Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Cosmic Topological Defects from Holography

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto holographic model, axionic string loops and domain walls are two D6-brane embeddings separated by a first-order transition, and vortons are only (meta)stable when they carry baryon charge of order $\lambda$.

desk verdict First top-down D6-brane realization of cosmic string loops and vortons with a clean Chern-Simons J ~ n_B^2 relation, but stability claims rest on unchecked numerics and an unestimated probe backreaction. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19302 v2 pith:WRXMXPZI submitted 2024-11-28 hep-th hep-ph

Francesco Bigazzi , Aldo L. Cotrone , Andrea Olzi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords holographicQCDWitten-Sakai-SugimotomodelcosmicstringsdomainwallsvortonsChern-SimonstheoryD6-branesbaryoncharge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper gives a microscopic, top-down description of cosmic topological defects in an $SU(N)$ gauge theory with one flavor: in the deconfined, chirally broken phase of the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model, the axionic string loop and the axionic domain wall are realized as probe D6-branes wrapping the internal four-sphere, with a circular boundary on the flavor D8-branes. As the loop radius at the flavor-brane tip varies, the loop and wall embeddings are separated by a first-order transition, with a temperature-dependent critical radius computed numerically. Adding baryon charge and angular momentum turns the loop into a vorton, described by the $U(1)^N$ Chern-Simons theory on the D6-brane world volume, with the anyonic relation $J = (N/2) n_B^2$. The paper argues that vortons with small baryon charge ($n_B = O(\lambda^0)$) are unstable, while vortons with large charge ($n_B = O(\lambda)$) can be metastable bound states of quarks with lower free energy than an equivalent bunch of fundamental strings. A reader should care because this connects early-Universe defect physics to explicit holographic dynamics and identifies a dark-matter candidate in charged domain walls.

What carries the argument

The central object is a probe D6-brane wrapping the $S^4$ factor of the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto background, which reduces to a (2+1)-dimensional world-volume theory carrying a $U(1)^N$ Chern-Simons term from $\int F_4 \wedge a \wedge da$. The embedding profile $\rho(u)$ encodes the shape of the defect, while the world-volume gauge fields $a_t$ and $a_\psi$ encode baryon charge and angular momentum; integrating the equations of motion with the boundary condition $a_\psi(u_T)=k_t/3$ gives the load-bearing identity $J = (N/2) n_B^2$. The Dirac-Born-Infeld action plus this Chern-Simons term is what produces both the uncharged loop/wall solutions and the charged vorton solutions, and the same gauge fields are then reinterpreted as mesonic modes on the D8-branes in the effective low-energy description.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the backreaction of a charged D6-brane with $n_B \sim \lambda$ on the D8-brane world-volume and on the black-brane geometry would settle the metastability claim: if the corrected embedding admits no solution with $\rho'(u_J)=0$, the large-charge vorton does not exist. An exhaustive numerical scan of equation (3.13) over all boundary data at the horizon and at the flavor-brane tip would test the assumed loop/wall dichotomy, since a third branch crossing $l_{\rm critical}(\tilde{b})$ would change the transition picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in the $N_f=1$ Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model at finite temperature, the axionic string loop and the axionic domain wall are two distinct D6-brane embeddings with the same boundary radius $l$ on the flavor branes, and a numerical solution of the DBI equation of motion shows that the loop exists only for $l \ge l_{\rm MIN}(\tilde{b})$, the wall only for $l \le l_{\rm MAX}(\tilde{b})$, with a free-energy crossing at $l_{\rm critical}(\tilde{b})$ in the coexistence window. For charged embeddings, the world-volume Chern-Simons term enforces $J = (N/2) n_B^2$, and the paper finds that vortons with $n_B = O(\lambda^0)$ cannot be stabilized because their gauge fields are a probe correction, whereas vortons with $n_B = O(\lambda)$ admit numerical embeddings with the zero-force condition $\rho'(u_J)=0$ at the D8 tip. These large-charge vortons have smaller free energy than the corresponding configuration of free fundamental strings, making them candidate bound states of quarks. The paper is explicit about the limits of its evidence: the large-charge solutions are found numerically for intermediate temperatures, their metastability against all decay channels is not established, and the complementary D8-brane analysis is local near the tip, so the central conclusion is a numerical construction with parametric scaling rather than a proven existence theorem.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the probe-D6-brane approximation stays valid for vortons with baryon charge $n_B \sim \lambda$, where the world-volume gauge fields are large and the defect energy is comparable to a bunch of fundamental strings, so backreaction on the D8 embedding and on the background geometry can be neglected; a secondary unproven assumption is that the two numerically found embedding branches exhaust the relevant solution space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fixed temperature, string loops with tip radius below $l_{\rm critical}(\tilde{b})$ are energetically pushed toward a domain wall ending on a loop, while larger loops keep the loop configuration, so the defect network's fate depends on the loop size distribution after chiral symmetry breaking.
  • Vortons with baryon charge of order one in the 't Hooft coupling cannot be stable in this model; they shrink and decay by axion emission rather than settling at a finite radius.
  • Vortons with baryon charge of order $\lambda$ have numerical D6 embeddings satisfying the zero-force boundary condition at the flavor-brane tip, and their free energy lies below that of free fundamental strings with the same quark number, so they are energetically viable quark bound states.
  • Both the D6-brane and the local D8-brane descriptions give the scaling law $l_{\rm stable} \sim n_B/\lambda$ for the stability radius, and the D8 description provides explicit axion and vector-meson profiles for the charged loop; global existence of the large-charge solutions in curved space is not proven.
  • Charged domain walls automatically carry angular momentum $|J| = (N/2) n_B^2$ and have parametrically suppressed decay, which the paper identifies as a candidate dark-matter population ('a-baryons').

