Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A Survey on Deep Neural Networks in Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Systems

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new survey argues that deep neural networks, organized into seven architecture families, effectively address the scalability and nonlinearity limitations of traditional collaborative filtering.

desk verdict A useful but sloppy survey: good reading list, but the taxonomy table misclassifies five GNN papers as CNN and the collection method is non-reportable. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01378 v1 pith:FBLODDJQ submitted 2024-12-02 cs.AI cs.LG

Pang Li , Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah , Hafiz Mohd Sarim This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords collaborativefilteringrecommendationsystemsdeepneuralnetworkslearningsurveygraphautoencoders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey that tries to establish that deep neural networks, applied within collaborative filtering, overcome the scalability and flexibility limits of traditional matrix-factorization methods, and that the resulting work can be usefully organized into seven architecture families. It reviews roughly eighty papers from 2020 to 2024 and categorizes them as MLP, CNN, RNN, GNN, autoencoder, GAN, or RBM based, while also compiling the datasets and evaluation metrics these works use. The reason this matters is that prior surveys cover only a single deep-learning family, so practitioners lack a single structured map of the whole DNN-CF landscape; this paper aims to provide that map. If the survey is accurate, it gives researchers a reliable entry point for choosing architectures and for locating open problems such as data sparsity, cold start, and interpretability.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the classification framework itself: a taxonomy of DNN architectures applied to collaborative filtering, with the neural collaborative filtering formulation $\hat{r}_{ui} = \sigma(h^T f(P_u, Q_i))$ as the bridge from dot-product matrix factorization to deep interaction models. This taxonomy organizes the literature into MLP, CNN, RNN, GNN, autoencoder, GAN, and RBM families, and it is what lets the survey make comparative claims across models, datasets, and metrics.

What would settle it

A reader who re-runs the literature search with explicit queries and inclusion criteria and finds that major, frequently cited DNN-CF models are missing from the survey's seven categories would show that the coverage claim does not hold; alternatively, checking whether the cited papers' architectures match their placement in the taxonomy would reveal the accuracy of the categorization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The survey establishes that deep neural networks can be systematically organized into seven architecture families, each of which addresses specific collaborative-filtering challenges such as sparsity, cold start, and implicit feedback. It argues that these models extend classical matrix factorization by learning nonlinear user-item interactions, and it provides a structured map of the field's models, datasets, and evaluation metrics. The paper positions its contribution as bridging the gap between collaborative filtering and deep learning surveys, which previously covered only one architecture family at a time.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's usefulness depends on the assumption that the roughly eighty papers it collected over 2020 to 2024 constitute a representative sample of deep-learning collaborative-filtering research, since no search strings, screening rules, or quality filters are reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can use the seven-family taxonomy to choose an architecture based on their data type: sequential data points to RNNs, graph-structured interactions point to GNNs, and reconstruction-based learning points to autoencoders.
  • The consolidated dataset and metric tables give a standard benchmark set for evaluating new deep-neural collaborative-filtering models.
  • The paper's challenge list, including sparsity, cold start, interpretability, privacy, and adversarial robustness, defines a concrete research agenda for the field.
  • The survey's claim that DNNs capture nonlinear relationships implies that purely linear methods are expected to underperform on complex interaction data, guiding future method comparisons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The taxonomy could be extended to transformer-based and large-language-model recommendation methods, which have emerged since the paper's 2020-2024 corpus window and are not covered in the seven families.
  • The survey's emphasis on architecture families rather than training paradigms suggests an orthogonal classification by learning signal, such as implicit versus explicit feedback or centralized versus federated training, might also be informative.
  • If the collected corpus is representative, the clustering of papers around GNNs and autoencoders indicates where the field's momentum currently lies, a trend the paper only partially makes explicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys the use of deep neural network architectures in collaborative filtering recommender systems. It covers seven architecture families (MLP, CNN, RNN, GNN, autoencoder, GAN, RBM), describes representative methods under each, and provides tables of datasets, evaluation metrics, and a high-level classification of application challenges. The stated contribution is a comprehensive analysis and categorization of DNN applications in CF, filling a perceived gap left by surveys that focus on a single model family.

