Celestial decomposition of Wigner's particles

Kevin Nguyen; Lorenzo Iacobacci

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Celestial decomposition of Wigner's particles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that Wigner's particles decompose, for any mass, spin, and spacetime dimension, into principal-series Lorentz representations with explicit formulas.

desk verdict Useful harmonic-analysis paper whose abstract overstates the half-integer-spin result; the massless, spinless, and spin-1/2 cases are solid, but the advertised arbitrary half-integer decomposition lacks its Plancherel measure. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19219 v3 pith:VSZDZATE submitted 2024-11-28 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Lorenzo Iacobacci , Kevin Nguyen This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 22E4622E7043A8581R0581T40

keywords WignerparticlesPoincarégroupunitaryrepresentationsLorentzprincipalcontinuousseriescelestialholographyMellintransformPlancherelmeasureconformalprimarywavefunctionsharmonicanalysisonhyperboloid

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to prove that Wigner's particles — the unitary irreducible representations of the Poincaré group labeled by mass and spin — can be decomposed completely into unitary representations of the Lorentz subgroup alone. The target is a direct integral over the principal continuous series of $SO(1,d+1)$: states labeled by a continuous scaling dimension $d/2+i\nu$ and a finite spin index. The authors give explicit formulas for the decomposition for massless and massive particles, for integer and half-integer spin, and in any spacetime dimension, together with the inner product that makes the decomposition unitary. They also show that translations mix only within the principal series, contradicting the folklore that translations force non-unitary representations. The payoff is a group-theoretic foundation for the celestial-holography dictionary between scattering amplitudes and conformal correlation functions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the elementary representation $|\Delta,\vec x\rangle_\sigma$ of $SO(1,d+1)$ from the principal continuous series, with $\Delta=d/2+i\nu$ and $\sigma$ a spin-$\ell$ index. The decomposition machinery consists of the Mellin transform for massless particles and, for massive particles, the ambient-space index-free spin-$s$ kernels $G^{(s)}_{\nu,\ell}(\hat p,W;q,Z)$ built from boundary-to-bulk propagators, together with the Plancherel-type measures $\mu(\nu)$ and $\mu_{s,\ell}(\nu)$ and the resolution-of-the-identity identities (4.55) and (4.99). The states $|\nu,\vec x\rangle$ built by these formulas are shown to transform under Lorentz with the conformal factor $\Omega(x)^\Delta$ and an $SO(d)$ rotation, which is what makes them carriers of principal-series unitary irreducible representations.

