformations. By incorporating a particle-based shape autoencoder, our approach supports various 3D representations, including meshes and 3D Gaussian splats. Additionally, we employ a coarse-to-fine representation and a structure-aware modeling strategy to ensure both accuracy and robustness, even for characters with non-standard skeleton structures. We conducted extensive experiments to validate our framework's effectiveness. Compared to existing methods, our approach demonstrates significant improvements in both quality and speed. More demos and code are available at https://jasongzy.github.io/Make-It-Animatable/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18197 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Given a 3D character represented by mesh or 3D Gaussian Splats with arbitrary pose and shape, our framework can produce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pipeline of the proposed framework. Given an input 3D character, we produce high-quality blend weights, bones, and pose￾to-rest transformation for it, so that any animation is within easy reach. First, we coarsely localize the joints with a pre-trained lite version of this framework, which helps enable a finer shape representation. Then the shape is encoded into a neural field with a particle-based autoencoder. The … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pipeline of the proposed structure-aware transformer. The per-bone shape-aware embedding is first added with its parent bone’s latent, which is encoded from the autoregressive outputs (in inference) or the ground-truth values (in training). The summation is then fused with the ancestral bones’ features via the masked causal attention. Eventually, bone attributes are decoded from the output shape- and structure-aware… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison with Meshy [36] and Tripo [53]. We feed them the same image as reference and compare the performance based on their generated 3D models respectively. The blend weights of two joints, i.e., Left Shoulder and Right Leg, are visualized. Given that these baselin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison with TADA [32] and HumanGaus￾sian [35] (HG). We use the generated meshes from TADA and 3D Gaussians from HG for comparison. Note that the skeletons of these two baselines are identical to the shape-specific SMPL [37] templates (without bone tail), with their…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison with RigNet [57]. We visualize the blend weights of selected joints and manually deform them to assess the impact of rigging quality on skinning results. the addition of extra bones for these accessories. We select bipedal humanoid characters from the ‘Model…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualizations of some ablative experiments. We show the effectiveness of the proposed modules and design choices by visualizing the predicted bones, blend weights, and pose transformations. perform text-to-3D-avatar generation. TADA [32] produces textured meshes and H…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IDOL: Instant Photorealistic 3D Human Creation from a Single Image

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single-image feed-forward model trains on a 100K-generated-subject multi-view dataset and reconstructs animatable 3D Gaussian human avatars in under one second.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mixamo, 2024

    Adobe. Mixamo, 2024. https://www.mixamo.com. 2, 6, 1, 3, 4, 8

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Large steps in cloth sim- ulation

    David Baraff and Andrew Witkin. Large steps in cloth sim- ulation. In ACCGI, page 43–54, New York, NY , USA, 1998. Association for Computing Machinery. 2

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Automatic rigging and ani- mation of 3D characters

    Ilya Baran and Jovan Popovi ´c. Automatic rigging and ani- mation of 3D characters. ACM TOG, 26(3):72–es, 2007. 3

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Real-time reduced large-deformation models and distributed contact for computer graphics and haptics

    Jernej Barbic. Real-time reduced large-deformation models and distributed contact for computer graphics and haptics . PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007. 2

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Real-time subspace in- tegration for st

    Jernej Barbi ˇc and Doug L James. Real-time subspace in- tegration for st. venant-kirchhoff deformable models. ACM TOG, 24(3):982–990, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Real-time large-deformation substructuring

    Jernej Barbi ˇc and Yili Zhao. Real-time large-deformation substructuring. ACM TOG, 30(4):1–8, 2011. 2

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    A finite element method for animating large vis- coplastic flow

    Adam W Bargteil, Chris Wojtan, Jessica K Hodgins, and Greg Turk. A finite element method for animating large vis- coplastic flow. ACM TOG, 26(3):16–es, 2007. 2

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Discrete elastic rods

    Mikl ´os Bergou, Max Wardetzky, Stephen Robinson, Basile Audoly, and Eitan Grinspun. Discrete elastic rods. In ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, NY , USA, 2008. Association for Computing Machinery. 2

    work page 2008

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Projective dynamics: fusing constraint projections for fast simulation

    Sofien Bouaziz, Sebastian Martin, Tiantian Liu, Ladislav Ka- van, and Mark Pauly. Projective dynamics: fusing constraint projections for fast simulation. ACM TOG, 33(4), 2014. 2

    2014

  2. [10]

    Language models are few-shot learners

    Tom B Brown. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165, 2020. 5

    2005 arXiv

  3. [11]