Significance. If the internal inconsistencies were corrected, the survey could serve as a useful entry point for researchers, particularly because it spans multiple architecture families and compiles dataset statistics and metric usage from a substantial set of recent papers. The paper's strengths include the breadth of covered methods and the explicit tables linking references to architecture and metrics. However, the current version contains several factual and editorial errors that undermine its reliability as a reference, so the significance depends on a revision that resolves these issues.

major comments (6)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1 lists references [79]–[83] in the CNN row, but all five are graph convolutional network papers (linear residual GCN, incremental GCN, LightGCN, simplified graph-based CF, and hyperbolic GCN). Section 3.2.1 discusses only [8]–[16] for CNN, and Section 3.2.3 discusses [27]–[46] for GNN, omitting [79]–[83]. This contradicts the advertised comprehensive categorization: a reader relying on Table 1 would misclassify a major GNN subfamily as CNN, while a reader following the GNN section would miss these methods entirely.
  2. [§2.1 (NCF paragraph)] The text near Equation (2) says 'Figure 2 shows the architecture diagram of NCF,' but Figure 2 was already introduced in Section 1 as the percentage distribution by year. The NCF architecture is not shown in Figure 2; this cross-reference is incorrect and should be fixed or replaced with an actual architecture diagram.
  3. [§3.2.3 (GNN update rule)] The GNN section states 'The rule is: (4)' and then gives a verbal description of node embedding updates, but Equation (4) is not actually displayed. Since the paper aims to introduce GNNs to readers, the missing equation is a substantive technical gap and should be added.
  4. [§3.2.3 (SimRec)] References [37] and [45] are the same work (Xia et al., 2023, 'Graph-less collaborative filtering'), but the text cites them separately for SimRec with different descriptions: [37] 'transferring knowledge from a teacher GNN to a lightweight student network' and [45] 'combines knowledge distillation and contrastive learning.' This duplication and inconsistency should be resolved.
  5. [§3.2.4 (Privacy Protection)] The text attributes the 'N3S' model to Zhang et al. [47], but reference [47] is titled 'HN3S: A Federated AutoEncoder framework for Collaborative Filtering via Hybrid Negative Sampling and Secret Sharing.' The model name in the text does not match the cited source; this is a factual error that should be corrected.
  6. [§1 (Approach to papers collection)] The methodology states that the authors used Google Scholar to collect 'approximately 80 relevant papers' from four publishers, but it reports no search strings, inclusion or exclusion criteria, or screening process. Without this information, the claim that the survey provides a comprehensive and reliable categorization cannot be verified or reproduced; the corpus may be unrepresentative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical error: 'a examination' should be 'an examination.'
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption reads 'Figure 5 shows a sampe of Multilayer Perceptron architecture'; 'sampe' should be 'sample.'
  3. [§4.3 (Data Sparsity bullet)] The bullet 'Data Sparsity: Techniques used in models like FEDNCF [4] and SRSCCNN [13]' appears to cite the wrong reference: FedNCF is reference [1], not [4], and the model name should be SRSCNN as used in §3.2.1, not SRSCCNN.
  4. [Table 3] Table 3 lists references [79], [82], and [83] under metric rows, but these GCN papers are not discussed in the architecture sections and are misclassified in Table 1; the metric table should be cross-checked with the corrected taxonomy.
  5. [§4.3 (Adaptive Propagation bullet)] The bullet 'Adaptive Propagation: Techniques in models like CARA [17]' cites reference [17], which is the CRCF model described in §3.2.2, not a model named CARA; the model name should be verified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey categorizes cited literature and makes no prediction or derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript is a literature survey, not a derivation with fitted parameters or predicted quantities. Its central claim is a 'comprehensive analysis and categorization' of DNN-based collaborative filtering papers, supported by a corpus-collection description and per-architecture summaries drawn from the cited literature. There is no step in which an output equals an input by construction: the equations reproduced (cosine similarity, NCF scoring, RNN hidden-state update, GNN embedding update) are standard definitions or cited formulations, and none is used as evidence for the survey's taxonomy. The taxonomy in Table 1 is a reporting device over the collected papers; even if it is internally inconsistent (e.g., refs. [79]-[83], which are graph-based methods, are listed under CNN rather than GNN), that is a correctness or consistency defect, not circularity. Similarly, the duplicated [37]/[45] entry and the N3S/HN3S name mismatch are bibliographic quality issues, not self-referential reductions. No load-bearing self-citation exists: the prior surveys named by the authors ([85]-[88]) are by other researchers and are used only to position the present survey, not to justify a conclusion that presupposes it. Thus, the survey's claims are not equivalent to their inputs by construction, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no fitted parameters or new entities. Its only load-bearing inputs are the reliability and representativeness of the cited literature and the accuracy of the survey's summaries; both are assumed rather than demonstrated.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The 80-paper corpus collected from Google Scholar is representative of the DNN-CF literature.
    The Introduction's 'Approach to papers collection' describes only the search engine, time window (2020-2024), and publisher names, with no inclusion/exclusion criteria or search queries. The survey's comprehensiveness claim depends on this.
  • domain assumption The summaries and attributions of each cited paper are faithful to the original papers.
    Each section maps a cited model to a named contribution (e.g., 'Chen et al. [73] proposed the CRBM-IR model'). The survey would mislead if these attributions are wrong; internal mismatches (e.g., [47] named N3S in text vs HN3S in references) show this premise is not guaranteed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Deep Neural Networks in Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBLODDJQ

@misc{pith2026241201378,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Deep Neural Networks in Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBLODDJQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01378}
}
read the original abstract

This survey provides an examination of the use of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) in Collaborative Filtering (CF) recommendation systems. As the digital world increasingly relies on data-driven approaches, traditional CF techniques face limitations in scalability and flexibility. DNNs can address these challenges by effectively modeling complex, non-linear relationships within the data. We begin by exploring the fundamental principles of both collaborative filtering and deep neural networks, laying the groundwork for understanding their integration. Subsequently, we review key advancements in the field, categorizing various deep learning models that enhance CF systems, including Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Graph Neural Networks (GNN), autoencoders, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), and Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM). The paper also discusses evaluation protocols, various publicly available auxiliary information, and data features. Furthermore, the survey concludes with a discussion of the challenges and future research opportunities in enhancing collaborative filtering systems with deep learning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01378 by the authors.

Figure 12
Figure 12. Classifications of Deep Learning Applications in Collaborative Filtering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey on Large Language Models in Multimodal Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature survey that categorizes LLM-based multimodal recommendation methods into prompting, training, and data-adaptation families and compiles datasets and metrics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [79]

    (2020, April)

    Chen, L., Wu, L., Hong, R., Zhang, K., & Wang, M. (2020, April). Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: A linear residual graph convolutional network approach. In Proceedings of the AAAIconferenceonartificialintelligence(Vol.34,No.01,pp.27-34)

    work page 2020

  2. [83]

    (2021, April)

    Sun, J., Cheng, Z., Zuberi, S., Pérez, F., & Volkovs, M. (2021, April). Hgcf: Hyperbolic graph convolution networks for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (pp. 593- 601)

    work page 2021

  3. [37]

    (2023, April)

    Xia, L., Huang, C., Shi, J., & Xu, Y. (2023, April). Graph-less collaborative filtering. In ProceedingsoftheACMWebConference2023(pp.17-27)

    work page 2023

  4. [45]

    (2023, April)

    Xia, L., Huang, C., Shi, J., & Xu, Y. (2023, April). Graph-less collaborative filtering. InProceedingsoftheACMWebConference2023(pp.17-27)

    work page 2023

  5. [8]

    Chen,M.,Ma,T.,&Zhou,X.(2022).CoCNN:Co-occurrenceCNNforrecommendation.Expert SystemswithApplications,195,116595

    2022

  6. [16]

    Li, N., & Xia, Y. (2024). Movie recommendation based on ALS collaborative filtering recommendationalgorithmwithdeeplearningmodel.EntertainmentComputing,100715

    work page 2024

  7. [27]

    Lin, Z., Tian, C., Hou, Y., & Zhao, W. X. (2022, April). Improving graph collaborative filtering with neighborhood-enriched contrastive learning.InProceedingsoftheACMwebconference2022 (pp. 2320-2329)

    work page 2022

  8. [46]

    Wang, X., Jin, H., Zhang, A., He, X., Xu, T., & Chua, T. S. (2020, July). Disentangled graph collaborative filtering.InProceedingsofthe43rdinternationalACMSIGIRconferenceonresearchand developmentininformationretrieval(pp.1001-1010)

    work page 2020

  9. [47]

    Zhang, L., Li, G., Yuan, L., Ding, X., & Rong, Q. (2024). HN3S: A Federated AutoEncoder framework for Collaborative Filtering via Hybrid Negative Sampling and Secret Sharing. Information Processing&Management,61(2),103580

    work page 2024

Show all 94 references
  1. [1]

    Perifanis, V., & Efraimidis, P. S. (2022). Federated neural collaborative filtering. Knowledge- BasedSystems,242,108441

    2022

  2. [2]

    A., & Kao, H

    Pugoy, R. A., & Kao, H. Y. (2021, August). Unsupervised extractive summarization-based representations for accurate and explainable collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJIM Revised2018 MeetingoftheAssociation for...

