Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Nonrelativistic Proca stars: Spherical stationary and multi-frequency states

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Proca star ground states are spherical and polarized.

desk verdict Solid variational ground-state theorem, honest mapping to known boson stars, but the multi-frequency continuum is confined to the λs=0 fine-tuned surface and not yet numerically verified. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06901 v2 pith:V4OLWWKB submitted 2024-12-09 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Emmanuel Chávez Nambo , Alberto Diez-Tejedor , Edgar Preciado-Govea , Armando A. Roque , Olivier Sarbach This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords ProcastarsnonrelativisticbosonGross-Pitaevskii-Poissonsystemvectordarkmattermulti-frequencystatesgroundstatepolarizationU(3)symmetry
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the nonrelativistic limit of a self-gravitating, self-interacting spin-1 (vector) field, the setting in which ultralight vector dark matter would form galactic halos. Its central result is an existence and characterization theorem: when the effective coupling $\lambda_0 = \lambda_n$ for $\lambda_s \ge 0$ and $\lambda_0 = \lambda_n - |\lambda_s|$ for $\lambda_s < 0$ is nonnegative, the energy at fixed particle number is bounded below and has a global minimum, and every such minimum is a stationary, spherically symmetric Proca star of constant polarization (linear if $\lambda_s>0$, circular if $\lambda_s<0$). The paper also identifies a symmetry-enhanced sector $\lambda_s=0$ in which the theory has an accidental U(3) symmetry, allowing equilibrium configurations whose wave function oscillates at two or three distinct frequencies. These multi-frequency states form a continuum in solution space that connects stationary states of constant polarization, whereas stationary states alone form a discrete set for fixed particle number. A sympathetic reader should care because this fixes the expected ground-state shape of vector dark matter halos and predicts a new family of equilibria if spin-spin couplings are absent.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $s=1$ Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson system, a nonlinear Schrodinger-type equation for a three-component complex vector field $\vec{\psi}(t,\vec{x})$ coupled to a Newtonian potential $U$ satisfying Poisson's equation, with two self-interaction parameters $\lambda_n$ (density-density) and $\lambda_s$ (spin-spin). The argument runs through the energy functional $E=T+\lambda_n F_n+\lambda_s F_s-D$, its behaviour under the scaling $\vec{\psi}\mapsto \nu^{3/2}\vec{\psi}(\nu\vec{x})$, and the effective coupling $\lambda_0$ defined in Eq. (32), which decides whether $E$ is bounded below at fixed $N$. For the minimizer claim, the paper uses a polarization decomposition with the inequality $\lambda_n F_n+\lambda_s F_s\ge \lambda_0 F_n$ and the symmetric decreasing rearrangement to reduce any minimizer to a spherical, constantly polarized profile. For the multi-frequency sector, the machinery is the accidental U(3) symmetry present when $\lambda_s=0$, with the conserved tensor $\hat{Q}=\int \vec{\psi}^*\otimes\vec{\psi}\,dV$, whose diagonalization turns the equilibrium equations into a nonlinear multi-eigenvalue problem with frequencies $E_\lambda$; the Sturm oscillation theorem then orders the radial components by node number and shows that components with equal node numbers are proportional, hence stationary.