What would settle it

Compose two translation kernels of the form (3.20) on a massless principal-series state and verify that the product has the same form with translation vector equal to the sum; a failure of this associativity would disprove the claim that translations act within the principal series. Separately, attempt to determine the missing measure $\mu_{s+1/2,\ell}(\nu)$ by imposing the orthogonality relation dual to (4.99); if no positive measure exists for $s\ge 1$, formulas (4.125)–(4.126) cannot define a unitary decomposition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that any Wigner particle — any unitary irreducible representation of the Poincaré group, with mass $m\ge 0$ and (half-)integer spin $s$ — is unitarily equivalent to a direct integral of Lorentz representations from the principal continuous series of $SO(1,d+1)$, with scaling dimensions $d/2+i\nu$ and $SO(d)$ spins $\ell$ ranging from $0$ to $s$. For massless particles the decomposition is a Mellin transform over $\nu$ with unit weight; for massive particles it is realized by explicit kernels and a Plancherel measure, with the little-group tensor $V^{SO(d+1)}_s$ decomposed into the factors $V^{SO(d)}_\ell$ for $\ell=0,\dots,s$. The paper gives the inner product on the direct-integral Hilbert space and shows that it coincides with the standard Wigner momentum-space inner product, and it claims the decomposition is unique. It also shows that the unitary translation operator $U(a)=e^{-ia\cdot P}$ maps principal-series states to principal-series states through explicit mixing kernels, so the full Poincaré action is realized without leaving the unitary series.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the imported resolution-of-the-identity formulas for spinning wavefunctions hold exactly for the Wigner-particle wavefunctions in the normalizations used here, and that the resulting decomposition is unique; if either fails, the explicit formulas do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Wigner one-particle Hilbert space is unitarily equivalent to a direct integral over $\nu\in\mathbb{R}_+$ of principal-series Lorentz representations, with the Plancherel weights $\mu(\nu)$ or $\mu_{s,\ell}(\nu)$ and the associated inner product.
The celestial conformal-primary basis is not merely formal: the Lorentz inner product on the principal-series side reproduces the Wigner inner product exactly.
Unitary translations act inside the principal series through the explicit kernels (3.20) and (4.32)–(4.33), so the full Poincaré group is realized without leaving the unitary series.
For half-integer spin the decomposition is explicit for spin-$\tfrac12$ with measure $\mu_{1/2}(\nu)$, and for higher half-integer spin it is given modulo an undetermined measure $\mu_{s+1/2,\ell}(\nu)$ whose existence is assumed.
If the claimed uniqueness holds, the celestial conformal-primary basis is the canonical Lorentz decomposition of Wigner particles, fixing the dictionary between plane-wave amplitudes and conformal correlation functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One implicit consequence is that the translation kernels (3.20) and (4.32)–(4.33) define a representation of the Poincaré group on the direct-integral space; composing two such kernels and checking associativity would provide an independent consistency test that the paper does not spell out.
The same harmonic-analysis strategy should extend to continuous-spin and tachyonic representations, where the little-group representation is richer; the obstruction would appear precisely where the Lorentz boost generators act nontrivially in the inducing construction.
The undetermined measure $\mu_{s+1/2,\ell}(\nu)$ for half-integer spin $s\ge 1$ is the one place where the paper's claim is incomplete; deriving it from an orthogonality relation analogous to (4.101) would turn formulas (4.125)–(4.126) into a fully explicit unitary decomposition.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: worth reading and worth refereeing, but the abstract overstates the half-integer-spin result. The massless and massive spinless decompositions are clean, the spin-1/2 case is complete, and the explicit translation kernels are a real contribution. The advertised "arbitrary half-integer spin" formula, however, stops short in Section 4.5: the measure µ_{s+1/2,ℓ}(ν) is left undetermined, and the paper admits this. That is an internal gap, not an outside objection, and it means the abstract's central claim is not literally delivered.

What is actually new: the general-dimension massive integer-spin decomposition built on the Costa–Gonçalves–Penedones completeness relations, the spin-1/2 principal-series decomposition using the Iacobacci–Mück resolution, and the explicit formulae for how translations mix principal-series representations, (3.20) and (4.32)–(4.33). The inner-product checks—(3.18), (4.30), (4.70)—are clean, and the verification that the constructed states transform as elementary representations is done properly. It is a genuinely useful reference for the celestial holography literature.

Soft spots, in proportion: the half-integer gap is the main one. Equations (4.125)–(4.126) are a formal ansatz until µ_{s+1/2,ℓ}(ν) is known; one cannot compute inner products or transition amplitudes with it. The uniqueness assertion in the abstract is also asserted rather than proved, though that is less load-bearing. Appendix B contains a sign error in the hyperboloid parametrization (B.7): the last component should be (1−y²−|z|²)/(2y), not (1−y²+|z|²)/(2y). Minor, but worth fixing in an appendix that exists to make integrals explicit. The reliance on imported completeness relations from [38] and [28] is appropriate; those are prior theorems, and self-citation is not a problem here.

