Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Nonlocal effective action and particle creation in $D$ dimensions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pair creation in curved spacetime collapses to a curvature-squared formula, with a clean exception for conformal fields in conformally flat geometries.

desk verdict The paper's central formula is likely right, but the derivation of Eq. (18) from Eq. (17) is wrong for D=4, and the text needs a fix before the main result can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03340 v2 pith:DTUKJC6L submitted 2024-12-04 hep-th gr-qc

Andrés Boasso , Sebastián Franchino-Viñas , Francisco D. Mazzitelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T2083C47 PACS 04.62.+v
keywords particlecreationnonlocaleffectiveactionWeyltensorCottonconformalcouplingvacuumpersistenceprobabilitypair-productionthresholdquantumfieldsincurvedspacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper computes the probability that a curved spacetime pulls particle pairs out of the vacuum, working to second order in the curvature for a real scalar field in $D$ dimensions. For massless fields in $D \geq 4$ it derives a closed formula for the pair-creation probability as an integral over Fourier modes with timelike momentum of a combination of the Ricci scalar and the Weyl tensor. The immediate consequence is that, at this order, conformally coupled fields in conformally flat spacetimes create no particles. The same conclusion is reached in $D = 3$ by rewriting the formula in terms of the Cotton tensor. The paper also stresses the threshold $p^2 < 0$, which implies that static weak gravitational backgrounds cannot create pairs, and applies the $D=4$ formula to an oscillating Newtonian star.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the nonlocal, one-loop effective action of covariant perturbation theory, Eq. (3), whose form factors $\beta_{(i)}(\Box_E)$ carry the nonlocal and imaginary contributions. The calculation Wick-rotates the Euclidean action to Lorentzian signature, replaces $m^2$ with $m^2 - i\epsilon$, and extracts the imaginary part in Fourier space using $\Theta(-m^2 - \gamma p^2)$, which produces the pair-production threshold. Two geometric identities do the heavy lifting: the weak-field Gauss-Bonnet identity Eq. (19), which trades Ricci-squared terms for the Weyl tensor, and the Cotton-tensor identity Eq. (38), which replaces the Weyl term in $D=3$. The $D=4$ electric/magnetic decomposition of the Weyl tensor converts the result into a form directly analogous to the Schwinger pair-creation formula.