What would settle it

Adapt the shooting code to a small nonzero $\lambda_s$ (for instance $\lambda_s=10^{-6}\lambda_n$) and search for a branch of multi-frequency solutions of Eq. (48) with distinct frequencies $E_x\neq E_y$; a persistent branch would falsify the claim that multi-frequency states require $\lambda_s=0$. Alternatively, find a global minimizer for $\lambda_0\ge 0$ that is not a stationary, spherically symmetric constant-polarization state, for example a multi-frequency or radially polarized configuration with energy below the constantly polarized nodeless state at the same $N$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: for the $s=1$ Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson system describing a nonrelativistic self-gravitating vector field, all equilibrium configurations in the generic sector ($\lambda_s\neq 0$) are stationary states $\vec{\psi}(t,\vec{x})=e^{-iEt}\sigma(r)\hat{\epsilon}$, while in the symmetry-enhanced sector ($\lambda_s=0$) there are also multi-frequency states $\vec{\psi}(t,\vec{x})=\sum_{\lambda=1}^3 e^{-iE_\lambda t}\sigma_\lambda(r)\hat{e}_\lambda$. The proof shows that when $\lambda_0\ge 0$ the energy functional at fixed $N$ is bounded below and attains its minimum at a stationary, spherically symmetric state of constant polarization with monotonically decreasing positive radial profile; for $\lambda_s>0$ the polarization is linear, for $\lambda_s<0$ it is circular, and in the free theory ($\lambda_n=\lambda_s=0$) this ground state is unique up to translations and rigid unitary transformations. In the symmetry-enhanced sector, multi-frequency solutions are shown to fill regions of the mass-radius and energy-particle-number diagrams, bounded by the $n=0$ and $n=1$ constant-polarization stationary states; the paper constructs examples numerically, computes their charges and energies, and verifies that the constantly polarized nodeless state has the lowest energy.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum of multi-frequency Proca stars rests on the spin-spin coupling $\lambda_s$ being exactly zero; any nonzero $\lambda_s$, no matter how small, breaks the U(3) symmetry and eliminates those states, although the ground-state theorem itself does not depend on this fine-tuning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\lambda_0\ge 0$, a Proca star with fixed particle number always possesses a ground state, and that ground state is spherical, stationary, and constantly polarized with negative energy, providing a candidate stable endpoint for vector dark matter condensation.
  • If spin-spin self-interactions are absent ($\lambda_s=0$), equilibrium solutions are not isolated: multi-frequency states form continuous families that interpolate between the $n=0$ and $n=1$ constant-polarization stationary states in the mass-radius and energy diagrams.
  • Radially polarized Proca stars are excited states relative to constantly polarized ones when $\lambda_0\ge 0$, so the nonrelativistic limit of the original spherically symmetric relativistic Proca stars is an excited configuration rather than a ground state.
  • In the generic sector $\lambda_s\neq 0$, no multi-frequency states exist; only stationary linear, circular, or radial polarizations are possible, and the degeneracy among constant-polarization states is broken.
  • Circularly polarized Proca stars carry macroscopic spin angular momentum $\vec{S}=\alpha N\hat{e}_z$ despite a spherically symmetric density, implying the corresponding relativistic rotating stars should be non-spherical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if ultralight vector dark matter has any nonzero spin-spin coupling $\lambda_s$, multi-frequency halos are forbidden, so detecting a stably oscillating multi-frequency core would place an upper bound on $|\lambda_s|$ and effectively confirm an accidental U(3) symmetry in the low-energy theory.
  • Beyond the paper: the continuous family of multi-frequency states that links ground and excited stationary states suggests that slow dynamical processes could drive a Proca star from one stationary branch to another; the announced linear-stability analysis should reveal whether these states are orbitally stable or decay toward the ground state.
  • Beyond the paper: because constantly polarized Proca stars coincide with $\ell=0$ boson stars (with coupling $\lambda_0$) and radial Proca stars coincide with $\ell=1$ boson stars, existing results on scalar boson star stability, collisions, and gravitational-wave signals can be imported to the vector case at least in the free and $\lambda_s=0$ sectors.
  • Beyond the paper: the proof leaves open whether the ground state is unique for $\lambda_0>0$; a systematic numerical search for minimizers with different radial profiles but the same particle number and energy would settle the uniqueness question left open in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a nonrelativistic effective field theory for a selfgravitating, selfinteracting massive vector field, the s=1 Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson system, and studies its spherically symmetric equilibrium configurations. In the generic sector (λs≠0) the admissible equilibria are stationary, single-frequency states; in the symmetry-enhanced sector (λs=0) the theory acquires an accidental U(3) symmetry and admits, in addition, multi-frequency states whose components oscillate with two or three distinct frequencies. The authors prove that for λ0≥0 (λ0=λn for λs≥0 and λn−|λs| for λs<0) a global minimum of the energy at fixed particle number exists and is a stationary, spherically symmetric, constant-polarization state, linearly polarized for λs>0 and circularly polarized for λs<0. They then numerically construct stationary and multi-frequency solutions, reporting a one-parameter family of multi-frequency states with fixed particle number that fills a region in the mass-radius and energy diagrams, connecting the nodeless and first-excited linearly polarized stationary states.

