Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05449 v1 pith:TCIJZZ56 submitted 2024-12-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords collaborationmulti-agentagentscapabilitiesenterprisecoordinationpayloadreferencing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in problem solving. Through combining many intelligent agents, multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a promising approach to tackle complex, multi-faceted problems that exceed the capabilities of single AI agents. However, designing the collaboration protocols and evaluating the effectiveness of these systems remains a significant challenge, especially for enterprise applications. This report addresses these challenges by presenting a comprehensive evaluation of coordination and routing capabilities in a novel multi-agent collaboration framework. We evaluate two key operational modes: (1) a coordination mode enabling complex task completion through parallel communication and payload referencing, and (2) a routing mode for efficient message forwarding between agents. We benchmark on a set of handcrafted scenarios from three enterprise domains, which are publicly released with the report. For coordination capabilities, we demonstrate the effectiveness of inter-agent communication and payload referencing mechanisms, achieving end-to-end goal success rates of 90%. Our analysis yields several key findings: multi-agent collaboration enhances goal success rates by up to 70% compared to single-agent approaches in our benchmarks; payload referencing improves performance on code-intensive tasks by 23%; latency can be substantially reduced with a routing mechanism that selectively bypasses agent orchestration. These findings offer valuable guidance for enterprise deployments of multi-agent systems and advance the development of scalable, efficient multi-agent collaboration frameworks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAGPIE is a 158-scenario benchmark showing large language model agents misclassify and leak contextually private information in multi-agent collaboration, even under explicit privacy instructions.

  2. Know the Ropes: A Heuristic Strategy for LLM-based Multi-Agent System Design

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A heuristic framework that decomposes known algorithms into typed LLM-agent subtasks lifts small-model accuracy on knapsack and assignment problems from near-zero to high levels after fixing one bottleneck agent.

  3. Supporting Construction Worker Well-Being with a Multi-Agent Conversational AI System

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM chatbot with separate safety, HR, and peer personas outperformed a single generic chatbot on usability, psychological needs, social presence, and trust in a 12-person role-play study.

  4. ThinkTank: A Framework for Generalizing Domain-Specific AI Agent Systems into Universal Collaborative Intelligence Platforms

    cs.MA 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ThinkTank generalizes scientific collaboration roles, meeting formats, and retrieval-augmented knowledge integration into one reusable multi-agent platform.

Pith tools