    ShapeNet: An information-rich 3D model repository

    Angel X Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, et al. ShapeNet: An information-rich 3D model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015. 4

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    LiCROM: Linear-subspace continuous reduced order mod- eling with neural fields

    Yue Chang, Peter Yichen Chen, Zhecheng Wang, Maur- izio M Chiaramonte, Kevin Carlberg, and Eitan Grinspun. LiCROM: Linear-subspace continuous reduced order mod- eling with neural fields. In SIGGRAPH Asia, pages 1–12,

  5. [13]

    CROM: Continuous reduced-order modeling of PDEs using implicit neural representations

    Peter Yichen Chen, Jinxu Xiang, Dong Heon Cho, Yue Chang, GA Pershing, Henrique Teles Maia, Maurizio M Chiaramonte, Kevin Carlberg, and Eitan Grinspun. CROM: Continuous reduced-order modeling of PDEs using implicit neural representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02607 ,

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Executing your commands via mo- tion diffusion in latent space

    Xin Chen, Biao Jiang, Wen Liu, Zilong Huang, Bin Fu, Tao Chen, and Gang Yu. Executing your commands via mo- tion diffusion in latent space. In CVPR, pages 18000–18010,

  7. [15]

    Deformable objects alive! ACM TOG, 31(4):1–9, 2012

    Stelian Coros, Sebastian Martin, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Christian Schumacher, Robert Sumner, and Markus Gross. Deformable objects alive! ACM TOG, 31(4):1–9, 2012. 2

    2012

  8. [16]

    A procedural approach to au- thoring solid models

    Barbara Cutler, Julie Dorsey, Leonard McMillan, Matthias M¨uller, and Robert Jagnow. A procedural approach to au- thoring solid models. ACM TOG, 21(3):302–311, 2002. 2

    2002

  9. [17]

    Neural parametric gaussians for monocular non-rigid object reconstruction

    Devikalyan Das, Christopher Wewer, Raza Yunus, Eddy Ilg, and Jan Eric Lenssen. Neural parametric gaussians for monocular non-rigid object reconstruction. In CVPR, pages 10715–10725, 2024. 1

    2024

  10. [18]

    Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3D objects

    Matt Deitke, Dustin Schwenk, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Oscar Michel, Eli VanderBilt, Ludwig Schmidt, Kiana Ehsani, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Ali Farhadi. Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3D objects. In CVPR, pages 13142– 13153, 2023. 7

    2023

  11. [19]

    Animating soft substances with implicit surfaces

    Mathieu Desbrun and Marie-Paule Gascuel. Animating soft substances with implicit surfaces. In ACCGI, page 287–290, New York, NY , USA, 1995. Association for Computing Ma- chinery. 2

    1995

  12. [20]

    Tetrahedral meshing in the wild

    Yixin Hu, Qingnan Zhou, Xifeng Gao, Alec Jacobson, De- nis Zorin, and Daniele Panozzo. Tetrahedral meshing in the wild. ACM TOG, 37(4):60, 2018. 2

    2018

  13. [21]

    DreamWaltz-G: Expressive 3D gaussian avatars from skeleton-guided 2D diffusion

    Yukun Huang, Jianan Wang, Ailing Zeng, Zheng-Jun Zha, Lei Zhang, and Xihui Liu. DreamWaltz-G: Expressive 3D gaussian avatars from skeleton-guided 2D diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17145, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    SC-GS: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes

    Yi-Hua Huang, Yang-Tian Sun, Ziyi Yang, Xiaoyang Lyu, Yan-Pei Cao, and Xiaojuan Qi. SC-GS: Sparse-controlled gaussian splatting for editable dynamic scenes. In CVPR,

  15. [23]

    MotionGPT: Human motion as a foreign language

    Biao Jiang, Xin Chen, Wen Liu, Jingyi Yu, Gang Yu, and Tao Chen. MotionGPT: Human motion as a foreign language. NeurIPS, 36, 2024. 1

    2024

  16. [24]

    The material point method for simulating continuum materials

    Chenfanfu Jiang, Craig Schroeder, Joseph Teran, Alexey Stomakhin, and Andrew Selle. The material point method for simulating continuum materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Courses, New York, NY , USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery. 2

    2016

  17. [25]

    Reusable skinning templates using cage-based deformations

    Tao Ju, Qian-Yi Zhou, Michiel Van De Panne, Daniel Cohen- Or, and Ulrich Neumann. Reusable skinning templates using cage-based deformations. ACM TOG, 27(5):1–10, 2008. 2

    2008

  18. [26]

