Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Non-Terrestrial Networking for 6G: Evolution, Opportunities, and Future Directions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A predictive beamforming protocol generates LEO satellite beams from a window of historical CSI, skipping the prediction step that delays conventional FDD loops.

desk verdict A solid, conventional NTN survey whose real value is organization of the literature; the few 'innovative perspectives' are qualitative sketches, and the predictive-beamforming proposal in Sec. III-C is asserted, not demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00820 v1 pith:MWETJVB4 submitted 2024-12-01 cs.NI cs.ITcs.SYeess.SPeess.SYmath.IT

Feng Wang , Shengyu Zhang , Huiting Yang , Tony Q. S. Quek This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIcs.ITcs.SYeess.SPeess.SYmath.IT
keywords Non-TerrestrialNetworksLEOsatellites6GsatellitebeamformingCSIpredictiongenerativeAImobilitymanagementnetworkslicing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that 6G non-terrestrial networking should be managed by mechanisms that exploit satellite predictability and onboard intelligence, rather than by adapting terrestrial designs. Its central proposal is a predictive beamforming protocol for FDD LEO links that generates the beamformer from the channel-state information stored over the last $T_0$ communication rounds, bypassing the separate CSI-prediction and precoder-design stages that delay conventional loops. The paper claims that using this historical window leads to better anticipation of channel variations and a more robust response to outdated CSI, which would reduce processing overhead and support continuous service as satellites move. Alongside this, it develops pre-configurable handover sequences built from predictable orbital motion, unified TN-NTN handover assessment for mobile users, and service-aware VNF placement in software-defined satellite networks. The paper's contribution is a perspective and a set of proposals, positioned for the 6G push toward unified terrestrial-satellite networks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the $T_0$-round memory window: the transmitter keeps the last $T_0$ reported CSI samples per user and feeds them to a generative model that outputs beamforming vectors directly, skipping the separate CSI-prediction stage of the conventional three-phase FDD frame. The paper names Transformer and Diffusion models as candidate generators, with an input-encoder-decoder structure that turns historical CSI (and optionally trajectory or noise) into predicted channel data. The same predictability logic appears in mobility: satellites' stable orbits let the network pre-compute ordered handover sequences, and the multi-functional time-expanded graph (MF-TEG) is introduced to model dynamic SD-NTN topology for VNF deployment and flow routing. For the central beamforming claim, the machinery is the historical-CSIT window plus generative prediction; for the broader review, it is orbital predictability exploited across access, handover, and slicing.

What would settle it

Run the proposed protocol and a conventional predict-then-precode protocol in a simulated LEO constellation with realistic satellite ephemeris, UE motion, FDD frame timing, and feedback delay, measuring per-round processing delay and achieved SINR or throughput over many handovers; if the $T_0$-round historical window does not reduce delay or improve SINR relative to the conventional loop, the paper's central claim for the protocol is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery claim is that the conventional FDD beamforming loop in LEO non-terrestrial networks can be shortened. In the standard loop, each communication round $t$ has a data phase, a control phase in which the receiver reports estimated CSI, and a processing phase in which the transmitter predicts the next CSIT and computes the beamformer; the serial dependence between prediction and processing adds delay that compounds with the receiver's feedback latency. The proposed predictive beamforming protocol instead retains the CSIT reported over the last $T_0$ rounds and generates the beamformer directly from that history, eliminating the write/read operations between the CSI-prediction module and the processing module. The paper asserts that this context-aware generation 'leads to better anticipation of channel variations, thereby providing a more robust solution' to outdated CSI, while the bounded window $T_0$ keeps storage and computation in check. Beamforming, in turn, is presented as the foundation for the paper's broader vision: seamless pre-configured handover sequences and software-defined network slicing across satellite, air, and ground segments in a unified 6G TN-NTN.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that generative AI models can autonomously produce accurate, real-time CSI predictions and beamforming vectors in highly dynamic NTN environments from incomplete or outdated information, fast enough to meet quality-of-service requirements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In FDD LEO systems, beamforming can be generated from a bounded window of historical CSIT, removing the separate CSI-prediction step and its associated write/read delay.
  • Because satellite orbits are predictable, handovers can be pre-configured as an ordered sequence of candidate satellites, reducing signaling storms and improving service continuity.
  • TN-NTN handover decisions can be made under a unified assessment that weighs SINR, time of stay, and signaling overhead, enabling seamless transitions for cars, trains, and UAVs.
  • Network slicing in SD-NTNs can place VNFs by service class—low-latency slices on HAPs or UAVs, high-throughput slices on MEO/GEO or ground data centers, and IoT slices on LEO or edge nodes—over a shared virtualized resource pool.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the historical-CSIT window works, the same memory-window principle could apply to uplink power control and to handover triggering, replacing per-decision prediction with a sliding window of past channel and trajectory data.
  • The benefit of the $T_0$-window protocol should depend on the ratio of channel coherence time to communication-round duration; a testable design rule is to set $T_0$ proportional to that ratio, which the paper does not derive.
  • The proposal sharpens a concrete research need: public benchmark datasets of LEO channel traces with realistic propagation delay, so generative CSI models can be compared against AR baselines on accuracy and inference latency.
  • Pre-configured handover sequences could be extended across heterogeneous constellations by composing per-constellation sequence predictions, an interoperability problem the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys non-terrestrial networking (NTN) for 6G, with emphasis on radio resource management, mobility management, and network slicing in software-defined NTNs. After reviewing CSI estimation, beamforming, handover, and SD-NTN slicing, the paper proposes several "innovative perspectives," the most concrete being a GenAI-empowered predictive beamforming protocol in Section III-C. The paper concludes with future research topics and open problems such as ISAC, TN-NTN competitive integration, and security in NTN slicing.

