Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

VariFace: Fair and Diverse Synthetic Dataset Generation for Face Recognition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06235 v2 pith:ZJ4F265I submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords facedatasetsrecognitionrealsyntheticdatasetperformancevariface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The use of large-scale, web-scraped datasets to train face recognition models has raised significant privacy and bias concerns. Synthetic methods mitigate these concerns and provide scalable and controllable face generation to enable fair and accurate face recognition. However, existing synthetic datasets display limited intraclass and interclass diversity and do not match the face recognition performance obtained using real datasets. Here, we propose VariFace, a two-stage diffusion-based pipeline to create fair and diverse synthetic face datasets to train face recognition models. Specifically, we introduce three methods: Face Recognition Consistency to refine demographic labels, Face Vendi Score Guidance to improve interclass diversity, and Divergence Score Conditioning to balance the identity preservation-intraclass diversity trade-off. When constrained to the same dataset size, VariFace considerably outperforms previous synthetic datasets (0.9200 $\rightarrow$ 0.9405) and achieves comparable performance to face recognition models trained with real data (Real Gap = -0.0065). In an unconstrained setting, VariFace not only consistently achieves better performance compared to previous synthetic methods across dataset sizes but also, for the first time, outperforms the real dataset (CASIA-WebFace) across six evaluation datasets. This sets a new state-of-the-art performance with an average face verification accuracy of 0.9567 (Real Gap = +0.0097) across LFW, CFP-FP, CPLFW, AgeDB, and CALFW datasets and 0.9366 (Real Gap = +0.0380) on the RFW dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Use of Synthetic Data for Threshold Calibration in Face Recognition: Performance and Security Implications for Border Control Systems

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Thresholds calibrated on synthetic faces transfer poorly to unconstrained real data at low FMR and increase morph-attack acceptance, so high-security deployments still need real-world validation.

  2. Benchmarking Face Recognition without Real Faces

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MorphFace and Vec2Face can replace real photo benchmarks for ranking face recognition models.

  3. On Applicability of Synthetic Datasets for Facial Expression Recognition

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Synthetic datasets created via diffusion models, GAN editing, and pseudo-labeling can substitute for or augment real data to improve facial expression recognition while respecting privacy constraints.

Pith tools