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: since the loop/wall transition is temperature dependent, the D6-loop defects themselves could act as nucleation seeds for the chiral-symmetry-breaking transition; computing the nucleation rate from the critical radius found here would be a natural extension beyond the paper.
  • Editorial inference: if large-charge vortons really are metastable quark bound states, a dark $SU(N)$ sector would host a population that decays slowly into axions and gravitational waves, producing a gravitational-wave spectrum distinct from the standard cosmic-string network; the paper does not compute this spectrum.
  • Editorial inference: the same Chern-Simons machinery implies that vortons with opposite baryon charge are realized by anti-D6-branes with $J = -(N/2) n_B^2$, so a cosmological population would contain both helicities; the paper notes the two signs but does not explore annihilation or relic asymmetries.
  • Editorial inference: the scaling law $l_{\rm stable} \sim N T_a/f_a^2$ (expressed through the axion decay constant) is a concrete prediction that could be confronted with lattice simulations of one-flavor $SU(N)$ gauge theories, searching for metastable spinning loops with the predicted radius and charge-spin relation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies cosmic topological defects in a single-flavor, large-N SU(N) gauge theory using the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model at finite temperature, in the deconfined phase with broken chiral symmetry. It proposes that straight axionic strings, axionic string loops, and axionic domain walls are described by probe D6-branes wrapped on the S4, with a circular boundary on the flavor D8-brane. The main claims are: (i) there is a first-order transition, as the boundary radius l varies, between the string-loop embedding and the domain-wall embedding, with a critical radius lcritical(~b) computed numerically; (ii) vortons, i.e. charged spinning string loops, carry baryon number nB and angular momentum J=(N/2)nB^2, with the radius scaling as l ~ nB/λ; (iii) vortons with nB=O(λ^0) are unstable, while vortons with nB=O(λ) are numerically found to be metastable and have lower free energy than a collection of free fundamental strings with the same baryon charge; (iv) the D8-brane gives an effective mesonic description of string loops and vortons, with a near-tip flat-space analysis yielding lstable ~ nB/λ. The paper is candid about several limitations, including the fact that the flat D8 analysis cannot prove existence of the vorton solutions and that the charged domain-wall stability is left to future work.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be a significant top-down holographic description of cosmic string loops, domain walls, and vortons, with concrete predictions: a Josephson-type charge-spin relation, a parametric scaling of the stability radius with nB/λ, the absence of stable vortons with O(λ^0) baryon charge, and a temperature-dependent first-order transition between string-loop and domain-wall configurations. The analytic derivation of J=(N/2)nB^2 from the Chern-Simons equations of motion in Section 3.3 is clean and is a genuine strength. The parametric derivation of l ~ nB/λ from the equations of motion and the independent rotor-model estimate are also internally consistent. The paper is honest about the points where it relies on numerics or on approximations that cannot currently be justified, and it does not overstate the D8 analysis as a complete derivation. However, the load-bearing numerical results are not reproducible as presented, and the probe-brane approximation for large-charge vortons is not quantified; these issues need to be addressed before the main claims can be fully trusted.