What would settle it

A direct Bogoliubov computation for a massless, conformally coupled scalar in a conformally flat but time-dependent metric, such as an FRW spacetime, expanded to second order in the scale-factor variation would settle it: if the $\beta$ coefficient or the produced number density is nonzero at that order, Eq. (22) is wrong. Alternatively, a numerical evaluation of the in-out effective action for a static weak gravitational field that yields a nonzero imaginary part would contradict the threshold argument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Eq. (22): for a massless scalar field in $D \geq 4$, the total pair-production probability is $P = [\pi^{(3-D)/2}/(4^D \Gamma((D+3)/2))] \int d^Dp/(2\pi)^D \, \Theta(-p^2)(-p^2)^{D/2-2} \big[ (D^2-1)(\xi-\xi_D)^2 R(-p)R(p) + \frac{D-2}{8(D-3)} C^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}(-p) C_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}(p) \big]$. Up to second order in the curvature, the only channels are the nonminimal-coupling term proportional to $R^2$ and the Weyl-squared term. Since the Weyl tensor vanishes on conformally flat metrics and the $R^2$ coefficient vanishes at the conformal coupling $\xi = \xi_D$, no particle creation occurs for conformal fields on conformally flat spacetimes. The paper further rewrites the theory in terms of the Cotton tensor, giving Eq. (41) valid for $D \geq 3$, and for $D=4$ recasts the Weyl-squared term as $8(E^2 - B^2)$, making the creation rate the gravitational analogue of the electromagnetic pair-creation invariant.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the nonlocal derivative expansion and the Wick-rotation shortcut: curvature varies fast enough that $\Box R$ dominates $R^2$, and the background switches off asymptotically so that in/out vacua are well defined; if either condition fails, the imaginary part and the no-creation conclusion need not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Conformally coupled massless scalars in conformally flat spacetimes have zero vacuum decay at quadratic order in curvature, so gravitational particle creation in such backgrounds must be sought at higher order or through the conformal anomaly.
  • For $D=4$, the Weyl contribution to the creation rate factors into $|E|^2 - |B|^2$, making the electric part the source and the magnetic part the suppressor, exactly as in electromagnetic pair creation.
  • Static weak gravitational fields cannot produce particles because their Fourier support misses the timelike threshold $p^2 < 0$; only backgrounds with genuine time dependence or an instability do.
  • In $D=3$, the Cotton tensor replaces the Weyl tensor, so conformally flat metrics again produce nothing at second order, and the vanishing of the Cotton tensor marks the no-creation locus.
  • The oscillating Newtonian star example gives a creation rate proportional to $(\xi - 1/6)^2 + 1/612$ times $(\epsilon GM \alpha_f)^2 a_0^4 \omega^7$, which is minimized at conformal coupling and depends on the star's internal structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the no-creation result survives beyond second order, it suggests that conformally flat cosmological models with conformally coupled matter have a parametrically suppressed gravitational pair-creation channel, sharpening early-universe particle-production estimates.
  • The Cotton-tensor version offers a practical diagnostic in three-dimensional gravitational models: a nonzero pair-creation rate at quadratic order is equivalent to a nonzero Cotton tensor, i.e., to non-conformal flatness.
  • The threshold argument implies a testable selection rule: for any horizonless, static, weak gravitational background, the vacuum persistence probability should remain unity at second order, a claim that a numerical evaluation of the in-out effective action could confirm or refute.
  • A natural extension the authors leave implicit is to quartic order, where the conformal anomaly enters; following the Riegert action in $D=4$, anomaly-induced creation could appear even in conformally flat spacetimes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the imaginary part of the one-loop effective action for a scalar field coupled to curvature in D spacetime dimensions, using the Barvinsky–Vilkovisky nonlocal effective action expanded to second order in the curvature. The main results are: a D-dimensional formula for the pair-production probability in terms of the Ricci scalar and Weyl tensor (Eq. (22)); the conclusion that, at quadratic order in curvature, massless conformally coupled fields in conformally flat metrics produce no particles; an electric/magnetic decomposition of the Weyl-squared term in D=4; a Cotton-tensor reformulation valid for D≥3; and a threshold analysis arguing that static weak gravitational backgrounds do not create particles. The paper also applies the D=4 formula to an oscillating Newtonian star and includes an appendix proving the needed geometric identities.

