Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Unified Data Representation Learning for Non-parametric Two-sample Testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00613 v2 pith:S2NVQYGU submitted 2024-11-30 cs.LG stat.ML

A Unified Data Representation Learning for Non-parametric Two-sample Testing

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords datalearningrepresentationstesttestingdiscriminativelearnrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Learning effective data representations has been crucial in non-parametric two-sample testing. Common approaches will first split data into training and test sets and then learn data representations purely on the training set. However, recent theoretical studies have shown that, as long as the sample indexes are not used during the learning process, the whole data can be used to learn data representations, meanwhile ensuring control of Type-I errors. The above fact motivates us to use the test set (but without sample indexes) to facilitate the data representation learning in the testing. To this end, we propose a representation-learning two-sample testing (RL-TST) framework. RL-TST first performs purely self-supervised representation learning on the entire dataset to capture inherent representations (IRs) that reflect the underlying data manifold. A discriminative model is then trained on these IRs to learn discriminative representations (DRs), enabling the framework to leverage both the rich structural information from IRs and the discriminative power of DRs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RL-TST outperforms representative approaches by simultaneously using data manifold information in the test set and enhancing test power via finding the DRs with the training set.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Two-Sample Testing

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A method that produces minimal edits to source samples via diffusion autoencoder and MMD optimization, raising p-values to show statistical closeness to a target group in deep two-sample testing.

  2. A Semi-Supervised Kernel Two-Sample Test

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A semi-supervised kernel two-sample test integrates unlabeled covariate data to achieve asymptotic normality under the null, higher power than standard kernel tests, and consistency against fixed and local alternatives.