Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Real-time tracking the energy flow in cluster formation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Femtosecond pump–probe spectroscopy on magnesium aggregates in helium nanodroplets reveals a delayed photoelectron band peaking at 1.2 ps that the authors attribute to the collapse of a metastable, foam-like Mg_n configuration into a…

desk verdict Solid, carefully analyzed femtosecond data that reports a real delayed band in Mg_n/He_N, but its star claim—that the delay is the collapse of the disputed foam—rests on a premise the paper itself cannot defend. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01458 v1 pith:6GPIOOQ7 submitted 2024-12-02 physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clus

Michael Stadlhofer , Bernhard Thaler , Pascal Heim , Josef Tiggesbäumker , Markus Koch This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.atm-clus
keywords heliumnanodropletsfemtosecondtime-resolvedphotoelectronspectroscopymagnesiumclustersclusterformationdynamicsenergypoolingmetastableconfigurationsglobalfittinganalysisphotoion–photoelectroncovariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a real-time observation of multi-atom cluster formation, a process that has been largely inaccessible to time-domain experiments. By loading superfluid helium nanodroplets with about ten magnesium atoms and exciting them with a femtosecond pump pulse, the authors identify a photoelectron band that rises with a time constant of (450±180) fs and peaks at 1.2 ps. They interpret this delayed band as the signature of nuclear dynamics: the collapse of a metastable, foam-like arrangement of Mg atoms, with a predicted interatomic spacing of 9.5 Å, into a compact van der Waals cluster. The same transient shows that the collapse populates highly excited magnesium states, up to 3 eV above the initial excitation, which the authors attribute to an energy pooling reaction between excited atoms. If correct, this establishes helium nanodroplets as a platform for watching bond formation in larger aggregates and for studying photon energy upconversion on a femtosecond timescale.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the combination of femtosecond pump–probe photoelectron spectroscopy with a global fitting analysis that decomposes the time-resolved spectrum into decay-associated spectra, each with its own transient population function. The delayed band is modeled by a sequential population transfer, $N_i(t) \propto [N_A(t, \tau_A) - N_B(t, \tau_B)] \tau_A/[2(\tau_A-\tau_B)]$, in which an initially excited state (the $3\,^1P_1$ Mg state, which is not directly detected in the one-photon probe window) feeds the observed state with rise time $\tau_A$ and the observed state decays with $\tau_B$. Photoion–photoelectron covariance detection provides the link between the delayed photoelectron band and the nuclear products: only the forming-cluster pathway yields Mg$_n^+$ ions ejected from the droplet. The proposed energy pooling reaction, $\mathrm{Mg}(3\,^1P_1) + \mathrm{Mg}(3\,^1S_0) + \mathrm{He} \to \mathrm{Mg}_2^*(^1\Sigma_u^+, ^1\Pi_g) + \mathrm{He}$ followed by $\mathrm{Mg}_2^* + \mathrm{Mg}(3\,^1P_1) \to \mathrm{Mg}(4\,^3S, 4\,^1S, 3\,^1D, ...) + 2\,\mathrm{Mg}(3\,^1S_0)$, is the mechanism by which the collapse populates states above the excitation energy.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to measure the delayed photoelectron band under conditions where the foam is known to be absent—for example, at high Mg doping where the aggregate has already collapsed, or with droplets of different sizes—and to show that it vanishes; alternatively, a direct structural measurement (femtosecond electron diffraction or a second pump–probe scheme with a longer delay) that resolves the Mg–Mg distance during the first picosecond and finds no contraction from ~9.5 Å to a bond length would falsify the nuclear-motion assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that femtosecond time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of Mg_n aggregates inside helium nanodroplets reveals a delayed photoelectron band peaking at 1.2 ps whose rise time, $ au_{\text{rise}} = (450 \pm 180)$ fs, is the time scale on which a metastable 'foam-like' Mg_n configuration converts into a compact cluster. This assignment separates the response into two species: a prompt band ($\tau = 380 \pm 70$ fs) from pre-formed compact clusters, and a delayed band (rise $450 \pm 180$ fs, decay $4.0 \pm 0.9$ ps) from the forming clusters. The delayed band is correlated with ejection of Mg_n^+ ions from the droplet, linking the electronic signal to nuclear fragmentation. The paper further claims that the collapse populates Mg states with binding energies below the 3.07 eV probe window, including states up to about 3 eV above the initially excited $3\,^1P_1$ state, and proposes an energy pooling mechanism: association of an excited and a ground-state Mg atom into Mg$_2^*$, followed by collision with a second excited Mg atom to yield Mg($4\,^3S$, $4\,^1S$, $3\,^1D$, ...).

