Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Facilitating field-free perpendicular magnetization switching with a Berry curvature dipole in a Weyl semimetal

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A current along WTe2's a-axis induces an out-of-plane orbital magnetization that enables field-free perpendicular magnetization switching of an adjacent Fe3GeTe2 layer.

desk verdict Solid two-torque control scheme and BCD-correlated magnetization detection; the orbital-dominance claim needs a spin Hall calculation to hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02491 v1 pith:FYTVINJF submitted 2024-12-03 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dong Li , Xing-Yu Liu , Xing-Guo Ye , Zhen-Cun Pan , Wen-Zheng Xu , Peng-Fei Zhu , An-Qi Wang , Kenji Watanabe
show 2 more authors
Takashi Taniguchi Zhi-Min Liao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbitalEdelsteineffectBerrycurvaturedipolefield-freeswitchingWTe2spin-orbittorqueperpendicularmagnetizationFe3GeTe2vanderWaalsheterostructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a current along the a axis of the Weyl semimetal WTe2 induces an out-of-plane orbital magnetization in WTe2 itself, arising from the Berry curvature dipole of its band structure. The resulting orbital torque, rather than conventional spin-orbit torque, is claimed to be what enables deterministic switching of an adjacent perpendicularly magnetized Fe3GeTe2 layer with no applied magnetic field. The authors further show that a small direct current along the a axis and a pulsed current along the b axis independently control orbital and spin-orbit torques, allowing full or partial switching and a route to multilevel memory. First-principles calculations support the orbital Edelstein origin, with the computed out-of-plane orbital magnetization two orders of magnitude larger than the spin magnetization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Berry curvature dipole $D_{xz}$ of low-symmetry few-layer WTe2, together with the orbital magnetic moment texture $m^z_{\mathrm{orb}}$ that mirrors the antisymmetric Berry curvature $\Omega_z(k_x,k_y) = -\Omega_z(-k_x,k_y)$. An electric field along the a axis drives a nonequilibrium out-of-plane orbital magnetization (orbital Edelstein effect) through the coefficient $\alpha_{xz} \approx -\mu D_{xz}$, which produces an out-of-plane antidamping-like torque on the adjacent Fe3GeTe2 layer. The two-current scheme (a-axis DC for orbital torque, b-axis pulsed current for spin-orbit torque) allows independent control of the two torque components.

