Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

A Lower-Dimensional Remnant of Flux Attachment

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives a 1+1-dimensional remnant of 2+1-dimensional Chern-Simons flux attachment: a reduced chiral-axion action coupled to matter yields a flux attachment law on the line and transmutes the matter's statistics via a…

desk verdict The chiral kinetic term that anchors this dimensional reduction is effectively assumed, not derived; a useful survey and a candidate model, but the central claim needs more work. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03346 v1 pith:IPPERLNN submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el

Gerard Valentí-Rojas , Patrik Öhberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el
keywords fluxattachmentChern-SimonstheorydimensionalreductionstatisticaltransmutationJordan-Wignerstringanyonsin1Dchiralbosontopologicalgauge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper attempts to show that the flux attachment mechanism of 2+1-dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theory does not disappear under dimensional reduction but leaves a working remnant in one spatial dimension. The authors derive a reduced topological action, the chiral-axion theory, via two reduction protocols, and show that coupling it to matter produces a local flux attachment law $a_x = \pm 4\pi\kappa J^0$. They then demonstrate that this density-dependent gauge potential changes the exchange statistics of the matter field through a Jordan-Wigner string, so the charges become anyonic on a line. A sympathetic reader would care because this connects the well-established anyon phenomenology of fractional quantum Hall fluids to one-dimensional systems, where no magnetic flux exists but statistical transmutation can still be defined.

What carries the argument

The central object is the chiral-axion action (54), a $1+1$D topological action combining a chiral boson term $\pm \frac{\kappa}{4\pi}\, \partial_t \varphi\, \partial_x \varphi$ with an axion (background-field or $\theta$-term-like) coupling $-\frac{1}{4\pi} \varphi\, \varepsilon^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu a_\nu$. The chiral boson term forces the scalar field $\varphi$, which plays the role of a spacetime-varying $\theta$-angle and encodes the transverse component of the original gauge field, to move only in one direction. The flux attachment law (63) is obtained as a classical equation of motion of this action minimally coupled to matter, and the Jordan-Wigner string (66)--(67) is the singular gauge transformation that turns the density-dependent gauge potential into an anyonic exchange phase. The whole construction is carried by the $U(1)$ Kac-Moody algebra (59)--(60), whose anomalous character dictates how the coupled theory must be quantized.