    Interactive manipulation of large-scale crowd anima- tion

    Jongmin Kim, Yeongho Seol, Taesoo Kwon, and Jehee Lee. Interactive manipulation of large-scale crowd anima- tion. ACM TOG, 33(4):1–10, 2014. 2

    2014

  19. [27]

    Auto-rigging 3D Bipedal Characters in Arbitrary Poses

    Jeonghwan Kim, Hyeontae Son, Jinseok Bae, and Young Min Kim. Auto-rigging 3D Bipedal Characters in Arbitrary Poses. In Eurographics - Short Papers. The Euro- graphics Association, 2021. 3

    2021

  20. [28]

    MoSca: Dynamic gaussian fusion from casual videos via 4D motion scaffolds

    Jiahui Lei, Yijia Weng, Adam Harley, Leonidas Guibas, and Kostas Daniilidis. MoSca: Dynamic gaussian fusion from casual videos via 4D motion scaffolds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17421, 2024. 3, 1

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. P. Lewis, Matt Cordner, and Nickson Fong. Pose space deformation: a unified approach to shape interpolation and skeleton-driven deformation. In ACCGI, page 165–172, USA, 2000. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 2

    2000

  22. [30]

    Learning skeletal ar- ticulations with neural blend shapes.ACM TOG, 40(4):1–15,

    Peizhuo Li, Kfir Aberman, Rana Hanocka, Libin Liu, Olga Sorkine-Hornung, and Baoquan Chen. Learning skeletal ar- ticulations with neural blend shapes.ACM TOG, 40(4):1–15,

  23. [31]

    Black, Hao Li, and Javier Romero

    Tianye Li, Timo Bolkart, Michael J. Black, Hao Li, and Javier Romero. Learning a model of facial shape and ex- pression from 4D scans. ACM TOG, 36(6):194:1–194:17,

  24. [32]

    Tingting Liao, Hongwei Yi, Yuliang Xiu, Jiaxiang Tang, Yangyi Huang, Justus Thies, and Michael J. Black. TADA! Text to animatable digital avatars. In3DV, pages 1508–1519,

  25. [33]

    3D animation and automated rig- ging | Anything World, 2024

    Anything World Limited. 3D animation and automated rig- ging | Anything World, 2024. https://anything. world. 2, 4, 6, 8

    2024

  26. [34]

    Motion-X: A large- scale 3D expressive whole-body human motion dataset

    Jing Lin, Ailing Zeng, Shunlin Lu, Yuanhao Cai, Ruimao Zhang, Haoqian Wang, and Lei Zhang. Motion-X: A large- scale 3D expressive whole-body human motion dataset. NeurIPS, 2023. 1

    2023

  27. [35]

    HumanGaus- sian: Text-Driven 3D Human Generation with Gaussian Splatting

    Xian Liu, Xiaohang Zhan, Jiaxiang Tang, Ying Shan, Gang Zeng, Dahua Lin, Xihui Liu, and Ziwei Liu. HumanGaus- sian: Text-Driven 3D Human Generation with Gaussian Splatting. In CVPR, pages 6646–6657, 2024. 2, 3, 7, 8, 4, 5

    2024

  28. [36]

    Meshy - convert text and images to 3D models,

    Meshy LLC. Meshy - convert text and images to 3D models,

  29. [37]

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J. Black. SMPL: A skinned multi- person linear model. ACM TOG, 34(6):248:1–248:16, 2015. 3, 4, 7, 8, 1, 5

    2015

  30. [38]

    TARig: Adaptive template- aware neural rigging for humanoid characters

    Jing Ma and Dongliang Zhang. TARig: Adaptive template- aware neural rigging for humanoid characters. Computers & Graphics, 114:158–167, 2023. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8

    2023

  31. [39]

    Joint-dependent local deformations for hand anima- tion and object grasping

    Thalmann Magnenat, Richard Laperri `ere, and Daniel Thal- mann. Joint-dependent local deformations for hand anima- tion and object grasping. In Proceedings of Graphics Inter- face, pages 26–33. Canadian Inf. Process. Soc, 1988. 2

    1988

  32. [40]

    Vismay Modi, Nicholas Sharp, Or Perel, Shinjiro Sueda, and David I. W. Levin. Simplicits: Mesh-free, geometry-agnostic elastic simulation. ACM TOG, 43(4), 2024. 3

    2024

  33. [41]

    Smoothed particle hydrodynamics

    Joe J Monaghan. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics, 68(8):1703, 2005. 2

    2005

  34. [42]

    Point based anima- tion of elastic, plastic and melting objects

    Matthias M ¨uller, Richard Keiser, Andrew Nealen, Mark Pauly, Markus Gross, and Marc Alexa. Point based anima- tion of elastic, plastic and melting objects. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Com- puter Animation, pages 141–151, 2004. 2