Significance. The analytic ground-state theorem in Sec. III B is a rigorous, well-grounded result: it reduces the vector problem to the scalar Choquard functional, uses symmetric decreasing rearrangements to enforce spherical symmetry, and identifies the polarization through the equality conditions of the spin inequality. This is a genuine variational characterization, not a fit, and it yields a falsifiable prediction (linear versus circular polarization depending on the sign of λs). The multi-frequency states are novel and connect the Proca-star literature to multi-state boson stars; the numerical results suggest a rich solution space in the symmetry-enhanced sector. However, the existence of the multi-frequency continuum is established only numerically, and the continuum itself is confined to the exactly fine-tuned surface λs=0, which substantially limits its physical robustness. If the numerical evidence is validated and the fine-tuning caveat is made prominent, the paper would be a solid contribution to the nonrelativistic vector dark matter and soliton literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V, Figs. 10 and 15] The existence of the one-parameter continuum of multi-frequency states is a central claim of the paper, but it is supported only by a shooting method. No residuals, convergence tests, mesh-dependence checks, or independent verification of the eigenvalues are reported, and the code is not made available. Since a shooting method can in principle produce spurious families near turning points or lose accuracy for large radii, please provide a quantitative accuracy assessment (for example, ODE residuals after the numerical solution, comparison of the energy eigenvalues computed from Eq. (E2a) with those obtained from the asymptotic fit, or a convergence study under increasing integration interval and decreasing step size). Without such validation, the existence of a genuine continuum rather than a discrete set of numerically connected points remains unsubstantiated.
  2. [Sec. II B (Eq. (12)) and Sec. III C] The multi-frequency equilibria and the continuum connecting stationary states require λs=0 exactly, because the tensor Q is conserved only in that case (Eq. (12)). The paper correctly restricts the symmetry-enhanced sector to λs=0, but the abstract and conclusions present the continuum as a headline result without emphasizing that any nonzero λs, no matter how small, destroys these states exactly, not perturbatively: the generic-sector argument in Sec. III implies that all fixed-N equilibria are single-frequency stationary states for λs≠0. Please add an explicit discussion of this fine-tuning issue in the abstract and conclusions, and either temper the claim or justify why the λs=0 surface is physically relevant (for example, by a symmetry-protection argument or by showing that the continuum approximately survives for small λs in a perturbative sense).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III C] The text contains two consecutive 'open question' passages at the end of the section that are redundant and could be merged into a single statement.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The time labels t1, t2, t3 are defined with E for the stationary rows but with Ex for the multi-frequency row; please use a consistent notation and clarify that E is the single frequency for stationary states.
  3. [Sec. I, Eq. (1)] The symbol 'i' is used both for the imaginary unit and as an index (e.g., ψi), which is occasionally confusing; consider using a roman upright i for the imaginary unit or a different index letter.
  4. [Sec. IV A, after Eq. (45)] The abbreviation 'c.f.' should be 'cf.' in several places (for example, 'c.f. Eqs. (32) in Ref. [45]').
  5. [Sec. V, Eq. (52a)] The '±' sign is introduced as referring to repulsive and attractive selfinteractions, but the relation to the earlier parameter λ0 in Eq. (32) and to λ* is not spelled out; a brief note connecting both would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ground-state theorem and multi-frequency construction are derived from the action plus external variational results, with self-citations only methodological.