What would settle it

If an independent probe of the WTe2 magnetization, such as magnetic circular dichroism or a scanning NV magnetometer, found no out-of-plane magnetization when a current is driven along the a axis, the orbital Edelstein torque explanation would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the orbital Edelstein effect, driven by the Berry curvature dipole of few-layer Td-WTe2, produces a current-induced out-of-plane magnetization that exerts an out-of-plane antidamping-like torque on an adjacent Fe3GeTe2 layer, thereby enabling field-free perpendicular magnetization switching. Experiments detect the current-induced out-of-plane magnetization using a Fe3GeTe2 magnetic probe electrode separated by a h-BN tunnel barrier; the signal is linear in current, follows a cosine angle dependence with maximum along the a axis, and vanishes along the b axis. First-principles calculations attribute the dominant part of the orbital Edelstein coefficient to the Berry curvature dipole term $-\mu D_{xz}$ at the experimental Fermi level, and the calculated orbital magnetization is about two orders of magnitude larger than the spin magnetization. When a small DC current along the a axis is combined with a pulsed current along the b axis, the orbital and spin-orbit torques act jointly: the sign of the DC current sets the final magnetization direction, and larger DC currents yield more complete switching, consistent with micromagnetic simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation that the voltage hysteresis measured between the Fe3GeTe2 probe electrode and a gold reference electrode reflects the relative alignment of a current-induced orbital magnetization in WTe2 with the Fe3GeTe2 magnetization, rather than a spin-dependent magnetoresistance of the Fe3GeTe2 interface, is the load-bearing premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Field-free perpendicular magnetization switching can be achieved without symmetry-breaking layers or external magnetic fields, using only the intrinsic Berry curvature dipole of a low-symmetry Weyl semimetal.
  • The orbital torque, rather than spin-orbit torque, is the dominant mechanism for currents along the a axis, which changes how such devices should be engineered.
  • Independent control of orbital and spin-orbit torques enables full, partial, and multilevel magnetization states, offering a path to multilevel nonvolatile memory and neuromorphic computing.
  • An all-van-der-Waals magnetic tunnel junction can be written electrically through the WTe2 layer, with a tunneling magnetoresistance of about 10 percent at low temperature.
  • The switching polarity is set by the sign of the a-axis current, not by Joule heating, since equal currents with opposite signs produce opposite final magnetization states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Berry curvature dipole mechanism should be transferable to other low-symmetry type-II Weyl semimetals such as TaIrTe4, and could be tunable by strain, twist, or electrostatic gating.
  • The magnetic-probe detection scheme could be adapted to quantify current-induced orbital magnetization in other materials, but its reliance on the ferromagnetic probe means a nonmagnetic tunnel probe would provide a cleaner control experiment.
  • The demonstrated partial switching states suggest a natural route to analog synaptic devices, although device-to-device reproducibility of the partial states remains to be tested.
  • The dominance of orbital over spin magnetization is established by comparing computed orbital and spin Edelstein coefficients; a direct experimental separation of orbital and spin torque contributions, for example through thickness- or angle-dependent torque measurements, would further solidify the claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports current-induced out-of-plane magnetization in few-layer WTe2, detected through a Fe3GeTe2 (FGT) magnetic probe electrode, and attributes it to the orbital Edelstein effect arising from the Berry curvature dipole (BCD). Based on first-principles calculations, the authors argue that the out-of-plane orbital magnetization is about two orders of magnitude larger than the spin magnetization at the estimated Fermi level, and that this orbital magnetization produces an out-of-plane antidamping-like torque enabling field-free perpendicular magnetization switching of an adjacent FGT layer. They further demonstrate a two-current scheme (DC along the a axis, pulses along the b axis) that separately controls orbital and spin-orbit torques, supported by anomalous Hall loop-shift measurements and micromagnetic simulations. The manuscript also includes an all-van-der-Waals magnetoresistive memory demonstration.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, the work would establish the Berry-curvature-dipole-induced orbital Edelstein effect as a functional torque source for field-free perpendicular switching, complementing the well-studied spin-orbit torque channel in low-symmetry semimetals. The paper combines several independent pieces of evidence: nonlinear Hall effect characterization, magnetization detection with angle and current dependence, first-principles orbital and spin Edelstein calculations, micromagnetic modeling, and reproducible switching in multiple devices. The two-torque independent-control scheme is an appealing and potentially useful device concept. The experimental data are presented in detail, including control measurements with nonmagnetic electrodes and heating-effect discussions. However, the quantitative attribution of the observed torque to the orbital rather than the spin Hall channel, and the interpretation of the probe-electrode signal, require additional support before the central claim is fully secured.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 and Supplemental Note 6] The magnetization-detection measurement uses a FGT electrode as the magnetic probe, and the hysteresis in V_m^omega is interpreted as the relative alignment of a current-induced out-of-plane WTe2 magnetization with MFGT. The control measurement with two Au electrodes (Fig. S5(a)) rules out a signal originating from proximity-induced magnetism in WTe2, but it does not rule out a spin-dependent magnetoresistance or contact-related effect at the FGT/h-BN/WTe2 interface, which would also produce a hysteresis loop whose polarity reverses with the driving-current direction. An additional control that reverses the magnetization of the FGT probe without changing the WTe2 current direction, or a measurement that directly correlates the sign of V_m^omega with the independently known switching direction in the same device, would strengthen the interpretation.
  2. [Fig. 3(e) and Supplemental Note 7 (Eq. S5)] The claim that the orbital Edelstein effect dominates the out-of-plane antidamping-like torque relies on the comparison in Fig. 3(e), where the computed out-of-plane orbital magnetization exceeds the spin magnetization by about two orders of magnitude. However, the spin contribution is calculated only from the Fermi-surface spin Edelstein coefficient (Eq. S5); it does not include the spin Hall effect, which in WTe2 is known to produce sizable out-of-plane spin currents and corresponding out-of-plane spin-orbit torques. The measured out-of-plane torque efficiency is modest (xi_DL^z = 0.024, Note 11), so the spin Hall channel alone could plausibly account for the observed switching. The authors should either compute the spin Hall contribution to the out-of-plane torque in the same first-principles framework or provide an experimental bound that places the spin Hall contribution below the measured efficiency.
  3. [Supplemental Note 8 and Fig. 3(e)] The Fermi level mu_F = 63 ± 5 meV is extracted from carrier-density measurements on a separate few-layer WTe2 device at 100 K, and this value is then used to compute the orbital and spin magnetization in Fig. 3(e) for the WTe2/FGT heterostructure. The actual heterostructure may have a different doping due to the adjacent FGT and h-BN layers, and the measurement temperature of the switching experiments is 90 K rather than 100 K. Since the ratio M_z^orb/M_z^spin is strongly mu-dependent (Fig. 3(e) shows the spin magnetization changing sign in the shaded region), the quantitative dominance claim would benefit from a sensitivity analysis with respect to mu_F and from an estimate of the Fermi-level uncertainty in the heterostructure itself.
  4. [Supplemental Note 13] The micromagnetic simulations use a canting angle theta to represent the ratio of out-of-plane to in-plane torque components, with theta = -1.09 deg assigned to the case of I_p along b with I_DC = +0.4 mA along a. This mapping is derived from torque efficiencies, but the simulations do not independently implement the orbital torque mechanism; they simply parameterize an out-of-plane antidamping torque. The simulations therefore illustrate that an out-of-plane antidamping torque can produce the observed partial and full switching, but they do not by themselves discriminate between an orbital and a spin-Hall origin. This should be stated more explicitly, and the simulation parameters (e.g., Ms = 1.7e5 A/m, alpha = 0.02) should be justified against the FGT films used in the experiments, whose reported Ms is lower (16 emu/cm^3 = 1.6e4 A/m in Note 11).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'characterized by a Berry curvature dipole' in the abstract is slightly ambiguous; the paper actually demonstrates the BCD via the nonlinear Hall effect and calculates it from first principles, so a wording such as 'in which the Berry curvature dipole is present and characterized' would be clearer.
  2. [Fig. 2(c,d) and Fig. S5(b)] The raw V_m^omega traces show a large background that is subtracted in Fig. 2(c), but the subtraction procedure is only described in a sentence. Please specify how the background is defined (e.g., linear fit outside the hysteresis region) and show at least one raw trace for a-axis and b-axis cases.
  3. [Main text, third paragraph after Eq. (1)] The symbol mu_b is introduced as 'the Bohr magneton' but the more common notation is mu_B; if the paper uses mu_b consistently, please note the convention. Also, in the same sentence 'reaches about 16 mu_b' should specify whether this is per atom, per unit cell, or per k-point; the figure caption states units of mu_b/nm^2 in Fig. 3(e), so consistency is needed.
  4. [Supplemental Note 7, Eq. (S1)] Equation (S1) contains a notation mix: alpha_xz is first written as an integral over m_nk^z v_nk^x d_epsilon f, and then the same symbol alpha_xz is used for the total coefficient after the -mu D_xz + B_xz decomposition. Please distinguish the bare orbital moment contribution from the final alpha_xz and define all symbols (such as b_nk) in the main text before using them.
  5. [Main text, Fig. 4(c,d)] The partial switching of about 65% is described in the text, but the figure panels do not show the full R_xy versus I_p range; adding a dashed line at the expected full-switching level would make the 'partial' claim immediately visible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Core BCD/orbital-Edelstein derivation is independent, but the micromagnetic 'confirmation' is partly circular: its torque-ratio input is taken from the same measured efficiencies.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplemental Note 13 (Micromagnetic simulations); main text discussion of Fig. 4]
    "According to the torque efficiencies of WTe2 obtained in our experiments and reported studies, θ = 0°, θ = −1.09°, and θ = −12° approximately correspond to the cases of Ip along the b-axis alone, Ip along the b-axis with a Idc = +0.4 mA along the a-axis, and Ip along the a-axis alone in our experiments, respectively. By varying the angle θ, magnetization reversal processes with different ratios of the out-of-plane and in-plane anti-damping-like torques are investigated."