major comments (4)
  1. The claim that vortons with nB=O(λ) are metastable and have lower free energy than the corresponding free fundamental strings assumes that the charged D6-brane can be treated as a probe in the unperturbed WSS background and that the D8-brane embedding remains the one computed in Section 2.1. For nB~λ the world-volume gauge fields aψ and at are O(λ), so the DBI terms involving their derivatives are the same order as the embedding term; this is a self-consistent classical solution rather than a small perturbation. The paper never estimates the backreaction of the D6-brane on the D8-brane embedding or on the background geometry. A concrete check would be to compute the energy-momentum tensor of the D6 solution and compare its local energy density with the D8-brane tension and the background curvature, or to solve for the shift of the D8 tip uJ(x4) induced by the D6 source. Without such an estimate, the energy comparison Ef-strings > Evorton and the stability condition ρ'(uJ)=0 used in Section 3.3.1 are not fully justified.
  2. The first-order transition between string-loop and domain-wall embeddings is inferred from two numerically constructed solution branches of eq. (3.13). The paper states that the equation admits 'at least two solutions' but does not prove that these branches exhaust the solution space for a given boundary radius l, and the numerical solutions are presented without convergence tests, error estimates, or a reproducibility statement. Since lMIN, lMAX, and lcritical(~b) are quantitative outputs of this numerical analysis, the central claim of a first-order transition would be on firmer ground if the authors supplied a shooting/continuation analysis with controlled error and, ideally, an analytic argument for the absence of additional branches.
  3. The metastable vorton solutions with nB=O(λ) are obtained by numerically shooting from the D8-brane tip with the boundary conditions ρ'(uJ)=0, aψ(uT)=kt/3, and aψ(uJ)=-JT(~b)^{-2}+kt/3. No convergence tests, error bars, or code/data are provided, and the statement that these solutions cease to exist for very small ~b suggests a phase boundary whose location is not quantified. Because the existence of these large-charge vortons is the central stability claim of the paper, the numerical evidence needs to be made reproducible and accompanied by a check that the solutions are stable under numerical resolution and boundary-condition variation.
  4. The D8-brane analysis yields a stability radius lstable that depends on the undetermined function c in eq. (4.35), on the cutoff function y(c,~b,χ) in eq. (4.63), and on χstable from the minimization in eq. (4.68). The manuscript itself states that these quantities cannot be fixed within the approximations, so the D8 description establishes only the parametric scaling lstable ~ nB/λ and not a quantitative prediction for the stability radius. This limitation should be stated more prominently in the abstract and introduction, since the abstract promises an 'effective description of string loops and vortons in terms of mesonic modes' and the quantitative content of that description is currently a consistency check rather than a first-principles result.
minor comments (5)
  1. The dimensionless ratio ~b = uT/uJ is written with the tilde over or before the b inconsistently (e.g. '~b' and 'b~' in figures and text); please standardize the notation.
  2. The phrase 'first-order phase transition' is used for a transition between two unstable configurations; the paper already notes this in footnote 8, but the main text would benefit from reiterating that this is not an equilibrium transition between stable phases.
  3. The rotor-model estimate introduces coefficients a and b whose values are not determined; the text should state explicitly that this is a parametric consistency check, not a derivation of the proportionality constant.
  4. Some intermediate expressions, especially for d and j(~b,χ), are very long and difficult to verify; moving them to an appendix or providing a streamlined derivation would improve readability.
  5. The numerical results in Figures 5–15 would be reproducible only if the discretization, shooting method, and tolerance parameters were provided; a data-availability statement or a brief appendix with the numerical algorithm would be valuable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivations are self-contained and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from the D6-brane DBI+CS action with explicit boundary conditions and numerical solutions, not from fitting parameters to the conclusions. The J=(N/2)n_B^2 relation is presented conditionally ('provided certain boundary conditions are satisfied') and is an algebraic consequence of the boundary condition a_psi(u_T)=k_t/3, which the authors argue is forced by the stability conditions rho'(u_J)=0 and rho''(u_J)<0; this is a self-consistency analysis rather than a circular definition. The large-charge vorton solutions are constructed by imposing n_B~lambda via boundary conditions, but the complementary statement that n_B=O(lambda^0) vortons do not exist follows from a parametric analysis of the same equations, so the existence claim is not an input disguised as a prediction. The first-order transition between string-loop and domain-wall embeddings is a numerical comparison of on-shell energies of two solution branches of Eq. (3.13), not a fitted curve. Self-citations to the authors' prior work ([13], [28]) supply background results (straight axionic string, a-baryons, D6-D8 Hall-droplet systems) that are parameter-free within stated assumptions and are not used as a uniqueness theorem to forbid alternatives. The paper explicitly flags its own limitations: analytic control in the flat D8 limit is absent, metastability against decay to charged DWs is deferred to future work, and backreaction of the charged D6-brane on the D8 embedding or background is not estimated; these are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative predictions depend on several unfixed constants (c, y) and on numerical solutions without error analysis. No new fundamental particles or forces are postulated: the entities are known defects (strings, domain walls, vortons, a-baryons) realized as D6-branes, with the a-baryon concept taken from the authors' prior work [13].

