Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 59 references

On Privacy, Security, and Trustworthiness in Distributed Wireless Large AI Models (WLAM)

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Survey maps privacy, security, and trust for wireless large AI models

desk verdict Useful survey map of privacy, security, and trust for distributed wireless large AI models, but the promised theoretical findings are unsupported heuristics and the paper should be repositioned as a survey. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02538 v2 pith:DG6ZMQLW submitted 2024-12-03 cs.IT cs.LGeess.SPmath.IT

Zhaohui Yang , Wei Xu , Le Liang , Yuanhao Cui , Zhijin Qin , Merouane Debbah This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITcs.LGeess.SPmath.IT
keywords wirelesslargeAImodelsdistributedprivacysecuritytrustworthinessfederatedlearningsplitsemanticcommunication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a survey that argues the safe deployment of large AI models over 6G wireless networks requires treating privacy, security, and trustworthiness as one design problem, not three add-ons. It organizes the field into two main architectures—data distribution via federated learning (training on devices and sharing only model updates) and model distribution via split learning (splitting the model itself across devices)—and classifies privacy protections by what crosses the wireless link: raw data, accurate model parameters, or deliberately inaccurate model parameters. On security it catalogs wireless-specific attacks, including progressive model injection, dynamic Byzantine behavior, and channel manipulation, and pairs each with defenses such as cross-layer aggregation, intelligent aggregators, game-theoretic defense, and blockchain. On trust it points to distributed semantic communication, blockchain-based ledgers, and ethical safeguards as the mechanisms that make a WLAM system accountable. The payoff of the organizing scheme is a research agenda: each combination of architecture, transmission type, and attack class points to a concrete open problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the privacy taxonomy based on what crosses the wireless link, anchored by the noise-additive transformation $g_i(\nabla f_i(x)) = \nabla f_i(x) + n_i$ for inaccurate model parameters. The claim is that as the number of users grows, noise power grows linearly while gradient amplitude power grows quadratically, so the aggregated global model remains accurate enough to converge; this one equation is what lets the paper argue that privacy can be bought without necessarily losing model performance. Supporting machinery includes the attack classes (data poisoning, model injection, dynamic Byzantine, channel manipulation) and the defense stack (cross-layer aggregation, intelligent aggregator, adversarial game, incentive mechanism, edge collaboration, channel encryption), plus the trust layer built from semantic communication (alignment, compression versus accuracy, ambiguity resolution, multimodal fusion) and blockchain-based distributed systems.