full rationale

The central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The ground-state theorem in Sec. III B is a genuine variational reduction: the identity |∇ψ|²=|∇f|²+n|∇ε|² and the spin bound |s|≤n give E[ψ]≥Escalar[f] with λ0 defined by Eq. (32), and equality conditions force constant linear/circular polarization; the existence of the minimizer of Escalar is imported from external results (Lieb [46], Lions [48,49]), not from the authors' own work. The multi-frequency states in Sec. III C are derived, not assumed: fixing the conserved tensor Q when λs=0 leads to the eigenvalue problem Êψ=Ĥψ (Eq. (25)), and allowing the commuting unitary to be time-dependent yields ψ(t)=e^{-iÊt}ψ(0) (Eq. (26)); no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The numerical shooting in Sec. V solves the resulting boundary-value problem forward; absence of residual and convergence data is a robustness concern, not circularity. Self-citations to Refs. [42] and [45] supply a shooting methodology and a scaling-argument template, but both arguments are reproduced in the text, so the citations are not load-bearing. The restriction to the exact λs=0 surface for multi-frequency states is a parametric sensitivity and fine-tuning limitation acknowledged by Eq. (12), not a circular step. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and independently supported.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard mathematical results (Choquard minimizer, Sturm-Liouville theory), the EFT truncation at mass dimension 6, and the exact vanishing of λs for the multi-frequency sector. No free parameters are fitted to data; the model constants are inputs and the shooting variables are boundary data for a BVP.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Lieb's theorem on existence (and uniqueness for the free case) of minimizers of the Choquard functional, plus concentration-compactness arguments.
    Invoked in Sec. III B to establish that a global minimum of the scalar functional E_scalar[f] exists and is spherically symmetric up to translations; based on Refs. [46], [48], [49].
  • standard math Sturm oscillation (nodal) theorem for one-dimensional Schrödinger operators.
    Used in Sec. IV B to order the frequencies by node number, to conclude that components with distinct node numbers are orthogonal, and to justify that all σ_i are real up to phases.
  • domain assumption Effective field theory truncation at mass dimension 6 in the vector field.
    The action (1) keeps only operators of mass dimension ≤6; higher-derivative and higher-order terms are neglected, as stated in App. A. This is standard EFT practice but is a model assumption.
  • domain assumption Exact vanishing of the spin-spin coupling, λs=0, for the symmetry-enhanced sector.
    The U(3) symmetry and the resulting multi-frequency equilibrium states exist only when λs=0, as shown by Eq. (12) and the surrounding discussion in Sec. II B. This is a fine-tuned condition, not a symmetry of the full relativistic theory.
  • domain assumption Newtonian gravity and the nonrelativistic limit of the underlying vector field theory.
    The whole paper works in the nonrelativistic regime; the derivation in App. B shows that the effective action (1) arises from the nonrelativistic limit of Einstein-Proca theory with quartic self-interactions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonrelativistic Proca stars: Spherical stationary and multi-frequency states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V4OLWWKB

@misc{pith2026241206901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonrelativistic Proca stars: Spherical stationary and multi-frequency states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V4OLWWKB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06901}
}
abstract

In this paper we follow an effective theory approach to study the nonrelativistic limit of a selfgravitating and selfinteracting massive vector field. Our effective theory is characterized by three parameters: the field's mass $m_0$ and the selfinteraction constants $\lambda_n$ and $\lambda_s$. For definiteness, we focus on a systematic study of the equilibrium configurations, commonly referred to as Proca stars when they have finite energy. We identify two different types of Proca stars, depending on the specific sector of the effective theory that we are exploring. In the generic sector, defined by $\lambda_s\neq 0$, all equilibrium configurations are stationary states described by wave functions that evolve harmonically in time. However, in the symmetry-enhanced sector, for which $\lambda_s=0$, there exist multi-frequency states whose wave functions oscillate with two or three distinct frequencies in addition to the stationary states. We determine the conditions under which a ground state configuration with fixed particle number exists. When these conditions are met, we prove that the lowest energy is reached by a stationary spherically symmetric configuration of constant polarization that is linear or circular depending on the sign of $\lambda_s$. We numerically construct some illustrative examples of spherical stationary and multi-frequency solutions, analyze their properties, and compare them with our analytical predictions. Unlike stationary states and other soliton configurations, which form a discrete set in the solution space associated with fixed particle number, the symmetry-enhanced sector exhibits a continuum of solutions with multi-frequency states connecting stationary states of constant polarization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06901 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. illustrates the classification of spherical equilib￾rium configurations that appear in the different sectors of our effective theory, whereas in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: through the color bar is the energy of each state in this family. As can be appreciated, the configuration with σx0 = 1 and σy0 = 0 has the lowest energy, as expected, whereas the energy is growing monotonously when mov￾ing along the family towards the state with σx0 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generating Moving Field Initial Conditions with Spatially Varying Boost