Significance. If the predictive beamforming protocol in Section III-C were validated, it could reduce CSI-processing latency and handover-related overhead in LEO NTNs, which are real problems. The survey portions are generally accurate and well organized, and the paper usefully connects 3GPP NTN evolution (Rel-15 to Rel-19) with recent research on CSI prediction, handover, and SD-NTN slicing. The reference list is extensive. However, the paper's distinctive technical claim is asserted without derivation, simulation, or comparative evaluation, and some GenAI capability statements go beyond what is currently demonstrated. The paper is therefore best viewed as a speculative position piece on top of a survey.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III-C, Fig. 3] The central claim of the proposed predictive beamforming protocol—that using the last T0 rounds of historical CSIT to generate the beamformer yields "better anticipation of channel variations" and "a more robust solution" while also saving write/read delay—is asserted without any supporting model, training procedure, complexity analysis, or simulation. This is the paper's only new technical proposal, so the claim is load-bearing. The authors should either provide a concrete generator architecture and training procedure, a latency/complexity comparison against the conventional protocol described in the same section, or a proof-of-concept simulation demonstrating the claimed robustness and delay savings. Without one of these, the advantage is not established.
  2. [Section III-A and Section III-B] The manuscript states that GenAI models "can autonomously generate optimized beamforming vectors" and "dynamically generate predictive CSI estimates" that keep resource allocation based on up-to-date information, even in the absence of complete or up-to-date data. No evidence, reference, or simulation is provided to show that generative models can produce accurate enough outputs within the latency constraints of LEO NTNs. These statements should either be supported by quantitative evidence or explicitly reframed as open research hypotheses rather than established capabilities.
  3. [Section III-C] There is an internal tension in the proposed protocol: the paper motivates GenAI-based beamforming by the need to avoid outdated CSI, yet the protocol feeds the generator with historical CSIT that is up to T0 communication rounds old. The authors do not relate T0 to the channel coherence time, satellite pass duration, or beamforming update interval, and they do not argue that a generative model can extrapolate beyond the coherence time. If the channel decorrelates within one or two rounds, the older historical samples could add noise rather than context. This issue must be addressed explicitly before the claimed robustness can be accepted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section I-A] The text refers to "Rrel-19"; this should be "Rel-19."
  2. [Throughout] The abbreviation "UA Vs" is inconsistently spaced; it should be uniformly rendered as "UAVs."
  3. [Figures 5 and 6] Figures 5 and 6 contain garbled non-English annotations and stray symbols that obscure the intended architecture diagrams; these figures should be redrawn with clean English labels.
  4. [References] Several references, including [76] and [85], lack complete bibliographic information (venue, page numbers, or year); these should be checked and completed.
  5. [Section III-C, footnote 1] The footnote states that T0 bounds storage and computational complexity, but no guidance is given for how T0 should be chosen relative to channel dynamics; a short discussion or example value would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a survey and position paper with qualitative proposals, no fitted parameters, no derived equations, and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper does not contain a derivational chain whose output could reduce to its inputs. Section III-C's predictive beamforming protocol proposes using the last T0 reported CSIT entries to generate a beamformer, but it defines no objective function, fits no parameters, and derives no equation. The assertion that this 'leads to better anticipation of channel variations' is an unsupported qualitative claim, not a prediction forced by construction. Self-citations such as [38], [67], [99], and [110] appear in survey or background contexts and are not invoked as uniqueness theorems, as the sole justification for the paper's proposals, or as substitutes for derived results. The paper also does not rename a known result: CSI prediction and beamforming techniques are explicitly attributed to prior literature. The skeptic's concern that no evidence or simulation supports the GenAI accuracy and latency assumptions is a correctness and evidence risk, not a circularity failure. Accordingly, no circular step is present and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard domain assumptions about LEO satellite predictability and an unvalidated conjecture about GenAI's capabilities. No new entities or fitted parameters are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Channel conditions, including user deployment and channel coefficients, remain constant within each communication round.
    Stated in Section III-C as part of the FDD system model for the predictive beamforming protocol.
  • ad hoc to paper GenAI models can generate accurate, real-time CSI and beamforming vectors without up-to-date information.
    Invoked in Section III-A and III-C; no evidence is provided.
  • domain assumption Satellites on the same orbit pass over a target area in sequence with similar signal quality changes, enabling pre-configurable handover sequences.
    Assumed in Section IV-A.2 and IV-B to justify location-based CHO and pre-configured handover.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-Terrestrial Networking for 6G: Evolution, Opportunities, and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MWETJVB4

@misc{pith2026241200820,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-Terrestrial Networking for 6G: Evolution, Opportunities, and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MWETJVB4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00820}
}
read the original abstract