    2021

  3. [3]

    Lin, W., Zhu, M., Zhou, X., Zhang, R., Zhao, X., Shen, S., & Sun, L. (2023). A deep neural collaborativefilteringbasedservicerecommendationmethodwithmulti-sourcedataforsmartcloud-edge collaborationapplications.Tsinghua ScienceandTechnology,29(3),897-910

    2023

  4. [4]

    Y., & Lim, C

    Kim, J. Y., & Lim, C. K. (2023). Feature Extracted Deep Neural Collaborative Filtering for E- BookServiceRecommendations.AppliedSciences,13(11),6833

    2023

  5. [5]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,34(10),4650-4662

    Yu,R.,Ye,D.,Wang,Z.,Zhang,B.,Oguti,A.M.,Li,J.,...&Kurdahi,F.(2021).CFFNN:Cross feature fusion neural network for collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,34(10),4650-4662

    2021

  6. [6]

    D., Chen, Y

    Wang, C. D., Chen, Y. H., Xi, W. D., Huang, L., & Xie, G. (2021). Cross-domain explicit– implicit-mixed collaborative filtering neural network. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems,52(11),6983-6997

    2021

  7. [7]

    IEEE access, 8, 110915-110928

    Ullah,F.,Zhang,B.,Khan,R.U.,Chung,T.S.,Attique,M.,Khan,K.,...&Jan,S.(2020).Deep edu: a deep neural collaborative filtering for educational services recommendation. IEEE access, 8, 110915-110928

    2020

  8. [9]

    K., & Xu, C

    Lin, Z., Feng, L., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Yin, R., Kwoh, C. K., & Xu, C. (2023). Comet: Convolutional dimension interactionfor collaborative filtering. ACMTransactions on Intelligent Systems andTechnology,14(4),1-18

    2023

  9. [10]

    Gao,Y.,Chen,J.,Xiao,L.,Wang,H.,Pan,L.,Wen, X.,...&Wu,X.(2023).AdversarialNeural CollaborativeFilteringwithEmbeddingDimensionCorrelations.Data Intelligence,5(3),786-806

    2023

  10. [11]

    N., & Robinson, Y

    Bhuvaneshwari, P., Rao, A. N., & Robinson, Y. H. (2023). Top-n recommendation system using explicit feedbackand outerproduct based residualcnn.Wireless Personal Communications,128(2), 967- 983

    2023

  11. [12]

    Dezfouli, P. A. B., Momtazi, S., & Dehghan, M. (2021). Deep neural review text interaction for recommendationsystems.AppliedSoftComputing,100,106985

    2021

  12. [13]

    Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT),26(1),1-20

    Alrashidi,M.,Selamat,A.,Ibrahim,R., &Fujita, H.(2024).SocialRecommenderSystemBased on CNN Incorporating Tagging and Contextual Features. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT),26(1),1-20

    2024

  13. [14]

    Drammeh, B., & Li, H. (2023). Enhancing neural collaborative filtering using hybrid feature selectionforrecommendation.PeerJ Computer Science,9,e1456

    2023

  14. [15]

    K., Shaikh, A

    Gurav, Y., Prashanth, S. K., Shaikh, A. A., Ravichand, M., Samarthrao, K. V., & Biradar, V. (2023). Experimental Hybrid Technique for Enhancing the Quality of Personalized Product FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJIM Revised2018 Recommendation System using Deep Learn...

    2023

  15. [17]

    Manotumruksa, J., Macdonald, C., & Ounis, I. (2020). A contextual recurrent collaborative filtering framework for modelling sequences of venue checkins. Information Processing & Management,57(6),102092

    2020

  16. [18]

    Do, P. M. T., & Nguyen, T. T. S. (2022). Semantic-enhanced neural collaborative filtering modelsinrecommendersystems.Knowledge-BasedSystems,257,109934

    2022

  17. [19]

    M., & Wu, C

    Huang, C. M., & Wu, C. Y. (2021). The point of interest (POI) recommendation for mobile digital culture heritage (M-DCH) based on the behavior analysis using the recurrent neural networks (RNN)anduser-collaborativefiltering.JournalofInternetTechnology,22(4),821-833

    2021

  18. [20]

    S., Sarwar, N., Hajjej, F., & Sakr, H

    Ibrahim, M., Bajwa, I. S., Sarwar, N., Hajjej, F., & Sakr, H. A. (2023). An intelligent hybrid neuralcollaborativefilteringapproachfortruerecommendations.IEEEAccess

    2023

  19. [21]

    J., & Liu, Y

    Xia, H., Li, J. J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on attentionGRUandadversariallearning.IEEEAccess,8,208149-208157

    2020

  20. [22]

    (2020, December)

