Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 116 references

Cosmological Models in Lovelock Gravity: An Overview of Recent Progress

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Demanding a realistic late-time Universe constrains Lovelock gravity: a review argues that one simple requirement is enough to bound the parameters of extra-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet and cubic Lovelock cosmologies.

desk verdict A useful map of the author's own compactification results, but Table 1 contradicts Section 8 and the abstract overstates the 'always present' claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00414 v1 pith:6OSGGWV7 submitted 2024-11-30 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Sergey Pavluchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th MSC 83F0583E1583D05 PACS 04.50.-h11.25.Mj98.80.Cq
keywords LovelockgravityEinstein-Gauss-BonnetextradimensionsdynamicalcompactificationcosmologicalmodelsKasnerregimesexponentialsolutionsparameterconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a single physical requirement—that the Universe pass smoothly from the initial singularity to a low-curvature, accelerating state with three expanding dimensions and compact extra dimensions—is enough to put concrete bounds on the parameters of extra-dimensional Lovelock gravity. Across vacuum, cosmological-constant, perfect-fluid, and spatially curved models, the author surveys which transitions from high-curvature Kasner-type regimes to exponential solutions exist and which are excluded. The result is a compact set of parameter conditions under which a three-dimensional subspace expands while extra dimensions contract or stabilize, so that standard ΛCDM behavior is recovered at late times. The viability criterion is deliberately minimal: the late-time state must be an exponential solution with deceleration parameter q = -1, since all power-law asymptotes found have expansion exponents too small to give accelerated expansion.

What carries the argument

The machinery is Lovelock gravity itself—the unique ghost-free generalization of Einstein gravity whose Lagrangian is a sum of dimensionally continued Euler densities—together with the (3+D) cosmological ansatz that splits space into an isotropic three-dimensional subspace and an isotropic extra-dimensional subspace. The argument runs on the classification of asymptotic regimes: power-law Kasner-type solutions (labelled K1, K3, K5 and P(1,0)) versus exponential solutions E3+D with constant Hubble parameters. The deciding test is the deceleration parameter: exponential solutions always have q = -1, while a power-law a(t) ∝ t^p has q = -1 + 1/p and is accelerated only when p > 1, which the vacuum exponents found in the underlying analysis do not satisfy. Transitions between a high-curvature Kasner past asymptote and an exponential future asymptote are then read off phase portraits, and the parameter regions where a smooth K3 → E3+D transition exists are compiled into a table of constraints.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the vacuum Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet equations for the (3+D) ansatz with α > 0 and D = 2, scanning initial conditions in the (H, h) plane; if any trajectory reaches a late-time power-law asymptote with three-dimensional exponent p > 1 and contracting extra dimensions, then the paper's exclusion of non-exponential regimes, and hence the Table 1 constraints, would be incomplete. Alternatively, check whether the exponent bounds quoted from [95] actually satisfy 0 < pH < 1 over the full parameter range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the existence of a smooth transition from the initial singularity to a realistic low-energy regime selects a narrow set of coupling constants in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet and cubic Lovelock gravity. Realistic means: three spatial dimensions expand, all extra dimensions contract or become static, and the expansion is accelerated as in the observed Universe. Working with a (3+D)-dimensional spatially flat ansatz split into two isotropic subspaces, the review catalogues the dynamical regimes of each theory and identifies the transitions K3 → E3+D (from Gauss-Bonnet Kasner to a stable exponential solution with three expanding and D contracting dimensions) as the viable compactification channels. For vacuum EGB this requires α > 0 and D ≥ 2; with a Λ-term the allowed region is larger and depends on D through the bounds ζ1, ζ2, ζ3; for vacuum cubic Lovelock compactification occurs for all D ≥ 3 with α > 0; for perfect-fluid EGB it occurs for D = 2 with α > 0 and ω < 1/3; and with spatial curvature the extra dimensions can be stabilized for all D ≥ 3, most naturally for negative curvature. The paper concludes by intersecting these cosmological constraints with independent AdS/CFT and black-hole bounds, obtaining a combined window on αΛ.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a 'realistic low-energy regime' must be an exponential solution with deceleration parameter q = -1, so that all power-law Kasner-type late-time states are discarded; if some power-law regime with expansion exponent p > 1 actually describes the observed acceleration, the parameter constraints would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For vacuum Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, realistic compactification to an exponential state with three expanding and D contracting dimensions exists for all D ≥ 2 whenever the Gauss-Bonnet coupling α is positive.
  • Adding a cosmological constant widens the viable region: for D = 2, αΛ < 1/2; for D = 3, either α < 0 with αΛ ≤ -3/2 or α > 0 with αΛ < 1/2; for D ≥ 4, α < 0 with αΛ ≤ ζ1 or α > 0 with αΛ < ζ3.
  • In vacuum cubic Lovelock gravity, at least one realistic compactification exists for every D ≥ 3, all with α > 0; for D ≥ 8 every sign of the cubic coupling β admits some viable regime.
  • In EGB with a perfect fluid, realistic compactification occurs for D = 2, α > 0, and equation-of-state parameter ω < 1/3, with the basin of attraction growing as ω approaches 1/3 from below.
  • In spatially curved EGB models, stabilization of extra dimensions is always present for D ≥ 3; for negative curvature it is generic, while for positive curvature it requires increasingly fine-tuned parameters as D grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the q = -1 criterion were relaxed to allow any accelerated power-law asymptote with p > 1, the parameter constraints in Table 1 would shift, and some regions currently classified as non-viable, such as parts of the α < 0 vacuum EGB domain, might host realistic compactifications.
  • The review's restriction to at most one extra-dimensional subspace leaves open what happens when several distinct extra-dimensional subspaces coexist; the Bianchi-I analysis hints that higher-dimensional splittings like [4+2] compete with [3+3], so a full measure-theoretic study of basins would be needed to quantify the probability of ending in the correct splitting.
  • A direct numerical test of the paper's load-bearing assumption would be to search, in vacuum EGB with α > 0 and D ≥ 2, for initial conditions that land on a power-law asymptote with pH > 1 and contracting extra dimensions; finding one would break the stated equivalence between 'realistic' and 'exponential'.
  • Because the perfect-fluid EGB analysis is only carried out for D = 1, 2, extending it to D ≥ 3 could either confirm the ω < 1/3 boundary or reveal new constraints, changing the Table 1 entry for that model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of cosmological dynamics in extra-dimensional Lovelock gravity, specifically Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet (EGB) and vacuum cubic Lovelock models. It assembles results on vacuum, cosmological-constant, perfect-fluid, and spatial-curvature cases, with the central claim that requiring a smooth transition from an initial anisotropic high-curvature state to a realistic low-energy state—three expanding dimensions and contracting or static extra dimensions—constrains the parameters of these theories. These constraints are compiled in Table 1 and subsequently confronted with independent black-hole and AdS/CFT bounds in Section 10. The review also summarizes the totally anisotropic Bianchi-I picture, where different spatial splittings can emerge depending on dimension and initial conditions.