    physics.comp-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 'spatially varying boost' algorithm assigns arbitrary, position-dependent bulk velocities to field initial data by composing local Lorentz boosts, demonstrated on solitons, Proca fields, and spin-1 wave dark matter.

  2. Extreme mass-ratio inspirals into Newtonian Proca stars

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Newtonian Proca stars, a perturbing object on a circular orbit loses nearly the same energy in the vector ground state as in the scalar boson-star ground state (within ~20%), while the spherical excited Proca stat...

  3. The continuum spectrum of nonrelativistic multi-frequency Proca stars

    gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    At fixed particle number, spherical multi-frequency Proca stars form continuous 1- and 2-parameter families interpolating between discrete stationary states, and a subset with a nodeless component is linearly stable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    F ree theory In absence of gravity, a non-selfinteracting complex- valued vector field Aµ(t, ⃗ x) of mass m0 is described in terms of the action S = Z d4x − 1 2 F ∗ µνF µν − m2 0A∗ µAµ . (B2) If we perform a 1 + 3 decomposition of the vector field Aµ = (A0, Ai) we can write this expression in the form: S = Z d4x ˙A∗ i ˙Ai + ∂iA∗ 0∂iA0 − ∂iA∗ j ∂iAj − ˙A∗ ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (B5) requires the addition of the new terms: Z d4x λ1 4m2 0 −(a∗ 0a0)2 + 2a∗ 0a0ψ∗ i ψi − (ψ∗ i ψi)2 (B9) + λ2 4m2 0 −(a∗ 0a0)2 + a2 0ψ∗ i ψi∗ + a∗2 0 ψiψi − ψiψiψ∗ j ψj∗

    Selfinteractions In presence of selfinteractions, Eq. (B5) requires the addition of the new terms: Z d4x λ1 4m2 0 −(a∗ 0a0)2 + 2a∗ 0a0ψ∗ i ψi − (ψ∗ i ψi)2 (B9) + λ2 4m2 0 −(a∗ 0a0)2 + a2 0ψ∗ i ψi∗ + a∗2 0 ψiψi − ψiψiψ∗ j ψj∗ . In the nonrelativistic limit, the third and seventh terms dominate over the other five, and hence the constraint in Eq. (B7) is un...

    work page

  3. [3]

    symmetric decreasing rearrangement

    Discarding local minima of the energy functional Third, Eq. (31b) implies that a critical point at ν = 1 corresponds to a local minimum of E[ ⃗ψν] if T [ ⃗ψ] + 3 λnFn[n] + 3 λsFs[⃗ s] is positive and to a local maximum if it is negative. In particular, an equilibrium state ⃗ψ(t, ⃗ x) cannot be a (local) minimum of the en- ergy functional with respect to a...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Gravity Finally, we include the effects of gravity, which are cod- ified in the spacetime metric gµν(t, ⃗ x). For that purpose, it is convenient to decompose the spacetime line element in the form [45] ds2 = − [1 + 2Φ(t, ⃗ x)] dt2 + [1 − 2Ψ(t, ⃗ x)] δjk dxjdxk, (B11) which has been expressed in the Newtonian gauge and codifies only the scalar degrees of f...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (C2) leads to ˆϵ = (ˆϵ · ˆϵ)ˆϵ∗, (C4) which, together with the condition ˆϵ∗ · ˆϵ = 1, implies that ˆϵ is real-valued up to a global phase factor