    Ebrahimian, M., & Kashef, R. (2020, December). Efficient Detection of Shilling’s Attacks in Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Systems Using Deep Learning Models. In 2020 IEEE InternationalConferenceonIndustrialEngineeringandEngineeringManagement(IEEM)(pp.460-464). IEEE

    2020

  21. [23]

    Li, Z., Hu, H., Xia, Z., Zhang, J., Li, X., Shi, J., ... & Li, X. (2021, July). Exercise recommendation algorithm based on improved collaborative filtering. In2021 International Conference onAdvancedLearningTechnologies(ICALT)(pp.47-49).IEEE

    2021

  22. [24]

    Liang, T., Chen, M., Yin, Y., Zhou, L., & Ying, H. (2021). Recurrent neural network based collaborative filtering for QoS prediction in IoV. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,23(3),2400-2410

    2021

  23. [25]

    Chen, F., Lu, C., Cui, Y., & Gao, Y. (2022). Learning outcome modeling in computer-based assessments for learning: A sequential deep collaborative filtering approach. IEEE Transactions on LearningTechnologies,16(2),243-255

    2022

  24. [26]

    Karabila, I., Darraz, N., El-Ansari, A., Alami, N., & El Mallahi, M. (2023). Enhancing collaborativefiltering-basedrecommendersystemusingsentimentanalysis.FutureInternet,15(7),235

    2023

  25. [28]

    Tang, H., Zhao, G., Bu, X., & Qian, X. (2021). Dynamic evolution of multi-graph based collaborativefilteringforrecommendationsystems.Knowledge-BasedSystems,228,107251

    2021

  26. [29]

    Li, X., Tian, Y., Dong, B., & Ji, S. (2024). MD-GCCF: Multi-view deep graph contrastive learningforcollaborativefiltering.Neurocomputing,590,127756. FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJIM Revised2018

    2024

  27. [30]

    (2022, July)

    Xia, L., Huang, C., Xu, Y., Zhao, J., Yin, D., & Huang, J. (2022, July). Hypergraph contrastive collaborative filtering.InProceedingsofthe45thInternationalACMSIGIRconferenceonresearchand developmentininformationretrieval(pp.70-79)

    2022

  28. [31]

    (2022, July)

    Fan, W., Liu, X., Jin, W., Zhao, X., Tang, J., & Li, Q. (2022, July). Graph trend filtering networks for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conference on researchanddevelopmentininformationretrieval(pp.112-121)

    2022

  29. [32]

    Li, X., Zhang,M., Wu, S., Liu, Z., Wang, L., & Philip, S. Y. (2020, November). Dynamic graph collaborative filtering. In 2020 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM)(pp. 322-331). IEEE

    2020

  30. [33]

    Peng, J., Gong, J., Zhou, C., Zang, Q., Fang, X., Yang, K., & Yu, J. (2024). KGCFRec: ImprovingCollaborativeFilteringRecommendationwithKnowledgeGraph.Electronics,13(10),1927

    2024

  31. [34]

    S., Thejesvika, S

    Sangeetha, M., Manjuladevi, R., Sagana, C., Suruthi, B. S., Thejesvika, S. S., & Vaibhav, R. (2022, March). Predicting personalized recommendations using GNN. In 2022 6th International ConferenceonComputingMethodologiesandCommunication(ICCMC)(pp.228-234).IEEE

    2022

  32. [35]

    & Tang, J

    Wang, Y., Li, C., Li, M., Jin, W., Liu, Y., Sun, H., ... & Tang, J. (2022). Localized graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2022 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM)(pp.540-548).SocietyforIndustrialandAppliedMathematics

    2022

  33. [36]

    Li, C., Hu, L., Shi, C., Song, G., & Lu, Y. (2021). Sequence-aware heterogeneous graph neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2021 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM)(pp.64-72).SocietyforIndustrialandAppliedMathematics

    2021

  34. [38]

    Erfani, S., & Gan, J

    Su, Y., Zhang, R., M. Erfani, S., & Gan, J. (2021, July). Neural graph matching based collaborative filtering.InProceedingsofthe44thinternationalACMSIGIRconferenceonresearchand developmentininformationretrieval(pp.849-858)

    2021

  35. [39]

    Wang,Y.,Li,C., Liu,Z.,Li,M.,Tang,J.,Xie,X.,...&Yu,P.S.(2022).Anadaptivegraphpre- trainingframeworkforlocalizedcollaborativefiltering.ACMTransactionsonInformationSystems,41(2), 1-27

    2022

  36. [40]

    (2023, July)