    The simulation's control parameter θ is the canting angle setting the ratio of out-of-plane to in-plane antidamping torque. It is fixed using torque efficiencies measured on the same devices (Note 11 extracts ξ_DL^z = 0.024 from the AHE loop shift in Device A). The text then presents the simulated M_z^final(θ) as 'well consistent' with the experimental M_z^final vs I_DC for the same cases, with θ = −1.09° assigned to Idc = +0.4 mA. Since θ is calibrated to those experimental cases, the LLG result is a consistency check that replays the measured torque ratio, not an independent prediction. It cannot independently confirm the orbital-torque mechanism or the 'determinative role of the orbital torque'.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: BCD is measured by NLHE in a separate few-layer WTe2 device (Fig. S1); the orbital and spin Edelstein coefficients are computed from a DFT-Wannier Hamiltonian (Note 7); and the current-induced out-of-plane magnetization is detected with an FGT/h-BN probe, with a nonmagnetic two-electrode control ruling out proximity artifacts (Fig. S5). The Fermi level (μF = 63 ± 5 meV) is pinned to measured carrier densities, not to the switching or torque data, so the first-principles comparison in Fig. 3(e) is not fitted to the claim it supports. The self-citations [34,35] are background and not load-bearing. The only circular element is the supporting micromagnetic simulation: its θ parameter is calibrated using torque efficiencies obtained from the same device measurements, and the resulting M_z^final(θ) is then said to agree with the experimental M_z^final vs I_DC. That agreement is a consistency check rather than an independent prediction. The omission of a quantitative spin Hall channel is a correctness risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the orbital Edelstein theory (from a cited preprint), DFT-based band structure, the measurement interpretation, and a fitted Fermi level and relaxation time. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Relaxation time τ = 1 ps (assumed)
    Used in M_orb = (e^2 τ / 2ℏ^2) α_xz E_x; scaling parameter, not measured in this work.
  • Fermi level μF = 63 ± 5 meV at 100 K
    Determined by matching DFT carrier densities to experimental Hall densities (Note 8); affects α_xz and the orbital/spin magnetization comparison.
  • Micromagnetic spin canting angle θ = 0°, -1.09°, -12° for b-only, b+DC, a-only cases
    Set from experimentally inferred torque efficiencies; used to reproduce switching curves in Mumax3 simulations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The orbital Edelstein susceptibility decomposition α_xz = -μD_xz + B_xz is correct.
    Taken from ref [47] (arXiv preprint); the paper's central theory link is not independently proven here.
  • domain assumption DFT band structure of the five-layer WTe2 slab accurately captures Berry curvature and orbital moments near the Fermi level.
    No convergence tests or exchange-correlation functional comparison are shown; all BCD and Edelstein results depend on this.
  • domain assumption The FGT-probe voltage hysteresis reflects WTe2 orbital magnetization rather than FGT-contact magnetoresistance.
    The measurement interpretation in Fig. 2(a,c) assumes magnetic-moment-dependent chemical potentials; the two-Au control does not fully exclude interface magnetoresistance.
  • domain assumption The parallel resistance model gives the current sharing between WTe2 and FGT.
    Used in Note 4 to estimate the critical current density 8.5×10^6 A/cm²; assumes uniform layer resistivities and no interfacial conduction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Facilitating field-free perpendicular magnetization switching with a Berry curvature dipole in a Weyl semimetal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FYTVINJF