    2004

  35. [43]

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed A. A. Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Expressive body capture: 3D hands, face, and body from a single image. In CVPR, pages 10975– 10985, 2019. 3, 7, 1

    2019

  36. [44]

    An implicit sph formulation for incompressible linearly elastic solids

    Andreas Peer, Christoph Gissler, Stefan Band, and Matthias Teschner. An implicit sph formulation for incompressible linearly elastic solids. In Computer Graphics Forum, pages 135–148. Wiley Online Library, 2018. 2

    2018

  37. [45]

    VRoid Studio, 2024

    pixiv Inc. VRoid Studio, 2024. https://vroid.com/ en/studio. 6, 3, 4

    2024

  38. [46]

    DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D diffusion

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Milden- hall. DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J

    Charles R. Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Point- Net++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In NeurIPS, 2017. 4

    2017

  40. [48]

    Free-form deforma- tion of solid geometric models

    Thomas W Sederberg and Scott R Parry. Free-form deforma- tion of solid geometric models. In ACCGI, pages 151–160,

  41. [49]

    Fem simulation of 3D deformable solids: a practitioner’s guide to theory, dis- cretization and model reduction

    Eftychios Sifakis and Jernej Barbic. Fem simulation of 3D deformable solids: a practitioner’s guide to theory, dis- cretization and model reduction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, New York, NY , USA, 2012. Association for Com- puting Machinery. 2

    2012

  42. [50]

    A material point method for snow simulation

    Alexey Stomakhin, Craig Schroeder, Lawrence Chai, Joseph Teran, and Andrew Selle. A material point method for snow simulation. ACM TOG, 32(4):1–10, 2013. 2

    2013

  43. [51]

    A survey on cage-based deformation of 3D models

    Daniel Str ¨oter, Jean-Marc Thiery, Kai Hormann, Jiong Chen, Qingjun Chang, Sebastian Besler, Johannes Sebas- tian Mueller-Roemer, Tamy Boubekeur, Andr ´e Stork, and Dieter W Fellner. A survey on cage-based deformation of 3D models. In Computer Graphics Forum, page e15060. Wil...

    2024

  44. [52]

    Elastically deformable models

    Demetri Terzopoulos, John Platt, Alan Barr, and Kurt Fleis- cher. Elastically deformable models. InACCGIT, pages 205– 214, 1987. 2

    1987

  45. [53]

    Tripo AI, 2024

    Tripo. Tripo AI, 2024. https://www.tripo3d.ai. 2, 6, 7, 4, 5, 8

    2024

  46. [54]

    Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, pages 5998–6008, 2017. 5

    2017

  47. [55]

    Shape of motion: 4D reconstruc- tion from a single video

    Qianqian Wang, Vickie Ye, Hang Gao, Jake Austin, Zhengqi Li, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Shape of motion: 4D reconstruc- tion from a single video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13764,

  48. [56]

    Predicting animation skeletons for 3D articulated models via volumetric nets

    Zhan Xu, Yang Zhou, Evangelos Kalogerakis, and Karan Singh. Predicting animation skeletons for 3D articulated models via volumetric nets. In 3DV, pages 298–307. IEEE,

  49. [57]

    RigNet: Neural rigging for articu- lated characters

    Zhan Xu, Yang Zhou, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Chris Lan- dreth, and Karan Singh. RigNet: Neural rigging for articu- lated characters. ACM TOG, 39(4):58:58:1–58:58:14, 2020. 2, 3, 7, 8, 4, 6

    2020

  50. [58]

    3DShape2VecSet: A 3D shape representation for neural fields and generative diffusion models.ACM TOG, 42 (4):92:1–92:16, 2023

    Biao Zhang, Jiapeng Tang, Matthias Nießner, and Peter Wonka. 3DShape2VecSet: A 3D shape representation for neural fields and generative diffusion models.ACM TOG, 42 (4):92:1–92:16, 2023. 3

    2023

  51. [59]

    ModelsResource- RigNetv1

    Wojciech Zielonka, Timo Bolkart, Thabo Beeler, and Jus- tus Thies. Gaussian eigen models for human heads. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04545, 2024. 1 10 Make-It-Animatable: An Efficient Framework for Authoring Animation-Ready 3D Characters Supplementary Material S1. Formulation o...

    2024 arXiv

  52. [2024]

    2, 6, 7, 4, 5, 8

    https://www.meshy.ai. 2, 6, 7, 4, 5, 8

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.