    Ren, X., Xia, L., Zhao, J., Yin, D., & Huang, C. (2023, July). Disentangled contrastive collaborativefiltering.InProceedingsofthe46thInternationalACMSIGIRConferenceonResearchand DevelopmentinInformationRetrieval(pp.1137-1146)

    2023

  37. [41]

    (2023, June)

    Wang, Y., Liu, Y., & Shen, Z. (2023, June). Revisiting item promotion in GNN-based collaborative filtering: a masked targeted topological attack perspective. In Proceedings of the AAAI ConferenceonArtificialIntelligence(Vol.37,No.12,pp.15206-15214)

    2023

  38. [42]

    Tian, C., Xie, Y., Li, Y., Yang, N., & Zhao, W. X. (2022, July). Learning to denoise unreliable interactions for graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conferenceonresearchanddevelopmentininformationretrieval(pp.122-132)

    2022

  39. [43]

    Chen, J., Xin, X., Liang, X., He, X., & Liu, J. (2022). GDSRec: Graph-based decentralized collaborative filtering for social recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,35(5),4813-4824. FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJIM Revised2018

    2022

  40. [44]

    Hu,J.,Hooi,B.,Qian,S.,Fang,Q.,&Xu,C.(2024).Mgdcf:Distancelearningviamarkovgraph diffusionforneuralcollaborativefiltering.IEEETransactionsonKnowledgeandDataEngineering

    2024

  41. [48]

    Nguyen, M., Yu, J., Nguyen, T., & Yongchareon, S. (2022). High-order autoencoder with data augmentationforcollaborativefiltering.Knowledge-BasedSystems,240,107773

    2022

  42. [49]

    A., & Aljohani, A

    Alharbe, N., Rakrouki, M. A., & Aljohani, A. (2023). A collaborative filtering recommendation algorithmbasedonembeddingrepresentation.ExpertSystemswithApplications,215,119380

    2023

  43. [50]

    Noshad, Z., Bouyer, A., & Noshad, M. (2021). Mutual information-based recommender system usingautoencoder.AppliedSoftComputing,109,107547

    2021

  44. [51]

    In Proceedings ofthe 13thinternationalconferenceonwebsearchanddata mining(pp.528-536)

    Shenbin,I.,Alekseev,A.,Tutubalina,E.,Malykh,V.,&Nikolenko,S.I.(2020,January).Recvae: A new variational autoencoder for top-n recommendations with implicit feedback. In Proceedings ofthe 13thinternationalconferenceonwebsearchanddata mining(pp.528-536)

    2020

  45. [52]

    (2022, April)

    Chen, J., Lian, D., Jin, B., Huang, X., Zheng, K., & Chen, E. (2022, April). Fast variational autoencoder with inverted multi-index for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference2022(pp.1944-1954)

    2022

  46. [53]

    Xia, L., Huang, C., Xu, Y., Xu, H., Li, X., & Zhang, W. (2021). Collaborative reflection- augmented autoencoder network for recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS),40(1),1-22

    2021

  47. [54]

    (2023, October)

    Liu, S., Liu, J., Gu, H., Li, D., Lu, T., Zhang, P., & Gu, N. (2023, October). Autoseqrec: Autoencoder for efficient sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International ConferenceonInformationandKnowledgeManagement(pp.1493-1502)

    2023

  48. [55]

    (2022, September)

    Vančura, V., Alves, R., Kasalický, P., & Kordík, P. (2022, September). Scalable linear shallow autoencoder for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems(pp.604-609)

    2022

  49. [56]

    (2023, June)

    Vančura, V. (2023, June). Scalable and Explainable Linear Shallow Autoencoders for Collaborative Filtering from Industrial Perspective. In Proceedings ofthe 31st ACMConference on User Modeling,AdaptationandPersonalization(pp.290-295)

    2023

  50. [57]

    (2023, September)

    Spišák, M., Bartyzal, R., Hoskovec, A., Peska, L., & Tůma, M. (2023, September). Scalable approximate nonsymmetric autoencoder for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM ConferenceonRecommender Systems(pp.763-770). FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJI...