Significance. If the summarized constraints are correct, the paper provides a useful unified reference for dynamical compactification in Lovelock cosmology: it writes out the equations of motion for the (3+D)-splitting and curvature cases, collects the phase-plane regimes in figures, and makes the parameter constraints explicit in Table 1. The comparison with independent AdS/CFT and black-hole constraints in Section 10 is a valuable non-circular anchor. The main value is organizational, since most content is a synthesis of the author's prior publications; the novelty is modest but this is not disqualifying for a review. The reviewed results are plausible and mostly drawn from peer-reviewed sources, but the manuscript's own abstract and Table 1 contain overstatements and an internal inconsistency that need correction before the claims can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§10, Table 1 and §8] The D=4 row of Table 1 lists "γD > 0, α > 0, Λ > 0" as a case with realistic stabilization, but Section 8 states that for positive curvature of the extra dimensions in D=4, stable solutions exist only for α<0 with αΛ in (−27/54,−15/32)∪(−0.3,3/8), while the α>0 branch is the negative-curvature case with Λ<0. This is an internal contradiction in the central output of the paper; either the table's curvature/sign assignment is a typo or an undocumented exception is being introduced.
  2. [Abstract and §6] The abstract's statement that for vacuum cubic Lovelock gravity compactification "is always present" is stronger than the body of the review. In §6, for D=3–7 the realistic transition P(1,0)→E_{3+D} exists only for α>0 and μ≤μ1; for μ>μ1 the transition is P(1,0)→K1, which the paper itself describes as non-viable. For D≥8, realistic compactification exists only for α>0. The abstract should be qualified to state that realistic compactification is present for all D≥3 in an open parameter region, with the precise conditions given in the text.
  3. [§4, Eqs. (19)–(20) and deceleration-parameter discussion] The operational definition of a realistic low-energy regime is taken to be an exponential solution with q=−1, and power-law Kasner-type asymptotes are discarded. The formula q_power = −1+1/p shows that power-law solutions with p>1 are also accelerated (q<0). The paper rejects K1 because the exponents found in [95] satisfy 0<pH<1, but it does not establish that no power-law attractor with pH>1 exists in the models surveyed, including cubic Lovelock and Λ-term cases. Since the constraints in Table 1 depend on excluding all power-law asymptotes, this is a load-bearing assumption; it should either be proved for all relevant branches or explicitly declared as a definition of "realistic."
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2] There is a typo in "tje classifications by Kitaura and Wheeler"—it should read "the classifications."
  2. [§9] The word "surphases" appears in the discussion of nonstandard singularities; it should be "surfaces."
  3. [§8 and Figure 6] The caption of Figure 6 uses θ=αH0² and ξ=αΛ without defining H0; the text defines these variables only later, so the caption is not self-contained.
  4. [General] For a review claiming to set constraints, it would be helpful to include a short derivation or explicit citation-to-equation translation for the thresholds ζ1, ζ2, ζ3 and μ1, μ2, μ3 instead of only citing [98]–[101]; this would make the table easier to audit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the parameter constraints are existence conditions from the author's prior dynamical-system derivations, not fitted inputs or definitional rearrangements; summary inconsistencies are accuracy issues, not circularity.