Bottom line: for massless, massive spinless, integer-spin, and spin-1/2 particles, the paper delivers. For higher half-integer spin it is honest about what is missing. Send it to review; ask the authors to either determine the measure or scale back the abstract. A serious referee will find the paper solid in its complete parts and should not reject on the strength of the gap, but the advertised generality needs to match the content.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the harmonic decomposition of Wigner's unitary irreducible representations of the Poincaré group ISO(1,d+1) into unitary irreducible representations of the Lorentz subgroup SO(1,d+1), with emphasis on the principal continuous series. For massless particles the Mellin transform gives an explicit direct-integral decomposition (Section 3), with the inner-product check (3.18) and translation kernel (3.20). For massive particles, the scalar case is treated in Section 4.1, integer spin in Section 4.3, spin-1/2 in Section 4.4, and higher half-integer spin in Section 4.5. The paper imports Plancherel-type completeness relations from [38] and [28], uses them to construct the spinning decompositions, verifies the Lorentz transformation properties of the resulting basis states, and computes translation mixing kernels. The central advertised claim, however, is only partially realized: the arbitrary half-integer spin decomposition in Section 4.5 is left with an undetermined measure.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper provides a useful group-theoretic foundation for celestial holography: it gives explicit unitary decompositions of the one-particle Hilbert space into principal-series Lorentz representations, verifies compatibility of inner products, and computes finite translation kernels. The massless Mellin decomposition and the massive scalar and integer-spin cases are explicit and technically substantial, and the finite Wigner-rotation check in Appendix A is a valuable integration of the ambient-space formalism with Wigner's construction. The authors are also honest in flagging the missing half-integer measure in Section 4.5. The main significance is therefore conditional on closing that gap, which is acknowledged as open.

major comments (3)

[4.5 (Eqs. (4.125)-(4.126))] The abstract advertises "very explicit formulae" for particles of arbitrary half-integer spin, but Section 4.5 does not deliver this. The measure μ_{s+1/2,ℓ}(ν) is introduced in (4.125) and explicitly left undetermined; the text states that the authors "have not been able to determine" it. Without this measure, (4.125) is a formal ansatz rather than an explicit decomposition: one cannot compute the Plancherel resolution, the inner product, or the transition amplitudes that the advertised uniqueness and unitarity would require. The spin-1/2 case (4.99)-(4.103) is complete, and the massless and integer-spin sections are unaffected, but the arbitrary half-integer spin claim in the abstract overreaches and should either be proved by determining μ_{s+1/2,ℓ}(ν) or be removed/qualified in both the abstract and the introduction.
[Abstract; Sections 4.3-4.5] The uniqueness claim in the abstract is not demonstrated. For the scalar and integer-spin cases, uniqueness of the Plancherel decomposition is plausible from the harmonic analysis of the symmetric space H^{d+1}, but the paper does not state or prove a precise uniqueness theorem. For the half-integer case the question of uniqueness is premature while the measure is undetermined. The authors should either prove (or cite a theorem proving) uniqueness of the direct-integral decomposition with the stated weight, or soften the wording of the abstract.
[4.3 (Eq. (4.55)); 4.4 (Eq. (4.99))] The completeness relations (4.55) and (4.99), imported from [38] and [28], are the load-bearing input for the massive spinning decompositions; the inner-product equivalences (4.70) and (4.121) inherit the normalization conventions of those references. The paper would be substantially strengthened by an explicit consistency check—for example, a low-dimensional check in d=2 or d=3 for spin 1 and spin 1/2—that these identities are compatible with the Wigner normalization (4.13), or by a precise statement of the theorem being imported. This is a correctness-risk concern rather than an assertion that the imported identities are wrong.

minor comments (5)