From 5G onwards, Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs) have emerged as a key component of future network architectures. Leveraging Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations, NTNs are capable of building a space Internet and present a paradigm shift in delivering mobile services to even the most remote regions on Earth. However, the extensive coverage and rapid movement of LEO satellites pose unique challenges for NTN networking, including user equipment (UE) access and inter-satellite delivery, which directly impact the quality of service (QoS) and data transmission continuity. This paper offers an in-depth review of advanced NTN management technologies in the context of 6G evolution, focusing on radio resource management, mobility management, and dynamic network slicing. Building on this foundation and considering the latest trends in NTN development, we then present some innovative perspectives to emerging challenges in satellite beamforming, handover mechanisms, and inter-satellite transmissions. Lastly, we identify open research issues and propose future directions aimed at advancing satellite Internet deployment and enhancing NTN performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00820 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NTN diverse networking scenarios and comparison with TN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structure of GenAI-empowered CSI prediction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Predictive Beamforming Protocol. At, the control phase Bt, and the processing phase Ct. In particular, in the last communication round (t-1), the receiver estimates CSI from the received pilot signal and reports the estimated CSI to the transmitter during the control phase Bt-1. Upon receiving the reported CSI from the last round, the BS predict the CSIT in the next time slot t via the CSI prediction method and gene… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial-temporal signal variation differences between TN and NTN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: UE connectivity and BS signaling in integrated TN-NTN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SD-NTN architecture. suitable next service segment. It is important to note that pre-configuring the NTN serving sequence involves reserving resources in subsequent satellites, a process that incorporates constellation management techniques. This is crucial when managi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Each network slice is customized to meet the specific [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hybrid Beamforming in Non-Terrestrial Networks: Architectures, Design Challenges, and Opportunities

    eess.SP 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes hybrid beamforming research for LEO satellites and UAVs into a common five-category taxonomy and a platform-aware framework.

  2. Industrial Viewpoints on RAN Technologies for 6G

    cs.NI 2025-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    An industry-authored survey predicts 6G radio access will center on mid-band spectrum, evolved massive MIMO, AI/ML integration, OFDM-compatible waveforms, and native satellite support, explicitly labeled as speculation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. Du, T. Lin, C. Jiang, Q. Yang, C. F. Bader, Z. Han. Distributed Foundation Models for Multi-Modal Learning in 6G Wireless Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 2024;31:20–30

    2024

  2. [2]

    Mahboob, L

    S. Mahboob, L. Liu. Revolutionizing Future Connectivity: A Contempo- rary Survey on AI-Empowered Satellite-Based Non-Terrestrial Networks in 6G. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2024;26:1279–321

    2024

  3. [3]

    Geraci, A

    G. Geraci, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, M. M. Azari, A. Lozano, M. Mez- zavilla, S. Chatzinotas, et al. What Will the Future of UA V Cellular Communications Be? A Flight From 5G to 6G. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2022;24:1304–35

    2022

  4. [4]

    Non-Terrestrial Networks in the 6G Era: Challenges and Opportunities

    Giordani M, Zorzi M. Non-Terrestrial Networks in the 6G Era: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Netw 2021;35:244–51

    2021

  5. [5]

    Geraci, D

    G. Geraci, D. L ´opez-P´erez, M. Benzaghta, S. Chatzinotas. Integrating Ter- restrial and Non-Terrestrial Networks: 3D Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 2023;61:42–8

    2023

  6. [6]

    Kodheli, E

    O. Kodheli, E. Lagunas, N. Maturo, S. K. Sharma, B. Shankar, J. F. M. Montoya, et al. Satellite Communications in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2021;23:70–109

    2021

  7. [7]

    F. Wang, D. Jiang, Z. Wang, Z. Lv, S. Mumtaz. Fuzzy-CNN Based Multi- Task Routing for Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2022;71:1913–26

    2022

  8. [8]

    S. Ji, M. Sheng, D. Zhou, W. Bai, Q. Cao, J. Li. Flexible and Distributed Mobility Management for Integrated Terrestrial-Satellite Networks: Chal- lenges, Architectures, and Approaches. IEEE Netw 2021;35:73–81

    2021

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Study on New Radio (NR) to support non-terrestrial networks (Release 15) 2020

    3GPP Technical Report 38.811. Study on New Radio (NR) to support non-terrestrial networks (Release 15) 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Solutions for NR to support nonterres- trial networks (NTN) (Release 16) 2019

    3GPP Technical Report 38.821. Solutions for NR to support nonterres- trial networks (NTN) (Release 16) 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) L-/S band for NR (Release 18) 2023

    3GPP Technical Report 38.741. Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) L-/S band for NR (Release 18) 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Non-terrestrial networks (NTN) related RF and co-existence aspects (Release 18) 2023

    3GPP Technical Report 38.863. Non-terrestrial networks (NTN) related RF and co-existence aspects (Release 18) 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Rate-splitting multiple access- based satellite-vehicular communication system: A noncooperative game theoretical approach

    Zhang S, Zhang S, Yuan W, Quek TQ. Rate-splitting multiple access- based satellite-vehicular communication system: A noncooperative game theoretical approach. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 2023;4:430–41