full rationale

This is a review of the author's own research program, so self-citations are pervasive: e.g., 'The detailed analysis with all technical details could be found in [98] for D=1, 2 and in [99] for D=3 and general D≥4 cases' and 'initially this result was obtained in [99], but as it is an important milestone, we decided to reproduce it here.' However, none of the load-bearing conclusions reduces by construction to its own input. The Table 1 parameter ranges are existence conditions for E3+D exponential solutions derived in [95,98-101] from the field equations (3)-(8) under a stated (3+D) ansatz; they are not obtained by fitting a parameter to the data they later 'predict'. The choice to regard only exponential late-time attractors as 'realistic' is an explicit definition (Section 4: q_exp = -1, while q_power = -1 + 1/p), not a circular inference. The exclusion of Kasner regimes relies on the [95] result 0 < pH < 1, which is a re-derivable mathematical statement about the prior analysis rather than an assumption of the target conclusion. Section 10's reproduction of the ζ3 ≥ αΛ ≥ η2 bound transparently cites [99], and the bound has independent content from the AdS/CFT constraints used for its intersection. The abstract's 'always present' for vacuum cubic Lovelock and Table 1's D=4 curvature row conflict with Sections 6 and 8 (e.g., for D=3-7 the realistic transition requires α>0, μ≤μ1, while for μ>μ1 the future asymptote is Kasner K1 and is called non-viable), but these are internal-consistency/correctness problems, not circularity. No step in the claimed derivation chain is equivalent by definition to its own premise.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted in this review; the parameters alpha, beta, Lambda, omega, and curvature signs are theory inputs, not free parameters. The load-bearing assumptions are the realism criterion (exponential-only) and the correctness of the author's prior dynamical-system analyses.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Lovelock tensor is the unique symmetric conserved tensor depending on the metric and its first and second derivatives.
    Used in Section 1 to justify Lovelock gravity as the natural extra-dimensional extension of GR; based on refs [1-4].
  • domain assumption The (3+D) metric ansatz (5), with two isotropic subspaces, describes the relevant cosmological dynamics.
    Used throughout Sections 4-8; the fully anisotropic Bianchi-I case is considered only in Section 9 and only in low dimension.
  • ad hoc to paper A realistic late-time regime must be an exponential solution with deceleration q = -1; power-law asymptotes with exponents 0 < pH < 1 are rejected.
    Stated in Section 4 where q_power = -1 + 1/p and the claim pH < 1 from [95] excludes K1 and P(1,0) regimes; this drives Table 1.
  • domain assumption The continuity equation can be dropped for the perfect-fluid system because the full system is overdetermined.
    Section 7, paragraph after Eqs. (6)-(8); analogous to the standard treatment of Friedmann equations.
  • domain assumption The stability and phase-plane classifications reported in Sections 4-9 are correct as presented in the cited papers.
    The review does not rederive the analyses; the central constraints inherit the correctness of [95], [98]-[102], and [91].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological Models in Lovelock Gravity: An Overview of Recent Progress." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OSGGWV7

@misc{pith2026241200414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological Models in Lovelock Gravity: An Overview of Recent Progress},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OSGGWV7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00414}
}
abstract

In the current review, we provide a summary of the recent progress made in the cosmological aspect of extra-dimensional Lovelock gravity. Our review covers a wide variety of particular model/matter source combinations: Einstein--Gauss--Bonnet as well as cubic Lovelock gravities with vacuum, cosmological constant, perfect fluid, spatial curvature, and some of their combinations. Our analysis suggests that it is possible to set constraints on the parameters of the above-mentioned models from the simple requirement of the existence of a smooth transition from the initial singularity to a realistic low-energy regime. Initially, anisotropic space naturally evolves into a configuration with two isotropic subspaces, and if one of these subspaces is three-dimensional and is expanding while another is contracting, we call it realistic compactification. Of course, the process is not devoid of obstacles, and in our paper, we review the results of the compactification occurrence investigation for the above-mentioned models. In particular, for vacuum and $\Lambda$-term EGB models, compactification is not suppressed (but is not the only possible outcome either) if the number of extra dimensions is $D \geqslant 2$; for vacuum cubic Lovelock gravities it is always present (however, cubic Lovelock gravity is defined only for $D \geqslant 3$ number of extra dimensions); for the EGB model with perfect fluid it is present for $D=2$ (we have not considered this model in higher dimensions yet), and in the presence of spatial curvature, the realistic stabilization of extra dimensions is always present (however, such a model is well-defined only in $D \geqslant 4$ number of extra dimensions).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00414 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Resulting regimes for the D = 1 vacuum case: α > 0 on (a) and α < 0 on (b) (see the text for more details). Let us have a closer look at Figure 1a: within the (H > 0, h < 0) quadrant we have P(1,0) → K1 regime transition. These regimes stand for the following: P(1,0) stands for the power-law regime with pH = 1 and ph = 0, where pH and ph are Kasner exponents: pi = −H2 i /H˙ i (they characterize the power of power-la… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Resulting regimes for EGB vacuum cases: D = 2 (panel (a) for α > 0 and panel (b) for α < 0), D = 3 (panel (c) for α > 0 and panel (d) for α < 0), and general D ⩾ 4 case (panel (e) for α > 0, and panel (f) for α < 0) (see the text for more details). For accelerated expansion, we need q < 0, and for that, p > 1 is required. Apparently, all values for pH—power-law exponents corresponding to three-dimensional subspace— … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Viable regimes for D ⩾ 4 EGB cosmology with Λ-term: (a) panel: α < 0, Λ < 0 featuring K3 → K3 regime; (b) panel: α < 0, Λ > 0, αΛ ⩽ ζ1 featuring K3 → E 1 3+D ← P(1,0) transitions; (c) panel: α > 0, Λ < 0 featuring the same K3 → E 1 3+D ← P(1,0) transitions; (d) panel: α > 0, Λ > 0, αΛ < ζ2 still featuring the same K3 → E 1 3+D ← P(1,0) transitions; (e) panel: α > 0, Λ > 0, αΛ = ζ2 with K3 → E 1 3+D ← P(1,0) transiti… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Viable regimes for vacuum cubic Lovelock cosmology (all viable regimes are located in the second quadrant): (a) panel: P(1,0) → E3+D transition on the green branch for D = 3 ÷ 7 and α > 0, µ ⩽ µ1 ; (b) panel: P(1,0) → K1 transition on the green-blue branch for D = 3 ÷ …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Viable regimes for EGB model with a perfect fluid as a source: (a) panel: large-scale structure of the H > 0, h < 0 quadrant for D = 2, α > 0, ω < 0; (b) panel: vicinity of E3+2 stable point for D = 2, α > 0, ω < 0, initial conditions leading to K3 → E3+2 transition ar…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustrations for the dynamics of the EGB case with spatial curvature: regime with sta￾bilization of extra dimensions (H > 0, h → 0) on (a) panel, areas on the parameters space where stabilization of extra dimensions with positive spatial curvature is possible and stab…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustrations for the dynamics of the EGB case initial total anisotropy (Bianchi-I-type): different initial conditions for the model with 5 spatial dimensions could lead to either [3 + 2] spatial splitting ((a) panel) or isotropization ((b) panel); distribution of the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Summary of the bounds on (α, Λ) from this paper alone on (a) panel; from other considera￾tions found in the literature on (b) panel; and the intersection between them on (c) panel (see the text for more details). It is worth mentioning that initially this result was ob…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [95]

    Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions. Vacuum case. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 94, 024046. Universe 2024, 1, 0 28 of 28

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen

    Vermeil, H. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Math.-Phys. Klasse 1917, 21, 334–344

    1917

  3. [2]

    Raum, Zeit, Materie, 4th ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1921

    Weyl, H. Raum, Zeit, Materie, 4th ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1921

    1921

  4. [3]

    Sur les équations de la gravitation d’Einstein

    Cartan, E. Sur les équations de la gravitation d’Einstein. J. Math. Pure Appl. 1922, 1, 141–203

    1922

  5. [4]

    The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations

    Lovelock, D. The Einstein Tensor and Its Generalizations. J. Math. Phys. 1971, 12, 498–501

    1971

  6. [5]

    Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes

    Tipler, F.J. Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes. Phys. Lett. A 1977, 64, 8–10

    1977

  7. [6]

    Anisotropic, time-dependent solutions in maximally Gauss-Bonnet extended gravity.Nucl

    Kitaura, T.; Wheeler, J.T. Anisotropic, time-dependent solutions in maximally Gauss-Bonnet extended gravity.Nucl. Phys. B 1991, 355, 250–277

    1991

  8. [7]

    New singularity in anisotropic, time-dependent, maximally Gauss-Bonnet extended gravity.Phys

    Kitaura, T.; Wheeler, J.T. New singularity in anisotropic, time-dependent, maximally Gauss-Bonnet extended gravity.Phys. Rev. D 1993, 48, 667–672

    1993

Show all 116 references
  1. [8]

    Über die Möglichkeit, das Elektromagnetische Feld und das Gravitationsfeld zu vereiningen

    Nordström, G. Über die Möglichkeit, das Elektromagnetische Feld und das Gravitationsfeld zu vereiningen. Phys. Z. 1914, 15, 504–506

    1914

  2. [9]

    Zur Theorie der Gravitation vom Standpunkt des Relativitätsprinzips

    Nordström, G. Zur Theorie der Gravitation vom Standpunkt des Relativitätsprinzips. Ann. Phys. 1913, 347, 533–554

    1913

  3. [10]

    The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity

    Einstein, A. The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity. Ann. Phys. 1916, 49, 769–822

    1916

  4. [11]

    Zum Unitätsproblem der Physik

    Kaluza, T. Zum Unitätsproblem der Physik. Sit. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1921, K1, 966

    1921

  5. [12]

    Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie

    Klein, O. Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie. Z. Phys. 1926, 37, 895–906

    1926

  6. [13]

    The Atomicity of Electricity as a Quantum Theory Law

    Klein, O. The Atomicity of Electricity as a Quantum Theory Law. Nature 1926, 118, 516

    1926

  7. [14]

    S.Five-Dimensional Physics: Classical and Quantum Consequences of Kaluza-Klein Cosmology ; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2006

    Wesson, P . S.Five-Dimensional Physics: Classical and Quantum Consequences of Kaluza-Klein Cosmology ; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2006

    2006

  8. [15]

    The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter

    Arkani-Hamed, N.; Dimopoulos, S.; Dvali, G. The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B 1998, 429, 263–272

    1998

  9. [16]

    Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity

    Arkani-Hamed, N.; Dimopoulos, S.; Dvali, G. Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 59, 086004

    1999

  10. [17]

    Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    Randall, L.; Sundrum, R. Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 3370–3373

    1999

  11. [18]

    An Alternative to Compactification

    Randall, L.; Sundrum, R. An Alternative to Compactification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4690–4693

    1999

  12. [19]

    Ajello, M. et al. [Fermi-LAT Collaboration] Limits on large extra dimensions based on observations of neutron stars with the Fermi-LAT. JCAP 2012, 1202, 012

    2012

  13. [20]

    Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817

    Pardo, K.; Fishbach, M.; Holz, D.E.; Spergel, D.N. Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817. JCAP 2018, 1807, 048

    2018

  14. [21]

    Clark, P .J. et al. [ATLAS Collaboration] Search for microscopic black holes and string balls in final states with leptons and jets with the ATLAS detector at √s = 8 TeV .JHEP 2014, 1408, 103

    2014

  15. [22]

    Aad, G. et al. [ATLAS Collaboration] Search for strong gravity in multijet final states produced in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. JHEP 2016, 1603, 026

    2016

  16. [23]

