Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06113 v1 pith:SAHVPI4I submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords privacylanguagellmsprivacy-preservingapplicationslargemodelsattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized natural language processing, enabling applications in diverse domains such as healthcare, finance and education. However, the growing reliance on extensive data for training and inference has raised significant privacy concerns, ranging from data leakage to adversarial attacks. This survey comprehensively explores the landscape of privacy-preserving mechanisms tailored for LLMs, including differential privacy, federated learning, cryptographic protocols, and trusted execution environments. We examine their efficacy in addressing key privacy challenges, such as membership inference and model inversion attacks, while balancing trade-offs between privacy and model utility. Furthermore, we analyze privacy-preserving applications of LLMs in privacy-sensitive domains, highlighting successful implementations and inherent limitations. Finally, this survey identifies emerging research directions, emphasizing the need for novel frameworks that integrate privacy by design into the lifecycle of LLMs. By synthesizing state-of-the-art approaches and future trends, this paper provides a foundation for developing robust, privacy-preserving large language models that safeguard sensitive information without compromising performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Aligning Personalized Conversational Recommendation Agents with Users' Privacy Preferences

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Privacy management for conversational AI agents is reframed as a dynamic alignment problem in which agents learn a user's latent privacy-utility reward function from feedback.

  2. ThinkTank: A Framework for Generalizing Domain-Specific AI Agent Systems into Universal Collaborative Intelligence Platforms

    cs.MA 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    ThinkTank generalizes scientific collaboration roles, meeting formats, and retrieval-augmented knowledge integration into one reusable multi-agent platform.

Pith tools