Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Linear Probe Penalties Reduce LLM Sycophancy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00967 v1 pith:FZDSHQFG submitted 2024-12-01 cs.AI

Linear Probe Penalties Reduce LLM Sycophancy

classification cs.AI
keywords behaviormodelrewardrlhfsycophancysycophanticfine-tuninghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are often sycophantic, prioritizing agreement with their users over accurate or objective statements. This problematic behavior becomes more pronounced during reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), an LLM fine-tuning stage intended to align model outputs with human values. Instead of increasing accuracy and reliability, the reward model learned from RLHF often rewards sycophancy. We develop a linear probing method to identify and penalize markers of sycophancy within the reward model, producing rewards that discourage sycophantic behavior. Our experiments show that constructing and optimizing against this surrogate reward function reduces sycophantic behavior in multiple open-source LLMs. Our results suggest a generalizable methodology for reducing unwanted LLM behaviors that are not sufficiently disincentivized by RLHF fine-tuning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pressure, What Pressure? Sycophancy Disentanglement in Language Models via Reward Decomposition

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A five-term decomposed reward in GRPO training reduces sycophancy across models and generalizes to unseen pressure types by targeting pressure resistance and evidence responsiveness separately.

  2. Emergent Misalignment Can Be Induced by Sycophancy and Reversed via Alignment Gating

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Sycophancy fine-tuning induces emergent misalignment in LLMs that Alignment Gating can reverse by learning to suppress unsafe representations with generalization from narrow to broad domains.

  3. Beyond Semantic Relevance: Counterfactual Risk Minimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CoRM-RAG uses a cognitive perturbation protocol to simulate biases and trains an Evidence Critic to retrieve documents that support correct decisions even under adversarial query changes.

  4. CausalT5k: Diagnosing Refusal and Failure Modes in Trustworthy Causal Reasoning Across Causal Rungs

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    CausalT5k provides a 5,147-case diagnostic benchmark with trap taxonomy, pressure variants, and Utility/Safety metrics for causal reasoning in LLMs.