What would settle it

Run a federated WLAM simulation or small hardware test where gradients are corrupted exactly as in Eq. (1), with noise power growing linearly while the number of users grows, and measure global model accuracy on a real task such as image classification. If accuracy collapses well before the user count predicted by the quadratic-gradient/linear-noise argument, or if edge devices cannot load the model at all under realistic memory and battery limits, the paper's central claim of privacy without performance loss fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Distributed wireless large AI models (WLAM) can become privacy-preserving, secure, and trustworthy if defenders choose protection levels matched to what is transmitted and if trust is embedded in semantic communication and blockchain layers. The paper's central organizing claim is a three-level privacy taxonomy: encrypting raw data, transmitting accurate model parameters, or transmitting inaccurate parameters that are noise-added, quantized, encoded, or encrypted. It argues that inaccurate parameter transmission turns the mapping from raw data to transmitted message from one-to-one into one-to-many or many-to-one, making data reconstruction harder for attackers, and that noise addition with linearly growing noise power against quadratically growing gradient power lets federated learning converge when many users participate. It further claims that security in wireless settings requires wireless-aware defenses—cross-layer aggregation that checks channel quality alongside parameter values, dynamic trust evaluation for Byzantine nodes, channel-aware adversarial training, and Stackelberg-game-driven defense—and that trustworthiness rests on semantic alignment, blockchain immutability, and fairness and explainability checks, all applied to electromagnetic signal processing use cases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that edge devices in wireless networks have enough computation, memory, and energy to run large AI models locally, and that adding noise to model parameters as in Eq. (1) still lets federated learning converge; the paper asserts both but provides no capacity, energy, or convergence measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the three-level privacy taxonomy is correct, system designers can choose a privacy regime by deciding what kind of information leaves the device, rather than applying a single encryption layer uniformly.
  • If noise-additive aggregation with linearly growing noise power and quadratically growing gradient power converges as claimed, large-scale federated WLAM can offer privacy protection without a dedicated privacy budget or major accuracy loss.
  • If wireless-aware defenses such as cross-layer aggregation and channel-aware adversarial training are effective, future 6G AI designs should treat channel state information as a first-class security input.
  • If blockchain plus semantic communication delivers trustworthiness, distributed WLAM can offer auditability and semantic fidelity at the same time, with each node's behavior recorded immutably.
  • If EM signal processing techniques such as RF fingerprinting, signal obfuscation, and physical-layer security are integrated, applications like secure localization and tracking can protect user identity while retaining spatial awareness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The taxonomy implies a testable privacy-performance trade-off curve: measuring reconstruction success and convergence accuracy against noise power would verify or refute the paper's linear-versus-quadratic growth prediction before any deployment.
  • The paper's implicit bet is that edge devices can run large AI models locally; if battery and memory constraints dominate, the architecture may shift toward split learning and server-side processing, which the paper itself identifies as more vulnerable to intermediate-data attacks.
  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is model provenance: recording each device's update on a blockchain would turn the trust layer into an audit trail for both fairness and attribution, connecting the security and ethics sections.
  • A concrete next experiment would compare dynamic Byzantine detection using time-series trust evaluation against static Byzantine filters in a wireless simulator with time-varying channels, testing whether the proposed defense actually catches switching attackers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a high-level overview of privacy, security, and trustworthiness issues for distributed wireless large AI models (WLAM). It categorizes privacy protection into three levels (raw data, accurate model parameters, and inaccurate model parameters), discusses attacks and defenses (data poisoning, Byzantine attacks, channel manipulation, cross-layer aggregation, game-theoretic incentives, etc.), and covers trustworthiness in semantic communication and blockchain-based systems. It closes with applications to electromagnetic signal processing. The paper claims to provide classifications, theoretical findings, and proposed algorithms, but the technical content consists mostly of definitions and qualitative statements.