Significance. If the central result is correct, this is a useful D-dimensional generalization of known four-dimensional results and clarifies the threshold structure of gravitational particle creation. The geometric identities (19), (38), and (42) are proved in Appendix A, and the D=4 limit correctly reduces to the electric/magnetic form (27), which matches prior literature. The paper also gives a concrete and reproducible star example. However, the derivation of the central formula contains an algebraic inconsistency that must be fixed before the manuscript can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eqs. (16)-(18)] The derivation of Eq. (18) from Eq. (17) is internally inconsistent for D=4. Evaluating Eq. (17) with the stated f(2)=γ=1-z^2/4 gives α(4)=1/30 and α(3)=ξ^2-(11/6)ξ+1/60, hence α(3)/α(4)=30ξ^2-55ξ+1/2. Equation (18) instead requires the R^2 coefficient to be 30ξ^2-10ξ+1/2 relative to R_{μν}R^{μν}. The linear terms disagree, and at ξ=ξ_4=1/6 the ratio from Eq. (17) is -47/6 rather than the -1/3 that is needed for the combination R_{μν}R^{μν}-(1/3)R^2 to vanish on conformally flat metrics. This suggests a typo in the definition of γ in Eq. (6) or of f(2) in Eq. (7): replacing γ=1-z^2/4 by (1-z^2)/4 makes the integrals match. As written, Eq. (18)--and therefore Eq. (22)--does not follow from the stated α(i), and the manuscript must correct the relevant definition and re-derive the formulas.
  2. [Sec. III.C and the Wick-rotation shortcut in Sec. III] The replacement □_E→□, m^2→m^2-iϵ used to obtain the imaginary part of the Lorentzian effective action assumes that the in and out vacua are well defined and that the background is asymptotically switched off, as the paper itself notes in Sec. V. The oscillating-star example has a periodic, eternally oscillating background that is never switched off, and the rate in Eq. (36) is obtained by formally dividing by τ=2πδ(0). The central formula (22) is not affected, but the star rate should be presented as a formal/heuristic result under this shortcut, with the assumptions made explicit in Sec. III.C.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (17) and Eq. (7)] The notation in Eq. (17) is easy to misread because α(3) mixes terms of different powers in ξ; please add an explicit intermediate D=4 evaluation so that the cancellation at ξ=1/6 is apparent.
  2. [Sec. III.C, around Eq. (29)] The text says 'f(1)=1, while f'(1)=f''(1)=0, where the tilde denotes derivative', but no tilde is used; this should read 'prime denotes derivative with respect to the argument'.
  3. [Appendix A] There is a typo in 'Cottton tensor' in the paragraph after Eq. (A6); it should be 'Cotton tensor'.
  4. [Footnote 1] The footnote contains a typo: 'trasnform' should be 'transform'.
  5. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (18)] The conversion from the prefactor in Eq. (16), which uses d^Dp/(4π)^D, to Eq. (18), which uses d^Dp/(2π)^D, is not shown; please make the change of prefactor explicit to help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (22) follows from the stated BV form factors and geometric identities; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (22), is derived inside the paper from the Barvinsky-Vilkovisky second-order nonlocal effective action quoted in Eq. (3), with the explicit form factors (4)-(7), the threshold integrals (15)-(17), and the geometric Gauss-Bonnet/Weyl identities (19)-(21). These are stated inputs, not re-statements of the output. The Cotton-tensor expressions (40)-(41) are obtained from the paper's own identity (38) and the Weyl-Cotton relation (42), both proved in Appendix A; this is a rearrangement of the same content, not an independent input smuggled in. The D=4 limit is benchmarked against external works [10-12], and the no-creation statement for conformal fields in conformally flat spacetimes follows algebraically because the quadratic combination in Eq. (18) is proportional to the Weyl-square invariant plus a (xi-xi_D)^2 term; it is not imposed by construction. The self-citations ([4], [5], [19], [32]) are contextual or ancillary: [19] supports a static-polarization statement that is already implied by the threshold, and [32] is a future-direction remark. No parameter is fitted to the quantity claimed as predicted, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. One possible arithmetic inconsistency in the printed Eq. (7) (f(2)=gamma versus the form needed to obtain Eq. (18)) is a correctness concern, not a circularity; if present, it would affect the derivation chain but would not make the result equivalent to its inputs. Therefore no circular step is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. It relies on the standard BV effective action, the Wick-rotation shortcut, and geometric identities proved in the appendix. The only tunable model parameters are xi and the star profile constant alpha_f, neither of which is fitted to data; the central claim holds for general xi and is evaluated at the conformal point.

free parameters (2)
  • nonminimal coupling xi
    Free parameter of the scalar field action (Eq. 1). The main result is evaluated at the conformal value xi_D = (D-2)/(4(D-1)), where the R^2 term vanishes.
  • star profile constant alpha_f = 1/7 for the chosen polynomial
    Encodes the internal structure of the star in the example (Eq. 35); the result (36) is proportional to alpha_f^2. It is a model input, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Barvinsky-Vilkovisky covariant perturbation theory to second order in curvatures, Eq. (3)
    The starting point, quoted from [8,9], assumes the derivative expansion box R >> R^2 and m^2 R and the validity of the nonlocal form factors (4)-(7).
  • domain assumption In-out effective action obtained by Wick rotation of Euclidean action with box_E -> box, m^2 -> m^2 - i epsilon
    Section III, page 4: used to compute the imaginary part; valid only when in and out vacua are well-defined and the background is asymptotically switched off, as acknowledged in Sec. V.
  • standard math Linearized Gauss-Bonnet identity (19) valid to second order in curvatures in any D
    Proved in App. A (A5) from the linearized Riemann expansions; used to rewrite R_mu nu^2 in terms of Weyl^2.
  • standard math Cotton tensor Gauss-Bonnet-like identity (38) and Weyl-Cotton relation (42)
    Derived in App. A using the linearized contracted Bianchi identity; used for the D >= 3 reformulation (41).
  • domain assumption Identification of 2 Im(Gamma) with the pair production probability P
    Eq. (9): P = 2 Im(Gamma) for weak fields; assumes unitarity and well-defined in/out vacua.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlocal effective action and particle creation in $D$ dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DTUKJC6L

@misc{pith2026241203340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlocal effective action and particle creation in $D$ dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DTUKJC6L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03340}
}
abstract