    2023

  6. [14]

    Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for interference-aware channel allocation in non-terrestrial networks

    Cho Y , Yang W, Oh D, Jo H-S. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for interference-aware channel allocation in non-terrestrial networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2023;27:936–40

    2023

  7. [15]

    Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM

    Elmahallawy M, Luo T, Ramadan K. Communication-efficient federated learning for LEO constellations integrated with HAPs using hybrid NOMA-OFDM. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2024;42:1097–114

    2024

  8. [16]

    Scalable routing in low-earth orbit satellite constel- lations: Architecture and algorithms

    Zhang S, Yeung KL. Scalable routing in low-earth orbit satellite constel- lations: Architecture and algorithms. Comput Commun 2022;188:26–38

    2022

  9. [17]

    Segment routing for traffic engineering and effective recovery in low-earth orbit satellite constellations

    Zhang S, Li X, Yeung KL. Segment routing for traffic engineering and effective recovery in low-earth orbit satellite constellations. Digit Commun Netw 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Joint in-orbit computation and communication for minimizing download time from LEO satellites

    Ouyang Q, Ye N, Gao J, Wang A, Zhao L. Joint in-orbit computation and communication for minimizing download time from LEO satellites. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2023:1–14

    2023

  11. [19]

    A survey on space-air-ground- sea integrated network security in 6G

    Guo H, Li J, Liu J, Tian N, Kato N. A survey on space-air-ground- sea integrated network security in 6G. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2022;24:53–87

    2022

  12. [20]

    A survey on technologies, standards, and open challenges in satellite IoT

    Centenaro M, Costa CE, Granelli F, Sacchi C, Vangelista L. A survey on technologies, standards, and open challenges in satellite IoT. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2021;23:1693–720

    2021

  13. [21]

    Transformer-based channel prediction for rate-splitting multiple access- enabled vehicle-to-everything communication

    Zhang S, Zhang S, Mao Y , Yeung LK, Clerckx B, Quek TQ. Transformer-based channel prediction for rate-splitting multiple access- enabled vehicle-to-everything communication. IEEE Trans Wirel Com- mun 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Channel modeling and estimation for reconfigurable-intelligent-surface-based 6G SAGIN IoT

    Meng X, Zhang N, Jian M, Kadoch M, Yang D. Channel modeling and estimation for reconfigurable-intelligent-surface-based 6G SAGIN IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 2023;10:9273–82

    2023

  15. [23]

    Learning-based predictive beamforming for integrated sensing and communication in vehicular networks

    Liu C, others. Learning-based predictive beamforming for integrated sensing and communication in vehicular networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2022;40:2317–34

    2022

  16. [24]

    Channel estimation based on deep learning in vehicle-to-everything environments

    Pan J, Shan H, Li R, Wu Y , Wu W, Quek TQ. Channel estimation based on deep learning in vehicle-to-everything environments. IEEE Commun Lett 2021;25:1891–5

    2021

  17. [25]

    A novel ISAC trans- mission framework based on spatially-spread orthogonal time frequency space modulation

    Li S, Yuan W, Liu C, Wei Z, Yuan J, Bai B, et al. A novel ISAC trans- mission framework based on spatially-spread orthogonal time frequency space modulation. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2022;40:1854–72

    2022

  18. [26]

    OTFS-SCMA: A downlink NOMA scheme for massive connectivity in high mobility channels

    Wen H, Yuan W, Liu Z, Li S. OTFS-SCMA: A downlink NOMA scheme for massive connectivity in high mobility channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2023;22:5770–84

    2023

  19. [27]

    Neural network-based fading channel prediction: A comprehensive overview

    Jiang W, Schotten HD. Neural network-based fading channel prediction: A comprehensive overview. IEEE Access 2019;7:118112–24

    2019

  20. [28]

    Rate-splitting for multi-antenna non- orthogonal unicast and multicast transmission: Spectral and energy ef- ficiency analysis

    Mao Y , Clerckx B, Li VO. Rate-splitting for multi-antenna non- orthogonal unicast and multicast transmission: Spectral and energy ef- ficiency analysis. IEEE Trans Commun 2019;67:8754–70

    2019

  21. [29]

    Efficient rate-splitting multiple access for the internet of vehicles: Federated edge learning and latency minimization

    Zhang S, Zhang S, Yuan W, Li Y , Hanzo L. Efficient rate-splitting multiple access for the internet of vehicles: Federated edge learning and latency minimization. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2023;41:1468–83

    2023

  22. [30]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for down- link communication systems: Bridging, generalizing, and outperforming SDMA and NOMA

    Mao Y , Clerckx B, Li VO. Rate-splitting multiple access for down- link communication systems: Bridging, generalizing, and outperforming SDMA and NOMA. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2018;2018:1–54. 12

    2018

  23. [31]

    Huang, W

    X. Huang, W. Qi, X. Xia, Y . Sun, Z. Sun, M. Peng. IoT NTN for V oice Services: Architectures, Protocols, and Challenges. IEEE Netw 2024;38:40–7

    2024

  24. [32]

    H. K. Dureppagari, C. Saha, H. S. Dhillon, R. M. Buehrer. NTN-Based 6G Localization: Vision, Role of LEOs, and Open Problems. IEEE Wirel Commun 2023;30:44–51