Significance. The topic is timely, and the paper could serve as a concise entry point to privacy, security, and trust issues in wireless AI, particularly for readers interested in semantic communication and EM signal processing. The organization is clear, and the paper cites recent work, including the authors' own contributions. If the claims of novel algorithms and theoretical findings were substantiated, the paper would be more significant. However, the paper provides no proofs, simulations, or data, and its main quantitative claim about noise-additive aggregation is a heuristic that is not valid under standard FedAvg averaging. The literature coverage is broad but shallow, so the current value is as a speculative roadmap rather than a comprehensive survey or a technical contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II-A.2.b, Eq. (1)] The convergence argument is unsupported and is inconsistent with standard federated averaging. The text claims that "the noise power increases linearly, whereas the gradient amplitude power grows quadratically" and concludes that with many users the global model is accurate and the federated learning process converges. Under FedAvg, the server averages client updates; if each client adds independent zero-mean noise of fixed variance, the aggregated noise variance decreases as σ²/N, while the signal (the mean gradient) does not grow quadratically in N. Even under sum aggregation, the quadratic growth of the gradient power requires the per-client gradients to be aligned, which is not guaranteed under non-IID data. No convergence bound (e.g., a DP-FedAvg-style analysis) or reference is given. Because the abstract and the Contributions section claim privacy "without compromising performance," this unsupported claim is load-bearing; the sentence should be replaced with a precise aggregation rule and a rigorous analysis, or explicitly downgraded to a heuristic.
  2. [Section I-C and Section II-A.2.b] The paper repeatedly states that it "proposes algorithms" and "proposes frameworks" (e.g., a personalized federated learning and privacy protection algorithm based on information fusion, cross-layer aggregation optimization, an intelligent aggregator, and incentive mechanisms), but none is described with enough detail to be reproducible; there is no pseudocode, no privacy parameters (ε, δ), no complexity analysis, and no experiments. The sentence in Section II-A.2.b that the proposed algorithm "maintains a level of accuracy comparable to that of unencrypted cases" is an empirical claim with no supporting data. The contributions should be reframed as a research agenda, or the methods need full specification and evaluation.
  3. [Section III-A, Eq. (3)] The abstract promises "theoretical findings about privacy and security," and the text says "We formalize this discrepancy" with Eq. (3). However, Eq. (3) only defines a discrepancy measure d between the outputs of two parameter sets; no theorem, bound, or algorithmic use of this measure is provided. This is a definition, not a theoretical finding. Either add substantive results about d (e.g., conditions under which it can be bounded or minimized) or replace the wording "theoretical findings" with "formal definitions and observations."
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] "a detailed privacy and security are analysis for distributed WLAM is fist revealed" should read "a detailed privacy and security analysis for distributed WLAM is first revealed."
  2. [Section I-A] "the model are is powerful" should read "the model is powerful and a large amount of data is obtained."
  3. [Section II-A.2.b, Eq. (1)] The variable x is described as "original data," but in ∇f_i(x) the gradient is conventionally taken with respect to model parameters, not data; using a separate symbol (e.g., w) for model parameters would avoid confusion.
  4. [Section III-A (around Fig. 3)] The rendered text contains raw "<latexit sha1=...>" markup and a long base64 string, which indicates a corrupted equation or figure; the figure and equation must be regenerated so that they are readable.
  5. [Section II-A.2.c, Eq. (2)] The relationship between the binary quantization in Eq. (2) and the cited work [18] is not explained; the reader cannot tell whether Eq. (2) summarizes [18] or is a separate proposed method.
  6. [Section II-B.3] The future research directions (e.g., intelligent adaptive security framework, enhanced federated adversarial training) are presented as one-sentence proposals; they should be labeled as open problems rather than as established contributions.
  7. [References] References [38] and [43] are arXiv preprints; please ensure that all bibliographic entries are complete and that preprint status is consistently indicated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an overview whose claims do not reduce to fitted parameters or self-cited theorems.

full rationale

This is a survey/position paper rather than a derivation chain, so the main circularity patterns do not apply. The central content is an organization of known privacy, security, and trustworthiness techniques (differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, split learning, blockchain, semantic communication) with references to prior literature. The only quantitative-looking claim is the statement after Eq. (1) that 'the noise power increases linearly, whereas the gradient amplitude power grows quadratically' and hence an accurate global model can be obtained. This is a substantive correctness/convergence concern, not a circularity: the claim is unsupported and depends on an implicit sum-aggregation and common-mean-gradient assumption, but it is not obtained by defining a parameter in terms of the conclusion, nor by fitting a quantity and then relabeling it as a prediction. The paper does cite the authors' own prior work (e.g., [4], [5], [11], [12], [13], [16]) for background definitions such as 'big AI models for 6G' and federated learning, but these citations supply context and are not used to prove the paper's organizing claims; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from self-citations to force a result. Under the requirement to flag circularity only when the paper's own equations or self-citations exhibit a reduction to inputs, no such reduction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced. The paper rests on several unproved engineering assumptions listed in the axioms.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Edge devices can easily support and execute learning-based large AI models.
    Stated directly in Section III-A; no capacity, energy, or latency measurements are provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Adding noise to model updates with linearly growing noise power relative to quadratically growing gradient power yields convergence when many users participate.
    Section II-A.b, Eq. (1). The paper asserts convergence without proof, simulation, or citation.
  • domain assumption Large AI models can resolve semantic ambiguity, misalignment, and multimodal fusion problems enough to make distributed semantic communication trustworthy.
    Section III-A subsections 1 to 4; claimed without benchmarks, relying on general capabilities of pre-trained models.
  • domain assumption Blockchain and cryptographic privacy tools can be integrated into wireless networks without unacceptable latency or energy cost.
    Section III-B acknowledges energy and latency issues but still concludes large AI models and blockchain can be combined; no quantitative analysis is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Privacy, Security, and Trustworthiness in Distributed Wireless Large AI Models (WLAM)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DG6ZMQLW