Load-bearing premise

The entire interpretation of the delayed band as cluster formation rests on the premise that Mg atoms inside helium nanodroplets can indeed be prepared in a metastable, foam-like configuration with an interatomic spacing of about 9.5 Å, a prediction that the paper itself notes is disputed by simulations finding no such metastable state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the assignment holds, cluster formation in helium nanodroplets can be clocked directly, giving a contraction time of $(450 \pm 180)$ fs for Mg_n aggregates starting from a dilute metastable configuration.
  • The energy pooling pathway implies that a fraction of the absorbed photon energy is re-emitted as electronic excitation of individual atoms up to 3 eV above the pump photon energy, a form of photon upconversion that occurs within the first picosecond of cluster collapse.
  • The covariance between the delayed photoelectron band and ion ejection establishes that electronic relaxation to kinetic energy, not simply ionization, is what liberates ionic fragments from the helium droplet.
  • The distinction between a prompt band (compact clusters) and a delayed band (forming clusters) provides a time-domain fingerprint that frequency-domain spectroscopy cannot resolve, even where absorption spectra of different cluster sizes overlap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pump–probe strategy could be extended to other dopants for which metastable separations have been predicted (rare gases, halogens, molecules), potentially turning helium nanodroplets into a general testbed for solvent-mediated bond formation.
  • The interpretation implies a testable scaling: if the 450 fs rise is truly nuclear contraction, it should depend on the initial Mg–Mg distance and on the helium solvation shell, and it should change when the droplet size or doping level is varied; a purely electronic origin would show no such dependence.
  • The energy pooling rate could be probed directly by varying the number of excited atoms per droplet (e.g., by attenuating the pump pulse) and checking whether the delayed band amplitude scales quadratically with excitation probability, as expected for a two-excited-atom collision.
  • The contradiction between the DFT prediction of a stable foam and the path-integral Monte Carlo results could be addressed by a time-resolved structural probe, such as femtosecond electron diffraction of the doped droplets, which would directly measure the Mg–Mg distance evolution during the first picosecond.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved photoelectron and photoion measurements on Mg_n aggregates formed in helium nanodroplets, using a 282 nm pump and 404 nm probe. The transient photoelectron spectra show a prompt band attributed to compact van der Waals clusters and a delayed band peaking at about 1.2 ps. A global fitting analysis yields decay-associated spectra and time constants, including a rise time of (450±180) fs for the delayed population, which the authors interpret as the photoinduced collapse of a metastable, foam-like Mg_n configuration (predicted to have 9.5 Å Mg–Mg spacing) into a compact cluster. Electron–ion covariance measurements indicate that only the delayed process leads to ejection of Mg_n^+ fragments from the droplet. The paper further proposes an energy-pooling reaction between excited Mg atoms during cluster formation to explain the population of highly excited atomic states, and discusses conversion of electronic energy into nuclear kinetic energy as the origin of fragmentation.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the experiments constitute a real-time observation of multi-atom bond formation in a quantum solvent, together with a photon upconversion pathway that is relevant for photoinduced chemistry. The experimental work is careful: the data are internally consistent, the global fit is documented with residuals below 10% (Fig. 8), parameter uncertainties are reported (Table I), and the covariance analysis is a strong tool for linking photoelectron bands to ionic products. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the contradictory theoretical predictions for the foam configuration. However, the central claim rests on a disputed theoretical premise that is not independently verified by any observable measured here. The significance is therefore conditional: the methodology and observations are valuable, but the headline interpretation—that a foam-like configuration collapses to a compact cluster on a 450 fs timescale—is not yet established to the strength implied by the abstract and conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [V Conclusions (also Section I)] The central claim that the delayed band peaking at 1.2 ps (DAS2/N2) represents the photoinduced transition from a metastable, foam-like Mg_n configuration to a compact cluster rests on a theoretical premise that the manuscript itself reports as contested. Section I notes that path integral Monte Carlo simulations (Ref. 37) find no metastable stabilization for two or three Mg atoms, in contrast to the static DFT prediction (Ref. 34) of a 9.5 Å separation for two atoms. No observable in the present experiment measures the Mg–Mg distance: the delayed rise, the covariance with Mg_n^+ ions (Fig. 4), and the doping dependence (Fig. 6) are all consistent with the foam model but do not establish the initial geometry. Because the abstract and Conclusions present the foam-to-cluster transition as established, the paper currently overstates its result. The authors should either provide independent experimental evidence for the 9.5 Å spacing (e.g., a structure-sensitive probe) or substantially reframe the interpretation as one possible mechanism among others, with the 450±180 fs time constant labeled as model-dependent.
  2. [VII A, Fig. 6] The experimental aggregates are estimated to contain up to about 16 Mg atoms (Section VII A), whereas the supporting DFT prediction (Ref. 34) is for two Mg atoms and the contradicting PIMC simulation (Ref. 37) covers two and three atoms. The foam hypothesis is therefore extrapolated to cluster sizes that neither simulation addresses. The doping dependence in Fig. 6 provides only indirect support: the decrease of band (2) at high oven current is attributed to spontaneous collapse during pickup (Ref. 22), but this does not constrain the interatomic separation for the sizes relevant to the time-resolved measurement. The manuscript should state clearly which cluster sizes the foam model is applied to and why the simulations are expected to carry over.
  3. [III, Eq. (2)] The delayed rise time τ2^rise = 450±180 fs is obtained by fitting the transient spectra with a sequential population-transfer model (Eq. 2), and this rise time is then interpreted as the cluster-formation time. The fit residual being below 10% (Fig. 8) shows that the chosen model reproduces the data, but it does not demonstrate that the model is unique. A delayed photoelectron rise can also arise from other feeding mechanisms, such as relaxation of the He solvation shell, exciplex formation, or cascaded electronic relaxation within a cluster. Because the assignment of DAS2 to foam collapse is made a priori in the interpretation (Section III, 'Interpretation of DAS populations'), the subsequent use of τ2^rise as the foam-collapse time constant is at least partly circular. The authors should compare the data to alternative kinetic models and/or identify an observable that distinguishes the structural collapse from other delayed population-transfer channels.
  4. [IV, Energy-pooling reaction, Appendix VII C] The proposed energy pooling mechanism is presented as the explanation for the population of highly excited states, but the evidence is circumstantial. The identification of the high-binding-energy tail with specific atomic states (e.g., 4^3S, 4^1S, 3^1D) is based on a qualitative overlap in Fig. 4c with unresolved, broadened features; no resolved atomic lines or quantitative state-to-state populations are reported. The estimate p1 = 0.81±0.15 (Appendix VII C) assumes a gas-phase oscillator strength, a Gaussian line shape with FWHM 4 nm, and a particular beam geometry, and the manuscript does not assess how these assumptions affect the probability that at least two Mg atoms in the same droplet are excited. In its current form the energy pooling mechanism is a reasonable hypothesis but is stated too strongly in the abstract and conclusions. The authors should clearly label it as a proposed mechanism and discuss alternative pathways for populating low-binding-energy states.
minor comments (4)
  1. [II] In Section II, 'the the total electron yield' contains a doubled article; change to 'the total electron yield'.
  2. [III] In the caption of Fig. 2 and in several places in the text, 'van der Waals cluster' should be 'van der Waals clusters' for grammatical agreement; please check the manuscript for similar pluralization errors.
  3. [Abstract and Section I] The 9.5 Å spacing is a prediction for two Mg atoms (Ref. 34), but the abstract refers to it as the interatomic spacing of the Mg_n aggregate without qualification; please specify explicitly that the prediction is for a dimer and that its extension to larger aggregates is an assumption.
  4. [VII A] The estimate that the largest initial cluster size is Mg_16 rests on the assumption that the parent cluster splits in half during pump–probe ionization; this is an assumption rather than a measured quantity and should be flagged as such, with a brief justification or a sensitivity discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the delayed photoelectron band, its global-fit rise time, and the ion-correlation spectrum are independent observables; the disputed 9.5-A foam is an external input, not an output of the paper's equations.