    In the first case, Eq. (C2) leads to ˆϵ = (ˆϵ · ˆϵ)ˆϵ∗, (C4) which, together with the condition ˆϵ∗ · ˆϵ = 1, implies that ˆϵ is real-valued up to a global phase factor. This is the condition for linear polarization. In the second case, if one writes ˆϵ = ˆϵR + iˆϵI (with ˆϵR and ˆϵI denoting the real 26 and imaginary parts of ˆϵ, respectively) then the e...

    work page

  6. [6]

    D. J. Kaup, Klein-Gordon Geon, Phys. Rev. 172, 1331 (1968)

    work page 1968

  7. [7]

    Ruffini and S

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev. 187, 1767 (1969). 22 Alternatively, one can use the asymptotic form described in Eq. (E1) to obtain Ei. This alternative form to compute the energy eigenvalue was used to check the validity of the results obtained f...

    work page 1969

  8. [8]

    Jetzer, Boson stars, Phys

    P. Jetzer, Boson stars, Phys. Rept. 220, 163 (1992)

    work page 1992

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    A. R. Liddle and M. S. Madsen, The Structure and for- mation of boson stars, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D1, 101 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, General relativis- tic boson stars, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, R301 (2003), arXiv:0801.0307 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, Dynamical boson stars, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 1 (2023), arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Zhang, Axion Stars, Symmetry 12, 25 (2019), arXiv:1810.11473 [hep-ph]

    H. Zhang, Axion Stars, Symmetry 12, 25 (2019), arXiv:1810.11473 [hep-ph]. 27

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Visinelli, Boson stars and oscillatons: A review, Int

    L. Visinelli, Boson stars and oscillatons: A review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2130006 (2021), arXiv:2109.05481 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ch´ avez Nambo, A

    E. Ch´ avez Nambo, A. Diez-Tejedor, E. Preciado-Govea, A. A. Roque, and O. Sarbach, (in preparation)

  7. [15]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, Proca stars: Gravitating Bose–Einstein condensates of massive spin 1 particles, Phys. Lett. B 752, 291 (2016), arXiv:1508.05395 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Salazar Landea and F

    I. Salazar Landea and F. Garc ´ ıa, Charged Proca Stars, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104006 (2016), arXiv:1608.00011 [hep- th]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Brihaye, T

    Y. Brihaye, T. Delplace, and Y. Verbin, Proca Q Balls and their Coupling to Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 96, 024057 (2017), arXiv:1704.01648 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Minamitsuji, Vector boson star solutions with a quar- tic order self-interaction, Phys

    M. Minamitsuji, Vector boson star solutions with a quar- tic order self-interaction, Phys. Rev. D97, 104023 (2018), arXiv:1805.09867 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, G. Panotopoulos, and E. Radu, Tidal Love numbers of Proca stars, JCAP 08, 029, arXiv:2006.11083 [gr-qc]

    2006 arXiv

  12. [20]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Asymptotically flat, spherical, self-interacting scalar, Dirac and Proca stars, Symmetry 12, 2032 (2020), arXiv:2012.03595 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, N. M. San- tos, and E. dos Santos Costa Filho, The non-spherical ground state of Proca stars, Phys. Lett. B 852, 138595 (2024), arXiv:2311.14800 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Joaquin and M

    C. Joaquin and M. Alcubierre, Proca stars in excited states, Gen. Rel. Grav. 57, 45 (2025), arXiv:2411.09032 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Sanchis-Gual, C

    N. Sanchis-Gual, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, J. C. Degollado, and J. A. Font, Numerical evolutions of spherical Proca stars, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104028 (2017), arXiv:1702.04532 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Sanchis-Gual, C

    N. Sanchis-Gual, C. Herdeiro, J. A. Font, E. Radu, and F. Di Giovanni, Head-on collisions and orbital merg- ers of Proca stars, Phys. Rev. D 99, 024017 (2019), arXiv:1806.07779 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Z. Wang, T. Helfer, and M. A. Amin, General relativistic polarized Proca stars, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024019 (2024), arXiv:2309.04345 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Calder´ on Bustillo, N

