Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Hidden Computations in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.04537 v1 pith:YYQTYRNY submitted 2024-12-05 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelsreasoninghiddencharacterschain-of-thoughtfillerlanguageopen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly enhanced the reasoning abilities of large language models. However, recent studies have shown that models can still perform complex reasoning tasks even when the CoT is replaced with filler(hidden) characters (e.g., "..."), leaving open questions about how models internally process and represent reasoning steps. In this paper, we investigate methods to decode these hidden characters in transformer models trained with filler CoT sequences. By analyzing layer-wise representations using the logit lens method and examining token rankings, we demonstrate that the hidden characters can be recovered without loss of performance. Our findings provide insights into the internal mechanisms of transformer models and open avenues for improving interpretability and transparency in language model reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pause Tokens Strictly Increase the Expressivity of Constant-Depth Transformers

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims pause tokens strictly increase constant-precision, constant-depth Transformer expressivity from a subset of AC0 to AC0 (and log-precision to TC0), but the constant-precision proof is not sound as written.

Pith tools