full rationale

The derivation chain in this paper is empirical rather than formal. The delayed band (2) is extracted from time-resolved photoelectron spectra by a global fit whose rise time tau_rise2 = (450 +/- 180) fs is a free parameter (Eq. 2, Table I), not a quantity predicted by the model. Calling this rise time the 'cluster formation' constant is an interpretation of the fit, not a circular reduction, and the covariance measurement in Fig. 4 independently recovers the same population without using the fit parameters. The energy-pooling mechanism is a proposed explanation based on known Mg collisions (Refs 57,58), not a consequence of the fit. The paper's one potentially load-bearing premise, the existence of a 9.5-A Mg foam, is explicitly flagged in the Conclusions as disputed: static DFT (Ref 34) predicts it, while path-integral Monte Carlo (Ref 37) does not. That is an externally falsifiable scientific disagreement, and the prior same-group experiments (Refs 22,28,31,33) are independent empirical support, so per the stated rules they do not raise the circularity score. No equation equates an input to an output by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one disputed premise (existence of the foam at 9.5 Å spacing) and a kinetic model assigning the fitted rise time to nuclear collapse. The excitation probability estimate adds assumptions about helium-induced line broadening, unchanged Einstein A coefficients, and Gaussian beam parameters. The energy-pooling mechanism is a proposed pathway rather than a derived result, so it is carried as an ad hoc assumption. No new fundamental entities are introduced; the foam and Mg2* intermediate are adopted from prior work or proposed as reaction intermediates.