@misc{pith2026241202491,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Facilitating field-free perpendicular magnetization switching with a Berry curvature dipole in a Weyl semimetal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FYTVINJF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02491}
}
read the original abstract

We report the synergy between orbital and spin-orbit torques in WTe2/Fe3GeTe2 heterostructures characterized by a Berry curvature dipole. By applying a current along the a axis in WTe2, we detect an out-of-plane magnetization in the system, which we attribute to nonequilibrium orbital magnetization linked to the Berry curvature dipole based on first-principles calculations, manifesting as the orbital Edelstein effect. This effect generates orbital torques that enable field-free perpendicular magnetization switching. Furthermore, by applying a relatively small current along the a axis and a pulsed current along the b axis in WTe2, we demonstrate controllable field-free magnetization switching of the adjacent Fe3GeTe2 layer, independently manipulating the orbital and spin-orbit torques. Our findings not only enhance the understanding of the collaborative dynamics between these torques but also suggest potential applications in magnetoresistive random-access memory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02491 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of few-layer WTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of magnetization detection in WTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Energy band structure of a five-layer WTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Illustration of measurement configuration. (b) Schematic depiction of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Omiya, E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y . Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Electric-field control of ferromagnetism, Nature (London) 408, 944 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Based on first-principles calculations, we reveal the underlying current- induced orbital magnetization related to BCD, identifying it as a major contribution of the out-of-plane magnetization. We further introduce a different approach via two distinct driving currents, a pulsed current I p along the b axis and a relatively small DC current IDC along the a...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Chappert, A