    2023

  51. [58]

    (2022, July)

    Liu, X., & Wang, Z. (2022, July). CFDA: collaborative filtering with dual autoencoder for recommender system. In 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)(pp. 1-7). IEEE

    2022

  52. [59]

    Tahmasebi,H.,Ravanmehr,R.,&Mohamadrezaei,R.(2021).Socialmovierecommendersystem basedondeepautoencodernetworkusingTwitterdata.NeuralComputingandApplications,33(5),1607- 1623

    2021

  53. [60]

    Pan, Y., He, F., & Yu, H. (2020). Learning social representations with deep autoencoder for recommendersystem.WorldWideWeb,23(4),2259-2279

    2020

  54. [61]

    Zeng, W., Qin, J., & Wei, C. (2021). Neural collaborative autoencoder for recommendation with co-occurrenceembedding.IEEEAccess,9,163316-163324

    2021

  55. [62]

    Zhang, X., Zhong, J., & Liu, K. (2021). Wasserstein autoencoders for collaborative filtering.NeuralComputingandApplications,33(7),2793-2802

    2021

  56. [63]

    T., Salah, A., & Lauw, H

    Truong, Q. T., Salah, A., & Lauw, H. W. (2021, March). Bilateral variational autoencoder for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining(pp.292-300)

    2021

  57. [64]

    In 2021 7th Annual International Conference on Network and InformationSystemsfor Computers(ICNISC)(pp.1-6).IEEE

    Zheng,H.,Xing,X.,Han,Q.,Xin, M.,&Niu,Y.(2021,July).UIAE:Collaborative Filteringfor User and Item based on Auto-Encoder. In 2021 7th Annual International Conference on Network and InformationSystemsfor Computers(ICNISC)(pp.1-6).IEEE

    2021

  58. [65]

    Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F., Gutiérrez, A., & González-Prieto, Á. (2023). Deep variational models for collaborative filtering-based recommender systems. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(10), 7817-7831

    2023

  59. [66]

    (2021, July)

    Polato, M. (2021, July). Federated variational autoencoder for collaborative filtering. In 2021 InternationalJointConferenceonNeuralNetworks(IJCNN)(pp.1-8).IEEE

    2021

  60. [67]

    Zhong, T., Wang, G., Walker, J., Zhang, K., & Zhou, F. (2021). Variational Autoencoder with Copula for Collaborative Filtering. In Workshop on Deep Learning Practice for High-Dimensional SparseData withKDD

    2021

  61. [68]

    (2020, July)

    Carraro, T., Polato, M., & Aiolli, F. (2020, July). A look inside the black-box: Towards the interpretabilityofconditionedvariationalautoencoderforcollaborativefiltering.InAdjunctpublicationof the28thACMconferenceonuser modeling,adaptationandpersonalization(pp.233-236)

    2020

  62. [69]

    Liu, J., Pan, W., & Ming, Z. (2020). CoFiGAN: Collaborative filtering by generative and discriminativetrainingforone-classrecommendation.Knowledge-BasedSystems,191,105255

    2020

  63. [70]

    Bobadilla, J., Gutiérrez, A., Yera, R., & Martínez, L. (2023). Creating synthetic datasets for collaborative filtering recommender systems using generative adversarial networks. Knowledge-Based Systems,280,111016

    2023

  64. [71]

    (2022, April)

    Dervishaj, E., & Cremonesi, P. (2022, April). GAN-based matrix factorization for recommender systems.InProceedingsofthe37thACM/SIGAPPSymposiumonAppliedComputing(pp.1373-1381). FacultyofInformationScienceandTechnology HEJIM Revised2018

    2022

  65. [72]

    Ding, R., Guo, G., Yan, X., Chen, B., Liu, Z., & He, X. (2020). BiGAN: collaborative filtering with bidirectional generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM international conferenceondatamining(pp.82-90).SocietyforIndustrialandAppliedMathematics

    2020

  66. [73]

    Chen, Z., Ma, W., Dai, W., Pan, W., & Ming, Z. (2020). Conditional restricted Boltzmann machineforitemrecommendation.Neurocomputing,385,269-277

    2020

  67. [74]

    M., Gourisaria, M

    Harshvardhan, G. M., Gourisaria, M. K., Rautaray, S. S., & Pandey, M. (2022). UBMTR: Unsupervised Boltzmann machine-based time-aware recommendation system. Journal of King Saud University-ComputerandInformationSciences,34(8),6400-6413

    2022

  68. [75]

    Yang,P.,Varadharajan,S.,Wilson,L.A.,Smith,D.D.,LockmanIII,J.A.,Gundecha,V.,&Ta, Q. (2020). Parallelized training of restricted boltzmann machines using markov-chain monte carlo methods.SNComputerScience,1(3),165

    2020

  69. [76]

    J., & Chen, J

    Kuo, R. J., & Chen, J. T. (2020). An application of differential evolution algorithm-based restricted Boltzmann machine to recommendation systems. Journal of Internet Technology, 21(3), 701- 712

    2020

  70. [77]