free parameters (4)
  • c
    Undetermined proportionality constant in the transverse scalar solution Φ (eq. 4.35). It enters the stability radius lstable in eqs. (4.53) and (4.57), so the numerical value of lstable is not actually predicted.
  • y(c,~b,χ)
    Undetermined function parametrizing the cutoff ϵ (eqs. 4.61-4.64). It is needed to convert the near-tip flat-space minimization into a statement about the full spacetime and affects the coefficient p in eq. (4.69).
  • rotor-model coefficients a and b
    In the rotor estimate (3.41), the coefficients a and b are assumed to be O(1) and not computed. Only their λ-independence matters for the scaling lstable ~ nB/λ.
  • α(~b), slope of string loop energy vs l = 0.40 to 0.65 for ~b in 0.1 to 0.6 (approximate)
    Numerically fitted slope of the uncharged string loop energy as a function of l (figure 17). Used to estimate the cutoff in eqs. (4.62)-(4.64), not a fundamental parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The deconfined chirally-broken phase of the WSS model exists for non-antipodal D8-branes with LM_KK ≲ 0.97.
    Borrowed from Aharony-Sonnenschein-Yankielowicz [25]. The entire defect construction lives in this phase.
  • domain assumption D6-branes wrapping the S4 cycle holographically describe axionic strings, domain walls, and vortons, with a U(1)^N Chern-Simons theory on their world-volume.
    Established in the authors' earlier works [13,27,28], the paper uses this dictionary for all its defect identifications without independent derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The D6-brane probe approximation remains valid for baryon charge nB ~ λ.
    The paper does not estimate backreaction of the charged D6-brane on the D8-branes and background. This is load-bearing for the large-charge vorton solutions in section 3.3.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical solutions of the embedding equation (3.13) with the chosen boundary conditions exhaust the relevant solution space.
    The claim that only string-loop and domain-wall branches exist, and the existence boundaries lMIN and lMAX, rely on numerical exploration without a uniqueness or completeness proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmic Topological Defects from Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WRXMXPZI