    C. Chappert, A. Fert, and F. N. Van Dau, The emergence of spin electronics in data storage, Nat. Mater. 6, 813 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    E. B. Myers, D. C. Ralph, J. A. Katine, R. N. Louie, and R. A. Buhrman, Current-induced switching of domains in magnetic multilayer devices, Science 285, 867 (1999)

    1999

  5. [5]

    Apalkov, B

    D. Apalkov, B. Dieny, and J. M. Slaughter, Magnetoresistive random access Memory, Proc. IEEE 104, 1796 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Zelezny, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic sys- tems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Chernyshov, M

    A. Chernyshov, M. Overby, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, Y . Lyanda-Geller, and L. P. Rokhinson, Evidence for reversible control of magnetization in a ferromagnetic material by 5 means of spin-orbit magnetic field, Nat. Phys. 5, 656 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    W.-G. Wang, M. Li, S. Hageman, and C. L. Chien, Electric-field-assisted switching in magnetic tunnel junctions, Nat. Mater. 11, 64 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Liu, C.-F

    L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, Y . Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum, Science 336, 555 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Mihai Miron, G

    I. Mihai Miron, G. Gaudin, S. Auffret, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, S. Pizzini, J. V ogel, and P. Gambardella, Current-driven spin torque induced by the Rashba effect in a ferromagnetic metal layer, Nat. Mater. 9, 230 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Fukami, C

    S. Fukami, C. Zhang, S. DuttaGupta, A. Kurenkov, and H. Ohno, Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet-ferromagnet bilayer system, Nat. Mater. 15, 535 (2016). [ 1 2 ] Y . - C .L a u ,D .B e t t o ,K .R o d e ,J .M .D .C o e y ,a n dP .S t a m e n o v ...

    2016

  4. [12]

    A. R. Mellnik, J. S. Lee, A. Richardella, J. L. Grab, P. J. Mintun, M. H. Fischer, A. Vaezi, A. Manchon, E. A. Kim, N. Samarth et al., Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator, Nature (London) 511, 449 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Y . Fan, J. G. Alzate, W. Jiang, K. L. Wong, S. Takei, S. A. Bender, L.-T. Chang, Y . Jiang et al., Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 548 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    L. Liu, C. Zhou, X. Shu, C. Li, T. Zhao, W. Lin, J. Deng, Q. Xie, S. Chen, J. Zhou et al., Symmetry-dependent field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 277 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    M. Wang, W. Cai, D. Zhu, Z. Wang, J. Kan, Z. Zhao, K. Cao, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, T. Zhang et al., Field-free switching of a perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction through the interplay of spin-orbit and spin-transfer torques, Nat. Electron. 1, 582 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological transport, P h y s .R e v .L e t t .99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Y . Fan, P. Upadhyaya, X. Kou, M. Lang, S. Takei, Z. Wang, J. Tang, L. He, L.-T. Chang, M. Montazeri et al., Magnetization switching through giant spin-orbit torque in a magnetically doped topological insulator heterostructure, Nat. Mater. 13, 699 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    W. Han, R. K. Kawakami, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Graphene spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 794 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science 363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, and S. O. Valenzuela, Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto-spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 856 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials, P h y s .R e v .L e t t .115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few-layer WTe 2, Nat. Mater. 18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y . Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V . Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsuet al., Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time-reversal-symmetric con- ditions, Nature (London) 565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, N a t .R e v .P h y s .3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Kumar, C.-H