    (2018,July).Learning fromhistoryand present: Next-item recommendationvia discriminatively exploiting user behaviors

    Li,Z.,Zhao,H.,Liu,Q.,Huang,Z., Mei,T.,&Chen,E. (2018,July).Learning fromhistoryand present: Next-item recommendationvia discriminatively exploiting user behaviors. InProceedingsofthe 24thACMSIGKDDinternationalconferenceonknowledgediscovery&datamining(pp.1734-1743)

    2018

  71. [78]

    Thorat,P.B.,Goudar,R.M.,&Barve,S.(2015).Surveyoncollaborativefiltering,content-based filteringandhybridrecommendationsystem.InternationalJournalofComputerApplications,110(4),31- 36

    2015

  72. [80]

    (2021, October)

    Xia, J., Li, D., Gu, H., Lu, T., Zhang, P., & Gu, N. (2021, October). Incremental graph convolutional network for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International ConferenceonInformation&KnowledgeManagement(pp.2170-2179)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Mei,D.,Huang,N.,&Li,X.(2021).Lightgraphconvolutionalcollaborativefilteringwithmulti- aspectinformation.IEEEAccess,9,34433-34441

    2021

  74. [82]

    (2023, February)

    He, L., Wang, X., Wang, D., Zou, H., Yin, H., & Xu, G. (2023, February). Simplifying graph- based collaborative filtering for recommendation. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International ConferenceonWebSearchandDataMining(pp.60-68)

    2023

  75. [84]

    Y., & Chua, T

    Lei, W., He, X., Miao, Y., Wu, Q., Hong, R., Kan, M. Y., & Chua, T. S. (2020, January). Estimation-action-reflection:Towardsdeepinteractionbetweenconversationalandrecommendersystems. InProceedingsofthe13thInternationalConferenceonWebSearchandDataMining(pp.304-312). FacultyofIn...

    2020

  76. [85]

    Zhou,H.,Xiong,F.,&Chen,H.(2023).Acomprehensivesurveyofrecommendersystemsbased ondeeplearning.AppliedSciences,13(20),11378

    2023

  77. [86]

    & Li, Y.(2023).Asurvey of graph neural networks for recommender systems: Challenges, methods, and directions

    Gao, C., Zheng,Y.,Li, N.,Li, Y.,Qin,Y., Piao, J.,... & Li, Y.(2023).Asurvey of graph neural networks for recommender systems: Challenges, methods, and directions. ACM Transactions on RecommenderSystems,1(1),1-51

    2023

  78. [87]

    Wu, S., Sun, F., Zhang, W., Xie, X., & Cui, B. (2022). Graph neural networks in recommender systems:asurvey.ACMComputingSurveys,55(5),1-37

    2022

  79. [88]

    Patel, R., Thakkar, P., & Ukani, V. (2024). CNNRec: Convolutional Neural Network based recommendersystems-Asurvey.EngineeringApplicationsofArtificialIntelligence,133,108062

    2024

  80. [89]

    (2020, September)

    Rendle, S., Krichene, W., Zhang, L., & Anderson, J. (2020, September). Neural collaborative filtering vs. matrix factorization revisited.InProceedingsofthe14thACMConferenceonRecommender Systems(pp.240-248)

    2020

  81. [90]

    He, X., Liao, L., Zhang, H., Nie, L., Hu, X., & Chua, T. S. (2017, April). Neural collaborative filtering.InProceedingsofthe26thinternationalconferenceonworldwideweb(pp.173-182)

    2017

  82. [91]

    (2019, October)

    Wen, H., Liu, X., Yan, C., Jiang, L., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Yin, H. (2019, October). Leveraging multiple implicit feedback for personalized recommendation with neural network.InProceedingsofthe 2019InternationalConferenceonArtificialIntelligenceandAdvancedManufacturing(pp.1-6)

    2019

  83. [92]

    G., & Yu, W

    Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018). A survey of deep learning: Platforms, applications and emergingresearchtrends.IEEEaccess,6,24411-24432

    2018

  84. [93]

    D., Zhao, T., Wang, H., Xiong, C., & Socher, R

    Chen, M., Bai, Y., Lee, J. D., Zhao, T., Wang, H., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2020). Towards understanding hierarchical learning: Benefits of neural representations. Advances in Neural Information ProcessingSystems,33,22134-22145

    2020

  85. [94]

    347-384)

    Möller,D.P.(2023).MachineLearningandDeepLearning.InGuidetoCybersecurityinDigital Transformation:Trends, Methods, Technologies, Applicationsand Best Practices (pp. 347-384). Cham: SpringerNatureSwitzerland

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.