@misc{pith2026241119302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmic Topological Defects from Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WRXMXPZI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19302}
}
abstract

This work investigates cosmic topological defects in gauge theories, focusing on models with an $SU(N)$ gauge group coupled with a single flavor, explored through a holographic framework. At low energies, the effective theory is described by an axion-like particle resulting from the spontaneous breaking of the axial $U(1)_A$ flavor symmetry. As the Universe cools below a critical temperature, the chiral symmetry is broken, and non-trivial vacuum configurations form, resulting in the creation of cosmic strings and domain walls. We provide a UV description of these defects in a particular holographic theory, the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model, as probe D6-branes. We show the presence of a first-order phase transition separating string loop from domain wall solutions. String loops charged under the baryon symmetry and with angular momentum - vortons - can be understood as excitations of a topological phase of matter given by a Chern-Simons theory living on the D6-brane world volume. Finally, we provide an effective description of string loops and vortons in terms of degrees of freedom living on the flavor brane, i.e. mesonic modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19302 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic picture of the chirally broken (left) and chirally symmetric (right) phases in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The D6-brane embedding for the straight axionic string is presented from the Minkowski [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pictorial representation of the D6-brane embedding describing holographically the axionic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pictorial representation of the D6-brane embedding describing the axionic domain wall [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Revolution plot around the u axis of the non-trivial embedding ρ(u) describing the string loop configuration, for ˜b = 0.1 and c0 = 1. The u variable runs from the horizon ˜b = 0.1 to the D8-brane tip at u = 1. 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 l ED6(l) (…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plots of the D6-brane free energy in the string loop phase as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Straight axionic string and string loop configurations between two types of D8-branes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Revolution plot around the u axis of the non-trivial embedding ρ(u) describing the domain wall configuration for ˜b = 0.1. The u coordinate runs from uE/uJ = 0.35, where the D6-brane has its tip, to the D8-brane tip at uJ = 1. 1 2 3 4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 l ED6(…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The D6-brane free energy of the domain wall configuration as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plots of the D6-brane free energy in the domain wall phase as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The blue line is the minimal allowed radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Analysis and comparison of the free energy balance in the string loop and DW phases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Plot of the critical radius as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Numerical solution of ˆρ for ˜b = 0.45 as function of the holographic coordinate ˆu, describing the metastable vorton configuration with large charge. The profile derivative at ˆu = 1 is zero indicating the (meta)stability of this embedding. The ˆu variable runs from …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Numerical solutions for ˆat and ˆaψ for ˜b = 0.45 as function of the holographic coordinate uˆ. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Plots of the energy contributions as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Plot of the slope α( ˜b) of the D6-brane energy for the string loop configuration as a function of l. where y(c, ˜b, χ) ∼ π 2 JT ( ˜b)α( ˜b) χ g(c, ˜b, χ). (4.64) Once again assuming that the quantity χ does not scale with λ, we get ϵ ∼ λ −1 . The coefficient y(c, ˜b,…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The first modes of Jn(ρ, x3; l) for l = 1, 9uJ /(4R3 ) = 1 and ˜b = 0.1. In order to obtain the solutions Jn(ρ, x3; l) we have to perform the Fourier transform (4.84) nu￾merically. The first modes J0, J2, J4 and J6 are shown in figure 18, for l = 1, 9uJ /(4R3 ) = 1 an…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The first modes of En(ρ, x3; l) and Fn(ρ, x3; l) for l = 1, 9uJ /(4R3 ) = 1 and ˜b = 0.1. whose solutions are Eˆ n(ρ, k, l) =    −I0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. (Anti-)Stokes Scattering on the Domain Wall String

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Meson scattering off a (2+1)-dimensional domain wall string can excite or de-excite the string's shape mode, and this paper gives the leading-order probability densities for both processes, including forward and backw...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls , Phys. Rept. 121 (1985) 263

    1985

  3. [3]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Formation and Evolution of Cosmic Strings , Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2036