[4.4 (Eq. (4.123))] The right-hand side of (4.123) should read S(Λ)^{-1} Ψ±(ν, x′), not S(Λ)^{-1} Ψ±(ν, x); the subsequent equation (4.124) uses the primed argument, so this is a typographical slip.
[Appendix B (Eq. (B.1))] The sign convention in the exponential differs between (4.33), which has e^{-i m a·p}, and (B.1), which has e^{i m a·p}; the relationship should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion in the analytic continuation.
[4.2 (after Eq. (4.41))] The notation h≡d/2 is used in (4.41) before it is defined; please define h at its first use in Section 2 or immediately before (4.41).
[Throughout] There are several typos: "Restctricted" (Section 4.2), "Converseley" (Section 4.2), "respresensation" (Section 3), "transparant" (Section 4.4), and "exctract" (Section 4.4). A careful proofreading pass is needed.
[4.4-4.5] The section titles "Half spin" and "Half-integer spin" are potentially confusing; renaming them "Spin-1/2" and "Higher half-integer spin" would better reflect the content.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the decomposition derives from imported, independent harmonic-analysis identities; the undetermined half-integer-spin measure is a completeness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central decompositions are not circular. The massless Mellin decomposition (3.14)-(3.16) is a standard integral-transform identity: the principal-series wavefunctions are defined as Mellin transforms of momentum wavefunctions, and the inverse transform reproduces the original state, with the inner product consistency checked explicitly in (3.18). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. For massive integer spin, the completeness relation (4.55) and the Plancherel-type weights (4.56) are imported from Costa-Goncalves-Penedones [38], an independent and previously published derivation; the paper then checks that the resulting states transform under the Lorentz principal series. For spin-1/2, the resolution of identity (4.99) is imported from [28], which is a self-citation by one of the authors, but it is a published, independent derivation with its own explicit measure (4.100), so it constitutes real evidence rather than a circular justification. The transformation property of the spinor components is attributed to Isono [49], again external. The translation kernels (3.20), (4.32)-(4.33) are computed from the constructed bases and are consistency checks, not inputs. The abstract's uniqueness claim is asserted without proof, and the advertised explicit formulae for arbitrary half-integer spin are not fully delivered because Section 4.5 leaves the measure mu_{s+1/2,ell}(nu) undetermined ('a measure left to determine' and 'we have not been able to determine the measure'). These are genuine gaps in completeness and rigor, but they are not circular reductions: the missing measure is not being assumed and then renamed as a prediction. The self-citations are load-bearing in the sense that the paper relies on prior work by one author, but that prior work is independently derived and not equivalent to the present target result. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external harmonic-analysis results and exhibits no circularity that would inflate the score beyond a mild, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central decompositions contain no fitted parameters: all measures (4.20), (4.56), (4.100) are fixed by Plancherel theory and cited prior results. No new physical entities are postulated. The main axioms are the standard harmonic-analysis machinery and the completeness relations from [38] and [28]. The undetermined measure for general half-integer spin is a gap rather than an axiom.

assumptions (5)

standard math The principal continuous series of SO(1,d+1) with ∆ = d/2 + iν are unitary and irreducible, and together with the Plancherel measure they exhaust the relevant decomposition of L² on the mass shell.
Invoked in sections 2 and 4; this is standard harmonic analysis, but the paper does not prove completeness, relying on cited literature such as [30-32].
domain assumption The Wigner one-particle Hilbert space is identified with square-integrable wavefunctions on the mass shell with the Wigner inner products (3.8) and (4.11).
Used throughout sections 3 and 4; this is the standard physical Hilbert space for a single particle, assumed without further justification.
standard math The completeness relation (4.55) for integer-spin wavefunctions from [38] is valid and applicable to the Wigner basis.
This is the key input for the massive integer-spin decomposition in section 4.3; the paper imports it as a theorem from Costa-Gonçalves-Penedones.
standard math The resolution of the identity (4.99) for spin-1/2 from [28] is valid and applicable.
Used in section 4.4; it is a prior result by one of the present authors but is an independent published derivation, not proved again here.
standard math The spinor elementary-representation transformation law (4.124) from [49] is correct.
Cited without proof in section 4.4; the paper's derivation of fermionic principal-series states depends on this external theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Celestial decomposition of Wigner's particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VSZDZATE