    D. Kumar, C.-H. Hsu, R. Sharma, T.-R. Chang, P. Yu, J. Wang, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, Room-temperature nonlinear Hall effect and wireless radiofrequency rectification in Weyl semimetal TaIrTe 4, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 421 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    S. R. Park, C. H. Kim, J. Yu, J. H. Han, and C. Kim, Orbital- angular-momentum based origin of rashba-type surface band splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 156803 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    T. Yoda, T. Yokoyama, and S. Murakami, Orbital Edelstein effect as a condensed-matter analog of solenoids, Nano Lett. 18, 916 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    D. Hara, M. S. Bahramy, and S. Murakami, Current-induced orbital magnetization in systems without inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 102, 184404 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    El Hamdi, J.-Y

    A. El Hamdi, J.-Y . Chauleau, M. Boselli, C. Thibault, C. Gorini, A. Smogunov, C. Barreteau, S. Gariglio, J.-M. Triscone, and M. Viret, Observation of the orbital inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect, Nat. Phys. 19, 1855 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    S. Ding, Z. Liang, D. Go, C. Yun, M. Xue, Z. Liu, S. Becker, W. Yang, H. Du, C. Wanget al., Observation of the orbital Rashba- Edelstein magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 067201 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    X. Chen, Y . Liu, G. Yang, H. Shi, C. Hu, M. Li, and H. Zeng, Giant antidamping orbital torque originating from the or- bital Rashba-Edelstein effect in ferromagnetic heterostructures, Nat. Commun. 9, 2569 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    S. Ding, A. Ross, D. Go, L. Baldrati, Z. Ren, F. Freimuth, S. Becker, F. Kammerbauer, J. Yang, G. Jakob et al., Harnessing orbital-to-spin conversion of interfacial orbital currents for effi- cient spin-orbit torques, P h y s .R e v .L e t t .125, 177201 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Ye, P.-F

    X.-G. Ye, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, N. Shang, K. Liu, and Z.-M. Liao, Orbit-transfer torque driven field-free switching of per- pendicular magnetization, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 037303 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Z.-C. Pan, D. Li, X.-G. Ye, Z. Chen, Z.-H. Chen, A.-Q. Wang, M. Tian, G. Yao, K. Liu, and Z.-M. Liao, Room-temperature orbit-transfer torque enabling van der Waals magnetoresistive memories, Sci. Bull. 68, 2743 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D. Guimaraes, R. A. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. C. Ralph, Control of spin-orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe 2/ferromagnet bilayers, Nat. Phys. 13, 300 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    S. Shi, S. Liang, Z. Zhu, K. Cai, S. D. Pollard, Y . Wang, J. Wang, Q. Wang, P. He, J. Yu et al., All-electric magne- tization switching and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in WTe 2/ferromagnet heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 945 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    I. H. Kao, R. Muzzio, H. Zhang, M. Zhu, J. Gobbo, S. Yuan, D. Weber, R. Rao, J. Li, J. H. Edgaret al., Deterministic switching of a perpendicularly polarized magnet using unconventional spin-orbit torques in WTe 2, Nat. Mater. 21, 1029 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Zhang, H

    Y . Zhang, H. Xu, K. Jia, G. Lan, Z. Huang, B. He, C. He, Q. Shao, Y . Wang, M. Zhao et al., Room temperature field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin-orbit torque originating from low-symmetry type II Weyl semimetal, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg9819 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Y . Liu, G. Shi, D. Kumar, T. Kim, S. Shi, D. Yang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Yang et al., Field-free switching of 6 perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of- plane spins from TaIrTe4, Nat. Electron. 6, 732 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Type-II Weyl semimetals, Nature (London) 527, 495 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu,S. Wu, J.Zhu et al., Gate-tunable room-temperature fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature (London) 563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May et al., Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2, Nat. Mater. 17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Wang, P.-Z

    A.-Q. Wang, P.-Z. Xiang, X.-G. Ye, W.-Z. Zheng, D. Yu, and Z.-M. Liao, Room-temperature manipulation of spin texture in a Dirac semimetal, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054044 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    C. H. Li, O. M. J. van ’t Erve, J. T. Robinson, Y. Liu, L. Li, and B. T. Jonker, Electrical detection of charge-current-induced spin polarization due to spin-momentum locking in Bi2Se3, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 218 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    F. Yang, S. Ghatak, A. A. Taskin, K. Segawa, Y. Ando, M. Shiraishi, Y. Kanai, K. Matsumoto, A. Rosch, and Y. Ando, Switching of charge-current-induced spin polarization in the topological insulator BiSbTeSe2, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075304 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    D. G. Ovalle, A. Pezo, and A. Manchon, Orbital Kerr ef- fect and terahertz detection via the nonlinear Hall effect, arXiv:2311.11889