What would settle it

Performing the compactification step by step without assuming the extra conditions on the gauge parameter would settle the point: if the resulting action contains only the topological $\theta$-term $\tilde{\varphi}\,\varepsilon^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu \tilde{a}_\nu$ and no term proportional to $\partial_t \tilde{\varphi}\,\partial_x \tilde{\varphi}$, the central claim fails. A second route is to read off the gauge transformations of $\varphi$ and $a_\mu$ from the reduced action and check whether they force $\partial_x \tilde{\xi} = 0$ and $\partial_t \tilde{\xi} = 2\kappa\, \partial_t \tilde{\varphi}$; if they do not, the two reduction protocols disagree and the chiral term has been put in by hand.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a pure Abelian Chern-Simons theory, dimensionally reduced to $1+1$D and coupled to matter, yields the chiral-axion action $S = \frac{1}{4\pi} \int dt\, dx \left[\pm \kappa\, \partial_t \varphi\, \partial_x \varphi - \varphi\, \varepsilon^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu a_\nu\right]$, and that the equations of motion of this reduced coupled theory enforce the local constraint $a_x(t,x) = \pm 4\pi\kappa J^0(t,x) + \xi(x)$. This is the $1+1$D analogue of the $2+1$D flux attachment law $\nabla \times a = 2\pi\alpha n$, with the gauge potential proportional to the Noether charge density. Removing the statistical gauge field by a Jordan-Wigner-type singular gauge transformation changes the equal-time commutation relations of the matter field to anyonic ones, as encoded in Eqs. (77)--(79). The paper further claims that the chiral kinetic term in the reduced action emerges naturally from the reduction itself, rather than being inserted by hand, provided the two reduction protocols are made consistent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two methods used to reduce the spatial dimension agree with each other under a pair of conditions on an auxiliary gauge parameter, namely that its change in space is zero and its change in time is proportional to the time change of the axion field; if those conditions are not genuinely forced by the reduction, the compactified version collapses to a single topological term and the kinetic term that makes the field directional — and thereby produces the flux attachment law — does not appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A $1+1$D system described by the chiral-axion action (54) coupled to matter carries a local flux attachment law $a_x = \pm 4\pi\kappa J^0$, making the statistical gauge field a linear functional of the particle density.
  • After a Jordan-Wigner-type singular gauge transformation, the matter field obeys the anyonic exchange relations (77)--(79), so statistical transmutation occurs on a line in exactly the way it does in the fractional quantum Hall effect in one dimension higher.
  • The reduced theory is intrinsically anomalous, with a $U(1)$ Kac-Moody algebra; a consistent quantum description therefore requires either integrating out the chiral axion as an auxiliary field or coupling it to chiral matter in a doubled ($2\chi$-axion) structure.
  • The remnant is not literal flux attachment — one-dimensional space has no magnetic flux — but a gauge dressing of the matter fields, so the dimensional reduction reinterprets 1D anyonic physics as the low-dimensional shadow of Chern-Simons theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to engineer the density-dependent gauge potential $a_x \propto J^0$ in a cold-atom or photonic lattice; the predicted anyonic exchange phases (77)--(79) would show up as characteristic statistical phases in interference experiments or density correlations.
  • The consistency conditions on the gauge parameter $\tilde{\xi}$ suggest that the compactification protocol is not unique: different compactifications (e.g., with twisted boundary conditions) might yield different $1+1$D theories, so the 'dimensional reduction' of a topological field theory is genuinely one-to-many, as the paper itself warns.
  • The chiral-axion action may be viewed as the continuum limit of a lattice model with a density-dependent Peierls phase; checking whether the anomalous Kac-Moody algebra survives on the lattice would connect this reduction to the Bose-Fermi dualities of the Tonks-Girardeau gas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript asks whether a remnant of Chern-Simons flux attachment survives dimensional reduction from 2+1D to 1+1D. It reduces an Abelian U(1) Chern-Simons action by two protocols: a boundary/edge reduction and a compactified/Kaluza-Klein reduction. The authors claim that the compactified reduction, supplemented by consistency conditions, yields the chiral-axion action (54), and that coupling to matter produces the 1+1D flux-attachment law (63), a_x = ±4πκ J^0 + ξ(x). They then show that a density-dependent gauge field of this form induces statistical transmutation via a Jordan-Wigner string, Eqs. (77)-(79). The statistical-transmutation section is coherent, but the derivation of the reduced action from the bulk Chern-Simons theory is the central weak point.