@misc{pith2026241119219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Celestial decomposition of Wigner's particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VSZDZATE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19219}
}

read the original abstract

We provide a detailed decomposition of Wigner's particles, defined as unitary irreducible representations of the Poincar\'e group, in terms of unitary representations of its Lorentz subgroup. As pointed out before us, this decomposition only involves Lorentz representations belonging to the principal continuous series, and further underpins the connection between scattering amplitudes and conformal correlation functions discussed in the context of celestial holography. We provide very explicit formulae for the decomposition of particles of arbitrary mass and (half-)integer spin and for any spacetime dimension. We emphasise that this decomposition is unique and comes with a specific inner product on the corresponding Hilbert space. We also confirm that unitary translations mix Lorentz representations within the principal continuous series only, as required. Implications to the celestial holography program are indicated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Multiparticle States for the Flat Hologram
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper defines and constructs composite or multiparticle primary operators for Carrollian and celestial CFTs using OPE blocks and momentum-space partial waves, extending the flat-space dictionary beyond single-part...
Lectures on Carrollian Holography
hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

Massless scattering amplitudes, including gravitons, can be recast as correlators of a carrollian conformal field theory on null infinity, but the non-perturbative bootstrap program remains incomplete.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[38]

Costa, V

M.S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves and J.a. Penedones,Spinning AdS Propagators,JHEP09 (2014) 064 [1404.5625]

arXiv 2014
[28]

Iacobacci and W

L. Iacobacci and W. M¨ uck,Conformal Primary Basis for Dirac Spinors,Phys. Rev. D 102(2020) 106025 [2009.02938]

arXiv 2020
[1]

Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre anwendung auf die quantenmechanik der atomspektren, Braunschweig, 1931

E. Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre anwendung auf die quantenmechanik der atomspektren, Braunschweig, 1931

work page 1931
[2]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (2005)

work page 2005
[3]

Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals Math.40(1939) 149

E.P. Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals Math.40(1939) 149

work page 1939
[4]

Poland, S

D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi,The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015002 [1805.04405]

arXiv 2019
[5]

Pasterski, M

S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, in2022 Snowmass Summer Study, 11, 2021 [2111.11392]

arXiv 2021
[6]

McLoughlin, A

T. McLoughlin, A. Puhm and A.-M. Raclariu,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes chapter 11: soft theorems and celestial amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443012 [2203.13022]

arXiv 2022

Show all 53 references

[7]

Gadde,In search of conformal theories,1702.07362

A. Gadde,In search of conformal theories,1702.07362

arXiv
[8]

Joos,Zur darstellungstheorie der inhomogenen lorentzgruppe als grundlage quantenmechanischer kinematik,Protein Science10(2006) 65

H.-D. Joos,Zur darstellungstheorie der inhomogenen lorentzgruppe als grundlage quantenmechanischer kinematik,Protein Science10(2006) 65

2006
[9]

Cantoni,On the structure of the representations of the poincar´ e group with zero mass and discrete helicity,Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo24(1975) 35

V. Cantoni,On the structure of the representations of the poincar´ e group with zero mass and discrete helicity,Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo24(1975) 35

1975
[10]

Lorentz Basis

A. Chakrabarti, M. Levy-Nahas and R. Seneor,“Lorentz Basis” of the Poincar´ e Group,Journal of Mathematical Physics9(1968) 1274

1968
[11]

Chakrabarti,Lorentz basis of the poincar´ e group

A. Chakrabarti,Lorentz basis of the poincar´ e group. ii,Journal of Mathematical Physics12(1968) 1274

1968
[12]

Mukunda,Zero-mass representations of the poincar´ e group in an o(3, 1) basis, Journal of Mathematical Physics9(1968) 532

N. Mukunda,Zero-mass representations of the poincar´ e group in an o(3, 1) basis, Journal of Mathematical Physics9(1968) 532

1968
[13]

Shapiro,Expansion of the scattering amplitude in relativistic spherical functions, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics(1962)

I.S. Shapiro,Expansion of the scattering amplitude in relativistic spherical functions, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics(1962)

1962
[14]

Smith,Matrix element expansion of a spin wavefunction,Journal of Mathematical Physics19(1978) 581