@misc{pith2026241202538,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Privacy, Security, and Trustworthiness in Distributed Wireless Large AI Models (WLAM)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DG6ZMQLW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02538}
}
read the original abstract

Combining wireless communication with large artificial intelligence (AI) models can open up a myriad of novel application scenarios. In sixth generation (6G) networks, ubiquitous communication and computing resources allow large AI models to serve democratic large AI models-related services to enable real-time applications like autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. However, the security considerations and sustainable communication resources limit the deployment of large AI models over distributed wireless networks. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of privacy, security, and trustworthy for distributed wireless large AI model (WLAM). In particular, a detailed privacy and security are analysis for distributed WLAM is fist revealed. The classifications and theoretical findings about privacy and security in distributed WLAM are discussed. Then the trustworthy and ethics for implementing distributed WLAM are described. Finally, the comprehensive applications of distributed WLAM are presented in the context of electromagnetic signal processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02538 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two potential classifications of distributed WLAM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The structure of this paper. For linear transformations, an example is adding artificial noise to model parameters: gi(∇fi(x)) = ∇fi(x) + ni (1) where x is the original data, ∇fi(x) is the gradient of the local model parameters to be transmitted, gi(∇fi(x)) is the transformed inaccurate gradient information, and ni is the artificially added noise. The noise power increases linearly, whereas the gradient amplitude po… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of model distributed semantic communication system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Application of EM signal processing in WLAM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,

    X. You, C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, X. Gao, Z. Zhang, M. Wang, Y . Huang, C. Zhang, Y . Jiang, J. Wanget al., “Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts,” Science China Information Sciences , vol. 64, pp. 1–74, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Artificial intelligence-powered decentralized framework for internet of things in healthcare 4.0,

    V . Puri, A. Kataria, and V . Sharma, “Artificial intelligence-powered decentralized framework for internet of things in healthcare 4.0,” Trans- actions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies , vol. 35, no. 4, p. e4245, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    AI empowered communication systems for intelligent transportation systems,

    Z. Lv, R. Lou, and A. K. Singh, “AI empowered communication systems for intelligent transportation systems,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 4579–4587, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Big AI models for 6G wireless networks: Opportunities, challenges, and research directions,

    Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Big AI models for 6G wireless networks: Opportunities, challenges, and research directions,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 164–172, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Guest editorial: Sustainable big AI model for wireless networks,

    Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, Y . C. Eldar, D. T. Hoang, W. Tong, and K.- K. Wong, “Guest editorial: Sustainable big AI model for wireless networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 18–19, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Implementation of big AI models for wireless networks with collaborative edge computing,

    L. Zeng, S. Ye, X. Chen, and Y . Yang, “Implementation of big AI models for wireless networks with collaborative edge computing,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 50–58, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,

    J. Lin, W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1125–1142, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis,

    K. Wei, J. Li, M. Ding, C. Ma, H. H. Yang, F. Farokhi, S. Jin, T. Q. S. Quek, and H. Vincent Poor, “Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 15, pp. 3454–3469, 2020

    2020

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Binarizing split learning for data privacy enhancement and computation reduction,

    N. D. Pham, A. Abuadbba, Y . Gao, K. T. Phan, and N. Chilamkurti, “Binarizing split learning for data privacy enhancement and computation reduction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 18, pp. 3088–3100, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Ethical framework for artificial intelligence and digital technologies,