Significance. If the central claim held, the paper would provide a controlled field-theoretic route from 2+1D Chern-Simons theory to the Rabello-Kundu and composite-particle-duality constructions of 1D anyons, which is a genuinely interesting conceptual result. The paper is clearly written, and the second-quantized transmutation algebra in Sec. 2.2.1 is explicit and verifiable. However, the compactified reduction does not, as written, produce the chiral kinetic term without additional unproven assumptions, and the flux-attachment law contains a coefficient issue. The significance of the paper therefore depends on whether these gaps can be repaired or whether the paper is reframed as an analysis of a model obtained from the boundary construction.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1.2, Eqs. (50)-(54)] The compactified reduction yields only the θ-term (50) and the gauge-variation term (53). The claim that this becomes consistent with the boundary result (23) uses the conditions ∂x ξ̃ = 0 and ∂t ξ̃ = 2κ ∂t φ̃ stated after Eq. (53), but these conditions are not derived. They force 0 = ∂x∂t ξ̃ = 2κ ∂t∂x φ̃, so the equivalence holds only on configurations satisfying ∂t∂xφ̃ = 0, a restricted on-shell class, not as an off-shell identification of actions. The coefficient matching also requires κ = 1/2, which is not stated. Thus Eq. (54) is not obtained as a general dimensional reduction of the bulk Chern-Simons action.
  2. [Sec. 2.1.2, Eqs. (50) and (54)] Even if the chiral kinetic term were matched, the axion/BF term has a different coefficient: Eq. (50) gives (κ/2π) ∫ φ ε^{μν}∂_μ a_ν, whereas Eq. (54) has -(1/4π) ∫ φ ε^{μν}∂_μ a_ν. The stated consistency conditions do not rescale φ or a, so the topological term is also not reproduced by the compactified reduction. The two reductions therefore disagree in both terms of Eq. (54).
  3. [Sec. 2.1.1, Eq. (33)] The boundary protocol obtains the chiral term only by coupling the bulk Chern-Simons theory to additional boundary degrees of freedom to cancel the gauge anomaly. This is a bulk-boundary construction rather than a dimensional reduction of a closed bulk theory. The manuscript does not show that the boundary chiral boson is the unique or necessary completion of the reduction, so the claim that the chiral term appears without introducing dynamics by hand is not warranted by this route.
  4. [Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (61)-(63)] There is a factor-of-2 inconsistency in the derivation of the flux-attachment law. Varying the chiral term in Eq. (54) gives ε^{μν}∂_μ a_ν = ∓2κ ∂_t∂_x φ (assuming ∂_x∂_tφ = ∂_t∂_xφ), and Eq. (61) gives J^0 = -(1/4π) ∂_x φ in the temporal gauge. Integrating ∂_t a_x then yields a_x = ±8πκ J^0 + ξ(x), not the ±4πκ J^0 of Eq. (63), unless a different convention for ε^{01} or a different equation of motion is intended. This coefficient is central to the claimed remnant and should be clarified or corrected.
  5. [Sec. 2.2 and Appendix B, Eq. (89)] The functional form of the 1D flux-attachment law (63), a_x ∝ J^0, is not an independent output of the calculation: it is the same statistical gauge potential that the authors' composite-particle duality postulates in Eq. (89), and it also matches the Rabello-Kundu construction. Because the chiral-axion action (54) was designed to reproduce this relation, the argument is partly circular. The missing piece is a derivation of Eq. (54) from the bulk theory alone; the consistency conditions discussed above do not provide it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Ref. [38] is the same paper as Ref. [12] and should be cited once.
  2. [Eq. (26)] The notation 'Hedge = 0' is used without definition; it appears to mean that the edge Hamiltonian vanishes, but the notation should be introduced.
  3. [Eq. (59)] The identity ∂_x sgn(x) = 2δ(x) is used; it should be stated as a distributional identity.
  4. [Sec. 2.1.2, after Eq. (53)] The conditions ∂x ξ̃ = 0 and ∂t ξ̃ = 2κ ∂t φ̃ are load-bearing for the claimed consistency and should be proved or stated as explicit assumptions, not presented parenthetically.
  5. [Eq. (41)] The gauge-transformation argument for compactness of Φ is terse; the statement that compactness is needed 'in order to preserve gauge invariance' could be clarified because the Wilson loop is gauge invariant even before the compactness condition is imposed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The compactified reduction forces the chiral term by imposed consistency conditions, making the central 'natural reduction' claim partially circular; the boundary protocol provides independent but non-pure-CS support.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 2.1.2, Compactified Theory Reduction, after Eq. (53)]
    "Despite disagreeing with the boundary-theory reduction (23), the current Kaluza-Klein-reduced theory can be made consistent with the previous results if ∂x ξ̃ = 0 and ∂t ξ̃ = 2κ∂t φ̃. ... Here we have consistently obtained such a theory as the natural reduction of the parent theory, i.e. without the need of introducing dynamics by hand."

    The Kaluza-Klein reduction by itself yields only the θ-term (50) and the twist term (53); it does not produce the chiral kinetic term ±κ∂tφ∂xφ of Eq. (54). The text imposes ∂xξ̃=0 and ∂tξ̃=2κ∂tφ̃ so that Eq. (53) matches the previously assumed boundary action (23). These conditions are not derived from the parent Chern-Simons theory; they are chosen to reproduce the target action. Combining them gives ∂x∂tξ̃=2κ∂t∂xφ̃=0, so the matching holds only for configurations solving the free chiral equation, not as an off-shell action identity. Thus, along the compactification route, the chiral term is an input used to define 'consistency,' and the flux-attachment law (63), obtained from Eq. (54), inherits that input. The boundary protocol (Sec.

