Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Reducing nuisance prior sensitivity via non-linear reparameterization, with application to EFT analyses of large-scale structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.03503 v3 pith:ATIH6J43 submitted 2024-12-04 astro-ph.CO

Reducing nuisance prior sensitivity via non-linear reparameterization, with application to EFT analyses of large-scale structure

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords nuisanceparametersmodelscosmologicaldatapriorsapplicationexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many physical models contain nuisance parameters that quantify unknown properties of an experiment that are not of primary relevance. Typically, these cannot be measured except by fitting the models to the data from the experiment, requiring simultaneous measurement of interesting parameters that are our target of inference and nuisance terms that are not directly of interest. A recent example of this is fitting Effective Field Theory (EFT) models to large-scale structure (LSS) data to make cosmological inferences. These models have a large number of nuisance parameters that are typically correlated with cosmological parameters in the posterior, leading to strong dependence on the nuisance parameter priors. We introduce a reparametrization method that leverages Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to decorrelate nuisance parameters from the parameters of interest in the likelihood, even in the presence of non-linear relationships. This reparametrization forms a natural basis within which to define priors that are independent between nuisance and target parameters: the separation means that the marginal posterior for cosmological parameters does not depend on simple priors placed on nuisance terms. In application to EFT models using LSS data, we demonstrate that the proposed approach leads to robust cosmological inference.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First full-shape joint analysis of the two- and three-point correlation functions on real data: $\Lambda$CDM cosmological constraints from BOSS DR12

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    First joint 2PCF+3PCF full-shape analysis on BOSS DR12 real data improves σ(h) by ~29%, σ(ω_cdm) by ~10%, and σ(A_s) by ~24% over 2PCF alone via extra BAO information in 3PCF triangles.

  2. Alleviating prior dependencies for DESI DR1 clustering fits through reparameterization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Jeffreys prior over EFTofLSS coefficients mitigates projection effects in DESI DR1 power spectrum multipole fits, recentering posteriors for late-time expansion parameters.

  3. Alleviating prior dependencies for DESI DR1 clustering fits through reparameterization

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A hybrid Jeffreys+baseline prior removes multi-σ prior-volume projection in DESI DR1 full-shape fits of H0, w0, and wa, yielding late-time expansion constraints consistent with HOD-informed Bayesian and frequentist analyses.

  4. Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 5. Cosmological Constraints with Simulation-Based Priors

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Simulation-based priors applied to DESI DR1 full-shape data sharpen cosmological constraints (σ8 error halved) and yield Mν<0.090 eV in w0waCDM, but the results depend on HOD modeling assumptions.

  5. Testing Scale-Dependent Modified Gravity with DESI DR1

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

    DESI DR1 constrains the modified gravity parameter to log10 |f_R0| < -4.59 at 95% CL, implying no detectable fifth force on scales below about 18 Mpc.