    Dual Models for Nonhadrons

    Scherk, J.; Schwarz, J.H. Dual Models for Nonhadrons. Nucl. Phys. B 1974, 81, 118–144. Universe 2024, 1, 0 26 of 28

    1974

  17. [24]

    Alternative Constructions of Crossing-Symmetric Amplitudes with Regge Behavior

    Virasoro, M.A. Alternative Constructions of Crossing-Symmetric Amplitudes with Regge Behavior. Phys. Rev. 1969, 177, 2309

    1969

  18. [25]

    Electrostatic analog for the Virasoro model

    Shapiro, J.A. Electrostatic analog for the Virasoro model. Phys. Lett. B 1970, 33, 361–362

    1970

  19. [26]

    Vacuum configurations for superstrings

    Candelas, P .; Horowitz, G.T.; Strominger, A.; Witten, E. Vacuum configurations for superstrings. Nucl. Phys. B 1985, 258, 46–74

    1985

  20. [27]

    Heterotic String

    Gross, D.J.; Harvey, J.A.; Martinec, E.; Rohm, R. Heterotic String. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 54, 502

    1985

  21. [28]

    Curvature squared terms and string theories

    Zwiebach, B. Curvature squared terms and string theories. Phys. Lett. B 1985, 156, 315–317

    1985

  22. [29]

    A Hadrons and Nuclei

    Lanczos, C. A Hadrons and Nuclei. Z. Phys. 1932, 73, 147–168

    1932

  23. [30]

    A Remarkable Property of the Riemann-Christoffel Tensor in Four Dimensions

    Lanczos, C. A Remarkable Property of the Riemann-Christoffel Tensor in Four Dimensions. Ann. Math. 1938, 39, 842–850

    1938

  24. [31]

    Gravity theories in more than four dimensions

    Zumino, B. Gravity theories in more than four dimensions. Phys. Rep. 1986, 137, 109–114

    1986

  25. [32]

    Spontaneous compactification with quadratic and cubic curvature terms

    M ¨uller-Hoissen, F. Spontaneous compactification with quadratic and cubic curvature terms. Phys. Lett. B 1985, 163, 106–110

    1985

  26. [33]

    Lovelock gravitational field equations in cosmology

    Deruelle, N.; Fariña-Busto, L. Lovelock gravitational field equations in cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 1990, 41, 3696–3708

    1990

  27. [34]

    Dimensionally continued Euler forms: Kaluza-Klein cosmology and dimensional reduction

    M ¨uller-Hoissen, F. Dimensionally continued Euler forms: Kaluza-Klein cosmology and dimensional reduction. Class. Quant. Gravity 1986, 3, 665–677

    1986

  28. [35]

    Dynamically generated four-dimensional models in Lovelock cosmology

    Mena Marugán, G.A. Dynamically generated four-dimensional models in Lovelock cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 1992, 46, 4340

    1992

  29. [36]

    Stationary vs

    Elizalde, E.; Makarenko, A.N.; Obukhov, V .V .; Osetrin, K.E.; Filippov, A.E. Stationary vs. singular points in an accelerating FRW cosmology derived from six-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 644, 1–6

    2007

  30. [37]

    Inflation from superstring and M-theory compactification with higher order corrections

    Maeda, K.I.; Ohta, N. Inflation from superstring and M-theory compactification with higher order corrections. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 063520 (2005)

    2005

  31. [38]

    Cosmic acceleration with a negative cosmological constant in higher dimensions

    Maeda, K.I.; Ohta, N. Cosmic acceleration with a negative cosmological constant in higher dimensions. JHEP 2014, 1406, 095

    2014

  32. [39]

    String-generated gravity models

    Boulware, D.G.; Deser, S. String-generated gravity models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2656–2660

    1985

  33. [40]

    Symmetric Solutions to the Gauss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equations

    Wheeler, J.T. Symmetric Solutions to the Gauss-Bonnet Extended Einstein Equations. Nucl. Phys. B 1986, 268, 737–746

    1986

  34. [41]

    Anti-de-Sitter black hole thermodynamics in higher derivative gravity and new confining–deconfining phases in dual CFT

    Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Anti-de-Sitter black hole thermodynamics in higher derivative gravity and new confining–deconfining phases in dual CFT. Phys. Lett. B 2001, 521, 87–95 [Erratum: Phys. Lett. B 2002, 542, 301]

    2001

  35. [42]

    Friedmann-Robertson-Walker brane cosmological equations from the five-dimensional bulk (A)dS black hole

    Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Ogushi, S. Friedmann-Robertson-Walker brane cosmological equations from the five-dimensional bulk (A)dS black hole. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2002, 17, 4809–4870

    2002

  36. [43]

    Black Hole Thermodynamics and Negative Entropy in deSitter and Anti-deSitter Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Cvetic, M.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Black Hole Thermodynamics and Negative Entropy in deSitter and Anti-deSitter Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Nucl. Phys. B 2002, 628, 295–330

    2002

  37. [44]

    Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces

    Cai, R.G. Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 084014

    2002

  38. [45]

    Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Neutral case

    Torii, T.; Maeda, H. Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Neutral case. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 124002

    2005

  39. [46]

    Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Charged case

    Torii, T.; Maeda, H. Spacetime structure of static solutions in Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Charged case. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 064007

    2005

  40. [47]

    Spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein-Maxwell theory with a Gauss-Bonnet term

    Wilshire, D.L. Spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein-Maxwell theory with a Gauss-Bonnet term. Phys. Lett. B 1986, 169, 36–40

    1986

  41. [48]

    A Note on Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Lovelock Gravity

    Cai, R.G. A Note on Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Lovelock Gravity. Phys. Lett. B 2004, 582, 237–242