free parameters (6)
  • N2 rise time τ2_rise = 450 ± 180 fs
    Global fit parameter for the delayed photoelectron band, interpreted as the cluster formation time, the central quantitative claim.
  • N2 decay time τ2 = 4000 ± 900 fs
    Global fit decay of the delayed band.
  • N1 decay time τ1 = 380 ± 70 fs
    Fast decay of the compact-cluster band.
  • N3 decay time τ3 = 1090 ± 90 fs
    Decay of the Mg 3^1P1 atomic band.
  • Instrument response σ = 170 ± 15 fs
    Gaussian width in the global fit; affects all extracted decay times.
  • Background rise time, low binding energy region = 3300 ± 1200 fs
    Additional rising background in the low binding energy region of the fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Mg atoms can be stabilized in a metastable 'foam' configuration with about 9.5 Å spacing inside He nanodroplets
    DFT prediction (Ref. 34) used to interpret the delayed band; the paper notes PIMC simulations (Ref. 37) find no such metastable state. See Introduction and Conclusions.
  • domain assumption The 3^1P1 <- 3^1S0 transition in He droplets is blue-shifted and broadened to about 4 nm, and the Einstein A coefficient is unchanged in helium
    Used to compute the absorption cross section and excitation probability p1 = 0.81 in Appendix VII C; the unchanged-A-coefficient part is stated as an assumption.
  • domain assumption The delayed photoelectron band arises from population transfer through a sequential two-state model with a single rise and decay time
    Global fitting model, Eq. (2) in Appendix VII B; the interpretation of the rise time as nuclear collapse depends on this kinetic model.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy pooling via an Mg2* intermediate populates the observed high-lying states
    Proposed mechanism to explain states above the pump energy; it is not independently observed or derived. See Section IV, 'Energy-pooling reaction'.
  • domain assumption Photoelectron bands (1) and (2) are separable and correspond to two distinct Mg_n species
    Required for the global fit and for the two-configuration interpretation; supported by doping and covariance measurements but not directly proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-time tracking the energy flow in cluster formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6GPIOOQ7

@misc{pith2026241201458,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-time tracking the energy flow in cluster formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6GPIOOQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01458}
}
abstract

While photodissociation of molecular systems has been extensively studied, the photoinduced formation of chemical bonds remains largely unexplored. Especially for larger aggregates, the electronic and nuclear dynamics involved in the cluster formation process remain elusive. This limitation is rooted in difficulties to prepare reactants at well-defined initial conditions. Here, we overcome this hurdle by exploiting the exceptional solvation properties of helium nanodroplets. We load the droplets with Mg atoms and investigate the dynamical response of the formed Mg$_n$ aggregates to photoexcitation with time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Beside the response expected for conventional Mg$_n$ clusters, consisting of a prompt signal rise and a decay characteristic for van der Waals bonds, the transient spectra also show a delayed photoelectron band peaking at 1.2 ps. This delayed signal rise is characteristic for nuclear dynamics and represents the transition of Mg$_n$ aggregates from a metastable, foam-like configuration, where Mg atoms are stabilized with a previously predicted interatomic spacing of 9.5 A, to a compact cluster. With global fitting analysis and ion-electron coincidence detection, the concerted electronic and nuclear dynamics can be tracked on a fs timescale. We find that cluster formation, proceeding with a ($450\pm180$) fs time constant, is accompanied by the population of highly-excited atomic states. We propose an energy pooling reaction in collisions of two or more excited Mg atoms during cluster formation as the mechanism leading to population of these high-lying Mg states. Additionally, conversion to kinetic energy through electronic relaxation leads to fragmentation and ejection of ionic cluster fragments from the He droplet. These results underline the potential of He droplets for time-resolved studies of bond formation and to uncover involved processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01458 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the photoinduced dynamics of single Mg atoms, compact Mg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Time-resolved photoelectron spectrum of Mg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ion mass spectra for different pump–probe time de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-resolved photoelectron-photoion covariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time-integrated (0.1 ps to 5 ps) photoelectron spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dependence of the pump-probe photoelectron bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Overview of the global fit analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Sampled probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Numerical probability density for the excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Weinacht and B

    T. Weinacht and B. J. Pearson, Time-resolved spec- troscopy an experimental perspective (Taylor & Francis Group, 2019) p. 358

    2019

  2. [2]

    Stolow, A

    A. Stolow, A. E. Bragg, and D. M. Neumark, Femtosec- ond time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy, Chemical Reviews 104, 1719 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    I. V. Hertel and W. Radloff, Ultrafast dynamics in iso- lated molecules and molecular clusters, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 1897 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    Kobayashi, K

    Y. Kobayashi, K. F. Chang, T. Zeng, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, Direct mapping of curve-crossing dy- namics in IBr by attosecond transient absorption spec- troscopy, Science 365, 79 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Arasaki, K

    Y. Arasaki, K. Takatsuka, K. Wang, and V. McKoy, Pump-probe photoionization study of the passage and bifurcation of a quantum wave packet across an avoided crossing, Physical Review Letters 90, 248303 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Mokhtari, P

    A. Mokhtari, P. Cong, J. L. Herek, and A. H. Zewail, Direct femtosecond mapping of trajectories in a chemical 9 reaction, Nature 348, 225 (1990)

    1990

  7. [7]

    A. D. G. Nunn, R. S. Minns, R. Spesyvtsev, M. J. Bearpark, M. A. Robb, and H. H. Fielding, Ultrafast dynamics through conical intersections and intramolecu- lar vibrational energy redistribution in styrene, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 12, 15751 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    M. Koch, B. Thaler, P. Heim, and W. E. Ernst, The role of rydberg–valence coupling in the ultrafast relaxation dynamics of acetone, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 121, 6398 (2017)