    2023

  25. [33]

    B. Rong, H. Rutagemwa. Leveraging Large Language Models for Intelligent Control of 6G Integrated TN-NTN With IoT Service. IEEE Netw 2024;38:136–42

    2024

  26. [34]

    Y . Shi, Y . Cao, J. Liu, N. Kato. A Cross-Domain SDN Architecture for Multi-Layered Space-Terrestrial Integrated Networks. IEEE Netw 2019;33:29–35

    2019

  27. [35]

    G. Wang, S. Zhou, S. Zhang, Z. Niu, X. Shen. SFC-Based Service Provisioning for Reconfigurable Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2020;38:1478–89

    2020

  28. [36]

    S. Zhou, G. Wang, S. Zhang, Z. Niu, X. S. Shen. Bidirectional Mission Offloading for Agile Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 2019;26:38–45

    2019

  29. [37]

    Sheng, Y

    M. Sheng, Y . Wang, J. Li, R. Liu, D. Zhou, L. He. Toward a Flexible and Reconfigurable Broadband Satellite Network: Resource Management Architecture and Strategies. IEEE Wirel Commun 2017;24:127–33

    2017

  30. [38]

    H. Yang, W. Liu, J. Li, T. Q. S. Quek. Space Information Network With Joint Virtual Network Function Deployment and Flow Routing Strategy With QoS Constraints. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2023;41:1737–56

    2023

  31. [39]

    Z. Jia, M. Sheng, J. Li, D. Zhou, Z. Han. VNF-Based Service Provision in Software Defined LEO Satellite Networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2021;20:6139–53

    2021

  32. [40]

    B. Han, V . Gopalakrishnan, L. Ji, S. Lee. Network function virtualiza- tion: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Commun Mag 2015;53:90–7

    2015

  33. [41]

    H. Kim, N. Feamster. Improving network management with software defined networking. IEEE Commun Mag 2013;51:114–9

    2013

  34. [42]

    S. Yuan, Y . Sun, M. Peng. Joint Network Function Placement and Routing Optimization in Dynamic Software-Defined Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2024;23:5172–86

    2024

  35. [43]

    Y . Bi, G. Han, S. Xu, X. Wang, C. Lin, Z. Yu, et al. Software Defined Space-Terrestrial Integrated Networks: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Netw 2019;33:22–8

    2019

  36. [44]

    W. Wu, C. Zhou, M. Li, H. Wu, H. Zhou, N. Zhang, et al. AI-Native Network Slicing for 6G Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 2022;29:96–103

    2022

  37. [45]

    L. Lei, Y . Yuan, T. X. Vu, S. Chatzinotas, M. Minardi, J. F. M. Montoya. Dynamic-Adaptive AI Solutions for Network Slicing Management in Satellite-Integrated B5G Systems. IEEE Netw 2021;35:91–7

    2021

  38. [46]

    T. K. Rodrigues, N. Kato. Network Slicing with Centralized and Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Combined Satellite/Ground Net- works in a 6G Environment. IEEE Wirel Commun 2022;29:104–10

    2022

  39. [47]

    D. Bega, M. Gramaglia, A. Garcia-Saavedra, M. Fiore, A. Banchs, X. Costa-Perez. Network Slicing Meets Artificial Intelligence: An AI-Based Framework for Slice Management. IEEE Commun Mag 2020;58:32–8

    2020

  40. [48]

    Z. Shu, T. Taleb. A Novel QoS Framework for Network Slicing in 5G and Beyond Networks Based on SDN and NFV . IEEE Netw 2020;34:256–63

    2020

  41. [49]

    H. Pan, H. Yao, T. Mai, N. Zhang, Y . Liu. Scalable Traffic Control Using Programmable Data Planes in a Space Information Network. IEEE Netw 2021;35:35–41

    2021

  42. [50]

    Zhang, J

    T. Zhang, J. Li, H. Li, S. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Shen. Application of Time-Varying Graph Theory over the Space Information Networks. IEEE Netw 2020;34:179–85

    2020

  43. [51]

    Sheng, D

    M. Sheng, D. Zhou, R. Liu, Y . Wang, J. Li. Resource Mobility in Space Information Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Approaches. IEEE Netw 2019;33:128–35

    2019

  44. [52]

    H. Wu, J. Chen, C. Zhou, W. Shi, N. Cheng, W. Xu, et al. Resource Management in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Vehicular Networks: SDN Control and AI Algorithm Design. IEEE Wirel Commun 2020;27:52–60

    2020

  45. [53]

    Predictive downlink beamforming for wideband CDMA over Rayleigh-fading channels

    Dong L, Xu G, Ling H. Predictive downlink beamforming for wideband CDMA over Rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2005;4:410–21

    2005

  46. [54]

    Autoregressive modeling for fading channel simulation

    Baddour K, Beaulieu N. Autoregressive modeling for fading channel simulation. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2005;4:1650–62

    2005

  47. [55]

    Machine learning based channel modeling for vehicular visible light communication

    Turan B, Coleri S. Machine learning based channel modeling for vehicular visible light communication. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2021;70:9659–72

    2021

  48. [56]