We compute the particle creation rate in the context of quantum fields in curved spacetimes, by evaluating the imaginary part of the effective action up to second order in the curvatures. For arbitrary metrics in dimensions $D\geq4$, we express the vacuum persistence amplitude in terms of the Ricci scalar and the Weyl tensor, showing that, up to their second power, no particle creation occurs for conformal fields in conformally flat spacetimes. We pinpoint an analogy with the electromagnetic pair creation, by writing the squared Weyl tensor invariant in terms of its electric and magnetic parts. In addition, we present an alternative expression for the imaginary part of the effective action employing the Cotton tensor. This is particularly useful in $D=3$, where the Weyl tensor trivially vanishes and the Cotton tensor is related to conformal flatness. Finally, we highlight the importance of the threshold for particle creation, a point that has been overlooked in some recent studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conformally-flat gravitational analogues to the Schwinger effect

    hep-th 2026-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Resummed heat kernels yield exact scalar pair-creation probabilities in conformally flat spacetimes, including new curvature-induced Schwinger analogues, with the radiation-dominated rate verified independently in arb...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization,

    J. Schwinger,“On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization,” Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  2. [2]

    Quantum Fields in Curved Space,

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, “Quantum Fields in Curved Space,” Cambridge University Press, 1982, ISBN 978-0-521- 27858-4, 978-0-521-27858-4 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511622632; S. A. Fulling, “Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time,” London Math. Soc. Student Texts 17 (1989), 1-315; L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Cambridge University Press, 2009, ...

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1989

  3. [3]

    Particle creation in expanding universes,

    L. Parker, “Particle creation in expanding universes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.21 (1968), 562-564 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.562

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.21.562 1968

  4. [4]

    Weak and strong quantum vacua in Bianchi type I universes,

    M. Castagnino and F. D. Mazzitelli, “Weak and strong quantum vacua in Bianchi type I universes,” Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985), 742-753 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.742

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.742 1985

  5. [5]

    Cauchy Data and Hadamard Singularities in Time Dependent Back- grounds,

    F. D. Mazzitelli, J. P. Paz and M. A. Castagnino, “Cauchy Data and Hadamard Singularities in Time Dependent Back- grounds,” Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987), 2994-3001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2994

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.2994 1987

  6. [6]

    Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual

    D.V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual” Physics Reports Volume 388, Issues 5–6, 2003, 279

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    The gospel according to DeWitt

    G. Vilkovisky, “The gospel according to DeWitt”, in Quantum theory of gravity. Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of Bryce S. DeWitt , Christensen, S.M. (ed.) Adam Hilger Limited, Bristol (UK)1984

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, Nucl. Phys. B 333 (1990), 471-511 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90047-H

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90047-h 1990

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    The Covariant Technique for Calculation of One Loop Effective Action,

    I. G. Avramidi, “The Covariant Technique for Calculation of One Loop Effective Action,” Nucl. Phys. B 355 (1991), 712-754 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 509 (1998), 557-558] doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90492-G

    1991 doi

  2. [10]

    Particle Creation in Inhomogeneous Space-times,

    J. A. Frieman, “Particle Creation in Inhomogeneous Space-times,” Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989), 389 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.389

    1989 doi

  3. [11]

    Particle production from nonlocal gravitational effective action,

    A. Dobado and A. L. Maroto, “Particle production from nonlocal gravitational effective action,” Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999), 104045 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104045 [arXiv:gr-qc/9803076 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Semiclassical equations for weakly inhomogeneous cosmologies,

    A. Campos and E. Verdaguer, “Semiclassical equations for weakly inhomogeneous cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D 49, 1861- 1880 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1861 [arXiv:gr-qc/9307027 [gr-qc]]

    1994 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation,

    M. F. Wondrak, W. D. van Suijlekom and H. Falcke, “Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) no.22, 221502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.221502 [arXiv:2305.18521 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Conformal anomaly and gravitational pair production,

    M. N. Chernodub, “Conformal anomaly and gravitational pair production,” [arXiv:2306.03892 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Complex effective actions and gravitational pair creation,

    E. T. Akhmedov, D. V. Diakonov and C. Schubert, “Complex effective actions and gravitational pair creation,” [arXiv:2407.06601 [hep-th]]

  8. [16]