    J. Calder´ on Bustillo, N. Sanchis-Gual, A. Torres-Forn´ e, J. A. Font, A. Vajpeyi, R. Smith, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and S. H. W. Leong, GW190521 as a Merger of Proca Stars: A Potential New Vector Boson of 8 .7 × 10−13 eV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 081101 (2021), arXiv:2009.05376 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, A. M. Pombo, E. Radu, P. V. P. Cunha, and N. Sanchis-Gual, The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow, JCAP 04, 051, arXiv:2102.01703 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Sanchis-Gual, J

    N. Sanchis-Gual, J. Calder´ on Bustillo, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, J. A. Font, S. H. W. Leong, and A. Torres- Forn´ e, Impact of the wavelike nature of Proca stars on their gravitational-wave emission, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124011 (2022), arXiv:2208.11717 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. a. L. Rosa and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Shadows of boson and Proca stars with thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084004 (2022), arXiv:2204.12949 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sengo, P

    I. Sengo, P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, The imitation game reloaded: effective shadows of dy- namically robust spinning Proca stars, JCAP 05, 054, arXiv:2402.14919 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Su´ arez, V

    A. Su´ arez, V. H. Robles, and T. Matos, A Review on the Scalar Field/Bose-Einstein Condensate Dark Mat- ter Model, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc. 38, 107 (2014), arXiv:1302.0903 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Axion Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    L. A. Ure˜ na L´ opez, Brief Review on Scalar Field Dark Matter Models, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 6, 47 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, Ultra-light dark matter, Astron. Astro- phys. Rev. 29, 7 (2021), arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Antypas et al

    D. Antypas et al. , New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ul- tralight Dark Matter, (2022), arXiv:2203.14915 [hep-ex]

    2022

  28. [36]

    Jain and M

    M. Jain and M. A. Amin, Polarized solitons in higher- spin wave dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 056019 (2022), arXiv:2109.04892 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Zhang, M

    H.-Y. Zhang, M. Jain, and M. A. Amin, Polarized vector oscillons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096037 (2022), arXiv:2111.08700 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    M. A. Amin, M. Jain, R. Karur, and P. Mocz, Small- scale structure in vector dark matter, JCAP08 (08), 014, arXiv:2203.11935 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Jain and M

    M. Jain and M. A. Amin, i-SPin: an integrator for multicomponent Schr¨ odinger-Poisson systems with self- interactions, JCAP 04, 053, arXiv:2211.08433 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    M. Jain, W. Wanichwecharungruang, and J. Thomas, Kinetic relaxation and nucleation of Bose stars in self- interacting wave dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 109, 016002 (2024), arXiv:2310.00058 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Adshead and K

    P. Adshead and K. D. Lozanov, Self-gravitating Vec- tor Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103501 (2021), arXiv:2101.07265 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, J. March-Russell, N. Song, and S. M. West, Dark photon stars: formation and role as dark matter substructure, JCAP 08 (08), 018, arXiv:2203.10100 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    J. Chen, L. H. Nguyen, and D. J. E. Marsh, Vector Dark Matter Halo: From Polarization Dynamics to Direct De- tection, (2024), arXiv:2407.17315 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Zhang, Probing ultralight dark fields in cosmological and astrophysical systems , Ph.D

    H.-Y. Zhang, Probing ultralight dark fields in cosmological and astrophysical systems , Ph.D. thesis, Rice U. (2023), arXiv:2401.00043 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Zhang, Unified view of scalar and vector dark mat- ter solitons, (2024), arXiv:2406.05031 [hep-ph]

    H.-Y. Zhang, Unified view of scalar and vector dark mat- ter solitons, (2024), arXiv:2406.05031 [hep-ph]

    2024

  38. [46]

    Movies showing the time evolution of the four Proca stars depicted in Fig 2, https://youtube.com/playlist? list=PLtSeM9Y95qPbmOVgqq1Gy0Kag8DJ7ZKZB&si=hg_ tYzoFmDI6KwGN (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    A. A. Roque, E. Ch´ avez Nambo, and O. Sarbach, Radial linear stability of nonrelativisticℓ-boson stars, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084001 (2023), arXiv:2302.00717 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    E. Ch´ avez Nambo, Sobre la existencia de estrellas de bosones newtonianas con momento angular en simetr ´ ıa esf´ erica, Master’s thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicol´ as de Hidalgo (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Matos and L