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    B. Sun, S. Ranjan, G. Zhou, T. Guo, Y. Xia, L. Wei, Y. N. Zhou, and Y. A. Wu, Multistate resistive switching behaviors for neuromorphic computing in memristor, Mater. Today Adv. 9, 100125 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Chakraborty, A

    I. Chakraborty, A. Jaiswal, A. K. Saha, S. K. Gupta, and K. Roy, Pathways to efficient neuromorphic computing with non-volatile memory technologies, Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 021308 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    H. Lin, N. Xu, D. Wang, L. Liu, X. Zhao, Y. Zhou, X. Luo, C. Song, G. Yu, and G. Xing, Implementation of highly reliable and energy-efficient nonvolatile in-memory computing using multistate domain wall spin-orbit torque device, Adv. Intell Syst. 4, 2200028 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    In summary, we have demonstrated the synergy be- tween orbital and spin-orbit torques in WTe 2/Fe3GeTe2 heterostructures

    (see Supplemental Material Note 13 [52]), which align well with the experimental findings, underscoring the determi- native role of the orbital torque in the field-free PM switching process. In summary, we have demonstrated the synergy be- tween orbital and spin-orbit torques in...

  44. [52]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and ver- ification of MuMax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    See Supplemental Material for device fabrication and measurement methods, nonlinear Hall effect in a few layer WTe2 device, additional data of device A, critical current density with the parallel current model, all van der Waals magnetoresistive memory device, additional data ...

  46. [54]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, P h y s .R e v .B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  47. [55]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands,P h y s .R e v .B65, 035109 (2001)

    2001

  48. [56]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally- localised Wannier functions,Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    S. S. Tsirkin, High performance Wannier interpolation of Berry curvature and related quantities with WannierBerri code, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 33 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Zhong, J

    S. Zhong, J. E. Moore, and I. Souza, Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the Fermi surface,P h y s .R e v .L e t t . 116, 077201 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Julliere, Tunneling between ferromagnetic films, Phys

    M. Julliere, Tunneling between ferromagnetic films, Phys. Lett. A 54, 225 (1975)

    1975

  52. [60]

    Y . Wu, N. H. Jo, M. Ochi, L. Huang, D. Mou, S. L. B u d ’ k o ,P . C .C a n fi e l d ,N .T r i v e d i ,R .A r i t a ,a n dA .K a m i n s k i , Temperature-induced Lifshitz transition in WTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 166602 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Fatemi, Q

    V . Fatemi, Q. D. Gibson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. J. Cava, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Magnetoresistance and quantum oscillations of an electrostatically tuned semimetal-to-metal transition in ultrathin WTe 2, P h y s .R e v .B95, 041410(R) (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P. J. Zermatten, M. V . Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection, Nature (London) 476, 189 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    S. C. Baek, V . P. Amin, Y . W. Oh, G. Go, S. J. Lee, G. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, M. D. Stiles, B. G. Park, and K. J. Lee, Spin currents and spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers,Nat. Mater.17, 509 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    J. Han, A. Richardella, S. A. Siddiqui, J. Finley, N. Samarth, and L. Liu, Room-temperature spin-orbit torque switching in- duced by a topological insulator, P h y s .R e v .L e t t .119, 077702 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    X. Wang, J. Tang, X. Xia, C. He, J. Zhang, Y . Liu, C. Wan, C. Fang, C. Guo, W. Yang, Y . Guang et al., Current-driven mag- netization switching in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw8904 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    1" and "0

    P. He, C.-H. Hsu, S. Shi, K. Cai, J. Wang, Q. Wang, G. Eda, H. Lin, V . M. Pereira, and H. Yang, Nonlinear magne- totransport shaped by Fermi surface topology and convexity, Nat. Commun. 10, 1290 (2019). 7 1 Supplemental Material for Facilitating field-free perpendicular magne...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.