    Sur De Nouvelles Solutions Oscillatoires Des Equations De La Gravitation

    A. Matte, “Sur De Nouvelles Solutions Oscillatoires Des Equations De La Gravitation”, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, Volume 5 , 1953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1953-001-3

    1953 doi

  9. [17]

    Quantum Field Theory,

    C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, “Quantum Field Theory,” McGraw-Hill, 1980, ISBN 978-0-486-44568-7 13

    1980

  10. [18]

    Gravitational collapse of Newtonian stars,

    Jun, Jung-Hwan and Ho, Young Kwak, “Gravitational collapse of Newtonian stars,” International Journal of Modern Physics D 09 (2000) no.35-42 doi:10.1142/S0218271800000049 [arxiv.org/abs/1811.01616v1 [math.AP]]

    2000 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Vacuum polarization around stars: Nonlocal approximation,

    A. Satz, F. D. Mazzitelli and E. Alvarez, “Vacuum polarization around stars: Nonlocal approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005), 064001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.064001 [arXiv:gr-qc/0411046 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Quantum Gravitational Corrections to a Star Metric and the Black Hole Limit,

    X. Calmet, R. Casadio and F. Kuipers, “Quantum Gravitational Corrections to a Star Metric and the Black Hole Limit,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.8, 086010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.086010 [arXiv:1909.13277 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Quantum hair during gravitational collapse,

    X. Calmet, R. Casadio, S. D. H. Hsu and F. Kuipers, “Quantum hair during gravitational collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.8, 086012 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086012 [arXiv:2305.09466 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Comment on

    A. Ferreiro, J. Navarro-Salas and S. Pla, “Comment on ”Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation”,” [arXiv:2306.07628 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Reply to

    M. F. Wondrak, W. D. van Suijlekom and H. Falcke, “Reply to ”Comment on ’Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation”’,” [arXiv:2308.12326 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Inconsistency with De Sitter Spacetime of

    M. P. Hertzberg and A. Loeb, “Inconsistency with De Sitter Spacetime of ”Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation”,” [arXiv:2307.05243 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    On (dis)agreement between different methods of calculation of the imaginary part of the effective action in expanding space-times,

    E. T. Akhmedov, I. A. Belkovich, D. V. Diakonov and K. A. Kazarnovskii, “On (dis)agreement between different methods of calculation of the imaginary part of the effective action in expanding space-times,” [arXiv:2411.02170 [hep-th]]

  18. [26]

    Particle production rate for a dynamical system using the path integral approach,

    S. Ganguly, N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya and G. Manna, “Particle production rate for a dynamical system using the path integral approach,” [arXiv:2410.12436 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Instability of global de Sitter space to particle creation,

    P. R. Anderson and E. Mottola, “Instability of global de Sitter space to particle creation,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), 104038 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.104038 [arXiv:1310.0030 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum theory in external electromagnetic and gravitational fields: A comparison of some conceptual issues

    T. Padmanabhan, “Quantum theory in external electromagnetic and gravitational fields: A comparison of some conceptual issues”, Pramana - J Phys 37, 179–233 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02847477

    1991 doi

  21. [29]

    Trace Anomalies and the Hawking Effect,

    S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling, “Trace Anomalies and the Hawking Effect,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977), 2088-2104 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2088

    1977 doi

  22. [30]

    Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,

    For a review see M. Maggiore, “Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review,” Fundam. Theor. Phys.187, 221-281 (2017) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1 16 [arXiv:1606.08784 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A Nonlocal Action for the Trace Anomaly,

    R. J. Riegert, “A Nonlocal Action for the Trace Anomaly,” Phys. Lett. B 134 (1984), 56-60 doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(84)90983-3; I. L. Shapiro and A. G. Zheksenaev, “Gauge dependence in higher derivative quantum gravity and the conformal anomaly problem,” Phys. Lett. B 324 (1994),...

    1984 doi

  24. [32]

    Universal Definition of the Nonconformal Trace Anomaly,

    R. Ferrero, S. A. Franchino-Vi˜ nas, M. B. Fr¨ ob and W. C. C. Lima, “Universal Definition of the Nonconformal Trace Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) no.7, 071601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.071601 [arXiv:2312.07666 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, “Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,” Z. Phys. 98 (1936) no.11-12, 714-732 doi:10.1007/BF01343663 [arXiv:physics/0605038 [physics]]

    1936 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.