    Machine learning-based channel predic- tion in massive MIMO with channel aging

    Yuan J, Ngo HQ, Matthaiou M. Machine learning-based channel predic- tion in massive MIMO with channel aging. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2020;19:2960–73

    2020

  49. [57]

    Fading channel prediction based on combination of complex-valued neural networks and chirp Z-transform

    Ding T, Hirose A. Fading channel prediction based on combination of complex-valued neural networks and chirp Z-transform. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2014;25:1686–95

    2014

  50. [58]

    LSTM-based channel prediction for secure massive MIMO communications under imperfect CSI

    Peng T, Zhang R, Cheng X, Yang L. LSTM-based channel prediction for secure massive MIMO communications under imperfect CSI. 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. ICC, IEEE; 2020, p. 1–6

    2020

  51. [59]

    Accurate channel prediction based on transformer: Making mobility negligible

    Jiang H, Cui M, Ng DWK, Dai L. Accurate channel prediction based on transformer: Making mobility negligible. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2022;40:2717–32

    2022

  52. [60]

    Rate-splitting unifying SDMA, OMA, NOMA, and multicasting in MISO broadcast channel: A simple two-user rate analysis

    Clerckx B, Mao Y , Schober R, Poor HV . Rate-splitting unifying SDMA, OMA, NOMA, and multicasting in MISO broadcast channel: A simple two-user rate analysis. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 2020;9:349–53

    2020

  53. [61]

    Location-aware predictive beamforming for UA V communications: A deep learning approach

    Liu C, Yuan W, Wei Z, Liu X, Ng DWK. Location-aware predictive beamforming for UA V communications: A deep learning approach. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 2021;10:668–72

    2021

  54. [62]

    Orthogonal time fre- quency space and predictive beamforming-enabled URLLC in vehicular networks

    Yuan W, Zou J, Cui Y , Li X, Mu J, Han K. Orthogonal time fre- quency space and predictive beamforming-enabled URLLC in vehicular networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 2023;30:56–62

    2023

  55. [63]

    Bayesian predictive beamforming for vehicular networks: A low- overhead joint radar-communication approach

    Yuan W, Liu F, Masouros C, Yuan J, Ng DWK, Gonzalez-Prelcic N. Bayesian predictive beamforming for vehicular networks: A low- overhead joint radar-communication approach. IEEE Trans Wirel Com- mun 2021;20:1442–56

    2021

  56. [64]

    Rinaldi, S

    F. Rinaldi, S. Pizzi, A. Molinaro, A. Iera, G. Araniti. Cooperative Resource Allocation in Integrated Terrestrial/Non-Terrestrial 5G and Beyond Networks, 2020, p. 1–6

    2020

  57. [65]

    E. Juan, M. Lauridsen, J. Wigard, P. Mogensen. Handover Solutions for 5G Low-Earth Orbit Satellite Networks. IEEE Access 2022;10:93309–25

    2022

  58. [66]

    5G New Radio Mobility Performance in LEO-based Non-Terrestrial Networks 2020

    Juan E, Lauridsen M, Wigard J, Mogensen PE. 5G New Radio Mobility Performance in LEO-based Non-Terrestrial Networks 2020

    2020

  59. [67]

    F. Wang, D. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Chen, T. Q. S. Quek. Seamless Handover in LEO Based Non-Terrestrial Networks: Service Continuity and Optimization. IEEE Trans Commun 2023;71:1008–23

    2023

  60. [68]

    J. Ye, G. Pan, M. S. Alouini. Earth Rotation-Aware Non-Stationary Satellite Communication Systems: Modeling and Analysis. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2021;20:5942–56

    2021

  61. [69]

    J. Lee, W. Lee, J. -H. Kim. Performance Evaluation of Location-based Conditional Handover Scheme using LEO Satellites. 2023 14th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Converg. ICTC, 2023, p. 1642–4

    2023

  62. [70]

    Stanczak, U

    J. Stanczak, U. Karabulut, A. Awada. Conditional Handover in 5G - Principles, Future Use Cases and FR2 Performance, 2022, p. 660–5

    2022

  63. [71]

    J. Yang, Z. Xiao, H. Cui, J. Zhao, G. Jiang, Z. Han. DQN-ALrM-Based Intelligent Handover Method for Satellite-Ground Integrated Network. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 2023;9:977–90

    2023

  64. [72]

    Y . Kang, Y . Zhu, D. Wang, Z. Han, T. Bas ¸ar. Joint Server Se- lection and Handover Design for Satellite-Based Federated Learning Using Mean-Field Evolutionary Approach. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 2024;11:1655–67

    2024

  65. [73]

    Q. Liu, X. Li, H. Ji, H. Zhang. User Grouping-Based Beam Handover Scheme with Load-Balancing for LEO Satellite Networks, 2023, p. 3965–70

    2023

  66. [74]

    Zhang, A

    S. Zhang, A. Liu, C. Han, X. Ding, X. Liang. A Network-Flows-Based Satellite Handover Strategy for LEO Satellite Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 2021;10:2669–73

    2021

  67. [75]

    Y . Song, Y . Cao, Y . Hou, B. Cai, C. Wu, Z. Sun. A Channel Perceiving- Based Handover Management in Space–Ground Integrated Information Network. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 2024;21:882–96