    2004

  42. [49]

    Exact Results for Evaporating Black Holes in Curvature-Squared Lovelock Gravity: Gauss-Bonnet Greybody Factors

    Grain, J.; Barrau, A.; Kanti, P . Exact Results for Evaporating Black Holes in Curvature-Squared Lovelock Gravity: Gauss-Bonnet Greybody Factors. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 104016

    2005

  43. [50]

    Black holes in pure Lovelock gravities

    Cai, R.G.; Ohta, N. Black holes in pure Lovelock gravities. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 74, 064001

    2006

  44. [51]

    A Lovelock black hole bestiary

    Camanho, X.O.; Edelstein, J.D. A Lovelock black hole bestiary. Class. Quant. Gravity 2013, 30, 035009

    2013

  45. [52]

    Final fate of spherically symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Maeda, H. Final fate of spherically symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 104004

    2006

  46. [53]

    Effects of Lovelock terms on the final fate of gravitational collapse: Analysis in dimensionally continued gravity

    Nozawa, M.; Maeda, H. Effects of Lovelock terms on the final fate of gravitational collapse: Analysis in dimensionally continued gravity. Class. Quant.Gravity 2006, 23, 1779–1800

    2006

  47. [54]

    Effects of Gauss–Bonnet term on the final fate of gravitational collapse

    Maeda, H. Effects of Gauss–Bonnet term on the final fate of gravitational collapse. Class. Quant. Gravity 2006, 23, 2155–2170

    2006

  48. [55]

    Asymptotically flat radiating solutions in third order Lovelock gravity

    Dehghani, M.H.; Farhangkhah, N. Asymptotically flat radiating solutions in third order Lovelock gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 064015

    2008

  49. [56]

    Shock formation in Lovelock theories

    Reall, H.S.; Tanahashi, N.; Way, B. Shock formation in Lovelock theories. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 044013

    2015

  50. [57]

    On the approach to the cosmological singularity in quadratic theories of gravity: The Kasner regimes

    Deruelle, N. On the approach to the cosmological singularity in quadratic theories of gravity: The Kasner regimes. Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 327, 253–266

    1989

  51. [58]

    General features of Bianchi-I cosmological models in Lovelock gravity

    Pavluchenko, S.A. General features of Bianchi-I cosmological models in Lovelock gravity. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 107501

    2009

  52. [59]

    A note on differences between (4+1)- and (5+1)-dimensional anisotropic cosmology in the presence of the Gauss-Bonnet term

    Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A.V . A note on differences between (4+1)- and (5+1)-dimensional anisotropic cosmology in the presence of the Gauss-Bonnet term. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2009, 24, 513–521

    2009

  53. [60]

    On anisotropic Gauss-Bonnet cosmologies in (n + 1) dimensions, governed by an n-dimensional Finslerian 4-metric

    Ivashchuk, V .D. On anisotropic Gauss-Bonnet cosmologies in (n + 1) dimensions, governed by an n-dimensional Finslerian 4-metric. Gravitat. Cosmol. 2010, 16, 118–125

    2010

  54. [61]

    On cosmological-type solutions in multi-dimensional model with Gauss-Bonnet term.Int

    Ivashchuk, V . On cosmological-type solutions in multi-dimensional model with Gauss-Bonnet term.Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2010, 7, 797–819

    2010

  55. [62]

    The nature of singularity in multidimensional anisotropic Gauss-Bonnet cosmology with a perfect fluid

    Kirnos, I.V .; Makarenko, A.N.; Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A.V . The nature of singularity in multidimensional anisotropic Gauss-Bonnet cosmology with a perfect fluid. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2010, 42, 2633–2641

    2010

  56. [63]

    The dynamics of the flat anisotropic models in the Lovelock gravity

    Pavluchenko, S.A. The dynamics of the flat anisotropic models in the Lovelock gravity. I: The even-dimensional case. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 104021

    2010

  57. [64]

    Cosmological solutions of the extended Einstein gravity with the Gauss-Bonnet term

    Ishihara, H. Cosmological solutions of the extended Einstein gravity with the Gauss-Bonnet term. Phys. Lett. B 1986, 179, 217–222. Universe 2024, 1, 0 27 of 28

    1986

  58. [65]

    Gravitat

    Kirnos, I.V .; Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A.V .; New features of flat (4+1)-dimensional cosmological model with a perfect fluid in Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Gravitat. Cosmol. 2010, 16, 274–282

    2010

  59. [66]

    On exponential cosmological type solutions in the model with Gauss-Bonnet term and variation of gravitational constant

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. On exponential cosmological type solutions in the model with Gauss-Bonnet term and variation of gravitational constant. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 177 [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 2016, 76, 584]

    2015

  60. [67]

    On exponential solutions in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmology, stability and variation of G

    Ernazarov, K.K.; Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. On exponential solutions in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmology, stability and variation of G. Gravit. Cosmol. 2016, 22, 245–250

    2016

  61. [68]

    On stable exponential solutions in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmology with zero variation ofG

    Ivashchuk, V .D. On stable exponential solutions in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmology with zero variation ofG. Gravit. Cosmol. 2016, 22, 329–332 [Erratum: Gravit. Cosmol. 2017, 23, 401]

    2016

  62. [69]

    Stable exponential cosmological solutions with zero variation of G in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with a Λ-term

    Ernazarov, K.K.; Ivashchuk, V .D. Stable exponential cosmological solutions with zero variation of G in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with a Λ-term. Eur. Phys. J. C 2017, 77, 89