    M. Ashok, R. Madan, A. Joha, and U. Sivarajah, “Ethical framework for artificial intelligence and digital technologies,” International Journal of Information Management , vol. 62, p. 102433, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    A joint learning and communications framework for federated learning over wireless networks,

    M. Chen, Z. Yang, W. Saad, C. Yin, H. V . Poor, and S. Cui, “A joint learning and communications framework for federated learning over wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 269–283, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Federated learning for 6G: Applications, challenges, and opportunities,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, K.-K. Wong, H. V . Poor, and S. Cui, “Federated learning for 6G: Applications, challenges, and opportunities,” Engineer- ing, vol. 8, pp. 33–41, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Joint communication and learn- ing design of differential privacy for federated learning over multi-cell networks,

    L. Lin, Z. Zhao, Z. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “Joint communication and learn- ing design of differential privacy for federated learning over multi-cell networks,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2023, pp. 770–775

    2023

  6. [14]

    SplitFed: When federated learning meets split learning,

    C. Thapa, P. C. Mahawaga Arachchige, S. Camtepe, and L. Sun, “SplitFed: When federated learning meets split learning,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 8485–8493, Jun. 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Unleashing the tiger: Inference attacks on split learning,

    D. Pasquini, G. Ateniese, and M. Bernaschi, “Unleashing the tiger: Inference attacks on split learning,” ser. CCS ’21. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, p. 2113–2129

    2021

  8. [16]

    Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, W. Saad, C. S. Hong, and M. Shikh-Bahaei, “Energy efficient federated learning over wireless communication networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1935–1949, 2021. 11 EnhanceBeamforming Spread Spectrum EM Signal Processin...

    1935

  9. [17]

    Privacy protection in intelligent vehicle networking: A novel federated learning algorithm based on information fusion,

    Z. Qu, Y . Tang, G. Muhammad, and P. Tiwari, “Privacy protection in intelligent vehicle networking: A novel federated learning algorithm based on information fusion,” Information Fusion , vol. 98, p. 101824, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Joint privacy en- hancement and quantization in federated learning,

    N. Lang, E. Sofer, T. Shaked, and N. Shlezinger, “Joint privacy en- hancement and quantization in federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 71, pp. 295–310, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Privacy-encoded federated learning against gradient-based data reconstruction attacks,

    H. Liu, B. Li, P. Xie, and C. Zhao, “Privacy-encoded federated learning against gradient-based data reconstruction attacks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Secure federated learning with fully homomorphic encryption for iot communications,

    N. M. Hijazi, M. Aloqaily, M. Guizani, B. Ouni, and F. Karray, “Secure federated learning with fully homomorphic encryption for iot communications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    The semantic communication game,

    B. Güler, A. Yener, and A. Swami, “The semantic communication game,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Network- ing, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 787–802, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    A joint communication and computation design for semantic wireless communication with probability graph,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Yang, X. Gan, Q.-V . Pham, C. Huang, W. Xu, and Z. Zhang, “A joint communication and computation design for semantic wireless communication with probability graph,”Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 361, no. 13, p. 107055, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Toward semantic communications: Deep learning-based image semantic coding,

    D. Huang, F. Gao, X. Tao, Q. Du, and J. Lu, “Toward semantic communications: Deep learning-based image semantic coding,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 55– 71, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Representation and fusion based on knowledge graph in multi-modal semantic communication,

    C. Xing, J. Lv, T. Luo, and Z. Zhang, “Representation and fusion based on knowledge graph in multi-modal semantic communication,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1344–1348, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Semantic communication system based on semantic slice models propagation,

    C. Dong, H. Liang, X. Xu, S. Han, B. Wang, and P. Zhang, “Semantic communication system based on semantic slice models propagation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 202–213, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Joint urllc traffic scheduling and resource allocation for semantic communication systems,