full rationale

The paper has two reduction protocols. The boundary protocol (Sec. 2.1.1) is a standard bulk-boundary construction: a Chern-Simons theory on a manifold with boundary requires boundary degrees of freedom, and those yield the chiral boson plus axion term of Eq. (54). That part is independent and well-supported by cited literature, so the later derivation of Eq. (63) from Eq. (54) is a legitimate consequence of the model. However, the abstract and conclusions claim a remnant of flux attachment appears after dimensional reduction of a pure Chern-Simons theory 'without the need of introducing dynamics by hand.' The compactified/Kaluza-Klein protocol, which is the pure bulk reduction, produces only a θ-term and a twist term; the chiral term is recovered only by imposing the unstated, nonderived conditions ∂xξ̃=0 and ∂tξ̃=2κ∂tφ̃. These conditions force the reduced theory to agree with Eq. (23) by construction, and they imply ∂t∂xφ̃=0, so the agreement is at best on-shell. The paper itself concedes that dimensional reduction is 'vaguely defined' and 'sensitive to the techniques used,' which weakens the claim that one specific protocol is the natural reduction. The self-citations to the composite particle duality are motivational rather than load-bearing, and the Rabello-Kundu form of the gauge potential is explicitly acknowledged as known; those do not add circularity. The central provenance claim is therefore partially circular: one of the two advertised routes reduces the target action to an imposed consistency condition, while the other route relies on added boundary degrees of freedom rather than a reduction of the closed bulk theory.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The ledger is light because the paper contains no data fitting and no new fitted constants. The main assumptions are standard topological field theory inputs and the authors' own composite particle duality, which is assumed valid. The only genuinely new proposed structure is the doubled chiral axion, introduced to cure the anomaly but not developed or given independent evidence.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The U(1) Chern-Simons level is quantized, and a Chern-Simons theory on a manifold with boundary must be supplemented by chiral edge degrees of freedom to cancel the gauge anomaly.
    Invoked in Sec 2.1.1 Eq (22) to justify the boundary action; standard Callan-Harvey anomaly inflow.
  • domain assumption Dimensional reduction of a topological field theory is protocol-dependent, and the boundary and compactification protocols both yield valid descendants of the parent theory.
    Explicitly stated as an Important Remark in Sec 2; the central claim depends on this caveated assumption.
  • domain assumption The reduced action can be minimally coupled to non-relativistic matter via J^μ a_μ, and the classical equations of motion (61)-(63) can be read off before quantization.
    Used in Sec 2.2 to derive the 1+1D flux attachment law; the validity of this coupling for arbitrary matter is assumed.
  • standard math The statistical gauge transformation is a pure gauge large transformation (Jordan-Wigner string) that transmutes statistics, with commutation relations computed via the BCH formula and ∂_x sgn(x)=2δ(x).
    Used throughout Sec 2.2.1; standard in 1D anyon constructions (Rabello, Kundu).
  • domain assumption In the Kaluza-Klein limit R_z→0 only the zero mode n=0 survives, and the Wilson-loop holonomy compactifies the reduced scalar field to [0,2π).
    Central to the compactified reduction in Sec 2.1.2 Eqs (43)-(50).
  • ad hoc to paper The composite particle duality of Refs [9-11] (the present authors) is valid and supplies the form of the 1D statistical gauge potential a_x ∝ n.
    Appendix B Eq (89) is used to interpret Eq (63) as the reduced flux attachment; this is the authors' own previous framework and is assumed rather than derived here.
invented entities (2)
  • Doubled chiral axion (2χ-axion)
    purpose: Resolves the anomalous Noether charge commutation by coupling left-chiral axions to left-chiral matter and right to right, restoring Eq (64).
    Proposed in Sec 2.2 as an optional consistency option; no specific physical realization or experimental signature is given.
  • Chiral axion field φ_{L,R}
    purpose: Encodes the transverse component of the statistical gauge field as a local measure of the reduced flux; appears in Eq (54).
    Borrowed from Ref [38] as the dynamical scalar of the reduced theory, not introduced here; it has no experimental handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Lower-Dimensional Remnant of Flux Attachment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IPPERLNN

@misc{pith2026241203346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Lower-Dimensional Remnant of Flux Attachment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IPPERLNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03346}
}
read the original abstract

Flux attachment is a mechanism allowing electric charges to capture magnetic flux in two spatial dimensions. Fundamentally, this is a consequence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect or, in field-theoretic language, of a Chern-Simons term. This is also intimately related to a transmutation of the exchange statistics of the original charges. We show that a remnant of this mechanism is found after a dimensional reduction of a pure Chern-Simons theory and its subsequent coupling to matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gas of charge-flux-tube complexes illustrative of a many-body Aharonov [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reduction of a punctured disk to an annulus. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Compactification on a circle and Kaluza-Klein reduction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dimensional reduction for anyons in the average-field approximation

    math.AP 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2D Chern–Simons–Schrödinger anyon model in a strong anisotropic trap is rigorously shown to reduce to the 1D quintic NLS model, at the level of energies and, conditionally, of dynamics.

  2. Encoding a topological gauge theory on a ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A ring-shaped Raman-coupled Bose gas is shown to encode the chiral BF topological gauge theory, with density-dependent magnetic flux producing quantized currents and chiral sound.