    2017

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Fioretti, D

    A. Fioretti, D. Comparat, A. Crubellier, O. Dulieu, F. Masnou-Seeuws, and P. Pillet, Formation of cold Cs2 molecules through photoassociation, Physical Re- view Letters 80, 4402 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    K. M. Jones, E. Tiesinga, P. D. Lett, and P. S. Juli- enne, Ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy: long- range molecules and atomic scattering, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 78, 483 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    N. V. Vitanov, T. Halfmann, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Laser-induced population transfer by adi- abatic passage techniques, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 52, 763 (2001)

    2001

  4. [12]

    Marvet and M

    U. Marvet and M. Dantus, Femtosecond photoassocia- tion spectroscopy: coherent bond formation, Chemical Physics Letters 245, 393 (1995)

    1995

  5. [13]

    Rybak, S

    L. Rybak, S. Amaran, L. Levin, M. Tomza, R. Moszynski, R. Kosloff, C. P. Koch, and Z. Amitay, Generating molec- ular rovibrational coherence by two-photon femtosecond photoassociation of thermally hot atoms, Physical Re- view Letters 107, 273001 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Rybak, Z

    L. Rybak, Z. Amitay, S. Amaran, R. Kosloff, M. Tomza, R. Moszynski, and C. P. Koch, Femtosecond coherent control of thermal photoassociation of magnesium atoms, Faraday Discussions 153, 383 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    N. F. Scherer, L. R. Khundkar, R. B. Bernstein, and A. H. Zewail, Real-time picosecond clocking of the colli- sion complex in a bimolecular reaction: the birth of OH from H + CO2, The Journal of Chemical Physics87, 1451 (1987)

    1987

  8. [16]

    Gruebele, I

    M. Gruebele, I. R. Sims, E. D. Potter, and A. H. Zewail, Femtosecond probing of bimolecular reactions: the colli- sion complex, The Journal of Chemical Physics 95, 7763 (1991)

    1991

  9. [17]

    E. D. Potter, J. L. Herek, S. Pedersen, Q. Liu, and A. H. Zewail, Femtosecond laser control of a chemical reaction, Nature 355, 66 (1992)

    1992

  10. [18]

    Stert, P

    V. Stert, P. Farmanara, H.-H. Ritze, W. Radloff, K. Gasmi, and A. Gonzalez-Urena, Femtosecond time- resolved electron spectroscopy of the intracluster reaction in baFCH3, Chemical Physics Letters 337, 299 (2001)

    2001

  11. [19]

    Wester, A

    R. Wester, A. E. Bragg, A. V. Davis, and D. M. Neu- mark, Time-resolved study of the symmetric Sn2-reaction I− + CH3I, The Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 10032 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    K. H. Kim, J. G. Kim, S. Nozawa, T. Sato, K. Y. Oang, T. W. Kim, H. Ki, J. Jo, S. Park, C. Song, T. Sato, K. Ogawa, T. Togashi, K. Tono, M. Yabashi, T. Ishikawa, J. Kim, R. Ryoo, J. Kim, H. Ihee, and S. ichi Adachi, Direct observation of bond formation in solution with femtose...

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. H. Lee, M. Wulff, S. Bratos, J. Petersen, L. Guerin, J.-C. Leicknam, M. Cammarata, Q. Kong, J. Kim, K. B. Møller, and H. Ihee, Filming the birth of molecules and accompanying solvent rearrangement, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 3255 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Kazak, K.-H

    L. Kazak, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, and J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, Ionization potentials of Mg N (N = 7–56) clusters formed by spontaneous collapse of magnesium foam in helium nanodroplets, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 24, 23350 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    J. P. Toennies and A. F. Vilesov, Superfluid helium droplets: a uniquely cold nanomatrix for molecules and molecular complexes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2622 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Callegari and W

    C. Callegari and W. E. Ernst, Helium droplets as nanocryostats for molecular spectroscopy - from the vac- uum ultraviolet to the microwave regime, in Handbook of High Resolution Spectroscopy, edited by F. Merkt and M. Quack (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    W. E. Ernst and A. W. Hauser, Metal clusters synthe- sized in helium droplets: structure and dynamics from experiment and theory, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 23, 7553 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Slenczka and J

    A. Slenczka and J. P. Toennies, eds., Molecules in super- fluid helium nanodroplets: spectroscopy, structure, and dynamics (Springer International Publishing, 2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    S. H. Albrechtsen, C. A. Schouder, A. Vi˜ nas Mu˜ noz, J. K. Christensen, C. Engelbrecht Petersen, M. Pi, M. Bar- ranco, and H. Stapelfeldt, Observing the primary steps of ion solvation in helium droplets, Nature 623, 319 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Kazak, S

    L. Kazak, S. G¨ ode, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, and J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, Photoelectron spectroscopy on magnesium ensembles in helium nanodroplets, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 123, 5951 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Lackner and W