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Evolution of cosmic networks , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 1131

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Carter and X

    B. Carter and X. Martin, Dynamic instability criterion for circular (Vorton) string loops , Annals Phys. 227 (1993) 151 [ hep-th/0306111]

    arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects . Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000. 55

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? , Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493

    work page 1980

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 505 [ hep-th/9803131]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD , Prog. Theor. Phys. 113 (2005) 843 [ hep-th/0412141]

    2005 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, More on a holographic dual of QCD , Prog. Theor. Phys. 114 (2005) 1083 [ hep-th/0507073]

    2005 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Antonyan, J

    E. Antonyan, J. A. Harvey, S. Jensen and D. Kutasov, NJL and QCD from string theory , hep-th/0604017

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone and A. Olzi, Axionic strings, domain walls, and baryons , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 026019 [ 2212.09783]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Tong, Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect , 6, 2016, 1606.06687

    D. Tong, Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect , 6, 2016, 1606.06687

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gaiotto, Z

    D. Gaiotto, Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, Time-reversal breaking in QCD 4, walls, and dualities in 2 + 1 dimensions , JHEP 01 (2018) 110 [ 1708.06806]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Komargodski, Baryons as Quantum Hall Droplets , 1812.09253

    Z. Komargodski, Baryons as Quantum Hall Droplets , 1812.09253

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Y.-L. Ma, M. A. Nowak, M. Rho and I. Zahed, Baryon as a Quantum Hall Droplet and the Cheshire Cat Principle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 172301 [ 1907.00958]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Karasik, Skyrmions, Quantum Hall Droplets, and one current to rule them all , SciPost Phys

    A. Karasik, Skyrmions, Quantum Hall Droplets, and one current to rule them all , SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 008 [ 2003.07893]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ma and M

    Y.-L. Ma and M. Rho, Dichotomy of Baryons as Quantum Hall Droplets and Skyrmions: Topological Structure of Dense Matter , Symmetry 13 (2021) 1888 [ 2009.09219]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Karasik, Vector dominance, one flavored baryons, and QCD domain walls from the ”hidden ” Wess-Zumino term, SciPost Phys

    A. Karasik, Vector dominance, one flavored baryons, and QCD domain walls from the ”hidden ” Wess-Zumino term, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 138 [ 2010.10544]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kitano and R

    R. Kitano and R. Matsudo, Vector mesons on the wall , JHEP 03 (2021) 023 [ 2011.14637]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nastase and J

    H. Nastase and J. Sonnenschein, Charged soliton of the three-dimensional CS+BI Abelian gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 125011 [ 2210.06581]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Lin and Y.-L

    F. Lin and Y.-L. Ma, Baryons as vortexes on the η’ domain wall , JHEP 05 (2024) 270 [2310.16438]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Rho, The Smile of Cheshire Cat At High Density , 2408.00692

    M. Rho, The Smile of Cheshire Cat At High Density , 2408.00692

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Aharony, J

    O. Aharony, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz, A Holographic model of deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration, Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 1420 [ hep-th/0604161]. 56

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A. L. Cotrone, P. Di Vecchia and A. Marzolla, The Holographic QCD Axion, JHEP 12 (2019) 056 [ 1906.12117]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Argurio, M

    R. Argurio, M. Bertolini, F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone and P. Niro, QCD domain walls, Chern-Simons theories and holography , JHEP 09 (2018) 090 [ 1806.08292]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone and A. Olzi, Hall Droplet Sheets in Holographic QCD , JHEP 02 (2023) 194 [ 2211.05147]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gabadadze and M

    G. Gabadadze and M. A. Shifman, Vacuum structure and the axion walls in gluodynamics and QCD with light quarks , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 114003 [ hep-ph/0007345]

    2000 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. M. Forbes and A. R. Zhitnitsky, Domain walls in QCD , JHEP 10 (2001) 013 [hep-ph/0008315]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, ’Nonbaryonic’ dark matter as baryonic color superconductor , JCAP 10 (2003) 010 [ hep-ph/0202161]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Liang and A

