Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06435 v3 pith:MZJFWOLA submitted 2024-12-09 cs.AI

Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy

classification cs.AI
keywords activitiesagentdesiresagentsautonomouslyautonomycurrentdaily
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Desires motivate humans to interact autonomously with the complex world. In contrast, current AI agents require explicit task specifications, such as instructions or reward functions, which constrain their autonomy and behavioral diversity. In this paper, we introduce a Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) that can enable a large language model (LLM) to autonomously propose and select tasks, motivated by satisfying its multi-dimensional desires. Specifically, the motivational framework of D2A is mainly constructed by a dynamic Value System, inspired by the Theory of Needs. It incorporates an understanding of human-like desires, such as the need for social interaction, personal fulfillment, and self-care. At each step, the agent evaluates the value of its current state, proposes a set of candidate activities, and selects the one that best aligns with its intrinsic motivations. We conduct experiments on Concordia, a text-based simulator, to demonstrate that our agent generates coherent, contextually relevant daily activities while exhibiting variability and adaptability similar to human behavior. A comparative analysis with other LLM-based agents demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances the rationality of the simulated activities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Step-Level Preference Learning for Generative Agents in Social Simulations

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Step-level human preference data collected via SimPref, then SFT+DPO, improves long-horizon social-simulation behavior of open-weight LLM agents on held-out events.

  2. LLMs Reading the Rhythms of Daily Life: Aligned Understanding for Behavior Prediction and Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BUA aligns LLMs to behavior data via sequence embeddings and a three-stage curriculum, outperforming prior methods on prediction and generation in two real-world datasets.

  3. AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society

    cs.SI 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AgentSociety is a large-scale LLM agent-based social simulator validated on polarization, UBI, disasters, and sustainability issues with alignment to real experiments.

  4. Matryoshka Agent: Unfolding Sub-Agents for Long-Horizon Machine Learning Engineering

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Matryoshka Agent’s orchestrator–sub-agent hierarchy plus tree-ranked RL raises MLE-Dojo HumanRank, letting a 4B orchestrator approach o4-mini and giving a 30B coder up to 36.7% relative gain.

  5. Bridging Values and Behavior: A Hierarchical Framework for Proactive Embodied Agents

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ValuePlanner is a hierarchical architecture that uses LLMs to generate value-based subgoals and PDDL planners to produce executable actions, enabling self-directed behavior in embodied agents.