    F. Lackner and W. E. Ernst, Photoinduced molecule formation of spatially separated atoms on helium nan- odroplets, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, 3561 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Kautsch, M

    A. Kautsch, M. Koch, and W. E. Ernst, Photoinduced molecular dissociation and photoinduced recombination mediated by superfluid helium nanodroplets, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 17, 12310 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    G¨ ode, R

    S. G¨ ode, R. Irsig, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and K.-H. Meiwes- Broer, Time-resolved studies on the collapse of magne- sium atom foam in helium nanodroplets, New Journal of Physics 15, 015026 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    J. Poms, A. W. Hauser, and W. E. Ernst, Helium nan- odroplets doped with xenon and rubidium atoms: a case study of van der waals interactions between heliophilic and heliophobic dopants, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 14, 15158 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Przystawik, S

    A. Przystawik, S. G¨ ode, T. D¨ oppner, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, Light-induced collapse of metastable magnesium complexes formed in helium nanodroplets, Physical Review A 78, 10.1103/Phys- RevA.78.021202 (2008)

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Hernando, M

    A. Hernando, M. Barranco, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and F. An- cilotto, Density functional theory of the structure of magnesium-doped helium nanodroplets, Physical Review B 78, 10.1103/physrevb.78.184515 (2008)

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    Eloranta, Self-assembly of neon into a quantum gel with crystalline structure in superfluid 4He: prediction from density functional theory, Physical Review B 77, 134301 (2008)

    J. Eloranta, Self-assembly of neon into a quantum gel with crystalline structure in superfluid 4He: prediction from density functional theory, Physical Review B 77, 134301 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Eloranta, Theoretical study of quantum gel formation in superfluid 4He, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 162, 718 (2010)

    J. Eloranta, Theoretical study of quantum gel formation in superfluid 4He, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 162, 718 (2010). 10

    2010

  29. [37]

    Krotscheck and R

    E. Krotscheck and R. E. Zillich, Solvation of Mg in helium-4: Are there meta-stable Mg dimers?, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 145, 244317 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Thaler, S

    B. Thaler, S. Ranftl, P. Heim, S. Cesnik, L. Treiber, R. Meyer, A. W. Hauser, W. E. Ernst, and M. Koch, Femtosecond photoexcitation dynamics inside a quantum solvent, Nat. Commun. 9, 4006 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Bruder, M

    L. Bruder, M. Koch, M. Mudrich, and F. Stienkemeier, Ultrafast dynamics in helium droplets, in Molecules in Superfluid Helium Nanodroplets , Topics in Applied Physics, edited by A. Slenczka and J. P. Toennies (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 447–511

    2022

  32. [40]

    Thaler, M

    B. Thaler, M. Meyer, P. Heim, and M. Koch, Long-lived nuclear coherences inside helium nanodroplets, Physical Review Letters 124, 115301 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    J. H. Nielsen, D. Pentlehner, L. Christiansen, B. Shep- person, A. A. Søndergaard, A. S. Chatterley, J. D. Pick- ering, C. A. Schouder, A. V. Mu˜ noz, L. Kranabetter, and H. Stapelfeldt, Laser-induced alignment of molecules in helium nanodroplets, in Molecules in Superfluid He...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Kramida, Yu

    A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.10), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2023, August 11]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    M. Koch, P. Heim, B. Thaler, M. Kitzler, and W. E. Ernst, Direct observation of a photochemical activation energy: a case study of acetone photodissociation, Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 50, 125102 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    L. J. Frasinski, K. Codling, and P. A. Hatherly, Covari- ance mapping: a correlation method applied to multi- photon multiple ionization, Science 246, 1029 (1989)

    1989

  37. [45]

    Mikosch and S

    J. Mikosch and S. Patchkovskii, Coincidence and covari- ance data acquisition in photoelectron and -ion spec- troscopy. I. Formal theory, Journal of Modern Optics60, 1426 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Mikosch and S

    J. Mikosch and S. Patchkovskii, Coincidence and covari- ance data acquisition in photoelectron and -ion spec- troscopy. II. Analysis and applications, Journal of Mod- ern Optics 60, 1439 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    I. H. van Stokkum, D. S. Larsen, and R. van Gron- delle, Global and target analysis of time-resolved spec- tra, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenerget- ics 1657, 82 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    G. Wu, A. E. Boguslavskiy, O. Schalk, M. S. Schuur- man, and A. Stolow, Ultrafast non-adiabatic dynamics of methyl substituted ethylenes: the π3s rydberg state, The Journal of Chemical Physics 135, (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    D. E. Couch, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, and W. K. Peters, Uncovering highly-excited state mixing in acetone using ultrafast VUV pulses and coincidence imaging tech- niques, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 121, 2361 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Maierhofer, M

    P. Maierhofer, M. Bainschab, B. Thaler, P. Heim, W. E. Ernst, and M. Koch, Disentangling multi- channel photodissociation dynamics in acetone by time-resolved photoelectron-photoion coincidence spec- troscopy, J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 6418 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Wilkinson, A

    I. Wilkinson, A. E. Boguslavskiy, J. Mikosch, J. B. Bertrand, H. J. W¨ orner, D. M. Villeneuve, M. Span- ner, S. Patchkovskii, and A. Stolow, Excited state dy- namics in SO 2. I. bound state relaxation studied by time-resolved photoelectron-photoion coincidence spec- troscopy,...