  3. Anyonization of bosons

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mobile impurity in a 1D Tonks-Girardeau gas realizes and probes anyonic correlations with a tunable statistical angle, evidenced by asymmetric momentum distributions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block =

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 'af...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Fradkin, Field theoretic aspects of condensed matter physics: An overview, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13234 (2023)

    E. Fradkin, Field theoretic aspects of condensed matter physics: An overview, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13234 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    S. C. Zhang, The chern-simons-landau-ginzburg theory of the fractional quantum hall effect, In Low-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories for Condensed Matter Physicists, pp. 191--224. World Scientific, doi:10.1142/9789814447027_0003 (1995)

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814447027_0003 1995

  5. [5]

    Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2 edn., doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015509 (2013)

    E. Fradkin, Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2 edn., doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015509 (2013)

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015509 2013

  6. [6]

    Wen, Topological order: From long-range entangled quantum matter to a unified origin of light and electrons, ISRN Condensed Matter Physics 2013 (2013), doi:10.1155/2013/198710

    X.-G. Wen, Topological order: From long-range entangled quantum matter to a unified origin of light and electrons, ISRN Condensed Matter Physics 2013 (2013), doi:10.1155/2013/198710

    doi:10.1155/2013/198710 2013

  7. [7]

    Z. F. Ezawa, Quantum Hall effects: Recent theoretical and experimental developments, World Scientific Publishing Company, 3 edn., doi:10.1142/8210 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1142/8210 2013

  8. [8]

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) 37(1), 1 (1977), doi:10.1007/BF02727953

    doi:10.1007/bf02727953 1977

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani and M. Greiner, Realization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statistical phase, Science 386(6725), 1055 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adi3252

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Fr \"o lian, C

    A. Fr \"o lian, C. S. Chisholm, E. Neri, C. R. Cabrera, R. Ramos, A. Celi and L. Tarruell, Realizing a 1d topological gauge theory in an optically dressed bec, Nature 608(7922), 293 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04943-3

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Valentí-Rojas, J

    G. Valentí-Rojas, J. Priestley and P. \"O hberg, The composite particle duality: A new class of topological quantum matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00825 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Valentí-Rojas, A

    G. Valentí-Rojas, A. J. Baker, A. Celi and P. \"Ohberg, Topological gauge fields and the composite particle duality, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023128 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023128

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Valent \' -Rojas and P

    G. Valent \' -Rojas and P. \"O hberg, Dual approach to soft-core anyonic lieb-liniger fluids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06108 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Aglietti, L

    U. Aglietti, L. Griguolo, R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi and D. Seminara, Anyons and chiral solitons on a line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4406 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4406

    1996 doi

  7. [15]

    Jackiw, V

    R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair and S.-Y. Pi, Chern-simons reduction and non-abelian fluid mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 62, 085018 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.085018

    2000 doi

  8. [16]

    Rougerie and Q

    N. Rougerie and Q. Yang, Anyons in a tight wave-guide and the tonks-girardeau gas, SciPost Physics Core 6(4), 079 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.4.079

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Rougerie and Q

    N. Rougerie and Q. Yang, Dimensional reduction for a system of 2d anyons, In Annales Henri Poincar \'e , pp. 1--32. Springer, doi:10.1007/s00023-024-01417-2 (2024)

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    U ber das paulische \

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, \"U ber das paulische \"a quivalenzverbot , Zeitschrift f\"ur Physik 47, 631 (1928), doi:10.1007/BF01331938

    1928 doi

  11. [19]

    Girardeau, Relationship between systems of impenetrable bosons and fermions in one dimension, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1(6), 516 (1960), doi:10.1063/1.1703687

    M. Girardeau, Relationship between systems of impenetrable bosons and fermions in one dimension, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1(6), 516 (1960), doi:10.1063/1.1703687

    1960 doi

  12. [20]

    Coleman, Quantum sine-gordon equation as the massive thirring model, Phys

    S. Coleman, Quantum sine-gordon equation as the massive thirring model, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2088

    1975 doi

  13. [21]

    Valiente, Bose-fermi dualities for arbitrary one-dimensional quantum systems in the universal low-energy regime, Phys

    M. Valiente, Bose-fermi dualities for arbitrary one-dimensional quantum systems in the universal low-energy regime, Phys. Rev. A 102, 053304 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.053304

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Cheon and T

    T. Cheon and T. Shigehara, Fermion-boson duality of one-dimensional quantum particles with generalized contact interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2536 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2536

    1999 doi

  15. [23]