    2024

  68. [76]

    A Multi-objective Satellite Handover Strategy Based on Entropy in LEO Satellite Communications 2020

    Zhang S, Liu A, Liang X. A Multi-objective Satellite Handover Strategy Based on Entropy in LEO Satellite Communications 2020

    2020

  69. [77]

    Forecast Based Handover in an Extensible Multi- Layer LEO Mobile Satellite System

    Li Y , Zhou W, Zhou S. Forecast Based Handover in an Extensible Multi- Layer LEO Mobile Satellite System. IEEE Access 2020;8:42768–83

    2020

  70. [78]

    Y . Wu, G. Hu, F. Jin, J. Zu. A Satellite Handover Strategy Based on the Potential Game in LEO Satellite Networks. IEEE Access 2019;7:133641–52

    2019

  71. [79]

    Al-Hourani

    A. Al-Hourani. Session Duration Between Handovers in Dense LEO Satellite Networks. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett 2021;10:2810–4

    2021

  72. [80]

    Al-Hourani

    A. Al-Hourani. A Tractable Approach for Predicting Pass Duration in Dense Satellite Networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2021;25:2698–702

    2021

  73. [81]

    Y . Li, S. Wang, W. Zhou. A Novel Dynamic Resource Optimization Method in LEO-MSS Downlink with Multi-service Based on Handover Forecasting, 2019, p. 809–14

    2019

  74. [82]

    Marchese, A

    M. Marchese, A. Moheddine, F. Patrone, T. d. Cola, M. Mongelli. QoS- Aware Handover Strategies for Q/V Feeder Links in VHTS Systems, 2020, p. 1–7

    2020

  75. [83]

    J. Miao, P. Wang, H. Yin, N. Chen, X. Wang. A Multi-attribute Decision Handover Scheme for LEO Mobile Satellite Networks, 2019, p. 938–42

    2019

  76. [84]

    Zhang, N

    C. Zhang, N. Zhang, W. Cao, K. Tian, Z. Yang. An AI-Based Optimiza- tion of Handover Strategy in Non-Terrestrial Networks, 2020, p. 1–6. 13

    2020

  77. [85]

    Machine Learning Based Resource Allocation in Satellite Networks Supporting Internet of Remote Things

    Zhou D, Sheng M, Wang Y , Li J, Han Z. Machine Learning Based Resource Allocation in Satellite Networks Supporting Internet of Remote Things. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2021:1–1

    2021

  78. [86]

    J. Wang, W. Mu, Y . Liu, L. Guo, S. Zhang, G. Gui. Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Satellite Handover Scheme for Satellite Communications, 2021, p. 1–6

    2021

  79. [87]

    Y . Zhao, A. Xiao, S. Wu, H. Jia. Link Quality-Aware Handover Planning for Space-Aerial-Terrestrial Integrated Networks, 2023, p. 6603–8

    2023

  80. [88]

    Y . Zhou, R. Meng, H. Xiong, S. Han, X. Xu. Evolutionary Game-Based Vertical Handover Strategy for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network, 2023, p. 1–6

    2023

  81. [89]

    Zhang, S

    N. Zhang, S. Zhang, P. Yang, O. Alhussein, W. Zhuang, X. S. Shen. Soft- ware Defined Space-Air-Ground Integrated Vehicular Networks: Chal- lenges and Solutions. IEEE Commun Mag 2017;55:101–9

    2017

  82. [90]

    J. Li, K. Xue, J. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Fang. An ICN/SDN-Based Net- work Architecture and Efficient Content Retrieval for Future Satellite- Terrestrial Integrated Networks. IEEE Netw 2020;34:188–95

    2020

  83. [91]

    H. Yang, W. Liu, H. Li, J. Li. Maximum Flow Routing Strategy for Space Information Network With Service Function Constraints. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2022;21:2909–23

    2022

  84. [92]

    H. Yang, W. Liu, X. Wang, J. Li. Group Sparse Space Information Network With Joint Virtual Network Function Deployment and Maximum Flow Routing Strategy. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2023;22:5291–305

    2023

  85. [93]

    X. Gao, R. Liu, A. Kaushik. Virtual Network Function Placement in Satellite Edge Computing With a Potential Game Approach. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 2022;19:1243–59

    2022

  86. [94]

    X. Gao, R. Liu, A. Kaushik. Service Chaining Placement Based on Satellite Mission Planning in Ground Station Networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 2021;18:3049–63

    2021

  87. [95]

    Genera- tive AI-enabled vehicular networks: Fundamentals, framework, and case study

    Zhang R, Xiong K, Du H, Niyato D, Kang J, Shen X, et al. Genera- tive AI-enabled vehicular networks: Fundamentals, framework, and case study. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2024

    2024

  88. [96]

    Alraih, R

    S. Alraih, R. Nordin, A. Abu-Samah, I. Shayea, N. F. Abdullah. A Survey on Handover Optimization in Beyond 5G Mobile Networks: Challenges and Solutions. IEEE Access 2023;11:59317–45

    2023

  89. [97]