    2014

  44. [52]

    Stadlhofer, B

    M. Stadlhofer, B. Thaler, and M. Koch, Dimer photofrag- mentation and cation ejection dynamics in helium nan- odroplets, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 24, 24727 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Braun and M

    A. Braun and M. Drabbels, Photodissociation of alkyl io- dides in helium nanodroplets. I. Kinetic energy transfer, The Journal of Chemical Physics127, 10.1063/1.2767261 (2007)

    2007 doi

  46. [54]

    D¨ oppner, T

    T. D¨ oppner, T. Fennel, T. Diederich, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and K. H. Meiwes-Broer, Controlling the coulomb ex- plosion of silver clusters by femtosecond dual-pulse laser excitation, Physical Review Letters 94, 013401 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    I. A. Solov’yov, A. V. Solov’yov, and W. Greiner, Op- tical response of small magnesium clusters, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 37, L137 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    Shinde and A

    R. Shinde and A. Shukla, First principles electron- correlated calculations of optical absorption in magne- sium clusters, The European Physical Journal D 71, 301 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Kopysty´ nska and L

    A. Kopysty´ nska and L. Moi, Energy transfer in collisions between excited atoms, Physics Reports 92, 135 (1982)

    1982

  50. [58]

    Husain and G

    D. Husain and G. Roberts, Kinetic study of Mg(3 3PJ), Mg(31P1) and Mg(4 3S1), including energy pooling, fol- lowing pulsed dye-laser excitation at λ = 457.1 nm [Mg(33P1) ← Mg(31S0)], J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 82, 21 (1986)

    1986

  51. [59]

    Amaran, R

    S. Amaran, R. Kosloff, M. Tomza, W. Skomorowski, F. Paw lowski, R. Moszynski, L. Rybak, L. Levin, Z. Ami- tay, J. M. Berglund, D. M. Reich, and C. P. Koch, Femtosecond two-photon photoassociation of hot magne- sium atoms: a quantum dynamical study using thermal random phase wa...

    2013

  52. [60]

    Kn¨ ockel, S

    H. Kn¨ ockel, S. R¨ uhmann, and E. Tiemann, The A1Σ+ u system of Mg 2, The European Physical Journal D 68, 293 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    Diederich, T

    T. Diederich, T. D¨ oppner, T. Fennel, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, Shell structure of magnesium and other divalent metal clusters, Physical Review A 72, 023203 (2005)

    2005

  54. [62]

    Jellinek and P

    J. Jellinek and P. H. Acioli, Magnesium clusters: struc- tural and electronic properties and the size-induced nonmetal-to-metal transition, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 106, 10919 (2002)

    2002

  55. [63]

    Schirato, M

    A. Schirato, M. Maiuri, G. Cerullo, and G. Della Valle, Ultrafast hot electron dynamics in plasmonic nanostruc- tures: experiments, modelling, design, Nanophotonics 12, 1 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Hertel, E

    T. Hertel, E. Knoesel, M. Wolf, and G. Ertl, Ultrafast electron dynamics at Cu(111): response of an electron gas to optical excitation, Physical Review Letters76, 535 (1996)

    1996

  57. [65]

    R. M. Young, G. B. Griffin, O. T. Ehrler, A. Kamm- rath, A. E. Bragg, J. R. R. Verlet, O. Cheshnovsky, and D. M. Neumark, Charge carrier dynamics in semi- conducting mercury cluster anions, Physica Scripta 80, 11 048102 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Diederich, T

    T. Diederich, T. D¨ oppner, J. Braune, J. Tiggesb¨ aumker, and K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, Electron delocalization in mag- nesium clusters grown in supercold helium droplets, Physical Review Letters 86, 4807 (2001)

    2001

  59. [67]

    O. C. Thomas, W. Zheng, S. Xu, and K. H. Bowen, On- set of metallic behavior in magnesium clusters, Physical Review Letters 89, 213403 (2002)

    2002

  60. [68]

    Coppens, F

    F. Coppens, F. Ancilotto, M. Barranco, N. Halberstadt, and M. Pi, Dynamics of impurity clustering in superfluid 4He nanodroplets, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 21, 17423 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Garc ´ ıa-Alfonso, M

    E. Garc ´ ıa-Alfonso, M. Barranco, D. A. Bonhommeau, N. Halberstadt, M. Pi, and F. Calvo, Clustering, colli- sion, and relaxation dynamics in pure and doped helium nanoclusters: Density- vs particle-based approaches, The Journal of Chemical Physics 157, 014106 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Fixot, E