    2017

  63. [70]

    Stable exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with a Λ-term

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. Stable exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with a Λ-term. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2018, 50, 119

    2018

  64. [71]

    Exact exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces of dimension m in EGB model with a Λ-term

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. Exact exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces of dimension m in EGB model with a Λ-term. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2018, 16, 1950025

    2018

  65. [72]

    Examples of Stable Exponential Cosmological Solutions with Three Factor Spaces in EGB Model with a Λ-Term

    Ernazarov, K.K.; Ivashchuk, V .D. Examples of Stable Exponential Cosmological Solutions with Three Factor Spaces in EGB Model with a Λ-Term. Gravit. Cosmol. 2019, 25, 164–168

    2019

  66. [73]

    Exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in EGB model withΛ = 0 revisited

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. Exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in EGB model withΛ = 0 revisited. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 824

    2019

  67. [74]

    Stable exponential cosmological solutions with three different Hubble-like parameters in EGB model with a Λ-term

    Ernazarov, K.K.; Ivashchuk, V .D. Stable exponential cosmological solutions with three different Hubble-like parameters in EGB model with a Λ-term. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 543

    2020

  68. [75]

    Exponential cosmological solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with two subspaces: General approach

    Pavluchenko, S. Exponential cosmological solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with two subspaces: General approach. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2104.10423

    2021 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Exact exponential solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet flat anisotropic cosmology

    Chirkov, D.; Pavluchenko, S.; Toporensky, A. Exact exponential solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet flat anisotropic cosmology. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2014, 29, 1450093

    2014

  70. [77]

    Constant volume exponential solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet flat anisotropic cosmology with a perfect fluid

    Chirkov, D.; Pavluchenko, S.; Toporensky, A. Constant volume exponential solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet flat anisotropic cosmology with a perfect fluid. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2014, 46, 1799

    2014

  71. [78]

    Note on properties of exact cosmological solutions in Lovelock gravity.Gravitat

    Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A.V . Note on properties of exact cosmological solutions in Lovelock gravity.Gravitat. Cosmol. 2014, 20, 127–131

    2014

  72. [79]

    Non-constant volume exponential solutions in higher-dimensional Lovelock cosmologies

    Chirkov, D.; Pavluchenko, S.; Toporensky, A. Non-constant volume exponential solutions in higher-dimensional Lovelock cosmologies. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2015, 47, 137

    2015

  73. [80]

    Stability analysis of the exponential solutions in Lovelock cosmologies

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Stability analysis of the exponential solutions in Lovelock cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 104017

    2015

  74. [81]

    On stability of exponential cosmological solutions with nonstatic volume factor in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet model

    Ivashchuk, V .D. On stability of exponential cosmological solutions with nonstatic volume factor in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet model. Eur. Phys. J. C 2016, 76, 431

    2016

  75. [82]

    On stable exponential cosmological solutions in the EGB model with a cosmological constant in dimensions D = 5,6,7,8

    Chirkov, D.M.; Toporensky, A.V . On stable exponential cosmological solutions in the EGB model with a cosmological constant in dimensions D = 5,6,7,8. Gravit. Cosmol. 2017, 23, 359–366

    2017

  76. [83]

    Stable exponential cosmological solutions with zero variation of GG and three different Hubble-like parameters in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet model with a Λ-term

    Ernazarov, K.K.; Ivashchuk, V .D. Stable exponential cosmological solutions with zero variation of GG and three different Hubble-like parameters in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet model with a Λ-term. Eur. Phys. J. C 2017, 77, 402

    2017

  77. [84]

    Stable exponential cosmological solutions with3- and l-dimensional factor spaces in the Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet model with a Λ-term

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. Stable exponential cosmological solutions with3- and l-dimensional factor spaces in the Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet model with a Λ-term. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 100

    2018

  78. [85]

    On stable exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in (1 + m + 2)-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with Λ-term

    Ivashchuk, V .D.; Kobtsev, A.A. On stable exponential cosmological solutions with two factor spaces in (1 + m + 2)-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet model with Λ-term. Phil. T rans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2022, 380, 20210177

    2022

  79. [86]

    Dynamical compactification in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity from geometric frustration

    Canfora, F.; Giacomini, A.; Pavluchenko, S.A. Dynamical compactification in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity from geometric frustration. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 064044

    2013

  80. [87]

    Cosmological dynamics in higher-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Canfora, F.; Giacomini, A.; Pavluchenko, S.A. Cosmological dynamics in higher-dimensional Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2014, 46, 1805

    2014

  81. [88]

    Friedmann dynamics recovered from compactified Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet cosmology

    Canfora, F.; Giacomini, A.; Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A. Friedmann dynamics recovered from compactified Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet cosmology. Gravit. Cosmol. 2018, 24, 28–38

    2018

  82. [89]

    The generality of inflation in closed cosmological models with some quintessence potentials

    Pavluchenko, S.A. The generality of inflation in closed cosmological models with some quintessence potentials. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 67, 103518

    2003

  83. [90]

    Constraints on inflation in closed universe

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Constraints on inflation in closed universe. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 69, 021301

    2004

  84. [91]

    Cosmological solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with static curved extra dimensions

    Chirkov, D.; Giacomini, A.; Pavluchenko, S.A.; Toporensky, A. Cosmological solutions in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with static curved extra dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 136

    2021

  85. [92]

    Effects of spatial curvature and anisotropy on the asymptotic regimes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Pavluchenko, S.; Toporensky, A. Effects of spatial curvature and anisotropy on the asymptotic regimes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 373