    Y. M. Shirokov, Algebra of one-dimensional generalized functions, Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika 39(3), 291 (1979), doi:10.1007/BF01017992

    1979 doi

  16. [24]

    Valiente, Universal duality transformations in interacting one-dimensional quantum systems, Phys

    M. Valiente, Universal duality transformations in interacting one-dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 103, L021302 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L021302

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    C. G. Callan Jr and J. A. Harvey, Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls, Nuclear Physics B 250(1-4), 427 (1985), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90489-4

    1985 doi

  18. [26]

    Stone, Edge waves in the quantum hall effect, Annals of Physics 207(1), 38 (1991), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(91)90177-A

    M. Stone, Edge waves in the quantum hall effect, Annals of Physics 207(1), 38 (1991), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(91)90177-A

    1991 doi

  19. [27]

    Witten, Quantum field theory and the jones polynomial, Communications in Mathematical Physics 121(3), 351 (1989), doi:10.1007/BF01217730

    E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the jones polynomial, Communications in Mathematical Physics 121(3), 351 (1989), doi:10.1007/BF01217730

    1989 doi

  20. [28]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Taming the conformal zoo, Physics Letters B 220(3), 422 (1989), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90897-6

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    X. G. Wen, Chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. B 41, 12838 (1990), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.12838

    1990 doi

  22. [30]

    Wen, Topological orders in rigid states, Int

    X.-G. Wen, Topological orders in rigid states, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4(02), 239 (1990), doi:10.1142/S0217979290000139

    1990 doi

  23. [31]

    Wen, Topological orders and chern-simons theory in strongly correlated quantum liquid, Int

    X.-G. Wen, Topological orders and chern-simons theory in strongly correlated quantum liquid, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5(10), 1641 (1991), doi:10.1142/S0217979291001541

    1991 doi

  24. [32]

    I. P. Levkivskyi, J. Fr\"ohlich and E. V. Sukhorukov, Theory of fractional quantum hall interferometers, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245105 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.245105

    2012 doi

  25. [33]

    Bettelheim, A

    E. Bettelheim, A. G. Abanov and P. Wiegmann, Nonlinear quantum shock waves in fractional quantum hall edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 246401 (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.246401

    2006 doi

  26. [34]

    Wiegmann, Nonlinear hydrodynamics and fractionally quantized solitons at the fractional quantum hall edge, Phys

    P. Wiegmann, Nonlinear hydrodynamics and fractionally quantized solitons at the fractional quantum hall edge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206810 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.206810

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    Nardin and I

    A. Nardin and I. Carusotto, Linear and nonlinear edge dynamics of trapped fractional quantum hall droplets, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033320 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.033320

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Karch, D

    A. Karch, D. Tong and C. Turner, A Web of 2d Dualities: Z_2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants , SciPost Phys. 7, 7 (2019), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.1.007

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Senthil, D

    T. Senthil, D. T. Son, C. Wang and C. Xu, Duality between (2+ 1) d quantum critical points, Physics Reports 827, 1 (2019), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.09.001

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Okuda, K

    T. Okuda, K. Saito and S. Yokoyama, U (1) spin chern-simons theory and arf invariants in two dimensions, Nuclear Physics B 962, 115272 (2021), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115272

    2021

  31. [39]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Topological gauge theories and group cohomology, Communications in Mathematical Physics 129, 393 (1990), doi:10.1007/BF02096988

    1990 doi

  32. [40]

    Jackiw and S.-Y

    R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, Soliton solutions to the gauged nonlinear schr \"o dinger equation on the plane , Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(25), 2969 (1990), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2969

    1990 doi

  33. [41]

    S. J. Benetton Rabello, 1d generalized statistics gas: A gauge theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4007 (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4007

    1996 doi

  34. [42]

    Kundu, Exact solution of double function bose gas through an interacting anyon gas , Phys

    A. Kundu, Exact solution of double function bose gas through an interacting anyon gas , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1275 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1275

    1999 doi

  35. [43]

    Jackiw, V

    R. Jackiw, V. Nair, S. Pi and A. Polychronakos, Perfect fluid theory and its extensions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37(42), R327 (2004), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/42/R01

    2004 doi

  36. [44]

    E. C. Marino, Quantum field theory approach to condensed matter physics, Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781139696548 (2017)

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    H. A. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette , Zeit. f \"u r Phys. 71 , 205 (1931), 10.1007\

    1931

  38. [46]

    Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today

    P. Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today... , http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.