    E. Juan, M. Lauridsen, J. Wigard, P. Mogensen. Performance Evaluation of the 5G NR Conditional Handover in LEO-based Non-Terrestrial Networks, 2022, p. 2488–93

    2022

  90. [98]

    J. Li, H. Kang, G. Sun, S. Liang, Y . Liu, Y . Zhang. Physical Layer Secure Communications Based on Collaborative Beamforming for UA V Networks: A Multi-objective Optimization Approach, 2021, p. 1–10

    2021

  91. [99]

    F. Wang, S. Zhang, J. Shi, Z. Li, T. Q. S. Quek. Sustainable UA V Mobility Support in Integrated Terrestrial and Non-terrestrial Networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2024:1–1

    2024

  92. [100]

    L. Yang, X. Yang, Z. Bu. A Conditional Handover Strategy Based on Trajectory Prediction for High-Speed Terminals in LEO Satellite Networks. 2024 IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshop ICC Workshop, 2024, p. 1697–701

    2024

  93. [101]

    R2-2210353: Further view on Idle- and Connect- edmode NTN mobility (Release 18) 2022

    3GPP TSG RAN2. R2-2210353: Further view on Idle- and Connect- edmode NTN mobility (Release 18) 2022

    2022

  94. [102]

    J. Li, M. Wang, K. Xue, R. Li, N. Yu, Q. Sun, et al. Fidelity- Guaranteed Entanglement Routing in Quantum Networks. IEEE Trans Commun 2022;70:6748–63

    2022

  95. [103]

    J. Du, C. Jiang, A. Benslimane, S. Guo, Y . Ren. SDN-Based Re- source Allocation in Edge and Cloud Computing Systems: An Evolu- tionary Stackelberg Differential Game Approach. IEEEACM Trans Netw 2022;30:1613–28

    2022

  96. [104]

    T. Wood, K. K. Ramakrishnan, J. Hwang, G. Liu, W. Zhang. Toward a software-based network: integrating software defined networking and network function virtualization. IEEE Netw 2015;29:36–41

    2015

  97. [105]

    Mijumbi, J

    R. Mijumbi, J. Serrat, J. -L. Gorricho, N. Bouten, F. De Turck, R. Boutaba. Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2016;18:236–62

    2016

  98. [106]

    Bertaux, S

    L. Bertaux, S. Medjiah, P. Berthou, S. Abdellatif, A. Hakiri, P. Gelard, et al. Software defined networking and virtualization for broadband satellite networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2015;53:54–60

    2015

  99. [107]

    Ammar, C

    S. Ammar, C. Pong Lau, B. Shihada. An In-Depth Survey on Virtu- alization Technologies in 6G Integrated Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 2024;5:3690–734

    2024

  100. [108]

    Zhang, Y

    N. Zhang, Y . -F. Liu, H. Farmanbar, T. -H. Chang, M. Hong, Z. - Q. Luo. Network Slicing for Service-Oriented Networks Under Resource Constraints. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2017;35:2512–21

    2017

  101. [109]

    W. -K. Chen, Y . -F. Liu, F. Liu, Y . -H. Dai, Z. -Q. Luo. Towards Efficient Large-Scale Network Slicing: An LP Dynamic Rounding-and- Refinement Approach. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2023;71:615–30

    2023

  102. [110]

    W. Liu, H. Yang, J. Li. Multi-Functional Time Expanded Graph: A Unified Graph Model for Communication, Storage, and Computa- tion for Dynamic Networks Over Time. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2023;41:418–31

    2023

  103. [111]

    Dynamic cooperative spectrum sharing in a multi-beam LEO-GEO co-existing satellite system

    Gu P, Li R, Hua C, Tafazolli R. Dynamic cooperative spectrum sharing in a multi-beam LEO-GEO co-existing satellite system. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2022;21:1170–82

    2022

  104. [112]

    Performance analysis of co- operative non-orthogonal multiple access scheme in two-layer GEO/LEO satellite network

    Ge R, Bian D, An K, Cheng J, Zhu H. Performance analysis of co- operative non-orthogonal multiple access scheme in two-layer GEO/LEO satellite network. IEEE Syst J 2022;16:2300–10

    2022

  105. [113]

    Rate splitting multiple access for next generation cognitive radio enabled LEO satellite networks

    Khan WU, Ali Z, Lagunas E, Mahmood A, Asif M, Ihsan A, et al. Rate splitting multiple access for next generation cognitive radio enabled LEO satellite networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2023;22:8423–35

    2023

  106. [114]

    Study on architectural enhance- ments for 5G multicast-broadcast services; Phase 2 (Release 18) 2022

    3GPP Technical Report 23.700-47. Study on architectural enhance- ments for 5G multicast-broadcast services; Phase 2 (Release 18) 2022

    2022

  107. [115]

    F. Wang, G. Geraci, T. Q. S. Quek. Optimizing Cache Content Place- ment in Integrated Terrestrial and Non-terrestrial Networks. GLOBECOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf., 2023, p. 6609–14

    2023

  108. [116]

    A unified framework for joint sensing and communication in resource-constrained mobile edge networks

    Li X, Feng G, Sun Y , Qin S, Liu Y . A unified framework for joint sensing and communication in resource-constrained mobile edge networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 2023;22:5643–56

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.