    2018

  86. [93]

    Some aspects of the cosmological dynamics in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Chirkov, D.; Pavluchenko, S.A. Some aspects of the cosmological dynamics in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2021, 36, 2150092

    2021

  87. [94]

    Spaces of Constant Curvature , 4th ed.; Publish or Perish: Wilmington, DE, USA, 1984; p

    Wolf, J.A. Spaces of Constant Curvature , 4th ed.; Publish or Perish: Wilmington, DE, USA, 1984; p. 69

    1984

  88. [96]

    Realistic Compactification Models in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Realistic Compactification Models in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity. Particles 2018, 1, 36–55

    2018

  89. [97]

    Geometrical Theorems on Einstein’s Cosmological Equations

    Kasner, E. Geometrical Theorems on Einstein’s Cosmological Equations. Am. J. Math. 1921, 43, 217–221

    1921

  90. [98]

    Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions: Low- dimensional Λ-term case

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions: Low- dimensional Λ-term case. Phys. Rev. D 2016 94, 084019

    2016

  91. [99]

    Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions: High- dimensional Λ-term case

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Cosmological dynamics of spatially flat Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet models in various dimensions: High- dimensional Λ-term case. Eur. Phys. J. C 2017, 77, 503

    2017

  92. [100]

    Realistic compactification in spatially flat vacuum cosmological models in cubic Lovelock gravity: Low- dimensional case

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Realistic compactification in spatially flat vacuum cosmological models in cubic Lovelock gravity: Low- dimensional case. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 551

    2018

  93. [101]

    Realistic compactification in spatially flat vacuum cosmological models in cubic Lovelock gravity: High- dimensional case

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Realistic compactification in spatially flat vacuum cosmological models in cubic Lovelock gravity: High- dimensional case. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 611

    2018

  94. [102]

    Dynamics of the cosmological models with perfect fluid in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity: Low-dimensional case

    Pavluchenko, S.A. Dynamics of the cosmological models with perfect fluid in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity: Low-dimensional case. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 111

    2019

  95. [103]

    Dynamic compactification with stabilized extra dimensions in cubic Lovelock gravity

    Chirkov, D.; Giacomini, A.; Toporensky, A. Dynamic compactification with stabilized extra dimensions in cubic Lovelock gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2018, 50, 98

    2018

  96. [104]

    Anisotropic cosmological dynamics in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity: An example of dynamical compactification in 7+1 dimensions

    Chirkov, D.; Giacomini, A.; Toporensky, A. Anisotropic cosmological dynamics in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity: An example of dynamical compactification in 7+1 dimensions. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2020, 52, 30

    2020

  97. [105]

    Stability Analysis of Compactification in 3rd Order Lovelock Gravity

    Chirkov, D.; Toporensky, A. Stability Analysis of Compactification in 3rd Order Lovelock Gravity. Gravit. Cosmol. 2023, 29, 262–268

    2023

  98. [106]

    Splitting into two isotropic subspaces as a result of cosmological evolution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Chirkov, D.; Toporensky, A. Splitting into two isotropic subspaces as a result of cosmological evolution in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Gravit. Cosmol. 2019, 25, 243–249

    2019

  99. [107]

    Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions

    Taub, A.H. Empty Space-Times Admitting a Three Parameter Group of Motions. Ann. Math. 1951, 53, 472–490

    1951

  100. [108]

    Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity.Phys

    Brigante, M.; Liu, H.; Myers, R.C.; Shenker, S.; Yaida, S. Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity.Phys. Rev. D 2008, 77, 126006

    2008

  101. [109]

    Viscosity Bound and Causality Violation

    Brigante, M.; Liu, H.; Myers, R.C.; Shenker, S.; Yaida, S. Viscosity Bound and Causality Violation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 191601

    2008

  102. [110]

    Causality of Holographic Hydrodynamics

    Buchel, A.; Myers, R.C. Causality of Holographic Hydrodynamics. JHEP 2009, 0908, 016

    2009

  103. [111]

    Higher Derivative Gravity, Causality and Positivity of Energy in a UV complete QFT

    Hofman, D.M. Higher Derivative Gravity, Causality and Positivity of Energy in a UV complete QFT. Nucl. Phys. B 2009, 823, 174–194

    2009

  104. [112]

    AdS_7/CFT_6, Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, and Viscosity Bound

    de Boer, J.; Kulaxizi, M.; Parnachev, A. AdS_7/CFT_6, Gauss-Bonnet Gravity, and Viscosity Bound. JHEP 2010, 1003, 087

    2010

  105. [113]

    Causality constraints in AdS/CFT from conformal collider physics and Gauss-Bonnet gravity

    Camanho, X.O.; Edelstein, J.D. Causality constraints in AdS/CFT from conformal collider physics and Gauss-Bonnet gravity. JHEP 2010, 1004, 007

    2010

  106. [114]

    Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions

    Buchel, A.; Escobedo, J.; Myers, R.C.; Paulos, M.F.; Sinha, A.; Smolkin, M. Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions. JHEP 2010, 1003, 111

    2010

  107. [115]

    Shear viscosity, instability and the upper bound of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant

    Ge, X.-H.; Sin, S.-J. Shear viscosity, instability and the upper bound of the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant. JHEP 2009, 0905, 051

    2009

  108. [116]

    Gauss-Bonnet black holes in dS spaces

    Cai, R.G.; Guo, Q. Gauss-Bonnet black holes in dS spaces. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 69, 104025. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the edit...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.