    X. Liang and A. Zhitnitsky, Axion field and the quark nugget’s formation at the QCD phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 083502 [ 1606.00435]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. L. Cotrone, A. Olzi and J. L. Raymond, Work in progress

  26. [34]

    Mateos and P

    D. Mateos and P. K. Townsend, Supertubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011602 [hep-th/0103030]

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Emparan, D

    R. Emparan, D. Mateos and P. K. Townsend, Supergravity supertubes, JHEP 07 (2001) 011 [hep-th/0106012]

    2001 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mateos, S

    D. Mateos, S. Ng and P. K. Townsend, Tachyons, supertubes and brane / anti-brane systems , JHEP 03 (2002) 016 [ hep-th/0112054]

    2002 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kruczenski, R

    M. Kruczenski, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet and D. J. Winters, Aspects of supertubes, JHEP 05 (2002) 017 [ hep-th/0204103]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bena and P

    I. Bena and P. Kraus, Three charge supertubes and black hole hair , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 046003 [hep-th/0402144]

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    I. Bena, N. Bobev, C. Ruef and N. P. Warner, Supertubes in Bubbling Backgrounds: Born-Infeld Meets Supergravity, JHEP 07 (2009) 106 [ 0812.2942]

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kobayashi, D

    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R. C. Myers and R. M. Thomson, Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density , JHEP 02 (2007) 016 [ hep-th/0611099]

    2007 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Karch and A

    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon, Metallic AdS/CFT , JHEP 09 (2007) 024 [ 0705.3870]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Fujita, W

    M. Fujita, W. Li, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Fractional Quantum Hall Effect via Holography: Chern-Simons, Edge States, and Hierarchy , JHEP 06 (2009) 066 [ 0901.0924]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Elitzur, G

    S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108. 57

    1989

  36. [44]

    Hikida, W

    Y. Hikida, W. Li and T. Takayanagi, ABJM with Flavors and FQHE , JHEP 07 (2009) 065 [0903.2194]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. Jarvinen and M. Lippert, A holographic quantum Hall model at integer filling , JHEP 05 (2011) 101 [ 1101.3329]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Floreanini and R

    R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw, Selfdual Fields as Charge Density Solitons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1873

    1987

  39. [47]

    Jackiw, K.-M

    R. Jackiw, K.-M. Lee and E. J. Weinberg, Selfdual Chern-Simons solitons , Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3488

    1990

  40. [48]

    G. V. Dunne, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi and C. A. Trugenberger, Selfdual Chern-Simons solitons and two-dimensional nonlinear equations , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1332

    1991

  41. [49]

    Banerjee and P

    R. Banerjee and P. Mukherjee, Spin of Chern-Simons vortices , Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 235 [hep-th/9605226]

    1996 arXiv

  42. [50]

    G. V. Dunne, Aspects of Chern-Simons theory , in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 69: Topological Aspects of Low-dimensional Systems , 7, 1998, hep-th/9902115

    1998 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Bolognesi and S

    S. Bolognesi and S. B. Gudnason, A Note on Chern-Simons solitons: A Type III vortex from the wall vortex , Nucl. Phys. B 805 (2008) 104 [ 0711.3803]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Hashimoto, T

    K. Hashimoto, T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Holographic Baryons: Static Properties and Form Factors from Gauge/String Duality , Prog. Theor. Phys. 120 (2008) 1093 [ 0806.3122]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Freed, J

    D. Freed, J. A. Harvey, R. Minasian and G. W. Moore, Gravitational anomaly cancellation for M theory five-branes , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 601 [ hep-th/9803205]

    1998 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Becker and M

    K. Becker and M. Becker, Five-brane gravitational anomalies , Nucl. Phys. B 577 (2000) 156 [hep-th/9911138]

    2000 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Boyarsky, J

    A. Boyarsky, J. A. Harvey and O. Ruchayskiy, A Toy model of the M5-brane: Anomalies of monopole strings in five dimensions , Annals Phys. 301 (2002) 1 [ hep-th/0203154]