G.B. Smith,Matrix element expansion of a spin wavefunction,Journal of Mathematical Physics19(1978) 581

1978
[15]

W. R¨ uhl,The convolution of fourier transforms and its application to the 37 decomposition of the momentum operator on the homogeneous lorentz group,Il Nuovo Cimento A (1971-1996)63(1969) 1131

1969
[16]

lorentz basis

A.W. Weidemann,Quantum fields in a “lorentz basis”,Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)57(1980) 221

1980
[17]

Lomont and H.E

J.S. Lomont and H.E. Moses,The representations of the inhomogeneous lorentz group in terms of an angular momentum basis,Journal of Mathematical Physics5(1964) 294

1964
[18]

MacDowell and R

W. MacDowell and R. Roskies,Reduction of the poincar´ e group with respect to the lorentz group,Journal of Mathematical Physics13(1972) 1585

1972
[19]

Chou and L.G

K.-C. Chou and L.G. Zastavenko,Integral transformations of the i. s. shapiro type for particles of zero mass, inSelected Papers of K C Chou, pp. 77–80, World Scientific
[20]

Chou and L.G

K.-C. Chou and L.G. Zastavenko,The shapiro integral transformation, inSelected Papers of K C Chou, pp. 33–38, World Scientific
[21]

Zmuidzinas,Unitary representations of the lorentz group on 4-vector manifolds, Journal of Mathematical Physics7(1966) 764

J. Zmuidzinas,Unitary representations of the lorentz group on 4-vector manifolds, Journal of Mathematical Physics7(1966) 764

1966
[22]

Steiger,Poincar´ e-irreducible tensor operators for positive-mass one-particle states

A.D. Steiger,Poincar´ e-irreducible tensor operators for positive-mass one-particle states. i,Journal of Mathematical Physics12(1971) 1497

1971
[23]

de Boer and S.N

J. de Boer and S.N. Solodukhin,A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time, Nucl. Phys.B665(2003) 545 [hep-th/0303006]

2003 arXiv
[24]

Cheung, A

C. Cheung, A. de la Fuente and R. Sundrum,4D scattering amplitudes and asymptotic symmetries from 2D CFT,JHEP01(2017) 112 [1609.00732]

2017 arXiv
[25]

Pasterski and S.-H

S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 065022 [1705.01027]

2017 arXiv
[26]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065026 [1701.00049]

2017 arXiv
[27]

Law and M

Y.T.A. Law and M. Zlotnikov,Massive Spinning Bosons on the Celestial Sphere, JHEP06(2020) 079 [2004.04309]

2020 arXiv
[29]

Narayanan,Massive Celestial Fermions,JHEP12(2020) 074 [2009.03883]

S.A. Narayanan,Massive Celestial Fermions,JHEP12(2020) 074 [2009.03883]

2020 arXiv
[30]

Barut and R

A.O. Barut and R. Raczka,Theory Of Group Representations And Applications, World Scientific, Singapore (1986). 38

1986
[31]

Dobrev, G

V.K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V.B. Petkova, S.G. Petrova and I.T. Todorov,Harmonic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Application to Conformal Quantum Field Theory, vol. 63 (1977)

1977
[32]

Chang, R

C.-M. Chang, R. Liu and W.-J. Ma,Split representation in celestial holography, 2311.08736

arXiv
[33]

Dirac,Unitary Representations of the Lorentz Group,Proc

P.A.M. Dirac,Unitary Representations of the Lorentz Group,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 183(1945) 284

1945
[34]

Harish-Chandra,Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

H. Harish-Chandra,Infinite irreducible representations of the lorentz group, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences189(1947) 372

1947
[35]

Bargmann,Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,Annals Math

V. Bargmann,Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,Annals Math. 48(1947) 568

1947
[36]

Gel’fand and M.A

I.M. Gel’fand and M.A. Naimark,Unitary representations of the lorentz group, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Matematicheskaya11(1947) 411

1947
[37]