    G. Ding, S. Liu, J. Yuan, and G. Yu, “Joint urllc traffic scheduling and resource allocation for semantic communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7278– 7290, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    A joint communication and computation design for distributed RISs assisted probabilistic semantic communication in IIoT,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Yang, C. Huang, L. Wei, Q. Yang, C. Zhong, W. Xu, and Z. Zhang, “A joint communication and computation design for distributed RISs assisted probabilistic semantic communication in IIoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 26 568–26 579, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Deep learning enabled semantic communication systems,

    H. Xie, Z. Qin, G. Y . Li, and B.-H. Juang, “Deep learning enabled semantic communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 2663–2675, Apr. 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Wireless image re- trieval at the edge,

    M. Jankowski, D. Gündüz, and K. Mikolajczyk, “Wireless image re- trieval at the edge,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 89–100, Nov. 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Deep learning- enabled semantic communication systems with task-unaware transmitter and dynamic data,

    H. Zhang, S. Shao, M. Tao, X. Bi, and K. B. Letaief, “Deep learning- enabled semantic communication systems with task-unaware transmitter and dynamic data,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 170–185, Nov. 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Semantic communication meets edge intelligence,

    W. Yang, Z. Q. Liew, W. Y . B. Lim, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, X. Chi, X. Cao, and K. B. Letaief, “Semantic communication meets edge intelligence,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 28–35, Oct. 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Energy efficient semantic communication over wireless networks with rate splitting,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, Z. Zhang, and C. Huang, “Energy efficient semantic communication over wireless networks with rate splitting,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1484–1495, Jan. 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    A joint communication and computation design for probabilistic semantic com- munications,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Yang, M. Chen, Z. Zhang, and H. V . Poor, “A joint communication and computation design for probabilistic semantic com- munications,” Entropy, vol. 26, no. 5, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Learning task-oriented communication for edge inference: An information bottleneck approach,

    J. Shao, Y . Mao, and J. Zhang, “Learning task-oriented communication for edge inference: An information bottleneck approach,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 197–211, Jan. 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Edge learning for B5G networks with distributed signal processing: Semantic communication, edge computing, and wireless sensing,

    W. Xu, Z. Yang, D. W. K. Ng, M. Levorato, Y . C. Eldar, and M. Debbah, “Edge learning for B5G networks with distributed signal processing: Semantic communication, edge computing, and wireless sensing,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 9–39, Jan. 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    The information bottleneck method,

    N. Tishby, F. C. Pereira, and W. Bialek, “The information bottleneck method,” in Proc. Annu. Allerton Conf. Commun. Control Comput. , Monticello, IL, USA, Sep. 1999, pp. 368–377

    1999

  29. [37]

    Semantic importance-aware communications using pre-trained language models,

    S. Guo, Y . Wang, S. Li, and N. Saeed, “Semantic importance-aware communications using pre-trained language models,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2328–2332, Sep. 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Integrating pre-trained language model with physical layer communications,

    J.-H. Lee, D.-H. Lee, J. Lee, and J. Pujara, “Integrating pre-trained language model with physical layer communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11656, Feb. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    From semantic communication to semantic-aware networking: Model, architecture, and open problems,

    G. Shi, Y . Xiao, Y . Li, and X. Xie, “From semantic communication to semantic-aware networking: Model, architecture, and open problems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 44–50, Aug. 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Semantic communications: Overview, open issues, and future research directions,

    X. Luo, H.-H. Chen, and Q. Guo, “Semantic communications: Overview, open issues, and future research directions,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 210–219, Feb. 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Secure semantic communications: Fundamentals and challenges,

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, G. Li, Y . Yang, and Z. Zhang, “Secure semantic communications: Fundamentals and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 513–520, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    A unified multi- task semantic communication system for multimodal data,

    G. Zhang, Q. Hu, Z. Qin, Y . Cai, G. Yu, and X. Tao, “A unified multi- task semantic communication system for multimodal data,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 4101–4116, Jul. 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Multi-modal fusion- based multi-task semantic communication system,

    Z. Zhu, R. Zhang, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “Multi-modal fusion- based multi-task semantic communication system,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00964, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Multimodal and multiuser semantic communications for channel-level information fusion,