    T. Matos and L. A. Urena-Lopez, Flat rotation curves in scalar field galaxy halos, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, 1279 (2007)

    2007

  42. [50]

    Ch´ avez Nambo, A

    E. Ch´ avez Nambo, A. Diez-Tejedor, A. A. Roque, and O. Sarbach, Linear stability of nonrelativistic self- interacting boson stars, Phys. Rev. D109, 104011 (2024), arXiv:2402.07998 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    E. H. Lieb, Existence and Uniqueness of the Minimizing Solution of Choquard’s Nonlinear Equation, Studies in Applied Mathematics 57, 93 (1977). 28

    1977

  44. [52]

    Cazenave and P

    T. Cazenave and P. L. Lions, Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics 85, 549–561 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

    P. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 1, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire1, 109 (1984)

    1984

  46. [54]

    Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

    P. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 2, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire1, 223 (1984)

    1984

  47. [55]

    Simon, Sturm oscillation and comparison theorems, in Sturm-Liouville Theory: Past and Present , edited by W

    B. Simon, Sturm oscillation and comparison theorems, in Sturm-Liouville Theory: Past and Present , edited by W. O. Amrein, A. M. Hinz, and D. P. Pearson (Birkh¨ auser Basel, Basel, 2005) pp. 29–43

    2005

  48. [56]

    Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self- gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I

    P.-H. Chavanis, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self- gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: I. Analytical results, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043531 (2011), arXiv:1103.2050 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [57]

    P. H. Chavanis and L. Delfini, Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: II. Numerical results, Phys. Rev. D 84, 043532 (2011), arXiv:1103.2054 [astro- ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Li, Y.-B

    H.-B. Li, Y.-B. Zeng, Y. Song, and Y.-Q. Wang, Self-interacting multistate boson stars, JHEP 04, 042, arXiv:2006.11281 [gr-qc]

    2006 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, and et al., SciPy 1.0: Funda- mental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods 17, 261 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Dormand and P

    J. Dormand and P. Prince, A family of embedded Runge- Kutta formulae, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 6, 19 (1980)

    1980

  53. [61]

    F. S. Lawrence, Some practical Runge-Kutta formulas, Mathematics of Computation 46, 135 (1986)

    1986

  54. [62]

    Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, USA, 1998)

    E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, USA, 1998)

    1998

  55. [63]

    Clough, T

    K. Clough, T. Helfer, H. Witek, and E. Berti, Ghost In- stabilities in Self-Interacting Vector Fields: The Problem with Proca Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 151102 (2022), arXiv:2204.10868 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Mou and H.-Y

    Z.-G. Mou and H.-Y. Zhang, Singularity Problem for In- teracting Massive Vectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 151101 (2022), arXiv:2204.11324 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Coates and F

    A. Coates and F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, Intrinsic Pathology of Self-Interacting Vector Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 151103 (2022), arXiv:2205.07784 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Barausse, M

    E. Barausse, M. Bezares, M. Crisostomi, and G. Lara, The well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for self- interacting vector fields, JCAP11, 050, arXiv:2207.00443 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Aoki and M

    K. Aoki and M. Minamitsuji, Resolving the pathologies of self-interacting Proca fields: A case study of Proca stars, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084022 (2022), arXiv:2206.14320 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    M. E. Rubio, G. Lara, M. Bezares, M. Crisostomi, and E. Barausse, Fixing the dynamical evolution of self-interacting vector fields, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063015 (2024), arXiv:2407.08774 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Ch´ avez Nambo, A

    E. Ch´ avez Nambo, A. A. Roque, and O. Sarbach, Are nonrelativistic ground state ℓ-boson stars only stable for ℓ=0 and ℓ=1?, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124065 (2023), arXiv:2310.18405 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.