Costa, J

M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov,Spinning Conformal Correlators,JHEP11(2011) 071 [1107.3554]

2011 arXiv
[39]

Sun,A note on the representations of SO(1, d+ 1),2111.04591

Z. Sun,A note on the representations of SO(1, d+ 1),2111.04591

arXiv
[40]

Mack and A

G. Mack and A. Salam,Finite component field representations of the conformal group, Annals Phys.53(1969) 174

1969
[41]

Langlands,On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups, inRepresentation theory and harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups, vol

R.P. Langlands,On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups, inRepresentation theory and harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups, vol. 31 ofMath. Surveys Monogr., pp. 101–170, Amer. Math. Soc. (1989)

1989
[42]

Knapp and G

A.W. Knapp and G. Zuckerman,Classification theorems for representations of semisimple lie groups, inNon-Commutative Harmonic Analysis, pp. 138–159, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1977

1977
[43]

Knapp and G.J

A.W. Knapp and G.J. Zuckerman,Classification of irreducible tempered representations of semisimple groups,Annals of Mathematics116(1982) 389

1982
[44]

Di Francesco, P

P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1997)

1997
[45]

Banerjee,Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group,JHEP 39 01(2019) 205 [1801.10171]

S. Banerjee,Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group,JHEP 39 01(2019) 205 [1801.10171]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Nguyen and P

K. Nguyen and P. West,Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography,Universe9 (2023) 385 [2305.02884]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes, JHEP01(2024) 076 [2311.09869]

K. Nguyen,Carrollian conformal correlators and massless scattering amplitudes, JHEP01(2024) 076 [2311.09869]

2024 arXiv
[48]

Bekaert and N

X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger,The unitary representations of the Poincar\’e group in any spacetime dimension,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes30(2021) 1 [hep-th/0611263]

2021 arXiv
[49]

Isono,On conformal correlators and blocks with spinors in general dimensions, Phys

H. Isono,On conformal correlators and blocks with spinors in general dimensions, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 065011 [1706.02835]

2017 arXiv
[50]

Bures, F

J. Bures, F. Sommen, V. Soucek and P.V. Lancker,Symmetric analogues of rarita–schwinger equations,Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry21(2002) 215

2002
[51]

Sleight,A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,JHEP01(2020) 090 [1906.12302]

C. Sleight,A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,JHEP01(2020) 090 [1906.12302]

2020 arXiv
[52]

Slater,Generalized Hypergeometric Functions, Cambridge University Press (2008)

L.J. Slater,Generalized Hypergeometric Functions, Cambridge University Press (2008)

2008
[53]

Iacobacci, C

L. Iacobacci, C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From celestial correlators to AdS, and back, JHEP06(2023) 053 [2208.01629]. 40

2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [38]

Costa, V

M.S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves and J.a. Penedones,Spinning AdS Propagators,JHEP09 (2014) 064 [1404.5625]

arXiv 2014

[2] [28]

Iacobacci and W

L. Iacobacci and W. M¨ uck,Conformal Primary Basis for Dirac Spinors,Phys. Rev. D 102(2020) 106025 [2009.02938]

arXiv 2020

[3] [1]

Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre anwendung auf die quantenmechanik der atomspektren, Braunschweig, 1931

E. Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre anwendung auf die quantenmechanik der atomspektren, Braunschweig, 1931

work page 1931

[4] [2]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (2005)

work page 2005

[5] [3]

Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals Math.40(1939) 149

E.P. Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Annals Math.40(1939) 149

work page 1939

[6] [4]

Poland, S

D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi,The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015002 [1805.04405]

arXiv 2019

[7] [5]

Pasterski, M

S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, in2022 Snowmass Summer Study, 11, 2021 [2111.11392]

arXiv 2021

[8] [6]

McLoughlin, A

T. McLoughlin, A. Puhm and A.-M. Raclariu,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes chapter 11: soft theorems and celestial amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443012 [2203.13022]

arXiv 2022