    B. Fixot, E. Louaas, and D. A. Bonhommeau, Collision of rare-gas atoms on helium nanodroplets: Theoretical evi- dence for an efficient coagulation of heavy rare-gas atoms, The Journal of Chemical Physics 161, 044307 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Trejo, A

    M. Trejo, A. Clifford, E. G. Alfonso, N. Halberstadt, L. Xue, and W. Kong, Electron diffraction of foam-like clusters between xenon and helium in superfluid helium droplets, The Journal of Chemical Physics 161, 054306 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Blancafort-Jorquera, A

    M. Blancafort-Jorquera, A. Vil` a, and M. Gonz´ alez, Quantum-classical approach to the reaction dynamics in a superfluid helium nanodroplet. the Ne 2 dimer and Ne-Ne adduct formation reaction Ne + Ne-doped nanodroplet, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 21, 24218 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Calvo, E

    F. Calvo, E. Yurtsever, and ¨O. Birer, Possible forma- tion of metastable pah dimers upon pickup by helium droplets, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 120, 1727 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    Lewerenz, B

    M. Lewerenz, B. Schilling, and J. P. Toennies, Succes- sive capture and coagulation of atoms and molecules to small clusters in large liquid helium clusters, Journal of Chemical Physics 102, 8191 (1995)

    1995

  67. [75]

    Lottner and A

    E.-M. Lottner and A. Slenczka, Anthracene–argon clus- ters generated in superfluid helium nanodroplets: new as- pects on cluster formation and microsolvation, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry A 124, 311 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Calvo and E

    F. Calvo and E. Yurtsever, The metastable structures of anthracene-argon clusters inside helium nanodroplets, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 140, 21 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    E. B. Gordon, L. P. Mezhov-Deglin, and O. F. Pugachev, Stabilization of nitrogen atoms in superfluid helium, Let- ters to JETP 19, 103 (1974)

    1974

  70. [78]

    Gordon, Impurity condensation in liquid and solid he- lium, Low temperature physics 30, 756 (2004)

    E. Gordon, Impurity condensation in liquid and solid he- lium, Low temperature physics 30, 756 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    V. B. Efimov, A. N. Izotov, and L. P. Mezhov-Deglin, Helium impurity nanocluster gels in superfluid helium, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 77, 48 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    L. T. Mezhov-Deglin and A. M. Kokotin, Condensed wa- ter in superfluid He-II, Journal of Experimental and The- oretical Physics Letters 70, 756 (1999)

    1999

  73. [81]

    Nauta and R

    K. Nauta and R. E. Miller, Nonequilibrium self-assembly of long chains of polar molecules in superfluid helium, Science 283, 1895 (1999)

    1999

  74. [82]

    J. Reho, C. Callegari, J. Higgins, W. E. Ernst, K. K. Lehmann, and G. Scoles, Spin–orbit effects in the forma- tion of the na–he excimer on the surface of he clusters, Faraday Discussions 108, 161 (1997)

    1997

  75. [83]

    C. P. Schulz, P. Claas, and F. Stienkemeier, Formation of K∗He exciplexes on the surface of helium nanodroplets studied in real time, Physical Review Letters 87, 153401 (2001)

    2001

  76. [84]

    Droppelmann, O

    G. Droppelmann, O. B¨ unermann, C. P. Schulz, and F. Stienkemeier, Formation times of RbHe exciplexes on the surface of superfluid versus normal fluid helium nan- odroplets, Physical Review Letters 93, 023402 (2004)

    2004

  77. [85]

    M. P. Ziemkiewicz, D. M. Neumark, and O. Gessner, Ultrafast electronic dynamics in helium nanodroplets, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 34, 239 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    Bolze, S

    F. Bolze, S. Jenni, A. Sour, and V. Heitz, Molecular photosensitisers for two-photon photodynamic therapy, Chemical Communications 53, 12857 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    Haase and H

    M. Haase and H. Sch¨ afer, Upconverting nanoparti- cles, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50, 5808 (2011)

    2011

  80. [88]

    D. H. Weingarten, M. D. LaCount, J. van de Lagemaat, G. Rumbles, M. T. Lusk, and S. E. Shaheen, Experi- mental demonstration of photon upconversion via coop- erative energy pooling, Nature Communications 8, 14808 (2017)

    2017

  81. [89]

    R. C. Hilborn, Einstein coefficients, cross sections, dipole moments, and all that, American Journal of Physics 50, 982 (1982)

    1982

  82. [90]

    D. E. Kelleher and L. I. Podobedova, Atomic transition probabilities of sodium and magnesium. a critical compi- lation, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 37, 267 (2008)

    2008

  83. [91]

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of pho- tonics (wiley series in pure and applied optics) (Wiley- Interscience, 2007) p. 1177. 12 VII. APPENDIX A. Generation and doping of He droplets We generate He droplets by expanding high-purity He through a 5 µm diameter nozzl...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.