    X. Luo, R. Gao, H.-H. Chen, S. Chen, Q. Guo, and P. N. Suganthan, “Multimodal and multiuser semantic communications for channel-level information fusion,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 117– 125, Apr. 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Large ai model empowered multimodal semantic communications,

    F. Jiang, Y . Peng, L. Dong, K. Wang, K. Yang, C. Pan, and X. You, “Large ai model empowered multimodal semantic communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01249 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Blockchain and artificial intelligence for 5G-enabled Internet of Things: Challenges, opportunities, and solutions,

    A. Dhar Dwivedi, R. Singh, K. Kaushik, R. Rao Mukkamala, and W. S. Alnumay, “Blockchain and artificial intelligence for 5G-enabled Internet of Things: Challenges, opportunities, and solutions,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 35, no. 4, p. e4329, Apr. 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Blockchain and artificial intelligence for dynamic resource sharing in 6G and beyond,

    S. Hu, Y .-C. Liang, Z. Xiong, and D. Niyato, “Blockchain and artificial intelligence for dynamic resource sharing in 6G and beyond,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 145–151, Aug. 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    AI and blockchain enabled future wireless networks: A survey and outlook,

    Z. Zhou, O. Onireti, H. Xu, L. Zhang, and M. Imran, “AI and blockchain enabled future wireless networks: A survey and outlook,”Distrib. Ledger Technol. Res. Pract., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–30, Sep. 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    A survey of blockchain and artificial intelligence for 6G wireless communications,

    Y . Zuo, J. Guo, N. Gao, Y . Zhu, S. Jin, and X. Li, “A survey of blockchain and artificial intelligence for 6G wireless communications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2494–2528, Sep. 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic theory . John Wiley & Sons, 2007, vol. 33

    2007

  43. [51]

    C. R. Paul, R. C. Scully, and M. A. Steffka, Introduction to electromag- netic compatibility. John Wiley & Sons, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    J. G. Van Bladel, Electromagnetic fields. John Wiley & Sons, 2007, vol. 19

    2007

  45. [53]

    Reconfiguring wireless environments 12 via intelligent surfaces for 6G: Reflection, modulation, and security,

    J. Xu, C. Yuen, C. Huang, N. Ul Hassan, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Di Renzo, and M. Debbah, “Reconfiguring wireless environments 12 via intelligent surfaces for 6G: Reflection, modulation, and security,” Science China Information Sciences , vol. 66, no. 3, p. 130304, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Waveforming: An overview with beamforming,

    Q. Xu, C. Jiang, Y . Han, B. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Waveforming: An overview with beamforming,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 132–149, 2018

    2018

  47. [55]

    Information security aspects of spread spectrum systems,

    H. Imai, “Information security aspects of spread spectrum systems,” in Advances in Cryptology — ASIACRYPT’94 , J. Pieprzyk and R. Safavi- Naini, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995, pp. 193–208

    1995

  48. [56]

    Obfuscation revealed: Leveraging electromagnetic signals for obfuscated malware classification,

    D.-P. Pham, D. Marion, M. Mastio, and A. Heuser, “Obfuscation revealed: Leveraging electromagnetic signals for obfuscated malware classification,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference , ser. ACSAC ’21. New York, NY , USA: Association for ...

    2021

  49. [57]

    Multi-antenna signal masking and round-trip transmission for privacy-preserving wireless sensing,

    Y . Wang, L. Sun, and Q. Du, “Multi-antenna signal masking and round-trip transmission for privacy-preserving wireless sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , vol. 19, pp. 6305– 6320, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Deep learning with differential privacy,

    M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang, “Deep learning with differential privacy,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security , ser. CCS ’16. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computin...

    2016

  51. [59]

    Wireless security through RF fingerprint- ing,

    O. Ureten and N. Serinken, “Wireless security through RF fingerprint- ing,” Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.