    2002 arXiv

  48. [56]

    J. A. Harvey, TASI 2003 lectures on anomalies , 9, 2005, hep-th/0509097

    2003 arXiv

  49. [57]

    H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto and S. Yamato, Baryons from instantons in holographic QCD, Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) 1157 [ hep-th/0701280]

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic Press, USA, 6th ed., 2000

    2000

  51. [59]

    C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena, Brane death and dynamics from the Born-Infeld action , Nucl. Phys. B 513 (1998) 198 [ hep-th/9708147]

    1998 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Thorlacius, Born-Infeld string as a boundary conformal field theory , Phys

    L. Thorlacius, Born-Infeld string as a boundary conformal field theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1588 [ hep-th/9710181]. 58

    1998 arXiv

  53. [61]

    G. W. Gibbons, Born-Infeld particles and Dirichlet p-branes , Nucl. Phys. B 514 (1998) 603 [hep-th/9709027]

    1998 arXiv

  54. [62]

    S. Lee, A. W. Peet and L. Thorlacius, Brane waves and strings , Nucl. Phys. B 514 (1998) 161 [hep-th/9710097]

    1998 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Hashimoto, The Shape of branes pulled by strings , Phys

    A. Hashimoto, The Shape of branes pulled by strings , Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6441 [hep-th/9711097]

    1998 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bergman and G

    O. Bergman and G. Lifschytz, Holographic U(1)(A) and String Creation , JHEP 04 (2007) 043 [hep-th/0612289]

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    T. D. Brennan, S. Hong and L.-T. Wang, Coupling a Cosmic String to a TQFT , JHEP 03 (2024) 145 [ 2302.00777]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A. L. Cotrone and A. Paredes, Dark Holograms and Gravitational Waves, JHEP 04 (2021) 094 [ 2011.08757]

    2021 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, A. L. Cotrone and A. Paredes, Fate of false vacua in holographic first-order phase transitions , JHEP 12 (2020) 200 [ 2008.02579]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, T. Canneti and A. L. Cotrone, Bubble wall velocity at strong coupling , JHEP 08 (2021) 090 [ 2104.12817]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Mandal and T

    G. Mandal and T. Morita, Gregory-Laflamme as the confinement/deconfinement transition in holographic QCD, JHEP 09 (2011) 073 [ 1107.4048]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Blasi and A

    S. Blasi and A. Mariotti, Domain Walls Seeding the Electroweak Phase Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 261303 [ 2203.16450]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Blasi, R

    S. Blasi, R. Jinno, T. Konstandin, H. Rubira and I. Stomberg, Gravitational waves from defect-driven phase transitions: domain walls , JCAP 10 (2023) 051 [ 2302.06952]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Blasi and A

    S. Blasi and A. Mariotti, QCD Axion Strings or Seeds? , 2405.08060

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    R. H. Brandenberger, B. Carter, A.-C. Davis and M. Trodden, Cosmic vortons and particle physics constraints, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 6059 [ hep-ph/9605382]

    1996 arXiv

  66. [74]

    C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Vorton formation, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 7155 [hep-ph/9804378]

    1998 arXiv

  67. [75]

    C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Limits on cosmic chiral vortons , Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 43 [ hep-ph/9806480]

    1998 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Carter and A.-C

    B. Carter and A.-C. Davis, Chiral vortons and cosmological constraints on particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 123501 [ hep-ph/9910560]

    2000 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Agrawal, A

    P. Agrawal, A. Hook, J. Huang and G. Marques-Tavares, Axion string signatures: a cosmological plasma collider, JHEP 01 (2022) 103 [ 2010.15848]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai, On Stability of Fermionic Superconducting Current in Cosmic String , JHEP 05 (2021) 217 [ 2102.05412]. 59

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Y. Abe, Y. Hamada, K. Saji and K. Yoshioka, Quantum current dissipation in superconducting strings and vortons , JHEP 02 (2023) 004 [ 2209.03223]. 60

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.